tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post1886629654003839270..comments2023-12-11T06:36:33.525-05:00Comments on NESARA- REPUBLIC NOW - GALACTIC NEWS: How Chief Justice Roberts Saved America in His Obamacare RulingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-50137096950234428312013-11-01T02:24:26.710-04:002013-11-01T02:24:26.710-04:00Let me clear up what he is referencing and accurat...Let me clear up what he is referencing and accurate about......WHY IS YOUR NAME IN CAPITAL LETTERS???????? Why is your Birth certificate printed on currency paper? And why is the original http://govtslaves.info/humans-traded-like-stock-via-birth-certificate-bond/DEPOSITED??<br />TRUTHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00103760723991708871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-83152454109103504852013-10-29T18:29:00.124-04:002013-10-29T18:29:00.124-04:00Onlyone ..
..what I have seen for years is the fac...Onlyone ..<br />..what I have seen for years is the fact people have no idea about the truth on how any person becomes a fiction, "(corporate subject)," let me show you how pure simple logic, (knowlede), can and will set you free from all the Corporations hold on you, <br />It is called "NON-FULL-DISCLOSURE", there is no place in the Constitution that says, that if you "sign" or "knownly agree", to any clause, statement, idea, THAT DOSE NOT CLEARLY AND ABSOLUTLY TELLS YOU THAT YOU ARE NOW OWNED BY THE CORPORATION AND MUST DO ANY AND ALL COMMANDS THEY CHOOSE TO GIVE YOU,.... "THEN YOU HAVE NOT BEEN TOTALLY INFORMED OF THE "FACT THAT YOU HAVE GIVEN-UP YOUR CONSTITUTION RIGHTS AND ARE NOW A FICTIONAL ENITITY, (SLAVE WITHIN THE CORPORATION AND NOT ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSURED TO YOU ON WHAT IT MEANS".. "They have intraped you" without your knowlebge". Their Law's, rules, stautures, anything ro rule you."IS NULL AND VOID"<br />"You did not have full disclosure...they just imposted it on you Unconstitutionally, it now has become NULL AND VOID"<br />OnlyoneAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-125064439388604112013-10-28T00:28:08.655-04:002013-10-28T00:28:08.655-04:00I'M WITH YOU.I'M WITH YOU.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-36348716388978043032013-10-26T14:55:15.508-04:002013-10-26T14:55:15.508-04:00I edited out all but statutory sections and Robert...I edited out all but statutory sections and Roberts quotes and do not see the argument rendered here reflected there, see below.I Roberts decision referred to the IRS code where the penalty is to be treated as a tax. Hence, as he stated, it is a tax. (A money bill that did not originate in the House. Adversaries never dealt with this because the US said it was NOT a tax in its presentation)<br /><br />The majority also stated (the leftist judges included) that the Commerce Clause and the Necessary Powers clause did not apply. This is huge as the Commerce Clause has been the essential statists enabling language. In the long run, this simple analysis will define our future away from the creeping statism.<br /><br />So, we have a tax that is called a penalty and, as such, cannot be forcible collected. However, it seems to me, once the penalty is not paid, then it becomes a refusal to pay income tax that results in more penalty which becomes penal and civil in nature. The quotes sections merely say Big Brother can't put you in jail or file against your property.<br /><br />The quoted code sections are misread. Notice, they say "including" in the definition. That is, on top of the regular definition ASLO included are.... The quote section is not defining "person" but adding new ones. I would advise not messing with Mother Nature on this one.<br /><br />The description of the corporate charter is upside down. Charters were given to PROTECT investors in projects the crown would support as companies created income. THe same theory now exists in each state. No one is forced to incorporate a business, a dumb avoidance. The "slave" metaphor does not apply at all. Corporations are legal person, an adopted fiction, and act like a person, assuming formalities are met - like sign a contract. The current area of legal interest is when individuals can no longer hide from penal activity of the company the direct.<br /><br />I expect there are some other documents that explain the theory of people being fictional (which I got from a comment) in the Constitutional structure. WIll look around, but I could not induce the argument. The US Const. was devised to grant to the central government certain powers. Over the years, amendments have ruined the republic. The 16 is what we are dealing with here the right to tax people. <br /><br />Roberts makes no sense to me when he says the bill can tax non action. This is the attack point for those who care. It may be this statement was the warning that new legislation is necessary; however, I don't get it. Can the fed. government pass a law that we all must buy a box of chocolate every year and tax those who don't?<br /><br />It is strong precedent, now, so, when the time comes, the code has to be changed. For my part, I would throw it out. Big mistake. It is the key into everyones lives and we are the ones who established the monster. The bigger mistake is the 17th amendment which single handedly destroyed the republic. The senate is now a state-wide house - a popularity contest won by NYC, LA & SF, Chicago, Phenix. All you need to do is buy off those cities and you own the country, as the founders warned. The made the Senate a creature of the states, not the people for a solid reason. Now, mobs run things.<br /><br />Genehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01527012132442701609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-6235498730663191492013-10-25T11:56:30.145-04:002013-10-25T11:56:30.145-04:00You claim the law was flawed because the IRS does ...You claim the law was flawed because the IRS does not file a notice of lien. However, according to the IRS website, they DO file a notice of lien:<br />"Some of the actions we may take to collect taxes include:<br />Filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien<br />Serving a Notice of Levy, or<br />Offsetting a refund to which you are entitled"<br /> - from http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc201.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-9587731947452697862013-10-24T22:14:50.054-04:002013-10-24T22:14:50.054-04:00The affordable health care act originated in the S...The affordable health care act originated in the SENATE and therefore is null and void as a tax since bills of revenue and spending can only originate in the house of representatives.<br />Also, the senate placed 'spending of specific monies into the 'tax'. A second reason that it can neither stand as a bill of revenue from the senate as well as a bill of taxation.<br />why has NO one pointed this out to the supremes or congress? harvey steelenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-46882522774081430642013-10-24T10:26:51.540-04:002013-10-24T10:26:51.540-04:00Your analysis is all fine, except when the IRS doe...Your analysis is all fine, except when the IRS does not see it your way. There's plenty of room for litigation, and until cases percolate through the judiciary, many will be levied upon and their assets seized. They will then have the opportunity to defend themselves in court. Please also note that stare decisis does not apply to the IRS unless the ruling is made by SCOTUS. In other words, the IRS is bound by the ruling only to the specific taxpayer who litigates and only to the specific tax year litigated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-30927302677943219042013-10-23T12:37:31.316-04:002013-10-23T12:37:31.316-04:00This very hard to follow, especially by those like...This very hard to follow, especially by those like me with no legal education. But let me ask; HOW do people "Stop making FALSE CLAIMS to fictional property"? <br />Are we claiming property just by using our name? Are we to NOT use our name? <br />I assume you have done this; so what is it you have done?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-76604380118378754582013-10-22T15:21:11.640-04:002013-10-22T15:21:11.640-04:00Brilliant! It is nice to see the truth shown. I ...Brilliant! It is nice to see the truth shown. I only wish "People" would read and re-read it until they get it! <br />How frustrating to see people become dumb when shown this, they don't believe it could be true and will go to their deaths defending a fraud! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-24577706068629382672013-10-22T14:39:42.950-04:002013-10-22T14:39:42.950-04:00No wonder this country is in the freaking mess it&...No wonder this country is in the freaking mess it's in! We have Congress voting on Bills and laws made up of hundreds, if not thousands, of pages that they haven't bothered to read, can't read or refuse to take the time to read. We have Supreme Court Justices making rulings and decisions on cases they neither read nor studied, or if they did, failed to understand what they read. We have a president who thinks we have 57 states and either is in total ignorance of the statute requiring the hand-on-the-heart when the National Anthem is played or is so disrespectful he doesn't give a damn...not to mention his ignorance or disdain for the Constitution he took an oath to protect! And he supposedly taught Constitutional Law??? Where was the media on this? We have Congressmen who are so ignorant they believe that Guam will capsize if too many people live there and are too ignorant as to the importance of staying within a national budget, while enthusiastically looking out for their own financial well-being, not to mention their unlawfully exempting themselves from legislation they passed (Obamacare). We have a pandering, dishonest and corrupt MSM that reports only what they want to report and slants it any way they please. Either that or sweeping "news" they don't like to print under the rug and hope no one trips on it revealing what's there! We have law enforcement agencies paid well by the taxpayer who don't do the taxpayers' work. Why hasn't the FBI spoken out about Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama? Where are they? Do we even have an FBI? What about those Muslims on DHS, not to mention the one in the WH! Have we been taken over completely and are too ignorant to even know it and the "Free" Press failed to tell us? And don't forget we have the mindless pleasure-seeking populace that either voted these people into office or tolerates their corrupt bungling while still keeping them in office by supplying them with worthless campaign $$$ their fraudulent corporate govt. prints unlawfully for a privately owned bank. Haha! If this weren't so pathetic, it would be funny! Let us get on our knees for what is ahead...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2471513656433144696.post-7024848279895793192013-10-22T13:30:21.267-04:002013-10-22T13:30:21.267-04:00You misread into that code pertaining to penalties...You misread into that code pertaining to penalties. Those penalties pertain to penalties that only pertain to tax penalties. Obamacare specifically calls it ONLY a penalty. It does not say anything about a penalty for not paying a tax owed. Roberts DID create legislation from the bench by CHANGING the word penalty to MEAN a TAX! The word TAX is not there. <br /><br />But Roberts also ruled that TAX is NOT enforceable because the bill does not provide for any enforcement and because there is NO ENFORCEMENT to force or collect the TAX, that is WHY he ruled it is constitutional. Had there been an enforcement act within the bill then Roberts would have ruled the law unconstitutional. <br /><br />But regardless, the law does not apply to the people. Government has no authority to make any laws that apply to the people. They can only make laws that apply only to FICTIONS! <br /><br />YOU as a private living man or woman are DECEIVED out of YOUR own IGNORANCE where YOU freely volunteer to be liable for a fiction. <br /><br />The way they pull off this deception and get away with it is by capitalizing off your ignorance of you not knowing whop you are where you BELIEVE yourself to be a fiction. The Name you USE you believe yourself to BE that name and you believe that name is YOUR name! That name is just a TITLE which is just a FICTION. It is just a piece of fictional property. You are not THE name you USE and that is not YOUR name that you own. That Name is held by the State as the legal owner. The State holds the original TITLE to it (Certificate of Live Birth) and the State merely issues you a certified COPY of the original. <br /><br />Because YOU BELIEVE yourself to BE that fictitious name and you BELIEVE that is YOUR name, YOU CLAIM that name as IF that was yours! By you CLAIMING that property as if it is yours you give your CONSENT to be held as the surety for that fictional name the State is actually liable for as the legal title holder. <br /><br />Whoever holds original TITLE is the legal owner within their fictional legal system. When you CLAIM that name which is in fact property of the State you commit crimes and offenses against the STATE where you have given your consent to stand as surety for that fictitious name. Stop making FALSE CLAIMS to fictional property held by the STATE and ALL of your issues with government disappear! <br /><br />Just like Title 26 has nothing to do with you the living man, it does apply to that fictional name you USE because that name is fictional property of government which all their laws apply to property owned by the State! <br /><br />Time to wake up from your deep sleep and raise yourself from the DEAD and come out of her! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com