LONDON 2012: Signs that we may be about to get the Shambolympics

LONDON 2012: Signs that we may be about to get the Shambolympics by John Ward Boris's booming voice and ebullient charging about can't hide the reality of what could so easily go wrong. I’ve been in London talking to medical consultants and generally checking out what’s going on behind the scenes of the Olympic build-up. I’ve received several tips in recent weeks about widespread evidence of shambolic organisation and general loss of plot when it comes to the Games, so I thought I’d take a look for myself, and make some enquiries. Although it's being billed as a Best of British opportunity, at just about every main arrivals point, EDF has bought dominant outdoor sites affirming its goal to make the London Games more brilliantly lit than any other. EDF is a French company, so it must be doing very well out of the venue if it can afford this kind of spend. It’s quite hard to spot truly British companies anywhere in the list of sponsors; but then I suppose if you sell off the family silver, that’s what happens. In a decade or so, London will be chosen as the site for a global medical exhibition, and no doubt at that time the sponsors will mainly be American insurance groups. As it is, I met some medics who will be on call for neurological injuries to competitors in the various events. A couple told me that the folks asking for help seemed "rather hysterical" and "a bit headless". In the area of transport to the Olympics – that’s about the only really British bit - the overall impression given to somebody landing from abroad is of an infrastructure that is woefully insufficient to cope with a huge expected increase in visitors. In trying to renew and enlarge all the signage to do with the games, what the organisers have set off is a desire by all visitors even now to follow these routes and take a look at the Village. The result is that the Tubes, trains and buses are already packed to a degree at least 20% above normal. But all the posters and pa announcements consist of headlines (and the ubiquitous Boris himself) politely suggesting that, as it’s going to be a horrendous nightmare for Londoners, why don’t you, um, walk or, er, not come in at all? Not exactly practical or encouraging advice. “Don’t get caught out,” burbles the ebullient Mayor, as if the tube system might be about to freeze up completely. In turn, road routes are being designated and tested to allow for unhindered VIP movement (“Boris’s mates” as some cynical observers suggest) and these activities too are already causing backlogs or backups around the South Circular in general, and throughout Blackheath in particular. But much of the roads stuff is anecdotal: the hard evidence of running late (and headless chicken patch-and-make-do) is to be had among those professions temporarily benefiting from it. This is especially true of my old profession, media communications. As a culture, four of our most pressing contemporary weaknesses are poor deadline discipline, an obsession with process, a fear of great big ideas, and poor interpretation of such data as might be collected. In the work now being done at the last minute by designers, copywriters, promotional experts, digital agencies, marketing advisers, and advertising suppliers, examples of all four syndromes abound. “It’s a bit like the last weeks before the Millennium Dome opened,” said one senior agency manager, “in that there is panic and daft ideas, but no sense of direction or coordination. The satire about all this on the telly is, sadly, an understatement of the anarchic reality.” “Everything is last-minute, half-baked and having money thrown at it,” said another, “As with most things like this, 90% of the overspend occurs in the last 10% of the build-up. It has more than a slight whiff of disaster about it.” “Not much evidence of thought in the brief we were given,” said a design supplier, “and the more you thought about it, the more obvious it became it was a waste of time and money. They are spending and wasting money like water.” I am told that Roddy Doyle (handling the filmic recording and direction side) is at the end of his tether trying to deal with ignorant ‘management’ described as “far more interested in copyright and money deals than they are with documentary quality”. The whole idea of a documentary about the preparations has been ditched because of endless legal wrangles about who would own it, and fears among the more assiduous arse-coverers that such a record will merely present, for posterity and post mortems, clear evidence of the level of shambles involved. The rehearsals for the opening theme - ‘Green and pleasant land’ – have been hampered by committee changes, poor audio, and the largely unpaid, amateur nature of the volunteers taking part. Tuesday night (10th July) saw another run-through; it didn’t allay many fears. In May 2005, my previous site Notbornyesterday made itself very unpopular by saying no Olympic venue had ever really made money or obtained measurable investment benefit from hosting the Games; and I predicted that the then £4.8bn would rapidly get out of control…especially as its patron was the financially incontinent boozer’s friend, Tessa Jowell. So it has proved. Later I suggested that the sailing Olympics off the south and south-west coasts would create chaos for anyone going by car. I still think this will be the case, given that Nimby has, predictably, diluted most of the upgrading plans. The ‘train alternative’ route to the coasts is nowhere near capable of taking up the demand that will be created once the roads seize up. It would be nice to think that Britain might turn a corner as a result of organising the Olympic Games. But far more likely is an acceleration of our slide into insolvency…and a concerted effort by the political class to hide the real coast of putting on the event. My hunch is that it will be very wet, millions of visitors will go back with the impression of an overcrowded and disorganised Britain, but that it might be a blip of concocted pride for a few idiots to get a warm feeling about...until a few weeks later, when the tidal wave of euromeltdown rolls in. We shall see. John Ward | July 11, 2012 at 4:02 pm | Tags: Boris Johnson kicks off leadership campaign, comms suppliers sense headless chicken syndrome, Hysteria fear and loathing in the Games preparations, Olympic Games panics, Prepare for the big overspend, Roddy Doyle exasperated, Watch out for the big budget cover-up | Categories: Make or break for Boris: are we heading for the Shambolympics?

This tells the story, why Bush was so bad at the end of his term.

This tells the story, why Bush was so bad at the end of his term.

Don’t just skim over this, it’s not very long, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out!!!

The day the Democrats took over was not January 22, 2009, it was actually January 3, 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.

The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:

January 3, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress.

At the time:

The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77.
The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%.
The Unemployment rate was 4.6%.
George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH.

Remember the day...January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!

Unemployment...to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!

Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy.

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac? OBAMA

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie? OBAMA and the Democrat Congress

So when someone tries to blame Bush...REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007....THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 2009.

There is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

Daddy's Poem...

Daddy's Poem... Her hair was up in a ponytail, Her favorite dress tied with a bow. Today was Daddy's Day at school, And she couldn't wait to go. But her mommy tried to tell her, That she probably should stay home; Why the kids might not understand, If she went to school alone. But she was not afraid; She knew just what to say. What to tell her classmates Of why he wasn't there today. But still her mother worried, For her to face this day alone. And that was why, once again, She tried to keep her daughter home. But the little girl went to school, Eager to tell them all. About a dad she never sees, a dad Who never calls. There were daddies along the wall in Back, for everyone to meet. Children squirming impatiently, Anxious in their seat. One by one the teacher called On a student from the class. To introduce their daddy, As seconds slowly passed. At last the teacher called her name, Every child turned to stare. Each of them was searching, A man who wasn't there. "Where's her daddy at?" She heard a boy call out. "She probably doesn't have one," Another student dared to shout. And from somewhere near the back, She heard a daddy say, "Looks like another deadbeat dad, Too busy to waste his day." The words did not offend her, As she smiled up at her Mom. And looked back at her teacher, who Told her to go on. And with hands behind her back, Slowly she began to speak. And out from the mouth of a child, Came words incredibly unique. "My Daddy couldn't be here, Because he lives so far away. But I know he wishes he could be, Since this is such a special day. And though you cannot meet him, I wanted you to know All about my daddy, And how much he loves me so. He loved to tell me stories, He taught me to ride my bike; He surprised me with pink roses, And taught me to fly a kite. We used to share fudge sundaes, And ice cream in a cone. And though you cannot see him. I'm not standing here alone. 'Cause my daddy's always with me, Even though we are apart; I know because he told me, He'll forever be in my heart" With that, her little hand reached up, And lay across her chest. Feeling her own heartbeat, Beneath her favorite dress. And from somewhere there in the crowd of dads, her mother stood in tears. Proudly watching her daughter, Who was wise beyond her years. For she stood up for the love Of a man not in her life. Doing what was best for her, Doing what was a right. And when she dropped her hand back Down, staring straight into the crowd. She finished with a voice so soft, But its message clear and loud. "I love my daddy very much, he's my shining star. And if he could, he'd be here, But heaven's just too far. You see he is an American Soldier And he died just this past year,, When a roadside bomb hit his convoy And taught Americans to fear. But sometimes when I close my eyes, it's like he never went away." And then she closed her eyes, And saw him there that day. And to her mother's amazement, She witnessed with surprise, A room full of daddies and children, All starting to close their eyes. Who knows what they saw before them; Who knows what they felt inside. Perhaps for merely a second, They saw him at her side. "I know you're with me Daddy," To the silence she called out. And what happened next made believers, Of those once filled with doubt. Not one in that room could explain it, For each of their eyes had been closed. But there on the desk beside her, Was a fragrant long-stemmed pink rose. And a child was blessed, if only for A moment, by the love of her shining star. And given the gift of believing, That heaven is never too far. They say it takes a minute to find a special person, an hour to appreciate them, a day to love them, but then an entire life to forget them. Send this to the people you'll never forget and remember to send it also to the person that sent it to you. It's a short message to let them know that you'll never forget them. If you don't send it to anyone, it means you're in a hurry and that you've forgotten your friends. Take the time...to live and love. Until eternity.. God Bless There must be many children in the same boat as this little girl, thanks to our servicemen and their families for the sacrifice they are making to keep our country Free. The ULTIMATE sacrifice is being left behind. Don't forget them. PRAY FOR OUR TROOPS!

New York Fed, Geithner May Have Known About Outrageous LIBOR Problems In 2007

THE ROT SPREADS

New York Fed, Geithner May Have Known About Outrageous LIBOR Problems In 2007

Senate Committee to Question Geithner, Bernanke on Libor Incidents

By Cheyenne Hopkins and Caroline Salas Gage - Jul 10, 2012 12:45 PM ET

The Senate Banking Committee will question U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke on the scandal surrounding the London interbank offered rate.

Committee Chairman Tim Johnson said in a statement that he will question Geithner and Bernanke at regularly scheduled hearings this month. Geithner is set to testify before the banking committee on the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul act, while Bernanke will deliver his semi-annual monetary policy report. Johnson didn’t say whether he would have a separate hearing on Libor, which is used as a benchmark for $360 trillion in global securities.

Johnson’s panel joins the House Financial Services Committee in seeking information on the scandal that prompted Barclays Plc Chief Executive Officer Robert Diamond to quit last week after the U.K.’s second-biggest lender was fined a record 290 million pounds ($450 million) for attempting to rig interest rates. At least a dozen banks are being investigated for manipulating Libor.

“I am concerned by the growing allegations of potential widespread manipulation of Libor and similar interbank rates by some financial firms,” Johnson said in a statement. “At my direction the committee staff has begun to schedule bipartisan briefings with relevant parties to learn more about these allegations and related enforcement actions.”

Federal Reserve Bank_New York 

Representative Randy Neugebauer, a Texas Republican who serves on the House Financial Services committee, sent a letter to William C. Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, requesting transcripts of communications between the district bank and Barclays relating to setting interbank offered rates from August 2007 to November 2009. Neugebauer asked for the documents by July 13 in the letter, which was dated yesterday.

The New York Fed was aware of potential issues involving Barclays and Libor after the financial crisis began in 2007 and told authorities in the U.K., according to a statement from the district bank.

“In the context of our market monitoring following the onset of the financial crisis in late 2007, involving thousands of calls and e-mails with market participants over a period of many months, we received occasional anecdotal reports from Barclays of problems with Libor,” New York Fed spokeswoman Andrea Priest said in an e-mailed statement.

Following the rescue of Bear Stearns Cos. in March 2008, “we made further inquiry of Barclays as to how Libor submissions were being conducted,” the statement said. “We subsequently shared our analysis and suggestions for reform of Libor with the relevant authorities in the U.K.”

Federal Reserve System Board

Joe Gagnon, a member of the Federal Reserve Board’s Division of International Finance from 1999 to 2008, said the central bank’s Washington staff also began an informal inquiry into Libor in 2007.

“We were hearing these reports about how accurate the data were, and we looked into it,” Gagnon said in an interview. “It wasn’t a formal investigation. We talked to people in the markets.”

Libor is calculated from a daily survey carried out for the British Bankers Association in London, in which the world’s biggest lenders are asked the rate they’re charged to borrow over a variety of short-term maturities in currencies including dollars, euros and yen. Banks are accused of low-balling submissions for the benchmark during the financial crisis.

Gagnon said Fed staff raised questions about whether reporting banks would be able to borrow large amounts at the reported rate, as opposed to a scale of rates as might occur in a normal market. Gagnon said the Fed staff also discussed the issue with the British Bankers Association. Gagnon is currently a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

To contact the reporters on this story: Cheyenne Hopkins at Chopkins19@bloomberg.net; Caroline Salas Gage in New York at csalas1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net

DERIVATIVES RATE FIXING: The toxic ethics of Michael Spencer

DERIVATIVES RATE FIXING: The toxic ethics of Michael Spencer by John Ward Would you hand over control of a $64trillion financial sector to this man and four untrustworthy banks? Yesterday’s post about Iswap and its openness to broadscale derivative-rate manipulation was, more than anything else, asking questions on the ‘fit and proper people’ dimension. Given it’s a joint-venture company largely owned by four international banks – and given it answers to nobody for the veracity of its quoted rates – then in the light of Libor (Barclays) jiggery-pokery about Lehman Brothers (JP Morgan-Chase), or wobbliness (Bank of America), the criminal attitude and motive is there for all to see. But there is also the central management role cheerfully given to Michael Spencer’s Icap group (itself a broker heavily implicated in the Libor scam). Spencer is a former Conservative Party treasurer impolitely asked to leave that job under something of a share-dealing cloud in 2010. The rest of his swashbuckling financial career seems also to have involved dark clouds, smoke and thus – at various times – the likely presence of fire and rain. As long ago as June 2004, Mr Spencer bought £5.5m worth of shares a day after meeting his friend Stuart Rose, 16 days before the takeover approach, and 20 days before Mr Rose became chief executive. The FSA decided that¸ on the basis of that ‘meeting’, they’d pay Spencer a little visit. This didn’t worry the blasé broker: "I don't dictate FSA policy but I guess it's quite likely they will interview me," admitted Mr Spencer at the time. "The prospect doesn't fill me with great concern. I don't think it will take a huge amount of time. You can only evaluate your own actions in reflection to your own standards. My conscience is 110% clear." Working myself for financial services clients throughout the 1990s, I can attest that Spencer’s low opinion of the FSA (and belief that it had no teeth) was entirely typical. But Michael Spencer has very high standards (according to Michael Spencer) which I suppose you’d have to have if your conscience was 10% over-leveraged. However, over the years – as I will demonstrate - his penchant for sudden purchases and sales of shares has raised a great many eyebrows. Five years later – in January 2009 -  Icap announced a $25m (£15.5m) settlement with America’s Securities & Exchange Commission to see off charges that it displayed fake trades to encourage activity by customers. The announcement was made soon after the UK markets closed (smart move) . “It is essential that Icap and other inter-dealer brokers refrain from engaging in conduct that discredits their privileged position in the marketplace," Lorin Reisner, deputy director of the SEC's division of enforcement, said at the time. The SEC charged (and proved) that brokers on ICAP's U.S. Treasuries desks displayed thousands of fictitious flash, or "bird," trades on computer screens between December 2004 and December 2005. But just five months later, on July 1st 2009, the US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra) fined Icap $2.8 million and sanctioned a former broker for what it described as ‘numerous improper communications with other interdealer brokerage firms about customers' proposed brokerage rate reductions in the wholesale credit default [CDS] market’. Once again, I would remind Sloggers that this is the company and owner behind Iswap – an equivalent Libor for the equally secretive derivative rates process recorded on the now infamous ‘page 19909’. Icap’s fine was split into $1.8 million for its supervisory failures — specifically, failing to detect and prevent improper inter-firm communications — and $1 million for engaging in conduct through its CDS desk manager that was designed to improperly influence other firms and their employees. Seven months on, and Michael the Chatterbox was once more in ‘constructive talks’ (during February 2010) with the UK’s FSA. Although a couple of bad years had overstretched Spencer’s assets to the point where, well, they weren’t really assets, he kept on presenting them as such. The Daily Telegraph reported at the time, ‘Last year, IPGL [majority-owned by Spencer and his brood]  secured a new £200m loan from HSBC to refinance. The loan, was secured against Mr Spencer's stake in ICAP, but he used these shares as collateral without declaring it as such to HSBC.’ Naughty, naughty. In order to reduce the horrendous borrowing requirement of his IPGL, in January he had also sold a £45m stake in ICAP….just three weeks before ICAP gave a profit warning. This too earned him a City censure. He was, in fact, a desperately indebted man bending the rules of engagement to breaking point and beyond. But the sale helped reduce IPGL’s borrowings to £119m by the time the accounts were signed off on February 1 2010. 2010 was another tough year for highly-leveraged millionaires, and not long afterwards, mealy-mouthed Michael’s investment company IPGL was using shares in Numis, a stockbroking firm he chairs, as security against yet another loan. Here too, he did so without telling the firm. David Cameron was called upon to condemn this fly wheeze (as Spencer had not by then been found out by the Tories) and he refused to do so. Just as he refused to condemn Jeremy Hunt’s tax avoidance scheme of 2011, and Hunt’s failure to tell Parliament more than a sanitised version of his Newscorp dealings in 2012….Cameron having roundly condemned both practices in general only weeks earlier. As always with Cameron, he tends to generalise, but in practice, he isn’t that particular. “Would you buy a used car from this man?” was perhaps one of the nastier 1960 Presidential campaign posters used against Richard Nixon – although it did prove remarkably percipient over time. In 2012, based on the ‘form’ presented above, you’d be ill-advised to buy a second-hand car off Michael Spencer. But to give his company the rate-setting control of a $64trillion derivatives market (in partnership with four proven dealers off the bottom of the pack) you would have to be comprehensively deranged, or as bent as a nine-bob note. Or a 24-carat Bob Diamond. Last year, Michael Spencer was still the Conservative Party’s largest donor. Nobody can know that such a donation is to guarantee he is left alone by the authorities, but that must be the impression lots of young and floating voters are being given. Add this to Hunt Balls, Hackgate, Libor, Met Police corruption, cynical EU-turns and incompetent (but devious) NHS reform, and it is almost as if Camerlot is setting out deliberately to hand the moral high-ground to the Ed Miller Band. The fact that the Opposition doesn’t deserve so much as a square foot of it is neither here nor there: the connections, practices, naked whoring, and extremely economical veritas of the Cameron Conservatives demonstrate how the cabal running the Party has ventured way beyond normal levels of despicable cynicism, and marched purposefully on into that bleak desert of depravity occupied by Mandelson, Blair, Whelan, Brown, Lagarde, Schauble, Geithner, Blankfein, Obama,  and others of that ilk. It is clear that, in order to defend his power base, David Cameron the Prime Minister is prepared to turn a blind eye to anyone and anything, and excuse any action - no matter how unethical, fast and loose or despicable it might be. He will renege on any promise, reverse any categorical statement, and befriend any life no matter how low....in order to get what he wants - which is very rarely what the country needs. Beneath that level, there are those in the Tory Party and among the new Young Right prepared to 'explain' any amoral sleaze and sellout rather than have what they see as a suburb of soviet Moscow in charge. Sad as I find it, Dan Hannan has joined this club in recent months: his ‘conclusion’ from all the revelations of banking depravity – that regulators make no difference and therefore should be abolished – takes no account whatsoever of the almost total erosion of commercial and professional ethics over the last three decades. The fact is that if the police and judicial systems did their job without fear or favour, there would indeed be no need for regulators….and most of the current generation of senior investment bankers would be in jail. The jail reference evokes guffaws of hor-hor braying laughter from the Right, but it shouldn’t: yesterday, criminal conman Thomas Scrugg was sentenced to 17 years in prison for his role in defrauding people of some £34m between 2002 and 2008. This is small fry compared to the daylight robbery inflicted upon investors and bank customers during that time. What we are uncovering – as 2012 both unfolds and unravels – is the biggest, most global fraud in history. Starting with MPs’ expenses and Whitehall pension grabs, we have progressed through the bribery and casual law-breaking of Newscorp, and now onto a scam that will dwarf them all. In the US, Federal and tax teams of seasoned finance cops are crawling all over it. Even the sleepy EU plonkers of Brussels have serious Interpol heavies on the case. In the UK, investors and taxpayers are being cheated daily by cyber attacks on market data, rate fiddling, and reckless gambling. But the police clearly have no intention of intervening. It’s time to stop snorting cynically and going “Hahaha, well what do you expect?”: it’s time instead to demand that the rule of Law in our country be upheld. What I expect is something better - and as a taxpaying British citizen, I am entitled to it. John Ward | July 11, 2012 at 2:03 pm | Tags: Failing to declare use of shareholdings as loan assets, FINRA fines, insider trading., Iswap, Michael Spencer, mind-boggling repercussions, SEC charges, the blind eyes of David Cameron, the daft arguments of Dan Hannan, where are the police, where are the Tory ethics?, where is the rule of law | Categories: EXCLUSIVE: HOW ISWAP FIXING THREATENS BOTH THE GLOBAL BANKING SYSTEM & THE UK TORY PARTY

RATES SCAM: Euribor rates ‘rigged throughout 2009-10 crisis’.

  

July 11, 2012

RATES SCAM: Euribor rates ‘rigged throughout 2009-10 crisis’.

As the news began to permeate deep into the MSM – even as far as the Dacre Wail – last night that the Libor rate has been fiddled for perhaps thirty years or more, an interesting (if brain-challenging) piece by John Morrison at Asymptotix argues strongly that euribor was completely rigged two years ago as interbank illiquidity solidified completely during 2009-10 in the eurozone. Thus we had:

‘….the context to incentivise Fixed Income trading desks (most all of which are in London) making losses in the context of total Armageddon, to start to behave in a criminally disruptive manner; the environment was ‘all bets are off’; ‘this is the end of the world as we know it’… the opportunity to rig LIBOR or EURIBOR occurs in a context of crisis where Central Authorities have lost control of the capital market transmission mechanism…’

This is an intriguing viewpoint, and one which I think has some validity – viz, when the authorities are ignorant and incompetent (and we are talking Brussels here) to keep things going it becomes a case of individual players following the sauve qui peut approach. This is backed up by Van Rompuy’s immortal line at the start of Ecofin, June 17th 2010:

“As we can see there is an absence of any sign of crisis at this moment, I hope we can look forward to meeting in a relaxed and comfortable context”.

But whatever the motive at any given time for Libor mendacity, we can see with crystal clarity now that Diamond, Tucker, most of the TSC, Marcus Agius, and let’s face it the entire politico-financial complex have been lying their heads off to us about stuff since forever.

Cheery way to start (or end) the day depending on your position, Pondside.

PLANETARY RATES SCAM: Nobody can deny it now

Reuters joins MSM chorus accepting global knowledge of Libor frauds

Further to previous Slogposts about the multinational nature of Libor manipulation – and the authorities’ knowledge of the same – Reuters said this today….

‘The Federal Reserve Bank of New York may have known as early as August 2007 that the setting of global benchmark interest rates was flawed. Following an inquiry with British banking group Barclays Plc in the spring of 2008, it shared proposals for reform of the system with British authorities.

The role of the Fed is likely to raise questions about whether it and other authorities took enough action to address concerns they had about the way Libor rates were set, or whether their struggle to keep the banking system afloat through the financial crisis meant the issue took a backseat.

A New York Fed spokesperson said:

“In the context of our market monitoring following the onset of the financial crisis in late 2007, involving thousands of calls and emails with market participants over a period of many months, we received occasional anecdotal reports from Barclays of problems with Libor. In the Spring of 2008, following the failure of Bear Stearns and shortly before the first media report on the subject, we made further inquiry of Barclays as to how Libor submissions were being conducted. We subsequently shared our analysis and suggestions for reform of Libor with the relevant authorities in the UK.”‘

It is hard to believe than anyone with a brain could still believe that rate fixing is restricted to any one continent, let alone one bank in one country.

31 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Tagged as Fed raised questions over Barclays in 2008

July 10, 2012

EU ESM LEGALITY: Karlsruhe Court slows things down

Judges in Germany’s Karlsruhe Constitutional Court suggested today that they were being rushed into a decision on the legality of the ESM.

But the Judges did make clear that there will be NO final decisions today on the constitutionality of the ESM and Fiscal Compact approved by European leaders and passed with a two-thirds majority by Germany’s Bundestag during June.

So: already there is more delay than Merkel thought. The more I look at this, the more I think Gauck’s goal is to talk out the ESM/Fiscal Pact laws until such time as it is obvious to even the Bild reader that the eurozone is destined to bankrupt the Fatherland.

But in the meantime, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services said today it had affirmed its ‘AA-’ long-term and ‘A-1+’ short-term issuer credit ratings on the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). The outlook is stable.

All Quiet on the Western Front, then.

finis

Message from SaLuSa by Mike Quinsey - July 11, 2012

Rumor Mill News Agents Forum

Message from SaLuSa by Mike Quinsey - July 11, 2012

Posted By: Mr.Ed [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 11-Jul-2012 08:59:29

Message from SaLuSa by Mike Quinsey - July 11, 2012 There is no time like the present to review your relationships with friends or family. Often when you incarnate you are placed with souls you have known in previous lives, and it is for the reason that you are likely to have issues between you that need facing again. Because there is a block between you it carries forward to each life until it is resolved. When you are placed together again in a family you do not know why, but you may have antagonism for each other. Because family members are expected to try and get on with each other, it would be hoped that differences could be more easily overcome. However, that is not always the case and they can become worse. So if you recognize yourself as being in such a situation, realize how it has come about and make a move to repair the damage to your relationship. Sometimes the hardest part is being able to forgive and it is not a sign of weakness on your part. Be the first one to offer the olive branch and it will release the negative emotions that you hold within. It will be better to have addressed the problem now rather than let it fester and remain with you. Those who hold on to the idea that they are the victim, should understand that karma is the outworking of problems between two people and both are equally involved. Those souls that find it easy to forgive actions against them, are showing their spiritual advancement and in so doing are helping another soul to evolve. It is the way to avoid thinking in terms of revenge, as it is unnecessary as not one soul will avoid having to face spiritual justice at some point. It does not mean that punishment is involved, it is karma and making a resolution that you will accept another opportunity to show that you can deal with your problems without adverse results. Uncontrolled emotions are at the root of so many upsets that you experience, and usually caused by the ego and so called pride. If you want to ascend into the realm where peace and harmony exist, then you must commence living that way now. Be that which you see as being your Higher Self, and be free from your old self that has become saddled with the lower vibrations and lack of Light. The time of fighting for survival is almost over and you are about to enter a new phase where there is no lack but abundance. Where those that are of the dark will no longer be able to bring you down and take away your rights. You stand at the door of freedom and peace, and you are asked little in return except that you treat all others as One with you. If only you could all understand that you have been waiting for this period for eons of time. The past is breaking away from you and you should allow it to move out of your lives. Go forward with the experiences that have lifted you up, and know that those souls whom you have loved and lived with are also doing the same. If it is in your future plans to meet with them again it shall happen, but of course many will travel with you as you ascend. No one is deliberately breaking relationships apart, but you must recognize the free choice others have exactly as you have yourself. Everything that lies ahead for those who ascend is of a higher vibration, and as such it is not prone to the lower vibrations and maintains its form. Aging as you understand it no longer occurs and in fact everything remains in its prime condition. Can you imagine how wonderful that is when there is no decay or death. Yet the conditions are not static and change can take place without leaving a trail of rubbish behind it, as it is instantaneous. Remember Dear Ones, that these are the realms where you will be able to create through the power of thought, and uncreate if necessary. When you think of what you have to gain, it is surely worthwhile putting in whatever effort is needed to be sure you ascend. Your intent is one thing but you need to start living your truth now. The wonders of the Universe are far beyond your imagination and life abounds everywhere even in the same space as you occupy. All souls are experiencing what they have chosen as a means of raising their vibrations, whilst at the same time adding it to the pool of knowledge that all other souls can draw from. Beyond your dimension you will find that the Oneness of all life is appreciated and understood, and consequently there is love and friendship between all civilizations. There are however individual groups that are an exception that you would call rebels, but they pose little harm and can be dealt with. Sometimes they infiltrate from other Universes but can be sent back to where they came from. On Earth it has been vastly different as you are of a much lower vibration that allows for Beings of a similar vibration to enter your space. Having said that it must be pointed out that we have been your protectors to keep unauthorized visitors away from Earth. If you did not have the Galactic Federation of Light traveling with you, you would not be where you are today. In your present cycle you have been as young children needing a guiding hand and protection. We have enjoyed our experiences with you and have learnt much about the problems that you have faced. For us it has been a very satisfying adventure, and we look forward to a wonderful reunion that is approaching very rapidly. Then you shall meet your real families from whence you came eons of time ago. It has been a long journey but in earlier civilizations such as Atlantis many of you met us then, as in certain periods when the vibrations were higher we would regularly walk amongst you. Atlantis had its highs and lows and in the end was responsible for its own destruction. It could so easily have happened again on your Earth but for our presence and intervention. Your destiny is to ascend and no amount of interference by the dark Ones will alter it. It is not only too late but their power base is now falling apart and almost inoperable. They are as you might say running scared, and such was their arrogance they never imagined that their plan could fail. Now they hit out in despair as a last gasp, but that will be all as they are about to be removed from what they thought were their impregnable positions. Never fear Dear Ones, we are in charge and will protect you right up to the last moments. Thank you SaLuSa. Mike Quinsey. THE GALACTIC FEDERATION BY MIKE QUINSEY http://gfbymikequinsey.blogspot.com/

Video - People are awesome ACTION SPORTS

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=EEu42L0ufBY

Hershey candy bars - ingredients WARNING

WARNING:     Hershey candy bars - ingredient

Passing this on. I don't eat these types of candy on a regular basis but only occassionally.  You may want to consider boycotting Hershey's, Snickers at the very least, and be mindful of the ingredients of other candies.  You never know what they may put into that candy.  After all, you are the enemy of the state!

As a side note to this -  I ate half of a newly purchased Hershey's almond chocolate candy bar two days ago - no other food just prior to and none at all after - had very upset stomach for nearly two days, then it subsided. I, for one, will not have another.

I cannot advise strongly enough for everyone to READ LABELS PRIOR TO PURCHASE OF FOODS AND CERTAINLY PRIOR TO INGESTING.  WE DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHERE THE FOODS WE ARE PURCHASING ARE GROWN, BY WHOM THEY ARE PROCESSED AND PACKAGED, AND WHAT IS IN THEM.

**************************** Hi All, I'm passing along a word of caution!! Last week I ate a Hershey's candy bar at about 3pm.  Shortly after, my heart was acting really strange (PVCs) for about 8-9 hours!!  Wondered whether I'd have to call the ambulance and/or whether I could get any sleep.  I've been OK since. This evening (7/9) I read the ingredients to see if I could tell what bothered me. One of the ingredients in Hershey's candy bar now has the acronym            PGPR.    I had to look it up.  Here it is.......             polyglycerol polyricinoleate       http://becausenooneasked.com/2009/12/27/pgpr/ The thing that jumped out was  'ricin'      (part of military NBC - Nuclear / Biological / Chemical warfare)                 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricin No wonder I felt so weird and my heart was acting up!  Thought I'd have to call an ambulance at one point.  Then wondered what I'd tell them in E.R.  The only thing suspicious was a candy bar??! I ate one more bar in the last 3 days to see how I'd feel.  It's scored to create 12 small pieces.  Had 3 small pieces the next day w/o ill effect. Had 3 more yesterday. Finished the last of it this evening.  Felt a tad weird for a short time. Maybe it's a cumulative effect...or maybe I've done so much detoxifying that I'm very sensitive now and feel every minute amount of anything (chemical) not quite right.    After reading these ingredients, I'll never have a Hershey's again!! Please caution all your contacts about Hershey's candy bars! Because I care ___________

Obamatax is illegal

Breaking news: Obamatax is illegal under Establishent Clause, Equal Protection clause, Freedom of Religion Clause according to the new complaint by attorney Orly Taitz

·         Breaking news! New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt

Posted on | July 5, 2012

Press Release

Sent to 30,000 U.S. and International Media outlets

For Immediate Release

Breaking news!

New 113 page complaint with exhibits class action filed on behalf of Christian and Jewish US Citizens:Healthcare Obama Tax is illegal as it violates Equal protection clause, Due Process Clause, Establishment clause and Free exercise of religion clause of the US Constitution, as it exempt Muslim citizens and places a heavy tax burden on Christian and Jewish U. S. Citizens to pay a de facto Judeo-Christian Obama Tax not only for themselves, but also for Muslim citizens, who are exempt. Additionally, Plaintiff Attorney Orly Taitz, who is seeking a class action certification, is bringing forward a second challenge to Obama Tax, asserting that it is illegal, as it was signed into law by Barack Obama under false pretenses and by virtue of fraud, usurping the position of the U.S. President while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers: forged Selective service Certificate, forged Birth certificate and a fraudulently obtained Social security number. Additional cause of action is RICO, asserting that Obama doe America is a de facto RICO organization created to procure fraud committed by Obama. Additional defendants are Attorney General Holder, Registrar of the Department of health of HI Alvin Onaka, former director of Selective Service William A. Chatfield, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue, former Chair Woman of Democratic National Convention in 2008 Nancy Pelosi, former chairman of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz and a number of other defendants.

While the case was filed in the Southern Division of the Central District of California, it was moved by the clerk of the court to the western Division in Los Angeles. When asked, why was the case moved, the clerk stated that it is a violation of civil rights case, which affects the whole district.

Both DOCX and PDF versions of the complaint are attached

Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

Ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

Pro se plaintiff

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PLAINTIFF ) CASE #

V ) ASSIGNED TO

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS ) TRIAL SCHEDULED ON

IN HER CAPACITY OF SECRETARY OF ) VIOLATION OF 14^TH AMENDMENT

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS,

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ) ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

IN HIS CAPACITY OF THE SIGNOR OF THE ) ARTICLE 2, SEC 1 OF COSTITUTION HR3590 PPACA, ) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, STAY

NANCY PELOSI, IN HER CAPACITY )DECLARATORY RELIEF

OF THE CHAIRWOMAN OF THE 2008 ) RICO, PREDECATE CRIMES:

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION ) FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING

AND SIGNOR OF THE CERTIFICATE ) FORGERY AND UTTERING OF FORGED

OF NOMINATION FOR CANDIDATE ) DOCUMENTS TO COMMIT ELECTIONS

FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA, ) FRAUD

BRIAN SCHATZ, LYNN MATUSOW ) 7TH AMENDMENT JURY DEMANDED

IN THEIR CAPACITY AS 2008)

CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY

OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

OF HAWAII AND SIGNORS OF THE,

CERTIFICATE OF CANDIDATE FOR

PRESIDENT FOR BARACK OBAMA;

ALVIN ONAKA, IN HIS CAPACITY

AS THE REGISTRAR OF THE
HEALTH EPARTMENT OF HAWAII,

MICHAEL ASTRUE, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE

COMMISSIONER OF SSA, ERIC HOLDER IN HIS

CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA,

WILLIAM A. CHATFIELD, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE

IMMEDIATE PAST DIRECTOR OF THE SELECTIVE

SERVICE, ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND IN HER CAPACITY

AS A SECRETARY OF THE 2008 DEMOCRATIC

NOMINATING CONVENTION

OBAMA FOR AMERICA

JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES 1-100,

DEFENDANTS

COMPLAINT

PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE.

Plaintiff Orly Taitz is a citizen of the State of California, tax payer and a registered voter with a business address of 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688. Taitz was subjected to persecution, harassment and defamation due to her legal actions, and bringing forward evidence showing Barack Hussein Obama, currently occupying the position of the President of the US and a presumptive nominee for the 2012 Presidential general election, to be usurping the US presidency by fraud and false pretences and use of forged identification papers.

Defendant Katlleen Sebelius, is being sued in her capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human services.

Michael Astrue is being sued in his capacity as the commissioner of Social Security, who is complicit in the cover up of Obama using a Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425 which was not assigned to Barack Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama (Hereinafter “Obama”) is being sued in his capacity as the signor of the H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA).

Defendant Alvin T. Onaka (hereinafter “Onaka”) is being sued in his capacity as the registrar of the Department of Health, who certified a computer forgery, claiming it to be a true and correct copy of Obama’s 1961 typewritten birth certificate.

Defendant William A. Chatfield is sued in his capacity as a former director of Selective Service who buried all evidence of forgery in Obama’s Selective Service certificate, after Taitz hand delivered all evidence to him.

Defendants Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow are residents of the State of Hawaii and are being sued in their capacity as former Chairman and Secretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii, who signed an altered/falsified Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama and removed the necessary wording “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” in order to allow Obama in the White House, while using forged identification papers.

Defendants Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond are being sued as former Chairwoman and Secretary of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, who signed an altered Certificate of Nomination to the state of Hawaii and added the wording that the Chairman and Secretary of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Schatz and Matusow were not willing to include and swear to.

Defendant Eric Holder is being sued as the Attorney General of the United States, who received from Taitz a Quo Warranto complaint as well as multiple criminal complaints with evidence of Obama and others committing massive elections fraud and Obama usurping the position of the US Presidency by virtue of fraud, misrepresentation and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers, and who aided and abetted Obama in the cover up.

Defendant Obama for America, is a fundraising organization for defendant Obama, an alleged RICO created to aid and abet Obama in unlawfully usurping U.S. Presidency through use of forged and fraudulently obtained documents

Defendants Jane Does and John Does 1-100 are believed to be a part of the RICO and of the concerted effort of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by Obama and violation and deprivation of constitutional, civil, human and economic rights of U.S. citizens and racketeering, intimidation, harassment of whistle blowers, civil rights leaders and attorneys like Taitz, who are fighting to end such usurpation and restore above mentioned rights. Jane Does and John Does information will be provided upon further discovery.

JURISDICTION and VENUE

This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 (federal question), 28 U.S.C. §1343 (civil rights), 18 U.S.C. §1964(c) (RICO), and 42 U.S.C. §§1983, 1988 (civil rights action seeking declaratory or injunctive relief). Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §2201-2202 as well as 1988(a).
2. Venue is proper under FOIA and 42 U.S.C. §1988(a) because several plaintiffs live in Orange County within the Southern Division of the Central District of California.

ALLEGATIONS

1.    1. On 06.28.2012 Supreme Court of the United States issued a rulling in National Federation of Independent Business, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.; Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Florida, et al.; Florida, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. 567 U.S. 2012 (docket 11-393, 11-398. 11-400). In a narrow 5- 4 decision against some 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses, Supreme Court ruled that even though the healthcare bill and individual mandates within it, violate the Commerce clause, it is valid under taxing powers of Congress.

2.    2. As of yet this bill was not examined to ascertain whether it violates the rights of the US citizens under the 14^th Amendment equal protection clause and Establishment clause. Taitz filed an intevener brief in the original case filed by the states before judge Roger Vinson in the US. District court in Florida, however judge Vinson decided not to allow individual citizens interveners, as the legal action was voluminous and complex, considering the number of individual states involved. As such individual U.S. citizens did not have an opportunity to have their day in court and redress their grievances vis-a-vis the new Healthcare bill, which is now (compliments to Justice Roberts) is deemed as a Healthcare Tax, or ObamaTax. (Hereinafter “ObamaTax”). Most importantly Taitz alleges that the provision of the Obamatax, which gives exemptions to certain religious sects and divisions, violates the Establishment clause as well as her 1, 5th, 14th amendment rights by violation of her Free Exercise of Religion right, her Due Process right, her equal Protection Under the Law rights.

3.    3. There was no determination whether US citizens rights were violated due to the fact that Barack Hussein Obama, II (Hereinafter “Obama”) the individual who signed the Healthcare bill into law did so under false pretenses, being a foreign national, citizen of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain, who got into the position of the US President and signed the bill into law, used a name that is not legally his and was never legitimate for the office, due to his use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers: a forged Birth Certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a fraudulently obtained Social Security number, which was never assigned to him.

VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE 14^TH AMENDEMENT OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND THE 5^TH AMENDEMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE

4.    4. Under the Equal Protection clause of the 14^th Amendment of the US Constitution and the 5^th Amendment due Process Clause all citizens similarly situated should be treated equally.

5.    5. H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) Section 1411 (5)(A) Exemptions from individual requirements state:

“Sec 5000A. Requirements to maintain minimum essential coverage“

Section 1411 5(A)

(5) EXEMPTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

In the case of an individual who is seeking an exemption certificate under section 1311(d)(4)(H) from any requirement or penalty imposed by section 5000A, the following information:

(A)In the case of an individual seeking exemption based on the individual’s status as a member of an exempt religious sect of division…”

6.    6. A religious sect or division being exempted is a Muslim sect or religion, which claims that any insurance is against their belief, as they see insurance as a form of usury. Consequently any Muslim is exempt from paying a hefty H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) ObamaTax (Hereinafter “Obamatax”), while Christians and Jews will have to pay an estimated $400,000 each over the life time. While Obamatax is scheduled to start with 1% first year, then go up to 2% next year, the sky is the limit. Similarly first Federal income tax passed by the Democrats in Congress in 1894, started with modest 2% Wilson-Gorman Tariff. In 1895 Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, 157 U.S. 429 SCOTUS, which at a time retained some independence and was not prone to bullying from other branches yet, found unapportioned Federal tax to be unconstitutional. In response the federal government pushed for the 16th Amendment, which paved the way to a massive rise in taxation by the federal government. So, as Federal income tax went up from modest 2% on a small group of citizens in Wilson-Gorman act to 35%, so can Obamatax skyrocket, considering inflation, rising cost of healthcare, and particularly violation of 5th Amendment due process and 14th Amendment equal protection clause, which are buried in 2,700 pages of the act.

7.    7. U.S. hospitals do not turn away patients, particularly patients in need of urgent care. So, as Muslims are exempt of paying Obamatax, as an exempt religious sect, Taitz and other similarly situated Christians and Jews will be forced to carry on their shoulders not only the Obamatax assigned to them, but also reapportioned cost of healthcare and Obamatax for the care of Muslims who are exempt.

8.    8. Current situation of social services in Europe going broke shows that aforementioned burden can be enormous. Muslim religion allows a man to have multiple wives, which leads to one man having a large number of children. As an example, Osama Bin Laden was one of 51 children legally fathered by one Muslim man according to Sharia law. Now, according to new Obamatax, Taitz and other similarly situated Christians and Jews will have the burden of not only paying Obamatax for themselves, but also carrying the burden of paying an enormous amount of Obamatax to cover the care of all of these Muslim men, their multiple wives and children.

9.    9. Aforementioned represents a clear violation of the 5th Amendment due process and 14th Amendment equal protection under the law.

VIOLATION OF ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE AND THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT

10.  10. Plaintiff includes, by reference, all prior paragraphs as if fully pled herein.

11.  11. Providing in Obamatax exemptions to some religious sects, while heavily taxing others, at the tune of possibly as much as $400,000 over a life time of every Christian and Jew being taxed by ObamaTax, Federal government is not only engaged in violation of 5th and 14th Amendment due process and equal amendment rights, but is also flagrantly violating the 1st Amendment Free Exercise clause and Establishment clause.

12.  12. First Amendment forbids Federal or state government to interfere with free exercise of religion and from establishing a state religion or intertwining state and religion.

13.  13. By heavily taxing Christians and Jews in Obamatax, while exempting Muslims, Federal government is interfering with a free exercise of religion by Christians and Jews and is forcing them to move towards Muslim religion and ultimately convert in order to avoid heavy new income taxation by the government.

14.  14. This behavior by the Federal government is akin to Jisya (tribute) that is charged by Muslims according to Sharia law from non-Muslims, typically Christians and Jews.

15.  15. Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Obama, aka Barry Obama Soebarkah, aka Barry Soetoro resided in Indonesia. His school records from Assissi school in Jakarta, Indonesia show him to be a citizen of Indonesia, and of Muslim religion.(Exhibit 16 School Registration #203 from Assissi school in Jakarta, Indonesia for Barack (Barry) Obama, showing him as a citizen of Indonesia, using the last name of his stepfather Lolo Soetoro as his legal last name and religion Islam). Consequently, new Obama Judeo-Christian federal income tax was brought about by a foreign national, a Muslim citizen of Indonesia Barack(Barry) Soetoro(Obama). It heavily taxes American citizens of Christian and Jewish religion, while exempting Muslims and making Christians and Jews pay a Jizya for the cost of Healthcare provided to Muslims. Obamatax is unconstitutional towards Christians and Jews, as it violates the 1st, 5th, 14th Amendments

16.  16. Additionally it is unconstitutional, as it violates the Article 2, Section 1 of the US Constitution.

REQUEST FOR CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION AND FOR CERTIFICATION OF TAITZ AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF A CLASS

Taitz is seeking a class certification and a certification of a class representative herein. She is alleging that she is a member of a class of U. S. citizens, who are either Jewish or Christian, who are being flagrantly discriminated as they are obligated to pay a hefty Obamatax, while Muslims are exempt. They are being further discriminated, as they will have to pay not only Obamatax for themselves, but also to cover the Healthcare of Muslims, who are exempt from paying Obamatax.

This action can be maintained as a class action under FRCP Rule 23, which states as follow :

(a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if:

(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable;

(2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class;

(3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and

(4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.

(b) Types of Class Actions. A class action may be maintained if Rule 23(a) is satisfied and if:

(1) prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of:

(A) inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the class; or

(B) adjudications with respect to individual class members that, as a practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;

(2) the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a whole; or

(3) the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. The matters pertinent to these findings include:

(A) the class members’ interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions;

(B) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun by or against class members;

(C) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in the particular forum; and

(D) the likely difficulties in managing a class action.

The members of the class are so numerous that it is impossible and impracticable to bring all of them to this court as named plaintiffs.

Damage to Taitz is similar to damage of other class members

Not certifying this legal action as a class action can lead to conflicting rulings and judgments;

there are questions of law or fact common to the class, specifically unconstitutionality of ObamaTax, as applied o Christians or Jews;

the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and

Taitz will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.

JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OBAMATAX VIOLATES ARTICLE 2, SECTION 1 OF THE US CONSTITUTION AS IT WAS SIGNED BY BARACK OBAMA BY VIRTUE OF FRAUD AND UNDER FALSE PRETENSES AND USING FORGED AND FRAUDULENTLY OBTAINED IDENTIFICATION PAPERS

17.  17. In order to be legal, a bill needs to be signed into law by a lawful US President.

18.  18. Obamatax, is unconstitutional, as it was signed into law by Barack Obama, a citizen of Indonesia, Kenya and Great Britain, who usurped the position of the U.S. President by fraud and by virtue of use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers.

19.  19. Exhibit 1 is a sworn affidavit of Sheriff Joseph Arpaio of Maricopa county, Arizona, attesting to the fact that as a result of his six month investigation he found Obama to be using a forged birth certificate, forged Selective Service Certificate and a forged Social Security number.

20.  20. Exhibit 2, affidavit of Douglas Vogt, expert in scanning and copying machines, attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.

21.  21. Exhibit 3, affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.

22.  22. Exhibit 4, affidavit of Timothy Adams, former Assistant Elections Clerk from Honolulu Hawaii, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii and it was a common knowledge among employees of the office of the Registrar and Elections in Honolulu, Hawaii, that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Hawaii.

23.  23. Exhibit 5, affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that when Barack Obama originally posted his tax returns, he did not “flatten” the PDF file and full Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 that he is using, became visible to the public.

24.  24. Exhibit 6, sworn affidavit of Senior Deportation officer John Sampson, who attested to the fact that there is no legitimate reason for Barack Obama, resident of Hawaii in and around 1977 to obtain a Connecticut Social Security number, which was assigned to a resident of Connecticut, who resided in 1977 in the State of Connecticut.

25.  25. Exhibit 7, affidavit from Linda Jordan attests to the fact that the Social security number, 042-68-4425, which Obama is using was not assigned to him and does not pass E-verify according to attached E-verify record.

26.  26. Exhibit 8, shows SSNVS (Social Security Verification Number) printout which shows that Connecticut Security number, 042-68-4425, which is being used by Obama, was never assigned to him.

27.  27. Exhibit 9, affidavit of typesetting expert Paul Irey attests to the fact that Obama’s alleged long form birth certificate is a forgery, as bits and pieces of the “certificate” were cut and pasted from different documents, as letters show different fonts and sizes.

28.  28. Exhibit 17 Affidavit of Chris Strunk, attesting to the fact that in the passport records for Barack Obama, recently received under the FOIA request, Obama’s legal name, as listed in his mother’s records, is Barack Obama Soebarkah, therefore even if Obama were to have valid identification records, his signing of the ObamaTax was not valid, as he signed it under a name, which was not legally his.

29.  29. Based on all of the above, Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, was a foreign national who got into the position of the US President and Commander in Chief based on forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers and in violation of Article 2,
Section1 of the US Constitution. As such Obama was never legitimate for the US presidency and unlawfully signed the H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) into law.

RICO

Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968

Predicate acts

section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents),

section 1341 (relating to mail fraud),

section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers

section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant),

section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section

section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents)

FRAUD

30.  30. Fraud committed by Obama

Obama defrauded the Plaintiff and others similarly situated by getting on the ballot and in the white house and signing Obamatax under false pretenses and by fraud, using a name that is not legally his and using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers. He created “Obama for America” with a purpose of defrauding American citizens and illegally usurping the U.S. Presidency, while using forged identification papers.

31.  31. Fraud committed by defendant “Obama for America”

“Obama for America” is a RICO organization established and maintained with an illegal purpose of defrauding the U.S. Citizens and usurping the U.S. Presidency.

32.  32. FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANT ALVIN ONAKA

Defendant Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the state of Hawaii, aided and abetted Obama and was complicit in the cover up of the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate from the state of Hawaii.

33.  33. FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANT ASTRUE

Defendant Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security, aided and abetted Obama by covering up the fact that Barack Obama is fraudulently using a Connecticut Social Security number, 042-68-4425, which was issued in and around 1977 in the State of Connecticut to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890 and that this Social Security number does not pass E-verify and SSNVS, when checked under the name Barack Obama.

34.  34. FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANTS BRIAN SCHATZ AND LYNN MATUSOW

Brian Schatz AND Lynn Matusow are being sued in their capacity as former chairman and secretary of the Democratic party of Hawaii, who aided and abetted fraud committed by Obama when they signed an altered/falsified Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama and removed the necessary wording “eligible according to the US Constitution”. Exhibits 10 and 11 show required certification of a candidate for US Presidency, submitted by the Democratic party of Hawaii to the office of elections for Al Gore in 2000 and for John Kerry in 2004. Those certifications show the necessary wording that the candidates for President and Vice President are “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of The U.S. Constitution”. In order to aid Obama and to attempt to avoid criminal liability in certifying a fraudulent certificate of Nomination, Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow falsified the Certificate of Nomination and removed the words “eligible to the U.S. Constitution” from the certification sent to Hawaii office elections on behalf of Obama.

35.  35. FRAUD COMMITTED BY DEFENDANTS NANCY PELOSI AND ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND

Nancy Pelosi and Alice Travis Germond aided and abetted fraud committed by Obama when, as a former Chairwoman and Secretary of the 2008 Democratic National Convention they signed an altered certificate of nomination to the State of Hawaii. Certification of Nomination for John Kerry, which was sent to all 50 states in 2004 (Exhibit 13) and certification for Obama, which was sent to 49 states in 2008 (Exhibit 14) were identical. However, Obama could not get on the ballot in the general election, as the State of Hawaii required the wording “eligible under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution” and Brian Schatz and Lynn Matusow were not willing to sign the certification with such wording, as they knew that Obama was not a natural born citizen and did not qualify. Subsequently Pelosi, Germond, Schatz, Matusow and Obama acted in concert, as Schatz removed the necessary wording from the certification sent by the Democratic party of Hawaii and Pelosi added this wording to the DNC certification (Exhibit 15). Through this scheme Schatz, Matusow, Pelosi and Germond acted in concert and aided and abetted ineligible Obama to get on the ballot in 2008 election. Through manipulation of certificates, Schatz, Matusow, Germond and Pelosi were complicit in fraud and forgery of records.

36.  36. Eric Holder is being sued as the Attorney General of the United States, who received from Taitz a Quo Warranto complaint as well as multiple criminal complaints with evidence of Obama and others committing massive elections fraud and Obama usurping the position of the US by virtue of fraud, misrepresentation and use of forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers, and who aided and abetted Obama in the cover up.

37.  37. Defendants acted with an intent to defraud. Plaintiffs were intended victims and foreseeable victims. Plaintiffs suffered financial damages, defamation, humiliation, harassment and emotional distress as a result of fraud committed by the Defendants.

MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD

38.  38. DEFENDANT OBAMA

Defendant Obama committed mail and wire fraud when he posted on the Internet in and around April 27, 2012, a paper, which he claimed to be a true and correct copy of his long form birth certificate, which was in reality a computer generated forgery. He additionally committed mail and wire fraud by sending to multiple courts his forged birth certificate, claiming it to be a genuine birth certificate. Not only did he post a forgery, but he also used this opportunity to unleash a campaign of persecution, harassment and intimidation of Taitz and other civil rights leaders and political dissidents by calling them a “side show’ and “carnival barkers”.

39.  39. Obama committed mail and wire fraud when he posted on the Internet on his site “Fight the smears” a paper, which he claimed to be his short form birth certificate, which was in fact a computer generated forgery. He continued committing such fraud by sending this forged birth certificate to multiple courts and organizations.

40.  40. Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he posted on line on White house.gov Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425, claiming it to be a valid number, when in fact it is a fraudulently obtained number, which was never assigned to Barack Obama

41.  41. Obama committed mail and wire fraud, when he posted on line his alleged Selective Service Certificate, claiming it to be his valid Selective Service certificate, making him eligible to work in the Federal Government, while in reality he posted a forged birth certificate, created in 2008 with a cut out in half and reversed 2008 postal stamp.

42.  42. Obama knew that he was committing fraud and intended to defraud in order to continue usurping the position of the U.S. President.

43.  43. Obama committed fraud when he sent to 50 states in 2007-2008, as well as in 2011-2012, his declarations of nomination. Obama used mail or other instrumentalities of the Interstate commerce to commit such fraud.

44.  44. Obama committed fraud when, in and around January 25th, 2012, through his attorney Michael Jablonski, sent a defamatory letter to the Secretary of State of Georgia, where he attacked Plaintiff Taitz, who was an attorney in Farrar v Obama, claiming that he has produced a birth certificate and that he suffers from Taitz.

45.  45. In and around November 19, 2011, Obama committed mail and wire fraud when, he, through his agent, Deputy Campaign Manager Juliana Smoot, personally attacked and defamed Taitz: “Release the Mugs By Julianna Smoot, Deputy Campaign Manager on November 19, 2011. Yesterday, four Republicans in the New Hampshire State House allowed a hearing requested by Orly Taitz, the notorious dentist-lawyer-birther, who wants President Obama officially removed from the state’s primary ballot. So in honor of conspiracy theorists everywhere, we’re re-releasing the campaign’s limited-edition “Made in the USA” mugs.
There’s clearly nothing we can do to satisfy this crowd—or anyone else who insists on wasting time and energy on nonsense like this.
But when it starts to make your head hurt, I’ve found the best remedy is to have some tea in my “Made in the USA” mug.
Works like a charm. I recommend Earl Grey.

PATTERN OF ONGOING RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

46.  46. Fraud committed by Defendants who were acting directly or indirectly and committed fraud, which was on going from 2007 until now, for over four years. Actions by the defendants established a pattern of racketeering activity within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. §1962(c), in that their common purpose was to defraud, and the common result was to defraud. Plaintiffs were victims of the acts of racketeering and the acts of racketeering were otherwise related by distinguishing characteristics and were not isolated events.

47.  47. Forged document that were uttered by Obama

a. Long form birth certificate- affidavits of Adobe illustrator expert Felichito Papa, scanning and printing machines expert Doug Vogt, senior deportation officer John Sampson and announcement by sheriff Arpaio (exhibits 1-3) show Obama’s long form birth certificate to be forged

b. Short form birth certificate-certification of live birth. Research by Dr. Ron Pollard show short form birth certificate to be forged

c. Selective service certificate-investigative report by federal agent Steven Coffman, journalist Linda Bentley and announcement by Sheriff of Maricopa county, Arizona and lead investigator Mike Zullo, show Obama’s selective service certificate to be forged.

d. Social Security certificate-affidavits of Senior Deportation officer Sampson, licensed investigator Daniels, researcher Linda Jordan, adobe illustrator expert Felicito Papa show Obama using as his own a social security number 042-68-4425, which was assigned to another individual, resident of Connecticut, who was born in 1890.

e. Possibly all other identification documents are fraudulently acquired, as those rest on forged primary identification papers.

48.  48. Barack Obama knew that he is using forged identification papers and is not eligible for the U.S. Presidency.

49.  49. Obama created “Obama for America” with a purpose to defraud American citizens and illegally usurp the U.S. Presidency, while using forged identification papers.

50.  50. Defendant Loretta Fuddy, director of Health of the State of Hawaii, aided and abetted Obama in committing elections fraud by covering up the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate

51.  51. Defendant Alvin Onaka, Registrar of the State of Hawaii aided and abetted Obama and was complicit in the cover up of the fact that Obama is using a forged birth certificate.

52.  52. Defendant Michael Astrue, commissioner of the Social Security aided and abetted Obama by covering up the fact that Barack Obama is fraudulently using a Connecticut Social Security number, 042-68-4425, which was issued in and around 1977 in the State of Connecticut to a resident of Connecticut born in 1890 and that this Social Security number does not pass E-verify, when checked under the name Barack Obama

53.  53. Defendant William A. Chatfield, former director of Selective Service acted in concert with other defendants in burying all evidence after Taitz provided it to Chatfield in and around March 25, 2009. Chatfield did not take any action in regards to Obama’s forged Selective Service certificate and simply left the Selective service shortly thereafter

54.  54. Plaintiff suffered defamation and humiliation, endured multiple death threats and sanctions, while she was telling the truth about the fact that defendant Obama is committing elections fraud and is using and uttering forged documents as a proof of his eligibility for the U.S. Presidency. Plaintiff Taitz received multiple death threats from Obama supporters who do not believe that their “messiah” is capable of committing elections fraud and using forged documents. Unless the injunction is issued and the public is apprised of the evidence of the elections fraud and forgery by Obama, such death threats will continue until one of Obama’s supporters will succeed in making his threat a reality.

55.  55. Plaintiff suffered damages of emotional distress, financial damages, defamation, slander, harassment as a direct result of the actions by the Defendants.

56.  56. Defendants acted intentionally, outrageously, oppressively, despicably and maliciously. Exemplary and punitive damages are warranted in order to punish and deter such conduct in an amount to be determined at trial.

RELIEF SOUGHT

57.  Declaratory relief deeming individual mandate H. R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) to be discriminating and violating of the Equal Protection clause of the 14^th Amendment, Due Process clause of the 5^th Amendment and Free Exercise of Religion and Establishment clause of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and therefore unconstitutional.

58.  Declaratory relief deeming the Healthacare tax to be violative of the Establishment clause and unconstitutional.

59.  Certification of Taitz as a representative of a class of 306 million US citizens, who are Christians or Jews, whose constitutional rights of equal protection under the law and free exercise of religion under the First Amendment and separation of State and Church under the Establishment Clause have been egregiously violated by the heavy taxation imposed by the H.R. 3590 PPACA (Obamacare), while 7 million Muslims, US citizens were exempted from such taxation

60.  Stay of taxation of citizens under H.R. 3590 PPACA, whose religion does not give them an exemption based on individual’s status as a member of an exempt religious sect or division.

61.  Stay of any and all collection of taxes and penalties by the IRS in relation to failure by Taitz or any other individual who is a Christian or a Jew or member of any other religion, who does not fall under the exemption of religious sect or division under Section 1411 5(A)(5)(A) which grants Muslims an exemption from paying the Healthcare tax.

62.  PERMANENT INJUNCTION preventing taxation of Taitz, as well as other US citizens, who are Christians or Jews, who were made to pay heavy Healthcare tax under H. R. 3590” Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (PPACA) , in order to subsidize healthcare of Muslims, who were exempted under 1411 (5)(A) and an exempt religious sect or division.

63.  Declaratory relief deeming taxation of Taitz and others similarly situated U.S. citizens under the new H.R.3590 tax to be unconstitutional, as H.R. 3590 was signed into law by a foreign national Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah, who usurped the position of the US President by fraud and while using forged and fraudulently obtained identification papers, and while never being eligible for the position of the U.S. President.

64.  Declaratory relief deeming that defendants (aside from defendant Sebelius)

acted in a racketeering fashion and acted in concert in committing elections fraud and allowing usurpation of the US Presidency by a foreign national Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama Soebarkah, using forged and fraudulently obtained identification records, and allowing him to unlawfully sign bills and executive orders, including ObamaTax, aka H.R. 3590.

65.  Treble damages in RICO to cover financial damages, as well as damages suffered as a result of defamation, slander, harassment and persecutions of Taitz, who blew the whistle on Obama and other Defendants.

1.    Court costs, attorneys’ fees and any and all relief that the court will find to be just and proper.

Respectfully submitted

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

07.02.2012

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Exhibits

66.  Affidavit of Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, stating that Barack Obama’s alleged Birth certificate, Selective service Certificate and Social Security number represent forgeries.

67.  Affidavit of expert Douglas Vogt attesting to the fact that Obama’s birth certificate represent a forgery.

68.  Affidavit of Felicito Papa attests to the fact that the alleged birth certificate of Obama is a computer generated forgery.

69.  Affidavit of assistant registrar of the state of Hawaii Timothy Adams, attesting to the fact that there is no birth certificate for Obama in any hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.

70.  Affidavit of Adobe Illustrator expert Felicito Papa attesting to the fact that Barack Obama posted his full Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425 on white House.gov with his 2009 tax returns and posted on April 15, 2010.

71.  Affidavit of John Sampson, Senior Deportation officer of the department of homeland security, attesting to the fact that there was no legitimate reason for assigning a Connecticut Social security number to Barack Obama, resident of Hawaii.

72.  Affidavit of Linda Jordan and attached e-verify attesting to the fact that Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 issued to Obama was not assigned to Obama.

73.  SSNVS (Social security verification systems) printout attesting to the fact that Connecticut social security number 042-68-4425 used by Obama was never issued to Obama

74.  Affidavit of typesetting expert Paul Irey attests to the fact that Obama’s alleged long form is a forgery, as bits and pieces of the “certificate” were cut and pasted from different documents, as letters show different fonts and sizes

75.  Certification of Nomination of Al Gore issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2000.

76.  Certification of Nomination of John Kerry issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2004.

77.  Certificate of Nomination of Barack Obama issued by Democratic Party of Hawaii to the Elections Division in the State of Hawaii in 2008.

78.  Certificate of Nomination of John Kerry by Democratic National Committee sent to the State of Hawaii in 2004.

79.  Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee in 2008 sent to 49 states.

80.  Certificate of Nomination for Barack Obama by Democratic National Committee sent to the Office of Elections of the State of Hawaii in 2008 (with edited wording).

81.  School registration #203 for Barack Obama from Assissi school in Jakarta Indonesia and showing Obama using his step father’s last name Soetoro as his legal name, as well as listing his citizenship as Indonesian and his religion Islam

82.  Affidavit of Chris Strunk, authenticating passport records of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, received by him under the FOIA request from the Department of State and showing Obama’s legal name in his mother’s passport records to be Barack Obama Soebarkah.

83.   

Taitz v Sebelius pages 1-30

Taitz v Sebelius pages 31-60

Taitz v Sebelius pages p61-90

Taitz v Sebelius pages p91-113

Category: HOT ITEMS!, Important Contacts, Latest News, Legal Actions, LINKS, Obama Fraud Gate, orly taitz attorney, Orly Taitz civil rights leader, Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012, Orly Taitz Hawaii, Orly Taitz Obama birth certificate, Orly Taitz Obama social Security number, Orly Taitz ObamaFraudGate, Other Criminal or Suspicious Activities

Ridiculus claims from Obots in response to my complaint

Posted on | July 5, 2012 Obots already started a smear campaign against this new law suit, claiming that I am lying and that there is no evidence of Muslims having a Reigious opposition towards insurance and usury. They are bringing a citation from some sheikh or Imam that if one gets from insurance more money than he put in, it will be o’k, as long as he gives the difference to the charity.

The question is: what if he put in $100, but his healthcare is worth $100,000 for expensive surgeries, how can he give this money to charity, where the payment for his healthcare will come from? Additionally, what charity does this Sheikh or Imam is talking about: is it Muslim Brotherhood charity? That would be a really good place to send our Obamatax dollars

Thank you Mr. Mehr for your generous donation of $100, it will help cover the costs and fee and salary of the paralegal, who is working with me on 5 Obama cases

Posted on | July 5, 2012 |Currently I have 5 cases challenging Barack Obama: MS, IN, GA (application for stay filed with Justice Thomas in the Supreme Court), DC (Social Security challenge), CA ( Judeo -Christian ObamaTax challenge)

Susan Daniels filed a challenge aginst Obama in OH. I did not see the actual complaint yet. If someone has it, please, send it to me

Does anyone have this video clip with animation recreation of assassination of Judge Rolls. This is important, as other judges might be scared to rule in our favor, as they are threatened.

Posted on | July 5, 2012 Re: Judge Rolls was assassinat?ed, when he heard a case related to a drug cartel.Wwa?s it the same drug cartel which got 2,000 assault weapons from attorney general Eric Holder?
Tracy
7:17 AM (20 minutes ago)

When this first happened, there was a video that I saw ONE time, it was on some cable news channel but I never saw it again and still can’t find it.

It was an animation of the walking/shooting route the shooter took and it was his actions in animation as he did them. It showed his first shot or two and then they showed him hitting judge rolls while behind a table, him falling down and then the shooter bending down, reaching UNDER the table to shoot him again! This almost proves that he was the target, because they made sure they got HIM! Giffords just happened to be in the way.

I looked for this video a while back and could never find it, but I will try to find it again…

from a supporter Leslie Johnson

Posted on | July 4, 2012

Leslie Johnson 4 approved

If Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., is really a decaying zombie why is “PRESIDENT WHAT EVERY HIS NAME IS”, terrified to personally appear in court against her. In fact he is spending millions of dollars to avoid appearing in court against Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. It looks like he is scared to death of all the unrefuted facts she has in all her case filings. I’m still waiting for somebody to explain the on again and off again “KERNING” on the phony Birth Certificate he has shown to the America people. Why has America taking a blind’s eye to this very simple fact that’s right before their eyes. It doesn’t take any special training at all to see this “KERNING” mess is nothing but a forgery. America, please wake-up to what Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., has been telling, showing, and proving for years.

Obama’s hired guns produced their highly intellectual response to my filling of the application for stay with Justice Thomas: “(she)… is a birther zombie with a decaying body”. Why, you may ask? One of the the pages of the brief on the blog did not scan well, was not clear 5 View Post

Obama’s hired guns produced their highly intellectual response to my filling of the application for stay with Justice Thomas: “(she)… is a birther zombie with a decaying body”. Why, you may ask? One of the the pages of the brief on the blog did not scan well, was not clear

o    Historic DVD Now Available!


DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.

Pay by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com or by check to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
---------------------------------------
CITIZENS! YOU CAN CHALLENGE OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY. Obama does not meet the requirements to be on the ballot, and he has submitted false documents in support of his eligibility.
Call your state secretary of state on how you may file a challenge.
Addresses of State Election Agencies.
Phone numbers of the Secretaries of States.
Call your state governor to complain about this violation of the U.S. Constitution. Phone numbers of the State Governors.
-------------------------------------

Dr. Orly Taitz runs for U.S. Senate 2012

CAMPAIGN FLYER for Orly Taitz as U.S. Senator from CA in 2012.

How to contact public Integrity unit
See The PDF File Here
US Department of Justice has a special unit in their Criminal Division called the
PUBLIC INTEGRITY SECTION

·         --------------------------------------
Please make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA U.S. Senate 2012 Campaign
--------------------------------------