|
Friday, March 1, 2013
Incredible Music Box
Brussels Court finds Pope, Elizabeth Windsor and Canada PM guilty of Genocide
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Brussels Court finds Pope, Elizabeth Windsor and Canada PM guilty of Genocide
Posted By: X_Hermes [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 07:37:14
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 07:37:14
|
- See more at: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270694#sthash.IfxPyo8Q.dpuf
BREAKING: CDC Issues Advisory on Emerging Superbug - CRE: 40 to 50% Mortality Rate. 1 Year Infection Period.
Subj: BREAKING: CDC
Issues Advisory on Emerging Superbug - CRE: 40 to 50% Mortality Rate. 1 Year
Infection Period.
BREAKING:
CDC Issues Advisory on Emerging Superbug - CRE: 40 to 50% Mortality Rate. 1
Year Infection Period.
Tags:
Carbapenem-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a serious threat to public health.
Infections with CRE are
difficult to treat and have been associated with mortality rates as high as
40-50%.
BREAKING: CDC Issues Advisory on Emerging
Superbug – CRE: 40 to 50% Mortality Rate. 1 Year Infection Period.
February 28th, 2013
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is alerting
clinicians of an emerging untreatable multidrug-resistant organism in the
United States.
There are many forms of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
(CRE), but of the 37 forms reported in the U.S., 15 have been reported in less
than a year.
The CDC said the increase in CRE means health care providers need to “act aggressively to prevent the
emergence and spread of these unusual CRE organisms.”
Enterobacteriaceae lives in water, soil and the human gut. These
“surperbugs” have developed high levels of resistance to antibiotics – even
carbapanems.
Individuals who usually develop CRE infections are those who are
taking antibiotics and getting significant medical treatment for other conditions.
2012 CRE Toolkit – Guidance for Control of Carbapenem-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a serious threat
to public health.
Infections with CRE are difficult to treat and have been associated
with mortality rates as high as 40-50%.
Due to the movement of patients throughout the healthcare system,
if CRE are a problem in one facility, then typically they are a problem in
other facilities in the region as well.
(The rumble is; this is because of all the
antibiotics fed to our animals raised for meat.)
Ragtime: Code name of NSA’s Secret Domestic Intelligence Program Revealed in New Book
Ragtime: Code name of NSA’s Secret
Domestic Intelligence Program Revealed in New Book
“Deep
State” uncovers new details about the agency’s secretive
and
hugely controversial surveillance programs.
Published February
27, 2013
More than a decade after the 9/11 terrorist
attacks, a set of extraordinary and secretive surveillance programs conducted
by the National Security Agency has been institutionalized, and they have
grown.
These
special programs are conducted under the code name Ragtime, and are divided
into several subcomponents, according to the new book Deep State: Inside the Government
Secrecy Industry, by Marc Ambinder and D.B. Grady. (I purchased
a copy this morning.)
The
authors, both journalists who cowrote a previous book about special operations
in the military, have dug deep into the code names and operational nitty gritty
of the NSA's secretive and hugely controversial surveillance programs, and
they've come up with impressive new details.
Ragtime,
which appears in official reports by the abbreviation RT, consists of four
parts.
Ragtime-A
involves US-based interception of all foreign-to-foreign
counterterrorism-related data;
Ragtime-B deals with data
from foreign governments that transits through the US;
Ragtime-C deals with
counterproliferation actvities;
and then there's Ragtime-P,
which will probably be of greatest interest to those who continue to demand
more information from the NSA about what it does in the United States.
P stands for Patriot Act.
Ragtime-P is the remnant of the original President’s Surveillance Program,
the name given to so-called "warrantless wiretapping" activities
after 9/11, in which one end of a phone call or an e-mail terminated inside the
United States. That collection has since been brought under law, but civil
liberties groups, journalists, and legal scholars continue to seek more
information about what it entailed, who was targeted, and what
authorities exist today for domestic intelligence-gathering.
Deep
State has some answers.
Only about three dozen NSA
officials have access to Ragtime's intercept data on domestic counter-terrorism
collection. That's a tiny handful of the agency's workforce, which has been
pegged at about 30,000 people.
As many as 50 companies have
provided data to this domestic collection program, the authors report.
If
the NSA wants to collect information on a specific target, it needs one
additional piece of evidence besides its own "link-analysis"
protocols, a computerized analysis that assigns probability scores to each
potential target. This is essentially a way to use a computer data-mining
program to help determine whether someone is a national security threat. But
the authors find that this isn't sufficient if NSA wants to collect on said
target. And while the authors found that the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court rarely rejects Ragtime-P requests, it often asks the NSA to
provide more information before approving them.
How the surveillance is
approved tells us a lot about the breadth of the NSA's intelligence gathering.
The court and the Attorney General both certify a slate of approved targets
under Ragtime-P, the authors find. That includes a certain amount of "bulk
data"—such as phone call logs and records—that can be collected around
those targets. An NSA official told the authors that Ragtime-P can process as
many as 50 different data sets at one time.
What
happens next looks like a 21st-century data assembly line. At the NSA's
headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland, a program called Xkeyscore processes all
intercepted electronic signals before sending them to different
"production lines" that deal with specific issues. Here, we find
another array orities
set by the Director of National Intelligence; Airgap, which deals with missions
that are a priority for the Departmentjustify;">
Pinwale is the main NSA
database for recorded signals intercepts, the authors report. Within it, there
are various keyword compartments, which the NSA calls
"selectors."
Metadata (things like the
"To" and "From" field on an e-mail) is stored in a database
called Marina. It generally stays there for five years.
In a database called Maui
there is "finished reporting," the transcripts and analysis of calls.
(Metadata never goes here, the authors found.)
As all this is happening,
there are dozens of other NSA signals activity lines, called SIGADS, processing
data. There's Anchory, an all-source database for communications intelligence;
Homebase, which lets NSA analysts coordinate their searches based on priorities
set by the Director of National Intelligence; Airgap, which deals with missions
that are a priority for the Department of Defense; Wrangler, an electronic
intelligence line; Tinman, which handles air warning and surveillance; and
more.
Lest you get confused by this
swirl of code names and acronyms, keep this image in mind of the NSA as a
data-analysis factory. Based on my own reporting, the agency is collecting so
much information every day that without a regimented, factory-like system, analysts
would never have the chance to look at it all. Indeed, they don't analyze much
of it. Computers handle a chunk, but a lot of information remains stored for
future analysis.
We have a preceding example
to test this hypothesis, albeit in a limited fashion. In 2004, the senior
leadership of the Justice Department and the FBI threatened to resign over what
they saw as illegal collection activities at the NSA, collection actlass="p3" style="line-height: 12.6pt; margin: 0in 0in 0.1in; text-align: justify;">
That the NSA is policing
itself may come as small comfort to many critics of the Obama administration's
intelligence programs. The size of the "compliance staff" that
monitors this activity is only about four or five people, depending on what's
available in the budget at any moment, the authors report. They also say
that we cannot know whether the program is pushing beyond the boundaries of the
law.
However, outside the closed
circle of about three dozen NSA employees who are read in to Ragtime, there
more than 1,000 people "outside the NSA are privy to the full details
of the program." If NSA is breaking the law, "how much longer can
that secret last?" the authors ask.
We have a preceding example
to test this hypothesis, albeit in a limited fashion. In 2004, the senior
leadership of the Justice Department and the FBI threatened to resign over what
they saw as illegal collection activities at the NSA, collection activities
that are still going on under Ragtime and under new surveillance law.
Back then, James Comey,
acting as Attorney General while John Ashcroft was in the hospital, refused to
sign a set of certifications provided by the Justice Department to Internet,
financial, and data companies, the authors report. Why? Comey believed that the
justification for providing bulk data to the NSA wasn't sufficient.
The administration's tortured
logic "drove him bonkers. There was just no way to justify this," the
authors report, quoting people who have spoken to Comey, who has never publicly
said why he objected. Interestingly, the authors find that the parts of the
program he was objecting to didn't implicate the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act.
This
comports with my own reporting in my book, The Watchers. The NSA
was making "mirrors" of telecommunications databases, so that
analysts could go through the data and mine it for clues. As it has been
explained to me, the problem here dealt with how the government viewed its
legal authorities to access data stored in computers, and whether analysts
could dip back into it without specific authorizations. Importantly, this data
consisted of that so-called "bulk data." It wasn't recorded phone
calls or the text of e-mails. That information was governed by FISA--or should
have been--because it was considered "content" under law, and that
requires a warrant to obtain.
The White House panicked when
Comey and Ashcroft refused to sign off, Ambinder and Grady report, fearing that
the companies on which NSA was depending for information would cut the agency
off if they didn't get a signed order from the Attorney General himself. It
took six months for the administration to reshape the program so that it
comported with "interpretation of the metatdata provisions" that were
promulgated by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel.
Had
these officials resigned, it's unthinkable that the secrets of NSA's
intelligence gathering activities would have stayed hidden. A year later, in
2005, they were revealed in part by the New York Times. Here, too,
Ambinder and Grady have some new insights. It turns out that while the NSA's
director, General Michael Hayden, was publicly excoriating the newspaper for
disclosing the classified activities, he was privately glad that
they withheld what he considered key operational details.
Sarah Palin: Feds Are Stockpiling Bullets For Us
Sarah Palin: Feds Are Stockpiling Bullets For Us
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin took to Facebook on Tuesday and put her two cents worth in on why she believes the Federal government is acquiring so much ammunition. Her remarks, seemingly to clarify her earlier tweet, about the current economic situation in the United States and the massive debt we have hanging over us concluded by stating, “We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”
Palin told those in Washington to “Cut the Drama. Do Your Job.”
She then went on to expound what the vast majority of Americans think. She wrote, “Americans are sick and tired of yet another ginned-up crisis. D.C. needs to grow up, get to work, and live within its means. The real economic Armageddon looming before us is our runaway debt, not the sequester, which the President advocated for and signed into law and is now running around denouncing because he never had any genuine intention of reining in his reckless spending.”
Palin also reminded her followers that the sequestration was the result of the long debt ceiling standoff in the summer of 2011. While she said it was not an ideal outcome for anyone, she attempted to claim that it at least included “real deficit reduction of about $110 billion per year for 10 years.” Actually the number is much less than that and when spread out over ten years and over various Federal programs and agencies, the effects would hardly be noticed.
The former GOP vice presidential candidate said that American families had already been hit with more tax increases because of Obama’s policies and bills he has signed into law, though she rightly points out that Obama calls taxes “revenues.” We wouldn’t expect anything less from a man that calls a “tax” a “penalty.”
“The American public doesn’t want tax increases; we want government to rein in its overspending,” Palin declared.
“If we can’t stomach modest cuts that would lower federal spending by a mere 0.3% per year out of a current federal budget of $3.6 trillion, then we might as well signal to the whole world that we have no serious intention of dealing with our debt problem,” she added. “If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished.”
Palin concluded her comments by stating:
“We’re going to default eventually
and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”
This is not from a conspiracy
theorist people. This comes from a former State governor and vice presidential
nominee.
However, she did not leave her comments with a sense of hopelessness, but instead encouraged the U.S. to put it’s “fiscal house in order,” to “stop the hysterics, tighten our belts, and take our medicine.”
Previously I wrote about how DHS had continued their stockpile of ammunition solicitations, even while citizens are attempting to acquire ammunition during scarcity in the market.
Recently DHS put in a solicitation for 7,000 “personal defense weapons” that shoot 5.56 NATO ammunition that have “fire select” capability along with high capacity 30 round magazines.
Back in December DHS solicited for 250 million rounds of .40 caliber ammunition. In September, DHS solicited for nearly 200 million rounds of sniper ammunition. In August 750 million rounds of high power ammunition were also solicited and in March DHS solicited 450 million rounds of hollow point bullets.
All of that is true, but to do that our representatives must be held accountable to their oath and that oath is to limited powers of spending. It would also require the people to understand those limitations and start calling their representatives to such limitations and voting out those that do not abide by them. For many, they are more concerned whether their team is in power rather than whether or not that team will obey the law of the land. We can no longer afford to think like that and must demand more from our leaders than mere rhetoric and we must look out for ourselves and our communities, should the feds decide they want to take up arms against the citizens of our country.
However, she did not leave her comments with a sense of hopelessness, but instead encouraged the U.S. to put it’s “fiscal house in order,” to “stop the hysterics, tighten our belts, and take our medicine.”
Previously I wrote about how DHS had continued their stockpile of ammunition solicitations, even while citizens are attempting to acquire ammunition during scarcity in the market.
Recently DHS put in a solicitation for 7,000 “personal defense weapons” that shoot 5.56 NATO ammunition that have “fire select” capability along with high capacity 30 round magazines.
Back in December DHS solicited for 250 million rounds of .40 caliber ammunition. In September, DHS solicited for nearly 200 million rounds of sniper ammunition. In August 750 million rounds of high power ammunition were also solicited and in March DHS solicited 450 million rounds of hollow point bullets.
All of that is true, but to do that our representatives must be held accountable to their oath and that oath is to limited powers of spending. It would also require the people to understand those limitations and start calling their representatives to such limitations and voting out those that do not abide by them. For many, they are more concerned whether their team is in power rather than whether or not that team will obey the law of the land. We can no longer afford to think like that and must demand more from our leaders than mere rhetoric and we must look out for ourselves and our communities, should the feds decide they want to take up arms against the citizens of our country.
SCOTTISH CARDINAL REMOVED
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2013
Alcuin Bramerton Twitter .. WikiLeaks Master Mirror Sites .. #1ab archive
Alcuin Bramerton profile ..... Index of blog contents ..... Home .....#1ab
Picture: Another dodgy cardinal is crapped down the tube. Keith O'Brien.
+%231ab..jpg?SSImageQuality=Full)
On Sunday 24th February 2013, Cardinal Keith O'Brien, the Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh (Scotland), the UK's most senior Roman Catholic cleric, did not turn up for Mass at St Mary's Cathedral in Edinburgh as scheduled.
Intelligence surfaced in the Observer newspaper (London) that same morning that four complaints against O'Brien alleging inappropriate acts against three serving priests and a former priest during the 1980s had been received by the Vatican. The allegations are understood to have been of a homosexual nature.
On Monday 25th February 2013, O'Brien resigned with immediate effect following consultation with the Pope and the Vatican. He had been Archbishop since 1985.
Keith O'Brien's abrupt and unexpected departure left the Scottish Catholic Church confused, disoriented and shocked. Only three out of eight Roman Catholic dioceses in Scotland now have full-time, permanent bishops in charge. More disclosures are expected.
More here (26.02.13), here (26.02.13), here (26.02.13), here(25.02.13), here (25.02.13), here (25.02.13) and here(24.02.13).
Maybe try Romanism?
We are often asked by innocent, impressionable young people, with smartphones in their pockets and Rampant Rabbits in their sportsbags, what, exactly, we think of Roman Churchianity (also known as the Roman Catholic Church).
Our response to these enquiries is always measured, balanced and responsible.
We point out that although the quality of popes has declined recently, and there are no longer the fringe benefits for altar boys which once, in happier times, were enjoyed by many, Roman churchianity is still a hobby worthy of consideration, particularly by those with dark-side antiquarian interests.
If, for example, a modern young person is looking for religion rather than spirituality, then Roman churchianity may well be a live option.
Some well-informed, contemporary authorities say that Roman churchianity is church with the Christianity taken out, and a sprinkle of negative energy and spiritual fascism added in. This is a fair comment, but it is not the whole story.
Certainly, if guilt, sin, sectarianism and dogmatic-style unprotected sex are what you are looking for, then Roman churchianity may be right up your street.
But others say that Roman churchianity is not a thing to get involved with if you are of a nervous disposition and feel uncomfortable with a religion which apes the style of US foreign policy, i.e. one which combines fundamentalist mantras with an all-consuming desire to dominate the weak.
In our view, this is slightly unfair. Many people who, in past centuries, proudly attached their undergarments to the mast of Roman churchianity, have now been reincarnated into quite positive, fun-loving, New Age lives.
And it should not be forgotten, that Roman churchianity generates a good deal of helpful literature. We would notice especially, in this context, the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church. This is a well thought-out book which offers the informed reader many interesting old ideas which can form the basis for a lively, individuated, do-it-yourself church lifestyle. And the book also contains several interesting theories which can be useful as discussion-starters when having a drink with Muslim friends.
In this modern age, Roman churchianity needs all the help it can get. And it is getting a lot of help from the media. This popular support is to be welcomed and trusted.
Kentucky Sheriff Tells White House: Go Ahead Make My Day….
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
CGI's oldBuck: Kentucky Sheriff Tells White House: Go Ahead Make My Day….
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 03:03:51
- See more at: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270671#sthash.lb2uZdgq.dpuf
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 03:03:51
|
Message from SaLuSa by Mike Quinsey - March 1, 2013
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Message from SaLuSa by Mike Quinsey - March 1, 2013
Posted By: Mr.Ed [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 03:31:19
- See more at: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270674#sthash.33AS3Km9.dpuf
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 03:31:19
|
Obama's 2009 Tax Return Says Harrison J Bounel
Obama's 2009 Tax Return Says Harrison J Bounel
Obama's 2009 Tax
Return Says Harrison J Bounel
02/26/13
Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return
submitted by President Barack Obama, he’s the President of the United
States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today.
The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen,
California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it
thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz. The case calls into question many of the
documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as
authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends that the
documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. —
are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama should not have been on the
California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s
electoral votes.
Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward.
We’ll see.
Meantime, on Feb. 4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4th
District Court of Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al
filed by Taitz when she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5
million invalid voter registrations in the State of California. The appeal also
involves Obama’s lack of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on
his forged IDs, stolen Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last
name he’s using is not legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S.
citizen.
Evidence in the case includes:
- A certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s
mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her son’s legal last name to be
Soebarkah, not Obama.
- Obama’s school records from Indonesia, showing his
citizenship to be Indonesian.
- Sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and
investigators, showing Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service
certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by
Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent.
(The SSN failed when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security
Number Verification Service.)
On another legal front, Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols
et al v. Obama et al on Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21
days of being served notice of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony
SSN.
The suit states:
[I]nvestigator Albert Hendershot found in the database of http://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batch-solutions/
the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using.
Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same
Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home
address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social
Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last
changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around
November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative. Database
changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears
that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information,
which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central
District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election
challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state
Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. military.
Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided
the last missing link, link (sic) between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth
of 1890. Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J
Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50
during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit
of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.
There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with
the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related
to Obama. This happens in particular when [George W.] Bush employees leave
their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.
Taitz has asked for expedited default judgment and post judgment
discovery in this case out of fear that any records on hand at the Social
Security office will be destroyed when George W. Bush-appointed Commissioner
Michael Astrue leaves office in February.
Records that might have proven Obama’s Selective Service registration was a
forgery were destroyed in 2009 after Bush-appointed Selective Service Director
William Chatfield resigned, Taitz alleges.
Read more at http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2013/20130226004-obama-2009-return.html?a=2#oQJGd0hhY8AHVKCk.99
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
