Monday, November 24, 2014

TNT NOTES --- Monday, 11/24/14 – Notes by KH

Monday, 11/24/14 – Notes by KH

GOOD MORNING TNT!
T: Doing something different so you understand something. We have some definite info about our timing, some new procedures and why we are feeling as good as we are right now.

[Historical Reference of how we got to where we are today:  We weren’t supposed to be in this, which started 10-11 years ago. I came to do 2 weeks of calls.  At first, the dinar at $0.10 would be a great deal. And I would take that $0.10, and then $1.00 – I’ll take that rate.  I heard about people forming groups, how they were going to get paid before everyone else. So you need to get into a group or you won’t get paid at all. We heard about all of these groups forming, trying to put stuff together and we started finding out who some of thee groups were. Offering diff. rates – ludicrous rates, lying to everyone and then they started charging you to be part of their group or part of their sites, or send your dinar to them.  A lot of crap going on.  Some offered $6.00 to the people and they were getting $12.00 and going to pocket the rest.  It sounded crazy to me.

The big thing – The Chinese this and that. Madame Woo, the Elders control the gov’t. The Chinese doing things, dictating everything that was being done.  A lot of that info was the way it came out and who was putting out the info – the groups – to get more people to join their group. I am not charging anyone, I don’t have any “groups” to bring to them, etc. 
Then, more sources, I got a contract from one of the groups – a contract thru the US with the Chinese. So I said I guess I don’t know everything I thought I knew.  Now the contract from $28.00 and you end up with $18.00 per dinar. I respected them, was in contact with some gov’t agencies that told me that was real.  I had to be convinced of this. 

Then we learned that our gov’t was getting $140 – $150 for each dinar- part of an oil credit deal with China.  Now they are the banks, finance companies – have so much to play with and they can decide who gets what, when and where.  Now agreements with the Chinese and the US Treasury,  The gov’t wants some groups to go through, those already committed to the process – this is part of our slow rollout. All this was part of our growing, getting info, becoming a part of this whole deal.  I know for a fact that a lot of people took their money to Reno and it’s now gone, and they are looking for those people.  I know there are rates well over $30 who got paid, and some in the twenties, and some at $0.50 or $1.50.  That’s how we got to where we are today, where the groups are real and the rates are real.
There is a contract rate with the dong – so high, a crazy rate. I never would have believed it.  It’s crazy that this could even be happening, but it is. Some are still not believing this, but it’s real.
The plan in 2003 to go within 2-3 years. It didn’t work out.  Then a new administration – Obama, and they wanted to do things differently.  They wanted to put their own stamp on it, as being their plan, take the credit for it.  So where do we go from this point on.  Not everyone was supposed to know about this.  That’s why it is being put out there as a scam to deter as many people from being involved.  That makes sense because most could not handle this – sudden wealth

Today, we know some things you don’t now (from my intel team).  I say I don’t care what happens to those 4 million people who are not listening to these calls and paying attention to what is going on. I care about the people listening to this call, who study, have a plan of what to do with their money, how to make their money grow and have a legacy.  I care about these people and want to make sure they are treated fairly.  I understand when the gov’t is doing things the way they are doing things, even though it doesn’t make sense to those who know the background of what the dinar was supposed to do for our country or the world’s economy. 
Now the next step of the process – B of A was to be THE BANK, and then Citibank, then back to Wells Fargo who is the lead bank. Only one bank has a requirement to exchange everyone and anyone, but every bank has the OPTION to exchange who they want. 
So how do we do this payout – who gets paid first, second and third.  Last year they paid themselves – politicians, family and friends, and even one of their maids who got a Bentley from her boss as payment.
We know people doing the payouts, who got the lists, and now there are people within arms length who are getting paid out. So I know they are picking everyday people. Some only had 100,000 dinar who exchanged, and some with several million dinar exchanged.

There were 327 groups, some consisted of 5-10 people, who went through the process. All of those groups have almost all been done except for the larger groups and the ones they could have some legal issues with, due to possible criminal activity.  They save the worst for last of those groups, and the there is US.  That’s where we are.] (end of Historical Reference)
****************************************************
Tony:We are excited, Iraq is excited. We are down to the last of the 4-window opportunities to get paid out.  I am telling you right now I only give it 25% chance that we will get paid out with the RV today. There is some news coming out of Iraq which is saying that this could be the one!

DC: I was surprised you told this story, and thanks for telling it. Common sense – I firmly believe that all folks, including the 4-5 million others who don’t pay attention, I believe that everyone is going to get paid.  The vast majority will get paid at $3.58 – the int’l rate.  It’s going to be painless, anti-climatic, simple process.  Why do I believe they will not screw folks out of anything – I don’t believe they are that deceitful.  I know it is something we are hearing consistently from a lot of the folks, but those we talk to and the politicians who know and are participating in this do not want anyone to be left out. 


Tony: I support DC’s statements.  WE don’t want anyone to be left behind, but my real concern is the guys who are here listening.

East to West:  Iraq news – The CBI says it’s ready.  Finance ministers requesting the CBI removes the 000s immediately, playing for the past 2 days.  CBI is ready to implement the 000 reforms, complete the currency reforms, etc.  They pulled people in all through these processes. Dignitaries are getting involved. Parliament doing a great job. ISIS is lessening.  Abadi is getting accolades for his great way of working with others and bringing them together.  The training has some of the top guys from the CBI, the Finance ministers, and Abadi made an appearance.  Dr. Shabibi was there.  Quite a surprise to those there.
Even today they talked about the news – pay attention, at the evening mosques saying this, which is quite unusual.  Their timeline is usually very laid back. 
USA-  UN jumping up and down to get this done. BIS/IMF – keeping everyone in lineThe UST and finance guys – say a lot more folks went through this weekend and continue to go through today.  A lot of these people are getting $3.58.  We understand that the contract rate pool is still available – don’t know how much longer.
The plan in place to have Dinarians go through initially when Iraq goes through and then everyday folks go through a week later. How to do this? Set up appts.  Some appts. could take 10 days to 2 weeks.  Atlanta and D.C. people have the most dinars holders.  If in Atlanta, it’s going to be awhile before you get in. Prepare yourself for Dec. 5th, 6th, 7th, before you get in.  I feel that if I had an appt., I would feel better – just to get this over with..

Tony: Last week the plan was to try and rush everyone through by Thanksgiving.  We have been saying if you just give people an appt. and it takes 10-15 days to get in, who cares.  So this morning, that is now the plan, to get everyone an 800# to be calling by Thanksgiving, even though the appt. could be a week or two later.
Bank people are at the banks. Ready to goWe are waiting right now for a phone call to say that they are doing it.  We are waiting for Pam to give us some info.

DC: The alternate plan, can I mention this Pam?
Quick synopsis, Iraq goes today or tonight, some folks here will take time to get through, needing appts.
Alternate Plan – been raised by very credible sources – to continue to allow back handed exchanges maybe some Dinarland stuff but not even allow appts. until Dec. 5th and let Iraq do what it wants to do. That’s a plan on there too, been talked about by some credible people.

Tony: We could get the numbers today, get all the 800#s by Thanksgiving, make your appt., could take 10-15 days to get into the bank.

Other option – get the 800#s, but they finish with the VIP and those on the lists and not even start with Dinarland until Dec. 5thThey will stop before Christmas and not start up again until after the New Year. 
We just want to get in before Christmas one way or the other.  I try to look at every angle so that I can understand it and it makes more sense. and then we see the big picture.  Now you guys know why I said what I said about not being completely concerned with those not listening to these calls or paying attention to this.

Caller:650-  Is Plan A for groups and Dinarland?

DC: Yes, the rest of the big groups will go through and they are guesstimating that the other Dinarland people will get to exchange, with appts. made up to Christmas break.

 
C: Is nothing happens by tomorrow morning, what is your take on that? 

T: I told you I give them 25% chance this will happen. 

DC: I get confused if they have Iraq ready at this readiness level and then this would not go – after dangling the carrot and then jerking it back.  I don’t get why they would do this.  They wouldn’t be acting like this if they weren’t pretty damn serious about this getting done now.


Caller: Are the 3 other currencies still in the basket? 

DC: They are as of now. (Dong, Rupiah and Zimbabwe)

Tony: Gotta say something – I am going to be in LA on Dec. 18th, going to Will Smith’s club, Nick Cannon, who own a club and are doing an event down there called Smoove Nights.  It’s a hip-hop thing.  If we don’t get to meet anywhere else, you can maybe meet me there.  My nephew is part of this.  Go to BeSmoove.com. 

DC:  You are too funny! LOL

Caller:601- DC: TAX RATE?  We are hoping for and expectant that the tax rates will be different. In some groups they have arranged a pre-tax agreement and we hope that this will be for all of us. By April, 2015, we will know for sure what the tax rates will be for sure.

RE: NDAs, in there, there is a line for your tax advisers, atty and most advisers.  I have 4-5 good friends who I am asking to sign those NDAs to not talk about my wealth. 

Tony: Tell your close relatives who know about this that you have, not to be specific about your transactions.

DC: The law enforcement just doesn’t want people blasting it out everywhere. 


Caller: 252- Tony: My kids have their own dinar and I have been stressing to them not to talk about it to anyone, and stay out of the limelight. 

Caller:212- DC: Because the US has so many people, it’s up to their discretion how they push everyone through. 

(DC just read a text – Much more encouraging news out of Iraq. )


DC: Re: Reserves at bank appt., as long as you bought the reserves before you go to the appt,, you should be okay.  But buying reserves after you made the appt., will not be okay. Just take all of your paperwork with you to the bank.


C: Banks might not cash in our zim unless we are in an exchange exit contract?

Tony: I don’t know anything about any restrictions on it. 

C: IS THE RATE GOING TO BE ON FOREX?

DC: Good question – quick answer, it will eventually wind up on Forex – Will it be in a few days, or 15 days or not until January 1st?  We don’t know for sure.
Tony: If they don’t want the banks to be competitive, don’t want the rates to be changing several times a day – if they want to avoid all of that, they would wait. It’s not what we want to hear, but that would make sense.  They call us exchanging in 10-15 days, rushing us through.
Dong rate:  $ 1.02 – the last I got.

Tony – re: closing the Currency Exchangers down – I don’t know how they can do that with it’s someone’s business.  It won’t concern us because it will be after our time. I don’t know how they will justify it.

Caller:410- Will all of the banks have exactly the same rates? 

Tony: If it’s not on Forex, everyone should have the same rate, but I don’t know what options they will offer you, including a different rate.

Caller:719- If they let it go today or tomorrow, before Thanksgiving, if we are in a good area, we should be able to get in.

DC: Option A Iraq will get done today, tomorrow, very quickly.  The U.S. will continue to process their people, some could take 10-15 days depending on how many people there own dinars to exchange. 
Option B: You are not going to get an appt. until Dec. 5th or after, so sit back and relax, don’t sweat it.  With Iraq going through now, then they will have to start the U.S. process, then they will stop during Christmas season and start up again in January.
DC: Those Exchange Centers will be able to go at a much quicker pace if it’s on Forex, moreso than the banks.  On Forex means it’s fluctuating.  Without Forex, it will be a flat rate of $3.58.

C: I feel like we are being excluded and controlled. 

DC: I feel the same way, but if we get to exchange, we should just grin and bear it.
DC: Even after the RV, a lot of the banks won’t know about this,. There is one bank averaging about 2,600 exchanges a day, in Atlanta. They don’t want any of their wealth managers to know anything about this, even after this.

Tony: Before, every bank was going to take everybody.  Now there is only one bank that has to take everyone.  And this bank is planning on dumping some after they exchange, so you had better have another place to put your money. Most banks want long-term clients, not the ones who will take out their money quickly anyway.

C: Are we still able to take the one 25k dinar note and exchange it before the rest of our dinars. 

Tony/DC: Don’t know. We’ll have to wait to get the package and ask that question.

C: The Mormon church is telling their parishioners to go out and buy dinar – would be a good investment – to help the church and the people.

Caller:786-  DC:  The cities with the most dinar holders:  Atlanta – huge, D.C. –huge, New York area – big.  Dallas – a ton, Chicago – not that much. Denver – not that much. SF, LA – not that much based on size of the cities,  If you have a lot of evangelical churches or military bases, you are going to have a lot of exchanges going on.  Nashville will be a quicker place.

Caller:  Reno – a banking center in the U.S.  They did a lot of things there, stored a lot of money, set up a lot of things there.  So that they could “subvert a lot of laws” in Reno. This is why Reno was selected for many. 

Tony: They won’t let me exchange in Reno. I am not happy about it, but I understand it.

DC: Several Senators and Representatives don’t know about this.  If you are on the taxing committee, they better know about this. 

SUMMARY:
DC: Everything looks really good, got more news during this call saying this is queued up ready to go in Iraq.  We have 2 options. The quick one – start making appts. now, based on the congestion in your city now soon you get in. Other option – not till later.  Have a plan before you spend your money.

Pam: Was reading an article – Be Careful Who You Admire and Trust – They May be a Complete Fake - 

Ray: Marvelous Monumental Monday – enjoy it.

Tony: WE got some good info while on the call here. Looks like things are moving forward. I am not counting on it until I hear the speech IN PAST TENSE in Iraq.  If it’s true, have a great week. Process is rolling out. Today was a call about being transparent throughout the whole process.  Be prepared for either of these 2 scenarios.  It means we are still getting paid and getting the higher rates.  Those who are not following this will have to wait until after Christmas.  I am excited about that. We have at least one more call that I know of, sending out the 800# and we look forward to that.

End Of Call

White House Quietly Releases Plans For 3,415 Regulations Ahead Of Thanksgiving Holiday

White House Quietly Releases Plans For 3,415 Regulations Ahead Of Thanksgiving Holiday
Daily Calle

White House Quietly Releases Plans For 3,415 Regulations Ahead Of Thanksgiving Holiday

While Americans are focused on what delicious foods they’re going to eat for Thanksgiving, the White House is focused on releasing its massive regulatory agenda — marking the fifth time the Obama administration has released its regulatory road map on the eve of a major holiday.
The federal Unified Agenda is the Obama administration’s regulatory road map, and it lays out thousands of regulations being finalized in the coming months. Under President Barack Obama, there has been a tradition of releasing the agenda late on Friday — and right before a major holiday.
“It’s become an unfortunate tradition of this administration and others to drop these regulatory agendas late on a Friday and right before a holiday,” Matt Shudtz, executive director of the Center for Progressive Reform, told The Hill newspaper.
The White House’s regulatory agenda for spring 2014 was released on the eve of the Memorial Day weekend, when millions of people set out on weekend getaways or family vacations.
“It’s unfortunate because it’s an update on protections for Americans of all stripes,” Shudtz told the Hill. “It lays out the administration’s plan and it deserves more attention.”
But the White House may have a good reason to do so because its Unified Agenda for fall 2014 includes some 3,415 regulations– more than the last regulatory agenda, and one that includes 189 rules that cost more than $100 million.
One of the most contentious rules is the Environmental Protection Agency rules to limit greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing power plants. According to the agenda, these rules will be finalized in 2015.
They have been criticized by Republicans and the coal industry for accelerating the demise of coal-fired power and for setting the stage for increases in electricity prices. Republicans, who are set to take control of the Senate next year, have vowed to fight EPA regulations.
“The president said his policies were on the ballot, and the American people spoke up against them,” said incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican. “It’s time for more listening, and less job-destroying red tape. Easing the burden already created by EPA regulations will continue to be a priority for me in the new Congress.”
But environmental groups and the EPA argue the rule will actually help lower utility bills and help fight global warming.
“The good news is that we can afford to tackle the growing threat of climate change and, really, we can’t afford not to,” said Starla Yeh, a policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Doing the right thing will save money even as we protect our health, our communities and future generations.”
A more pressing EPA rule set to be finalized is the so-called coal ash rule for coal-fired power plants. A final rule will be issued by Dec. 19, and could be bad news for the power sector, which will bear the brunt of $20.3 billion in compliance costs.
But probably the most fought-over rules to be finalized by the EPA next year will be its redefining of the “Waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. The EPA will issue its redefinition next year, according to the agenda.
Federal lawmakers from both parties, along with companies from virtually every sector of the economy, have opposed the rule, saying it greatly expands the EPA’s power to regulate even small bodies of water on private property.
“The ‘waters of the U.S.’ rule may be one of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history,” said Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter, adding “they want to take another step toward outright permitting authority over virtually any wet area in the country, while at the same time providing a new tool for environmental groups to sue private property owners.”
But the EPA says the rule is needed to clear up uncertainty over the EPA’s jurisdiction in the wake of two Supreme Court rulings. The EPA says “the decisions established important considerations for how those regulations should be interpreted” and that “[e]xperience implementing the regulations following the two court cases has identified several areas that could benefit from additional clarification through rulemaking.”

BREAKING!!!!!!! WHITE HOUSE: Latest attempts to HIDE TRUTH (Hagel Forced out)

BREAKING!!!!!!!  WHITE HOUSE: Latest attempts to HIDE TRUTH (Hagel Forced out)
Hagel "fed up with micromanagement from the White House"... 'Muslim extremist - ISIS' is an “imminent threat to every interest we have....this is beyond anything we’ve ever seen.”

 
 
image
 
 
 
 
 
An Obama Admin Official Dared Tell A Truth Obama Want...
"Obviously, Obama couldn't handle all the criticism..."
Preview by Yahoo
 

Property Owners triumph

 “The court’s decision confirms what we have said all along: the federal government has no business interfering with property rights where the allegedly endangered species has no connection to, or effect on, interstate commerce,”


This is exactly what the Firearms Freedom act was about. Commerce Clause overreach. It also shows how important property rights are. This could also be applied to the Bundy ranch situation where the Desert Tortoise is excuse for the Feds to cause all the problems. 




Subject: Property Owners triumph

District court ruling defends property rights against Endangered Species Act...

By Aaron Martin  |  November 7, 2014

District court
        ruling defends property rights against Endangered Species Act
Sen. Orrin Hatch
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) applauded a federal court’s decision on Thursday to strike down Endangered Species Act regulations that limit the rights of property owners.
A district court in Utah ruled that restricting the “taking” of prairie dogs, which are listed as endangered species, exceeded power given to the federal government under the Commerce and Necessary and Necessary and Proper clauses, the Washington Post reports.
Hatch said he is “glad” that the court stepped in to protect the property rights of Utahns.
“I’ve worked on this issue for a long time, and this decision is a direct result of the tremendous efforts of the members of People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners, the Pacific Legal Foundation, the Iron County Commission and the people of Iron County,” Hatch said. “This is the first time a federal court has found that Endangered Species Act regulations limiting the taking of a listed species exceed the scope of Congress’s enumerated powers.”
In 2012, Hatch, the chairman of the Senate Western Caucus’s Public Lands Subcommittee, visited affected properties and coordinated visits for officials with the Fish and Wildlife Service.
“The court’s decision confirms what we have said all along: the federal government has no business interfering with property rights where the allegedly endangered species has no connection to, or effect on, interstate commerce,” Hatch said. “I will continue to fight the federal government’s unnecessary intrusions in the state of Utah.”


Kirk MacKenzie
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DRA news digest is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won't hear
on TV. It covers topics of direct relevance to Rural America. Subscribe emailing me a request.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



FBI Confirmed 42% of Congress Active Pedophiles! Many More Secrets Exposed!

FBI Confirmed 42% of Congress Active Pedophiles! Many More Secrets Exposed!

Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:41


Excerpt: 
There have been two different secret LE investigations of pedophilia among Members of Congress. One was by an undercover FBI Asset, and another was for the NYCPD and the New York State Crime Commission. The first found that approximately 39% were active practicing pedophiles. the second found that about 42% were active practicing pedophiles. These figures were from reliable investigations about 20 years ago, but current LE experts say that not much has changed except for perhaps more S&M and secret homosexuality. At least one Southern Senator who lives a secret “closeted” life lives in fear that his lifestyle will be revealed by the “AIPAC Boys” who pull his strings, if he fails to satisfy their middle east war mongering demands.
Right now major evidence has been emerging of very high level pedophilia and ritual murder of children by Top Politicians and Government Officials in the UK, all covered up by Scotland Yard. Since highly connected Jimmy Saville died, significant evidence he provided kids to the upper crust and even some of the Royalty in England has emerged. This evil pedophile/child murder in the UK  scandal is monstrous and cannot be contained even though top officials and Police Officials are desperate to do so.
Those who live by the Janus Principle walk a tight rope and can only keep their secrets from the public because they own and control the major mass media.
Those Psychopaths who have an uncanny ability to deliver their much needed positive public image or persona while engaging in obviously criminally insane acts which are so psychopathically self-serving and evil actually walk a tight rope between being prosecuted and skating. Those who climb the Establishment hierarchy to sufficiently high positions receive increased protection from the law as they rise, but they also tend to perform more hidden criminally psychopathic acts since they now have the power to do so.
If they ever displease their peer group of Top Policy-Makers, they can be exposed for some of what they have done publicly and “thrown to the wolves”.  Those who do so are best described as good cons or confidence engendering folks. Those who fail and cannot process reality properly eventually end up in Jail.
If these “Rising Stars” are judged as suitable candidates to groom for the very highest levels, they are typically “set up” to be tested to see if they can participate in various forms of compromise or evil. If they refuse to participate for any reason, whether it from too much character or an intrinsic aversion, they are sidelined and never taken any higher in the Establishment Hierarchy.
Many of these Talking Head Establishment Liars (ELs) also learn that there is a very Dark Side to all that is behind the news even before they start to move up the Establishment Hierarchy on their way to a high position, but they are instinctive and they are street smart enough to look the other way and to keep looking the other way in order to preserve their careers.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/22/evil-with-a-nice-face-the-janus-principal/
***********************
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HNqIrDKnNE8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BfNqhV5hg4&feature=player_embedded


BAR ASSOCIATION HISTORY & WHO OWNS THE U.S.

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 
BAR ASSOCIATION HISTORY & WHO OWNS THE U.S.
Posted By: Lymerick
Date: Monday, 24-Nov-2014 15:22:00

BAR ASSOCIATION HISTORY & WHO OWNS THE U.S.
{THE REAL AMERICAN HISTORY NOT TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS ON THE 227th ANNIVERSARY OF THE FIRST 4th Of July 1776} History of "BAR ASSOCIATIONS" The Crown Temple Secret Society of theThird Way Order by Rule of Mystery Babylon. The Templars of the Crown.
The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the "Crown," which is a private foreign power. Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A. , this is a different "Crown" and is fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the "Crown." From this point on, we will also refer to the Crown as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, all three being synonymous.
First, a ......snip... ... between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple " Church " is outside any Canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution. All licensed Bar Attorneys -Attorners (see definitions below) ­ in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple , realizing this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London.
Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S. , such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown. The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800's, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below).
They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers. The present Queen of England is not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown orCrown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.
The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not bedictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawn broker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery – the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful -contracts on the American people.
The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary. Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code.
Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts. "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." -Matthew 23:27
By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being "constitutional" when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? Is it any wonder the states and her people have no justice as they dwellupon the land? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple. The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London.
The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world.
Definitions You Never Knew:
ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996.
ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn,or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
ESQUIRE, n. [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary
RULE n. 1 [C] a statement aboutwhat must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation.
REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules ofbehavior. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode.
ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -NewburyHouse Dictionary ©1999.
CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court .] 4. A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt.[Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.
COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
BIG SNIP - MORE INFO AT LINK

SHOW ME THE LAW!! INTERNAL REVENUE LAWS WERE REPEALED

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

SHOW ME THE LAW!! INTERNAL REVENUE LAWS WERE REPEALED
Posted By: Lymerick
Date: Monday, 24-Nov-2014 14:42:43

Internal Revenue Laws Were Repealed
By Al Thompson althompsonca@cs.com
December 11th, 2003
Background
When Congress passes laws, there is a very specific procedure that they follow. Laws are enacted by either a Bill or a Resolution that may originate in the House or the Senate. “A bill that has been agreed to in an identical form by both bodies becomes the law of the land only after: 1. Presidential approval; or 2. failure by the President to return it with objections to the House in which it originated within 10 days, (Sundays excepted) while Congress is in session; or 3. the overriding of a presidential veto by two-thirds vote in each House.”
For a full explanation see
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/lawsmade.bysec/formsofaction.html
Once a bill or resolution is enacted it must be published. “One of the important steps in the enactment of a valid law is the requirement that it shall be made known to the people who are bound by it.” This makes sense, since the people must have a place to refer to, in order to find out what their obligations are, if any, to the Government.
When the bills and resolutions are enacted, they are first published as a “slip law”, which means they are published in an “unbound pamphlet.”
These slip laws become “competent evidence” in all federal and state courts, tribunals, and public offices.
They then become published in the United States Statutes at Large, and these are “legal evidence” of the laws, and are accepted as proof of the laws in any court in the United States.
For a full explanation see: http://Thomas.loc.gov/home/lawsmade.bysec/publication.html
The statutes are then codified by the Law Revision Counsel of the House of Representatives. The codes become “prima facie” evidence of the law, and they stand as law, unless rebutted or challenged. However, the codes are not law, but simply prima facie (on its face) evidence of the law. This kind of evidence should be rebutted or challenged, especially when dealing with any alleged internal revenue code.
However, when communicating with the Internal Revenue Service, literally thousands upon thousands of people have been asking the simple question, “Show me the law”, and have been stonewalled by that agency without any apparent recourse. People have been thrown in prison for violating a “law” that hasn’t been disclosed when demanded.
Why does this happen? It would seem to be obvious, that the Government would put forth the law when requested. Why don’t they do it? I submit that the reason is these laws simply do not exist because they were repealed in 1939. Yes, that is correct; the internal revenue laws were repealed in that year.
Internal Revenue Laws Were Repealed 1 / 12
It Happened February 10th, 1939.
Look at Exhibit A, it is a copy of the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE February 10th, 1939 [H. R. 2762] [Public, No 1] Chapter 2 at Section 4. it says the following: “…all such laws and parts of laws codified herein, to the extent they relate exclusively to internal revenue, are repealed, effective, except as provided in Sec. 5.”
Section 5 “Continuance of Existing Law Any provision of law in force on the 2nd day of January 1939 corresponding to a provision contained in the Internal Revenue Title shall remain in force until the corresponding provision under such Title takes effect.”
What just happened? It appears that indeed, the internal revenue laws were repealed and saved in the Internal Revenue Title for use to preserve the rights and liabilities that occurred when these internal revenue laws were in effect. But since they were repealed, they no longer applied, after the date of enactment, to anyone unless the liability occurred before the enactment of this statute. In other words, they were moved to the Internal Revenue Title for savings or archive purposes, and that they only applied to those who incurred a liability before the date of enactment. The Internal Revenue Title thus contained repealed law.
Now look at Exhibit B, which is Public Law 591-Chapter 736, approved August 16th, 1954, H.R. 8300 which is called Internal Revenue Code of 1954. On the eleventh line down it states, “To revise the internal revenue laws of the United States.” What laws? The laws in the Internal Revenue Title were repealed laws. So what did they revise? They revised nothing. They did indeed give the perception that these laws were being enacted, however, it would be a legislative impossibility given the normal procedures Congress uses to enact laws. Remember, Congress enacts laws, they do not enact Codes. Codes are written by codifiers, and they are an index to make it easier and more orderly to find the law.
As I understand this, Congress can only revise codes, but they amend statutes and statutes are the publication of the laws. So it appears to be what some call a “legislative orphan.” It didn’t follow the normal process Congress uses to enact laws. We can only surmise that Congress pulled a fast one and made it appear that the internal revenue laws were “revised”, when the truth of the matter is that they attempted to “enact” a statute based upon repealed law. The lawmaking process does not work that way. Congress cannot amend repealed laws; they would have to enact new ones.
If the internal revenue laws were repealed, and that appears to be the fact, what does this mean? Did Congress do this on purpose? Or did it happen over a period of time between 1939 and 1954. What did they know, and when did they know it? We may never be able to answer that question, but we do know that they did it, and the law still stands today.
Many in the “tax honesty” movement have been saying over and over again, “Show me the law…” and the government remains silent. The more complete question is: Show me the law that makes me liable for the tax. And again, the government remains silent. It is because there is no law, and the government knows it. If they actually pointed to a purported liability, it would be a gross error, or worse, a complete lie.
I’ve had two occasions myself and I asked the question to IRS officials, “Please tell me what statute, code, or regulation that makes me liable for the tax, and I got nothing but silence. One IRS appeals officer told me, “I don’t have to answer that, that’s compelled testimony.”
Internal Revenue Laws Were Repealed 2 / 12
Therefore, since the internal revenue laws were repealed, what is the purpose in studying the codes? Nothing. Why study codes that are not supported by law? It doesn’t make any sense. It appears that the process of studying codes occurs because people think that they are law, but the reality is that they may or may not be an accurate representation of law. One should always demand the underlying statute before answering any complaint or charge. Remember, the “slip laws” are competent evidence, the statutes are legal evidence, and the codes are prima facie evidence of the law. If someone is dealing with an IRS issue, I would most certainly demand to see the slip laws along with the statutes.
In fact, the Department of Justice states the following: “The text of all statutes alleged to have been violated, including the penalty provision, and the pertinent statute of limitations should be typed out in full either in the body of the prosecutor's affidavit or as exhibits to the prosecutor's affidavit. If attached as an exhibit, each statute should be typed on a separate page. If the text of the pertinent statute is unusually long or convoluted, contact the Office of International Affairs regarding the possibility of reduction. It is usually not necessary to also include the applicable provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines.”
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00607.htm
In almost every instance I have seen in income or employment tax cases, there is no lawful affidavit sworn by a competent witness and there is no statute included in any charge/claim. Many people have been put in jail, based upon unsworn charges with no statutes.
Therefore, it is essential that the statutes be included in any kind of charge, and this is something that overlooked in the cases I’ve seen. Why? In the case of the internal revenue laws, it appears they were repealed in 1939 and no new internal revenue laws were enacted. The government attorneys simply move their process forward because we don’t challenge their presentments,
Any charges from the federal government that does not include lawfully enacted statutes are nothing more than merit less, frivolous, charges that are meant to embarrass, oppress, harass, and intimidate the people.
How was this fact pasted over by so many researchers? The power of breaking a belief that one has held most of their life is quite difficult to break.
About two years ago, at a research meeting in Oklahoma, Jack Cohen, from Washington state, pointed out this fact of the 1939 internal revenue laws were repealed. Yes, we’ve been sitting on this for two years, but we just didn’t realize the implications. Jack held up the book to all the researchers. They all looked at it, but then they completely forgot about it and carried on with little discussion. I was there, and since the other researchers didn’t have much of an interest, I thought maybe there was not much merit to Jack’s statement. But I kept thinking that if what Jack said was true, then we don’t have to go through all this other material, if the internal revenue laws were repealed. Why are we studying codes if there is no law? Even now, with the evidence in my hands, it is still hard to believe, but the statutes speak for themselves. It is our knowledge and understanding that seems to be subject to our old ways of thinking.
Therefore, unless we’re missing something, it appears that indeed the internal revenue laws were repealed and that may be one of the reasons that the government refuses to “show me the law”. There isn’t one.
Copyright by Al Thompson under the Common Law December 11th, 2003
This article may be freely distributed in its entirety.
Internal Revenue Laws Were Repealed 3 / 12
MORE INTERNAL REVENUE INFO
The last action arising under the laws codified in the Code of 1939 was finalized some time after 1960 and before 1966. West's Code Annotated included the 1939 Code in its 1955 edition, and provided Pocket Parts until 1960. The 1939 Code was not included in the 1966 edition. Congress has never enacted any new internal revenue laws since 1939. So the alleged Code of 1954 is not a "code of laws". Its provisions have no statutory foundation. It is, at best, a code of municipal ordinances.
Also note:
Treasury Order (TO) 150-01 created 33 Districts and 4 Regional offices under the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. TO 150-02, which cancelled 150-01, legally closed all 37 offices created by TO 150-01
Therefore, The Commissioner is not authorized to collect taxes, but if he were, it would only be in the District of Columbia.
4 USC 72 says that all offices attached to the seat of the government are to be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as expressly provided by law. The Secretary's office is attached to the seat of the government, and so is the Commissioner's. No law provides authority for the Commissioner to operate outside the District, so his activities and functions are limited to that area. No Delegation Order authorizes him to collect taxes, so anyone under his supervision is likewise limited.
The Secretary has not delegated the "authority to levy" to the Commissioner, or the "authority to file lien claims." The Secretary has delegated all authority to "enforce" the "internal revenue laws" to the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
Also, keep in mind that the word "Internal" is used for a purpose. The word having the opposite meaning is "external." We know the INTERNAL REVENUE CODE and the Internal Revenue Laws were not created for those who are external, or outside government. Therefore, we can conclude that it was created for "internal" purposes, to collect from those who receive a benefit from within the government structure. It is a tax to be collected from those who are employed by it, who are now re-"venued". Their venue has changed from state to federal. Working within government is a benefit and or privilege that can be or is taxable. Something like a kickback.
BIG SNIP-MORE DETAILS AT LINK