Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Rebuttal Versus Reclamation -- Exodus to the Land


by Anna Von Reitz


The Twelve Steps I published some time ago are rebuttals to presumptions that are being held against DEFENDANTS in court cases addressed to the "CITIZEN" named after you.  These presumptions are fatal and result in being held guilty 100% of the time if they are not answered and rebutted---- and nobody tells you they exist, so, guess what?  The conviction rate in these "Debt Collection Courts" runs 98%. 
Those steps are not going to set you free or reclaim your estate or get you back on the land, though they do increase your chances of escaping a conviction if you are already snarled into one of their courts. 
The means to getting your estate reclaimed is the subject of the past year of work by me and the whole Living Law Firm team and I can now safely say that the fundamental process to deliver yourself back to the land jurisdiction is fairly simple:
1. Do an adult name change from the NAME---- JOHN MICHAEL DOE, for example, to the Upper and Lower Case name styled like this:  John Michael Doe.  This is the correct English Grammar and the correct Christian appellation and you need no more reason than this to do it.
2. The name change costs around $150 and takes 60-90 days on average. Immediately after receiving the final name change decree from the court, issue a Deed of Acknowledgement, Acceptance, and Re-conveyance Without Consideration and record it with the Land Recording Office.  Take a certified copy back to the Clerk of Court and have it recorded and made part of the case file at the court, too.  You have now come full circle and advised the court of your action in return.
The verbiage is very simple.  Here's  an example:
"On this 18th day of July in the Anno Domini year 2016 I have received and do accept my own Trade Name doing business as John Michael Doe and do re-convey it to Lawful Jurisdiction and its native domicile on the soil and land of the wyoming state and do place this Deed upon the Public Record in token of my action."
Notice--- you seize upon the Name as soon as it is decreed to be yours, and reconvey it to the "soil and land" of the organic state.  You can either say "organic state" or you can write the name in all small letters. 
You are now in fully agreed upon possession of your own given name and you have removed it back to the land jurisdiction.  You have also identified it as a "Trade Name" and not a "Foreign Situs Trust" so that the rats can't pretend otherwise and do a repeat of the FDR Fraud. 
In simply doing this you have "reoccupied" the land jurisdiction of Wyoming and begun the process of coming home.
Do that much for yourself and your family and your country and over half the battle is won, because this finally gives you the solid ground and standing with which to assert your identity and begin the process of reclaiming the rest of your property.
---------------------------------------
See this article and over 300 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.  

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anna said the name was personage.
No one knows what has been done in the name to claim ownership of all that comes with it. Where is her and the living law firm people's claim and why July 18, 2016 on an Aug 3rd 2016 post?

Anonymous said...

Two moms on a burough.
The man says it's a crime to take that Social Security money.
Anyone claiming that name after knowing it's been used to pilfer the social security account are going to be dealing with a lot more in the next 60 - 90 days for claiming that name.

The name you are called is yours already.
When I want to talk to you, I call your name, I don't hold up a piece of paper with your name on it and wait for you to see it to know I want to talk to you. I call your name.

The bible if you look at any birth, look at who's born, and see it says he was called Adam, he was called Noah, he is called Jacob....called.
Have a calling.

Anna has not been clear what her intentions are.
I am not going to say anything except, what you do, and what you sign, if you do it of your free will, you can not blame anyone else.

The claim above has to be made by an 'adult'.
Most of you don't study this to know the significance of that statement and Anna has not explained it.
She gives you just enough for you to do it, and when the 'sh' hits the fan, how will you reach her for remedy and for answers?

You never do anything you don't understand, unless you are just reckless with your life and will 'follow any leader'.
Most of you know that you will follow anyone who appears to be a leader and will guide you.

I see people wanting to form groups all the time, as soon as one form of government is gotten rid of, a group of people will jump into another group of control, and then have something to complain about their leader. It's just in some people's programming.

In the two moms and a burough, the woman said her grandson had 400 warrants in his name before he was 10 years old.
Imagine as an adult, claiming that name, and then all the people holding those papers of indebtness coming after you to make their claim for what is promised by that name.

They will be suing you for what was promised because they don't know who had the name before, they just know you have the name now.

You were told of personage and you accepted it of your free will.
You were told of barratry and you go to court to work with the BAR to take the name they bastardized of your free will.
Your own personal hell will be of your free will.

Anna said you are a victim of fraud and identity theft, and you will claim that identity and no longer be a victim of the fraud and of identity theft, you will be a party to what happened in that name.

One of many audios of the fraud of the name

If you have time to learn just one aspect of the dangers of doing what was suggested.

Anna made no promise and did not communicate under penalty of perjury.
In her world, as a judge, what she gave was an 'opinion'.
Notice how their courts ignore the Supreme Court decisions? Cause those words from the Supreme Court is not an 'order', its an 'Opinion'.

I'm not going to tell anyone what to do with their life.
Caution is what anyone with some sense of not trying to claim that estate the way it's thrown at you half-azd.

Like a pandora's box, or like a Indiana Jones movie where someone opens the Ark of the Covenant and have no idea how little time they have to bask in the glory that Ark provided before it claimed their life.

Just study.
Two moms and a burough had an audio about how they used a name to buy lots of properties that people did not have possession of, but the county attorney owned in their name.

IRS may be all over anyone who starts claiming what they created, without having the protections and immunities they had when they created it.

I am not replying to this post. It's an opinion, and not under penalty of perjury.

penny4yerthoughts said...

think of your car, when you register your car with the STATE and they give you a certificate or bill of lading, do you now own it or does the STATE own the genuine title and place it in a trust? or the mortgage? or baby YOU???

Anonymous said...

Who is this Judge?
Judge Darby from what I seen is a real superior court district Judge in the state of oregon.

He cites actual law and what clause it's found under. He agrees with this Anna only partially, and says nothing about filing a claim to take possession of names.

Like many have asked before, just who is this Office Judge??

Anonymous said...

From what I have studied, the name of a child was registered into the public collective. When we become of age we must claim the name as our property and have it removed from the public as we are private individuals. The public name gave the child rights that the state could enforce against the parental guardians if they did something to harm the child. A man that is of lawful age has no need or want of the State benefits and privileges, he has real law to protect his property. How to accomplish this is the real test of a man.