Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Pre WW2 replay to create WW3 - Propaganda and Lies against Russia



One Hundred Christians Are Locked In Shipping Containers And Forced To Bake In The Hot Sun


According to a recent story coming out of Eritrea, approximately 100 Christians were rounded up and placed in shipping containers by authorities:
Eritrea’s persecution of Christians escalated throughout May, resulting in as many as 100 believers being arrested, a watchdog reported. Prisoners are often kept in “horrific” storage container jails where they are deprived of basic necessities.
“They’re rounded up and put into storage container prisons many times. Eritrea is on the eastern side of the continent of Africa where it gets extremely hot. These people are sometimes locked in storage containers with very little air ventilation and up to 120 degree heat,” Open Doors USA’s Emily Fuentes explained in an article for Mission Network News on Friday, describing the conditions the Christian prisoners are facing.
“[They] often get sick from the lack of hygiene in these places, and often don’t get the food they require to stay nourished. So it’s a horrific place for Christians who don’t fall into the approved denominations.”
Fuentes pointed out that “paranoid government crackdowns” led to the arrests of close to 100 Christians last month as authorities carried out door-to-door interrogations seeking to hunt down worshipers that fall outside the four recognized religious denominations.
Although members of Sunni Islam, Orthodox Christian, Catholic Christian, and Evangelical Lutheran groups are allowed to worship in the African country, those who fall outside these denominations are considered criminals.
International Christian Concern confirmed the persecution, stating: “Though Eritrea does allow four denominations to practice their faith they keep a close control on them. For those Christians that meet in their homes or do not belong to the approved denominations the punishment is extremely high. These Christians are rounded up and stuffed into storage containers without air ventilation and with little food.” (source)
A terrible story indeed. But could there be more to this story than what is being presented, and perhaps something with sinister intentions? Let’s take a step back from this story and look a little closer.

Eritrea is a country that was formed formally in 1993 by separating from what was the northeastern part of Ethiopia along the Red Sea coastline. Eritrea has an ancient history dating back to Biblical times and like that entire area has seen all of the turmoil common to the rest of the Middle East. But an interesting fact about Eritrea that was of the first places in the world to adopt Christianity, going back to the period of the Axiumite Kingdom in the 4th century AD just around the time of the Council of Nicaea

According to both the CIA and Pew Research, Eritrea is anywhere between 33% to 48% Muslim. Christians are a majority, representing 50% to 65% of the population, with 2% or less practicing another religions, usually in the form of local paganism.

According to the government and as noted by the article, there are five recognized religious sects in society. They are the Orthodox Church, the Catholic Church, the Lutheran Church, and Sunni Islam. Then the Wikipedia article about Eritrea’s stance on religions in society makes an interesting observation:
All other faiths and denominations are required to undergo a registration process. Among other things, the government’s registration system requires religious groups to submit personal information on their membership to be allowed to worship.
The Eritrean government is against reformed or radical versions of its established religions. Therefore, radical forms of Islam and Christianity, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Bahá’í Faith (though the Bahá’í Faith is neither Islamic nor Christian), the Seventh-day Adventist Church, and numerous other non-Protestant Evangelical denominations are not registered and cannot worship freely. (source)
What a curious yet strangely similar statement. It should not be strange, since this is the exact position which the Russian government has on religious groups which want to enter into society. Interestingly, as I pointed out yesterday, the only desire that the US Government has for “promoting religious freedom,” like with “democracy” and other ideas, when it suits particular persons in the financial and industrial classes who control the nation. A little bit of research quickly yields an interesting article from both Eritrean news as well as the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Eritrea Osman Saleh will be in Russia on a working visit at the invitation of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
On January 30, the two ministers will meet to discuss the key issues on the international and regional agendas with a focus on preventing and defusing conflicts in Africa, specifically in the Horn of Africa and South Sudan, as well as in the Middle East, including Syria and Yemen.
Sergey Lavrov and Osman Saleh are expected to focus on matters related to stepping up trade and economic cooperation between Russia and Eritrea, including joint mineral extraction projects in Eritrea, and creating a favourable investment climate for Russian enterprises.
Russia and Eritrea are interested in further promoting a political dialogue. The two countries share close or convergent approaches to the objective of building a multipolar world as a way to make the system of international relations more just and safe. Russia and Eritrea cooperate within the UN and other international organizations.
Training Eritrean nationals in Russian educational institutions is an important aspect of bilateral relations.
During his visit, Osman Saleh is expected to meet with the heads of the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the Agriculture Ministry, as well as representatives of the Russian business community.
Russia expects the upcoming visit by the Eritrean Foreign Minister to provide the impetus needed for facilitating joint efforts by Moscow and Asmara to put the potential in bilateral relations to effective use. (source, source)
Eritrea is also of interest because many “refugees” who have been brought to Europe as part of the false “migration crisis” from Africa also come from Eritrea:
Business is booming. Vanquish any given criminal group and who knows how many remain active, ready to exploit the army of the desperate. There are between 500,000 and one million people ready to leave from the Libyan coast to Sicily. In 2013, almost 40,000 immigrants landed in Italy for a total of 450 landings, mainly from war-torn countries such as Syria (10,851), followed by Eritrea (9,213), Somalia (3,254), Egypt (2,618) and Nigeria (2,458). In 2014 the numbers have soared: in the course of “Mare Nostrum” operations 207,000 were rescued. (source)
It is also of interest to note that due to its proximity to the Gulf Oil States, Eritrea also has heavy investments in it from Petrodollars, in particular from the European Union and Germany:
After months of talks, the European commission last week announced a new five-year assistance package to Eritrea worth €200m (£145m).
Officially, those funds are to support development in the energy sector and improve governance. In fact, it looks like another move to stem the flow of Eritrean asylum seekers to Europe while letting European companies exploit the country’s natural resources.
The grant from the EU development fund, the first from Brussels to Amara since 2009, has the full agreement of the EU’s 28 member states.
In the view of Neven Mimica, the EU commissioner for international cooperation and development, the package will help to tackle the root causes of migration from Eritrea.
However, preventing asylum seekers from fleeing is not the only potential benefit to the EU arising from the agreement. According to the statement, the €200m fund will be used in part for the energy sector, allowing more space for private investors.
New research shows that Eritrea’s Red Sea coast has “massive oil and gas reserves”, but the endless conflict with Ethiopia and the isolation of the Afwerki government have left the country’s natural resources largely untouched. (source)
This article above was written in 2015, before the current “refugee crisis” began, and in contrary to what it states, the “crisis” has only deepened. The sources only confirm that migration as increased, and in particular from Eritrea. As we have noted about this and the entire “crisis” as a whole, agreement was never about solving any “crisis” or helping anybody in terms of objective good. It always was, is, and will be about geopolitical objectives, and in this case it is about making economic preparations for a war.

The map below will help put things in perspective a little:


This is a map of oil and gas pipelines to Europe. Notice how most of those pipelines curiously flow through Russia, with Turkey taking second place. This is just a visual depiction of the obvious fact that most of Europe’s oil and gas comes through Russia. 

Right now Germany is currently planning for a war against Russia as part of its desire to re-assert its former imperial past, as we have constantly written about here at Shoebat.com. In the case of any war between Russia and Germany, Russia will immediately turn off all pipelines going to Europe, thus economically cutting the continent off from fuel supplies.

This is not something new. It was the reason why the National Socialists through their Axis allies brought Eritrea into their sphere of influence in World War II

Given all that we have been discussing about how Germany is planning for a Third World War and how the patterns and alliances of old are re-forming again today, is it really a surprise to see Eritrea, whose geopolitical location is a staging ground for playing out conflict between Germany (and today now the USA) and Russia, not to mention its importance in supplying massive amounts of energy resources, as in enough to drive an empire preparing for war?

If you do not recall, several months ago there was a story that went all around the Western media about GAY DEATH CAMPS IN RUSSIAN CONTROLLED CHECHNYA, with the emphasis being in all capital letters because the story was constantly paraded in the media even though there was not a dearth of evidence for such accusations. In an age of smartphones, pictures, and video at the click of a button, does it not seem strange that there is such a lack of media evidence about these camps? 

It should be a cause for concern, since it suggests there is far more here than what meets the eye, meaning that it is likely they do not exist. But if one takes the point of view of a propagandist looking to incite anti-Russian sentiment, what is more important - the existence of actual, truthful accuracy, or a story that whether it is true or not generates the desired end? It is an evil and dishonest way of looking at the world, but as it was once said, “in a war the first casualty is truth.”

Just like with the story above with these “Eritrean Christians,” the stories that were told in Russia had nothing to do at all with actual “gay death camps” just as much as this story most likely has little to do if there were a hundred people locked in shipping containers or not, if anybody was even locked in any shipping containers at all. The point was about the creation of an image before the public that will be continually prepared over time and later will be used to justify a pre-chosen response. In the case of the “gay death camps,” it is about justifying an attack on Russia in the name of “human rights” just as the questionable persecution of Christians that I wrote about yesterday in Russia is being used to try and justify portraying Russia as “persecutor of religious freedom” when such is not true at all.  

In the case of Eritrea, this is about justifying military intervention in order to strike at Russian interests as part of the greater geopolitical chess game that is taking place around us.

So back to the original article which, make no mistake, the persecution of Christians in many countries is real and terrible, and it must be pointed out when it happens.

But do not make the common mistake of simply accepting every story of persecution that comes out in the news as true or noteworthy for, as we have been striving to emphasize, many times these stories are simply vehicles to drive support for greater geopolitical goals by men who care nothing about Christians, Muslims, or anybody else, but solely the pursuit of power at all costs. 

http://shoebat.com/2017/06/06/one-hundred-christians-are-locked-in-shipping-container-and-forced-to-bake-in-the-hot-sun/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+shoebat+%28Walid+Shoebat%29


 

HAARP - ASSASSINATION WEAPON:


ASSASSINATION WEAPON:  HAARP WEAPON
NSA WHISTLEBLOWER SNOWDEN EXPLAINS


HAARP 
Weather Manipulation
Weapons   Mind Control   Nano Technology


HAARP
Scalar Waves / NWO   Controlling Your
Moods, Emotions, Mind Control
FIGHT!

 






St. Louis Paper: “Stand Your Ground” Laws Legalize Murder



 

St. Louis Paper: “Stand Your Ground” Laws Legalize Murder

Posted On 05 Jun 2017
 
The editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch is deeply concerned that Florida’s new, tougher “stand your ground” laws will open the door for similar legislation in states like Missouri. And to get a jump on the dreadful possibility that Show-Me-Staters will soon be able to lawfully defend themselves and their homes from the many, many violent thugs who populate the St. Louis area, they wrote an editorial saying that Gov. Rick Scott’s signature will give Floridians a “license to kill.”
“Critics say a reduced fear of prosecution could prompt an increase in homicides,” they write, using the weaseliest of weasel words. “Prosecuting attorneys would have to present ‘clear and convincing’ evidence that the use of force was not justified. Assailants would no longer have to prove their claim of self-defense because the bill presumes the claim is legitimate. Talk about an impossible burden.”
Um, would that not be the very presumption of innocence that forms the groundwork for our entire legal system? Yes, let’s do away with that. Let’s put the burden of proof on the accused. That’s how they do it in Iran, after all.
“The laws simply expect defense attorneys to prove that a defendant who pleads self-defense was protecting himself or his property and wasn’t motivated by anger or other emotions,” they write, seemingly horrified by the idea.
 
Sorry, but are we missing something? Isn’t that the essential law of the land in all homicide cases? Isn’t that why we put people on trial, even when the defendant admits to having killed the victim? Not all killings are the same. Is the Post-Dispatch editorial board suggesting that a person who kills to protect their life and homestead should be put away for life? What kind of world do we live in when presumptively-intelligent newspaper editors can believe that criminals should be able to invade any home they want without the slightest fear of being shot?
The left loves to accuse conservatives and Second Amendment supporters of being conspiracy-theorists who see black helicopters around every bend, but damn, they sure do make it easy to believe the worst. Who are you sticking up for here? Thugs. Junkies. Robbers. Burglars. The worst of the worst in our society. Why? Do you really think these scumbags are reading your intellectual editorial and driving up your subscription rates? Or are you so eaten up with the guilt of your own modest success that you feel obliged to stand up for the “less fortunate,” even it means endorsing tragedy?

Maybe the editors of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch would rather be murdered in their homes than actually stand up and protect themselves, and that’s fine. But how about you let those who DO actually care about security – who actually ENJOY their success and value their lives – protect themselves in the manner of their choosing?

THIS REPRESENTS THE UNITED STATES IN ITS PRESENT FORM....



 
THIS REPRESENTS
 
THE UNITED STATES
IN ITS PRESENT FORM.....
 
 
2 STORY OUTHOUSE
 
THE CITIZENS ARE ON THE LOWER FLOOR AND OUR GOVERNMENT IS ON THE 2ND FLOOR!!!
 
WHEN ARE WE GOING TO GET THE AHO'S GONE?? KAPISH??
 
TELL THE MILITARY TO STOP THE CHEMTRAILS AND HAARP
TELL THEM NO EXCUSES.....




Related image
 
THIS IS WHAT WE GET FROM THIS SO CALLED CABAL GOVERNMENT....
 
Image result for pile of poop

Jim Stone 6-7-2017


Explaining the following report:

Former U.S. intelligence contractor Dennis Montgomery has uncovered a plot by the Obama administration and failed Clinton administration to round up and kill 20 million Americans. This is verified across many sources. This story blew up when Sean Hannity had two investigators on that confirmed it. Now, because James Comey was fully aware of this, Dennis Montgomery filed a lawsuit against James Comey for knowing and participating in the intelligence gathering effort which involved gathering all data on the main core of Americans who are the last resistance holding the country together. I did a detailed report on them doing this and posted it in 2013. That report is now fully confirmed 100 percent accurate, and is re-posted below. And my being dead accurate on this type of topic years before it is "proven" is precisely why my readers have kept this site alive. Thank you.

You can read all you want on this by using the search terms "americans unmasked 20 million" without the brackets. This exploding open and is no hoax, it is going nuclear right now.

I am going to say it: There are very few (if any) others in alt media that can do a report that so perfectly matches what is eventually revealed as 100 percent true, complete with even accurate details, so many years later. There is a cold hard reason why this site gets hit so hard by people who want it wiped out. Make sure you read the report that is posted below, titled The Main Core. It has been reposted with zero edits, and has been permalinked in the right hand column for FOUR YEARS.


BLOCKBUSTER: HANNITY CONFIRMED THE MAIN CORE IS REAL TONIGHT

Years ago, I did a detailed report about what was called "The Main Core". The main core is the key group of people who make America what it is, who are all tracked and slated for killing or internment when Hillary's (or whoever elses) hammer drops. These are the people the FEMA camps are for.

Tonight, Sean Hannity had two investigators on who revealed that 47 hard drives were stolen from the FBI, and on those hard drives were 600 million documents on Americans who had been "unmasked" revealing all details of their lives so they could be rounded up and put in internment camps and/or killed. Hillary and Obama spearheaded the effort. If Hillary had scammed her way in, we'd be toast, Trump saved our lives. Now there is going to be a lawsuit on behalf of the 20 million (plus) people who had been unmasked, Comey is going down, the NSA might get it's ass kicked and Hillary and Obama had better worry. NOW FOR A REPOST of what I said about this years ago! Call this site FOUR YEARS AHEAD!

The Main Core

Jim Stone, July 7 2013 What the NSA hacking on America really means
When I worked for the NSA prior to 9/11, the NSA only looked outward, not inward. And I never thought the NSA ever would look inward and spy on the American people. I knew that if that ever happened the result would be catastrophic. After 9/11 I knew the NSA was looking inward to some degree, and had suspected they might be recording everything before Snowden blew the whistle, but I was not certain. Now we all can be. And I would like to go into a few things here to explain to people how grave this situation really is.
When an agency like the NSA looks outward into other countries, it cannot be a tool that is used by the governments of the countries being spied on to oppress the people in that country. When used to spy on foreigners the NSA and other similar agencies are not part of the policy making for that which they are observing. So the purpose for any spying by agencies such as the NSA will be limited to key elements of the observed nation, such as the government agencies and major companies that could present a problem to the whole of America in the future. The NSA will not pay attention to Joe the bar-b-q chef or Moe the mechanic, because on an individual level ordinary people in foreign countries are a waste of time to observe.

It is very different when such an intelligence agency looks inward at it's host population

With the NSA looking inward, especially with them recording every phone conversation and e-mail and not just the meta data, the people who understand what America really is supposed to be are now fully identified. These people, which are referred to as "the main core" represent what remains of the backbone of this once great nation, the core of which numbers 8 million with 30 or so million close enough to the main core for any psychopath to be able to justify taking out along with it. If America is to become the totally transformed Communist society that the Zionists want it to be, the main core has got to be ripped out, and the NSA has made this future event possible to accomplish with minimal effort and pin point precision. There is no question that the elitist zionist faction wants every aspect of America it cannot control with ease wiped out, just like the elitist Zionists Bolsheviks did to the Ukranian people. And as America approaches this same reality, we have the same approximate numbers, 30 - 70 million slated for death and internment in America. With the DHS ordering well over a billion rounds of ammo, countless tens of thousands of cheap plastic coffins already purchased and sitting in storage yards, 2, 700 giant heavily armed vehicles which are totally impenetrable to civilian weapons, vehicles perfectly capable of gutting American homes with high caliber gunfire right from the curb side, it is time for Americans to face a simple fact - All of the stories are more than just rumor. And because these stories are not just rumor, I would take the NSA spying on everyone VERY seriously.

It's too late

If you think Americans can change this situation with a 300 million eyed monster observing everyone's every move, you are off in fantasy land somewhere. It is GAME OVER. You cannot beat this monster with a cute little encryption trick performed on a compromised operating system with a compromised processor tapped into via a compromised internet. I see all of the new stupid pet trick type encryption fantasies some people are parading on the web now to "secure" themselves against the NSA as some sort of useless bubble gum fad, IF YOU WORKED FOR THEM AND UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON, YOU WOULD REALIZE SUCH EFFORTS ARE AS LAUGHABLE AS TRYING TO FIX A SEMI WITH A PLASTIC BARBIE TOOL SET. And if you are even able to HAVE that barbie tool set and try to use it, you are already flagged for elimination anyway. You should be focusing your efforts on other subjects like GETTING THE HELL OUT. And they know who you are. They know you know. They know if you have guns. They know you are not pleased with Obama, Bush, and false flag terror. They know you probably know the truth about the "holocaust", the truth about vaccines, GMO, and any other number of your particular pet topics that make them itch. They know where you are going to bug out to, and they know what you bought for it. If your car is 2005 or newer, they will watch you go to your bug out place and nail you there. Ditto if you are stupid enough to bring your cell, or bring anyone elses for that matter.
Your only option is to get to Iceland, Venezuela, Ecuador or any other country that proved itself with Snowden before the axe falls. Unlike the illegal immigrant "problem" America has, a large scale influx of Americans into nations such as Ecuador would intellectually launch any country that accepted them 30 years into the future because it won't be the idiots fleeing America, it will be the cream of the crop - those smart enough to see the asteroid coming. And if for any of the 500 reasons America now revokes passports from complete non criminals you are one of the 50 million that does not have one, GO INTO THE FOREIGN EMBASSIES AND START REQUESTING ASYLUM NOW.

When the axe falls

When the axe falls, you WON'T be running to Mexico because the border fence was for YOU, and unlike the B.S. you were told, it is totally impassable if you can even get to it. The border is so well surveilled now that you can't even get close to that fence which is impossible to get across even if you do. I know this because I spent four days in the back country border zone observing what is going on. Believe me, the security is real, and it is for stopping Americans, NOT Mexicans. And if you think Canada will save you, WAKE UP. When the axe falls, the Zionist Bolsheviks who run the U.S. government will be on the diplomatic channels to all nations saying it is fair and balanced and everyone will get a fair trial, so anyone who is complaining here and asking for asylum is some sort of lunatic. They will have PR campaigns of epic proportions coming out of Hollywood and paid for advertisements in all prospective refuge nations, calling you a criminal or a nut case or a deadbeat to hinder your asylum bid. They will have the CIA working overtime, and the zionist factions within the not totally infiltrated prospective asylum nations working overtime in secret to flip public opinion against you. If you were part of America's main core, they have ONE objective for you - to burn you to ashes or bury you in a pit somewhere, and that objective does not involve allowing you to escape to bring the seeds of America out of the country to sprout a whole new "problem" for them elsewhere.

I got banned at a not so "godlike" forum for posting the following:

What I posted was not quite as detailed, but it said the same thing. It was an instaban, which means someone read it as I typed it - they have an agenda of hate to push, obviously. Anyway, This sign appeared in Indiana, and Muslims are very upset:
The billboard is mostly wrong. Here is my debunking of the billboard that tripped the ban:
1. Aisha was Mohammed's youngest wife. She was 14 or 15 when it became formalized, and they actually "did it" for the first time when she was 19. 14 is early to commit nowadays but back then they started early and died early.
2. The rape allegation is statutory, and based on a lie about the age they were when relations started. However, at that time it was normal to start everything at age 14 because times changed. Life was shorter. Applying statutory law from a different system a thousand plus years later, and on top of that, to a myth, is completely bogus.
3. The battle that supposedly according to the account of ONE historian who lived 150 years afterward with no other accounts whatsoever had 600 Jews beheaded is deeply refuted. See this and it is downright brazen to claim that in such a prominent and public way when historians can't decide on whether or not it is true. And even if it was true, war is war. America has killed many times as many people with a single bomb before.
4. Mohammed did not ever have 11 wives at one time, and the majority were economic marriages to widows who needed help to survive after their husbands died. That's just the way it was back then, and why polygamy existed. Mohammed married his first wife at the age of 25, when she was 40. Most likely only two wives were ones Mohammed actually married out of love, and the others were for charity and politics. It was certaintly not the scenario that became urban legend, see this
5. Slave owner and dealer? Who knows, but the definition of slavery has changed. Back then, a slave could be a prisoner of war, and had to be released after 7 years with enough money to start a life. It was not like "Kunta Kinte". So whatever with that.
6. Tortured and killed unbelievers? That may have happened, because there were wars back then and Islam was a new religion. The wars are a reality that can't be debunked.
So perhaps the sign gets a score of 2 out of six questions, or right around 33 percent, which is a flat F anywhere, by any standard. And the context is out of whack with all of it except the wars.
And that's worth a ban because there is one tribe that desperately clings to the benefit of victim status at all cost.

Londoners chant "WE LOVE TRUMP

I was wondering why the Brits would hate Trump, because that is all you can read anywhere. But the truth slips out, and this video has it. You can hear, from somewhere in the background, a group of people chanting "we love Trump" in London. Pretty much says it all. SEE THIS Anonymous sent:
The Russian hacking report (fake) was created specifically to trap leakers......and it worked like a charm. Jim, York PA"
My comment: That would make sense, I never thought anything would come of this. Perfect trap, if so.
Anonymous sent:
If you were actually a climate scientist and wanted life to fluorish on this planet, you would want about 1200 ppm CO2 and about 35% oxygen. All life on the planet is currently suffering from a severe lack of oxygen
My response: 1200 ppm Co2 is right on, but 35 percent oxygen would not be good, because at that high a level if a fire started everything would burn and it would never stop until everything was gone. wildfires are bad enough as it is.
For reference, atmospheric Co2 is right around 450 ppm right now. That's far below optimal.

Notre Dame Cathedral:

Apparently a guy attacked a police officer with a hammer and the police officer shot back. 2, 000 people are temporarily being held inside the cathedral.

Possible new "terror attack"

This time it is gunshots at Notre Dame cathedral in Paris. It looks to me like they are ramping up the psy ops for some reason, but I can hardly think it would be to justify another war. Something else is up with this and I have not figured out what, other than a clamp down on the public. How about this hypothesis: Europe had a law abiding populace. A reason was needed for a police state lock down on all of Europe. So they started shipping Muslims in, to take the blame for the loss of freedom. Then a bunch of terror attacks are staged, and the people accept the loss of all liberty and freedom. Hitler's Europe gets set up, but instead of Hitler, it is done by the JWO. Make any sense there? it is the only thing I can think of. This story is minutes old (5 minutes old at the time of this posting) so let's see how this evolves.

A few headlines that mean absolutely nothing today

Russia intercepted a B-52

So what? The intercept happened in international airspace. Nothing follows, and I mean nothing.

Mayor of London wants Trump state visit canceled.

So what? London is toast anyway. Muslim mayor calls to block Trump visit. A tree fell into rows 1-30 of Farmer Bob's back 40 corn field.

UK killer seen on TV unfurling ISIS flag

Really? You mean the MSM, which got busted setting up fake interviews with Muslim women afterward, would not plant that for political reasons? Just add that, in addition to the fake interviews, to the video of the actors getting dressed before the London Bridge attack and getting filmed later laying in the street as perpetrators and victims. Yep. That again. How boring. More interesting is his name: Kurham Butt. That does not mean anything good, even in Islam. Where do they get these names? off the floor of the CNN war room?

New York passengers trapped in dark hot subway train for an hour

HA HA HA, what kind of headline is that? Just try the Red Line in Boston when that is having problems. You'll do that every day. And what about the subway in Washington DC? If you are going more than five stops, chances are you'll have the same thing happen for at least 20 minutes at some point, and if you are going 15 stops, you will be trapped for an hour or more, CONSTANTLY. Gee, if that is news the New York subway must be GREAT.

Pets: the new probiotic

Yep, if you are a totally unhygenic slob that has not changed the litter box for a month and a half. And unlike what the article implies, not all of those "biotics" will be "pro!" Anyway, a lot the news has been boring lately. Much of it is reading like filler. Maybe a few will care about the mayor of London wanting Trump banished, but all I see in that is what everyone already knows: London is TOAST.

Nothing will come of NSA leak to the Intercept

The name is painful to publish, because it is so hard to believe - "Reality Leigh Winner". Anyway, if she is real, she supposedly leaked NSA documents of Russian hacking to The Intercept. Nothing will come of it. It appears "Reality" has no grip on reality. She did not know what she had, or what it meant. All she had was proof that Russia tried to hack one company that works in election related software. The reason why this is no big deal is because Russian hackers go after everything, and simply by the numbers, one election related company ended up getting hack attempts. Russians also try to hack Dunkin Donuts. So what.
There is nothing in this. No proof of any influence on the election whatsoever. And this stupid girl took the hit for her stupidity, she simply saw something she figured was good, could not make heads or tails of it, and sent it off. I'll give an example of what a nothing burger this is:
When I was 9 years old, I and a friend found hundreds of canceled checks laying in a ditch, and not knowing how anything at all worked figured we'd found a huge pile of cash. Obviously we did not. And that is how stupid miss "Reality" was with this NSA document - she just saw the words "Russia, hack, and election" and figured she had it. Not hardly!
The only thing that might come out of this is more false allegations from a scamming MSM, which will drive that MSM further into the black hole it is already getting eaten by. And oh, there will now be a new "Reality" in jail, because the FBI busted her over the week end. What an idiot.
routing test

Brain death reversal?

This would be a game changer if it worked.

An American company called Bioquark wants to do experimental trials of injecting brain stem cells into people who have been declared brain dead, in the hopes of re-booting their brains. They are confident it will work. They tried to do it in India and got rejected, and will now try to do it in Latin America. My take on this is why not try it, if all they are going to do is pull the plug anyway? It will be interesting to see if the same people come back, or if they get a different spirit (if this works) because I believe that if it is your time to go, you're gone. And then something else can take your place if the body becomes viable again . . . . . . anyway, it will be interesting to see how this goes. See thisand Here is the closest thing to an abstract It is not exactly an abstract, it is more of an appeal for people to experiment on but it is, at least, for real.

Controversy - ban muslim illegal importation or no?


TRUMP'S EXCLUSION OF ALIENS FROM SPECIFIC  COUNTRIES IS LEGAL

Andrew C. McCarthy
January 28, 2017 5:30 PM 
Arguments to the contrary ignore the Constitution and misstate federal law.  
On Friday, President Donald Trump issued an executive order calling for heightened vetting of certain foreign nationals seeking entry into the United States. The order temporarily suspends entry by the nationals of seven Muslim-majority countries: Syria, Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. It is to last for 90 days, while heightened vetting procedures are developed. 
The order has predictably prompted intense protest from critics of immigration restrictions (most of whom are also critics of Trump). At the New York Times, the Cato Institute’s David J. Bier claims the temporary suspension is illegal because, in his view, it flouts the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This contention is meritless, both constitutionally and as a matter of statutory law. 
Let’s start with the Constitution which vests all executive power in the president. Under the Constitution, as Thomas Jefferson wrote shortly after its adoption, “the transaction of business with foreign nations is Executive altogether. It belongs then to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specifically submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.” 
The rare exceptions Jefferson had in mind, obviously, were such matters as the approval of treaties, which Article II expressly vests in the Senate. There are also other textual bases for a congressional role in foreign affairs, such as Congress’s power over international commerce, to declare war, and to establish the qualifications for the naturalization of citizens. That said, when Congress legislates in this realm, it must do so mindful of what the Supreme Court, in United States v. Curtiss-Wright (1936), famously described as “the very delicate, plenary and exclusive power of the President as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations – a power which does not require as a basis for its exercise an act of Congress.”
In the international arena, then, if there is arguable conflict between a presidential policy and a congressional statute, the president’s policy will take precedence in the absence of some clear constitutional commitment of the subject matter to legislative resolution. And quite apart from the president’s presumptive supremacy in foreign affairs, we must also adhere to a settled doctrine of constitutional law: Where it is possible, congressional statutes should be construed in a manner that avoids constitutional conflicts. 
With that as background, let’s consider the claimed conflict between the president’s executive order and Congress’s statute. Mr. Bier asserts that Trump may not suspend the issuance of visas to nationals of specific countries because the 1965 immigration act “banned all discrimination against immigrants on the basis of national origin.” And, indeed, a section of that act, now codified in Section 1152(a) of Title 8, U.S. Code, states that (with exceptions not here relevant) “no person shall receive any preference or priority or be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence” (emphasis added). 
Even on its face, this provision is not as clearly in conflict with Trump’s executive order as Bier suggests. As he correctly points out, the purpose of the anti-discrimination provision (signed by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965) was to end the racially and ethnically discriminatory “national origins” immigration practice that was skewed in favor of Western Europe. Trump’s executive order, to the contrary, is in no way an effort to affect the racial or ethnic composition of the nation or its incoming immigrants. The directive is an effort to protect national security from a terrorist threat, which, as we shall see, Congress itself has found to have roots in specified Muslim-majority countries. 
Because of the national-security distinction between Trump’s 2017 order and Congress’s 1965 objective, it is not necessary to construe them as contradictory, and principles of constitutional interpretation counsel against doing so. 
Nevertheless, let’s concede for argument’s sake that there is conflict. At issue is a matter related to the conduct of foreign affairs – a matter of the highest order of importance since it involves foreign threats to national security. If there were a conflict here, the president’s clear constitutional authority to protect the United States would take precedence over Congress’s dubious authority to limit the president’s denial of entry to foreign nationals. 
But there is no conflict. 
Federal immigration law also includes Section 1182(f), which states: “Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate” (emphasis added).
Section 1182(f) plainly and sweepingly authorizes the president to issue temporary bans on the entry of classes of aliens for national-security purposes. This is precisely what President Trump has done. In fact, in doing so, he expressly cites Section 1182(f), and his executive order tracks the language of the statute (finding the entry of aliens from these countries at this time “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States”). 
While Bier ignores the president’s constitutional foreign-affairs authority (although Trump expressly relies on it in the first line of his executive order), he concedes that Trump is relying on a statute. He theorizes, nevertheless, that because Section 1182(f) was enacted in 1952, whereas the non-discrimination provision (Section 1152(a)) was enacted years afterward, the latter must be deemed to have amended the former – thus removing the president’s authority to impose class restrictions based on the aliens’ country of origin. 
Nice try.
Put aside that Trump is principally relying on his inherent constitutional authority, and that the class restriction he has directed is based on national-security, not racial or ethnic considerations. Trump’s executive order also expressly relies on an Obama-era provision of the immigration law, Section 1187(a)(12), which governs the Visa Waiver Program. This statute empowers the executive branch to waive the documentation requirements for certain aliens. In it, Congress itself expressly discriminates based on country of origin.

Under this provision, Congress provides that an alien is eligible for the waiver only if he or she has not been present (a) in Iraq or Syria any time after March 1, 2011; (b) in any country whose government is designated by the State Department as “repeatedly provid[ing] support for acts of international terrorism”; or (c) in any country that has been designated by the Department of Homeland Security as a country “of concern.” 
Trump is principally relying on his inherent constitutional authority. 
So, not only has Congress never repealed the president’s sweeping statutory power to exclude classes of aliens from entry on national-security grounds; decades after the 1965 anti-discrimination provision touted by Bier, Congress expressly authorized discrimination on the basis of national origin when concerns over international terrorism are involved. Consequently, by Bier’s own logic, the 1965 statute must be deemed amended by the much more recent statute. 
Bier concedes that, despite the 1965 anti-discrimination statute, President Jimmy Carter barred entry by Iranian nationals in 1980, after the Khomeini revolution led to the U.S.-hostage crisis. But he treats Carter’s restriction based on national origin as an aberration. Instead, he insists, we should place more stock in the federal courts’ affirmation of the 1965 anti-discrimination provision during the 1990s — specifically, in a litigation involving an alien from Vietnam who had fled to Hong Kong and objected to being required to return to Vietnam to apply for a visa when applicants from other countries faced no such requirement. 
But there is no inconsistency here. Bier perceives one only by overlooking the salient national-security distinction. The discriminatory treatment of Iranians was rationally rooted in anti-terrorism concerns, and was clearly proper. The discriminatory treatment of the Vietnamese alien was unrelated to national security or terrorism, and thus problematic. Trump, like Carter, is quite properly acting on national-security concerns. 
One can debate the policy wisdom of the executive order, which is plainly a temporary measure while a more comprehensive and thoughtfully tailored policy is developed. The seven countries the president has singled out are surely hotbeds of radical Islam; but he has omitted other countries – e.g., Saudi Arabia, home to 15 of the 19 suicide-hijackers who attacked our country on 9/11 – that are also cauldrons of jihadism. 
Furthermore, as I have argued, the real threat to be targeted is sharia-supremacist ideology, which is inherently hostile to the Constitution. Were we to focus our vetting, unapologetically, on that ideology (also known as “radical” or “political” Islam), it would be unnecessary to implement a categorical ban on Muslims or immigrants from majority-Muslim countries. That is critical because non-Islamist Muslims who can demonstrate loyalty to our constitutional principles should not be barred from admission; while Islamists, on the other hand, are not found only in Muslim-majority countries – other things being equal, a sharia supremacist from the banlieues of Paris poses as much of a threat as a sharia supremacist from Raqqa. 
Yet, all that can be debated as we go forward. For now, there is no doubt that the executive order temporarily banning entry from specified Muslim-majority countries is both well within President Trump’s constitutional authority and consistent with statutory law. 
— Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior policy fellow at the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National Review
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444371/donald-trump-muslim-alien-ban-legal 

'refugee' boys who sexually assaulted 5 year old Idaho girl






It’s as if it never happened.

*A judge sentenced three Muslim 'refugee' boys in the sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl in Idaho, but nobody knows the length or terms of the sentence because the judge has barred everyone in the courtroom, including the victim’s own parents, from speaking about the case.

The three boys — two from Iraq ages 7 and 10, and one from Sudan aged 14 — pleaded guilty in juvenile court in April to multiple counts of sex crimes in an incident that occurred last June in Twin Falls. The assault occurred at Fawnbrook Apartments when 5-year-old Jayla, who is developmentally disabled, was lured into a laundry room, stripped of her clothing and sexually assaulted while the oldest boy filmed the entire incident.

Now, following a sentencing hearing Monday at the Snake River Juvenile Detention Center in Twin Falls, Judge Thomas Borreson of Idaho’s 5th Judicial District issued a gag order preventing everyone in the courtroom from saying anything about the sentence received by the boys.

Lacy Peterson and her little girl, who was the victim of a sexual assault last June, by boys from Iraq and Sudan, at the Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls.
Lacy Peterson and her little girl, who was the victim of a sexual assault last June, by boys from Iraq and Sudan, at the Fawnbrook Apartments in Twin Falls. 
Borreson did allow the family to say they were unhappy with the sentencing, but threatened to jail them for contempt of court if they say why they are unhappy.

“We can’t talk about it since it’s a sealed case,” said Lacy Peterson, the girl’s mother when contacted by WND Tuesday.

The family’s attorney also told WND he was bound by the judge’s gag order.  Mark Guerry sent the following text message to WND:
“Sorry but I am forbidden by court order from discussing anything that has gone on in the proceedings, especially the outcome of the sentencing. This is a juvenile case, which by its nature makes it a closed proceeding, and the judge has made it clear again that anyone who discusses it with the media, etc., will be held in contempt. Sorry but my hands are tied. All I can do is tell you the parents were not satisfied with the results of this case. They were especially upset with the prosecutor’s repeated statements in the media defending the juvenile defendants, rather than focusing on the victim. I can’t say anymore.”
Mathew Staver, chairman and co-founder of the nonprofit legal assistance agency Liberty Counsel, told WND that Judge Borreson was completely out of line in issuing a gag order after the fact in a criminal case.

Mathew Staver of Liberty Counsel
Mathew Staver of Liberty Counsel

“It’s unconstitutional for the judge to do that. There are gag orders that can be put on people during a jury trial, or if it’s a minor they can prohibit you from mentioning the name of the minor, but they can’t gag you after the fact,” Staver said. “This is public at this point. This judge, it just seems like he’s forgotten about the First Amendment in this case. He has no authority to do this. He can’t hold someone in contempt to keep them from speaking out about their displeasure with the case after the fact.”

Staver said case law is clear on the subject of gag orders.  “That’s a shame what happened to their little girl. This judge can’t gag them. They can voice their displeasure all they want to.  This judge can’t do a thing to stop them,” he said. “Case law is clear. You cannot gag someone after the case is over. Anyone can comment on it, especially the victims. It’s my understanding what they wanted to do was criticize the outcome and they have that right.”

Staver said he feels so strongly about the issue of free speech that he would be willing to take the family’s case and challenge the judge’s order.

Liberty Counsel is an international nonprofit, litigation, education, and policy organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and the family since 1989.

This isn’t the first time an official in Idaho has tried to squelch free speech in relation to the Twin Falls sexual assault case.

U.S. Attorney for Idaho Wendy J. Olson, was appointed by President Obama in 2010.
Former U.S. Attorney for Idaho Wendy J. Olson, was appointed by President Obama in 2010 and threatened to prosecute Idaho residents who spoke out about the sexual assault case in a way that was unflattering to the perpetrators.

After the case came to light last summer, the former Obama-appointed U.S. attorney for Idaho, Wendy Olson, threatened to prosecute anyone who promulgated “false or inflammatory information” about the crime or the perpetrators. She was later forced to walk back the comments after being criticized by constitutional experts.

In a op-ed for WND, anti-Shariah activist Pamela Geller called the judge’s decision “a Travesty of Justice as Idaho Muslim Migrant Rapists Go Unpunished.  The travesty of justice in Idaho is now complete…instead of getting justice, the victim’s family has been abused by law enforcement and governing authorities as if they were the criminals – because what happened to their little girl contradicts the politically correct narrative about Muslim migrants,” Geller wrote. “On Monday, the perpetrators were sentenced, and the final injustice was done to this poor girl.”

Geller said there were 12 to 15 people in the courtroom for the sentencing hearing and one of them leaked the outcome to her anonymously.  “And the more I heard, the more I understood why this judge wanted to keep all the proceedings secret,” she said.

Janice Kroeger, the senior deputy prosecuting attorney, who was supposed to be trying these boys for their crimes, defended the boys and repeatedly attacked Lacy, the victim’s mother. A therapist for the boys was present, as well as a parole officer and a detective. Everything that was said was designed to portray the perpetrators as victims. Throughout the proceedings, they were repeatedly called victims.”

The court heard about how the attackers are doing well in school, and about how smart they are, according to Geller.  “They were praised for the supposed ordeal they had to go through. It was claimed that all three are suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder from having to go through courtroom proceedings.  After this love fest, which lasted for five hours in the courtroom, all three boys were sentenced, one after the other,” she continued. “All three were given probation. They were not found guilty of rape, but of sexually lewd conduct.”

Geller said every time the family’s lawyer, Guerry, tried to speak up, he was silenced.

The 5-year-old victim, Jayla, was never mentioned by Kroeger or the judge – or by the police.

Lacy, in her statement to the court, described how Jayla is still struggling with the trauma of the attack – wetting the bed and having bad dreams, among other issues. "Yet when Lacy completed her statement, Kroeger lashed out not at the perpetrators or their parents, but at Lacy,” Geller writes. “She viciously tongue-lashed Lacy for a full 15 minutes, until finally Judge Borreson had to stop her.”

When the refugee boys pleaded guilty in April, Twin Falls County Prosecutor Grant Loebs said: “I am pleased that we were able to resolve this case in a way that was approved and agreed to by the victim’s family. This continues to be a serious and sad case, but it was resolved properly.”

Geller says nothing could be farther from the truth.  “The resolution of the case was not accepted by the victim’s family, and it was not resolved properly.”

She said Idaho officials were willing to sacrifice the well being of a small girl in an effort to suppress negative information about the state’s growing 'refugee'  community.

“If there were any justice, Judge Borreson would be impeached and removed now,” Geller writes.

Meanwhile, the family is struggling to meet its expenses after having to leave the low-income apartment complex where they lived until their daughter was attacked. They were forced to live in a hotel for two months until they could find suitable living arrangements. They also have counseling expenses for their daughter and legal fees. Their GoFundMe account has raised $75,881 to date.


Related column:
Travesty: Migrant attackers of 5-year-old unpunished by Pamela Geller

*****************************************************************8
 
*This 'judge' is just as QUILTY as the MUSLIM  phony 'refugee' boys due to his discrimination against a fellow American, a 5 year old female VICTIM of rape and abuse that this child will NEVER FORGET.  Rape is a CRIME in America, so when a person rapes an American of ANY age - WHY ARE MUSLIMS EXCLUDED FROM punishment and publicity like any other American would receive by a court?  In Islam females are to be used and abused, not respected, loved or protected.  Males learn this by Koran indoctrination and adult instruction. It is OK - even encouraged - to rape, abuse, torture, stone to death, burn to death, disfigure by acid, even behead and murder Americans, especially females of ANY age.  Decisions such as the judge handed down set a precedent for protection of muslims from their crimes and until and unless Americans rise up and DEMAND these demons be REMOVED from this nation, we can only EXPECT MORE RAPES AND EVEN WORSE - WHICH IS ALREADY TAKING PLACE IN THE US.  These illegal demons are here due to the United Nations edict - along with full cooperation of the former Obama administration, including all the Muslim Brotherhood 'czars' - positions which never existed prior to Obama's implementation, positions which are NOT lawful positions of our government.  The people of this nation are only as safe as what is being allowed, even perpetrated by those in 'authority' over the people - legal or illegal. Americans need to hold those in authority ACCOUNTABLE for their crimes committed against the people of the US - beginning with this situation.  There is already a LAW making entrance of muslims ILLEGAL in the US.  

http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/news-blackout-on-refugee-boys-who-sexually-assaulted-idaho-girl/

Climate Change. Uh-Huh.


By Anna Von Reitz

"Climate Change" is code for "Excuse to Tax".  Any excuse will do.  

Back in 1974, the same parties now running around yowling about "Global Warming" were yowling then about "Global Cooling".  They were as intellectually devoid of sense and honor then as they are now. 

The Earth we live on is a living, breathing organism.  It changes.  So do you. 

Whoopee!  Call the Governor!  Call the Press Corps!  

It is interesting to note that the same climate alarmists responsible for all this hype are the same ones who predicted that the Earth would be totally overcome by the "burden" of overpopulation.  We were all supposed to have died off by 1980.  

To quote Gomer Pyle, "Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!" 

No sign of anything these hoaxers have predicted happening to date.  

Which points up another fact of life.  These people always and I do mean ALWAYS start out by trying to scare you.  That is so they can apply their Hegelian Dialectic. ---fancy words to describe a con job process.  

First, they scare you silly over something that doesn't exist, or which exists only because they created the problem or which exists but nobody can do anything about anyway.    

(The singular personification of "the" Devil is an example of the first, ISIS is an example of the second, and "climate change" is an example of the third starting point choice.) 

Then they raise a bunch of outcry and howling and "educating" and draw a lot of attention to themselves and collect a lot of money under false pretenses either as a protection racket or for political action.  

Then they claim credit for themselves for having solved this terrible problem that they so heroically brought to public attention and thereby saved everyone. 

Right.  

Well, this happens to be the sequence that most actual, factual public problem resolutions follow --- the difference is the starting point.  

These people cynically choose a false start and create the whole hoop-la to profit themselves and for no other reason.  

Climate change has been going on for billions of years.  It will continue.  

They know this. 

On a world scale, it is just a repeat of the same scam David Rockefeller used to "corporatize" the United States.  

Find an excuse for racketeering, then give kickbacks to ensure that everyone gets on board. 


Been there. Done that.  Ready to LMAO if they think they are going to pull it again.

-----------------------------
See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

The Numbskulls of 'The View' - geeeeezzzzz


The Numbskulls of 'The View' Compare American Christians to Taliban



Before we get into the latest idiocy from the 'ladies' of ABC’s 'The View', let’s take a stroll through some of the worst atrocities visited upon the Afghani people by the Islamist fundamentalist government known as the Taliban. 

A comprehensive list of this wretched group’s horrors would require a book the size of an encyclopedia, but here’s a partial list:
  • Child torture
  • The murder of their own soldiers
  • Burning opposition families alive
  • The ethnic cleansing of Hazara men
  • The castration and torture of their political enemies
  • Countless massacres
And, perhaps more to the point in this instance, the passing of Islamist laws against women such as:
  • Strict limitations on what women may wear – no thin clothing, no decorative adornments, no perfume, and a whole-body veil.
  • Women may not walk down the center of a road.
  • Women may not leave their house without a man’s permission.
  • Women may not speak to strange men.
  • Women may not laugh in public or speak too loudly.
  • Women may not be photographed or filmed.
  • Women are not permitted to work outside the home.
And the list goes on.

It really reminds you of Donald Trump’s America, doesn’t it?

No? Well, you apparently haven’t heard about what Trump did last week. His administration announced that they were moving to scrap the Obamacare contraceptive mandate that forces businesses to offer their female employees health insurance that covers birth control.

GASP!

The women of 'The View' – who would be put to death by the Taliban within five seconds for breaking any number of Islamic crimes – decided that this move put us on the road to a Christian theocracy.
“You can’t hide behind religion to restrict other people’s rights!” host Jedediah Bila exclaimed.

“How is it any different from the Taliban is what I’d like to know?” said the eternally brainless Joy Behar.

You’d expect at this point that at least one of the women around the table would clear their throat and say something like, “Oh, Joy, how about no...” but it didn’t happen. 

Instead, Whoopi Goldberg hopped right on Behar’s crazy train. “I said this before,” Goldberg said. “I’m going to say it again. With all these rollbacks and all the things we hear, what’s the difference between us and the people we’re fighting?”

“Nothing,” confirmed Behar. (How about we give these idiots a FREE TRIP to one of the nations experiencing the customary muslim lifestyle so they can experience for themselves what the difference is between Islam and American freedom. We will arrange for the entire experience to be filmed, then they can use it as script for their next show.  Good idea?!)

“What’s the difference?” Goldberg asked again, drawing applause from her mindless audience members. (OMG - the dumbed down 'education system' in America really IS that bad.)
 
“That’s what I’m saying,” Behar said. “It’s to keep women down also. Let’s not forget they are trying to keep women in their place. Barefoot and pregnant.”

This isn’t about the specific stupidity of Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg, neither of whom really matter in the grand scheme of things. It’s about the surface-level, pig-ignorance of American feminism, an ideology that is driven by people who haven’t known one day of real hardship in their entire lives. 

To compare this situation – Damn, the federal government won’t FORCE my religious employer to pay for my birth control – to the FRIGGIN TALIBAN just shows you that for all the left’s talk about “privilege,” they really don’t have the first clue how good they’ve got it.

The above report clarifies exactly WHY I REFUSE TO WATCH THESE IDIOTS or support their program. I can't even figure out WHY these dumb *itches are still even on air and have sponsors for their foolishness!

(I recommend we ship them to Afghanistan or Kenya or Somalia or Qatar or Saudi Arabia so they can each personally 'experience' Islam for themselves. We will see then how loud they scream for HELP!!! And beg to come home.) 

http://www.restoreamericanglory.com/freedoms/the-numbskulls-of-the-view-compare-american-christians-to-taliban/