2016… The End of Social Security

2016… The End of Social Security (Leaked Evidence Stumps Obama, Stuns Retirees)

• by JL Yastine
• April 25, 2016

American seniors have been worried about our nation’s ability to continue to pay out Social Security.

As one retirement-bound Los Angeles resident puts it, “The money that I put aside now, it’s not like that money is going to be waiting for me.”

Unfortunately, several leaked reports now confirm that these fears will become an ugly reality, very soon.

Doug Bandow, a former special assistant to President Ronald Reagan, and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, warns that seniors must plan for “Social Security’s coming crash.”

And in an alarming article, U.S. News & World Report  argues that payouts will inevitably end, and says you must learn how to “prepare for the end of Social Security” now.

How could this happen?

As you know, Social Security operates as a classic Ponzi scheme — new contributions are used to pay off earlier contributors.

The problem is twofold: Our 'government' tapped into (stole from the forced extorted 'savings' of working Americans paychecks) Social Security savings, and there are not enough new contributors to pay those who already funded the system.   (AND those monies have been doled out to the illegals, 'immigrants' and 'refugees' while Americans continue to struggle by each month as the amounts of their social security monthly receipts have continued to be reduced instead of  raised to the amounts they should have been in the first place - at least $3,600 monthly or MORE. These funds were intermixed in the general fund and NOT in a separate trust  set aside for them for investment to assist seniors as the law provided, so these funds were NOT protected FOR Americans.  That fund has been played on platforms and has brought in godzillions to the criminals in Wash DC and NYC running this nation, more than enough to adequately support seniors, while starving out the seniors to provide their funds for the incoming illegals and muslims who continue to live for free off the backs of Americans.)

And the problem is worse than any 'government' agency wants to admit. (No kidding - why admit to being quilty of THEFT?)

However, one famous economist, James Dale Davidson, boldly states…

“We could see the end of Social Security as soon as 2016, and there is nothing President Obama, Congress or any other government agency can do to stop it.”

(Yet ANOTHER ''NO KIDDING"!  The 'plan' was to spend those funds and to NOT give them to the seniors.)

Yes, Social Security as we know it could end in 2016.
Before you dismiss Davidson’s warning, know that he has a remarkable track record of calling nearly every major economic shift over the last three decades.

For example, Davidson predicted the stock market collapse of 1999 and 2007, along with the fall of the Soviet Union and Japan’s economic downfall, to name just a few.

And his predictions have been so accurate, he’s been invited to shake hands and counsel the likes of former presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton — and he’s had the good fortune to befriend and convene with George Bush Sr., Steve Forbes, Donald Trump, Margaret Thatcher, Sir Roger Douglas and even Boris Yeltsin.

So, how can Davidson be so sure that Social Security will end in 2016?

As Davidson explains in a newly released video, “Right now, there are five massive cracks in the American economy’s foundation that are converging for the first time in history. This is a landmark development that I am convinced will trigger the greatest depression we’ve ever seen. Yes, worse than the 1929 Great Depression.”

Editor’s Note: Click Here to See the 5 Economic Cracks That Are Converging for the First Time in History.

Davidson’s new video is causing a controversy, not just because of what he says, but because the evidence he provides is irrefutable (he uses over 20 unquestionable charts to prove his point).

“I know that everywhere you turn things look pretty good,” Davidson goes on to say, “The market is near all-time highs, the dollar is strong and real estate is booming again. But remember, the exact same scenario played out in 1999 and 2007. The economy is unraveling right now, and fast. Very fast.”

Davidson warns that a 50% stock market collapse is looming, that “real estate will plummet by 40%, savings accounts will lose 30% and unemployment will triple.” 

(To see Davidson’s research behind these predictions, click here.)

And although our future may seem bleak, as Davidson says, “There is no need to fall victim to the future. If you are on the right side of what’s ahead, you can seize opportunities that come along once, maybe twice, in a lifetime.”

Indeed, in his video, Davidson reveals what he and his family are doing to prepare right now, and even profit. (It’s unconventional and even controversial, but proven to work.)  http://thesovereigninvestor.com/exclusives/2016-the-end-of-social-security/?z=486733

While Davidson intended his video for a private audience only, original viewers leaked it out and now tens of thousands are downloading the video every day.

http://thesovereigninvestor.com/exclusives/2016-the-end-of-social-security/?z=486733

4-29-16 Anna von Reitz - Common Law v. Admiralty Law, People v. Persons

 

4-29-16 Anna von Reitz - Common Law v. Admiralty Law, People v. Persons

Our Forefathers CHOSE the system of Common Law based on the Law of Moses (Ten Commandments) as the Law of the Land and they chose men to serve as judges from among themselves in every county, state, and region. 
. 
If we want to live under that system of law, we have to do the same thing. CHOOSE to live under Common Law, form a jural assembly for our communities as brilliantly summarized by the Michigan Jural Assembly which has already had their Common Law System in place for decades, elect judges to fill the vacant judicial offices, and live accordingly. 
. 
This is the way this country was set up and so far as I am concerned, the way it is still supposed to run. Those who don’t want to accept that are outlaws. Those who do are law abiding. Simple as that. 
. 
We are free to accept, amend, and reject laws within that system as every jury sees fit. That is why we have JURY NULLIFICATION built into this whole process. 
. 
ANY law passed by ANY legislative body in the Common Law System can be nullified by a body of twelve honest Americans sitting as a jury. Such a jury can rewrite a law they find unfair or impractical or they can utterly reject one they find unjust, vague, or unworkable. 
. 
Jury nullification is where the average people called to jury duty get to enforce their will on the entire system— in Common Law, that is. Also, in Common Law, the judge serves the people– he doesn’t tell them what to do. He doesn’t interpret the law. The jury does that. He listens to the arguments along with the jury, maintains fair rules of evidence and argument, asks questions, but at the end of the day, the JURY makes their own decision and the judge executes their sentence.

TRUMP'S MUSLIM BAN IS YUUGE!

FOR  1  KEY  GROUP  TRUMP'S  MUSLIM  BAN  IS YUUGE! 

 Idea  has  massive  Republican  support  as  primary  votes  are  cast  in  state  after  state

 

 

April 28 2016

When GOP front-runner Donald Trump first announced his temporary ban on non-citizen Muslims entering America, his idea was condemned by virtually the entire Republican Party.

Jeb Bush responded, “Seriously?”

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan addressed the nation to condemn it.

Even Ted Cruz wouldn’t support it.

But there’s one massive group of people that over
whelmingly backs Trump’s proposal for a temporary ban on Muslim immigration:  Republican primary voters.

A poll taken soon after Trump announced his plan in December showed almost two-thirds of Republican voters supported the GOP front-runner’s plan to ban Muslims from entering the U.S. And as the votes are cast in state after state, support for Trump’s proposal is actually higher in some areas.

In the Northeastern primaries held earlier this week, exit polls showed almost 70 percent of voters in New York and Pennsylvania supported Trump’s proposed ban. This narrowly exceeds the support expressed for the policy in supposedly more conservative Southern states.

G.M. Davis, who earned his doctorate in political science from Stanford University and is author of “House of War: Islam’s Jihad against the World,” said the widespread popular support for Trump’s policy shouldn’t be a shock to Republican leaders.  “It should not be surprising that Donald Trump’s proposal for a temporary halt to Muslim immigration has attracted such overwhelming support among Republican voters,” Davis told WND. “It is an eminently reasonable and moderate proposal, which one hopes will set the tone for more sweeping proposals as the campaign progresses.”

Davis continued, “It demonstrates that Mr. Trump understands the danger posed by Muslim immigration as well as the slanted politics of the issue, which routinely cast such proposals as his own as ‘extreme,’ ‘racist,’ etc. and which requires special handling from figures such as himself.”

Davis argued Republican leaders are committed to an agenda of globalization, which leads them to put political correctness ahead of national security.  “On the issue of Muslim immigration, perhaps more than any other, ordinary voters and the establishment of both parties are divided,” Davis said. “Really, the establishment is happy to give voters whatever they like as long as the general program of globalization continues to move forward. That program entails the continued demolition of national borders, the mixing of national, religious and ethnic populations, and the general dissolution of local and regional distinctions of all sorts around which ordinary people can rally to defend their traditional freedoms.

“Ongoing immigration, especially Muslim immigration, is central to the general plan of eroding national integrity and identity, which is exactly why the establishment loves it and ordinary voters hate it.”  In fact, support for a temporary ban on Muslim entry far exceeds support for Trump himself.

Large majorities support the policy even in states that voted against Trump. In Texas, which backed his Republican rival, Ted Cruz, 67 percent of GOP voters supported Trump’s policy proposal. In Wisconsin, where Trump was savaged by conservative talk radio and suffered a stinging defeat at Cruz’s hands, 69 percent agreed with Trump on banning Muslim entry into the country. Sixty-five percent of Republican primary voters in Ohio also supported Trump’s idea, even though the state went to Gov. John Kasich.

Pamela Geller, an activist who speaks out against extremist Islam and the author of “Stop the Islamization of America,” is one of those voters who supports Trump’s policy while not supporting Trump himself.
Geller, who has endorsed Cruz, called Trump “questionable on the free speech issue” after Trump criticized her for hosting a contest featuring images of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. However, she called Trump’s idea “a common-sense solution.”

Make YOUR voice heard! Sign the petition to impose a temporary halt to all Muslim immigration to our country.

“There is no way to vet for jihadis or distinguish them from peaceful Muslims,” Geller told WND. “Trump’s idea is so popular because people see the problem of jihad and see how our leaders are not dealing with it adequately. No one who had denounced Trump for suggesting this has come up with an alternate plan.”

Davis also said the whole issue of Muslim immigration and entry into the United States is bigger than Trump himself.  “Even a mere political opportunist ought to be able to see the vote-winning potential on the issue,” claimed Davis. “Westerners, Europeans and Americans are increasingly waking up to the nightmare of having their lands invaded by a hostile ideology that recognizes nothing of their own as sacred: not Christianity, not women’s rights, not freedom of speech, not responsible, secular government. 

Regardless of how the 2016 election turns out, the issue of Muslim immigration will persist, either as a focus of policy in a Trump (or possibly Cruz??) administration or as an ever-growing elephant in the room of a Clinton administration.”

The issue is likely to increase in importance as investigations continue into the Dec. 2, 2015, terrorist attacks in San Bernadino, California. On Thursday, the brother of Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernadino attackers, was arrested and charged with marriage fraud, conspiracy and lying under oath. Two other individuals related to Farook were also arrested.

Philip Haney, a former Customs and Border Protection Officer who won numerous awards and commendations during his long career for analyzing intelligence and identifying terrorists, argued said in December the San Bernadino attacks could have been prevented if the federal government hadn’t shut down his investigation for fear of profiling Muslims. He chronicles his experiences in the new book “See Something, Say Nothing.”

Haney told WND there is a lack of political will to carry out the laws needed to protect the American people.
“I support enforcement of our constitutionally mandated immigration laws, so that we can more effectively protect our country from threats both foreign and domestic,” he said. “The flaws in our current vetting system are well documented. They are fixable, but only if there is concerted effort.”

However, Haney expressed some doubts about Trump’s plan, arguing it was too vague.  “He needs to clearly define ‘temporary’ and define exactly what he hopes to accomplish during the halt,” he said.  Regardless, Haney argues both Republicans and Democrats need to start taking the threat of terrorism seriously because the American people won’t settle for anything less.
“This is not just a partisan issue but a national security issue,” the former intelligence analyst warned. “The primary responsibility of our elected officials, regardless of their party affiliation, is to do their utmost to protect American citizens from those who seek to enter our country in order to do us harm.”

Haney concluded, “For almost eight years, the Obama administration has supposedly been advising the American people if they ‘see something,’ they need to ‘say something.’ Well, what the American people are seeing today is very disturbing, and the support for Trump’s idea shows they are saying something, too.”


Make YOUR voice heard! Sign the petition to impose a temporary halt to all Muslim immigration to our country.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/for-1-key-group-trumps-muslim-ban-is-yuuge/#wC7H0d6ke7JUikIJ.99

LEAKED DOCUMENTS EXPOSE CHEMTRAILING OPERATION

NASA HACKED:

LEAKED DOCUMENTS EXPOSE 

CHEMTRAILING OPERATION

 

Published on Feb 1, 2016

WWW.TRUNEWS.COM
NASA hacked: leaked documents expose chemtrailing operation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT06a...
Anonsec has leaked information they claim originated from NASA’s internal network, showing evidence of an extensive drone weather modification program.
Read the article here: https://www.trunews.com/nasa-hacked-l...

Jim Willie - Dollar Death by Gold - Important!

 

 

04/26/16 Jim Willie | Dollar Death by Gold

• Duration: 14 minutes

Dutchsinse : IT HAPPENED AGAIN!

Dutchsinse

4/28/2016 — It happened again — Two large M7.0 + M6.9 Earthquakes struck back to back across the Pacific by Michael Janitch A large M6.9 (M7.0) earthquake has struck off the coast of Central America / Mexico. This follows a M7.0 in the West Pacific a few hours ago. This now makes TWO TIMES in the past 2 weeks that M7.0 earthquakes struck the West Pacific then the East Pacific. Just over a week ago, Japan was struck by a mid-M7.0 earthquakethen Ecuador was struck by a M7.0 earthquake several hours later. A week ago, after the back to back M7.0+ earthquakes across the Pacific, professionals DENIED that earthquakes are related across the plate.... I chastised them last week for denying the obvious... now we see the same thing occur again... back to back M7.0 earthquakes on each side of the Pacific within hours of each other. Earthquakes ARE related over a distance, and professionals were wrong to deny a connection. I stand by the science on this, not their dogmas... thus I say again.. EARTHQUAKES ARE RELATED ACROSS DISTANCES. ______ I'm so glad I made these posts last week! Now I'm vindicated beyond any shadow of doubt. It is now proved that earthquake progression is occurring across vast distances in short periods of time, earthquakes are related, one earthquake can cause another similar magnitude earthquake elsewhere (sometimes very far away), and that earthquakes can indeed be forecast if you take these factors into account. 4/22/2016 — Earthquake Progression 101 — How pressure transfers across plates + Earthquakes are Related 4/21/2016 — Craton / Plate movement from West to East OVER 1 HOURS TIME ____ The professionals denied a relation between earthquakes in the West + East Pacific even last week.  Professor John Vidale came out to publicly deny a relation between the Japan and Ecaudor M7.0 earthquakes , to deny a West and East Pacific earthquake relation. Professor Vidale and other well known old thinking Geologists came out over the past week and made BOLD claims that earthquakes are NOT related across the Pacific (or anywhere else). Read their unscientific denials from this past week here: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/04/17/timing-massive-quakes-around-globe-coincidence/83156262/ “As far as we can tell, these earthquakes aren’t related,” said John Vidale, director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network at the University of Washington. “We’ve had plenty of much bigger earthquakes that still don’t trigger earthquakes far away. It’s fairly clear that it’s just a coincidence.” They were wrong to issue this story last week! Makes them look blockheaded to say the least. By the way, after doing a detailed search, there was only one person who made an actual post on the internet saying the Japan + Ecuador earthquakes were related... guess who that person was (is)?! :D _____ Information on this M6.9 from the USGS: M6.8 - Northern East Pacific Rise http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us10005cc4#origin Magnitude 6.8 mwp Location/uncertainty 10.251°N 103.762°W± 8.9 km Depth/uncertainty 10.0 km± 1.9 Origin Time 2016-04-29 01:33:38.820 UTC Number of Stations – Number of Phases 94 Minimum Distance 984.6 km (8.85°) Travel Time Residual 1.03 s Azimuthal Gap 63° FE Region NORTHERN EAST PACIFIC RISE (730) ______ Michael Janitch | April 28, 2016 at 9:45 pm http://dutchsinse.com/4282016-it-happened-again-two-large-m7-0-m6-9-earthquakes-struck-back-to-back-across-the-pacific/

BOEHNER CALLS CRUZ ‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH' !

John Boehner likened Ted Cruz to the devil on Wednesday


Dylan Stableford

Senior editor

April 28, 2016

 

Former House Speaker John Boehner offered a rather blunt assessment of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Wednesday night.  “Lucifer in the flesh,” Boehner said during a talk hosted by Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif., according to the Stanford Daily. “I have Democrat friends and Republican friends. I get along with almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life.”

The Ohio Republican, who retired from Congress last fall, said he would vote for whomever the party nominates for president — unless it’s Cruz.  Boehner described the other two GOP hopefuls, Donald Trump and John Kasich, as his “friends.”

Boehner said he has played golf with Trump for years and that they were “texting buddies.” His relationship with the Ohio governor, however, “requires more effort on my behalf than all my other friends … but he’s still my friend, and I love him.”

Cruz, who introduced Carly Fiorina as his running mate on Wednesday, responded to Boehner’s barb on Twitter Thursday morning.  “Tell me again who will stand up to Washington?” the Texas senator tweeted. “Trump, who’s Boehner’s ‘texting and golfing buddy,’ or Carly & me?”

"He allowed his inner Trump to come out,” Cruz said later at a press conference in Indiana. “I think John Boehner has made it crystal clear … if you want a president like John Boehner, Donald Trump is your man.”

On the Democratic side, Boehner called Bernie Sanders “a nice guy” and “the most honest politician” in the race despite disagreeing with the Vermont senator on virtually every issue. But Boehner drew boos from the audience for suggesting Hillary Clinton is pandering to female voters. "Oh, I’m a woman, vote for me,’” he reportedly said.

And while Boehner believes Clinton will ultimately win the Democratic nomination, there could be more twists in store. “Don’t be shocked if two weeks before the convention, here comes Joe Biden parachuting in and Obama fanning the flames to make it all happen,” he  said.

While waiting at San Francisco International Airport for his flight back to Washington, D.C., Boehner didn’t back away from the comments and seemed surprised that they caused such a stir. “It’s not like I haven’t said  the same thing in a bunch of speeches this year,” the  former House speaker told Yahoo News.

During an appearance at a financial conference in Florida last month, Boehner, who had previously labeled Cruz a “jackass,” referred to the Texas senator as “Lucifer.”

At the same event, Boehner endorsed his successor, House Speaker Paul Ryan, for president. “If we don’t have a nominee who can win on the first ballot, I’m for none of the above,” Boehner said, according to Politico. “They all had a chance to win. None of them won. So I’m for none of the above. I’m for Paul Ryan to be our nominee.”

But Boehner told Yahoo News he thinks Trump will win the nomination, barring a major self-inflicted error.

 https://www.yahoo.com/news/boehner-cruz-lucifer-in-the-flesh-145118346.html

Email Privacy Reform Bill H.R. 699

House  Advances   Email  Privacy  Act,  Setting  the  Stage  for  Vital  Privacy Reform

House of Representatives Agrees That 30 Years Is Long Enough, Pushes Much-Needed Email Privacy Reform Bill to the Senate

April 27, 2016
Sophia Cope 

The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Email Privacy Act (H.R. 699) today, which would require the government to get a probable cause warrant from a judge before obtaining private communications and documents stored online with companies such as Google, Facebook, and Dropbox.

The bill provides a long-overdue update to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), first passed in 1986. The bill also codifies the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in U.S. v. Warshak, which held that the Fourth Amendment demands that the government first obtain a warrant before accessing emails stored with cloud service providers.

The House vote is historic, given that H.R. 699 has an amazing 315 cosponsors, almost three quarters of the entire House. The House voted unanimously, following a unanimous vote by the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month.

EFF has pushed for an update to ECPA for over six years as part of the Digital Due Process Coalition, which is comprised of civil society groups and technology companies. Today’s win is also the result of efforts by EFF supporters across the country, who have kept a steady drumbeat of pressure on Congress to reform ECPA.

While we applaud the passage of H.R. 699, the bill isn’t perfect. In particular, the Email Privacy Act doesn’t require the government to notify users when it seeks their online data from service providers, a vital safeguard ensuring users can obtain legal counsel to fight for their rights. However, companies may continue to provide notice to users of government requests—prior to compliance—something many companies commit to in our annual Who Has Your Back report.

The government should also be required to obtain a warrant when demanding a person’s geolocation data.
And if the government does obtain any communications data in violation of the law, courts should have the ability to suppress that evidence in criminal prosecutions.

Despite these drawbacks, H.R. 699 is a win for user privacy. We thank the bill’s chief sponsors, Reps. Yoder (R-KS), Polis (D-CO), and Graves (R-GA), and House Majority Leader McCarthy (R-CA) for scheduling today’s vote. 

We urge the Senate to pass the Email Privacy Act without any weakening amendments before the 114th Congress ends in January. 

Please contact your Senators and demand their support for strong privacy protections for your online data!

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/house-advances-email-privacy-act-setting-stage-vital-privacy-reform?AID=7236

Obama scorned for putting his nose where British lawmakers said it didn’t belong.

Queen to Obama: "Don’t Burn My Lawn This Time!"

"She rarely imposes her will but when she does ..."

Kevin Whitson 

April 26, 2016 at 9:43am

England’s Queen Elizabeth II turned 90 this week and dignitaries from all over the world came to celebrate, including President Obama. However, this time, the birthday girl put her foot down and refused to allow the Obama entourage to have their way with how they arrived and comported.

In 2011, when the U.S. commander in chief came to town, he left a trail of destruction in his wake at Windsor Castle, the queen’s home and favorite of all residences. His helicopters, all six of them, scorched the earth at the castle and left landing-gear divots in the manicured lawn.

The Express reported the queen was not amused and required the president to use three helicopters during this year’s visit, to minimize the damage to the castle’s grounds. The Express’ Alix Culbertson wrote, “She said only three helicopters, including the president’s personal aircraft Marine One, could land on the lawn when Mr. Obama, 54, and his wife, Michelle, 52, came for dinner with the Queen and Prince Philip to celebrate her 90th birthday.” Also reported as a requirement was for the president’s security detail to remain outside the Windsor dining hall during the dining hour.

Apparently, it took some time for the Secret Service to come around to the matriarch’s way of thinking but eventually the queen’s demands were met. An inside source reportedly told the Express, “She rarely imposes her will but, when she does, people listen – it just took the US Secret Service agents a little time to realise that.” 

The president’s men complied and the event went over without any incidents reported save the complete shutdown of air traffic over London when the president’s choppers arrived. The choppers were also reportedly escorted by F-22 Raptors poised to shoot down any airborne threats against the president and first lady.

Just a day prior to the birthday celebration, Obama opined the United Kingdom should stay in the European Union, which resulted in the president being scorned for putting his nose where British lawmakers said it didn’t belong. The president has been urging lawmakers of the British parliament to remain in the EU, an urging that, as Western Journalism previously reported, resulted in parliamentarians drafting an open letter urging the U.S. president to mind his own business.

The queen’s birthday celebration was a reported success. And Obama even remarked how “adorable” Prince George was when the president had dinner with Prince William, Kate Middleton and Prince Harry the evening before the queen’s birthday bash.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/queen-to-obama-dont-burn-my-lawn-this-time/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_campaign=ConservativeBrief&utm_content=2016-04-27 

 

calling-out-john-daresh-and-nla-round-two-by-anna-von-reitz/

Posted on April 29, 2016 by David Robinson

Today, I will address Daresh’s “Information”— which should rightly be titled, “Disinformation” issued a couple days ago.  I quote:
Daresh:   “This brings us to the main purpose of this Information: Government agent provocateurs have been fueling a quasi-shadow government movement that essentially advocates the overthrow of the government.”
Anna:  What government?  A corporation run by international banking cartels is not our government, is it?  In fact, a corporation doesn’t actually have the capacity to act as a sovereign government at all and we are merely stretching euphemism beyond its limit to pretend that it does.
Daresh:  People in this movement, led by de facto Judge Anna Von Reitz, de facto Judge Bruce Doucette and de facto god-graced Administrator Joaquin Folch, who have taken on these self-appointed titles, are duping people from the liberty movements looking for a solution to the subversion within our government who, being ignorant of the law, fall prey to the Pied Pipers .
Anna:  There are no “self-appointed titles” involved including “Pied Piper” and nothing “de facto” about it. Everything we’ve done is firmly based on existing Law.   We are filling vacated public offices that are owed to our own de jure government.  When we offered to show Daresh the facts, he wouldn’t look.  His response was rump in the air, head in the sand.  So there he sits, ignorant as ever, making irresponsible accusations.  NLA deserves far, far better leadership, thank you.
Read the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) for yourselves and then read my explanation of how all this happened in the “Common Law vs. Admiralty Law” article posted at www.annavonreitz.com.
Daresh:  Many who are following these de facto judges, actually believe them to be properly elected or appointed.
Anna:  We are properly elected Common Law Judges but Daresh mistakenly thinks that we are “supposed to be” Admiralty Judges instead.  He expected me to be a Bar Attorney—that’s how far behind the curve he really is.  “Oh, look, Dick, there’s a squirrel…..no, Jane, it’s a cat with a fluffy tail….”
Daresh:  Even we thought for a while that Anna Von Reitz was an Alaskan Supreme Court Judge. We spent many months attempting to verify whether she was even a real person.
 Anna:  Hahahahahahah!  I have been here in the same spot since 1992 as thousands of people who have contacted me directly and honestly can confirm.  The key words here are “honestly and directly”.
I sent Daresh an original wet-ink copy of our American Affidavit of Probable Cause complete with all my contact information last July and I have the mailing receipts to prove it.   Did he call me?  No.  Did he email me?  No.  Did he write me a letter?  No.  Ask me any questions? No.
Let’s just say all those “months” they tried so hard to “verify” my existence could have been settled with a phone call and weren’t.  Daresh wasn’t looking for me.  He was trying to avoid me and to avoid taking action on our affidavit.
Daresh:  But, when she finally surfaced……
Anna:  Yeah, right, as if I was hiding.  That’s why I issue all my documents, books, articles, everything, with current contact information?
 Daresh:  …..We saw that she was connected to this quasi-shadow government movement that we have been hearing about; but we had yet to identify the people who are part of this movement until now. We believe the leaders of this movement are fueled by government agent provocateurs.
Anna:  Daresh is so clueless that he appears not to know what the “shadow government” is or what the phrase means—- let me enlighten him (and everyone else who needs to know). The Shadow Government was put in place by FDR many long years ago.  It refers to all the appointed offices and agencies that have been promulgating their own rules —like the FBI and FEMA and IRS and DHS— and then left to run rampant over the people who pay their wages.
This “government by political appointment” is the “Shadow Government” — as defined by those who first coined the term back in the 1930’s and 40’s. —-and not coincidentally, it was the “Shadow Government” that murdered LaVoy Finicum.
All those so senselessly and groundlessly accused—myself, Judge Doucette, and the others— not only support the Common Law Grand Jury Movement, we are committed to restoring the entire American Common Law Court System.
Anyone who supports the resurrection of the Common Law Grand Juries ought to, as a matter of logic and principle, also support the restoration of the American Common Law Court System that gave the CLGJ’s birth and meaning and enforcement in this country for over 350 years.
But not John Daresh.
He wants to pretend that the restoration of our own Common Law Court System including the Common Law Grand Jury portion of it —-is a plot, an attempt to “overthrow the government”.  What a Logic Failure.  Grade “F”.
There are a number of reasons why our effort to restore our entire court system cannot be construed as any act of “insurrection” or attempt to “overthrow” any government.
First, there’s the plain fact that we haven’t advocated any such thing.
Second, there’s the fact that no foreign corporation is competent to act as a sovereign government with respect to us and these United States, so the concept of “insurrection” doesn’t apply.
Third, there’s the fact that just as we are heir to the Common Law Grand Jury we are heir to the entire American Common Law Court System as well.  If we are owed one part of it, we are owed the whole of it.
The many good people associated with NLA who are trying to restore the Common Law Grand Juries don’t deserve “leadership” that tells lies and causes trouble, nor do they need a truncated vision that leaves their Grand Juries spinning their wheels, going nowhere.
The simple fact is that the Grand Juries are meant to be part of the whole American Common Law Court System and without the whole Court functioning in support of their actions, the Grand Juries are about as useless as a windmill on a still day.  They can hand down presentments and informations and writs until they are blue in the face and have nothing to show for their effort but a thank you from John Daresh.
This is what we are trying to tell NLA, and if you stop and think about it, you will realize that what we are telling you is true.

 https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2016/04/29/calling-out-john-daresh-and-nla-round-two-by-anna-von-reitz/

National Assembly Conference Call For Information

National Assembly Conference Call

For Information

(Sponsored by Michigan General Jural Assembly=MGJA)

1stmichiganassembly.info

Welcome to the National Assembly Conference Call – This is the next step in acquiring accurate information to assist you in settling your county and state.

Please follow the steps outlined here to access this important educational conference call.

Join our Conference Call EVERY OTHER Thursday evening:

6pm Pacific – 7pm Mountain

8pm Central – 9pm Eastern

Talk Shoe Call # 724-444-7444

Access Code 140924# Guest 1#

To listen with your computer:

http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/140924

Next Call Scheduled for 

Thursday May 12,2016