Showing posts sorted by date for query paul ryan. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query paul ryan. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, January 13, 2019

[TOPIC] Update on US dollar standing Bix Weir very important info- Clinton memo killed 1/2 million people - Secret Space Program Whistleblowers Claim our Technology 1000 Years Ahead - California HighSpeed Rail connected to Paradise Murder Spree -


If you are subscribed to NesaraNews in order to see the video's you will need to click on the [TOPIC] head line. It appears the video's are not loading in the email.

TheHill.com

McConnell blocks House bills to reopen government

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Thursday blocked two House-passed funding bills that would reopen the federal government....Continue article here

Tuesday, January 1, 2019

NO ONE CAN DEMONSTRATE THE LEGITIMACY OF A CORPORATION FUNCTIONING AS A LAWFUL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE: Open Letter to President Trump – December 31, 2018




arnie

Monday, December 24, 2018

Lawsuit Reveals Ties of Steele Dossier to John McCain, Paul Ryan, and Obama White House


#SPYGATE
DECLASSIFIED


🔹 Notable Recent Story CLINTON FOUNDATION: SEVEN EXAMPLES OF PAY TO PLAY? ► https://bit.ly/2SETSwN #SPYGATE - COLLUSION SCANDAL BIGGER THAN WATERGATE [PART1/2] ► https://bit.ly/2QrAjf2

Thursday, December 20, 2018

qanon.pub New Q posts 12/20/18


http://qanon.pub
2630
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 7f3573 No.4392219 📁
DUBNPg9WAAAjvTj.jpg⬇
DkNHoWxW0AU2ODy.jpg⬇
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mccain-associate-gave-unverified-steele-dossier-to-buzzfeed-court-filing-says📁
Future proves past.
News unlocks.
You have more than you know.
"….and House Speaker Paul Ryan’s chief of staff, John Burks."
When did Paul Ryan announce he was retiring?
Why would the Speaker of the House retire?
Age of Paul Ryan?
Sometimes reading between the lines demonstrates those complicit in treasonous / traitorous acts are no longer (or soon to be) in positions of power.
Forced?
R's easier to remove than D's?
D's holding on to power as long as possible hoping to sway pending action [cover]?
Think DECLAS.
Think SC.
………..
How many senior FBI & DOJ officials have been removed?
None left by choice.
Nothing To See Here.
Nothing is being done.
The Biggest 'ACCURATE' Conspiracy….
FAKE NEWS ATTACKS DEMONSTRATE WHAT?
Q

Thursday, November 1, 2018

a BURGLAR who enters your house to give birth to a baby..does that baby then become your responsibility for life


From:  Jackie Juntti;  W.G.E.N.; via Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr

This is the missing info that is being ignored in this debate.  It is the danger that looms in every piece of legislation when some traitor inserts *footnotes* after the bill has been passed but before it is recorded into law.  As I stated in an earlier post - Does a BURGLAR who enters your house and while in your house happens to give birth to a baby IN YOUR HOUSE - does that baby then become your responsibility for life or should that burglar and her baby be prosecuted and removed??

Thanks to Kelleigh Nelson for this important information.  

The anchor baby scam was invented 35 years ago by a liberal zealot, Justice William Brennan, who slipped a footnote into a 1982 Supreme Court opinion announcing that the children born to illegals on U.S. soil are citizens.  Unconstitutional poppycock.

Senator Jacob Howard who introduced the 14th amendment’s citizenship clause, said its grant of citizenship would not include persons born in the US who are foreigners or aliens.

Jackie Juntti

WGEN  idzrus@earthlink.net


Re: SP/INS: Trump claims the 14th Amendment DOESN'T grant citizenship to 'Anchor Babies' of illegal immigrants

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6338015/Trump-claims-14th-Amendment-DOESNT-grant-citizenship-Anchor-Babies.html

Trump claims the 14th Amendment DOESN'T grant citizenship to 'Anchor Babies' of illegal immigrants – and cites retired Democratic senator's argument as he predicts Supreme Court will have to decide
  • President said he wants to sign an executive order ending birthright citizenship
  • Trump said the current policy is 'ridiculous. It's ridiculous. And it has to end'
  • On Wednesday he claimed the Constitution's 14th Amendment has limits
  • Trump noted that it applies to people 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the U.S., implying that illegal immigrants don't qualify
  • He cited former Democratic Sen. Harry Reid in 1993, complaining that the U.S. offers a citizenship incentive for illegal immigrants to have babies here
  • VP Mike Pence says the Supreme Court has been silent on how the Fourteenth Amendment relates to illegal immigrants
  • House Speaker Paul Ryan insists Trump can't make a change without Congress or a new constitutional amendment
By DAVID MARTOSKO, U.S. POLITICAL EDITOR FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

PUBLISHED: 10:32 EDT, 31 October 2018 | UPDATED: 10:49 EDT, 31 October 2018
View comments
President Donald Trump doubled down Wednesday on his claim that the U.S. Constitution doesn't grant automatic citizenship to every child born inside the country's borders. 

He predicted the Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question, reintroduced the controversial term 'anchor baby' into the national debate and cited a retired Democratic Senate leader to support his argument. 

'So-called Birthright Citizenship, which costs our Country billions of dollars and is very unfair to our citizens, will be ended one way or the other,' Trump tweeted.

'It is not covered by the 14th Amendment because of the words "subject to the jurisdiction thereof", the president added, before cutting his message off in mid-sentence and pausing for nearly an hour before continuing.

'Harry Reid was right in 1993, before he and the Democrats went insane,' Trump claimed, referring to a now-infamous Senate floor speech in which Reid, a Nevada Democrat and future Senate majority leader, blasted the practice of birthright citizenship.
__
President Donald Trump says he wants to end the tradition of co
+11
President Donald Trump says he wants to end the tradition of conferring U.S. citizenship on babies born inside the country's borders regardless of whether their parents are Americans
__
Trump tweeted Wednesday that the Constitution's Fourteenth Amen
+11
Trump tweeted Wednesday that the Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment only applies to people who aren't 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the U.S. – meaning in his view that babies born to people in the country illegally don't enjoy its benefits
The president cited Democrat Harry Reid, who was a Nevada senat
+11
The president cited Democrat Harry Reid, who was a Nevada senator in 1993 when he said 'no sane country' would grant automatic citizenship to babies born to illegal immigrant mothers

'If making it easy to be an illegal immigrant isn't enough, how about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant? No sane country would do that, right? Guess again,' Reid said in 1993. 

'If you break our laws by entering our country without permission to give birth to a child, we reward that child with U.S. citizenship and guarantee a full access to all public and social services this society provides, and that's a lot of services. Is it any wonder that two-thirds of the babies born at taxpayer expense in county-run hospitals in Los Angeles are born to illegal alien mothers?' 

In a typical year about 250,000 illegal immigrants give birth in the U.S., driving conservative Republicans to stoke controversy about their long-term impacts on welfare systems, education costs and other drivers of the national debt. 

Current national policy stems from an 1898 Supreme Court ruling, but the high court has never spoken on the question of whether the 14th Amendment covers children born to people inside the U.S. illegally. 

On Wednesday Trump suggested Democrats' conversion away from Reid's 1993 positon is tied to the party's acceptance of an 'open borders' philosophy 'which brings massive Crime.'
'Don’t forget the nasty term Anchor Babies,' he added. 'I will keep our Country safe. This case will be settled by the United States Supreme Court!'
__
'If making it easy to be an illegal immigrant isn't enough, how
+11
'If making it easy to be an illegal immigrant isn't enough, how about offering a reward for being an illegal immigrant? No sane country would do that, right? Guess again,' Nevada Democratic Sen. Harry Reid said in 1993, years before he became the Senate  majority leader

RELATED ARTICLES

-- 
Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot >  http://conpats.blogspot.com

Saturday, October 27, 2018

What do Doctors actually learn in Medical School about Vaccines?


shared by OOM2
Posted: 25 Oct 2018 09:29 PM PDT

What do Doctors Learn in Medical School About Vaccines?





What Doctors Learn in Medical School About Vaccines
by Marco Cáceres
The Vaccine Reaction
The idea that there are “medical experts” who, by virtue of the MD initials placed after their names, automatically know more than anyone else about vaccines is pervasive.
This commonly held belief persists, despite overwhelming evidence that doctors are taught almost nothing about vaccines in medical school.
Doctors are taught that vaccines have saved the world from infectious diseases and they are taught to follow the vaccine schedule promoted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—which tells them which vaccines to give and when.
They’re taught that they must always abide by the schedule and vaccinate every patient. That’s pretty much it.
Yes, it’s hard to believe, but don’t take my word for it.
In an article I wrote several years ago titled “Doctors Are No Experts On Vaccines,” I included quotes from several medical doctors to backup my allegation.1
There is the following quote from biochemist Boyd Haley, PhD, who taught at the University of Kentucky Medical Center in Lexington:
I can tell you, having been in a medical center, having taught biochemistry to medical students, and talking to hundreds of medical doctors, they get very little training in toxicology… I mean, no courses that are specifically designed, such as a PhD student in toxicology would have, or a PhD student in biochemistry.
They don’t understand it at all. They are not trained to evaluate the toxic effects of chemicals, especially at the research level.
One, they don’t do research programs, they don’t have the insight that’s developed and required for someone writing a PhD thesis in toxicology or biochemistry of materials that inhibit enzymes.
They just don’t understand the science and the chemistry at that level. And certainly pediatricians don’t.12

It turns out that this is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many testimonies by medical doctors (and professors who taught them) regarding how little they learned about vaccines in medical school.
It is important to listen to them so that the magnitude of the myth that physicians are the experts on vaccines can fully sink in.
It is time to put this myth to rest because it is too often used as a way to disparage anyone who dares to disagree or even mildly question doctors about the safety and effectiveness of vaccination.
Case in point, there was an article published recently in The Conversation titled “Why vaccine opponents think they know more than medical experts.”
The article is essentially a hit piece on anyone who refuses to toe the line and agree with “medical experts” that the benefits of vaccination always outweighs the risks.
The authors, Matthew Motta, Steven Sylvester and Timothy Callaghan, argue that “anti-vaxxers” may suffer from a cognitive bias known in the field of psychology as the “Dunning-Kruger effect.” They ask:
Could the inability of anti-vaxxers to accurately appraise their own knowledge and skills compared to those of medical experts play a role in shaping their attitudes about vaccines?
This inability to accurately appraise one’s own knowledge is called the Dunning-Kruger effect, first identified in social psychology. Dunning-Kruger effects occur when individuals’ lack of knowledge about a particular subject leads them to inaccurately gauge their expertise on that subject.
Ignorance of one’s own ignorance can lead people who lack knowledge on a subject think of themselves as more expert than those who are comparatively better informed.3

You see what they did there? Of course, the problem with this cynical attack strategy is that it is based on a key faulty assumption—that the only way you can possibly know what you’re talking about when it comes to vaccines is if you have gone to medical school so you can put MD initials after your name.
According to Ramon Ramos, MD:
“The only thing we learned in [medical] school was that there was a program and that we should follow that vaccine program. As to the vaccine itself and the contents of the vaccines, no we didn’t study that. We assumed that what the pharmaceuticals, that what they did and the CDC accepted, that that’s the way it is.”45

Paul Thomas, MD recollected:
“We got a lot of microbiology, we learned about diseases, and we learned that vaccines were the solution to those diseases that, what they say, are ‘vaccine preventable.’ But, actually, what was in the vaccines, I don’t remember really learning anything. … I was never taught, when I was in medical school 30 years ago, what was in a vaccine. We were only taught they’re wonderful.”46

This lack of knowledge about vaccine ingredients and how vaccines can affect immune and brain function should be of particular concern to anyone getting a vaccine from a doctor.
“You’d be amazed at the number of physicians, you ask them what’s in a vaccine?” said neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, MD. “They’ll say, well, there’s the bacteria, the virus you want to vaccinate against, and then there’s a little immune stimulant in there to help stimulate the immunity so they react against those viral antigens.”78

Dr. Blaylock points out:
They don’t know about these other chemicals in there like formaldehyde, special proteins, special lipids that are known to be brain toxic, that are known to induce autoimmunity in the brain. They’re not aware of that. They don’t know that MSG is in a lot of vaccines―monosodium glutamate, a brain excitotoxin. They’re not aware of what’s in the vaccine they’re giving.78

“We learned what [vaccines] were, what the diseases were,” said Joseph Mercola, DO.
“We probably learned more about the diseases and, of course, everyone accepted the dogma that vaccines work. There was just no critical analysis about the pros and cons. It was never discussed, let alone the side effects.”4

“I don’t remember them teaching me anything about adverse effects… at all,” said Patricia Ryan, MD.
“They just wanted you to memorize the schedule and make sure you knew when to give [the vaccines].”9

James Neuenschwander, MD recalled that, when he went to medical school more than 30 years ago, there was “not much training at all” on vaccines.
“I don’t know that it’s changed very much,” he said. “Basically, it was… here’s the schedule. These are the saviors of mankind, they are safe, and you need to make sure everybody’s vaccinated.”10

“We were told that vaccines are safe and effective, here’s the schedule, ignore the inserts… that’s lawyer jargon,” recalled Cammy Benton, MD.
“I think in medical school you’re learning so much that it’s kind of difficult to learn, that you assumed [with] vaccines the science was settled, tried and true. So you just didn’t question it, that was the easy part… okay, this is for sure.  So you just accept it.”11

I could go on and on with examples of how doctors admit they are taught almost nothing in medical school about vaccines except to give them to everyone.
But you get the idea.
I’ll end with an observation by Stephanie Christner, DO, whose infant daughter did not survive vaccination:
I never learned in medical school how vaccines were studied, what type of clinical trials they went through, how they evaluated adverse reactions… how they even evaluated effectiveness.
So, after Victoria died, I started reading everything that is put out there.
Anything that would lead me to a topic, then I would Google that topic… and if there were textbooks in relation to that topic, I would order them and then, based on reading that book, I would order another book. What I have learned has shocked me. 12

In conclusion, medical school does not train future doctors to be vaccine experts. In fact, unless they took personal initiative and independently studied up on vaccines, those who graduate from medical school tend to be functionally illiterate about the subject.
This aura of all-knowingness surrounding physicians, the common belief that they are vaccine experts, is wholly undeserved. That is why, increasingly, people are hesitant to rely solely on pediatricians and other medical doctors for guidance when it comes to vaccination, especially parents making a vaccine decision for their child.
It has nothing do with any kind of cognitive bias. It has to do with trust.
Read the full article at TheVaccineReaction.org.
Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.

References:


1 Cáceres M. Doctors Are No Experts on VaccinesThe Vaccine Reaction Nov. 28, 2015.
2 Vaccines Are Not Safe. YouTube.com Mar. 13, 2014 (published by 999solomon999).
3 Motta M, Sylvester S, Callaghan T. Why vaccine opponents think they know more than medical expertsThe Conversation July 12, 2018.
4 Vaxxed TV. How Much Is Taught on Vaccines In Medical School? YouTube.com Feb. 18, 2017 (published).
5 Vaxxed TV. VaxXed Tour: Dr. Ramon Ramos. YouTube.com Jan. 16, 2017 (published).
6 The Truth About Vaccines. The Truth About Vaccines Docu-series – Episode 1. YouTube.com Apr. 13, 2017 (published).
7 Cáceres M. Those Who Give Vaccines Should Know The Ingredients in VaccinesThe Vaccine Reaction Oct. 12, 2017.
8 Dr. Russell Blaylock MD Dangers of Vaccines. (start at 15:51) YouTube.com May 18, 2014 (published).
9 Vaxxed TV. VaxXed Stories: Doctor Patricia Ryan in Nebraska. YouTube.com Dec. 11. 2016 (published).
10 Vaxxed TV. James Neuenschwander MD. YouTube.com Sept. 2, 2017 (published).
11 Health Impact News. Dr. Cammy Benton MD Interview from VAXXED Team. YouTube.com Nov. 8, 2017 (published).
12 Vaxxed TV.  Dr. Stephanie Christner on vaccines. YouTube.com Jan. 15, 2017 (published).


Thanks to: http://healthimpactnews.com