Friday, July 27, 2012

DEMOCRATS ADDING GUN CONTROL TO CYBER SECURITY BILL

It's the same old unconstitutional gang doing their dirty work again...


 




THE HILL


DEMOCRATS ADDING GUN CONTROL TO CYBER SECURITY BILL
By Ramsey Cox - 07/26/12 07:29 PM ET
Democratic senators have offered an amendment to the cybersecurity bill that would limit the purchase of high capacity gun magazines for some consumers.
Shortly after the Cybersecurity Act gained Senate approval to proceed to filing proposed amendments and a vote next week, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), a sponsor of the gun control amendment, came to the floor to defend the idea of implementing some “reasonable” gun control measures.

The amendment was sponsored by Democratic Sens. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Bob Menendez (N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Schumer and Dianne Feinstein (Calif.). S.A. 2575 would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition with the exception of .22 caliber rim fire ammunition.
The amendment is identical to a separate bill sponsored by Lautenberg. Feinstein was the sponsor of the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.

The proposed amendment would only affect sales and transfers after the law took effect.
Schumer defended the Brady law and assault weapons ban on the floor Thursday evening, perhaps in preparation for the coming fight with Republicans and gun rights activists.
Schumer suggested that both the left and right find common ground.

“Maybe we could come together on guns if each side gave some,” Schumer said.
He suggested that Democrats make it clear that their goal is not to repeal the Second Amendment.
“The basic complaint is that the Chuck Schumers of the world want to take away your guns,” Schumer said of the argument made by gun lobbies. “I think it would be smart for those of us who want rational gun control to make it know that that’s not true at all.”

Schumer also pointed out that it would be reasonable for the right to recognize that background checks on those buying guns is necessary — as called for in the Brady law. He also said average Americans don’t need an assault weapon to go hunting or protect themselves.

“We can debate where to draw the line of reasonableness, but we might be able to come to an agreement in the middle,” Schumer said. “Maybe, maybe, maybe we can pass some laws that might, might, might stop some of the unnecessary casualties … maybe there’s a way we can some together and try to break through the log jam and make sure the country is a better place.”

Next week the Senate is expected to debate and vote on proposed amendments to the cybersecurity bill.
Updated at 9:30 p.m.

Nullify The Private Federal Reserve:

Nullify The Private Federal Reserve: Whether Our Non Representative Congress Wants Us To Or Not!

27 Jul
Nullify The Private Federal Reserve: Whether Our Non Representative Congress Wants Us To Or Not!
Presidential Candidate Ron Paul Holding The “Silver Circle”.
It was a big day for supporters of Sound Money – as Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed Bill passed the House 326-99.
But, it still needs to get through a very hostile Senate, where it will likely never see the light of day. So in closing tonight, a new approach – Ending the Fed. Whether Congress Wants us to or Not!

Harry Reid “Two Faces” Audit The Federal Reserve Bill.

Since its inception, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies have led to a decline of over 95% in the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar. As a result, there have been several attempts to reduce or even eliminate the Federal Reserve’s powers. Louis T. McFadden led efforts in the 1930s.
Wright Patman pressed again in the 1970s.
Henry Gonzalez got things moving in the 1990s.
And, Ron Paul has led the charge for more than twenty years now 2012.
In nearly eighty years, though, none of these efforts have succeeded. And, even with House passage of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed bill, it’s highly unlikely that the imperial Senate would ever allow light to be shed on the actions of its PRIVATE financial backer.
Resistance to these efforts is seriously entrenched. But yet, a large number of people across the political spectrum want to know what goes on behind the Fed’s curtain. And with calls to audit the federal reserve reaching a fevered pitch, it’s a good time to ask the basic question – is this even a worthy effort? Not to say that you should want a secret national bank, but rather – is this kind of activism the best place for you to put your energy…and hope?
Will lobbying the Senate get Harry Reid to allow a vote? Will calling Mitch McConnell change anything? Will Barack Obama or Mitt Romney allow such a bill to pass without their veto? I believe the answer to all these questions is a big, fat NO.
CARPET BAGGERS

PULLING THE RUG OUT

On the other hand, in contrast to attempts to put a stop to the Fed at the national level, a paper that William Greene presented at the Mises Institute’s “Austrian Scholars Conference” proposes an alternative approach to ending the Federal Reserve’s monopoly on the tax payers money.
United States Constitution ~ We The People!

The “Constitutional Tender Act”

is a bill template that can be introduced in every State legislature in the nation. Passage would return each of them to the Constitution’s “legal tender” provisions of Article I, Section 10: “No State Shall…make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts” Such a tactic would achieve the desired goal of abolishing the Federal Reserve system by attacking it from the bottom up – pulling the rug out from under it by working to make its functions irrelevant at the State and local level.
Under the Constitutional Tender Act, the State would be required to use only gold and silver coins – or their equivalents, such as checks or electronic transfers – for payments of any debt owed by or to the State. This includes things like taxes, fees, contract payments, and the like. All such payments would be required to be denominated in legal tender gold and silver U.S. coins, including Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, and pre-1965 90% silver coins.
The market would then require that all State-chartered banks – as well as any other bank acting as a depository for State funds – offer accounts denominated in those types of gold and silver coins, and to keep such accounts segregated from other types of accounts such as Federal Reserve Notes.

But that’s not all!

Not only would the use of Federal Reserve Notes by the State be made illegal; the use of legal tender U.S. gold and silver coins would be encouraged amongst the general population too – by eliminating sanctions against its use.

HOW IT PLAYS OUT

Passage of the Constitutional Tender Act would introduce currency competition with Federal Reserve Notes by outlawing their use in transactions with the State. Ordinary people, being required to pay their State taxes in gold and silver coins, would find it necessary to conduct some transactions with metal – including the use of checks and debit cards based on bank accounts denominated in such coins.
All businesses operating within the State, being required to pay their State sales taxes and license fees in gold and silver coins, would need to do the same. Most importantly, though, in order for businesses to acquire the amount of gold and silver needed, they find it necessary to offer their goods and services in “dual currency” denominations, where customers could choose to pay in Federal Reserve Notes or gold and silver coins.
This kind of “bottom up” approach to ending the Fed will have a greater likelihood of success than the “top-down” approaches we’ve seen over the years for two major reasons:
1. The top-down approach has been an utter failure. While it has succeeded greatly in an educational role, it has simply not worked tactically.
2. It’s decentralized. Political opposition won’t be as strong or well-funded on a state level. Strategies and tactics can be adapted much quicker. And, most importantly, success in one state can be a far greater educational tool – and a source of courage – for people of a neighboring state, than endless calls to a Congress which almost never does what’s right.
Support Sound Money with a TAC Medallion!

BYE BYE

Greene tells us that use of sound money would drive further use.
He writes: “Over time, as residents of the State use both Federal Reserve Notes and silver and gold coins, the fact that the coins hold their value more than Federal Reserve Notes do, will lead to a “reverse Gresham’s Law” effect, where good money (gold and silver coins) will drive out bad money (Federal Reserve Notes). As this happens, a cascade of events can begin to occur, including the flow of real wealth toward the State’s treasury, an influx of banking business from outside of the State – as people in other States carry out their desire to bank with sound money – and an eventual outcry against the use of Federal Reserve Notes for any transactions.”
Once things get to that point, Federal Reserve notes would become largely unwanted and irrelevant for ordinary people.
Nullifying the Fed on a state by state level is what will get us there. Without a single act of Congress, the Federal Reserve system can be brought to its knees.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

Get the model legislation, the Constitutional Tender Act, HERE.
Read William Green’s full Scholar’s Conference paper HERE.
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA.
Follow him on twitter – @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.
If you enjoyed this post: Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,
Tenth Amendment Center
Related articles

Dinar RV Saturday ---- Bloomberg

DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR DINAR---DINAR---DINAR---DINAR


These financial guys from Bloomberg Financial tell you how the market will be rebalanced worldwide and how it will happen soon. They say that you will go to bed some Saturday night and wake up Sunday morning to a new financial evaluation for every currency in the world. They believe that this will happen soon.



Accountability

http://www.angelfire.com/space2/light11/fc/account1.html#barack1

I want to be reelected

An old West Virginia Hillbilly saying:

“You cannot get the water to clear up
until you get the pigs out of the creek.”

*SOME OF YOU MAY APPRECIATE THIS AND
SOME OF YOU MAY NOT.*

*I DO NOT APOLOGIZE FOR SENDING
THIS BECAUSE OF IT'S TRUTH.*


*If any other of our presidents had criticized
a state law that he admitted he never even read,
would you think that he is just an
ignorant hothead? *

*If any other of our presidents joined the
country of Mexico and sued a state in
the United States to force that state
to continue to allow illegal immigration,
would you question his patriotism
and wonder whose side he was on? *

*If any other of our presidents had pronounced
the Marine Corps like Marine Corpse,
would you think him an idiot? *

*If any other of our presidents had put 87,000
workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling
on companies that have one of the
best safety records of any industry
because one foreign company had an accident,
would you have agreed? *

*If any other of our presidents had used
a forged document
as the basis of the moratorium that would
render 87000 American workers
unemployed would you support him? *

*If any other of our presidents had been the
first President to need a Teleprompter
installed to be able to get through
a press conference, would you have
laughed and said this is more proof of how inept
he is on his own and is really controlled
by smarter men
behind the scenes? *

*If any other of our presidents had spent
hundreds of thousands of dollars
to take his First Lady to a play in NYC,
would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had reduced
your retirement plan holdings
of GM stock by 90% and given the
unions a majority stake in GM,
would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had made a joke
at the expense of the Special Olympics,
would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had given
Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive
and incorrectly formatted DVDs,
when Gordon Brown had given him
a thoughtful and historically significant gift,
would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had given
the Queen of England
an iPod containing videos of his speeches,
would you have thought it
a proud moment for America ? *

*If any other of our presidents had
bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia
would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had
visited Austria and made reference
to the nonexistent "Austrian language,"
would you have brushed it off
as a minor slip? *

*If any other of our presidents had filled his
cabinet and circle of advisers
with people who cannot seem to keep
current in their income taxes,
would you have approved? *

*If any other of our presidents had stated that
there were 57 states
in the United States , wouldn't you have
had second thoughts
about his capabilities? *

*If any other of our presidents would have
flown all the way to Denmark
to make a five minute speech about how the
Olympics would benefit him
walking out his front door in his home town,
would you not have thought he was a
self-important, conceited, egotistical jerk. *

*If any other of our presidents had been
so Spanish illiterate as to refer to
"Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador
when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo),
and continued to flub it when he tried again,
wouldn't you have winced in embarrassment? *
(This is what happen when he has NO TelePrompTer!)
*If any other of our presidents had burned
9,000 gallons of jet fuel
to go plant a single tree on Earth Day,
would you have concluded
he's a hypocrite?*

*If any other of our presidents'
administrations had okayed
Air Force One flying low over millions
of people followed by a jet fighter
in downtown Manhattan causing
widespread panic,
would you have wondered whether they
actually get what happened on 9-11? *

*If any other of our presidents had failed to
send relief aid to flood victims
throughout the Midwest with more people killed
or made homeless than in New Orleans,
would you want it made
into a major ongoing political issue with
claims of racism and incompetence? *

*If any other of our presidents had created
the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him,
bypassing the House and Senate
on much of what is happening in America ,
would you have ever approved? *
*If any other of our presidents had
ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation,
even though he had no constitutional authority to do so,
would you have approved? *

*So, tell me again,
what is it about Obama that makes
him so brilliant and impressive? *

*Can't think of anything?
Don't worry.
He's done all this in 34 months
so you don’t have that much time to
come up with an answer.*
*Every statement and action in this email is factual
and directly attributable to
Barrack Hussein Obama.
Every bumble is a matter of record
and completely verifiable. *
AND NOW--
HE ACTUALLY WANTS US TO RE-ELECT HIM.
WAKE UP AMERICA 2012 IS UPON US.
*I WONDER HOW MANY OF YOU
WILL FORWARD THIS ? *
I AM BECAUSE I CANNOT AFFORD TO
TAKE A CHANCE ON THIS GUY FOR
ANOTHER FOUR YEARS . . .
*"All it takes for evil to triumph
is..........
for good people to do nothing."*
 

Is it already too late? Excellent letter

  From: John  Porter
To: Americans  everywhere
 
I was sitting at my  keyboard halfway through my writing a letter to  you about how Barack Obama was fulfilling his  pledge to "Transform America" by "Changing the  fundamentals of America", so that our government  would become the plantation, he the owner, and  we the slaves, when this article by Steve McCann  appeared in my in box. After checking it for  accuracy, and finding it so, I put my writing on  hold and here present it to you, for I could not  say it better.
 
    
Obama's  Second Term Transformation Plans  

       

The 2012  election has often been described as the most  pivotal since 1860. This  statement is not  hyperbole. If Barack  Obama is re-elected the United States will never  be the same, nor will it be able to re-capture  its once lofty status as the most dominant  nation in the history of mankind.  

The  overwhelming majority of Americans do not  understand that Obama's first term was  dedicated to putting in place executive  power to enable him and the administration  to fulfill the campaign promise of "transforming  America " in his second term regardless of which  political party controls Congress. That is  why his re-election team is virtually ignoring  the plight of incumbent or prospective  Democratic Party office holders.  

The most significant  accomplishment of Obama's first term is to make  Congress irrelevant. Under the myopic and  blindly loyal leadership of Harry Reid and Nancy  Pelosi, the Democrats have succeeded in creating  an imperial and, in a second term, a potential  dictatorial presidency.  

During  the first two years of the Obama administration  when the Democrats overwhelming controlled both  Houses of Congres s and the media was in an Obama  worshipping stupor, a myriad of laws were  passed and actions taken which transferred  virtually unlimited power to the executive  branch 

The birth  of multi-thousand page laws was not an  aberration.This  tactic was adopted so the bureaucracy controlled  by Obama appointees would have sole discretion  in interpreting vaguely written laws and  enforcing thousands of pages of regulations they  and not Congress would subsequently  write.   

For example, in the 2,700 pages of  
ObamaCare  there are more than 2,500 references to the  Secretary of Health and Human  Services.There are  more than 700 instances when he or she is  instructed that they "shall" do something and  more than 200 times when they "may" take at  their sole discretion some form of regulatory  action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that  the "Secretary determines." In essence one  person, appointed by and reporting to the  president, will be in charge of the health care  of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully  operational in 2014. 

The  
same is  true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank  Financial Reform Act which  confers nearly unlimited power on various  agencies to control by fiat the nation's  financial, banking and investment sectors.  The bill  also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer  Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any  oversight by Congress.This  overall < span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: purple; font-size: 14pt; ">process  was repeated numerous times with other  legislation all with the intent of granting  unfettered power to the executive  branch  controlled Barack Obama and his radical  associates. 

Additionally, the Obama  administration has, through its unilaterally  determined rule making and regulatory powers,  created laws out of whole cloth. The  Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily  basis issues new regulations clearly out of  their purview in order to modify and change&n bsp; environmental laws previously passed and to  impose a radical green agenda never approved by  Congress. The same is true of the Energy and  Interior Departments among many others.   

None of  these extra-constitutional actions have been  challenged by Congress. The left in America   knows this usurpation of power is nearly  impossible to reverse unless stopped in its  early stages.  

It is clearly the mindset of this  administration and its appointees that Congress  is merely a nuisance and can be ignored after  they were able to take full advantage of the  useful idiots in the Democrat controlled House  and Senate in 2009-2010 and the Democrat Senate  in the current Congress.   

Additionally, Barack  Obama knows after his re-election a Republican  controlled House and Senate will not be able to  enact any legislation to roll back the power  previously granted to the Executive Branch or  usurped by them. His veto will not be overridden  as there will always be at least 145 Democratic  members of the House or 34 in the Senate in  agreement with or intimidated by an  administration more than willing to use Chicago   style political tact ics.  

The  stalemate between the Executive and Legislative  Branches will inure to the benefit of Barack  Obama and his fellow leftists. 

The  most significant power Congress has is the  control of the purse-strings
 as all  spending must be approved by them. However,  once  re-elected, Barack Obama, as  confirmed by his willingness to do or say  anything and his unscrupulous re-election  tactics, would not  only threaten government shutdowns but  would deliberately withhold payments to those  dependent on government support as a means of  intimidating and forcing a Republican controlled  Congress to surrender to his demands,  thus  neutering their ability to control the  administration through spending  constraints.  

Further,  this administration has shown contempt for the  courts by ignoring various court  orders, e.g. the  Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium,  as well  as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by  Congress. The Eric  Holder Justice Department has become the epitome  of corruption as part of the most dishonest and  deceitful administration in American history. In  a second term the arrogance of Barack Obama and  his minions will become more b latant as he will  not have to be concerned with re-election.   

Who will be there to enforce the  rule of law, a Supreme Court ruling or the  Constitution? No one. Barack Obama and his  fellow-travelers will be unchallenged as they  run roughshod over the American people.  

Many  Republicans and conservatives  dissatisfied with the prospect of Mitt Romney as  the nominee for president are instead  focused  on re-taking the House and Senate.  That  goal, while worthy and necessary, is meaningless  unless Barack Obama is defeated. The nation  is not dealing with a person of character and  integrity but someone of single-minded purpose  and overwhelming narcissism.Judging  by his actions, words and deeds during his first  term, he does not intend to work with  Congress either  Republican or Democrat in his second term  but  rather to force his radical agenda on the  American people through  the power he has usurped or been granted.  

The  governmental structure of the United States was  set up by the founders in the  hope that over the years only those people of  high moral character and integrity would assume  the reins of power. However, knowing that was  not always possible, they dispersed power over  three distinct and independent branches as a  check on each other. 

What they  could not imagine is the surrender and  abdication of its constitutional duty by the  preeminent governmental branch, the Congress, to  a chief executive devoid of  any character or integrity coupled with a  judiciary essentially powerless to enforce the  law when the chief executive ignores them  

Conservatives,  Libertarians, the Republican Party and Mitt  Romney must come to grips with this moment in  time and their historical role in denying Barack  Obama and his minions their ultimate goal. All  resources must be directed at that end-game and  not merely controlling Congress and the various  committee chairmanships.  

Steve  McCann 
May 12, 2012    

I would  add but 6 words to those above mentioned,  Conservatives, Libertarians, the Republican  Party and Mitt Romney, to say "and we the  American people also", must come to grips with  this moment in time and our role in denying  Barack Obama his life long goal of  "transforming" us into his slaves working on his  government plantation.

Please forward  this to all you can, maybe together we can save  America for ourselves and those who will follow  a fter us. 

May God bless America .