If this obamacare garbage is NOT re-pealed then GOD help us... obama is NOT for AMERICA...
Anyone who votes him for another term as far as I am concerned is NOT an American citizen...
It is time we take back American from those who are destroy it...
We Must Take America Back - Steve Vaus (a good friend of mine)
=================================================================================
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:24 PM
Subject: Fwd: SCARY!!!...READ!!!..Another Secret in Obamacare Law - RFID Chip Implants for All Americans
I would like to know where they think they will find somebody big enough to hold me down and put a chip in me? I will die as a citizen before I submit as a subject, WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!
Look what the STUPID people have done to our country so they can get a handout.
I'm Tom Jack, CONSTITUTONAL, CONSERVATIVE, PATRIOT, and I approve this message
To:
To:
This new law requires an RFID chip implanted in each one of us. This chip will not only contain your personal information with tracking capability, but it will also be linked to your bank account. And get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote: "Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment". It is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be linked to our bank accounts, as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it. In just a minute I’m going to show you the black and white of the law itself and you can see it with your own eyes and wonder why an event of this magnitude - which is nothing less than seismic in nature - is met with little more than silence in the Christian community. Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in Biblical prophecy? I’ll ask that question again in a minute and follow up on it, but first I want to show you the law itself. I’ve downloaded a PDF copy of HR3200 from the government's website so what I’m about to show you is from the bill itself; its nothing I’ve written. You can access it, and see it for yourself - straight from the source itself. H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1. The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.” What exactly is a class II device that is implantable? As you saw earlier, it is the device approved by the FDA in 2004. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuid... A class II implantable device is an "implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information." The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as "claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary." Going back to what we just looked at, the creation of the national medical device registry in section 2521, page 1002 line 5: “In developing the registry, the secretary shall…” And the law continues on with a laundry list of items that the secretary must do in the process of creating this registry. In this laundry list of items to do, Line 17, subparagraph B: "validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A)" Going back to subparagraph A [right above subparagraph B], it says: “including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;” Don’t be confused by the intentional obfuscation and skillful wording, This law first creates the national device registry and then immediately lists all the task the secretary of HHS will have do in the process of creating this registry. The very first two items in the list mandates that the secretary first gives a unique identification to each of the items listed in paragraph 1 which is: ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable.” Then, the very next thing the secretary is to do is to create the process by which “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, which is electronic medical records, that are linked to these newly and uniquely identified items from paragraph 1 which are the class III and class II implantable devices. Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers, heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is, as you saw from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which is, “for linking such data with the information included in the registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry is the name of a device. In plain English, we are clearly being told our electronic medical records are going to be linked to a class II implantable device! Continuing a few lines down in this same section, section B subsection ii on still on page 1002, the “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, that is to be linked is clearly spelled out as electronic medical records. It reads: “link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry”. Information in the registry is, as we know from subparagraph A, the name of the device. So what is the data obtained under clause i? Back up a few lines to clause i. It reads: “obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including Federal health-related electronic data”. Again, from breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B? That stated purpose is “for linking such data” and the such data is electronic medical records. What we have already seen in just the creation of this registry, is the device that will serve as the link, which is an RFID microchip that is categorized as a Class II implantable device, as well as what it will be the link for - which is your electronic medical records. In case the law wasn’t clear enough on that point, still in the laundry list of things for the Secretary of HHS to do a few more lines down on the next page, page 1005: “The Secretary to protect the public health, shall establish procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3, which is electronic medical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;” Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the Secretary of HHS is given full power to inact all mandates from the laundry list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry, as well as dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented. "The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device." Now on Page 503, section E, Lines 13-17 and I quote: "encourage, as appropriate, the development and use of clinical registries and the development of clinical effectiveness research data networks from electronic health records, post marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts". Let me say that again, medical device surveillance efforts! Now lets look at section 163 of HR3200, which gives the government a direct electronic access to your bank account which will work in conjunction with an implanted chip. Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads: (D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of claims. What does this mean? It means that the government will give everybody a health ID card that contains a machine readable device (magnetic strip or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in this chip or strip is your Health Identification Number. When you visit a medical provider, the medical claims will be processed while you are still in the office. The medical providers will be paid in real time. The portion that you owe will be deducted from your bank account, in real time, according to HR 3200. Notice here in this part which is at the beginning of 2000 plus pages of the law, it is carefully worded “which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card”. Here we are told that it may be a card. As you have already seen, deeper in the law [Sec. 2521 Pg. 1000] what this “may” utilize is clearly spelled out as a “class II device that is implantable”. We can only speculate at this point why the law is set up this way. Most likely this section was written to account for the gap in time from when the process of chipping begins to when everyone has received a chip. A means of starting with a card for the sake of expedience while the process of chipping citizenry plays out. One thing is certain, the law mandates that within 3 years we will all have a chip under our skin that will serve this purpose. Evidence of this logic is found in the deadline set for the start of the registry on page 1006. "EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date." Also on page 259, this law requires the use of Electronic medical records system in all hospitals by 2012 which will leave a gap of at least a year before the class II implantable device is required. Republican Congressman Ron Paul from Texas, states on his website: "Buried deep within the over 1,000 pages of the massive US Health Care Bill (PDF) in a “non-discussed” section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry, and which states its purpose as........ He quotes that part of the law and then goes on to say: "In “real world speak”, according to this report, this new law, when fully implemented, provides the framework for making the United States the first Nation in the World to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio- frequency identification microchip for the purpose of controlling who is, or isn’t, allowed medical care in their country". That is from a currently serving member of congress. Cutting through all the politicalese, the bottom line is that eventually, if you want to participate in a government healthcare plan, you will have to have this chip implanted in you. This law mandates that you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law guarantees that all private healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system and it is mandatory that you be a part of this system. See above webcast for video When I have a number of different pieces of data, I like to lay it all out in bit size pieces so the picture becomes clearer so I’m going to lay out the data and cut through the political circular logic and legal ease: 2004: Class II implantable devices receive FDA approval and verachip VeriMed electronic health records system also received approval from the FDA. 2009: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act authorized $23 billion in stimulus funds for health care information technology. In conjunction with that, VeriChip re-launches VeriMed electronic health records system which is a system that is made up of implantable RFID microchips, handheld scanners for emergency room personnel to read these chips, and online electronic personal health records. 2010: HR3200 was passed by the House and signed into law by the president Now looking at the new law, Page 259 Electronic Medical Records system will be required for all healthcare providers by 2012. Pages 1001-1002: A national medical device registry is created and populated with devices. Chiefly noted among them, a Class II medical device that is implantable. Pages 1002-1004: Mandates the use of class II implantable devices to serve as the link between you and your electronic medical records. Page 1005: The secretary of human services will establish the procedures for the linking of the Class II implantable device and electronic medical records. Page 1007: Secretary of health and human services is given full power to inact all items required in the creation of the registry as well as the power to dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented. Page 503: Medical device surveillance is authorized. Page 58: The link to your electronic medical records which is the Class II implantable device will also be linked to your bank account. Page 1006: Without regard to whether or not final regulations are in place, you will be required to get a Class II implantable device linked to your medical records and bank account in order to participate in the government healthcare plan. Pages 155-158: It is mandated that you have health insurance or you will pay $100.00 dollars per day that you are not covered. Page 159: The IRS will enforce healthcare enrollment and fines for not carrying health insurance. Lastly: This law mandates that you have to have insurance and by virtue of this law, guarantees that all private healthcare insurers will be driven out of business with only the government option left. We will be in a single payer system and you will have to have an imbedded chip to be a member of this system, and it is mandatory that you be a part of this system. the United States the first nation in the world to require each and every one of its citizens to have implanted in them a radio-frequency identification microchip. In theory, the intent to streamline healthcare and to eliminate fraud via "health chips" seems right. But, to have the world's lone superpower mandate a device to be IMPLANTED is not just scary. It is prophetic! Is this in its current form the mark of the beast? The Bible is clear that this will not become the mark of the beast until midway through tribulation when it is somehow associated with a sign of allegiance to the antichrist and it is in someway imprinted with a number or symbols associated 666. However this is the very mechanism by which it will happen and obviously since the mark will be on a global scale, this has not fully played out. Keep in mind though, we are already staring down the barrel of a global government who will implement this on a global scale. Now I’m going to ask you the question that I asked earlier: Is it now starting to dawn on you just where exactly we are in prophecy? By virtue of the fact that this hasn’t sent tremors through the Christian community, one can only assume that community is asleep at the wheel. Maybe everyone is so bogged down in all the other evil facets to this new law that this has slipped through the cracks. I tend to doubt that is the case though. I think the reason that hardly no one has seemed to even so much as mentioned this is because human nature is kicking in and it’s hard to get past the logical mind when it is telling you that this just can’t be or this is somehow a misrepresentation of the new law and all those who had a part in it. Mixed in with that, no one wants to risk their reputation or for some their ministries reputation by saying something that could get them labeled as conspiracy nut. Captain Edward Smith, captain of the Titanic said this shortly before the Titanic embarked on its maiden voyage: “I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder. I cannot conceive of any vital disaster happening to this vessel. Modern shipbuilding has gone beyond that.” See above webcast for video All that you have seen so far is a matter of fact and easily investigated by yourself. Romans 13:11 And do this, understanding the present time. The hour has come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed. Replies to This Discussion §  Reply § Permalink Reply by Linda Diana Kovacs on February 1, 2011 at 10:33pm YES Bob, Rapture IS PRE-TRIB.!!! God bless you! "Wherefore comfort one another with these words." 1 Thess.4:18 § Reply § Permalink Reply by Donna M Harmon on May 31, 2011 at 7:56pm I agree with you totally Bob. camps, that's scary. I'm with you. I think we'll be raptured before that happens and we won't have to worry about which bunk we get. we have a mansion in heaven that Jesus is preparing for us. there are a lot of people who believe we'll be here for the tribulation. they say the rapture isn't biblical. but these same people say Jesus was nailed through His wrists and ankles. I'm sorry but the bible says "hands and feet" so as far as I'm concerned, that isn't biblical either. I have read and studied end times prophecies and I believe that WE WILL BE RAPTURED before the worst hits. amen? but I am no big bible scholar either. § Reply § Permalink Reply by David Robert on June 3, 2011 at 8:07am "I hope that the Rapture is a pre-trib event." Bob, that is wishful thinking, however I have to disagree with the strong sentiment expressed by Linda: "YES Bob, Rapture IS PRE-TRIB.!!!" and possibly Donna: "WE WILL BE RAPTURED before the worst hits". By the worst, does Donna mean being faced with accepting or rejecting the mark of the beast? Pre-Trib rapture teaches that we will not be faced with this decision because we won't be here. You said, "I am not going to argue with anyone about it because it doesn't matter that much to me." It should matter to you because relying on a "PRE-TRIB" event to spare you from much of what is coming could cause you to be in the wrong group symbolized by the parable of the ten virgins found in Matthew 25. Try not to be caught low on oil, brother, by putting on the full armor of God so that you will be able to resist in the evil day! "Stand firm therefore, HAVING GIRDED YOUR LOINS WITH TRUTH" Ephesians 6:14 The truth of whether or not it is pre, mid, or post should matter if you wish to be adequately girded and have enough oil to make it in. If our preps are sufficient Revelation 13:17 "no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark" won't be near as stressful compared to those who have no preps because they were counting on being pre-trib raptured out of here and can now only feed themselves and their family by accepting the mark. Don't take my word for it, be adequately studied up not relying on mere conjecture and speculation (which pre-trib rapture teaching is) wrongly shared as truth by others. Those who endure to the end will be saved! Matthew 24:13 Don't be caught short. I'm brand new at Patriot Action Network, however looking at your profile it appears you are doing a good work here. Thanks. § Reply § Permalink Reply by MomOf3 on June 3, 2011 at 6:01pm I know people are on all sides: No rapture, Pre-trib, Mid-trib, Post-trib. The way I read it we will be caught up with Jesus at the end and fight the battle of Armageddon, making it at the end of tribulation. I feel that if all the believers are raptured at the beginning who will be here for those many that will come to know the Lord? But no matter what your opinion is I think it is prudent to watch the news from a Biblical perspective. I hope the pre-tribers are correct but we should be prepared in case it is not until the end. § Reply § Permalink Reply by Jonathan Richard on June 16, 2011 at 10:02am I think you need to re-read Revelation 19 if you think that's the way it reads. In Revelation 19, the SAINTS are the ones coming back WITH Christ to war with the WORLD. If we are still in the world, we are part of the forces FIGHTING Christ not fighting WITH Christ. No, the rapture HAS to take place before that last battle. § Reply § Permalink Reply by Jonathan Richard on June 16, 2011 at 10:03am I think "watching" for the pre-trib rapture IS what the 10 virgins parable was about. 5 were READY for Christ to take them... the other 5 were NOT ready and weren't watching for the rapture. Hence they were left outside.... Pre-Trib rapture = truth. § Reply § Permalink Reply by David Robert on June 16, 2011 at 12:23pm Jonathan, 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 mentions: "For this we say to you by the word of the Lord..." Isn't the Lord's word referenced here found in Matthew 24:31? Or do you know another place where the word of the Lord mentions what is described in 1 Thess 4. In Matthew 24:13 Jesus said, "But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved." Does Matthew 24:13 and the events mentioned just before apply to those who will be "pre-trib" raptured out of here? Or will they be gone before this? § Reply § Permalink Reply by Jonathan Richard on June 16, 2011 at 12:35pm There are plenty of "types" of the rapture that show the Lord will not force us to go through this. Do you not think that those who endures to the end, meaning to the end of their life, will be saved? http://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/444/ go read, educate yourself my brother. § Reply § Permalink Reply by David Robert on June 16, 2011 at 2:25pm In late 1982 or early 1983 I sat in a Jimmy Swaggart service in Baton Rouge where Rev. Swaggart had one of his men begin his sermon by reading Matthew 24:1 thru 13 or 14. After the man finished reading Rev. Swaggart got up and said, "You see this! What was just read? Well that's not us, because we are not going to be here! We are going to be raptured out of here." The crowd erupted in applause. You asked, "Do you not think that those who endures to the end, meaning to the end of their life, will be saved?" I believe that my question to you and the Matthew 24:13 endure to the end scripture in context is directly related to the scriptures immediately preceding it: "Then they will deliver you to tribulation, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations because of My name. At that time many will fall away and will betray one another and hate one another. Many false prophets will arise and will mislead many. Because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold. But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved." e.g. many will fall away and will betray one another. . . all because of the events Jesus spoke of in the beginning of Matthew 24. This is where the admonition of enduring to the end is most apropos regarding the question I asked you, not just "meaning to the end of their life". So I ask my question again, do you believe as Rev. Swaggart and other "pre-trib" rapture proponents believe that Matthew 24:4-13 does not apply to those who will be "pre-trib" raptured out of here? Thanks for the link, but all of my study shows me that a belief in a "pre-trib" rapture can only be arrived at from one's own conjecture and speculation or allowing someone else to mislead them into believing it because they have failed to do as the Bereans (Acts 17:11) did, and search the scriptures for themselves to confirm whether or not the things they were mislead to believe are actually so or not. Rather than give me a link to someone else's expositions, I'm willing to listen to your personal views and scriptures you think support your belief of a "pre-trib" rapture. As far as the Lord not forcing us to go through this; I trust my Lord enough to be with me as He was with Shadrach Meshach and Abednego in the furnace of fire. As He was with Daniel in the lions den. I trust the promise of Psalm 91:7 "A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you". I believe God can do all of this, if He wills, without "pre-trib" rapturing me out of here. Should He will that I be counted with those spoken of in Revelation 6:11, then so be it. And, I take serious the admonition of Ephesians 6:13 as well as Matthew 24:13 which all help us to ensure that we have plenty of oil for our lamps. I do not believe teaching "pre-trib" rapture prepares those who buy into the teaching to be able to resist in the evil day. Therefore they will be caught short and find a lack of oil in their lamps. I'm willing to consider any scriptures (not other peoples web links) that you have to present which you feel proves that there is a "pre-trib" rapture as long as you are willing to honestly consider my refutation of why they miss the mark failing to be more than just wishful thinking, conjecture, and speculation. Yes my brother, study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth and increasing your chances to endure to the end by being able to resist in the evil day. § Reply § Permalink Reply by Jonathan Richard on June 16, 2011 at 2:54pm ROFL I'm busy right now, you just showed you aren't a berean and just want to "win" an argument since you reject a link from a BIBLE TEACHER who has a PhD in Biblical studies and teaches the best bible school you will ever see. You aren't a berean at all. § Reply § |
