MILITARY INSIDER:
President Obama – “By Any Means Necessary”
For the first time in over two years
of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider
allows for direct interview participation
of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”. What follows is the
first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending
manufactured crisis within the United States by
powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself
Obama”. For those who have followed these insider interviews from
the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be. Please
remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.
PART ONE:
UM:
Can we begin?
WSI:
(Broad smile) Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very
nice to see you again in person.
UM:
I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better. Out of the woods?
WSI:
No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will. But at this
point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet! (laughs)
UM:
Why did you decide to invite him here? I’m glad – honored, to have them
here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?
WSI:
Certainly. I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here
for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells
them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first
person. I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when
possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own
interpretations.
UM:
How long have you known each other?
WSI:
(Looks over at MI) That would be…nearly twenty years? Perhaps a bit
more?
MI:
Twenty three years.
WSI:
That long? Really?
MI:
Just over twenty-three years. That’s correct.
UM:
Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?
MI:
No.
WSI:
I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago. Shortly after the
election…in 2008. Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a
terrible mistake made. That Obama being elected had been a terrible
mistake. Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that
was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new
president.
UM:
Can you expand on that? Those concerns. What were they?
WSI:
You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path. A number of times.
UM:
I’d like to hear it from him. If that’s ok. Their
perspective. Unfiltered. Like you just said you wanted.
(Military Insider looks at WSI)
WSI:
If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine. But I would
caution there is agreat deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own
efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was. I
would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some
hope is to be.
UM:
We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those
concerns that pushed us to this point, right? So if you’re comfortable
with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those
concerns back then. After 2008. Or before 2008 if there were
concerns before then.
MI:
There were.
UM:
Concerns? Before 2008? About Obama?
MI:
Yes.
UM:
What were they?
MI:
The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against
the military. That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off –
or most of us. At least those of us not put in place by the
communists. The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.
UM:
Did you just say communists? In the U.S. military?
MI:
Yes.
UM:
Please – can you please explain that.
MI:
Communists. Communist supporters. Sympathizers. Or
socialists. Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term.
Big government…One World…that whole concept. It’s real. As real
these chairs. That wall. The air in your
lungs.
UM:
Agenda 21? That conspiracy theory? And the United States military?
MI:
Yes – not a conspiracy. It’s real. It exists. And it’s
happening right now.
UM:
Agenda 21 is non-binding.
MI:
That is…not accurate.
UM:
No – it’s a non-binding agreement. It’s…it was more a show than anything
of substance.
MI:
No sir. You are wrong. Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was
the intended outcome of calling it that.
UM:
What?
MI: Non-binding. Voluntary.
UM:
But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the
environmentalists.
MI:
It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted
within that document choose to act on that authority.
UM:
What?
MI:
That document was a blueprint. Have you actually read it?
UM:
Not…not all of it. No.
MI:
Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?
UM:
I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists
running theUnited States military.
MI:
That’s not what I said.
UM:
You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.
MI: No.
UM:
Ok…you explain to me what you just said. About the communists, the
globalists…all of that. What did you say?
MI:
You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama? Before the 2008
election.
UM:
Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in
place by the communists. That’s what you said. Right?
MI:
Yes.
UM:
So – what’s the problem?
MI:
What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military. You said that.
Not me.
UM:
What’s the difference?
MI:
Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military.
They are not running the U.S. military. That is a distinction of epic
proportions. You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world
– all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.
WSI:
And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s
been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time. It’s been happening
right under our noses.
UM:
It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?
MI:
Incorrect.
UM:
What?
MI:
Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era. It was developed long
before that. In fact, it culminated under President Bush. HW.
WSI:
But it goes back much farther than that. I only learned of this more
recently myself.
MI: Yes sir – much farther. Decades of
planning. A multiple series of five year plans.
UM:
Five year plans?
WSI:
Just like Stalin. A slow progression…a creeping monster that
comes in five year increments. Cutting away at freedom and liberty and
individuality.
MI:
Yes sir. Just like that.
UM:
So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?
MI:
You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to
ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.
UM:
Fair enough – I apologize for that.
MI:
Accepted.
WSI:
He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were. Please – continue.
MI:
Yes sir.
(Pause)
Decades ago. The first official mark goes back to the
early 1970’s. The birth of the modern environmental movement. Are
you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most
important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism
became the fixture of
a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.
Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have
been members of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood
the implications. These people are not conspiracy nuts. These
people are patriots who understand the threat. The country –
theUnited States, is under siege. It has been going on for a
long time. Decades of planning. And now the planning stage is being
transitioned into the implementation stage. Right now. It’s
happening now.
WSI:
And you are absolutely convinced of that? It’s happening now – the
election of Barack Obama was the signal? Implementation of this
globalization plan commenced at that time? Fully
commenced? Right?
MI:
Yes sir.
UM:
How? (Pause) The…implementation? How does that work. By
force? Using our own military against us?
MI:
No. That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are
good men and women. They signed up. They took an oath. And
they are doing their job. Remember, I indicated some inside the
military were part of this globalization movement. Not all. Not
most. But some.
UM:
But some of these inside the military – they have influence?
MI:
Yes. Appointed to positions of authority. By this administration.
UM:
The Secretary of State? Panetta? I thought he was the real hero of
the Bin Laden raid?
MI:
He acted outside his direct authority. That action had little to nothing
to do with the best interests of the United States.
UM:
What do you mean?
MI: (Looks toward WSI)
UM:
(Repeats question) What do you mean?
WSI:
What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations
were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting
to. The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name
deleted-. It means nothing to me. Nothing.
UM: So you
don’t trust him?
WSI:
No – I do not. I’ve never trusted any of them.
UM:
Who?
WSI: Politicians.
That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election. I find them all
distasteful to some degree. Even the best of them.
UM:
But you’re voting this time – in 2012.
WSI:
That’s correct. While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man
calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.
UM:
And what’s that?
WSI:
Dangerous.
UM:
So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole
globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without
coming off…without sounding…
WSI:
Crazy?
UM:
Yeah – crazy.
WSI: That’s how it’s intended. Do that
which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into
submission while continuing on with your work. Call it outlandish, crazy,
ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they
accuse of.
These Obama people are quite good at that.
UM:
So the globalization thing…the plan…Agenda 21…it’s not just a Democrat thing?
MI:
Correct.
UM:
Republicans have gone along with it too?
MI:
Correct. Let me clarify that a bit. If that’s ok?
UM:
Please do.
MI:
The architects are embedded within the various liberal sub groups, all of which
are under the umbrella of today’s Democratic Party. They have been the
ones to push this agenda – THE AGENDA…for the past several
decades. There are Republicans…there have been Republicans, sympathetic
to the superficial aspects of the plan.
(Long pause)
UM:
You lost me. I get the liberal groups…I will assume the unions, the environmental
groups…they are all in on the globalization plan. I get that. What do you
mean by the superficial aspects of the plan? The…that part of it that
attracts some Republicans?
WSI:
If I may?
MI:
Yes sir.
WSI:
This is where the big money comes into play. Take for example, General
Electric. A huge corporation with multiple subsidiaries…it is itself, a
working, breathing, functioning, ever-evolving manifestation of this
globalization movement. Massive amounts of dollars are spent developing
public relations campaigns that infest the very fabric of the public
conscience. Movies, television, music, fashion, consumable goods…it all becomes
part of the implementation plan. Global cooling becomes global warming
becomes climate change becomes sustainable resources…each of those are reading
from the very same script.
And so as these concepts grow in popularity among the
public…politicians bend their own vision to those concepts. They may do
so not knowing of course the true motivations of those who have invented said
concepts, but nevertheless, they become tools of the plan. They become
that all-important “bi-partisan” support of those plans.
UM: So what’s the purpose of all of
it? The plan? Globalization? Why? What’s the end goal?
WSI:
First, and for us at this very moment, most important – is the total and
irreversible transformation of the United States. If that is achieved –
as the man calling himself Obama and all those who support him and have placed
him in the White House…if that is achieved, then we are looking at a true
one-world government ruled by a small group of elite who will control all
aspects of production, dissemination of resources, how you are born, how you
live, and how and when you are to die. There is a group who believes they
will have a seat at that table of power – Big Labor, particular globalized
financial institutions, certain business entities, they all share in a belief
that the individual is simply too dumb, too un-evolved, to have to suffer through
life on their own. They want to be told what to do. What to
think. How to live.
UM:
(turning to MI) Do you agree with that – it’s really that
far-reaching? That’s where President Obama wants to take America?
Take the world?
MI:
Yes. I know it.
UM:
How?
MI:
(Looks to WSI)
WSI:
Go ahead.
MI:
Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information
pertaining to an election contingency plan. For 2012. After the
2010 elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama
administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need
to secure a second term for President Obama. That document’s title
was…(pauses)
WSI:
He can be trusted – I give you my word. Please proceed.
MI:
That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”. It was unofficial –
but we know it came directly from channels specific to the
administration. We confirmed that.
UM:
What channels? Who are you talking about?
MI:
We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein. Reviewed and
approved by Valerie Jarrett. Preparations for implementation are being
done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials
within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S. military.
UM:
Leo Gerard? The union leader? How would he play a part in this?
WSI:
Mr. Gerard has direct experience in toppling a government working directly with
similar forces that would be in play here in the United States. You did
some work on that…perhaps look more closely at what exactly happened in
Brazil. It was a coup. An overthrow of government. A joint
effort between Big Labor and certain business groups in which law enforcement
helped facilitate the final push.
Brazil was a regime change orchestrated by Leo Gerard and soon
after personally and financially congratulated by the President of the
United States.
What is now being planned for the United States is not regime
change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling
himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America
that can only be assured by a second presidential term.
That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been
titled, is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.
PART TWO OF THIS INTERVIEW COMING
SOON.
