Schneiderman Files Suit Against JP Morgan Chase for "Multiple Fraudulent and Dec

From: vkdurhamceo@frontier.com
To: somam@prodigy.net, avaaz@avaaz.org
CC: unwantedpublicity@gmail.com, TomFlocco@cs.com, siebenthal@gmail.com, m.saba@email.it, benjaminfulford@hotmail.com, apfn@apfn.org
Sent: 10/3/2012 5:13:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: Schneiderman Files Suit Against JP Morgan Chase for "Multiple Fraudulent and Deceptive Acts"

 

Schneiderman Files Suit Against JP Morgan Chase for "Multiple Fraudulent and Deceptive Acts"

Wednesday, 03 October 2012 10:09

By Sarah Jaffe, AlterNet | News

It's been a constant refrain over the last four years: no bankers charged with a crime, no real consequences at all for the villains of the economic crisis. Profits and bonuses are back to pre-crash heights (or even higher) while the rest of the country still struggles, and there's been no accountability.
Well, yesterday New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase and subsidiaries Bear Stearns and EMC Mortgage Corporation in a New York court, claiming that the bank "committed multiple fraudulent and deceptive acts in promoting and selling its Residential Mortgage Backed Securities", the financial instruments that caused the crash in the first place. (In 2008, with the help of a $29 billion loan from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, JP Morgan purchased Bear Stearns as it teetered on the brink of collapse.) "At the heart of Defendants' fraud was their failure to abide by their representations that they took a variety of steps to ensure the quality of the loans underlying their RMBS", the suit reads, "including checking to confirm that those loans were originated in accordance with the applicable underwriting guidelines, i.e., the standards in place to ensure, among other things, that loans were extended to borrowers who demonstrated the willingness and ability to repay".
All well and good. But what took so long? As FireDogLake's David Dayen noted, this information has been around for years:
But most of the evidence and legal theories in the case come from investigations and suits going back several years, and there's no reason it couldn't have been filed at that time. As the relevant statute of limitations under New York's Martin Act (which has a lower burden of proof, as it does not require demonstrating intent to defraud, only that the fraud occurred) is six years, this will only encompass fraud from late 2006 and 2007, the last vestiges of the housing bubble.
Homeowners, of course, have been waiting years for someone to file charges. Jean Sassine, a homeowner and chair of the Queens chapter of New York Communities for Change, said, "As a homeowner who has been fighting for a permanent modification from Chase for almost five years, I am glad -- but unfortunately not surprised -- about the news that Attorney General Schneiderman has decided to punish my servicer. It is about time someone has pointed out Chase's unwillingness to stop the damage their policies have done, which has only been multiplied by their unwillingness to modify loans like mine".
Dayen notes as well that if Schneidermans' goal was to get "more relief for homeowners", a suit like this one, alleging that investors were defrauded, seems like the wrong way to go about it. Investors are probably not in danger of losing their homes. Sassine and some 17 million underwater homeowners across the country are—and most of them are underwater because their homes lost value when the housing bubble, inflated by investors' purchases of securitized mortgages on the secondary market, burst.
The federal task force, unveiled with much fanfare by President Obama in the State of the Union address, remains understaffed and underfunded, and though it'll get credit for Schneidermans' move here, there's no federal suit to go along with the litigation in New York. Dayen writes, "[M]ore than anything, the lack of federal participation in the suit shows that the federal agencies involved in the task force are simply disinterested in prosecution, forcing Schneiderman to cobble together an off-the-shelf suit from other sources to make it look like this move against the banks represents anything real".
Was this a declaration of independence by Schneiderman, formerly the best hope of many progressives in New York and around the country, then? The timing does seem a little too perfect—right before the presidential election—but the target is the world's largest bank (though no individual bankers have been named and no criminal charges filed, leaving dreams of perp-walking CEO Jamie Dimon down Wall Street unfulfilled). The confusion over whether the task force really had anything to do with this could also be political—setting them up to take credit if the suit is successful and popular, and to blame it all on Schneiderman if it fails.
Greg Basta, Deputy Director of New York Communities for Change, hopes that other politicians will learn from Schneidermans' move. "The suit against Chase is a major first step, and we commend AG Schneiderman for taking that step and recognizing the major role that Chase has played in destabilizing the economy and destroying the dreams of millions of families", he tells AlterNet. "We hope that Mayor Bloomberg recognizes Chase's wrong-doings and stops investing our tax dollars in an institution that is committing widespread fraud".
But Matt Browner Hamlin of Occupy Our Homes notes that this suit doesn't represent much of an escalation from the lawsuits the banks have already faced from investors and other banks:
There may well exist a parallel universe where a series of large civil suits by state attorneys general, the federal government, and private investors were able to extract enough of a cash penalty from the banks which fraudulently inflated the housing bubble and subsequently stole millions of families homes to ensure that these banks would never, ever consider doing these things again. But that's not the universe we exist in. The lawsuits we have seen are small and sporadic, the settlement figures amounting to little more than the cost of doing business, while robosigning and foreclosure fraud occur to this day.
The best hope for this lawsuit is that it is a first step, that there are more coming and perhaps criminal charges too, and that the damages sought (unclear at this moment) will actually be significant enough to help the homeowners who are the real victims of this mess.
Dan Cantor, Executive Director of the Working Families Party (which helped Schneiderman win his post as Attorney General), says, "For four years, working families have had to pay the price for a collapse brought on by Wall Street fraud, deception and greed. We're grateful that Attorney General Scheiderman is working to hold the big banks accountable and make sure bad behavior is punished, not repeated".
And homeowner Sassine says, "I am hopeful that any damages collected, will go to helping the homeowners still hurting and fighting on Main Street and not to once again bailing out Wall Street".

http://truth-out.org/news/item/11903-schneiderman-files-suit-against-jp-morgan-chase-for-multiple-fraudulent-and-deceptive-acts

FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

WARNING FROM POLICE

WARNING FROM POLICE

This is the new thing these days with people out of work and needing cash. Beware, it's headed our way.

Just last weekend on Friday night we parked in a public parking area. As we drove away I noticed a sticker on the rear window of the car. When I took it off after I got home, it was a receipt for gas.. Luckily my friend told me not to stop as it could be someone waiting for me to get out of the car.. Then we received this email yesterday:

WARNING FROM POLICE

THIS APPLIES TO BOTH WOMEN AND MEN

BEWARE OF PAPER ON THE BACK WINDOW OF YOUR VEHICLE--NEW WAY TO DO CARJACKINGS (NOT A JOKE)

Heads up everyone! Please, keep this circulating.... You walk across the parking lot, unlock your car and get inside. You start the engine and shift into in reverse.

When you look into the rearview mirror to back out of your parking space, you notice a piece of paper stuck to the middle of the rear window. So, you shift into Park, unlock your doors, and jump out of your car to remove that paper (or whatever it is) that is obstructing your view. When you reach the back of your car, that is when the carjackers appear out of nowhere, jump into your car and take off. They practically mow you down as they speed off in your car.

And guess what, ladies?

I値l bet your purse is still in the car.

So now the carjacker has your car, your home address, your money, and your keys. Your home and your whole identity are now compromised!

BEWARE OF THIS NEW SCHEME THAT IS NOW BEING USED.
If you see a piece of paper stuck to your back window, just drive away. Remove the paper later. And be thankful that you read this e-mail. I hope you will forward this to friends and family, especially to women. A purse contains all kinds of personal information and identification documents, and you certainly do NOT want this to fall into the wrong hands.

Please keep this going and tell all your family and friends

LETTERMAN CALLS OUT OBAMA FOR LYING!

LETTERMAN CALLS OUT OBAMA FOR LYING! It appears that even some of the Leftist talk show hosts are finally seeing Barack Obama for what he really is - a liar. In his live broadcast this week, staunch Democrat, and heretofore Obama supporter, David Letterman called out Obama for lying during the final Presidential debate. HELP US. DONATE NOW SO WE CAN FIRE OBAMA! - SELECT HERE According to Letterman, he wanted to believe that Obama was telling the truth about Romney's Op-Ed regarding Bankrupting Detroit. But Letterman did what apparently few other media personalities do these days...he checked the facts. And it turns out, Letterman didn't like what he found - that Barack Obama, NOT Mitt Romney, was lying. HELP US. DONATE NOW SO WE CAN FIRE OBAMA! - SELECT HERE "Now, I don't care whether you're Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged" said Letterman. The shock on the face of Letterman's guest, ultra-liberal Rachel Maddow, was palpable. HELP US. DONATE NOW SO WE CAN FIRE OBAMA! - SELECT HERE If David Letterman is finally seeing the truth, then we have HOPE. But we MUST keep pushing hard. We must keep spreading the word. Barack Obama's campaign has a new $15 million Bank of America loan to finish funding his quest for victory. We don't have that kind of cash. And we won't take a loan. Instead, we have to rely on YOU, our donors, to help us spread the word and SAVE AMERICA. HELP US. DONATE NOW SO WE CAN FIRE OBAMA! - SELECT HERE Defend America, Alan M. Gottlieb Chairman, AmeriPAC If you prefer to send a check, please mail to: American Political Action Committee (AmeriPAC) PO Box 1682 Dept Code 6811 Bellevue, WA 98009-1682 Paid for by AmeriPAC, a federally-authorized and qualified multi candidate political action committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Contributions to AmeriPAC will be used in connection with federal elections. Maximum contribution per individual per calendar year is $5,000. Contributions from foreign nationals and corporations are prohibited. Contributions are not deductible for federal income tax purposes. Copyright © 2012 AmeriPAC, All Rights Reserved.

State Department warns Texas AG not to arrest UN-affiliated election observers

State Department warns Texas AG not to arrest UN-affiliated election observers

By Doug Powers • October 27, 2012 08:11 AM

**Written by Doug Powers
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has warned a group of UN-affiliated “international election observers” that they could be subject to criminal prosecution if they breach state laws by being within 100 feet of polling place entrances.
The US State Department issued a warning as well. No, not to the election observers — to Texas:

International election observers planning to visit Texas polling places have “full immunity” from being arrested in the United States, the State Department said when discussing a letter from the Texas Attorney General.
“I’m not going to get into any kind of hypothetical situations or predict where this is going to go other than to say we have every expectation that this will be worked out and to state the fact, which is that under U.S. law they are eligible for immunities,” said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. Reporters tried to get her to state explicitly that Texas could not arrest election observers from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), but Nuland would only reiterate that OSCE observers have full immunity.

Hey, it’s not like the State Department has anything else to worry about.
The “observers” will in part be looking for voter fraud and suppression activities by conservative groups. They’re only monitoring conservatives because nobody on the other side of the political spectrum has been busted in a voter fraud scam since, oh… Wednesday.
A list of where the observers will be stationed is here. Because this group is affiliated with the UN, the comptrollers of those listed cities would be wise to prepare to have unpaid parking tickets on the ledger until the end of time.

**Written by Doug Powers

             Hello All:
                      The truth is coming out. We now know what we were told was law is only LIES.
                                        God Bless  Love to All   

             

Breaking news IRS and the fed found un-costitutional

• Posted by latinoindigo2012 on October 27, 2012 at 4:06am in Spirituality In General
• View Discussions

There Was No Quorum In The Creating The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and The Income Tax Reforms Act

http://nesaranews.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/the-government-has-now-co...

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOW CONCEDED THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE OF THE INVALIDITY OF TITLE 18!!

The foundation argument made is based on "no Constitutional" passage due to a lack of a quorum. There was no quorum in the creating the Federal Reserve act of 1913 either and the Income Tax Reforms Act, created the IRS, was never ratified. The following is the crack in the dam of the US corporation. This argument is valid in many other areas of unconstitutionality.


THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOW CONCEDED THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE OF THE INVALIDITY OF TITLE 18!!

UPDATE ON TITLE 18 CLASS ACTION

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2012

September 27, 2012

A Motion for Summary Judgment was docketed by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Court, requesting immediate relief for anyone on the petition.

The Motion is based on the un-refuted affidavits and proof that no Constitutional passage occurred for Title 18, the criminal code in the 80th Congress (1947-1948).

Since the Title also includes the only authorization to allow federal courts jurisdiction in any criminal case, whether Title 18, Title 21, or Title 26, 18 USC section 3231, then the motion requests relief for each person on the petition.

You have a limited amount of time to get on the petition.


Contact us immediately!

In a challenge to the Validity of Title 18 (Public Law 80-772), the government has now admitted that Public Law 80-772 is unconstitutional. These admissions can be used in the Class Action on Title 18 and in other federal criminal cases.

The original class action petition was filed in the DC court on 2/23/2012. The judge refused to rule on the merits or make findings of fact and conclusions of law and now it is on appeal. An opening brief, a reply brief, and a Motion for Summary Judgment have been filed by our group. The government has waived argument on the issues presented.

A verified request for proof of claim was filed in a separate case on August 27, 2012 by our group. 18 stipulated answers were provided, to which the government waived argument on all stipulations, thus admitting the stipulations.

Included in those admissions were that “no quorum existed on May 12, 1947 and June 22 and 23, 1948”, rendering 18 USC section 3231, which is the only statute which gives the district court jurisdiction to prosecute any federal crime, invalid.

The government also admitted that the quorum issue has never been heard on the merits; that no Supreme Court precedent exists for the government; and that the US attorney is violating the law by prosecuting any crime.

The government also admitted that no prior statute gives the federal courts jurisdiction; that the indictment is void on any federal criminal case; that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a corporation; and that pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), the government was required to answer the proof of claims.

Since the government violated the APA, then their silence can only be equated with fraud. See U.S. v. Pruden, 424 F.2d 1021 (1970). Under the authority of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 USC section 556(D)-Burden of Proof, “the proponent of a rule or order bears the burden of proof.” The Supreme Court has stated that “if any tribunal (court) finds absences of proof of jurisdiction over person or subject matter, that case must be dismissed.” Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Motley, 211 U.S. 149 (1908).

The Attorney General was given 3 opportunities to respond to affidavits of fact and a request for a certified question of law related to the invalidity of Title 18. No response was made. In U.S. v. Kis, 658 F.2d 526 (7th Cir. 1981), the court held: “Indeed, no more than that, [Affidavits], is necessary to make the prima facie case.” Id at 536. “Moreover the threshold of relevance is a low one.” Id at 537. “The burden is therefore on the Respondent who must come forward with special facts to support a legally sufficient rebuttal or defense.” Id at 538-39. The stipulated answers are now admitted.

Included in the stipulated facts the government has now admitted are:

1.   An internal memorandum by Harley G. Lappin to Department Heads of the Bureau of Prisons on July 27, 2009 in which he states that “In order for any bill to be valid the Journals of both Houses must show that iw was passed in the presence of a Quorum. See United States v. Balin, Joseph & Co., 144 U.S. 1, 3 (1892). The Clerk of the House states that the May 12, 1947 vote was a ‘voice vote,’ but the Parliamentarian of the House states that a voice vote is only valid when the Journal shows that a quorum is present and that it’s unlawful for the Speaker of the House to sign any enrolled bill in the absence of a quorum. On May 12, 1947, a presence of 218 Members in the hall of the House was required to be entered on the Journal in order for the 44 Member 38 to 6 voice vote to be legal.”

1.   A letter from Jeff Trandahl, clerk of the House to Mr. Charles R. Degan dated June 28, 2000, in which he states: “Congress was in session on June 1,3,4,7-12 and 14-19, 1948, however Title 18 was not voted on at this time.”

1.   A letter from Karen L. Haas, clerk of the House, dated September 11, 2008, in which she stated: “After conducting a thorough examination of the journals, I found no entry in the journal of the House of any May 12, 1947 vote on the H.R. 3190 bill…”

1.   A letter by Nancy Erickson to Mr. Wayne E. Matthews dated March 9, 2009 in which she stated that “I asked the Senate Historian’s office to review the correspondence you enclosed, and they were able to verify that no action was taken by the Senate on H.R. 3190 prior to the December 19, 1947 sine die adjournment.

1.   A letter dated August 24, 2010 from the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives which stated: “Our office has conducted research of the House Journal and the Congressional Record in regards to HR 3190 and the voice vote that was taken on May 12, 1947. After researching these official proceedings of the US House of Representatives we have been unable to find the names of the 44 Members who responded to the voice vote.”

Pursuant to their oath of office, the courts are required to follow the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent.

Contact Martin Michaelsson: MM@YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com.
Brought to you by....
www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.comhttp://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2012/10/there-was-no-quorum-in-c...

Read more: http://www.ashtarcommandcrew.net/forum/topics/breaking-news-irs-and-the-fed-found-un-costitutional#ixzz2AXkhJh9T

HAARP & HURRICANE SANDY

Check out these websites BEFORE THEY DISAPPEAR!:

http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html

and

http://www.theweatherspace.com/news/TWS-102612-haarp-status-hurricane-sandy.html

HAARP monitors claim US govt created Hurricane Sandy, and that they are bringing it to make landfall in Connecticut, not Delaware as weather stations are reporting. 

HISTORICAL FACTS!! in 1863 Lincoln instituted Martial Law

             Hello All:
                      Thought you might want to know how and when Martial Law Was declared.
                                          God Bless  Love to all   


             Corp. U.S. - the Columbia Organic Act of 1871
Team Law ^ | trustee@teamlaw.org

Posted on Sunday, December 29, 2002 12:49:44 PM by RFP

HISTORICAL FACTS

from Team Law
The following 15 points are based upon factual historical evidence:

1st: In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today - what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.

2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter "Corp. U.S.") owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution's 13th Amendment. The national constitution's 13th, 14th and 15th amendments are respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th amendments in their constitution.

4th: The corporation began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th: As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system-again it has no government relation at all. The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. passes and adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. It must be noted that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th amendment. The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations. We agree, considering that they were created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

7th: Next (also 1913) Congress passed and entered the 17th amendment as ratified, even though the states had no opportunity to ratify the same. This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected.

8th: In 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for re-election in 1913 by popular vote are seated in Corp. U.S. capacity only.

9th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters WWI and passes their Emergency War Powers, and Trading with the Enemies Acts.

10th: In 1918, President Wilson is re-elected by the Electoral College but their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate; where in the new Corp. U.S., only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation. The only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any original jurisdiction government officers.

11th: In 1933, the Trading with the Enemies Act is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign controlled private corporation.

13th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program. They create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and a depository account number in the Social Security General Trust Fund (GTF). They give you the Social Security card which identifies you as the single person with authority to control the entity they created (on review: you may notice that the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, the GTF is its beneficiary and you were made its Trustee.) More importantly: this capacity does not limit you or your capacity to act in your sovereign capacity in any way.

14th: In 1968, at the national governors' conference in Lexington, Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect themselves the people would discover what had been done with their money and would likely kill them all and start over. They suggested the States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and more powerful control over the people.

15th: By 1971, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask you to contact us with any evidence you find that proves or disproves these facts.

When you find there is no error, then remember these simple facts and let no one dissuade you from the truth.

The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations, remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.

Further, it is very important that we cease to attempt to fix them. It is far more important that we learn how to reseat our original jurisdiction government and spread the word about the truth. By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world. The fact is that it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right. The process is a simple one. The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with the evidence you discover.

That means that you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Bigfoot Patriot mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.

It is time that we all start to wake up and follow the truth, that is to repent and become a moral and honorable society instead of lauding our Christianity while we stand guilty of:

a) not knowing the truth;
b) not living the truth;
c) believing that God will save us even though we have the tools to know the truth the ability to use the tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the tools we have to save ourselves and thereby become free.

The biggest problem with the so called Patriot Movement is that its proponents are all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S. even though they are blind to the truth, have no remedy, and bail out of "the system" hell bent for a rebellion that even the scripture says cannot be won. Would that we could instead unite with truth and legally, lawfully and peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government to take back control our nation.

---

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Free Republic; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 17thamendment; brettonwoods; brettonwoodsproject; corporations; dictator; executiveorder; federalreserve; imf; lincoln; martiallaw; patriotmovement; senators; seventeenthamendment; socialsecurity; tradingwithenemies; wilson

I think this explaination pretty well ties-up all the loose ends. I know the part about the 17th amendment is correct. Whaddya'all think?  

The difference of Sedition and Treason

Subject: The difference of Sedition and Treason
To:

The difference between sedition and treason consists primarily in the subjective ultimate object of the violation to the public peace. Sedition does not consist of levying war against a government nor of adhering to its enemies, giving enemies aid, and giving enemies comfort. Nor does it consist, in most representative democracies, of peaceful protest against a government, nor of attempting to change the government by democratic means (such as direct democracy or constitutional convention). Sedition is the stirring up of rebellion against the government in power. Treason is the violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or state, giving aid to enemies, or levying war against one's state. Sedition is encouraging one's fellow citizens to rebel against their state, whereas treason is actually betraying one's country by aiding and abetting another state. Sedition laws somewhat equate to terrorism and public order laws. Now you really know what Barrack Hussein Obama is guilty of!!!

"Rodney Dale Class for the republic - president"

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Reader: Abel Danger - "Rodney Dale Class for the republic - president"

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 27-Oct-2012 15:07:22

(Thanks, c. :) Reader cj writes and sends us: **************************************************************************** Hobie, I just heard the abledanger radio show with Rodney Dale Class from yesterday. I did not know Rod was running for president. It makes sense aince he has been working towards a Republic. Any political party working within the democratic system won’t restore the people’s rights unless their aim is in restoring the Republic we are meant to be. We have to kill the corporate beast from within and there isn’t anyone running that understands that more than Rod Class. (scroll to the bottom for show – Rod comes in at 45 min mark) http://presidentialfield.com/october-26-abel-danger-live I found this from Jan 2012 - Rod Class To Run For President - Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_chK0tTs-k Rod shows his stuff! WOW!!! - you won’t be disappointed. Rod explains dollars (there is no money) and loans are securitized – since US has been bankrupt 1876 and 1979 – laws we can all be attorney generals Lawyers take an oath to the corporate courts... No gold/silver, that is why we the people create “money” via our slave labor, signing up for loans, our signature makes the dollars because the country, banks are bankrupt, not we the people! Our gold went to Germany for the war, so dollars would be used for trading. (Trading with the enemy Act) 1871 USA was dissolved, and created the District of Columbia, territory. The executive orders prove we’ve been operating as a corporation. Rodney Dale Class LIVE in Manhattan - The Man for the Job 2/23/12 RodCLassin NYC29.mov http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_991881&feature=iv&src_vid=Jr_RX4lb_TQ&v=nl2XjZqAQa8 I wrote the RodClass group and received email from Rod this morning - place my name as Rodney Dale Class for the republic on the ballot

Horrific Superstorm Targets US After Gulf Stream Collapse

October 27, 2012

Horrific Superstorm Targets US After Gulf Stream Collapse

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An ominous report prepared by the Hydrometeorological Centre of Russia (HCR) on the “Frankenstorm” (aka Hurricane Sandy) barreling towards the Northeastern United States warns that this superstorms origins lie in the near complete collapse of the Deep Southerly Return Flow (DSRF) of the Gulf Stream this past week due to the unprecedented melting of the Greenland Icecap.

The Gulf Stream, together with its northern extension towards Europe, the North Atlantic Drift, is a powerful, warm, and swift Atlantic Ocean current that originates at the tip of Florida, and follows the eastern coastlines of the United States and Newfoundland before crossing the Atlantic Ocean. The Gulf Stream, also, influences the climate of the east coast of North America from Florida to Newfoundland, and the west coast of Europe.

The warm water and temperature contrast along the edge of the Gulf Stream are, also, responsible for increasing the intensity of cyclones, tropical or otherwise, such as the one approaching the US, this HCR report says.

HCR scientists in this report note that NASA had previously warned about the melting of the Greenland Icecap this past July when they released satellite photographs documenting this environmental tragedy.

The NASA satellite pictures of melt covering most of the ice sheet surface on 12 July (corroborated by several independent satellite methods and research groups) is dramatic, and several key Greenland scientists have confirmed it is unprecedented in the satellite record going back to the late 1970s. The Danish Meteorological Institute website, also, showedGreenland temperature anomalies about 2-4C higher than the 1961-90 baseline average during these last three months.

In 2010, NASA had, also, forewarned that the change in salinity caused by a massive melt-off of the Greenland Icecap could depress the Gulf Stream and alter North Atlantic circulation patterns that control weather in Europe. Combined with a loss of Arctic sea ice, NASA said, this effect could radically change global ocean circulation patterns and give rise to such superstorms such as are now occurring.

In the current situation, this report says, a strong ridge of high pressure over the Canadian Maritimes and Greenland due to this massive melt-off will help push this superstorm northwestward, into the Mid-Atlantic or New England, rather than allowing it to move out to sea.

That will also make this superstorm a slow mover, which will only worsen the damage in affected areas. A ridge of such high pressure is known as a “blocking high,” and while its occurrence is not particularly unusual, HCR experts say in this report, its intensity is.

Not just to the horrific damages from wind, rain and coastal flooding from this superstorm are to feared either, this report says, but, also, to the massive amounts of snow measuring up to nearly 1 meter (2 feet) expected to impact an area roughly 1/3 the size of the Eastern United States. A situation, HCR scientists say, that has the potential to be catastrophic as these snows fall upon trees that have yet to shed their leaves.

Most ominous, perhaps, in this report are the warnings that this unprecedented superstorm effects may, also, include earthquakes in the Northeastern US and Canadian regions such as the one that occurred in the State of Maine on 16 October and rattled all of New England, and the 10 October one that shook Montreal.

Unlike their western counterparts, it is to be noted that both Russian and Chinese scientists consider strong weather patterns as being part of the precursors, if not outright causes, of seismic events, particularly strong low pressure systems like the one associated with this superstorm about to shatter tens of millions of lives in the United States.

Interesting to note is that in 2009 the New York Times in their article titled “How Storms Can Trigger Earthquakes” supported the research of Eastern scientists, and as we can, in part, read:

New evidence shows that atmospheric low pressure systems can prompt the landslide to lurch downward. Pressure drops when warm daytime air results in low “tides,” or when fast-moving storms race onto the scene. The effect on landslides and earthquakes only occurs when the pressure plummets suddenly, causing underground water and air to shoot toward the surface. That reduces friction between grinding subterranean plates, or under a landslide that's been held immobile by abrasive dirt and rocks.

The same conclusion was reached by scientists in Taiwan this June. A study published in the journal Nature described how low pressure accompanying typhoons sparked small earthquakes along the fault between the Philippine Sea Plate and the Eurasian Plate. The scientists note that they make “a definitive connection between fault slip and changes in atmospheric pressure.”

Importantly, both studies say weather impacts can accelerate an earthly act that was bound to happen sooner or later. In other words, low pressure is not the cause of an earthquake, just the trigger.

To the final outcome of this event it is not in our knowing, other than to note, and as we’ve seen so many times in the past, the American people (especially those living in their Eastern regions about to be hit) are, perhaps, the least likely of any of Earth’s peoples able to defend themselves against this catastrophe as they have lost the simple human ability to know how survive by themselves without their governments help. 

October 27, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BYand GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]