Wednesday, February 20, 2013

...LoveLight Calls.....NOTICE TO ALL ECHELON


NOTICE TO ALL ECHELON
THUS FAR AND NO FARTHER
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE
I CLAIM ALL ABSOLUTE LOVE LIGHT
TO BE
HERE AND NOW
HERE AM I
SAY ALL THINGS ARE OF SOURCE

I CALL FORTH THE ENERGIES OF THE MOST GREAT AND MOST GLORIOUS I AM
AND SO IT IS

THE WORD IS THE MASTER KEY
I SAY BE AND IT IS

YES I CAN
I AM READY

CONDUITS CAN DO IT
EDUCE THE PLAN
NOW    (no other way)
HERE I AM
ALL ABSOLUTE PEACE-JOY-LOVE-LIGHT
=UNITY=
ALL ABSOLUTE BEINGS IMAGINE-EDUCE-MATERIALISE-REPEAT
HERE I AM
I AM NOW

KEY ITEM TO OBTAIN WHEN YOU EXCHANGE YOUR DINARS


KEY ITEM TO OBTAIN WHEN YOU EXCHANGE YOUR DINARS – 20 banker signed copies of CCC – CLEAN AND CLEAR CERTIFICATES


Just a quick update regarding the Dinar.  I've had a Business Colleague share the following information with me.  I also contacted another trusted friend who also concurs with this information when you do exchange your DInar.  I believe the form is CALLED a CCC Form.

Suggestion for when you exchange your dinar:

Request 20 copies of a “Clean and Clear Certificate” at the time of your exchange. This certificate states that the funds resulting from your exchange are clean and clear of all criminal activities.

The reason for having as many as 20 copies is that every time you open a new bank account or want to use a large amount of money for a transaction using funds resulting from your dinar exchange, you’ll want to include a “clean and clear certificate” with your paperwork to open the account, or to execute your transaction. At any time you may be asked to prove where your funds came from and whether they are clear of criminal activity. These certificates prove that the bank certifies your funds are clean and clear.

The bank or party in question will want an original each time; therefore, you’ll want to have plenty of copies so you don’t run out of them--you can’t go back later and get them-- they will only be issued at the time of the exchange.

The bank where you exchange may provide you with 3 copies and may therefore charge extra for any additional copies you request. If you are planning to exchange with a currency trader rather than a bank, ask in advance whether they will issue a “clean and clear certificate.” If not, you may want to choose another place to exchange. 

I read about this a year ago and it is in my notes to ask for thisIt's called the CCC document.  Later when bank wires are sent at your request, the receiving bank needs to know whether the funds might be of criminal origin - from drug sales or money laundering.  Therefore the bank sending the wire may ask for your source of funds and the CCC.  It lends some authority to the transaction that all is good.

But since anyone could copy them, you would have to get your banker where you are parking the source funds to not only provide 20 copies, but also SIGN THEM.!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A heavily censored story


Subject: A heavily censored story

Ronald

Speaking of an organized ring of evil doers...

This is one of the most censored stories of the last 100 years.

Witnesses have ´disappeared´, been jailed on bogus charges and outight murdered.

This video produced by UK TV, scheduled for airing in the US and then pulled, is one of the most censored in YouTube´s history.

How long this version will stay up I don´t know.

Video:


- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

================================

Visit out partner sites:

The Real Food Channel: http://RealFoodChannel.com The truth about the food you eat

Real Econ TV: http://RealEconTV.com
Financial news without the big bank baloney

Jazz on the Tube: http://JazzontheTube.com Take a jazz break

================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:

Democrats in Washington Backtrack on Plan to Allow Police to Search Gun Owners Homes Without a Warrant


Democrats in Washington Backtrack on Plan to Allow Police to Search Gun Owners Homes Without a Warrant

By Alex Thomas
theintelhub.com
February 19, 2013
A proposed law in Washington State has led to widespread uproar, with citizens decrying the provision that would allow police to search the homes of gun owners without a warrant up to once per year.
The proposed law, SB 5737, contains a startling provision that would effectively end the Fourth Amendment in the state.
“In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon.
The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.”
In response to the outcry, multiple Democrats who sponsored the legislation are now backtracking with claims that they didn’t actually read the bill and that the specific provision allowing warrant-less searches of all gun owners is being removed.
A report in the Seattle Times outlined the fact that the original bill has now been removed from the states website, replaced with an updated version that does not contain a provision allowing police to conduct door to door searches of homes.
It seemed in recent weeks lawmakers might be headed toward some common-sense regulation of gun sales. But then last week they went too far. By mistake, they claim. But still too far.
“They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”
{….}
That’s no gun-rights absolutist talking, but Lance Palmer, a Seattle trial lawyer and self-described liberal who brought the troubling Senate Bill 5737 to my attention.
It’s the long-awaited assault-weapons ban, introduced last week by three Seattle Democrats.
(Note to readers: The link above is to a new version of SB 5737, which no longer contains the disputed provision. The original version of the bill has been erased from the state’s Web site, but here you can see it as it was proposed.)
Two co sponsors were then quoted in the article as saying that they hadn’t actually read the proposed law and that staff was to blame for the horrific, unconstitutional provision.
I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on.
“I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.”
That lawmakers sponsor bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s disappointing on one of this political magnitude. Not counting a long table, it’s only an eight-page bill.
The prime sponsor, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, also condemned the search provision in his own bill, after I asked him about it. He said Palmer is right that it’s probably unconstitutional.
“I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” Murray said.
This proposed law is a part of a larger tyrannical effort to limit and or restrict the gun rights of private Americans throughout the country.
As pro gun control activists, the corporate media, and elements of the federal government continue to claim that they simply want reasonable gun control, the fact of the matter is numerous extremely unreasonable laws have been passed and or proposed in the wake of the horrific mass shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.
In early February Democrats in California floated the idea of outright gun confiscation as they attempted to one up New York in regards to the strictest gun law in the country.
Among the measures is one that would outlaw the future sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines. The restriction would prevent quick reloading by requiring bullets to be loaded one at a time.
Lawmakers also want to make some prohibitions apply to current gun owners, not just to people who buy weapons in the future.
{…..}
That’s right, gun confiscation, a possibility that has been ridiculed by the corporate media and the left for years is now being openly talked about as if they didn’t just spend years and years trying to convince the American people that gun confiscation is simply a right-wing conspiracy theory with no basis in actual fact.
Shortly after the idea was floated in California, a proposed law was introduced into the Missouri House of Representatives that included outright gun confiscation of all semi-automatic weapons.
A section in the proposed law calls for direct confiscation:
“Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.
Residents will be ordered to “remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri… Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or… Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.”
The two examples above are merely an example of the numerous gun control measures that have been either proposed or talked about by gun grabbing politicians throughout the country.
Sadly, we are seeing the largest attack on gun rights in the history of America.
Regardless of what the gun grabbers claim, the facts clearly show that most if not all plans for gun control are thinly veiled attempts at much more tyrannical gun restrictions.
Obviously most can agree that some sort of background check system should be in place but this is far from the only thing the gun grabbers are pushing.)
For a complete report on calls for gun confiscation throughout the country click here. (up to 16 states have proposed laws that would ban all semi-automatics)
Alex Thomas is an investigative journalist, researcher, and the co-founder and editor of theintelhub.com. You can follow him on Twitter here and like our page on Facebook here.

Sucking the hind teat of a dead cow…….


Respond to this post by replying above this line


New post on The PPJ Gazette


Sucking the hind teat of a dead cow…….

by ppjg
This is so good I can hardly stand it.  This guy says it all..  Watch this now before YouTube censors it.    

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://ppjg.me/2013/02/19/sucking-the-hind-teat-of-a-dead-cow/

CA Gov. Brown Paroles 377 Convicted Killers


Subject: CA Gov. Brown Paroles 377 Convicted Killers

The world has gone NUTS!
Lunatics like Jerry Brown are the reason WHY WE WILL NEVER GIVE UP OUR GUNS!!!!
Pat

CA Gov. Brown Paroles 377 Convicted Killers

by Stephen Frank on 02/18/2013 · 565060 commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fcapoliticalnews.com%2F2013%2F02%2F18%2Fca-gov-brown-paroles-377-convicted-killers%2FCA+Gov.+Brown+Paroles+377+Convicted+Killers2013-02-19+06%3A12%3A48Stephen+Frankhttp%3A%2F%2Fcapoliticalnews.com%2F%3Fp%3D56506     Print This Post Print This Post
Arnold and Jerry have allowed over 50,000 criminals either freed for prison or allow them not to go at all, because a Judge wanted them to be “comfortable”.  Now we are watching as city after city, county after county reports a spike in crime.  Just to make sure crime gets worse, Guv Jerry is making sure murderers get paroled in large numbers.  We need more of them on the streets.
This is going on as communities are cutting back cops and sheriffs!  Feel safe?  Obama also wants your guns.

“According to Brown, he expunged the records of 128 felons last year, and also gave the greenlight to parole for 377 convicted murders, a full 81 percent of all those the parole board recommended go free. Virtually all other California governors have rejected

Some of the murderers who will now walk the streets of California include:
Lawrence Owens, 43, who kicked and punched a man over a $20 drug deal, then watched his friend beat him to death with a concrete slab.”
See the full story by clicking on the blue headline

CA Gov. Brown Paroles 377 Convicted Killers

by Ben Shapiro, Big Government,  2/18/13

In 1988, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis lost his presidential race in no small part due to the fact that he had paroled violent criminals. Taking a page from Dukakis’ book, California Governor Jerry Brown is now making a habit of paroling convicted murders. According to Brown, he expunged the records of 128 felons last year, and also gave the greenlight to parole for 377 convicted murders, a full 81 percent of all those the parole board recommended go free. Virtually all other California governors have rejected

Some of the murderers who will now walk the streets of California include:
  • Bert Cole, 43, a former Graveyard Crip who shot a man to death after mistaking him for a competing gang member;
  • Lawrence Owens, 43, who kicked and punched a man over a $20 drug deal, then watched his friend beat him to death with a concrete slab.
According to Brown, the courts have been pushing hard to release inmates slated for release by the parole board. But that’s no excuse. There may be a Willie Horton in Jerry Brown’s future – and a bevy of victims, too.


Tim Turner update


I would love to be a fly on the wall and see this case from start to finish....
I hope he wins....that would be a big blow to the feds....

Tim Turner update

http://www.dothaneagle.com/news/article_4ea50b6a-77db-11e2-ba3a-001a4bcf6878.html 

Progressive Insurance....Who are they?


Have you heard about this?

The "Harley Owners Group", the biggest motorcycle club in America, maybe even the world, hasn't found any members that have Progressive Insurance since the word got out about Progressives communist affiliations.  Just being associated with George Soros should bring chills up your back.  Oh, you don't know who George Soros is?  He finances the Obama progressive affiliations.


Progressive Insurance....Who are they?  You've seen and probably smiled at the clever Progressive Insurance TV commercials. Well, as Paul Harvey would say, "You're about to learn the rest of the story". 




PROGRESSIVE  AUTO INSURANCE 
You know their TV commercials, the ones featuring the ditsy actress all dressed in white. What you might not know is that the Chairman of Progressive is Peter Lewis, one of the major funders of leftist causes in America .


Between 2001 and 2003, Lewis funneled $15 million to the ACLU, the group most responsible for destroying what's left of Americas Judeo-Christian heritage.

Lewis  also gave $12.5 million to MoveOn.org <http://moveon.org/> .org/%3e"  rel=nofollow target=_blank>"  href="http://moveon/<http://moveon.org/> and America  Coming Together, two key propaganda arms of the socialist  left.
His funding for these groups was conditional on matching contributions from George Soros, the America-hating socialist who is the chief financier of the Obama political machine. 

Lewis made a fortune as a result of capitalism, but now finances a progressive movement that threatens to destroy the American free enterprise system that is targeting television shows on Fox News.  Peter Lewis is making a fortune off conservative Americans (who buy his auto insurance) that he then applies to dismantle the very system that made him wealthy. He's banking on no one finding out who he is, so STOP buying Progressive Insurance and pass this information on to all your friends.  Chairman  Lewis' gift helps the ACLU promote their anti-Christmas agenda such as:


§  Removing nativity scenes from public property


§  Banning songs such as Silent Night from schools


§  Refusing to  allow students to write about the Christian aspect of Christmas in school projects


§  Renaming Christmas break Winter break


§  Refusing to allow a city sponsored Christmas parade to be called a Christmas  parade


§  Not allowing a Christmas tree in a public school


§  Renaming a Christmas tree displayed on public property a Holiday tree In addition to their war on Christmas, the ACLU uses gifts like that from Chairman Lewis to:


§  Sue states to force them to legalize homosexual marriage


§  Force libraries to remove porn filters from their computers


§  Sue the Boy Scouts to force them to accept homosexuals as scout leaders


§  Help legalize child pornography


§  Legalize live sex acts in bars in Oregon


§  Protect the North American Man Boy Love Association whose motto is "sex by eight or it is too late"


§  Censor student led prayer at graduation


§  Remove "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance


§  Remove "In God We Trust" on our currency


Verify  at:http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/peterlewis.asp

or: http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/a/aclu-lewis.htm

. 

All  of a sudden I don't care for their "funny  commercials".


PS:  IGNORANCE CAN BE TERMINAL  SO, SAVE A FRIEND & SHARE THIS MAIL WITH  OTHERS.






I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 12448 of my spam emails to date.

Do you have a slow PC? Try a free scan!

Monsanto being sued by Farmers $7.7 Billion


Monsanto Slapped With A $7.7 Billion Lawsuit By 5 Million Farmers

Image
WorldTruth.TV

Launching a lawsuit against the very company that is responsible for a farmer suicide every 30 minutes, 5 million farmers are now suing Monsanto for as much as 6.2 billion euros (around 7.7 billion US dollars). The reason? As with many other cases, such as the ones that led certain farming regions to be known as the ‘suicide belt’, Monsanto has been reportedly taxing the farmers to financial shambles with ridiculous royalty charges. The farmers state that Monsanto has been unfairly gathering exorbitant profits each year on a global scale from “renewal” seed harvests, which are crops planted using seed from the previous year’s harvest.
The practice of using renewal seeds dates back to ancient times, but Monsanto seeks to collect massive royalties and put an end to the practice. Why? Because Monsanto owns the very patent to the genetically modified seed, and is charging the farmers not only for the original crops, but the later harvests as well. Eventually, the royalties compound and many farmers begin to struggle with even keeping their farm afloat. It is for this reason that India slammed Monsanto with groundbreaking  ‘bio-piracy’ charges  in an effort to stop Monsanto from ‘patenting life’.
Jane Berwanger, a lawyer for the farmers who went on record regarding the case, told the Associated Press:
“Monsanto gets paid when it sell the seeds. The law gives producers the right to multiply the seeds they buy and nowhere in the world is there a requirement to pay (again). Producers are in effect paying a private tax on production.”


 

The West watches in silence while Al-Qaeda conquers the Muslim world.





Taliban and Al-Qaeda expand their influence in the Muslim world - Photo: EPA


The West watches in silence while Al-Qaeda          
conquers the Muslim world (AQ is an American Nazi CIA sponsored terrorist group)
by Afshin Elian February 18, 2013

Al-Qaeda strives for perfection

The Associated Press found a document in an Al-Qaeda branch inTimbuktu that confirms this assertion.
In this 9 page document the leadership of Al-Qaida in the Maghreb (North Africa) demands that the jihadists deal in a fatherly manor with the population.

The letter was written by Abu Musab Abdul Wadad also known as Abdelmalek Droukdel. He is the leader of Al-Qaeda in the Maghreb. He demands his brothers to treat the conquered Muslims like children and handle them with a soft hand. The fighters are not allowed to apply the Sharia law immediately in all its facets. 

Babies! The conquered Muslims are like babies.  The baby in question is only a few days old.  He crawls on his knees, and has not stood on his own feet yet. If we want him to stand on his own feet in this world full of enemies, who are eager to strike. We must lighten his load, take him by the hand, and help and support him, until he can stand on his own. Islamic terrorism sees Muslims as babies, incompetent and immature.

Al-Qaeda learns through trials and error how to operate with more intellect. One of the wrong decisions you took, was the extreme speed in which you brought in the Sharia law, instead of bringing it as gradual evolution in to an environment that is not well informed about the religion. 

Real Islam!

Muslims should be educated according to the real Islam. They need to be taught what that is. The burning question is, for whom is this operational modification intended? In the first place is this policy directed to the conquered Muslims, in order to pacify and re Islamatise them. In the second place, its aimed at the western world. Let us begin with the western world. If Al-Qaeda fighters in Iraq or Afghanistan had been willing to operate calmer, they would have been able to pacify much sooner a significant number of Western policymakers and so called experts, and perhaps even a few intellectuals.

Sharia!

Do you know what they would have said in the West? They are moderate Muslims with a moderate Islam and we should deal with them with patience and thoughtfulness. Then the western Islamologists would have stood in line by now, explaining that the Al-Qaida regimes isn’t so bad at all. Because they do not perform all aspects of the Sharia law. Yes they do cut of hands, but they do not stone people to death! Policymakers would ask politicians to influence such regimes trough helping them with development projects. 

Are those policies aimed to fool the Western world?

The regime of Al-Qaida and the Taliban in Afghanistan were not overthrown by the Afghan people,but by the Westerners.

Most Afghans submitted themselves to the Islamic regime.

Pure Islam!

The same applies to Mali. There are the Al'Qa'ida fighters defeated by the French, and not by the local government.
Even there did the people not massively start a revolt against the Islamists. They were everywhere on the winning side. This is what’s it all about.!  The Al-Qaida leaders tell the fighters not to give cause for Western intervention.
Al-Qaeda wants his jihadis to re Islamatise the conquered Muslims with patience. In the first phase, the Salafist imams must trough nonstop  propaganda, teach the conquered Muslims what pure Islam is all about.  Meanwhile, an Al-Qaida regime would represent itself  through Western passivity or even development organizations, as a normal regime to the conquered people. In that way they want to use international legitimacy to increase  their powerbase in the nation.

China and Russia!

After that they will gradually introduced Sharia law. And as soon as the Al-Qaida regimes are strong enough, they can continue with their jihadist military ambitions. In the meantime during this period of state-building they can buy weapons in China or Russia.  And according to this strategy they also must stop their attacks on other Muslims, like the Shiites.

Al-Qaeda starts to develop a clear policy over this construction of an Islamic state. From where did they get this wisdom? Who was the model? The answer? Iran!  There the Imam Khomeini promised anything and everything to the West and his conquered Iranian Muslims.  He pacified the left and the liberals in his own country.  Initially he received support from the leftist and the liberal groups.  Then, gradually an Islamic state was founded and a  gradual introduction of the Sharia law took place.

Intellectuals!

Later on they started to train and support Islamic terrorists from other countries.  In this period The Islamists developed state friendly ties with China and Russia,so they could arm themselves to the teeth.

And the Westerners?

They were and still are kept in confusion.  In the eyes of the Western policymakers and intellectuals Iran isn’t so bad at all.  The business of Al-Qaeda is nothing more than a strategic insight.  The creation and development of the Islamic state in Iran still counts for many jihadis, despite their Sunni origin, as an example of how to build an Islamic state.  

In reality, this document of the Al-Qaeda policy is something to be deeply concerned about.