This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
A loud boom caused all kinds of concern in Springfield late Wednesday
morning. Dispatchers took several calls after the noise this morning around
11:45 a.m. It’s still unclear what made the sound. Some of the early reports
were possibly a car backfiring or a blown transformer. Calls were reported all
over town. – KTTS
Here another video showing that these loud booms shook houses and were heard
last two days all in South Carolina.
Update about South Carolina booms. Source already exposed in a previous
post. Sorry for that!
Loud booming explosion are probably related to Army trainings in northern
Beaufort County, SC – March 6 2013 http://strangesounds.org/2013/03/loud-rumbling-and-strange-booming-sounds-heard-in-springfield-missouri-and-all-around-the-three-county.html http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=271206
Rome, March 7 - An anonymous report of a group of over 20 moles planning to leak more information from inside the Vatican was circulating in Italian media on Thursday.
"There are many, more than 20 people, all tied to the Holy See. We're made up of men and women, laypeople and prelates," an anonymous, self-proclaimed former mole said, according to an interview in Italian daily La Repubblica.
Anonymous and unsourced reports from alleged insiders at the Vatican have been surfacing in Italian media in the weeks following the announcement of Benedict XVI's resignation on February 11.
Many outlets have speculated that one motive for Benedict's abdication was the so-called Vatileaks case last year, when the pope's butler was arrested and eventually pardoned for leaking secret Church documents to the Italian press.
"The butler isn't the only mole," the anonymous source said in the interview. "If we leaked documents from the pope's apartment, it was to create more transparency in the Church. Now, after Benedict XVI's resignation from the papacy, and on the verge of the conclave, the Vatileaks case will continue to take the spotlight. And for us, the moment has returned for us to talk,"
On Thursday, the last of the cardinal elector was expected to arrive in Rome, at which point they could choose a date for the conclave to name a new pope.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uy6aiXxEF9s
Published on Feb 28, 2013 http://www.PrometheanReach.com Santos Bonacci, Kevin Annett, Kate of Gaia, and Tony Z on Quantum Leap TV with Johnny Guzman. Recorded on February 25th, 2013.
'Tonight on "The Truth Hour" BREAKING NEWS "The Downfall of the Vatican The Queen & The System" Join us tonight for an EXCLUSIVE Program... We have Kevin Annett from International Tribunal Into Crimes of Church and State to discuss todays GUILTY Verdict!!! Plus Tony Z, Kate of Gaia and special guest Santos Bonacci, they will be presenting breaking news regarding teleportation and secret projects... This is a show you don't want to miss!!! See us live here at: http://qltelevision.com/index.php/mul... ... for all of our previous programs visit our YouTube Channel: QL Television' http://universaltruthschool.com/ http://www.qlpmultimedia.com/
I've posted stories of rescues by angelic forces before, but this one takes the cake...or donut:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WHEN GOD RESCUES US, SOMETIMES IT'S BY WAY OF ANGELS WHO CAN TAKE ANY FORM THEY LIKE Rescued by an Angel by Cindy Loflin and Kathleen Finn
On November 4, 2007, my friend Kathleen and I experienced a mysterious rescue.
Around 8:00 p.m., I was driving us home to Nashville from Knoxville, heading west on I-40. We were transporting my Bernese Mountain Dog Jade from a dog show (where she'd won her class and earned points towards her championship).
Jade was in the back of my large Toyota Sequoia SUV. We were traveling up a very steep mountain without any lights, exits or commercial areas anywhere.
The night was clear as we climbed the Cumberland Plateau toward Harriman. There were no other cars on the road, and we were enjoying the peaceful drive after Jade's hectic show schedule.
Suddenly, we both were overwhelmed with a sense of evil approaching from behind. We looked at each other in shock as a sports car came speeding up close behind us and stayed right on the Sequoia's tail....
~~~~~ CONTINUE AT: ~~~~~ http://www.spiritdaily.com/rescuedangel.htm
great many people around the county were rightfully shocked and horrified by the recent excellent and hard-hitting PBS documentary, The Untouchables, which looked at the problem of high-ranking Wall Street crooks going unpunished in the wake of the financial crisis. The PBS piece certainly rattled some cages, particularly in Washington, in a way that few media efforts succeed in doing. (Scroll to the end of this post to watch the full documentary.)
Now, two very interesting and upsetting footnotes to that groundbreaking documentary have emerged in the last weeks.
The first involves one of the people interviewed for the story, a former high-ranking executive from Countrywide financial who turned whistleblower named Michael Winston. You can see Michael's segment ofThe Untouchables at around the 4:20 mark of the piece. The story Winston told during the documentary is essentially an eyewitness account of the beginning of the financial crisis.
When I spoke to him last week, Winston was still as amazed and repulsed by what he saw at Angelo Mozilo's crooked subprime mortgage company as he was when he worked there. Winston, who had worked for years at high-level positions at companies like Motorola and Lockheed before joining Countrywide in the 2000s, described a moment in his first months at the company, when he rolled into the parking lot at the company headquarters.
"There was a guy there, a well-dressed guy, standing next to a car that had a vanity plate," he said. "And the plate read, 'FUND'EM.'"
Winston, curious, asked the guy what the plate meant. The man laughed and said, "That's Angelo Mozilo's growth strategy for 2006." Here's how Winston described the rest of the story to PBS – i.e. what happened when he asked the man to elaborate:
"What if the person doesn't have a job?"
"Fund 'em," the – the guy said.
And I said, "What if he has no income?"
"Fund 'em."
"What if he has no assets?" And he said, "Fund 'em."
Later on, Winston would hear that the company's unofficial policy was that if a loan applicant could "fog a mirror," he would be given a loan.
This kind of information is absolutely crucial to understanding what caused the subprime crisis. There are people out there still willing to argue that the government somehow "forced the banks to lend" to unworthy applicants. In reality, it was unscrupulous companies like Countrywide that were cranking out loans en masse, knowing that these loans would be unloaded down the line, first to banks and then to sucker investors like pension funds and foreign trade unions, almost as soon as they were created.
Winston was a witness to all of this. Eventually, he would be asked by the firm to present false information to the Moody's ratings agency, which was about to give Countrywide a negative rating because of some trouble the company was having in working a smooth succession from one set of company leaders to another.
When Winston refused, he was essentially stripped of his normal responsibilities and had his corporate budget slashed. When Bank of America took over the company, Winston's job was terminated. He sued, and in one of the few positive outcomes for any white-collar whistleblower anywhere in the post-financial-crisis universe, won a $3.8 million wrongful termination suit against Bank of America last February.
Well, just weeks after the PBS documentary aired, the Court of Appeals in the state of California suddenly took an interest in Winston's case. Normally, a court of appeals can only overturn a jury verdict in a case like this if there is a legal error. It's not supposed to relitigate the factual evidence.
Yet this is exactly what happened: The court decided that the evidence that Winston was wrongfully terminated was insufficient, and then from there determined that the "legal error" in the original Winston suit against Bank of America and Countrywide was that the judge in the case failed to throw out the jury's verdict:
In short, having scoured the record for evidence supporting the jury's verdict on the issue of causation, we have found none. It follows that the trial court erred in denying defendants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
"I was flabbergasted," Winston says now. "Think of all the hard work the jury did, and [the court] overturns it just like that."
While it's impossible to say just exactly what a fair financial award should be for a person who reports bad corporate activity to the public, it's certainly true that when these whistleblower suits end in failure, it has a chilling effect on other people thinking about coming forward. Not many people are willing to risk their jobs if they think it will cost them every last dime in the end. This is just one more example of how hard it is for whistleblowers to come out even, even if they win jury trials.
That decision came down on February 19th, and is the first of the two interesting post-Untouchablesfootnotes.
The other involves some of the comments made by the head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, Lanny Breuer, who said (as he has on other occasions, including after the recent non-prosecutions of HSBC and UBS for major scandals) that his Justice Department has to weigh the financial consequences of bringing prosecutions. Quoting from the PBS show, Breuer explained:
But in any given case, I think I and prosecutors around the country, being responsible, should speak to regulators, should speak to experts, because if I bring a case against institution A, and as a result of bringing that case, there's some huge economic effect - if it creates a ripple effect so that suddenly, counterparties and other financial institutions or other companies that had nothing to do with this are affected badly - it's a factor we need to know and understand.
When Breuer said that, it raised a serious red flag on the Hill. A number of people in positions of power wanted to know just what "experts" people like Breuer had consulted with before deciding not to press charges in certain cases. Iowa Republican Senator Chuck Grassley and Ohio Democrat Sherrod Brown, specifically, sent Attorney General Eric Holder a letterasking a number of questions.
Among other things, the two Senators wanted to know if certain companies had been designated "Too Big to Jail." Then they had a series of very obvious and reasonable questions about those "experts":
4. Please provide the names of all outside experts consulted by the Justice Department in making prosecutorial decisions regarding financial institutions with over $1 billion in assets.
5. Please provide any compensation contracts for these individuals.
6. How did DOJ ensure that these experts provided unconflicted and unbiased advice to DOJ?
Most of the letter is just a long list of the many wondrous accomplishments the DOJ has secured under Eric Holder's watch, including felony manslaughter convictions against BP, or "fraud convictions for a board member of Goldman, Sachs," or the ongoing LIBOR investigation, or the prosecution in the Stanford Ponzi case. But the rest of the letter totally ignores the Brown/Grassley questions, particularly on the matter of which experts were and are being consulted.
On those questions, the DOJ would say only that "it is entirely appropriate for prosecutors to hear from subject matter experts at relevant regulatory authorities" and that...
When the Department consults with relevant regulatory authorities, or hears from companies who are targets of the Department's investigations and their counsel regarding potential collateral consequences of enforcement actions, neither those agencies nor the target companies receive any compensation from the Department.
That is one hell of a slippery piece of language. It's great that the Department of Justice is not paying, say, HSBC to consult with them on the question of whether or not HSBC should be prosecuted. What a relief! But that doesn't mean they're not paying someone else for that kind of advice.
The DOJ similarly blew off naming any individual experts and they refused absolutely to turn over information about any compensation they may have paid out to whomever it is who is whispering in their prosecutorial ears.
The two Senators late last week issued a blistering answer to the DOJ letter, saying, "the Justice Department's response is aggressively evasive," and that "the Department's only clear response was that it speaks to regulators and the banks themselves."
The Department of Justice is now saying that it misunderstood the two Senators, that it didn't know that they were asking for the actual names of those experts. Moreover, the Department claims it is working on answers to those queries.
In the meantime, Eric Holder is appearing before the Judiciary Committee this Wednesday, and it will be interesting to see how he handles questioning from Senator Grassley. It may get ugly before the answers actually come out, but it seems that someone is finally determined to get some real information.
Here is a video for
those who think every piece ofnews must be glorified on
TV or it is not news worthy or not true...... or
perhaps out their government walks on water.... I know it
will take major changes but perhaps this 3 minutes will get
their attention.... til next TV show......
I have been told many times if I don't like America whydon't I go elsehere????? DUH!!!! Excuse me while I go throw up... If these know it alls could get out of front of TV and think a little bit, research with someone not in a clown outfit, and start putting 2 and 2 together, perhaps they might
start recognizing not only America's problem but a world-wideproblem and that is the criminals (sick minds) running this country (world). And no it is not a Romans 13 dis-obedience to get rid of these sadistic beings either.... The process is
happening and perhaps you are aware and perhaps you are not aware... Chevez, Pope, daddy Bush, now G.W., Hillary, Bill, Queen, and many many
others you most likely not recognize have either died or have been
hospitalized with sicknesses....?????
Take a moment and think about it. Remember it, Share it and maybe, just maybe, we can be great again!
The point of this video? Not to create animosity nor give an audience to hateful statements from people who, because of their own apathy, in part created the world we now live. The point of this video is to make anyone who cares to pull together and stop the down fall as best as they can. To be good to one another and stop blaming everybody else for our own short comings. To heal ourselves so that we can heal others. Not as separate parts, but as a whole sum of Humanity!
This video has now been seen in 190+ countries! Still people don't seem to be getting the point. I am a human being just as you. Doing things for the right reasons just as you. If your not treating your fellow man (Mankind) (Human Beings) with compassion, or at least treating them as you would be treated, then how are you helping the situation. And if your not helping the situation, then what are you doing? Its not about invisible lines that divide us rather human qualities that unit us.
It's a lie to think your not good enough. There are two entities in the world. 1. Evil This is where one feels Anger, Jealousy, Greed, Resentment, Lies, and Inferiority. 2. Goodness This is where one feels Joy, Peace, Love, Hope, Humility, Kindness, Empathy and Truth. As I read over the comments I see both Evil and Goodness shared. It is not a country that is evil or good. Rather it is a personal choice of the people in any country to be either Good or Evil. And they do so through their actions.
There are a number of limitations to this blog and format which we are about to correct.
We are working on a new expanded website with its own unique address and contact ids. It will be separate and not be connected to Google.
This shall be an adjunct to this present blog. An additional private intel room shall be provided to share the latest & greatest intel.
We are also adding a number of pages and links for expanded information and services. It will be a fast paced live service for the internet. And it will be an honest site for the people.
I am looking for additional authors and services which can utilize this site.
In short we are are trying to create an active real news site with multi level helpful ideas for the families of the patriotic mindset.
You can add your own section complete with your own ad links for your income. Your suggestions and comments are most welcome. And this time You can get credit for them.
Email your suggestions to johnmachaffie@gmail.com with subject "NESARA NEW SITE"
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
great many people around the county were rightfully shocked and horrified by the recent excellent and hard-hitting PBS documentary, The Untouchables, which looked at the problem of high-ranking Wall Street crooks going unpunished in the wake of the financial crisis. The PBS piece certainly rattled some cages, particularly in Washington, in a way that few media efforts succeed in doing. (Scroll to the end of this post to watch the full documentary.)
