Conference of the Iraqi Bank in Dubai (video) IT'S IN ARABIC BUT I WOULD LIKE YOU TO LISTEN TO 38 MINUTE MARK IT IS IN ENGLISH.SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IS COMING TO THE CBI.
http://www.alsharqiya.com/?p=
http://www.alsharqiya.com/?p=
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Direct Intel
PER CONVERSATION WITH AGENCY CONTACT, THE BAD GUYS ARE GOING DOWN, LOOK FOR MORE FOREX TRADERS TO BE FIRED AND RESIGNING VIA THE GLOBAL FX PROBES (CURRENCY MANIPULATION) AT MORE LARGE BANKS. ADDITIONALLY, MANY OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO WILL NOT BE RETURNING ARE TIED TO THE FX PROBES DIRECTLY & INDIRECTLY IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
IF ALL GOES AS PLANNED THE GENERAL PUBLIC SHOULD EXCHANGE WITHIN THE NEXT 24-48 HOURS AND THIS IS TIED DIRECTLY TO IRAQ GOING INTERNATIONAL & IT IS NOT TIED TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT CONTRACT & AGREEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES WITH THE IRAQI DINAR CURRENCY.
IF ALL GOES AS PLANNED THE GENERAL PUBLIC SHOULD EXCHANGE WITHIN THE NEXT 24-48 HOURS AND THIS IS TIED DIRECTLY TO IRAQ GOING INTERNATIONAL & IT IS NOT TIED TO THE PRIVATE PLACEMENT CONTRACT & AGREEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES WITH THE IRAQI DINAR CURRENCY.
Tony
Tony
Rates of 3.77 are showing on the executive forex boards. We have four confirmations that they are live and just a matter of time before they come out. Why are they showing up there and why lower than what we heard they were going to be? The answer is because the administration isn't doing it. That is something Iraq is doing on their own. If Iraq pushes out their rate internationally, we will be able to exchange at that rate but we will not get the contract rates. So, we would prefer for this to be released in the US now. [Have you gotten any rates on the dong?] Yes, as of the a.m. $.71. I am looking for this to happen this week, the question is, is our country gonna do the right thing with the contract rate to us.
Travelgate
Travelgate
- Travelgate Articles
- Web sites
- Bibliography
Written by The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica
Thank you for helping us expand this topic!
Simply begin typing or use the editing tools above to add to this article.
Once you are finished and click submit, your modifications will be sent to our editors for review.
Simply begin typing or use the editing tools above to add to this article.
Once you are finished and click submit, your modifications will be sent to our editors for review.
The topic Travelgate is discussed in the following articles:
Clinton
-
Hillary was criticized on other matters as well, including her role in the firing of seven staff members from the White House travel office (“Travelgate”) and her involvement in legal maneuvering by the White House during the Whitewater investigation. As the 1996 election approached, she was less visible and played a more traditional role as first lady. Her first book, ...
Starr
-
...into the suicide of White House counsel Vincent Foster, a longtime friend of the Clintons, but the matter was eventually closed. He subsequently was directed to investigate what came to be known asTravelgate, involving the firing of longtime White House workers, and Filegate, pertaining to FBI files on Republicans that were found in the White House. In 1998, however, allegations of an affair...
Notations dealing with 'Travelgate
Vince Foster committed suicide July 20, 1993. In the spring and early summer of that year 'Travelgate' erupted. It was one of a series of problems and 'scandals' Foster was confronting - not only in his role as deputy White House counsel but - as in the case of Whitewater - in his role as personal lawyer for the Clintons. It all took a toll on Foster, and his wife and friends sensed his gathering despair.
Before clicking here for the notations from Foster's journal, the following brief background on Travelgate is helpful in understanding the notations:
Harry Thomason, a close friend of the Clintons, and Thomason's partner Darnell Martens, had helped the Clinton campaign by providing charter air service. After the election, Harry was everywhere in and around the White House, working on improving the First Couple's image. His most disastrous meddling came when his partner Darnell told Harry he'd heard rumors that the White House Travel Office was corrupt, and worse, disloyal to the First Family. (This happened in the time frame of the leaks about marital discord in the White House and everyone was ultra sensitive.) So Harry began pressing Hillary, telling her that the travel office people were "a bunch of crooks" and that "we've got to get our people in there."
Hillary, in turn, pressed Vince Foster and David Watkins (who in her opinion were already failing her because of leaks, the secret service, etc,). Quickly, the whole messy and silly 'Travelgate' episode was in full swing.
The FBI was called in. A young cousin of Clinton's appointed herself undercover agent in the Travel Office and started sneaking memos away in the dark of night. Harry Thomason kept asking Watkins what was being done. Hillary kept asking Vince Foster what was being done. The FBI showed a disconcerting willingness to help find some evidence of wrongdoing (though none of them had any solid basis for suspicion except for those 'rumors.')
In the end, seven staffers in the Travel Office were fired. But the staffers had pals in the press who wrote their story and suddenly Congress is talking about an investigation into the firing.
Suddenly, the White House (it's now May-June-July 1993) is on the defensive, trying to explain itself. At a press conference, George Stephanoupolos says the FBI had evidence the travel office people were crooks - an assertion that the FBI disputes.
And then came the inevitable self-inquiry, led by White House lawyer John Podesta, which was aimed at pointing the finger some place besides at Hillary and her meddling friend, Harry Thomason. In the end, David Watkins and, to a degree Vince Foster got the blame.
All of this made Foster quite sick. He was integrally involved in Travelgate, having been consulted by Watkins because he was a White House lawyer. He'd overseen the 'investigation' of the seven Travel Office employees (though he'd always been cautious about acting precipitously). He'd participated in meetings with the FBI. And most importantly, he'd discussed the problem with Hillary - who had impatiently asked him "what's being done" about those crooked, disloyal Travel Office people.
Over the course of several weeks, Foster, in his careful, lawyerly, increasingly distressed fashion, laid out his case in a private chronology he kept in a spiral notebook. He'd write down his memory of events, consult his calendar, add things here and there. And then, he'd write it all down again, over and over, narrowing, broadening, editing - obsessing, in other words. He plainly feared embarrassment and public humiliation in a Congressional hearing that he believed was coming. Through it all, he was clearly motivated by his pointed intention to protect HRC - the Client.
Read the notations from his journal:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/arkansas/etc/foster.html
NEIL KEENAN UPDATE: THE CABAL IS IN CHECK!!! CHECKMATE COMING!
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
NEIL KEENAN UPDATE: THE CABAL IS IN CHECK!!! CHECKMATE COMING!
Posted By: Lymerick [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 5-Feb-2014 19:15:01
Date: Wednesday, 5-Feb-2014 19:15:01
|
1 0 0 0 1
I received this write up from an HOA (POA, COA, etc.) homeowner advocate from Florida and thought their view and knowledge should be shared concerning the basis for the abuses inflicted by some HOA's on innocent homeowners in America.
Too many innocent homeowners are homeless due to no fault of
their own.
They were in the wrong HOA, etc., at the wrong time, or
someone on their board, or associated with their board didn't like them,
or was jealous of them, or they were the easiest to get financially due to
family/gender status, or as an elder, or disabled homeowner, or they had a lot
of equity in their home, and/or they stumbled over some type of criminality, or
wrongdoing within the association and they sought accountability for it.
Please take the time to look at the decades of cases of
innocent homeowners and how their lives, families and rights have been
violated, while their finances and health have been devastated and their
homes have been stolen. There needs to be legitimate investigations
in every state of these groups and who the perpetrators
are. No matter who they are, or who they know, they should be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
cs
"Nationwide, there are 300,000 H.O.A. corporations,
governing more than 60 million Americans who pay $50 billion (with a “b”) in
H.O.A. dues per year. It is an enormous industry. H.O.A. corporations are among
the least regulated businesses in America. Consumer protections rules are
non-existent or not enforced. Embezzlement and other financial crimes are
occurring in epidemic proportions. And American home owners have been losing
their 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 7th, and 8th Amendment rights under the “repressive libertarianism” guise
of contract law, because H.O.A.s are private corporations not bound by the
United States Constitution.
For decades, municipalities have been requiring the creation
of H.O.A. corporations as a condition of granting building permits to developers.
The local governments get to collect taxes for goods and services – e.g., road
maintenance, utilities, trash removal, open space, recreational facilities,
etc. – that they no longer provide. As a result, homeowners in H.O.A.s end up
being double-taxed; once by the government and again by their H.O.A.
corporation. The growth of H.O.A.s has been supply-driven to benefit developers
and governments, not
demand-driven by consumers.
demand-driven by consumers.
Two-thirds of H.O.A. residents have a negative view of
H.O.A.s, with 1/5 saying they “have been in what they call a ‘war’ with their
H.O.A.” These are tens of millions of Americans, a large constituency that
has been ignored by our policy-makers and pundits. Yet “free-marketeers”
have nothing but praise for H.O.A.s, lauding them as a desirable model
of corporate governance by private contract. Something is obviously wrong
with their socioeconomic theories.
For years, our legislators have been offering the illusion
of reform, deferring to H.O.A. corporations instead of individual home owners,
while doing nothing to remove the perverse incentives and moral hazards built
into the collective ownership of your private property. H.O.A. boards engage in
destructive litigation against their involuntary members for trivial amounts and
reasons, hiding behind the corporate veil, collecting and spending other
people’s money to use against them. Meanwhile, Community Associations Institute
(C.A.I.) attorneys profit greatly by feeding off of American home owners. “It’s
called capitalism. It’s the free market,” they say."
AS, Homeowner advocate, Florida
Note: The advocate stated: " H.O.A.s are private
corporations not bound by the United States Constitution. I think they meant to
say:
"HOA's are private corporations, who act like
they are not bound by the United States Constitution."
I am awaiting a response from the advocate on this, but I
wanted to get this out, so I am sending it the way it was written.
cs
HOLLOW EARTH NETWORK
|
||||||||||||||||
Video: Obamacare Dismantled in Less Than Five Minutes
Video: Obamacare
Dismantled in Less Than Five Minutes
Guy Benson | Feb
05, 2014
Recommend this article 
927
- Tweet
137
"The product is good," President Obama intoned during a bizarrely triumphal Rose Garden photo-op three short weeks into the Obamacare roll-out debacle. "It's high quality, and it's affordable," he said, adding that early participants were "thrilled" with the results. Just prior to departing for his Hawaiian Christmas escape in December -- amidst roiling controversies suffocating his signature program -- Obama pronounced the law "working." And on Super Bowl Sunday, he assured Bill O'Reilly that Obamacare's much maligned web system is functioning "the way it's supposed to." What to make of these assertions? Is the president so out of touch that he believes them to be true, or is he putting on a brave face to defend an historic technological and policy failure that bears his name? Democrats have made endless promises to the public throughout the healthcare debate, the highest profile of which haven't panned out -- which is why the law remains deeply unpopular. Conservatives predicted nearly every one of these betrayals, often with remarkable precision. The law is a mess that has shattered the well-known pledges upon which was sold. Its authors and defenders lack credibility. And the new policy is hurting real people. What follows is a digestible, but by no means comprehensive, video dissection of Obamacare, using only supporters' words, press accounts, and testimonials from impacted citizens:
Many thanks to my colleagues Emily Bruce, Sarah
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
