The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Flight 370 Industrial Espionage:Voice of Russia Interview with Field McConnell - YouTube
Posted By: VforVictory [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 21-Mar-2014 13:01:39
Date: Friday, 21-Mar-2014 13:01:39
|
Friday, March 21, 2014
Flight 370 Industrial Espionage:Voice of Russia Interview with Field McConnell - YouTube
About MH 370
From: legal_reality
Subj: About MH 370
Subj: About MH 370
21 March A.D. 2014
To participate in the analysis of the event, there's one position that seems far more practical than any other that is being asserted to date, and it's sound enough to pass along.
This is not original with this author. This is, in summary form, an informed line of analysis received here.
The "how." There are two main ways for an aircraft totally to disappear from radar: (1) complete "dustification" (as some argue) or (2) radar jamming equipment (as this author expects is the reality). (Even if we get "James Bond"-ish on the matter, the space ship that hijacked the US and Soviet space capsules was tracked on radar at the moment of the hijacking; it was after that time that tracking was supposedly difficult.)
The only way any aircraft (or boat, etc.) can actually "vanish" from radar while still fully intact is via radar-jamming equipment. Most of the world's contemporary fighter jets, for example, have this capability. To take a commercial airliner "off the radar," there has to be a "net" of radar-jamming technology around the aircraft.
Presuming full preservation of the airliner (as addressed in the "why" section, below), the most likely scenario for accomplishing complete "vanishing" is for there to be at least one radar-jamming aircraft in the vicinity. Whether above, below, in front, or behind, the jamming would have to be in the immediate vicinity of the aircraft intended to be hidden.
Apparently, the satellite connection with the Boeing engines wasn't jammed. The hijackers will know better next time, and don't we know that there are engineers and programmers on that aspect already.
That's the most likely scenario on "how" it was done, namely, at least one other aircraft, with its radar-jamming equipment on, in front, above, behind, or below the airliner.
The "who." Knowing the "how," we then also know the "who." (This is the analytical process applied and insisted upon by Dr. Judy Wood, who has explained to us (to the world) "how" the WTC complex was destroyed, or, more accurately, "dustified." She didn't get into the "who" part, but knowing the "how" tells us the "who.") Clearly, the "who" is "us." Who is "us?" The pro western-european-banking-
The "why." Knowing the "how" and the "who," we get to the "why." On board that flight were at least 20 employees of a technology firm based in Austin, Texas. That firm is gifted in the art of imbedded security technology. Apparently, the Chinese have applied these security measures, so "we're" engaging in "activities" (that the rest of the world would call criminal, and worse) in order to "extract" from these engineers what they know about the technology being used by the Chinese. Thus, it would seem that the western european banking cartel has yet another vulnerability, and they're flexing their arm-of-the-flesh muscle to try to reduce or eliminate that vulnerability.
(One of the values in the cryptic nature of the parables and the prophetic word is that the bad guys are as without direct understanding or discretion in this matter, as Pharaoh was in the beginning. Because they seem not to realize - yet - that they're doing God's bidding here, they just keep on doing their "Beast" thing. They're good; they're very good; as in genius and brilliant. When God raises up a "Beast," He doesn't mess around. But, they're not at any time outside the complete Sovereignty of YAHUWAH. They may still believe that they are exercising free will. They are in for a huge surprise.)
Epilogue. There's no way that any such information extraction process works on "dead" people. So, at least those 20 are assuredly alive. Likely, the entire compliment of passengers and crew are alive, and they'll live out the rest of their days in some US Navy equipped "place," so that they are simply never going to be available as witnesses, as to who did what. Wherever that location may be "today," as of March 8, it started out as Diego Garcia.
To participate in the analysis of the event, there's one position that seems far more practical than any other that is being asserted to date, and it's sound enough to pass along.
This is not original with this author. This is, in summary form, an informed line of analysis received here.
The "how." There are two main ways for an aircraft totally to disappear from radar: (1) complete "dustification" (as some argue) or (2) radar jamming equipment (as this author expects is the reality). (Even if we get "James Bond"-ish on the matter, the space ship that hijacked the US and Soviet space capsules was tracked on radar at the moment of the hijacking; it was after that time that tracking was supposedly difficult.)
The only way any aircraft (or boat, etc.) can actually "vanish" from radar while still fully intact is via radar-jamming equipment. Most of the world's contemporary fighter jets, for example, have this capability. To take a commercial airliner "off the radar," there has to be a "net" of radar-jamming technology around the aircraft.
Presuming full preservation of the airliner (as addressed in the "why" section, below), the most likely scenario for accomplishing complete "vanishing" is for there to be at least one radar-jamming aircraft in the vicinity. Whether above, below, in front, or behind, the jamming would have to be in the immediate vicinity of the aircraft intended to be hidden.
Apparently, the satellite connection with the Boeing engines wasn't jammed. The hijackers will know better next time, and don't we know that there are engineers and programmers on that aspect already.
That's the most likely scenario on "how" it was done, namely, at least one other aircraft, with its radar-jamming equipment on, in front, above, behind, or below the airliner.
The "who." Knowing the "how," we then also know the "who." (This is the analytical process applied and insisted upon by Dr. Judy Wood, who has explained to us (to the world) "how" the WTC complex was destroyed, or, more accurately, "dustified." She didn't get into the "who" part, but knowing the "how" tells us the "who.") Clearly, the "who" is "us." Who is "us?" The pro western-european-banking-
The "why." Knowing the "how" and the "who," we get to the "why." On board that flight were at least 20 employees of a technology firm based in Austin, Texas. That firm is gifted in the art of imbedded security technology. Apparently, the Chinese have applied these security measures, so "we're" engaging in "activities" (that the rest of the world would call criminal, and worse) in order to "extract" from these engineers what they know about the technology being used by the Chinese. Thus, it would seem that the western european banking cartel has yet another vulnerability, and they're flexing their arm-of-the-flesh muscle to try to reduce or eliminate that vulnerability.
(One of the values in the cryptic nature of the parables and the prophetic word is that the bad guys are as without direct understanding or discretion in this matter, as Pharaoh was in the beginning. Because they seem not to realize - yet - that they're doing God's bidding here, they just keep on doing their "Beast" thing. They're good; they're very good; as in genius and brilliant. When God raises up a "Beast," He doesn't mess around. But, they're not at any time outside the complete Sovereignty of YAHUWAH. They may still believe that they are exercising free will. They are in for a huge surprise.)
Epilogue. There's no way that any such information extraction process works on "dead" people. So, at least those 20 are assuredly alive. Likely, the entire compliment of passengers and crew are alive, and they'll live out the rest of their days in some US Navy equipped "place," so that they are simply never going to be available as witnesses, as to who did what. Wherever that location may be "today," as of March 8, it started out as Diego Garcia.
There are a series of studies and reflections on each of the components of this note, and, yes, of course, that information is certainly available for passing along in the form in which it was received here. Those notes apparently had quite some path to take to get out from the authors' location(s).
To add a concept, this whole matter is just one more event in this Money v. "funny money" issue. As Scripture tells us, we know that the "kings of the rising sun" (kings of the east) come across a dried up river (symbolic of spiritual death of Israel) to Israel's rescue. The "dried up river" part is a general indicator of timing. Thus, it matters that we know exactly who and where Israel is, or we'll miss the lesson. To "see" Israel is to recognize God's Judgment, and to recognize the Judgment is to recognize the earthly, physical level of "salvation" in process by which this present "Beast" system is put out of business. The minds in charge of this present "Beast" system are at the top of the political "power" of Israel. Thus, think Crown and the British East India Company. Further, when this "Beast" "goes," so will everything that is built on that same foundation of sinking sand.
Messiah is that "9th Beast" that clobbers the "8th Beast" (which is "Mystery" ("Secret") Babylon, which is, of course, Israel herself, who is also the Whore riding that "Beast"). He raises Himself up as the Final Judge over Israel, being His own iron rod of correction, and He starts in His sanctuary, i.e., at the top of the responsibility lines within Israel (Ez. 8 and 9).
The western european banking cartel folks have got to be desperate, desperate, desperate to want to pull this one off, and this hardly appears to be an act of retreat or concession by that cartel, as some well-known authors in this area would like to have us believe as what's happening at that level. This is a lot closer to an act of war, and it's far more consistent with a "Beast," for we see this very same mendacity in Pharaoh (at the time of the "first" release from a "Beast" system, after which were 40 years in the desert, and then a crossing into the down payment on the Promised Land). What that level of desperation means to us is that the time for the end of the "funny money" is that much closer. The "kings of the east" have to include the greatly libeled and slandered Russian leadership and the Chinese leadership. "All" the controlled media "information" is pro western european banking cartel, so we have to go to other sources to learn more of our present reality.
It's tough to say what will happen to/with the vulnerable assets, e.g., retirement funds, but it's not difficult at all to say that the present "funny money" system is watching its demise develop. The "kings of the east" have no practical desire to torch this marketplace. They sink (destroy) themselves to go in that direction. (Thus, just be mindful that anything untoward on our soil is going to be a false flag event intending to muster support for going after the kings of the east. It won't be the activity of or by the kings of the east. The people are not their target. Their target is the western european banking cartel.) Just the same, to want to see the end of this "Beast" system, which is happening, is to want also to see the end of the "funny money" system. Where one's (financial, etc.) "security" is based on that form of sinking sand, one is going to "feel" the end of the "Beast" system rather directly, in economic terms. There'll be some level of preservation of purchasing power, but there'll likely be an economic hit involved, no matter what else happens.
As for the existing "gotcha agreements" set up under this present "funny money"-based "choice of law," all of those will still be evaluated under that system's evaluation standards. As the "choice of law" changes, and as new "gotcha agreements" are set up, should that choice of law revert back to the Common Law, then the evaluation standard will change (in a preferred direction). A change in evaluation standard in that direction, in and of itself, will provide a measure of relief, and, eventually, it's expected that this entire "gotcha agreement" gambit, indispensable to the western european banking cartel's stranglehold over this nation (and all nations using the "funny money" mechanism), will find its own quiet demise within a reasonably short time period (a decade or two).
Said another way, the event of the Stone's striking the 10 toes (clay mixed with iron, which is a symbolic statement about mixed-race marriages, in particular, and, these days, "mixed" "marriages" of any politically correct type) is likely the same event as the collapsing of this present "Beast" system, for this "Beast" is "us," and where we're "worshiping Baal," in all those various forms, we're still the Whore, and we're still in a "mixed" "marriage" (i.e., worshiping the gods of this world rather than God, i.e., the traditional, even ancient, violation of Rule 1 -- I Am your God, and you shall have no other God).
Even where the "funny money" system is ended, we're still a considerable ways away from practicing those concepts that are consistent with The Kingdom. The kings of the east provide a small measure of relief. They also provide a time marker. As The Kingdom is more formally recognized, there'll definitely be a "hedge," a "wall," within which will be one form/type of life, and outside of which will be another (where there's crying and gnashing of teeth). That "hedge," in reference to The Garden, and that "wall," in reference to the prophetic word, is, of course, a symbol of God's Law. It's the effort to be consistent with God's Law that brings one within the "hedge," within The Garden, and it's the effort to be inconsistent with God's Law that'll keep one outside that "wall," where there's crying and gnashing of teeth.
Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas
Subscribe / unsubscribe : legal_reality@earthlink.net
To add a concept, this whole matter is just one more event in this Money v. "funny money" issue. As Scripture tells us, we know that the "kings of the rising sun" (kings of the east) come across a dried up river (symbolic of spiritual death of Israel) to Israel's rescue. The "dried up river" part is a general indicator of timing. Thus, it matters that we know exactly who and where Israel is, or we'll miss the lesson. To "see" Israel is to recognize God's Judgment, and to recognize the Judgment is to recognize the earthly, physical level of "salvation" in process by which this present "Beast" system is put out of business. The minds in charge of this present "Beast" system are at the top of the political "power" of Israel. Thus, think Crown and the British East India Company. Further, when this "Beast" "goes," so will everything that is built on that same foundation of sinking sand.
Messiah is that "9th Beast" that clobbers the "8th Beast" (which is "Mystery" ("Secret") Babylon, which is, of course, Israel herself, who is also the Whore riding that "Beast"). He raises Himself up as the Final Judge over Israel, being His own iron rod of correction, and He starts in His sanctuary, i.e., at the top of the responsibility lines within Israel (Ez. 8 and 9).
The western european banking cartel folks have got to be desperate, desperate, desperate to want to pull this one off, and this hardly appears to be an act of retreat or concession by that cartel, as some well-known authors in this area would like to have us believe as what's happening at that level. This is a lot closer to an act of war, and it's far more consistent with a "Beast," for we see this very same mendacity in Pharaoh (at the time of the "first" release from a "Beast" system, after which were 40 years in the desert, and then a crossing into the down payment on the Promised Land). What that level of desperation means to us is that the time for the end of the "funny money" is that much closer. The "kings of the east" have to include the greatly libeled and slandered Russian leadership and the Chinese leadership. "All" the controlled media "information" is pro western european banking cartel, so we have to go to other sources to learn more of our present reality.
It's tough to say what will happen to/with the vulnerable assets, e.g., retirement funds, but it's not difficult at all to say that the present "funny money" system is watching its demise develop. The "kings of the east" have no practical desire to torch this marketplace. They sink (destroy) themselves to go in that direction. (Thus, just be mindful that anything untoward on our soil is going to be a false flag event intending to muster support for going after the kings of the east. It won't be the activity of or by the kings of the east. The people are not their target. Their target is the western european banking cartel.) Just the same, to want to see the end of this "Beast" system, which is happening, is to want also to see the end of the "funny money" system. Where one's (financial, etc.) "security" is based on that form of sinking sand, one is going to "feel" the end of the "Beast" system rather directly, in economic terms. There'll be some level of preservation of purchasing power, but there'll likely be an economic hit involved, no matter what else happens.
As for the existing "gotcha agreements" set up under this present "funny money"-based "choice of law," all of those will still be evaluated under that system's evaluation standards. As the "choice of law" changes, and as new "gotcha agreements" are set up, should that choice of law revert back to the Common Law, then the evaluation standard will change (in a preferred direction). A change in evaluation standard in that direction, in and of itself, will provide a measure of relief, and, eventually, it's expected that this entire "gotcha agreement" gambit, indispensable to the western european banking cartel's stranglehold over this nation (and all nations using the "funny money" mechanism), will find its own quiet demise within a reasonably short time period (a decade or two).
Said another way, the event of the Stone's striking the 10 toes (clay mixed with iron, which is a symbolic statement about mixed-race marriages, in particular, and, these days, "mixed" "marriages" of any politically correct type) is likely the same event as the collapsing of this present "Beast" system, for this "Beast" is "us," and where we're "worshiping Baal," in all those various forms, we're still the Whore, and we're still in a "mixed" "marriage" (i.e., worshiping the gods of this world rather than God, i.e., the traditional, even ancient, violation of Rule 1 -- I Am your God, and you shall have no other God).
Even where the "funny money" system is ended, we're still a considerable ways away from practicing those concepts that are consistent with The Kingdom. The kings of the east provide a small measure of relief. They also provide a time marker. As The Kingdom is more formally recognized, there'll definitely be a "hedge," a "wall," within which will be one form/type of life, and outside of which will be another (where there's crying and gnashing of teeth). That "hedge," in reference to The Garden, and that "wall," in reference to the prophetic word, is, of course, a symbol of God's Law. It's the effort to be consistent with God's Law that brings one within the "hedge," within The Garden, and it's the effort to be inconsistent with God's Law that'll keep one outside that "wall," where there's crying and gnashing of teeth.
Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas
Subscribe / unsubscribe : legal_reality@earthlink.net
A Startlingly Simple Theory About the Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet
A Startlingly Simple Theory About the Missing Malaysia Airlines Jet
Chris Goodfellow
There has been a lot of speculation about Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Terrorism, hijacking, meteors. I cannot believe the analysis on CNN; it’s almost disturbing. I tend to look for a simpler explanation, and I find it with the 13,000-foot runway at Pulau Langkawi.
We know the story of MH370: A loaded Boeing 777 departs at midnight from Kuala Lampur, headed to Beijing. A hot night. A heavy aircraft. About an hour out, across the gulf toward Vietnam, the plane goes dark, meaning the transponder and secondary radar tracking go off. Two days later we hear reports that Malaysian military radar (which is a primary radar, meaning the plane is tracked by reflection rather than by transponder interrogation response) has tracked the plane on a southwesterly course back across the Malay Peninsula into the Strait of Malacca.
The left turn is the key here. Zaharie Ahmad Shah1 was a very experienced senior captain with 18,000 hours of flight time. We old pilots were drilled to know what is the closest airport of safe harbor while in cruise. Airports behind us, airports abeam us, and airports ahead of us. They’re always in our head. Always. If something happens, you don’t want to be thinking about what are you going to do–you already know what you are going to do. When I saw that left turn with a direct heading, I instinctively knew he was heading for an airport. He was taking a direct route to Palau Langkawi, a 13,000-foot airstrip with an approach over water and no obstacles. The captain did not turn back to Kuala Lampur because he knew he had 8,000-foot ridges to cross. He knew the terrain was friendlier toward Langkawi, which also was closer.
Take a look at this airport on Google Earth. The pilot did all the right things. He was confronted by some major event onboard that made him make an immediate turn to the closest, safest airport.
The loss of transponders and communications makes perfect sense in a fire.
When I heard this I immediately brought up Google Earth and searched for airports in proximity to the track toward the southwest.
For me, the loss of transponders and communications makes perfect sense in a fire. And there most likely was an electrical fire. In the case of a fire, the first response is to pull the main busses and restore circuits one by one until you have isolated the bad one. If they pulled the busses, the plane would go silent. It probably was a serious event and the flight crew was occupied with controlling the plane and trying to fight the fire. Aviate, navigate, and lastly, communicate is the mantra in such situations.
There are two types of fires. An electrical fire might not be as fast and furious, and there may or may not be incapacitating smoke. However there is the possibility, given the timeline, that there was an overheat on one of the front landing gear tires, it blew on takeoff and started slowly burning. Yes, this happens with underinflated tires. Remember: Heavy plane, hot night, sea level, long-run takeoff. There was a well known accident in Nigeria of a DC8 that had a landing gear fire on takeoff. Once going, a tire fire would produce horrific, incapacitating smoke. Yes, pilots have access to oxygen masks, but this is a no-no with fire. Most have access to a smoke hood with a filter, but this will last only a few minutes depending on the smoke level. (I used to carry one in my flight bag, and I still carry one in my briefcase when I fly.)
What I think happened is the flight crew was overcome by smoke and the plane continued on the heading, probably on George (autopilot), until it ran out of fuel or the fire destroyed the control surfaces and it crashed. You will find it along that route–looking elsewhere is pointless.
Ongoing speculation of a hijacking and/or murder-suicide and that there was a flight engineer on board does not sway me in favor of foul play until I am presented with evidence of foul play.
We know there was a last voice transmission that, from a pilot’s point of view, was entirely normal. “Good night” is customary on a hand-off to a new air traffic control. The “good night” also strongly indicates to me that all was OK on the flight deck. Remember, there are many ways a pilot can communicate distress. A hijack code or even transponder code off by one digit would alert ATC that something was wrong. Every good pilot knows keying an SOS over the mike always is an option. Even three short clicks would raise an alert. So I conclude that at the point of voice transmission all was perceived as well on the flight deck by the pilots.
But things could have been in the process of going wrong, unknown to the pilots.
Evidently the ACARS went inoperative some time before. Disabling the ACARS is not easy, as pointed out. This leads me to believe more in an electrical problem or an electrical fire than a manual shutdown. I suggest the pilots probably were not aware ACARS was not transmitting.
As for the reports of altitude fluctuations, given that this was not transponder-generated data but primary radar at maybe 200 miles, the azimuth readings can be affected by a lot of atmospherics and I would not have high confidence in this being totally reliable. But let’s accept for a minute that the pilot may have ascended to 45,000 feet in a last-ditch effort to quell a fire by seeking the lowest level of oxygen. That is an acceptable scenario. At 45,000 feet, it would be tough to keep this aircraft stable, as the flight envelope is very narrow and loss of control in a stall is entirely possible. The aircraft is at the top of its operational ceiling. The reported rapid rates of descent could have been generated by a stall, followed by a recovery at 25,000 feet. The pilot may even have been diving to extinguish flames.
But going to 45,000 feet in a hijack scenario doesn’t make any good sense to me.
Regarding the additional flying time: On departing Kuala Lampur, Flight 370 would have had fuel for Beijing and an alternate destination, probably Shanghai, plus 45 minutes–say, 8 hours. Maybe more. He burned 20-25 percent in the first hour with takeoff and the climb to cruise. So when the turn was made toward Langkawi, he would have had six hours or more hours worth of fuel. This correlates nicely with the Inmarsat data pings being received until fuel exhaustion.
Fire in an aircraft demands one thing: Get the machine on the ground as soon as possible.
The now known continued flight until time to fuel exhaustion only confirms to me that the crew was incapacitated and the flight continued on deep into the south Indian ocean.
There is no point speculating further until more evidence surfaces, but in the meantime it serves no purpose to malign pilots who well may have been in a struggle to save this aircraft from a fire or other serious mechanical issue. Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah was a hero struggling with an impossible situation trying to get that plane to Langkawi. There is no doubt in my mind. That’s the reason for the turn and direct route. A hijacking would not have made that deliberate left turn with a direct heading for Langkawi. It probably would have weaved around a bit until the hijackers decided where they were taking it.
Surprisingly, none of the reporters, officials, or other pilots interviewed have looked at this from the pilot’s viewpoint: If something went wrong, where would he go? Thanks to Google Earth I spotted Langkawi in about 30 seconds, zoomed in and saw how long the runway was and I just instinctively knew this pilot knew this airport. He had probably flown there many times.
Fire in an aircraft demands one thing: Get the machine on the ground as soon as possible. There are two well-remembered experiences in my memory. The AirCanada DC9 which landed, I believe, in Columbus, Ohio in the 1980s. That pilot delayed descent and bypassed several airports. He didn’t instinctively know the closest airports. He got it on the ground eventually, but lost 30-odd souls. The 1998 crash of Swissair DC-10 off Nova Scotia was another example of heroic pilots. They were 15 minutes out of Halifax but the fire overcame them and they had to ditch in the ocean. They simply ran out of time. That fire incidentally started when the aircraft was about an hour out of Kennedy. Guess what? The transponders and communications were shut off as they pulled the busses.
Get on Google Earth and type in Pulau Langkawi and then look at it in relation to the radar track heading. Two plus two equals four. For me, that is the simple explanation why it turned and headed in that direction. Smart pilot. He just didn’t have the time.
Today's Healthy Recipe - Fish and Chips From the Oven
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Today's Healthy Recipe - Fish and Chips From the Oven
Posted By: Dquixote1217 [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 21-Mar-2014 11:33:47
Date: Friday, 21-Mar-2014 11:33:47
|
3 New Executive Orders Seizing Assets
|
3
New Executive Orders Seizing Assets
|
Reply Quote
Printer
Friendly
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
: there are 3
executive orders pertaining to the Ukraine, Russia,
& US persons in March. The article below is about the 2nd
order and at the bottom is the latest EO dated March 20 ( 3rd order).
So What happens if one has family there or sends money to
family there ? Or is adopting a child from there ?
New
Executive Order: “Obama Has Just Given Himself the Authority to Seize Your
Assets”
Mac Slavo March 19th, 2014 SHTFplan.com
On
Monday the U.S. government took steps to seize the US-based assets of Russian
lawmakers and
anyone else that the US government deemed complicit in
supporting the Crimean secession movement.
We’ve
seen the U.S. government do this in countless cases surrounding drug and
financial crimes, and sometimes even against foreign leaders like Saddam Hussein
and Manuel Noriega.
What
makes this particular instance so unprecedented and terrifying is that
President Obama went so far as to issue a new Executive Order to give himself
the authorization to do so, because the laws of the United States are such that
our government is not allowed to simply take someone’s bank assets, home or
business without due process.
Here’s
the kicker.
The
new Executive Order doesn’t just apply to just Russians or foreigners. It
gets blanket coverage, so even American citizens could now face asset
forfeiture if their actions are deemed to be “contributing to the situation
in the Ukraine.”
Be careful what you say. Be
careful what you write. President Obama has just given himself the authority
to seize your assets.
According
to the president’s recent Executive Order, “Blocking Property of Certain
Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine” (first reported by WND’s
Aaron Klein), the provisions for seizure of property extend to “any United
States person.” That means “any United States citizen, permanent resident
alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any
jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any
person in the United States.”
Via:
The Ron Paul Institute
Like
most Executive Orders and government legalese, the definitions for why an
individual would have their assets seized under this directive are extremely
broad and they could, for all intents and purposes, be used against anyone who
supports Russian interests, or simply argues against those of the United
States.
You
can read the full Executive Order at the White House web site or below. The
key points are noted below:
All
property and interests in property that are in the United States, that
hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within
the possession or control of any United States person (including any foreign
branch) of the following persons are blocked and may not be
transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any
person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the
Secretary of State:
(i)
to be responsible for or complicit in,
or to have engaged in, directly or indirectly, any
of the following:
(A) actions or
policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine;
(B) actions or
policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or
territorial integrity of Ukraine; or
(C)
misappropriation of state assets of Ukraine or of an economically significant
entity in Ukraine
This
new Executive Order has crossed a very dangerous line. It’s one that turns the
notions of property rights and due process upside down by effectively bypassing
the U.S. Constitution.
While
we’re sure the President and his staff would argue that such a law would
never be used against Americans who are protected by free speech, the
fact is that the Executive Branch now believes it has the self-manifested
authority to target any individual who engages in activities that undermine
US interests abroad or at home.
If
a President of the United States believes he has the authority to make it
illegal for you to provide support to Russia by way of political commentary,
charitable donations or other methods, could he also use similar directives
to push forward other agendas?
President Obama has already
re-authorized an E.O. giving him the ability to seize farms, food, processing
plants, energy resources, transportation, and skilled laborers during
national emergency.
The
next Executive Order could come in the form of restrictions on firearms
advocacy or target those who speak out against policies like government
mandated health care. All it would take is the declaration of a national
emergency and they can essentially do as they please.
Is it prudent to give a single
person the ability to force such actions down the throats of the American
people without Congressional oversight or Judicial review?
For
Immediate Release
March
20, 2014
Executive
Order -- Blocking Property of Additional
Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine
EXECUTIVE
ORDER
-
- - - - - -
BLOCKING
PROPERTY OF ADDITIONAL PERSONS CONTRIBUTING TO THE SITUATION IN UKRAINE
By
the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of
the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50
U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States
Code,
I,
BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, hereby expand the scope of the national emergency declared in
Executive Order 13660 of March 6, 2014, and expanded by Executive Order
13661 of March 16, 2014, finding that the actions and policies of
the Government of the Russian Federation, including its purported annexation
of Crimea and its use of force in Ukraine, continue to undermine democratic
processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security,
stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the
misappropriation of its assets, and thereby constitute an unusual and
extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the
United States. Accordingly, I hereby order:
Section
1.
(a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States,
that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come
within the possession or control of any United States person (including
any foreign branch) of the
following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported,
withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of
the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State:
(i)
to operate in such sectors of the Russian Federation economy as may be
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the
Secretary of State, such as financial services, energy, metals and mining,
engineering, and defense and related materiel;
(ii)
to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or
technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any
person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this
order; or
(iii)
to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on
behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in
property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(b)
The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent
provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that
may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract
entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the effective date of
this order.
Sec.
2.
I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the
United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in
section 1(a) of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the
United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as
immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons shall be treated
as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011
(Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council
Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).
Sec.
3.
I hereby determine that
the making of donations of the type of articles
specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any
person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to
section 1 of this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the
national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, and expanded in
Executive Order 13661 and this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as
provided by section 1 of this order.
Sec.
4.
The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include but are not limited to:
(a)
the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by,
to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property
are blocked pursuant to this order; and
(b)
the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services
from any such person.
Sec.
5. (a)
Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or
avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the
prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b)
Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this
order is prohibited.
Sec.
6. For the purposes of this order:
(a)
the term "person" means an individual or entity;
(b)
the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint
venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;
(c) the term "United
States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident
alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any
jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any
person in the United States; and
(d)
the term the "Government of the Russian Federation" means the
Government of the Russian Federation, any political subdivision, agency, or
instrumentality thereof, including the Central Bank of the Russian
Federation, and
any person owned or controlled by, or acting for or on behalf of, the
Government of the Russian Federation.
Sec.
7.
For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked
pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United
States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets
instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken
pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore
determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national
emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, and expanded in Executive Order
13661 and this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or
determination made pursuant to section 1 of this order.
Sec.
8.
The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State,
is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of
rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by
IEEPA, as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The
Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other
officers and agencies of the United States Government consistent with
applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby
directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out
the provisions of this order.
Sec.
9.
This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party
against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its
officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
BARACK
OBAMA
All Rights Reserved, without Prejudice to any of those rights, pursuant to UCC 1-308 and 1-103. America without the U.S. federal corporation |
|
Devvy Kidd -- 36 States Did Not Ratify 17th Amendment - What Will States...
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd522.htm.
All TRUTH! Please read! Send this to your Representatives and
Senators in your State and Federal government! FTG
=
Deep Source #1
Deep Source #1:
INTEL - "Jack Lew was supposed to make the announcement about the new UST NOTES yesterday but backed out. The waiting parties in Reno were to be escorted in and give the order to trigger the new gold-backed currency as well as the Republic with the RV/GCR to follow. The Chinese are outraged Jack Lew didn't make the announcement. Time is running out and the attorneys for whomever are looking into the possibility that the RV can occur without the announcement. The waiting parties in Reno are being told to stand by and be ready."
INTEL - "Jack Lew was supposed to make the announcement about the new UST NOTES yesterday but backed out. The waiting parties in Reno were to be escorted in and give the order to trigger the new gold-backed currency as well as the Republic with the RV/GCR to follow. The Chinese are outraged Jack Lew didn't make the announcement. Time is running out and the attorneys for whomever are looking into the possibility that the RV can occur without the announcement. The waiting parties in Reno are being told to stand by and be ready."
Better Link to Download Keshe files, patents
The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Better Link to Download Keshe files, patents
Posted By: billym [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 21-Mar-2014 09:25:27
Date: Friday, 21-Mar-2014 09:25:27
|
Major Malaysian Madness -- "Missing" Jet had 20 FREQUENCY Experts on board
3/16/2014 --
Major Malaysian Madness --
"Missing" Jet had
20 FREQUENCY Experts on board
Published on Mar 16,
2014
This is the full 2 hour show. Starting by covering Earthquakes,
and the South America Earthquake forecast...... then moving to the
"missing" Malaysian Airliner, with the 20 radio frequency /
microprocessor experts on board. Finishing up explaining the WDS / OPPT
offering money to the world.
Madness as of late in Asia -- from missing airliners near China, and new bases in the Philippines,
Madness as of late in Asia -- from missing airliners near China, and new bases in the Philippines,
to White Dragons, and "new world order" money being
given out to the world.
_________
Freescale Semiconductor confirms 20 employees on board the missing jet:
http://media.freescale.com/phoenix.zh...
Freescale specializes in Radio Frequency Plasma generation, laser exciters,
_________
Freescale Semiconductor confirms 20 employees on board the missing jet:
http://media.freescale.com/phoenix.zh...
Freescale specializes in Radio Frequency Plasma generation, laser exciters,
and HF/VHF/UHF RADAR :
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/s...
More on the RF applications here:
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/s...
On Feb 28, 2014, just a few days before the jet went missing, Freescale announced its
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/s...
More on the RF applications here:
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/s...
On Feb 28, 2014, just a few days before the jet went missing, Freescale announced its
new VERY small microprocessor and semiconductor revolution:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,...
_______
The other part of this broadcast covers the coming "offer" that is being made to the world
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,...
_______
The other part of this broadcast covers the coming "offer" that is being made to the world
on behalf of Indonesia,
Swissindo, the WDS, and the OPPT.
My whole post from Oct. 2013, called "they offered me the world" is here:
http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2013/...
My whole post from Oct. 2013, called "they offered me the world" is here:
http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/2013/...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
