Sesame Pork Ribs

Most Requested Recipes 2014—Presenting a brand-new cookbook to try RISK-FREE! Click here for details! View as web page | Email preferences

Treat yourself to a FREE PREVIEW of Most Requested Recipes 2014 Click here.

Recipes  |   Healthy Eating   |  Casseroles  |  Slow Cooker   | Cooking School  |  Contests  |  Shop

Healthy Slow Cooker Recipes» BBQ Sauce Recipes» Learn More» Sesame Pork Ribs Keep the kitchen cool and have supper ready when you get home with these main dish slow cooker recipes for pork, chicken and beef. Get Recipe» Saucy Pork Chops» Root Beer BBQ Ribs» Barbecued Pork Chop Supper» Slow Cooker Chicken Recipes These chicken dinners have great summery flavor. Contest-Winning Chicken Cacciatore» Lemon Chicken Breasts» Peachy Chicken with Sweet Potatoes» Slow Cooker Beef Recipes These slow-cooked beef dishes are perfect for family dinners or get-togethers with friends. Saucy Italian Roast» Beef Brisket in Beer» Hearty Beef Enchilada» Backyard BBQ Break out your grill, invite some friends over, and throw a backyard bbq with these recipes for grilling, summer salads and sides, potluck desserts and more! Get recipes» Tailgating Recipes Get ready for the big game with these tailgate party recipes! These recipes are sure to be winners whether you head out to the game or throw a party at home. Get recipes» ADVERTISEMENT

Want more Taste of Home? Check us out on these social sites! Facebook Twitter YouTube

RSS Feeds | Email Preferences | Unsubscribe | Privacy Policy | Sign Up

This email was sent to: johnmachaffie@gmail.com Copyright 2014 RDA Enthusiast Brands, LLC All rights reserved. 5400 S. 60th St., P.O. 991 Greendale, WI 53129-0991

Why Lawsuit After Lawsuit?

Sheriffs, and Larry Klayman,

Why is it that We The People MUST FILE a Lawsuit in order to have the Government Comply with the Constitution and the Laws?

That means we MUST Comply with the Unconstitutional Agenda to get our Constitutional Way of thinking, which is NO different than Paying a Bribe to the Mafia!

Law Enforcement Officials are Trained and Ordered to Violate the US Constitution and the Laws therein!

It is Time for You Sheriffs to Mandate the Cities, Counties, and States Comply with the Original Constitutional or We The People will FILE an IMMEDIATE ARREST of those Government Officials.

We Start at the Law Enforcement side, then the Attorneys, and then the Judges.

The Judges ARE Violating the Law EACH AND EVERY time they fine a 'person' or put a 'person' in jail for a NON Constitutional Violation, or Harm to others!

We The People Do NOT need to file a Tort or RICO Lawsuit for the Absolute Violations that a Judge has committed, as they convinced the 'person' that they DID Violate the law and they are a Corporation that is Liable for the Crime committed!

Did ANY of your Deputies arrest a person in which they did NOT have a Complaint and a Warrant for the Arrest of an Individual PRIOR to the Arrest?

A good example is the arrest of a female jogger in which the officer grabbed her arm from behind and took her to the ground for Resisting Arrest!

Is the Charge 'Resisting an Arrest' an Official Charge for which there was NO Charge to Start with?

According to the Courts it is!

It is Also good to Force the Cities, Counties, and States to Remove their Corporations and become Public governments.

Dan

CRYSTAL GRIDS TO CLEAR NEGATIVE ENERGY

Subject: CRYSTAL GRIDS TO CLEAR NEGATIVE ENERGY

8 year old kid builds crystal grids to clear negative energy and explains how it works

			8 year old kid builds crystal grids to clear negative en...
			View on www.youtube.com	Preview by Yahoo

IF THE U.S.A. IS NO LONGER SOVEREIGN, USURPED BY HOSTILE CORPORATE OVERTHROW; CAN IT BE SHE IS NOW SUBJECT TO MARITIME SALVAGE LAWS?

http://www.nesaranetwork.com/2014/05/26/if-the-u-s-a-is-no-longer-sovereign-usurped-by-hostile-corporate-overthrow-can-it-be-she-is-now-subject-to-maritime-salvage-laws/

IF THE U.S.A. IS NO LONGER SOVEREIGN, USURPED BY HOSTILE CORPORATE OVERTHROW; CAN IT BE SHE IS NOW SUBJECT TO MARITIME SALVAGE LAWS?
by: V.K. Durham, CEO
Durham Holding Trust, Tias 12087

THE LAW OF ADMIRALTY (MY OLD SCHOOL BOOK) PUBLISHED BY GRANT GILMORE PROFESSOR OF LAW, YALE and Charles L. Black, Jr. professor of Jurisprudence also Yale, 1957  REFERS TO THE OLD LAW OF THE SEA THE LAW OF MARE JUSTINIAN 11.
  Justinian 11.  The Law of the Sea can take anything in its path as long as there is no thing on land to stop it."

It is for this purpose WE the American People have the Constitution of the united States formerly known as "The Law of the Land"
The Constitution can stop this madness of dismantling the states if there are enough people to have the intestinal fortitude to stand up and stop this madness.  This is what Jami Dimon and the Fed. R. have been up to by participating in those Counterfeit Collateralized US Debt Obligations which is getting banker after banker executed, suicided, hung in nations such as Iran, China, Russia etc., etc., etc.

Americans sit on their rumps watching this as if they were watching a soap opera and not doing one danged thing to protect themselves or their Nation?
They watched the Bundy incident, Ruby Ridge, World Trade Towers and sat silent?

There is an old adage in the Law being "He who acquiesces his/her rights loses them forever."

http://www.nesaranetwork.com/2014/05/26/wherein-lies-the-difference-between-ceo-jami-dimon-and-irans-top-banker-khosravi-who-was-convicted-of-disrupting-the-countrys-economy-through-embezzlement-money-laundering-and-bribery/

Wherein lies  the difference between JP MORGAN CEO Jami Dimon and Iran's top banker Khosravi who was convicted of disrupting the country’s economy through embezzlement, money laundering, and bribery?.

http://nypost.com/2014/05/11/dinged-up-jpmorgan-ceo-may-seek-exit-analysts/

International Convention on Salvage, 1989 (London, 28 April 1989) THE STATES PARTIES TO THE PRESENT CONVENTION, RECOGNIZING the desirability of determining by agreement uniform international rules regarding salvage operations, NOTING that substantial developments, in particular the increased concern for the protection of the environment, have demonstrated the need to review the international rules presently contained in the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law relating to Assistance and Salvage at Sea, done at Brussels, 23 September 1910, CONSCIOUS of the major contribution which efficient and timely salvage operations can make to the safety of vessels and other property in danger and to the protection of the environment, CONVINCED of the need to ensure that adequate incentives are available to persons who undertake salvage operations in respect of vessels and other property in danger, HAVE AGREED as follows: CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 Definitions For the purpose of this Convention: (a) "Salvage operation" means any act or activity undertaken to assist a vessel or any other property in danger in navigable waters or in any other waters whatsoever. (b) "Vessel" means any ship or craft, or any structure capable of navigation. (c) "Property" means any property not permanently and intentionally attached to the shoreline and includes freight at risk. (d) "Damage to the environment" means substantial physical damage to human health or to marine life or resources in coastal or inland waters or areas adjacent thereto, caused by pollution, contamination, fire, explosion or similar major incidents. (e) "Payment" means any reward, remuneration or compensation due under this Convention. (f) "Organization" means the International Maritime Organization. (g) "Secretary-General" means the Secretary-General of the Organization. Article 2 Application of the Convention This Convention shall apply whenever judicial or arbitral proceedings relating to matters dealt with in this Convention are brought in a State Party. Article 3 Platforms and drilling units This Convention shall not apply to fixed or floating platforms or to mobile offshore drilling units when such platforms or units are on location engaged in the exploration, exploitation or production of sea-bed mineral resources. Article 4 State-owned vessels 1. Without prejudice to article 5, this Convention shall not apply to warships or other non-commercial vessels owned or operated by a State and entitled, at the time of salvage operations, to sovereign immunity under generally recognized principles of international law unless that State decides otherwise. 2. Where a State Party decides to apply the Convention to its warships or other vessels described in paragraph 1, it shall notify the Secretary-General thereof specifying the terms and conditions of such application. Article 5 Salvage operations controlled by public authorities 1. This Convention shall not affect any provisions of national law or any international convention relating to salvage operations by or under the control of public authorities. 2. Nevertheless, salvors carrying out such salvage operations shall be entitled to avail themselves of the rights and remedies provided for in this Convention in respect of salvage operations. 3. The extent to which a public authority under a duty to perform salvage operations may avail itself of the rights and remedies provided for in this Convention shall be determined by the law of the State where such authority is situated. Article 6 Salvage contracts 1. This Convention shall apply to any salvage operations save to the extent that a contract otherwise provides expressly or by implication. 2. The master shall have the authority to conclude contracts for salvage operations on behalf of the owner of the vessel. The master or the owner of the vessel shall have the authority to conclude such contracts on behalf of the owner of the property on board the vessel. 3. Nothing in this article shall affect the application of article 7 nor duties to prevent or minimize damage to the environment. Article 7 Annulment and modification of contracts A contract or any terms thereof may be annulled or modified if: (a) the contract has been entered into under undue influence or the influence of danger and its terms are inequitable; or (b) the payment under the contract is in an excessive degree too large or too small for the services actually rendered. CHAPTER II PERFORMANCE OF SALVAGE OPERATIONS Article 8 Duties of the salvor and of the owner and master 1. The salvor shall owe a duty to the owner of the vessel or other property in danger: (a) to carry out the salvage operations with due care; (b) in performing the duty specified in subparagraph (a), to exercise due care to prevent or minimize damage to the environment; (c) whenever circumstances reasonably require, to seek assistance from other salvors; and (d) to accept the intervention of other salvors when reasonably requested to do so by the owner or master of the vessel or other property in danger; provided however that the amount of his reward shall not be prejudiced should it be found that such a request was unreasonable. 2. The owner and master of the vessel or the owner of other property in danger shall owe a duty to the salvor: (a) to co-operate fully with him during the course of the salvage operations; (b) in so doing, to exercise due care to prevent or minimize damage to the environment; and (c) when the vessel or other property has been brought to a place of safety, to accept redelivery when reasonably requested by the salvor to do so. Article 9 Rights of coastal States Nothing in this Convention shall affect the right of the coastal State concerned to take measures in accordance with generally recognized principles of international law to protect its coastline or related interests from pollution or the threat of pollution following upon a maritime casualty or acts relating to such a casualty which may reasonably be expected to result in major harmful consequences, including the right of a coastal State to give directions in relation to salvage operations. Article 10 Duty to render assistance 1. Every master is bound, so far as he can do so without serious danger to his vessel and persons thereon, to render assistance to any person in danger of being lost at sea. 2. The States Parties shall adopt the measures necessary to enforce the duty set out in paragraph 1. 3. The owner of the vessel shall incur no liability for a breach of the duty of the master under paragraph 1. Article 11 Co-operation A State Party shall, whenever regulating or deciding upon matters relating to salvage operations such as admittance to ports of vessels in distress or the provision of facilities to salvors, take into account the need for co-operation between salvors, other interested parties and public authorities in order to ensure the efficient and successful performance of salvage operations for the purpose of saving life or property in danger as well as preventing damage to the environment in general. CHAPTER III RIGHTS OF SALVORS Article 12 Conditions for reward 1. Salvage operations which have had a useful result give right to a reward. 2. Except as otherwise provided, no payment is due under this Convention if the salvage operations have had no useful result. 3. This chapter shall apply, notwithstanding that the salved vessel and the vessel undertaking the salvage operations belong to the same owner. Article 13 Criteria for fixing the reward 1. The reward shall be fixed with a view to encouraging salvage operations, taking into account the following criteria without regard to the order in which they are presented below: (a) the salved value of the vessel and other property; (b) the skill and efforts of the salvors in preventing or minimizing damage to the environment; (c) the measure of success obtained by the salvor; (d) the nature and degree of the danger; (e) the skill and efforts of the salvors in salving the vessel, other property and life; (f) the time used and expenses and losses incurred by the salvors; (g) the risk of liability and other risks run by the salvors or their equipment; (h) the promptness of the services rendered; (i) the availability and use of vessels or other equipment intended for salvage operations; (j) the state of readiness and efficiency of the salvor's equipment and the value thereof. 2. Payment of a reward fixed according to paragraph 1 shall be made by all of the vessel and other property interests in proportion to their respective salved values. However, a State Party may in its national law provide that the payment of a reward has to be made by one of these interests, subject to a right of recourse of this interest against the other interests for their respective shares. Nothing in this article shall prevent any right of defence. 3. The rewards, exclusive of any interest and recoverable legal costs that may be payable thereon, shall not exceed the salved value of the vessel and other property. Article 14 Special compensation 1. If the salvor has carried out salvage operations in respect of a vessel which by itself or its cargo threatened damage to the environment and has failed to earn a reward under article 13 at least equivalent to the special compensation assessable in accordance with this article, he shall be entitled to special compensation from the owner of that vessel equivalent to his expenses as herein defined. 2. If, in the circumstances set out in paragraph 1, the salvor by his salvage operations has prevented or minimized damage to the environment, the special compensation payable by the owner to the salvor under paragraph 1 may be increased up to a maximum of 30% of the expenses incurred by the salvor. However, the tribunal, if it deems it fair and just to do so and bearing in mind the relevant criteria set out in article 13, paragraph 1, may increase such special compensation further, but in no event shall the total increase be more than 100% of the expenses incurred by the salvor. 3. Salvor's expenses for the purpose of paragraphs 1 and 2 means the out-of-pocket expenses reasonably incurred by the salvor in the salvage operation and a fair rate for equipment and personnel actually and reasonably used in the salvage operation, taking into consideration the criteria set out in article 13, paragraph 1(h), (i) and (j). 4. The total special compensation under this article shall be paid only if and to the extent that such compensation is greater than any reward recoverable by the salvor under article 13. 5. If the salvor has been negligent and has thereby failed to prevent or minimize damage to the environment, he may be deprived of the whole or part of any special compensation due under this article. 6. Nothing in this article shall affect any right of recourse on the part of the owner of the vessel. Article 15 Apportionment between salvors 1. The apportionment of a reward under article 13 between salvors shall be made on the basis of the criteria contained in that article. 2. The apportionment between the owner, master and other persons in the service of each salving vessel shall be determined by the law of the flag of that vessel. If the salvage has not been carried out from a vessel, the apportionment shall be determined by the law governing the contract between the salvor and his servants. Article 16 Salvage of persons 1. No remuneration is due from persons whose lives are saved, but nothing in this article shall affect the provisions of national law on this subject. 2. A salvor of human life, who has taken part in the services rendered on the occasion of the accident giving rise to salvage, is entitled to a fair share of the payment awarded to the salvor for salving the vessel or other property or preventing or minimizing damage to the environment. Article 17 Services rendered under existing contracts No payment is due under the provisions of this Convention unless the services rendered exceed what can be reasonably considered as due performance of a contract entered into before the danger arose. Article 18 The effect of salvor's misconduct A salvor may be deprived of the whole or part of the payment due under this Convention to the extent that the salvage operations have become necessary or more difficult because of fault or neglect on his part or if the salvor has been guilty of fraud or other dishonest conduct. Article 19 Prohibition of salvage operations Services rendered notwithstanding the express and reasonable prohibition of the owner or master of the vessel or the owner of any other property in danger which is not and has not been on board the vessel shall not give rise to payment under this Convention. CHAPTER IV CLAIMS AND ACTIONS Article 20 Maritime lien 1. Nothing in this Convention shall affect the salvor's maritime lien under any international convention or national law. 2. The salvor may not enforce his maritime lien when satisfactory security for his claim, including interest and costs, has been duly tendered or provided. Article 21 Duty to provide security 1. Upon the request of the salvor a person liable for a payment due under this Convention shall provide satisfactory security for the claim, including interest and costs of the salvor. 2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1, the owner of the salved vessel shall use his best endeavours to ensure that the owners of the cargo provide satisfactory security for the claims against them including interest and costs before the cargo is released. 3. The salved vessel and other property shall not, without the consent of the salvor, be removed from the port or place at which they first arrive after the completion of the salvage operations until satisfactory security has been put up for the salvor's claim against the relevant vessel or property. Article 22 Interim payment 1. The tribunal having jurisdiction over the claim of the salvor may, by interim decision, order that the salvor shall be paid on account such amount as seems fair and just, and on such terms including terms as to security where appropriate, as may be fair and just according to the circumstances of the case. 2. In the event of an interim payment under this article the security provided under article 21 shall be reduced accordingly. Article 23 Limitation of actions 1. Any action relating to payment under this Convention shall be time-barred if judicial or arbitral proceedings have not been instituted within a period of two years. The limitation period commences on the day on which the salvage operations are terminated. 2. The person against whom a claim is made at any time during the running of the limitation period extend that period by a declaration to the claimant. This period may in the like manner be further extended. 3. An action for indemnity by a person liable may be instituted even after the expiration of the limitation period provided for in the preceding paragraphs, if brought within the time allowed by the law of the State where proceedings are instituted. Article 24 Interest The right of the salvor to interest on any payment due under this Convention shall be determined according to the law of the State in which the tribunal seized of the case is situated. Article 25 State-owned cargoes Unless the State owner consents, no provision of this Convention shall be used as a basis for the seizure, arrest or detention by any legal process of, nor for any proceedings in rem against, non-commercial cargoes owned by a State and entitled, at the time of the salvage operations, to sovereign immunity under generally recognized principles of international law. Article 26 Humanitarian cargoes No provision of this Convention shall be used as a basis for the seizure, arrest or detention of humanitarian cargoes donated by a State, if such State has agreed to pay for salvage services rendered in respect of such humanitarian cargoes. Article 27 Publication of arbitral awards States Parties shall encourage, as far as possible and with the consent of the parties, the publication of arbitral awards made in salvage cases. CHAPTER V FINAL CLAUSES Article 28 Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval and accession 1. This Convention shall be open for signature at the Headquarters of the Organization from 1 July 1989 to 30 June 1990 and shall thereafter remain open for accession. 2. States may express their consent to be bound by this Convention by: (a) signature without reservation as to ratification, acceptance or approval; or (b) signature subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, followed by ratification, acceptance of approval; or (c) accession. 3. Ratification, acceptance, approval or accession shall be effected by the deposit of an instrument to that effect with the Secretary-General. Article 29 Entry into force 1. This Convention shall enter into force one year after the date on which 15 States have expressed their consent to be bound by it. 2. For a State which expresses its consent to be bound by this Convention after the conditions for entry into force thereof have been met, such consent shall take effect one year after the date of expression of such consent. Article 30 Reservations 1. Any State may, at the time of signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, reserve the right not to apply the provisions of this Convention: (a) when the salvage operation takes place in inland waters and all vessels involved are of inland navigation; (b) when the salvage operations take place in inland waters and no vessel is involved; (c) when all interested parties are nationals of that State; (d) when the property involved is maritime cultural property of prehistoric, archaeological or historic interest and is situated on the sea-bed. 2. Reservations made at the time of signature are subject to confirmation upon ratification, acceptance or approval. 3. Any State which has made a reservation to this Convention may withdraw it at any time by means of a notification addressed to the Secretary-General. Such withdrawal shall take effect on the date the notification is received. If the notification states that the withdrawal of a reservation is to take effect on a date specified therein, and such date is later than the date the notification is received by the Secretary-General, the withdrawal shall take effect on such later date. Article 31 Denunciation 1. This Convention may be denounced by any State Party at any time after the expiry of one year from the date on which this Convention enters into force for that State. 2. Denunciation shall be effected by the deposit of an instrument of denunciation with the Secretary-General. 3. A denunciation shall take effect one year, or such longer period as may be specified in the instrument of denunciation, after the receipt of the instrument of denunciation by the Secretary-General. Article 32 Revision and amendment 1. A conference for the purpose of revising or amending this Convention may be convened by the Organization. 2. The Secretary-General shall convene a conference of the States Parties to this Convention for revising or amending the Convention, at the request of eight States Parties, or one fourth of the States Parties, whichever is the higher figure. 3. Any consent to be bound by this Convention expressed after the date of entry into force of an amendment to this Convention shall be deemed to apply to the Convention as amended. Article 33 Depositary 1. This Convention shall be deposited with the Secretary-General. 2. The Secretary-General shall: (a) inform all States which have signed this Convention or acceded thereto, and all Members of the Organization, of: (i) each new signature or deposit of an instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession together with the date thereof; (ii) the date of the entry into force of this Convention; (iii) the deposit of any instrument of denunciation of this Convention together with the date on which it received and the date on which the denunciation takes effect; (iv) any amendment adopted in conformity with article 32; (v) the receipt of any reservation, declaration or notification made under this Convention; (b) transmit certified true copies of this Convention to all States which have signed this Convention or acceded thereto. 3. As soon as this Convention enters into force, a certified true copy thereof shall be transmitted by the Depositary to the Secretary-General of the United Nations for registration and publication in accordance with Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations. Article 34 Languages This Convention is established in a single original in the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish languages, each text being equally authentic. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned being duly authorized by their respective Governments for that purpose have signed this Convention. DONE AT LONDON this twenty-eighth day of April one thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine.

New energy technology moving ahead even as financial chaos deepens

 Green Energy, RumTel, Truth and Republic, World News Add comments

May262014

New energy technology moving ahead even as financial chaos deepens

Last week saw major cabal set-backs in the financial war together with several big moves on the energy front.

On the financial front, former World Bank lawyer Karen Hudes and lawyer Winston Shrout tried to sue the World Bank into returning 1000 tons of gold deposited with it by the government of Japan, according to CIA and Japanese government sources (Ms. Hudes did not answer an e-mail asking for confirmation of this). However, the US Treasury Department, the de facto controllers of the World Bank, refused, saying the gold Japan had deposited with the World Bank was stolen from the dragon family, the sources said.

In any case, the dragon family has not gotten its gold back either, so the fact remains the United States corporate government has stolen all the gold it held in trust for the planet and is bankrupt. The only rational option for the United States is now to bankrupt the corporate government, nationalize the Federal Reserve Board and start issuing greenbacks. The cabal, of course, will use all its power to prevent that from happening so continued financial turbulence is inevitable until the whole structure collapses (more about that below).

On the energy front things are looking much better: it has now become clear that the suppressed energy technology genie is out of the bottle. A major Japanese manufacturer contacted the White Dragon Society last week to say they were going ahead with the production of Tesla Quantum Energy Generators. The WDS has still not been able to test such a device though.

On a different front, a major Japanese government research organization has started, in conjunction with the Pentagon, to manufacture a one meter by two meter sized nuclear reactor that

uses so-called spent nuclear fuel rods and is capable of generating 50,000 megawatts (enough for a city), according to a senior researcher. The devices will be built on US military bases to prevent cabal interference, he said. The US Navy will start by using them in submarines and battleships, he said.
This move coincides with the announcement of a successful attempt by the US navy to create aviation and rocket fuel out of sea-water using electricity generated by a nuclear power plant.

http://www.voanews.com/content/us-navy-lab-turns-seawater-into-fuel/1919512.html

It also turns out that Tokyo Gas has already begun marketing fuel cells that provide houses with both heating and electricity. The official Tokyo Gas website says these fuel cells run on natural gas but Japanese government sources say the electricity is generated by extracting hydrogen from water.

http://home.tokyo-gas.co.jp/enefarm_special/enefarm/structure_detail.html

The other big move in the energy sector was the announcement by newly elected Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that every household in India will have solar power by 2019. Modi, who is banned from entering the US by the cabal, is definitely not going to go along with the cabal on many other issues, not just solar power.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/05/20/3439254/india-prime-minister-modi-solar/

If India can do it, so can the rest of the world. If the US had a real government, most US houses could also be solar powered within 5 years. No matter what though, with both China and India now going full speed ahead with solar power, the oil and gas industries can no longer keep the price of solar panels artificially high.

The oil and gas industry also saw some big changes come to light last week. The biggest was the announcement by the US Energy Information Administration that US shale oil reserves were only about 30% of what was previously talked about.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-22/us-shale-oil-miracle-disappears

This means any US talk of replacing Russia as a supplier of gas to Europe is just talk. In this context, Lord Peter Mandelson, described by MI5 as a representative of the Rothschild family, cited US (non-existent) shale oil as part of his backing for a public threat to “freeze Russia out of the global financial system.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10850249/Lord-Mandelson-sees-looming-nightmare-for-Russian-economy-despite-gas-deal.html

In specific, he threatened that $700 billion worth of Russian corporate external debt would “not be rolled over.” This is pure bluff. According to the MI5 source, the UK has also been vastly exaggerating its shale gas reserves. It is also clear that it is the Rothschilds, not Russia, who are being frozen out.

The $400 billion gas deal Russia announced with China last week means that even if Europe decided to shoot itself in the foot and stop buying Russian gas, Russia has found other customers.

What is really at stake here is Rothschild and cabal control over the Western financial system.

Here the situation is coming to a head over the Ukraine because Russia is asking for the Ukraine to start paying for its Russian gas with cash starting in June. Ukraine does not have the money. There is talk of the IMF providing Ukraine with the money but the IMF, a cabal construct, does not have money or gold either. Ukraine’s new president has already said he will talk directly with Russia over this issue without Western input. Nor is he likely to agree to hand over Ukraine’s resources to Western oligarchs.

Other cabal money grabs are also being foiled. The monarchist military coup in Thailand last week means the attempt by the cabal to steal the gold belonging to the Thai royal family as well as the Persian gold stored in Thailand via rogue CIA manipulated “redshirts” has been stopped.

We also found out last week what US corporate president Obama was up to when he visited Japan earlier this month. According to Japanese government sources, he tried to steal most of the money that had been set aside for the reconstruction of Fukushima.

A Chinese government source confirmed this and said the Americans (cabal) had offered to sell most of the real estate in Fukushima, as well as energy production facilities there, to Chinese companies. The Chinese were also offered a chance to buy some Japanese media conglomerates, he said. With allies like that, Japan does not need enemies.

Obama also tried once again to cash the fake Kennedy bonds while in Asia, this time through the South Koreans, the Chinese source said.

This is the context in which the attempt by Karen Hudes to get Japanese gold out of the World Bank took place.

We have also heard from MI6 sources in Asia that US Vice President Biden has been secretly offering to sell Hawaii to the Chinese in an attempt to keep the US corporate government solvent.

Speaking about Hawaii, so-called Hawaiian born President Obama was in Afghanistan this weekend where he made a speech where he kept to the fiction that the 911 attacks originated in Afghanistan. Are there actually still people out there who believe that? The fact he refers to the 911 lie is proof that he is complicit in that attack.

What is it going to take to get the US military to march into Washington and arrest these crooks? Why are they still allowed to carry out terror attacks and lie to the world? We are hearing, once again, that things are coming to a head. Let us make it so.

Things are coming to a head in Europe too. The EU elections last week showed anti-EU parties winning in the UK, France, Denmark, Greece and elsewhere. This reflects widespread dissatisfaction with the Bilderberger/Nazi EU project. The Germans, who have been subsidizing most of these countries, may decide to link forces with Russia in an effort to get their idea of a unified Europe back on track.

The Germans have already refused to go along with cabal attempts to use the manufactured crisis in the Ukraine to isolate Russia. They may now take things one step forward and join with the BRICS nations to isolate the Nazi regimes in the US, the UK and other Western countries.

The White Dragon plan is unfolding according to schedule. The end of cabal rule is a mathematical certainty.

Source:  http://hipknowsys.blogspot.com/