JANUARY 9, 2015 AT 10:27 PM Thanks for sharing the link. We all have
valuable contributions to make here. In regards to a solution, I’ve
offered mine here many times, but unfortunately it’s not the one people
want to hear.
Any system, or correction to an existing system,
including change through revolution, is manifested from the hearts and
minds of man. And until those hearts and minds balance and work in
unison, the dysfunction and corruption (of all processes) will continue.
The same cycle will continue for ten thousand more years. Wanting or
desiring a “mosquito coast” lifestyle does not mean that lifestyle will
not be altered or corrupted from outside forces, never mind the corrupt
forces which exist within each of us.
JC Collins Continues:
Therein lays the challenge for humanity, separation and sameness are
one and same. And yet, we wait for separation to offer us a solution to a
problem which lives in each one of us, whether you acknowledge it or
not.
In the
meantime, I will continue to research and write about the mechanics of
the multilateral transition, with a spattering of the esoteric when I
can, with the intent of building understanding about the patterns that
continue to repeat throughout human history.
Those that wish to run headfirst into the same wall of human
dysfunction and despair are only building the horror of tomorrow, as the
outcome of every revolution in human history has proven.
irrelevant111
JANUARY 10, 2015 AT 9:12 PM Mr. Collins, You are most assuredly one
that absorbs w/o comment until a persuasive rebuttal. A fine line…
I challenge nothing. It is common mans understanding to determine truth
based on belief and perception, most certainly knowledge of where we
are today. Most citizens in the U.S. have a blind eye.
It is disheartening daily the lack of “street smarts” on world events.
Blogs such as yours opens eyes as well as other venues to those that see…
Enjoy the dynamic of change in 2015, it will be profound and nothing more… Best My Dear Friends As We Journey On… John
Daneackerman
JANUARY 9, 2015 AT 9:37 PM “France calls for Russian sanctions to be
lifted and 2 days later suffers a terrorist attack on “freedom of
expression”. Interesting.”
And a little damage control…..”U.S. investigating depth of Al Qaeda group’s ties to attack in France”
http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-france-attack-terrorist-group-20150109-story.html matt (@speedspirit42) JANUARY 10, 2015 AT 1:41 AM Here is bit of info on terror attacks pointing fingers at Britain and US intel.
“Indeed,
evidence is already coming to the surface, indicating a clear British
hand behind the terrorist attacks in Paris. On Thursday night, the Daily
Telegraph revealed clear links between one of the Paris attackers and
Abu Hamza, a longtime jihad recruiter based out of the Finsbury Park
Mosque in London. Abu
Hamza was convicted in a US Federal Court last year of terrorism
sponsorship, but in his trial, his defense was that he was working on
behalf of MI5, Britain’s equivalent of the FBI. The
same desperation driving the new wave of 9/11-style terrorism is also
driving Congressional Republican leaders to bend to Wall Street’s
demands for immediate guarantees of unlimited taxpayer bailout of their
totally bankrupt financial bubble. At
the same time, they are also, as Lyndon LaRouche warned, pressing for
vicious austerity measures targeted at America’s poorest and most
vulnerable citizens—through cuts in Food Stamps, Social Security
Disability and Veterans benefits. This is one and the same as the
British policy of radical population reduction. ” LaRouche
Roger Parness
JANUARY 10, 2015 AT 3:53 AM Nuclear power is supported by brain dead
businessmen and predator politicians with zero concern for life and the
future.
To include
renewable energy with nuclear is to display simply and clearly a level
of ignorance intent on destroying our children’s world. Ravenous greed
predominates. Life not profit. NO NUKES!
Dripfood JANUARY 10, 2015 AT 1:37 PM Hello Roger, as you know, I am a proponent of the development nuclear energy technology.
I hope you will believe that my proponency is rooted in research and
consequent knowledge about the subject and not in the least in greed or
hate against your (nor my own) children.
I am quite sure your current view will soften by researching the
following topics: breeder reactor, thorium reactor, LENR (the new and
politically correct word for cold fusion) and fusion reactor.
The technology should be given a fair chance and funding proportionate
to its positive promise for humanity: small (personal), cheap and
zero-footprint nuclear energy devices are within reach.
Associating nuclear energy production with nukes or Tjernobyl is a
result of fierce CSI programming, initiated in the early 1970’s by oil
interests and continuing today. As you know, CSI is meant to evoke
emotional reactions based on misdirection. If you remove the
misdirection, the emotional reaction wll subside.
tristero888 JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 12:04 AM fusion not fission
irrelevant111 JANUARY 10, 2015 AT 9:27 PM P.S. JC, most will not understand “Mosquitos Coast”, unless they saw it…
JC Collins
JANUARY 10, 2015 AT 10:25 PM I know. I have a habit of referencing
things without explaining them in more detail. Perhaps its laziness on
my part.
Matt McBride (@MattMhmmcbride)
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 12:04 AM Dear all, Attached is a link to
Christopher Wilkies 2012 book ‘Special Drawing Rights (SDRs): The first
international money’.
Definitely worth a read in conjunction with JCs posts.
LINK Matt McBride
(@MattMhmmcbride) JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 12:50 AM Hi JC, Do you see
Sauds losing US protection against their internal and external enemies
with a transition away from the petrodollar toward the SDR?
JC Collins
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 1:01 AM Yes, I do Matt. I tend to go against the
grain, so where most see a Saudi-American operation against Russia,
Iran, etc, to drop oil prices,
I see it more as the efforts of Saud and China, with the purpose of
fragmenting OPEC along the subduction zone which exists between low cost
and high cost producers.
This will build the case for international regulation of the energy
markets and a shift towards SDR denomination. What better way to get the
world to accept SDR than by requiring all exchanges of energy to be
denominated in the SDR. Just like happened with the petrodollar.
And the threats made against Saudi Arabia last summer by USD support
group ISIS is seldom mentioned in the analysis of the currently
streaming theory.
Matt McBride
(@MattMhmmcbride) JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 2:18 AM Agreed. Sauds and
China are pushing along the SDR system with the fracturing of OPEC, and
stand to benefit greatly by picking up the broken pieces for cents in
the dollar…or should I say cents in the SDR.
I wonder what “deal” or guarantee the Saudis got from China/Russia/Iran.
It seems the U.S. could be scapegoating the Sauds Citigroup:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-01-05/citi-next-aig-70-trillion-reasons-why-citigroup-and-congress-scrambled-pass-swaps-pu
Do you see a war as an engineered way to accomplish further SDR
expansion, accelerated global growth and wealth redistribution to the
emerging markets of the East post the end of SDR substitution
reliquification in 2015? The eventual peace treaty could usher in the
third stage of the plan.
JC Collins
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 3:35 AM I don’t see anything outside of the
continuation of proxy wars. The mass movement of gold is forced by all
out large warfare. The gold has been willingly moved this time. Proxy
resource wars is the strategy for a diminishing USD industry and
military. At least I hope so.
Norman Ball
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 1:14 AM just a note to say I’m unable to post to
your blog. I wonder if others are having a similar problem. Date: Thu, 8
Jan 2015 19:45:20
JC Collins JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 1:20 AM I’m also having a few issues over the last few days. Not sure what’s causing it.
Roger Parness
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 5:52 AM Me too. Can’t post from work where I
usually do so. Figure y’all miss my acerbic wit and brilliant insights.
Norman Ball
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 1:21 AM Hah lol. I see from the above that you can
post directly from email alerts. Interesting. So I was going to say…
“Do you see Saudis losing US protection against their internal and
external enemies with a transition away from the petrodollar toward the
SDR?” My take Matt is that the petrodollar is a mobius strip.
The US mlitary is financed by the petrodollar which protects the Gulf
states which finances the US military which is protected by the US
military. How do you dismantle a mobius strip?
Btw, the petrodollar peaked in 2006. Cheaper oil also reduces the efficacy of the petrodollar shield.
The Gulf will be a net importer of capital in 2015. Pax Americana is
losing its underwriter. Who’s going to feed the military industrial
complex? WW3? If it’s no longer paid to protect it must destroy.***
My perennial struggle is with intentionality and purposefulness versus
crap just rolling down the hill forming an ever-growing snowball. Are
the motives benign? Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Benign motives can easily devolve into malign intent. Only a fool
wouldn’t be nervous about having to get a home loan approved by Basel,
Switzerland.
Is
the world staggering upwards through monumental greed or is this a
directed rendezvous with a Dodd-Frank derivative *** complete with
depositor wealth confiscation?
How much of the solution is the Plan and how much of the solution is
necessitated by our venal nature? Does it matter if we and They bumble
us into a dystopia?
What’s the practical difference if it turns out to be an accidental dystopia?
Is the BIS catching us so we won’t fall like an attentive parent or
does the BIS know that if it only waits it can catch us before we fall
and make the whole escapade look like an attentive parent catching a
wayward child, when in fact we are collapsing into a centuries-old trap?
Should we welcome our captors because our greed is destroying the planet?
One of the funny things about gold-bugs is they salivate over
$15,000/oz not realizing the dire context in which such an appreciation
will occur.
Would
you rather live in American society today at $1,200/oz or get a windfall
and ‘enjoy’ it in Mad Max land? $15,000/oz gold suggests to me that a
trip to 7-11 has a 50/50 chance of getting you shot, even before you can
hand a gold nugget to the attendant for a Slurpee. Whee! Happy days!
You don’t get that kind of price in Shangri La.
Matt McBride (@MattMhmmcbride) JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 2:29 AM Hi Norman Thanks for the reply.
I agree that gold bugs are kidding themselves thinking prices will go to $15,000 per ounce.
I do believe however that the IMFs existing gold reserves will be
critical to ensuring confidence in the masses of created SDRs.
It would also make sense for the IMF to include gold in the SDR, with
countries like China (with excess gold reserves) substituting Gold for
SDRs and votes…further strengthening the IMFs gold reserves, and ability
to expand the liquidity of the SDR in the multi national corporate and
commercial banking sphere.
The IMF HQ would have to be in Chinas FTZ for the PBOC to be happy to do that.
http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/0212gt_schenk1.pdf chuc1997 JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 3:05 PM Gold at $15,000 is entirely possible.
Money is determined by what oil says it is, end of discussion. That is why US has scrambled to increase its production.
If Saudi, Russia and China say oil trade between them will be settled
at 200 barrels per ounce of gold, who will deny their ability to do so?
This may sound irrational because it prices gold at $10,000/oz, but is it irrational?
Or is it irrational to sell oil for the IOU’s of a broke country or the
“super-IOU’s” of the monetary authority that broke country created
post-WWII and forced other nations to listen too but then won’t listen
to when it came time for the broke country to take it’s own medicine?
Gold at $15,000 will not require mad max, I assure you. Merely a
well-timed “leak” noting that partners russia and China and Saudi are
now settling oil trade in gold at 200 bbls/oz or more.
JC Collins
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 3:42 PM The IMF was not created by the United
States, nor was the USD reserve system. The were used by a larger
international banking conglomerate, which included China and Russia. We
haven’t lived in a US dominated world for the last 70 years, it only
appears that way.
We have lived in a supra-soveriegn banking structure which used the USD system and American military to expand its reach.
Now this same supra-sovereign banking structure is transitioning from a
USD reserve system to a SDR reserve system. Gold will play a hand, as
it did in the original Bretton Woods, but not as a full gold standard.
How would you address the inherent depreciation which has been a
direct result of every gold standard? Logistically, the idea of using
gold to balance world trade is unworkable on so many levels.
The freight and storage alone would drive systemic cost over runs.
Using paper gold certificates instead of moving actual gold just brings
the whole system back into the potential of manipulation and
dysfunction. Saudi, Russia, and China have all committed to the
multilateral monetary framework.
These facts are conveniently left out of analysts that conclude $10,000 gold is just around the corner.
Some regional agreements may temporarily use gold to balance while the
SDR system continues to be arranged and implemented, but you will never
see it as the global reserve unit of account.
Bruno de Landevoisin
JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 1:41 PM I trust the monetary authorities setting
up the The Multilateral System are more competent than the current
authorities handling terrorist apprehension operations:
http://zirpqe.wordpress.com/2015/01/11/curious-charlie-carnage/ Steve Henningsen (@Stevephenni) JANUARY 11, 2015 AT 5:21 PM Strike this comment if already forwarded to you…
I found this interesting…
http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/economist-2015-cover-filled-cryptic-symbols-dire-predictions/ Would love to have been in the Economists editing room while they were developing it.
