Roger Stone Annihilates Hillary!

 

This Information Needs To Get Out! 

Our Future Depends On It! 

Roger Stone Annihilates Hillary!

Published on Oct 6, 2016

 

I have a 22 year old daughter and when I was working on this video I thought, should I let her see it? The answer is yes. Hillary and Bill need to be exposed. The Clintons are two of the most corrupt people on the planet. Everyone remembers the end of the first debate when Trump said “I was going to say something so hard against your family and I just can’t do it”.

Hillary tried to bait Trump into exploding and showing he was a hair trigger candidate. Trump didn’t take the bait, but he did fire a shot across the bowel that if Hillary ever broached this topic again he would unleash the fires of hell upon her! His Campaign has greased the skids to do exactly that. His surrogates have been addressing the issue of Hillary’s feminist platform. Just so happens that the best surrogate of them all for this issue is a female judge.

I saw Judge Jeanine on Friday night with Hannity saying that she was going to trash Comey. I taped the show Saturday at 9:00pm and it turns out that instead of trashing Comey she went after Hillary as an anti-feminist. This was the Judges last Opening statement before the second debate and she decided to focus on Hillary not Comey. You may or may not know that Jeanine and Donald are long time friends. Do you think they didn’t talk about this? Of course they did.

She is the one that said in the next debate Trump has to rip into Hillary on the feminist issue. Hillary claims to be the champion of women’s rights! Consider this. Trumps best shot at acquiring additional votes is to target the millennial female undecided voters. There are at least to generations of millennials that don’t know the names Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Eileen Wellstone, Helen Dowdy, Connie Hamzy, and others.

The media has shut down the fact that Hillary has been an enabler of a sexual predator for over thirty years. When she is running her campaign as a champion of women’s rights and the greatest feminist of all time, this information has to be exposed! The last 6 minutes in the video is the full Clinton testimony!! She was not appointed , she made the decision to take this case. She was not a public defender. Also she flew to New York to get expert testimony. None of this passes the smell test!

Clinton hacked Document from Gucifer 2.0 threatening Limabugh

FR:

SL:

Here we go again.

After all of his crazy antics, I bet you thought that Rush Limbaugh couldn’t outdo himself. But he has.

During a discussion on the topic of sexual assault, Rush Limbaugh asserted on his radio program yesterday that sometimes “No means yes.”

“ Seduction used to be an art, now of course it's "brutish" and it's "predatory" ... [According to Ohio State policy,] consent must be freely given, can be withdrawn anytime, and the absence of "no" does not mean "yes." How many guys, in your own experience with women, have learned that no means yes if you know how to spot it? ... Are these [policies] not lawsuits waiting to happen? ” -- Rush Limbaugh, yesterday

It’s time to show him that no means no, and we will not tolerate this blatant acceptance of violence against women.

Demand Rush Limbaugh’s sponsors pull their advertising from his program >>>

[PETITION BOX]

We just celebrated the 20^th anniversary of the Violence Against Women Act, yet there are still some people that just don’t get it. We need to make sure comments like this do not undermine the progress we’ve made.

If you don’t want to let Rush’s tolerance of sexual assault spread, please, sign our petition asking advertisers to pull their sponsorship.

Rush may not respond to moral outcry, but he will respond to the loss of corporate sponsorship.

Comments like these establish a dangerous precedent of accepting rape culture, and it needs to end now.

Let’s team up to show Rush that America will not stand for this sort of hatred.

Are you in?

Thank you for your support,

DCCC

Soros’s Hacked Memos Are Chilling

Hacked Memos From George Soros’s Open Society Foundation Are                                       Chilling

 

More than 2,500 files from the raft of organizations run by billionaire George Soros have been leaked by hackers.

 

Submitted by IWB, on October 1 2016

by Pamela Williams
 
After viewing some of the hacked memos from George Soros’s Open Society Foundation, I am chilled to the bone. I feel radical Islam is the worst evil our society is fighting, and it seems to be growing. Terrorism is on the rise, and Islamist refugees keep pouring into our Country. We simply do not seem to be making any progress when it comes to curtailing Islamic violence.

ADVERTISEMENT

x

Our own President supports Islamic terrorism, as he will not even admit it exists. I believe he is a closet Muslim himself. He keeps bringing in all the Muslim refugees he can, and we do not have a proper vetting process.

The United States is wide open to exploitation by George Soros.  After reading some of the following hacked memos from the Soros Foundation, you will see who we are truly fighting against. You will see if Hillary Clinton becomes our new President, it might as well be George Soros.  Soros has complete control of the Democratic Party.  Follow the money and read the following article.  You will see what we are up against.

One December 3, 2015 document, titled “Aftermath of ISIS attacks,” outlined a network of grantees that immediately sprung to action pushing specific policy agendas immediately after the December 2, 2015 terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California.

“Anticipating a backlash against Muslims, advocates swung into high gear,” the memo relates.  The grantee actions included attacks on those who spoke against immigration from Islamic countries, a push for gun control, and a speech by Attorney General Lynch at the annual dinner of a grantee, Muslim Advocates.

Meanwhile, another document titled, “ISIS Attacks Aftermath” and dated November 17, 2015, lamented that “Tuesday brought a more concerted effort to push back against efforts fueled by key leaders in Congress and governors in over half the states to bar Syrian refugees from resettlement in whole swaths of the U.S.”

According to that memo, among the prescriptions from grantees was:

- Cities United for Immigration Action, a coalition of nearly 100 mayors, municipalities and counties organized by New York City’s Bill de Blasio, sought to counter the wave of governors opposed to allowing in Syrian refugees with a message of welcome and inclusion. “We should not close our borders to any group of people fleeing the atrocities and horrors of terrorism,” said Mayor de Blasio. 

Yet another document listing grantee response to Islamic State attacks, dated January 7, 2016, addressed grantee opposition activism to the domestic surveillance of Muslims. The actions, the document states, included a lawsuit “contesting the NYPD’s surveillance of Muslims in New Jersey, brought by grantees Muslim Advocates and the Center for Constitutional Rights.”

 Soros hacked 

Thousands of Open Society Foundations files released online

READ MORE: http://on.rt.com/7mmn

https://counterjihadreport.com/2016/09/30/hacked-memos-george-soros-network-hyped-islamophobia-after-muslim-terror-attacks/

THIS IS THE END ——- TREASON

Podesta Wikileaks Email – THIS IS THE END ——- TREASON

Submitted by IWB, on October 8th, 2016 

 

 

From:john.podesta

 

Putting on all of your radars that Grassley sent a letter to AG Lynch (dated June 30th though we just saw it) asking questions about contributions to the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium One deal. Letter is attached. Craig is connecting with comms team to be sure they are aware as well.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/286

The Podesta Emails-Wikileaks.zip DOWNLOAD!!!

 

Hillary Secret Speeches Excerpts and More.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/document/326817206/Hillary-Secret-Speeches-Excerpts-and-More-pdf
HRC Paid Speeches Flags.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/document/326817207/HRC-Paid-Speeches-Flags-pdf
The Podesta Emails Index.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/document/326817218/The-Podesta-Emails-Index-pdf

August 2016 – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the chairman of the U.S. Senate’s Judiciary Committee, has launched a probe into why the Department of Justice shut down efforts by federal law enforcement agents to investigate the Clinton Foundation.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/15/senate-judiciary-committee-launches-probe-justice-departments-decision-let-clinton-foundation-off-hook/
http://freebeacon.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-latest-clinton-foundation-scandals-explained/
Anyone needing to catch up, read this Q&A
Here’s more:
According to an article in today’s New York Times, some of these contributions involve Uranium One, a Canadian uranium mining company that was taken over by the Rosatom, the Russian atomic energy agency.  The Uranium One takeover gave Russia control of one-fifth of U.S. uranium production and advanced Russian President Vladimir Putin’s goal of controlling most of the global uranium supply chain.

Because uranium is considered a U.S. strategic asset with implications for national security, this deal had to be approved by a several U.S. government agencies, including the State Department.  According to the Times article, while the Russians were gradually assuming control of Uranium One from 2009 to 2013, the Uranium One chairman used his family foundation to make $2.35 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation.  The Times article states that “those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clinton’s, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors.”

According to an April 18  Newsweek article, the Clinton Foundation also accepted donations from a firm that was violating nuclear trade sanctions against Iran.  Interpipe, a Cyprus-incorporated company owned by Ukrainian oligarch Victor Pinchuk, sold oil pipelines to Iran in 2011 and 2012 in violation of U.S. sanctions but was not sanctioned for these sales while Clinton was Secretary of State.  

Fox News host Megyn Kelly reported last night on “The Kelly File” that between 2009 and 2013, Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation.  Kelly reported that Pinchuk also pledged more than $20 million more to the foundation.

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/04/23/did-the-clintons-greed-endanger-u-s-national-security/

Clinton Foundation “Largest unprosecuted charity fraud ever attempted” Cumulative May Exceed $100 BILLION 

  
Charles Ortel bio, B.A. from Yale, MBA from Harvard Business School. He previously worked as a Managing Director at investment bank Dillon Read and later as a Managing Director at the financial research firm, Newport Value Partners.

In a 9-page letter dated yesterday and posted to his blog, Ortel calls the Clintons’ charity the “largest unprosecuted charity fraud ever attempted,” adding for good measure that the Clinton Foundation is part of an “international charity fraud network whose entire cumulative scale (counting inflows and outflows) approaches and may even exceed $100 billion, measured from 1997 forward.” Ortel lists 40 potential areas of fraud or wrongdoing that he plans to expose over the coming days.
http://charlesortel.com/

VIDEO Trump: “Corrupt” Hillary Clinton Signed Off On Uranium Deal That Benefited Russia
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/09/01/trump_corrupt_hillary_clinton_signed_off_uranium_deal_that_benefited_russia.html

CLINTON: But, at the State Department we were attacked every hour, more than once an hour by incoming efforts to penetrate everything we had. And that was true across the U.S. government. And we knew it was going on when I would go to China, or I would go to Russia, we would leave all of our electronic equipment on the plane, with the batteries out, because this is a new frontier. And they’re trying to find out not just about what we do in our government. They’re trying to find out about what a lot of companies do and they were going after the personal emails of people who worked in the State Department. So it’s not like the only government in the world that is doing anything is the United States. But, the United States compared to a number of our competitors is the only government in the world with any kind of safeguards, any kind of checks and balances. They may in many respects need to be strengthened and people need to be reassured, and they need to have their protections embodied in law. But, I think turning over a lot of that material intentionally or unintentionally, because of the way it can be drained, gave all kinds of information not only to big countries, but to networks and terrorist groups, and the like. So I have a hard time thinking that somebody who is a champion of privacy and liberty has taken refuge in Russia under Putin’s authority. And then he calls into a Putin talk show and says, President Putin, do you spy on people? And President Putin says, well, from one intelligence professional to another, of course not. Oh, thank you so much. I mean, really, I don’t know. I have a hard time following it. [Clinton Speech At UConn, 4/23/14]
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/927

Greatest Fraud in US History

Clinton Foundation – Greatest Fraud in US History

Published on Sep 10, 2016

Good morning, I’m still reporting on the Clintons.
This is some of the most startling information I’ve ever come across. Please listen carefully.
Primary investigators of the Clinton Foundation say it’s really Robin Hood in reverse. The foundation steals money from programs supposedly for the poor and has pocketed at least $100 billion.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

 

Marshal's Round Table 10

Good Day,

On Tuesday October 11, 2016

Please join us for our tenth (10th) Continental Marshals Round-Table Discussion to be held every Tuesday night, at the following times:
8pm - Eastern
7pm - Central
6pm - Mountain
5pm - Pacific
4pm - Alaska
2pm - Hawaii

This meeting will be hosted by Marshal Tresa Haywood and last approximately 2 hours. Discussion focused mainly on the role and responsibilities of our Continental, De Jure Marshals.
Topics of discussion may include:
*Marshal Screening Process
*Oath-Taking and Filing Procedures
*Judicial, Juror and Courthouse Security
*Fugitive Operations
*Prisoner Operations/ Security and Transportation
*Witness Security/Protection
*Service of Court Process
*Tactical Operations
*Property/Asset Seizures
*Proper Identification
* and other related topics and concerns
There will be a voting process to establish unity within the Marshals as a whole.

To join this Round-Table discussion, please use the folliwing call-in number and access code:
Phone Number: 712-775-7035
Access Code: 141013#
Thank you, and may all your days be blessed!

Sincerely,
Marshal Tresa Haywood
Email: bellahaywood@gmail.com

BOOM! Trump Tells Hillary: ‘If I win, I will appoint special prosecutor to investigate you’

"You’d be in jail" if I were prez, he says

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump made one of his most forceful attacks at the second US presidential debate when he told Hillary Clinton he would assign a special prosecutor to investigate her email scandal.

Clinton: "Good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law."

Trump: "Because you'd be in jail."#debate pic.twitter.com/eCuP4ZkYem
— New York Times Video (@nytvideo) October 10, 2016

And I’ll tell you what, I didn’t think I’d say this, but I’m going to say it and I hate to say it, but if I win i’m going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation because there’s never been so many lies, so much deception, there’s never been anything like it. And we’re going to have a special prosecutor.
When I speak, the people of this country are furious. In my opinion the people that have been long term workers at the FBI are furious. There has never been anything like this where emails, and you get a subpoena. You get a subpoena and after getting the subpoena you delete 33,000 emails and then you acid wash them or bleach them – a very expensive process.
So we’re going to get a special prosecutor and we’re going to look into it because people have been, their lives have been destroyed for doing one fifth of what you’ve done and it’s a disgrace. And honestly you ought to be ashamed of yourself.

After claiming Trump’s statement contained various lies, Hillary said, “You know it’s just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in this country.”
“Because you’d be in jail,” Trump shot back quickly.

HRC: "It's good that someone w/ the temperament of #DonaldTrump is not in charge of the law in our country."
Trump: "B/c you'd be in jail." pic.twitter.com/Evpy2bKZ9J

— Fox News (@FoxNews) October 10, 2016

Turkey's Coup Plotters are Members of NATO's Rapid Deployable

Turkey's Coup Plotters

are Members of NATO's Rapid Deployable

Published on Jul 24, 2016

The three most important regiments involved in the Turkey Attempted Coup plot and implementation have been part (members) of NATO’s Rapid Deployable Corps (NRDC) since 2003.

A group of plotters of the failed Turkish Coup Attempt used a WhatsApp group to communicate with each other. Based on well-documented information and established identities gathered from these intercepted communications, at least three out of the five coupist regiments were (and still are) part of NATO’s Rapid Deployable Corps. Further, the group used the emblem and slogan used by NATO’s Rapid Deployable Corps: “Peace at home, peace in the world.”

The intercepted communications also expose the role of the CIA-Gulen network within Turkey’s police force, and how it readily welcomed and aided the Failed Coup Attempt.

Newsbud news with Sibel Edmonds and Spiro Skouras delves into this significant exposé and provides viewers with context and analyses missing from western media outlets.

 

[apfn-1] "Robin Hood In Reverse": Clinton Foundation “Largest unprosecuted charity fraud ever attempted” Cumulative May Exceed $100 BILLION

Pls review attachments, Thank you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZMdbZuGTxA

Published on Sep 10, 2016

Good morning, I’m Still reporting on the Clintons.

This is some of the most startling information I’ve ever come across. Please listen carefully.

Primary investigators of the Clinton Foundation say it’s really Robin Hood in reverse.

The foundation steals money from programs supposedly for the poor and has pocketed at least $100 billion.

I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.

http://investmentwatchblog.com/podesta-wikileaks-email-this-is-the-end-treason/

Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, Civil RICO: 18 U.S.C. 1964;

Agent of the United States as Qui Tam Relator (4X),

Federal Civil False Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. 3729 et seq.

http://supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm

All Rights Reserved (cf. UCC 1-308 https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/1/1-308)

Attachments:

• chapter17-wanta-black-swan-white-hat-.pdf (1.3 MB)
• federal_reserve_bank_of_richmond_may_2006_1_.pdf (2.1 MB)
•  
•  

Nuclear-armed drones? They may be closer than you think

The US military increasingly relies on drones to carry out a multitude of tasks, usually those deemed too “dull, dirty, or dangerous” for manned missions. Most unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) carry out routine reconnaissance. They also act as decoys, serve as communication relays, and even deliver light cargoes. But a growing number of drones are armed, such as the US Predator and MQ-9 Reaper, which are used mostly in tactical situations, such as targeting terrorists or insurgents.

Now military strategists are considering acquiring longer-range drones, especially those capable of carrying out nuclear missions. In 2015 there were reports that Russia was attempting to build nuclear-armed drone submarines.
It is a controversial strategy, given that it takes all the usual qualms there are about the increasing use of autonomous systems for war-fighting – the ethics of devolving too much authority to what are basically robots, susceptibility to hacking, etc. – but with much greater destructive power, given these systems’ range and payload. Nevertheless, it is at least worth considering.

The DailyBrief

 

In fact, such a strategic drone may already be in the offing. When the US decided to go ahead with a next-generation strategic bomber, the Long-Range Strike Bomber (LRS-B), the program included both manned and unmanned systems. The LRS-B, which replaces both B-52 and B-1 bombers, is intended to carry out a broad range of missions: nuclear attack, strategic and tactical conventional strike, surveillance, intelligence, and reconnaissance (ISR), and electronic attack. Initially, the US military plans to acquire 80 to 100 LRS-Bs, but the number could eventually rise to 200 bombers.

 

Some of these missions probably do not require a manned system, and thus a drone version of the LRS-B could perform many of the more mundane tasks, such as ISR or electronic attack, without putting unnecessary stress on crews.
Conventional strike missions with precision-guided air-to-ground munitions is also something that could be considered for an unmanned system, as it would provide the US with the means for long-range, large-payload ground attacks. These types of missions can presently be carried out only by B-52 and B-1 bombers, which are becoming increasingly obsolete; shorter-range systems such as the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, area very limited in their capacities for ground attack.

In such a role, an unmanned LRS-B could probably pack quite a lethal load and avoid putting a manned crew in harm’s way.

More controversial, perhaps, is the idea of an unmanned version of the LRS-B delivering nuclear weapons. Of course, the US military already operates a number of unmanned nuclear-delivery systems; they are called ballistic missiles (think of them as a single-mission, one-way drone).

Nevertheless, nuclear-armed drones still raise considerable hackles. What if such a drone could be hacked and forced to crash or be redirected to another target? How does the drone’s remote operator ensure near-total control of such a lethal weapons platform?

And nuclear drones could come in smaller packages, too. Thus far there have been limitations on the transportability by air of nuclear bombs with relatively high yields.

One of the goals of a nuclear weapons designer is to achieve the optimum yield-to-weight ratio – that is, the amount of bang per mass, usually expressed in terms of kilotons per kilogram (kt/kg). And thus far, we have needed powerful airplanes and missiles to deliver such explosive capability (compared to conventional warheads) in such relatively small amounts of weight compared to the amount of conventional warheads we would need to achieve the same destructive power.

But the technology of additive manufacturing may diminish this problem. At least in theory. Additive manufacturing – where 3-D printing machines can build objects of any shape and size by laying down successive layers of material – brings new opportunities for building much more lightweight structures.
A structure can be built with the needed strength but can be considerably lighter than a conventionally-built counterpart. One approach, for instance, is to build a lattice structure of different chemical components – either for the delivery system or the bomb casing itself, since the mass of plutonium or uranium itself cannot be modified.

More lightweight nuclear weapons present new deployment and delivery opportunities. They could be much more furtive and more difficult to detect; they could be carried by small drones and therefore be much harder to detect by enemy air defenses, since an adversary would normally be expecting a ballistic or cruise missile, or a bomber.

Longer-range drones make a lot of sense for the US military, when it comes to projecting power into the far Western Pacific. It still suffers from the centuries-old challenge of the “tyranny of distance.” It can take up to three weeks for US naval forces to steam from ports on the west coast to the South China Sea. Forces based in Hawaii could take up to 16 days to reach this area, and even Guam is a 3- to 5-day journey away. Considering this strategic straight jacket, drones make a lot of sense.

A nuclear-armed UAV may not be on the horizon any time soon, but it is a certainty that longer-range armed drones are coming, and perhaps sooner than we think. The promise of such a system, and the strike options it offers, are going to be just too irresistible to pass up.

Especially for the US military, which is seeking so-called “third offsets” capabilities in order to redress its growing vulnerability to long-range strike by such potential adversaries like China, a strategic drone would probably be quite appealing.