Hillary Clinton moves $1.8 Billion To Qatar - Planning escape possibly?

Hillary Clinton’s “Sudden Move” Of $1.8 Billion To Qatar Central Bank Stuns Financial World

An intriguing Ministry of Finance (MoF) report circulating in the Kremlin today says that elite Western bankers were “stunned/bewildered” a few hours ago after the Bank For International Settlements (BIS) registered a $1.8 billion transfer from the Clinton Foundation (CF) to the Qatar Central Bank (QCB) through the “facilitation/abatment” of JP Morgan Chase & Company (JPM)—and for reasons yet to be firmly established. 

Hillary Clinton (left) with Qatari Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabor Al (right)

According to this report, the Bank for International Settlements is the world's oldest international financial organization and acts as a prime counterparty for central banks in their financial transactions; the Qatar Central Bank is the bank of that Gulf State nations government and their “bank of banks”; JP Morgan Chase & Company is the United States largest “megabank”; and the Clinton Foundation is an international criminal money laundering organization whose clients include the Russian mafia.  

With Hillary Clinton’s US presidential campaign Chairman John Podesta having longstanding ties to the Russian mafia and money laundering, this report continues, the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) maintains “complete/all times/all ways” surveillance of him and his criminal associates—including both Hillary Clinton and her husband, and former US President, Bill Clinton, and who are collectively designated as the “Clinton Crime Family”. 

On Saturday 15 October (2016) the SVR reported to the MoF that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta met with JP Morgan Chase & Company CEO Jamie Dimon at Clinton’s Chappaqua Compound outside of New York City—and who, in 2009, both 'president' Obama and Hillary Clinton allowed to break US laws by his, Dimon’s, being able to buy millions-of-dollars of his company’s stocks prior to the public being told his JP Morgan bank was receiving a Federal Reserve $80 billion credit line—and that caused JP Morgan’s stocks to soar and that have had an astonishing 920% dividend growth since 2010. 

Within 12 hours of the Hillary Clinton-John Podesta- Jamie Dimon meeting at the Chappaqua Compound,  the BIS registered the transfer of $1.8 billion from the Clinton Foundation to the Qatar Central Bank.

To why the Clinton Foundation transferred this enormous sum of money to Qatar is due to the long standing ties between this Islamic neo-patrimonial absolute monarchy and then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who “oversaw/managed” the “massive bribery scheme” that allowed this Gulf State nation to secure the 2022 World Cup—and that the Qataris were so appreciative of they donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. 

Incredibly, in 2011, gave former US President Bill Clinton $1 million for a birthday present bringing Hillary Clinton’s total “cash grab” from these Persian Gulf sheiks of $100 million, all occurring as recently released secret emails revealed Hillary Clinton’s knowledge that both Qatar and Saudi Arabia were, and still are, funding ISIS.

To what Jamie Dimon “related/said to” Hillary Clinton that caused her to suddenly transfer $1.8 billion to Qatar revolves around his JP Morgan bank being told by the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in April (2016) that this “megabanks” master plan to save itself had “serious deficiencies” that could “pose serious adverse effects to the financial stability of the United States”.   

Two months after the FDIC’s warning letter to Jamie Dimon in June (2016), he cryptically “sounded a warning” that the United States sub-prime auto loan bubble was nearing collapse and stated that “someone is going to get hurt”.

Unbeknownst to the American people is that just 8 weeks ago multiple warnings began to be issued that the United States $1 trillion sub-prime auto loan bubble was beginning to collapse, and that this past week became so severe the Bank of America issued a recession warning telling its 'elite' customers that “this market is scary”, and the British-based multinational banking and financial services company HSBC likewise issued a “Red Alert” warning all of its clients warning them to “prepare for a severe market crash”. 

With one of the first “victims/casualties” of this sub- prime auto loan bubble being the German global banking giant Deutsche Bank that is “nearing its doom” and laying off tens-of-thousands of it workers worldwide, the American mainstream propaganda media is failing to allow the people of that nation to know the full extent of this looming catastrophe who, unlike Hillary Clinton who has just protected $1.8 billion of her wealth, will be left defenseless once again at the hands of their 'elite' rulers.  

As Wikileaks secret Hillary Clinton emails have now proven that the US propaganda mainstream media is now totally controlled by her, and who continue their blackout on the “Clinton Crime Story of the Century”,  the absolutely horrifying statistics released this week showing that an astounding 35% of Americans who have been brutalized by the Obama-Clinton regime these past 8 years are so buried in debt they can no longer pay their bills is, likewise, being kept from these most innocent of peoples. 

  BREAKING: VIDEO SHOWING BILL CLINTON 

RAPING 13 YR-OLD 

WILL PLUNGE RACE INTO CHAOS 

ANONYMOUS CLAIMS

And rather than the US propaganda mainstream media warning the American people of their economies looming destruction they have, instead, begun a “systemic mainstream misinformation” campaign to manipulate the presidential election polls showing Hillary Clinton leading but that stands opposed to actual (but unreported) polls showing Donald Trump leading.

Critical Note: A highly classified SVR amendment to this MoF report states that upon Qatar receiving Hillary Clinton’s $1.8 billion earlier today, one of that sheikdoms royal places was “ordered emptied” in preparation for the “early November arrival” of a “high value” dignitary—Hillary Clinton perhaps?  

October 16, 2016
Sorcha Faal
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2141.htm 

Barack & Michelle - Reptilian Monsters

Barack & Michelle Reveal Reptilian "Baggage" at London Airport (Part 1)

By Ken Adachi, Editor
Barack & Michelle Reveal Reptilian "Baggage" at London Airport (April 15, 2009)
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/obamareptilianlondonbaggage15apr09.shtml#top
April 15, 2009

I posted a story on September 16, 2008 titled Photographic Evidence that Barack Obama is a Human/Reptilian Hybrid, Part 1 in which  I enlarged a black and white photo of 10 year old Barry Soetoro (a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama) sitting on a bench next to his claimed mother, Stanley Ann (Dunham) Soetore and her then husband, Lolo Soetoro. The Truth Media Ministry distributed this photo widely over the Internet and in newspapers on behalf of the Rockefeller campaign planners to show us what Barack looked like as a young boy. Don Nicoloff discovered that the photo was originally a color photo, but was de-saturated of color in order to make it appear black and white. Don was able to reintroduce the original colors by driving up an attribute of color photography called "gamma" gain. After reintroducing color into that shot, Don noticed that a number of anomalies in the photo became more apparent and called me to talk about it. 

(http://educate-yourself.org/cn/baracksoetorofamilyphoto16sep08.shtml)

By greatly enlarging the bare knees, forearms, and hands of 10 year old Barack, I could see many unusual images of alien-looking and animal-like creatures. I titled the article Part 1 because I still have many other enlarged photo crops to post including his knees, between his legs, from the wall behind him, from Lolo Soetoro, and even from Stanley Ann's body, showing similar manifestations of alien-like creatures.

After posting the article, I received e-mails from a few people tipping me off to other Internet posted photos of young Barack which may reveal reptilian anomalies, but I haven't had the chance yet to study those photos in detail using PhotoShop.

Fast forward to April 11, 2009, and I received this e-mail from Sonya:

Subject: Obama Reptilian Eyes
From: Sonya
Date: Sat, April 11, 2009
To: Ken A

Hi Ken,

I wanted to send you a picture I saw of the Obamas' arrival in London. Instead of the standard "red eye" that can be expected from a camera's flash; both of the Obamas are captured with "reptilian eyes". I would like to send the picture to you. I'm going to include the link with the hope the picture opens. I found the picture on US Magazine's web site of all places.

http://www.usmagazine.com/photos/michelle-obamas-european-style?slideshow_id=1074&o=1

-Sonya

---------

Here's the photo that Sonya was referring to. There is likely a bulletproof glass or a plastic

shield in front of the photographer who took the shot. I'm only guessing, but I see reflections of shinny objects in the lower right of this photo, adjacent to Barack's left leg, that makes me think that the photo was taken looking through a see-through shield.

When this photo was greatly enlarged, cropped, and contrast enhanced, I could find numerous entities in the faces of both Michelle and Barack, as well as stunning etheric images on Michelle's legs. There are also entities manifesting on Michelle's dress, as well as the light colored background of the plane's door and the interior.

It's possible that the see-through shield through which the photo was taken (assuming there was a shield), allowed the reptilian images to appear in starker contrast on the photo (which was likely a digital photo; also known to more easily capture etheric images than film photography).

Since Sonya was initially impressed by the strange appearance of the Obamas' eyes, I thought we could start our little exploratory journey there with enlarged crops of their eyes and them move on to the images seen on Michelle's legs and on their faces. For the eye crops, you will notice that there is only black seen in what should be the white sclera of Michelle's eyes. The strange silvery, whitish band seen where the pupils should be, could be partially (or mostly) due to reflected light from the see-through shield or it could be a manifestation of "reptilian eyes" as Sonya had conjectured. I don't really know the answer, but the etheric manifestations seen on their bodies and in their auras and the surrounding space adjacent to them are undeniable and incredible in detail.

David Icke and others have reported that a partial manifestation of reptilian features have been observed when human/reptilian hybrids allow their eyes to manifest as solid black, instead of the normal appearance of a sclera, iris, and pupil. David Icke witnessed this phenomena himself while sitting in a television studio makeup chair right next to former British Prime Minister Edward Heath. They were alone in the makeup room and David was attempting to engage Sir Heath is light conversation, when suddenly Heath turned to look at David and Heath's eyes turned solid black. He didn't say a word to David while this was taking place, but only starred at him for a moment or two before looking away. Needless to say, David lost all interest in trying to engage the former Prime Minister in conversational banter.

Michelle's Eyes

The reflection of artificial lighting is clearly seen in the central portion of the eye, but is the white banding adjacent to this reflected light also a light reflection, or is it a reptilian manifestation? 

Barack's Eyes

Reflected artificial light is more obvious in Barack's eyes and he shows much less white 'banding' than Michelle. You'll also notice that you can see a small corner of white sclera in both his left and right eye.  However, you also see much more black in what should be the white outer sclera of the left eye. The images you see adjacent to his nose and the outer eye area give you some hint of the large number of entities manifesting on his face (shown in Part 3).

Michelle's Right Leg                                                                                                                                              Crop A

Both of Michelle's legs were manifesting numerous etheric images with the most striking seen in the area of her knees, such as this lovely creature (seen on the right) peering out from the inner thigh area of her right leg. If you look carefully at the full leg crop seen on the left, you can see this entity on her inner thigh just below her skirt. To examine a much larger magnification of the crop of Michelle's right leg, click this link (Michelle R leg full 900w at London airport 2248.jpg)

The etheric image seen below, which is centered over her right kneecap, appears to be a single entity when viewed at the smaller magnification seen on the left, but when enlarged and contrast enhanced, it reveals itself to be more than one image. Most manifestation of reptilian entities tend to show 'entities within entities'. The "eye" of one entity will seem to share the same "eye" of another entity, for example.

                                    
Crop A2  Central kneecap of right leg
The crop seen below marked A4 is taken from the outer portion of the right leg from just below the kneecap to about the mid-shin area. The image looks very faint and barely discernable in the above full right leg photo, but will reveal itself in greater detail when magnified and adjusted for enhanced contrast, brightness, color saturation, or shifts in hue. I drew a white separator line between the upper and lower images and then further contrast enhanced each image so you could more easily recognize the details in each. The upper image, A4A, seems to show two entities, one looking to its left and the other purple-ish looking entity looking right, in almost full profile. The lower entity seems to have teeth and a major goiter problem in its left eye. 

A4                                                                                   

                                             

Crop H    

The green fellow (below) on the right was taken from the white background of the plane's door, adjacent to Michelle's right leg, about mid-shin level. You can see it if you carefully look at the right leg full leg crop photo shown (to the left here) above, about mid-shin level. After cropping this image, I simply increased the contrast to allow the image to stand out with greater relief.

The ghostly looking entity of the left was taken from the inner shin area of the right leg, about midway between her kneecap and her ankle.

There are many more entities on Michelle's right leg beyond the few that I've posted here. Anyone who has a photo-editing program such as PhotoShop can download the orginal image posted at US Magazine (and above) and crop these images yourself.  





            Crop AW

                              
             Crop J

Crop J seen on the left reveals an entity that may have horns protruding from its forehead area, but I'm not sure. This crop is taken from the inner shin area about halfway between the ghostly entity seen in Crop H and her ankle 

Crop K (below) on the right is the lowest image seen manifesting on the right leg shin, just above the ankle. It almost looks like a dog with its head canted, or you might see it as two heads sharing the same "eye".

                                                       Crop K
 

Etheric Images Seen on Plane's Fuselage in the Lower Right

Crop A

The photo on the left is a cropped enlargement from the original photo (above) without contrast enhancement. The silvery looking rod-like structure is probably a reflection of the handrail of the de-boarding stairway. The contrast enhancement of the middle photo shows greater detail of the lower etheric image, but also reveals multiple etheric images in the tan/brown area just above the lower entity. The photo on the right has even more contrast applied with a reduction in color saturation to see the lower entity in greater relief. I've enlarged the tan/brown area below to full screen width so you can more easily see the etheric images there.

Crop B

By increasing the contrast and magnifying the crop, it's easier to spot the etheric images. I've cropped out a few of these images and posted them below this panel.

Shown below are enlarged crops taken from the above panel: Subcrops A, B, C, and D 

A    

  














B

C 

D

Subcrop E                                                                                                                                       

The  image on the left is a skull-like image that shows up in many enlargements of etheric manifestations.

The "double" heads seen (below) on the right appear to be sharing a central "eye". A common aspect of these image manifestations is the blending and melding of 'images within images' as mentioned above. Note, however, that the color of each "head" remains separate and does not blend or bleed, one into the other.

           

                                     Subcrop F

If you have PhotoShop, you can see the word "Images" in the upper Menu bar. After clicking "Images", you will get a drop down menu that includes the word "Adjustment" This is the tab I use most often to enhance contrast and intensify faint content. You can click the "Image Size" tab (under the "Images" Menu bar) and adjust the magnification to any size desired.

There are limits, however, as the image becomes more de-focused and pixilated as you increase the magnificiation.

I'll post more enhanced crops from Michelle's left leg in Part 2 and from the faces of both Obamas, which are loaded with etheric images.

I realize that some people find this information extremely hard to believe and a few self-proclaimed "experts" in PhotoShop have accused me of magnifying "low resolution noise", but "noise" does not organize itself into fully symetrical, highly defined, highly detailed, gargoyle-like, demonic-looking entities with eyes, nose, cheeks, teeth, jaw lines, horns, and crowns.

However, human-looking reptilian aliens, capable of masking their reptilian appearance by drinking enough human blood loaded with adrenalchrome obtained from terrorized sacrificial victims, can and do manifest etheric entity images under certain conditions or special circumstances.

It's possible that the Obama's human-appearance "masking ability" had decrease following fatigue from the long flight to London, or perhaps they needed to be "fed" again to re-establish the full cloaking obtained with human blood/ adrenalchrome.

to be continued...

Ken Adachi

All cropped, magnified, and contrast enhanced images shown above are Copyright 2009 to Ken Adachi and www.educate-yourself.org . All Rights Reserved. Use without permission and full attribution is strictly prohibited

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/obamareptilianlondonbaggage15apr09.shtml

 

Hillary's False Flag Uncovered, US Elections in Peril!

11

Here Are Hillary Clinton's Three Speeches To Goldman Sachs For Which She Was Paid $675,000

As has been widely reported, in 2013 Hillary Clinton was paid $675,000 for three speeches to Goldman Sachs.  One was delivered on June 4, 2013 at the 2013 IBD CEO Annual Conference at The Inn at Palmetto Bluff in South Carolina, a second one took place on October 24, 2013 at the Goldman Sachs Asset Management AIMS Alternative Investment Symposium, and the last one was delivered on October 29, 2013 at the Goldman Sachs builders and innovators summit.

The speech transcripts, in their entirety, were revealed for the first time in an email from Tony Carrk, research director at Hillary for America, in an email dated January 23, 2016, and disclosed to the public for the first time ever during today's latest Wikileak of Podesta emails.
In the email Carrk says:

The 3 (I misspoke about 5 earlier) speeches to Goldman are attached with
some parts highlighted. Below are some of the more noteworthy quotes.

The highlights Carrk refers to are the following:
In the first excerpt Hillary Clinton (rightfully) mocks Dodd Frank as nothing but a political contrivance which was created solely for political reasons as "there was also a need to do something because for political reasons." To wit: "*Clinton Said, With Dodd-Frank, There Was “A Need To Do Something Because For Political Reasons” Because Members Of Congress “Can't Sit Idly By And Do Nothing.”

“And with political people, again, I would say the same thing, you know, there was a lot of complaining about Dodd-Frank, but there was also a need to do something because for political reasons, if you were an elected member of Congress and people in your constituency were losing jobs and shutting businesses and everybody in the press is saying it's all the fault of Wall Street, you can't sit idly by and do nothing, but what you do is really important.” [GS2, 10/24/13]

* * *
In the second highlighted excerpt, Tim O'Neill, Global Co-Head of the Investment Management Division, thanks Hillary for her "continued involvement in the issues (inaudible) to be courageous in some respects to associated with Wall Street and this environment" and then thanks her "very much."
*Tim O’Neill Told Clinton “We Really Did Appreciate It” When She Had Been “Courageous In Some Respects To Associated With Wall Street And This Environment.”

“MR. O'NEILL: By the way, we really did appreciate when you were the senator from New York and your continued involvement in the issues (inaudible) to be courageous in some respects to associated with Wall Street and this environment. Thank you very much. SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I don't feel particularly courageous. I mean, if we're going to be an effective, efficient economy, we need to have all part of that engine running well, and that includes Wall Street and Main Street. And there's a big disconnect and a lot of confusion right now. So I'm not interested in, you know, turning the clock back or pointing fingers, but I am interested in trying to figure out how we come together to chart a better way forward and one that will restore confidence in, you know, small and medium-size businesses and consumers and begin to chip away at the unemployment rate. So it's something that I, you know, if you're a realist, you know that people have different roles to play in politics, economics, and this is an important role, but I do think that there has to be an understanding of how what happens here on Wall Street has such broad consequences not just for the domestic but the global economy, so more thought has to be given to the process and transactions and regulations so that we don't kill or maim what works, but we concentrate on the most effective way of moving forward with the brainpower and the financial power that exists here.” [GS2, 10/24/13]

* * *
In a third noted excerpt, Clinton pitches the idea that the best regulation of Wall Street is self-regulation because "the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.”
*Speaking About Financial Regulations, Clinton Said “The People That Know The Industry Better Than Anybody Are The People Who Work In The Industry.”

“There's nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too little is bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we figure out what works? And the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people who work in the industry.” [GS2, 10/24/13]

* * *
In a fourth excerpt, Hillary admits she had "great relations and worked so close together" with Wall Street and has "a lot of respect for the work you do and the people who do it."
*Clinton Said “I Represented All Of You For Eight Years. I Had Great Relations And Worked So Close Together After 9/11 To Rebuild Downtown.”

*“I represented all of you for eight years. I had great relations and worked so close together after 9/11 to rebuild downtown, and a lot of respect for the work you do and the people who do it, but I do -- I think that when we talk about the regulators and the politicians, the economic consequences of bad decisions back in '08, you know, were devastating, and they had repercussions throughout the world.” [GS2, 10/24/13]

The fifth and final highlighted excerpt blames banks' unwillingness to "do what they need to do" due to fear of regulations, the same regulations which in the same speech she said should be left to Wall Street.
*Clinton Said “Banks Are Not Doing What They Need To Do Because They're Scared Of Regulations, They're Scared Of The Other Shoe Dropping.”

*“I mean, right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they're scared of regulations, they're scared of the other shoe dropping, they're just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to to restart economic growth. So people are, you know, a little -- they're still uncertain, and they're uncertain both because they don't know what might come next in terms of regulations, but they're also uncertain because of changes in a global economy that we're only beginning to take hold of.” [GS2, 10/24/13]

* * *
Addtionally, as flagged by Reuters earlier, in the June 4 Goldman Sachs speech, Hillary warned Beijing it would "ring China with missile defense" unless it did more to rein in North Korea's missile program.

Because they could not only do damage to our treaty allies, namely Japan and South Korea, but they could actually reach Hawaii and the west coast theoretically, and we're going to ring China with missile defense. We're going to put more of our fleet in the area.

Clinton told Goldman that the message to China had been, "You either control them, or we're going to have to defend against them."  According to Reuters, the State Department on Friday declined to comment on "alleged leaked documents." When asked whether such a message had been delivered to China, an official said it was not department policy to comment publicly on diplomatic discussions. Although Clinton's reported comments raised a stir in Asia, Reuters adds.
Clinton said she also told her Chinese counterparts that the United States had as much a claim to the Pacific as China, given that U.S. forces had liberated it in World War Two.
China had "a right to assert themselves," but the United States needed to "push back to create a balance" to prevent China taking a chokehold on sea lanes and countries bordering the South China Sea, she said.
* * *
Clinton gives yet another confirmation that Saudi Arabia and the Emirates are funding the "Jihadis" in Syria, aka the Islamic State:

If you look at what's happening in Syria, it's clearly a multiply leveled proxy battle. We've got Iran with their agents in Hezbollah, and they're being taken on by indigenous rebels but increasingly a collection of Jihadists who are funded by the Saudis, funded by the Emiratis, funded by Qatar, and you have the Turks that were very active in the beginning, but then began to be concerned by some of the development inside Syria, particularly among the northern and northeastern Kurdish population in Syria.

Here are some interesting thoughts on Syria from June 2013, in which she herself admitted that a no fly zone in Syria would "kill a lot of Syrians."

So let's just take a step back and look at the situation that we currently have in Syria. When -- before the uprising started in Syria it was clear that you had a minority government running with the Alawites in lead with mostly the other minority groups -- Christians, the Druze, some significant Sunni business leaders. But it was clearly a minority that sat on top of a majority. And the uprisings when they began were fairly mild in terms of what they were asking for, and Assad very well could have in my view bought them off with some cosmetic changes that would not have resulted in what we have seen over the now two years and the hundred thousand deaths and the destabilization that is going on in Lebanon, in Jordan, even in Turkey, and the threat throwing to Israel and the kind of pitched battle in Iran well supported by Russia, Saudi, Jordanians and others trying to equip the majority Sunni fighters.

I think that we have tried very hard over the last two years to use the diplomatic tools that were available to us and to try to convince, first of all, the Russians that they were helping to create a situation that could not help but become more chaotic, because the longer Assad was able to hold out and then to move offensively against the rebels, the more likely it was that the rebels would turn into what Assad has called them, terrorists, and well equipped and bringing in Al-Qaeda and its affiliates.

The Russian's view of this is very different. I mean, who conceives Syria as the same way he sees Chechnya? You know, you have to support toughness and absolute merciless reactions in order to drive the opposition down to be strangled, and you can't give an inch to them and you have to be willing to do what Assad basically has been willing to do.

That has been their position. It pretty much remains their position, and it is a position that has led to the restocking of sophisticated weapon systems all through this. The Russians' view is that if we provide enough weapons to Assad and if Assad is able to maintain control over most of the country, including the coastal areas where our naval base is, that's fine with us. Because you will have internal fighting still with the Kurds and with the Sunnis on the spectrum of extremism. But if we can keep our base and we can keep Assad in the titular position of running the country, that reflects well on us because we will demonstrate that we are back in the Middle East. Maybe in a ruthless way, but a way that from their perspective, the Russian perspective, Arabs will understand.

So the problem for the US and the Europeans has been from the very beginning: What is it you -- who is it you are going to try to arm? And you probably read in the papers my view was we should try to find some of the groups that were there that we thought we could build relationships with and develop some covert connections that might then at least give us some insight into what is going on inside Syria.

But the other side of the argument was a very -- it was a very good one, which is we don't know what will happen. We can't see down the road. We just need to stay out of it. The problem now is that you've got Iran in heavily. You've got probably at least 50,000 fighters inside working to support, protect and sustain Assad. And like any war, at least the wars that I have followed, the hard guys who are the best fighters move to the forefront.

* * *

So we now have what everybody warned we would have, and I am very concerned about the spillover effects. And there is still an argument that goes on inside the administration and inside our friends  at NATO and the Europeans. How do intervene -- my view was you intervene as covertly as is possible for Americans to intervene. We used to be much better at this than we are now. Now, you know,  everybody can't help themselves. They have to go out and tell their friendly reporters and somebody else: Look what we're doing and I want credit for it, and all the rest of it.

So we're not as good as we used to be, but we still -- we can still deliver, and we should have in my view been trying to do that so we would have better insight. But the idea that we would have like a no fly zone -- Syria, of course, did have when it started the fourth biggest Army in the world. It had very sophisticated air defense systems. They're getting more sophisticated thanks to Russian imports.

To have a no fly zone you have to take out all of the air defense, many of which are located in populated areas. So our missiles, even if they are standoff missiles so we're not putting our pilots at risk -- you're going to kill a lot of Syrians. So all of a sudden this intervention that people talk about so glibly becomes an American and NATO involvement where you take a lot of civilians.

Some thoughts on Putin:

Look, I would love it if we could continue to build a more positive relationship with Russia. I worked very hard on that when I was Secretary, and we made some progress with Medvedev, who was president inname but was obviously beholden to Putin, but Putin kind of let him go and we helped them get into the WTO for several years, and they were helpful to us in shipping equipment, even lethal equipment, in and out of out of Afghanistan.

So we were making progress, and I think Putin has a different view. Certainly he's asserted himself in a way now that is going to take some management on our side, but obviously we would very much like to have a positive relationship with Russia and we would like to see Putin be less defensive toward a relationship with the United States so that we could work together on some issues.

We've tried very hard to work with Putin on shared issues like missile defense. They have rejected that out of hand. So I think it's what diplomacy is about. You just keep going back and keep trying. And the President will see Putin during the G20 in Saint Petersburg, and we'll see what progress we can make.

Here is Hillary opining on Wikileaks and Edward Snowden:

MR. BLANKFEIN: I'll discuss that after I leave here. Let me ask you another question because this is also a topical question. Let's say, hypothetically, that one country was eavesdropping on another country.
(Laughter.)
MR. BLANKFEIN: And I didn't hear the crisp denials, but I didn't hear any confirmation of it. How would you -- would you be looking forward to giving that explanation? How do you go -- what do you do now?
SECRETARY CLINTON: So, all right. This is all off the record, right? You're not telling your spouses if they're not here.
MR. BLANKFEIN: Right.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Okay. I was Secretary of State when WikiLeaks happened. You remember that whole debacle. So out come hundreds of thousands of documents. And I have to go on an apology tour. And I had a jacket made like a rock star tour. The Clinton Apology Tour. I had to go and apologize to anybody who was in any way characterized in any of the cables in any way that might be considered less than flattering. And it was painful. Leaders who shall remain nameless, who were characterized as vain, egotistical, power hungry --
MR. BLANKFEIN: Proved it.
SECRETARY CLINTON: -- corrupt. And we knew they were. This was not fiction. And I had to go and say, you know, our ambassadors, they get carried away, they want to all be literary people. They go off on tangents. What can I say. I had grown men cry. I mean, literally. I am a friend of America, and you say these things about me.
MR. BLANKFEIN: That's an Italian accent.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Have a sense of humor.
MR. BLANKFEIN: And so you said, Silvio.
(Laughter.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: So, fast forward. Here we are. You know, look, I have said, and I will continue to say, we do need to have a conversation with and take a hard look at the right balance that we could strike between, you know, privacy and security because there's no doubt, and I've seen this and understand it, there's no doubt that much of what we've done since 9/11 has kept us safer. That's just a fact. It's also kept our friends and our partners and our allies safer, as well. The sharing of intelligence requires the gathering of intelligence and the analysis of intelligence.
* * *
MR. BLANKFEIN: Maybe embedded you've already given part the answer, but how serious, how bad was it what Snowden and Assange did? What are the -- I mean, Assange -- if this were a destroyer and innovator conference, we might have had Assange here.
SECRETARY CLINTON: I wouldn't be here.
MR. BLANKFEIN: But how much did that hurt us? Aside from the embarrassment, clearly some avenues now, some things we relied on that, have been closed off for us. I know it was very important to try to get some legislation that would have made it legal to get some more of this metadata that's been very helpful without having the carriers face liability. That's probably been put on the back burner. What are the consequences long term for this in terms of our own safety and the safety of the Republic.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, separate the two. The WikiLeaks problem put at risk certain individuals. We had to -- we had to form a kind of investigative team that looked at all the names and all the documents, which was quite a challenge, to make sure that identities that were either revealed or described in enough detail that they could be determined would not put people who were at risk. I mean, without going into detail, you know, maybe they're -- let's just hypothetically say there was somebody serving in a military in a certain country who was worried about some of the activities of the military that he served because he thought they were doing business with rogue states or terrorist networks, and so he would seek out an American diplomat to begin a conversation. And the American diplomat would report back about the concerns that were being expressed about what was happening in this country. And then it's -- you know, it's exposed to the world. So we had to identify, and we moved a number of people to safe -- to safety out of where they were in order for them to be not vulnerable.
So on the WikiLeaks, there was the embarrassment factor, there were the potential vulnerability factors that individuals faced. The WikiLeaks issue was, you know, unfortunate. Private Manning should have never had access to a lot of what he did have access to. So, in effect, it was a problem. But it didn't expose the guts of how we collect and analyze data.
* * *
So, you know, if Snowden has given them a blueprint to how we operate, why is that in any way a positive. We should have the debate. We should have the conversation. We should make the changes
where they're necessary. But we shouldn't put our systems and our people at risk. So I think that WikiLeaks was a big bump in the road, but I think the Snowden material could be potentially much more threatening to us.

* * *
We are currently readying the transcripts for further informative details about what Hillary tells the world's most improtant commercial bank in private.
Here are the full speeches with links:
Speech #1 (link)

* * *
Speech #2 (link)

* * *
Speech #3 (link)

 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-15/here-are-hillary-clintons-three-speeches-goldman-sachs-which-she-was-paid-675000

A few documents they don't want you to have... Stop Foreclosure, Stop Victimless crime prosecution, Shut down the prosecutor

These documents are hard hitting and the DeFacto courts do not want you to have this information.

Be careful with these documents as they may label you as a paper terrorist if you use them.

This is a document that caused a Federal Judge to shut down all foreclosures in his district. The Sheriff can be arrested and imprisoned for holding foreclosure sales!
http://nesara.news/media/wayne_country_sheriff%20.pdf

Attachments:

• traficant_files.doc (136 KB)
• nt.docx (125 KB)
• operation_of_every_single_claim_in_a_nutshell.doc (37 KB)
• law_of_nations_book_iii_section_15.docx (14 KB)
• infant_status.docx (12 KB)
• 21.7.13.3.2.2.doc (13 KB)
• a_judge_is_not_the_court.docx (1.1 MB)
• wells_fargo-attorney-manual.pdf (2.5 MB)
•  
•  
•  

“The Wikileaks Bombshell Never Discussed By Media” (How Hillary REALLY Feels About Us All)

Less than a month to go before the election, and the revelations are piling up.
Bombshell after bombshell has come out from the latest round of Wikileaks documents about Hillary.
What the GOP could get from testimony and official investigative vetting of the former Secretary of State has been produced by the robin hoods of the digital age.
Despite clear evidence that the future Madam President has colluded with unsavory foreign leaders, traded access for cash and engaged in an enterprising empire of cronyism in toppling countries and exchanging no-bid contracts to manage the messes made all across the globe… and obviously much, much more… despite all this, Hillary remains closer than ever to the coveted White House, the prime lobbyist-in-chief office for the military industrial complex and various other related tentacles of the establishment.
Among other scandals that have been summarily dismissed by the military comes a document showing clearly that Hillary Clinton and her staff literally discussed the blowback of a system that willingly produced a population of unaware, trendy people now gripped by social media.
The Trump phenomenon – of an unstoppable celebrity entertainment figure assuming the mold of actual leader – is quite dangerous indeed, and something that the Clinton campaign must account for via the John Podesta leaks:

“As I’ve mentioned, we’ve all been quite content to demean government, drop civics and in general conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.
The unawareness remains strong but compliance is obviously fading rapidly.”

Not only does this pile into the basket of deplorables, basement dwellers and right wing conspirators that she has herself created, but it defines the true context of the question we have all been asking ourselves – how did things ever get so debased in American politics; how did things go so wrong?
There are many pieces to that puzzle, but the pied-piper media is a major component, and Hillary has long positioned herself as an undisputed ringmaster of media manipulation. That her trail of scandals could surface, but remain unable to sink her campaign is testament to her formidable power leading into 2016.
via Paul Joseph Watson:

“While the media was distracting you with Trump saying the word “pussy” 11 years ago, huge revelations emerged.”

The real politik assessment of the dulled, drugged and dumbed-down American voter pool is cynical, but not without merit.

And it also comes as confirmation to all those who see the lies and deceptions on a daily basis – that politicians do see themselves as herding a population of sheep.

Now, the Clinton campaign has actually spoken in those terms. Hillary literally hates the “everyday Americans,” the rednecks and the bitter clingers. But she hates all the rest of them too, an excuse to detach from every needs from ordinary people, and convince herself that she is entitled to rule over everyone, to seize power and to use deception as a necessary means to that end.

The Internet and social media continue to present myriad challenges to the establishment, who are seeking to contain the genie that they have let out of the bottle.

The information warfare culture cuts in all directions, and can rise and fall the politics of the 21st Century – even for puppets in power.

That is clearly why the mainstream media – more cozy in bed with Hillary than Bill ever could be – refuses to say a word about the continuing revelations of corruption – both in the voting process, and in the offices and positions held by Hillary Clinton.

These scandals would have wrecked any other candidate decades ago. Instead, today Hillary is shielding herself behind a ‘He is worse’ campaign that is using savvy and dangerous intimacy with TNT to wield Donald Trump against GOP and DNC rivals, and against the informed voters of this country in general.

But With the Internet, the “Unaware” Become ‘Politically Conscious and Interactive’

It calls to mind the stark warning by former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski – an insider globalist with tremendous seniority – who cautioned the ranks of his own elite that the 21st Century masses were waking up to the political realities, and are deeply unhappy with the status quo:

CFR Meeting: Zbigniew Brzezinski Fears The Global Awakening


Zbigniew Brzezinski stated, in his long-winded diplomatic way, that the masses are capable of determining part of the outcome as well, and through the global nature of information exchange, also have eyes to see the truth about world affairs.

For the first time in human history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive… The resulting global political activism is generating a surge in the quest for personal dignity, cultural respect and economic opportunity in a world painfully scarred by memories of centuries-long alien colonial or imperial domination… The worldwide yearning for human dignity is the central challenge inherent in the phenomenon of global political awakening… That awakening is socially massive and politically radicalizing… The nearly universal access to radio, television and increasingly the Internet is creating a community of shared perceptions and envy that can be galvanized and channeled by demagogic political or religious passions. These energies transcend sovereign borders and pose a challenge both to existing states as well as to the existing global hierarchy, on top of which America still perches…
The youth of the Third World are particularly restless and resentful. The demographic revolution they embody is thus a political time-bomb, as well… Their potential revolutionary spearhead is likely to emerge from among the scores of millions of students concentrated in the often intellectually dubious “tertiary level” educational institutions of developing countries. Depending on the definition of the tertiary educational level, there are currently worldwide between 80 and 130 million “college” students. Typically originating from the socially insecure lower middle class and inflamed by a sense of social outrage, these millions of students are revolutionaries-in-waiting, already semi-mobilized in large congregations, connected by the Internet and pre-positioned for a replay on a larger scale of what transpired years earlier in Mexico City or in Tiananmen Square. Their physical energy and emotional frustration is just waiting to be triggered by a cause, or a faith, or a hatred…
[The] major world powers, new and old, also face a novel reality: while the lethality of their military might is greater than ever, their capacity to impose control over the politically awakened masses of the world is at a historic low. To put it bluntly: in earlier times, it was easier to control one million people than to physically kill one million people; today, it is infinitely easier to kill one million people than to control one million people.

The elite no longer have a monopoly on the narrative – and that is a distinct challenge that no leader or power broker should ignore. To the contrary, it should be weaponized and properly used.
That, it seems, is the proper context for the bluntly stated goal exposed in Hillary’s emails:

“[to] conspire to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.“

Clearly, this arrange is dangerous for us all.
Has the grand finale already been rigged and arranged?
Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan

Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore: The BLM is a Domestic Terrorist Agency

On Thursday morning, Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore took to the Nevada Assembly floor to point out several thing regarding the Oregon occupation, the Bundy Ranch siege and the sheriffs who were involved in both. She also pointed out at the center of both of them was the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and she referred to them as one of several "Domestic Terrorist Agencies."

"I stand in support of and know that Blue Lives Matter," she began. "When we have Law Enforcement and County Sheriffs that support their citizens and Law Makers we need to support them too."

"But there have been Sheriff's that hand their elected positions over to the Federal Government and some of the outcomes have been fatal," she added. "Sheriff David Ward of Harney County Oregon did just that. Under his watch a man, Lavoy Finicum, was murdered."

She then pointed to the illegal and unconstitutional BLM and noted a few of the things in which they have been involved.

"The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has become quite aggressive across our Nation; from continual harassment of our Indigenous Native Americans to our Rancher's, who are just trying to protect their livelihoods," she said.
However, it wasn't just pointing out a problem that has been growing for decades. Fiore also provided a solution to the problem.

"It's up to us to ensure our communities have the resources needed to protect its citizens from Domestic Terrorist Agencies such as the BLM," Fiore said.
"Most of my fellow friends in this Chamber were not at Bunkerville in April of 2014, but Sheriff Lombardo and Sheriff Douglas Gillespie were there," she added. "Our Clark County Sheriffs stopped the Nevada Massacre the BLM had planned."

Then she dropped a bombshell on the Assembly floor for the record, which we reported on earlier.

"As the body camera footage from the BLM gets unsealed and released to the press and the public, the words I just spoke will be verified," she concluded.
Indeed the BLM is part of the Agenda 21 of the United Nations. The have been caught engaging in real terror tactics of burning property and cattle, something that even Ranchers Dwight and Steven Hammond didn't do, but were sent to prison for five years. They have claimed that their authority supersedes the Constitution. And why? It's because the land has value for corrupt politicians like Hillary Clinton and Harry Reid, who are the very definition of traitors to the united States.

Good call Michele! The BLM, like the rest of the unconstitutional agencies out of DC are pulling the mask off and showing exactly what they are, domestic terrorist agencies.

 http://freedomoutpost.com/nevada-assemblywoman-michele-fiore-the-blm-is-a-domestic-terrorist-agency/

Housekeeping 101 --- Us and Them by Anna Von Reitz

Good morning, good evening, good wherever and whenever this finds you all.

I will be doing some extra work for the next few weeks and as a result my ability to publish will be somewhat uneven. This doesn't "mean" anything, except that I am in meetings and teleconferences and shuttling around from place to place more than normal----all of which takes time and detracts from communication.

Major funding for the actual government of the people, by the people, and for the people is being discussed and provided for. As more and more people have awakened and realized the Truth--- that the private, mostly foreign-owned governmental services corporation operating out of District of Columbia is not our government and its local franchises are not our states-- it becomes evident that reforming or even replacing the governmental services corporation with a new one doesn't fix the actual underlying problem.

Read that--- it doesn't matter if the thing in DC is called the UNITED STATES (INC.) or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (INC.) or the NEW REPUBLIC (INC.) or CULPEPPER'S FIVE AND DIME (INC.) It is still just a corporation in the business of providing government services.

If our new service provider is more sensible and efficient and honest, yippee, but at the end of the day, we are still being "serviced" by a hired staff of foreign lackeys instead of governing ourselves and watching out for our own self-interest.

Imagine that you hired a firm to do all your housekeeping tasks: do the grocery shopping, laundry, cooking, take out the trash, sweep the floors, vacuum the rugs..... and imagine that you were gone for a while (150 years) and in the meantime the housekeeping staff decided, well, what ho? Might as well move into the house, sleep in the beds, eat the food, use the credit cards.....

That is what has happened here.

So as a result of having pushed your credit cards over the limit and numerous other horrendous abuses of your power and mischaracterization of you, the housekeepers responsible are being kicked out and new housekeeping companies are competing to take over the contract.

There are no lack of wannabe replacement service providers. SWISSINDO is funding one group and Jacob Rothschild is funding another and there will be more vying to be recognized as Successor to Contract. This is because our Forefathers gave away control of our currency, our trade policy, and our foreign policy to their servants, the British inhabitants, who were hired to provide us with "essential government services" after the Revolutionary War.

The odious debts accrued by the former housekeeping service can be written off, but the fundamental problem remains. They aren't us. It's wacko for any nation (or as in our case, group of fifty nations) to rely on foreign subcontractors to preserve their currency, dictate their trade policies, and set their foreign policy.

This is "why" our money has been grossly devalued, why our industry has suffered, and why we have been kept at constant war for the better part of 200 years. One housekeeping company after another has abused its position of trust, and unless we take action in our own behalf, that is the natural result of abdicating our oversight responsibility and not controlling our employees.

Restoring Checks and Balances requires a reorganization of the actual states occupying the land jurisdiction and also a reorganization of the counties giving rise to the states. It requires unincorporated counties and unincorporated states functioning under the Law of the Land, instead of the Law of the Sea. It requires a clear grasp of who you are and who they are.

A change in service providers is normally chaos enough, and you will necessarily see "offers" with this group and that group promising to clean up the mess in DC and promising to abide by and honor the "Constitution"---without, of course, mentioning which constitution they might be talking about.

The important point to keep in mind is that even though these people appear to be Americans, once they cross the line and become employees of the "federal corporation" they are not functioning as Americans. They are not us.

The further point to remember is that we have a duty and responsibility to ourselves and our country and our progeny to ride herd on them and do a good, efficient job of it. That means enforcement of the Public and Organic Law on our soil. That means running our own townships and parishes and counties as unincorporated business structures. That means running our states as unincorporated business structures, too.

The Alaska State is the actual state operating the land jurisdiction of Alaska; the State of Alaska and the STATE OF ALASKA and ALASKA and any other permutation the rats can dream up, are just corporations in the business of providing government services, local franchises of one or another federal parent corporations.

Its the same way everywhere else. The Virginia Commonwealth is the actual "state" in Virginia, whereas the Commonwealth of Virginia, VIRGINIA, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA are corporate franchises in the business of selling and providing governmental services.

Now that you can tell the difference between us and them, you can begin to understand why it is absolutely necessary for us to accept the responsibility of self-governance.

We have to determine the limits of their services and billings. We have to draw the line between their law enforcement and our peacekeeping. We have to vet the quality of their services and act as consumers with respect to them. We have to have our states well-organized and ready to override over-reaching and mis-administration by the federal corporations. We have to keep the governmental services corporations and the government subcontractors in line the same way any employer has to keep employees toeing the line.

It's time to step forward into the gap and fulfill our part as the unincorporated Body Politic---the "missing" employer. Because we are doing this public service for ourselves and not for profit, we can get the job done for a lot less. Think of it as mopping your own floor instead of paying someone else to do it.

There are still some expenses--- soap, buckets, etc., and yes, there is a need to provide support for those who can't afford to donate their time and to pay for professional expertise we don't have readily available.

As crucial as all your donations are and continue to be, we have over a hundred non-bar lawyers and PAGS and as many paralegals, many of whom need some level of support, and more than nine million continental marshals and deputies in need of training, uniforms, badges, gas money, bonding, insurance, etc., etc. We have researchers and archivists, too. We have an entire new banking system to set up. And let's face it, we have millions of Americans who need to be educated and brought up to speed.

Grateful as I am and as we all are, this is going to take more than Mom and Pop donations of cookie jar money. Even the relatively simple job of claiming and collecting American assets that are owed to us all over the globe is daunting and when it is undertaken by individuals using their own assets to pay for legal filings and travel and certified copies of documents, etc., etc., etc., it is only by the Grace of God that we have been enabled to keep going and make headway on all this.

Please be patient while we begin "mopping the floor" and consider how you can help. There are 3100 counties in America, many of them only continuing to function as lawful governments at the township or parish level. Get involved locally, if you can spare the time at all, form your local Jural Assembly, and start educating the people in your community.

Point out the fact that the land jurisdiction government was vacated when the county incorporated.

As a result, there is nobody in charge and actually tasked with enforcing the public and organic law--- including the guarantees of The Constitution.

The "sheriff" isn't really a sheriff anymore. He's not --in most cases--- functioning as a public peacekeeping officer. He's functioning as a private corporation's code and statute enforcer, instead.

This means that if you want the actual Public Law enforced, you have to take back your birthright political status and organize your local Jural Assembly and elect your own Sheriff to operate in the land jurisdiction office. 

And while the incorporated counties are receiving "federal block grants" --- those "block grants" are the result of federal corporation racketeering and pillaging carried out against your own assets, your own people, your own businesses, and your own land. You are funding your own misery and demise.

As long as your county takes this bait and operates as a corporate franchise it has no standing and no credibility as any part of our legitimate government. It's just a governmental services provider for hire, like Mike's Security Service or Fast Eddie's Carpet Cleaning. And it is the same way with the state government.

Remember--- it's government of the people, for the people, by the people--- not government of the corporation, for the corporation, by the corporation. And get out your brooms and scrub brushes.

---------------------------------------

See this article and over 300 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

480

Main Events Rundown of the Grand Acclamation Event - WORLD DEBT BURDEN LIBERATION AND M1 MASTER BOND VOUCHERS TO BE ANNOUNCED

http://swissindo.news/main-events-rundown-of-the-grand-acclamation-event/

http://swissindo.news/world-debt-burden-liberation-and-m1-master-bond-vouchers-to-be-announced/

Video test for nesara.news to other websites

This is a test for uploading and embedding videos. http://nesara.news/index.php/video-test-for-gary#c179

http://nesara.news/media/blogs/a/quick-uploads/p343/big_buck_bunny_720p_1mb.mp4