Trump Assassination / False Flags Planned by Left
Navy Seal Expert
Published on Nov 14, 2016
Alex Jones talks with Navy SEAL Matt Bracken about the globalist plans to stop Donald Trump and what we can do to counter it.
Sunday, November 20, 2016
Beyond Disturbing: DC's "Comet Pizza" Pedophile Ring May Literally Bring Down Our Government!!
Now
we know the smoking gun that WikiLeaks (Julian Assange) was holding.
I've read statements that Mr. Trump was not involved with Epstein nor
any of his nefarious escapades.
Near
the end, there is a short video of Joe Biden speaking to a girl when he
didn't know the microphone was still on. Also a photo of a girl sitting
on B.O.'s lap.
Please pray for all the children.
From: Bix Weir <bix@roadtoroota.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 8:41 AM
Subject: Beyond Disturbing: DC's "Comet Pizza" Pedophile Ring May Literally Bring Down Our Government!!
The
alt media is running wild connecting the dots for the DC Pedophile Ring
and it's not pretty. It started with the Podesta Wikileaked emails but
the trail leads on to many, many others. This goes to the highest
offices in our Nation not only including the President and the Vice
President but even the FBI's top brass in charge of safeguarding against
child trafficking.
There has been so much evidence exposed over the last few weeks that there is NO WAY this can be hidden any longer.
Here's a video that connect the dots and there are dozens more being posted everyday...
WARNING: If you watch this video you will never look at our leaders in Washington the same way again.
DC's Comet Pizza Pedophile Ring
Honestly,
I don't know how to feel about this information. I don't know whether
to be angry or just break down in tears because the ramifications for
our Nation of this information coming out into the open cannot not be
underestimated.
Now we know why FBI Director Comey dropped the Clinton email case right before the election and Trump was "allowed" to win.
This can literally TAKE DOWN our entire government structure.
I knew it was bad but I had no idea it was this bad and so out in the open.
God save the United States of America...if we are meant to be saved.
I
Bix Weir
http://nesara.news/index.php/beyond-disturbing-dc-s-quot
The Answer to Standing Rock
Attention, Please. The Answer to Standing Rock. Again.
Sunday, November 20, 2016
When there is an argument about money, don't try to make it into an argument about morals. Reply in kind.
Some corrupt federated and incorporated fake "county governments" have seen a way to line their pockets with money from pipeline company and oil company profits. So they cut a deal allowing these corporations to put a pipeline through.
The problem for these corrupt "county" organizations is that they are just franchises (like Dairy Queen franchises) of parent corporations in the governmental services business. They don't actually have anything to say about it if the people form their own unincorporated land jurisdiction country assembly and say otherwise.
We dealt with this same problem in Nebraska, but did it intelligently.
We called public meetings in the affected counties. The people came from miles around. The options were fully disclosed. The people said--- hey, okay, you want to put a pipeline through our land? First, we want $800 million as an Accident Insurance Fund, deposited in these local banks under the control of these three designated Insurance Fund Trustees appointed by us to provide immediate clean up and spill control in the event of any accidents. Second, we want another $500 million infrastructure improvement fund deposited in these local banks (X, Y, Z) to pay for all the infrastructure that needs to be built in support of the communities impacted by these activities. Third, we need a PILT, a Payment in Lieu of other Taxes, to pay for public education and ecological monitoring and increased county services.....
The oil companies and pipeline companies don't understand morals or ethics or the need for clean water or peace or decency or anything else. All they understand is money. And when the people who actually own the land stand up and make them an "offer" that they can't swallow---an offer that costs them too much to make their pipeline profitable--- they readily back away and find other ways to transport oil.
The problem with Standing Rock is that people aren't using their common sense and aren't replying in-kind to these weasels. The oil and pipeline companies are talking oil and the people are talking water.
The other problem is that the people in these counties are letting fake counties--- incorporated "counties" that have only a "proprietary"--- that is, "caretaker" role and interest, to make deals "in their behalf"---- which are contrary to what the people who actually own the land want to have happen.
This like hiring and paying somebody to run your cattle ranch, then having him decide that he wants to raise sheep instead, and you not having brains enough to correct your own employees.
Hello? These people work for you. You are paying their paychecks. If you don't want to raise sheep on your land --- or in this case, don't want the profit from letting a pipeline cross your land--- tell the pipeline companies the truth.
The land belongs to the people, not the County Commissioners.
So the pipeline companies made a deal with the wrong folks. Turns out the actual entitlement holders of the land don't approve of what their hired help agreed to.
Hold a public assembly of the unincorporated county in each of the impacted counties, that is, the actual counties where actual people live, not a "county" that exists only on paper. Describe the options. Put it to a vote. Make the pipeline company an offer that it can't possibly make money on, and watch them re-route their operations. It's simple. It's easy. There is no reason for all this drama and people getting hurt.
So stop this stupidity, please, or don't complain to me. All the oil companies and pipeline companies want to do is make money off your resources. Deny them that opportunity by making the price of doing business too high in your area, and they will happily trot off into the sunset and go elsewhere.
These numbnutz want to make money off of resources that belong to you, and to some extent you may need or want to develop those resources---- or not. It's up to you. So instead of milling about like dumb cattle going to slaughter, or sitting in front of bull dozers howling at the moon, get up on your feet and call a lawful assembly of the people living in the impacted counties and take care of your own business the way you want it taken care of.
It's only your inaction and your seeming inability to direct your own employees that is causing this problem--- plus the lack of a little practical savvy when it comes to dealing with business offers that you don't want to consider.
When a commercial business makes you an offer and you don't want to accept it---- (as in, "I'll build a pipeline through the middle of your sacred ground and pay these other guys a lot of money for the privilege.") there is no need to be ugly or impolite. Just make a counter-offer. (like, "Sure, you can build your pipeline through my sacred ground for a trillion dollars, payable immediately.")
Can the pipeline company complain that you have done anything wrong? No. Can the "county" complain that you don't have the right to put any price you want on your own property? No. Can anyone bulldoze even a blade of grass without your consent as the entitlement owners of that actual property? No.
So learn how to deny your consent.
Those county officials are pretending to "represent" you and your best interests. They aren't doing the job, are they? So hold a public assembly, say so in public, and either reprimand them as your employees and demand that they withdraw their offers made in "your behalf" or fire them on the spot.
This is not rocket science, but it does have rules and procedures that are obvious and easy to follow. Post Notice of a Public Assembly of the land jurisdiction County open to all living people and lawful residents to be held (where) and on this day and when. Whoever shows up, rules. Whoever stays home and watches re-runs of "I Love Lucy" drools.
No protests required. No attack dogs. No stun guns. No commercial mercenaries or other thugs. Just put your demand on the table as the actual entitlement holders and make the cost of moving through your county so stiff that the rats suck wind clear back to Boston. Faced with a few billion dollars additional cost, they will vanish like morning mist.
And as for the "county" that isn't a county and all those "federated" county officials, they have nothing to say about what you do with your land once you speak up and tell them what you want done. They are just employees, caretakers, on your payroll. If they don't do exactly what you wish, you go tell their Congressman----- the King Rat responsible for their misbehavior and misadministration of your property and resources while they are "residing" here and pretending to "represent" you and your best interests.
Demand that he or she straighten this mess out tout de suite.
Tell them that you held an assembly of the actual land jurisdiction county and the people living in the actual county said----hell, no, we don't want any pipelines here. We entitlement holders took a vote and told the pipeline company that it would cost a trillion dollars up front if they want to cross our land. They haven't paid up and your local yokels are trying to go forward with this nonsense. Time for you, Mr. Congressman, to get involved and administer this yourself.
And, by the way, you are under contract to do exactly what we say with regard to our land and our resources, without argument or question. Once the local unincorporated land jurisdiction body politic has spoken, there is no higher authority and nobody to appeal our decision to.
---------------------------------------
REVEALED: The Real Fake News List
http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/revealed-the-real-fake-news-list
By Chris Rossini
We've seen the make-shift "fake news" list created by a leftist feminist professor. Well, another fake news list has been revealed and this one holds a lot more water.
This list contains the culprits who told us that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and lied us into multiple bogus wars. These are the news sources that told us "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." They told us that Hillary Clinton had a 98% of winning the election. They tell us in a never-ending loop that "The economy is in great shape!"
This is the real Fake News List (and it's sourced):
We've seen the make-shift "fake news" list created by a leftist feminist professor. Well, another fake news list has been revealed and this one holds a lot more water.
This list contains the culprits who told us that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and lied us into multiple bogus wars. These are the news sources that told us "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor." They told us that Hillary Clinton had a 98% of winning the election. They tell us in a never-ending loop that "The economy is in great shape!"
This is the real Fake News List (and it's sourced):
ANONYMOUS 2 ISSUES ALERT! CALLS FOR CITIZENS TO BE ON WATCH!
ANONYMOUS 2 ISSUES ALERT! CALLS FOR CITIZENS TO BE ON WATCH FOR INCOMING SHIPMENT OF WEAPONS!
SUBJECT: INCOMING SHIPMENT OF WEAPONS ORDERED BY CLINTONS TO BE GIVEN TO TERRORISTS WITHIN THE STATES AS REPORTED BY KENT DUNN IN THE REPORT TITLED: 'ALERT' ON NOV 19 2016 AT APPROX 1:28 PM
THE CABAL PUTS OUT PROPAGANDA TO GET THE PEOPLE LOOKING IN ONE DIRECTION (AT A SHIP) WHILE THEY PULL OFF A TRAITOROUS STUNT IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION.
THAT IS WHY WE ARE CALLING YOUR ATTENTION TO THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS REVEALED BY KENT DUNN IN THE POST ON SAT NOV 19TH TITLED:
ALERT! IMPORTANT INTEL UPDATE FOR ALL AMERICANS!!!
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2016/11/alert-important-intel-update-for-all.html"The events below do NOT mean we are "out of the woods" yet, as Hillary had ordered every kind of weapon possible in great abundance which is to arrive by ship MID November which is NOW. Her plans were to hand every Muslim and immigrant these weapons for their use to murder us nationwide."
WHY SEND BY SHIP WHEN AIRPLANES PROVIDE A MORE EFFICIENT DELIVERY AND CAN TARGET DROP OFFS OF THE LOAD OF WEAPONS WHEREVER IT NEEDS TO GO - DROPPING BY PARACHUTE AT THE DESIGNATED TERRORISTS' LOCATIONS RATHER THAN THE LESS EFFICIENT DELIVERY BY SHIPS, WHICH CAN BE SEIZED OR SUNK. A SHIP HAS TO DOCK AT A PORT, UNLOAD THE WEAPONS ON TRUCKS OR TRAINS AND TRANSPORT TO THE DESIGNATED DROP OFF LOCATIONS.
WE ARE ADVISING OUR NATION TO BE VERY WATCHFUL OF ALL TRUCKS, TRAINS AND MANNER OF SHIPMENT WITHIN THE STATES THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE TRANSPORTING AND DROPPING OFF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF WEAPONRY TO MUSLIMS, JIHADIS, BLACK LIVES MATTER, THE NEW PANTHERS, ET AL. EARLIER REPORTS HAVE STATED THAT MANY OF THE MUSLIM MOSQUES HAVE BASEMENTS WHERE TRAINING IS PROVIDED AND WEAPONS ARE BEING STORED.
PLEASE REPORT TO YOUR LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND MILITIA IF YOU FIND SOMETHING WORTHY TO BE INVESTIGATED.
THE LIVES YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS - AND YOUR OWN! WE NEED EVERY ONE OF YOU TO BE READY AND ON GUARD TO SAVE OUR NATION!
GOD BLESS!
Election Rejection: Liberal Hatred and Hypocrisy Rage in Violence Due to Biased Media
When Donald Trump would not state with certainty that he would accept the election results before even knowing what the results were or how they might come about, liberals wrung their hands all over the media in grief over the loss of democracy as we know it. Hillary, herself, decried that she had never heard anything so anti-democratic and unAmerican in her life.
Now hundreds of thousands of liberals around the nation join in protests and even riots to proclaim, “Not my president” and “Dump Trump.” A few have created petitions for their liberal states to secede from the union. Still others are recommending that the electoral college overthrow the election. They were fine with the electoral college when they were certain that Hillary would win due to the electoral vote outweighing the broad sweep of popular votes that Trump might get, but now that the candidates’ roles are reversed, they say the centuries-old electoral college needs to be abolished.
Of course the snowflakes are also all melting down because they were brought up in a sheltered existence where everyone gets a prize just for participating. Because there were no losers in snowflake schools, this is their first experience of what real-world losing feels like. In the stark world they are just entering outside the educational womb, losing just means you get nothing of what you wanted. Naturally, they’re balling about that. For those who have continued on to college, the womb is trying to wrap itself around them one last time by giving them puppies and hot chocolate and therapy.
Liberals organize for anarchy because of biased media coverage about Trump
Says one group that hated Trump for refusing to say he would accept the election results before knowing why and how the results came out…#DisruptJ20 call[s] for a bold mobilization against the inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20, 2017: On Friday, January 20, 2017, Donald Trump will be inaugurated as President of the United States. We call on all people of good conscience to join in disrupting the ceremonies. If Trump is to be inaugurated at all, let it happen behind closed doors, showing the true face of the security state Trump will preside over. It must be made clear to the whole world that the vast majority of people in the United States do not support his presidency or consent to his rule…. We must take to the streets and protest, blockade, disrupt, intervene, sit in, walk out, rise up, and make more noise and good trouble than the establishment can bear. The parade must be stopped. (Zero Hedge)In their video, this group even goes as far as to say,
Trump’s success proves the bankruptcy of representative democracy. Rather than using the democratic process as an alibi for inaction, we must show that no election could legitimize his agenda.
This is beyond hypocrisy. It’s a blatant call for anarchy. As the video title says, it is a call to make sure there is “no peaceful transition” of power. This group appears to be hoping the National Guard will be called out in order to create the appearance that Trump can only “rule,” as they put it, through a police state. Hypercritically, they are the ones doing their best already to make sure that is how it plays out.
I lay the blame for this organized chaos on the liberal mainstream media. It is the outcome to their constant distorted replays of Trump’s words. Yes, Trump’s huge mouth lends itself to easy trouble because he says things as boisterously and provocatively as possible in order to get free media coverage, but the media readily bought into all of that because it sells, and they even hyped what he said every time they replayed it to make sure it sold even more and that it suited their goal of saving the liberal establishment. The cost of that is now peace itself because of the fear factor that the irresponsible media sought to create in hopes of preventing Trump from being elected (and to make bigger headlines).
For example, when Trump said we should send Mexican rapists home, the media constantly replayed that with commentary that turned it into “all Mexicans are rapists,” creating fear in the Mexican-American community that Trump hates Mexicans. What he really said was that a handful of specific Mexicans who were known by the Obama Administration to be convicted criminal rapists and who had been allowed to remain in the US and who subsequently raped American women, should have been sent home before that could ever happen. He was highlighting the shear stupidity of a government that is so extreme in its refusal to deport illegal aliens that it even insists on keeping rapists here. But media bias created a flurry of fear out of Trump’s boisterous words.
Likewise, Trump NEVER said that he has grabbed women inappropriately, though that is what the liberal media kept saying he said. In the now infamous video Trump switches from saying how he tried to seduce a woman and failed (hardly bragging) to saying he was surprised he failed because celebrities can usually get away with outrageous actions, and then he states the most outrageous thing that comes to his mind. He notably switches from saying “I did” to saying “you can” at exactly that point. In other words, “It was amazing I couldn’t seduce her with my offer of a buying spree for her apartment when celebrities can usually get away with doing any outrageous thing they want.”
The fact is that celebrities like rock stars often DO get anything they want sexually. There are always gold diggers and fanatics who throw themselves at celebrities. These are women who would wrap their legs around a celebrity who did what Trump talked about and say, “Bring it on, Big Boy.” This was far from the mea culpa that the media made it into.
The video above takes off with these media misrepresentations as if all of them were fact. So, the media is more culpable than simply being a biased bystander. It has created the narrative that has fueled this fear and rage across the country. As if Trump’s mouth was not provocative enough, the biased media distorted his words at every turn.
Trump might not have accepted the election results if he saw irregularities that looked like evidence of rigging. If so, he might have gone to court — all within his legal rights — just as the Democrats did when Al Gore refused to accept the election results based on irregularities. These people, however, are doing their best to set up blockades to make sure the president-elect can’t even be inaugurated. They’re not just going to protest the election results; they’re organizing to try to prevent the results from playing out!
Media bias continues unabated distortions this past week
Above the pandemonium, the most egregious thing amid all of this hypocrisy that I have witnessed is the disingenuous coverage by the “progressive” press about the liberal riots and violence against Trump supporters.ABC News mentioned in one report that Trump had not done much to ask his supporters to stop violence, though in fact, he had asked it directly twice on 60-Minutes, which got a lot of replays. Noticeably absent was any statement by ABC News about how neither Hillary nor Obama have done anything to ask their supporters to stop acts of hatred and violence, even though it appears to be their supporters who are creating the lion’s share of violence. Obama, while in Berlin this past week, actually encouraged protestors to keep up their protests without saying a word about ending their violence. He spoke only of the nobility of their protests:
One of the great things about our democracy is that it expresses itself in all sorts of ways…. I would not advise people who feel strongly or who are concerned about some of the issues that have been raised during the course of the campaign … I wouldn’t advise them to be silent. What I would advise is that … organizing matters…. Do not take for granted our systems of government and our way of life. (Fox News)President Obama was practically a pep-rally speaker for the protests, even though some have been quite violent. He has refused to ask protestors to stop their violence even after being asked to help quell the storm:
Protests have broken out in cities across the country since Trump’s upset victory last Tuesday. Some have been peaceful, but there have been incidents of violence — and a demonstration last Thursday in Portland escalated into a destructive riot. Trump’s campaign manager Kellyanne Conway repeatedly has called for Obama to speak out on the unrest. “I am calling for responsibility and decency. I hope President Obama says, ‘Cut it out,'” she told “Fox News Sunday.” Obama, though, so far has not done so, speaking mostly in generalities. (Fox News)Not just in generalities but in praise of the protests with no hint whatsoever that the primary perpetrators of violence need to stop it. Yet Trump — who said specifically to his own supporters, if any were engaged in such acts, “stop it” — was portrayed by the press as solely being the one who has not said enough to curb violence. The bias in the coverage is the worst I’ve ever witnessed.
Rebuttals to the Lies, Omissions and New World Order Bias of The New York Times
Lying through statistics about hate crimes
Toward the end of the week, news stories decried the uptick in hate crimes since Trump was elected, often sounding as if the crimes were Trump’s fault. ABC reported, for example, that “many of the incidents made reference to Donald Trump.” What they didn’t say is that much of the violent uptick has been against Trump and his supporters. The highest reported increase, for example, was in the liberal state of California.The media has also hugely exaggerated the significance of the increase:
Overall, the total number of hate crimes against all groups reported by law enforcement agencies to the FBI increased from 5,479 in 2014 to 5,850 last year. That remains far lower than the numbers seen in the early 2000s, but the FBI release comes amid numerous reports of attacks nationwide based on race and religion following last week’s presidential election. (ABC News)Yeah, mostly attacks based on race or religion made against Trump supporters by people who feel afraid that all Trump supporters are bigots because of how the media has played Trump’s comments. The increase the FBI reported includes all the crimes being committed by people of color against White Trump supporters, and still it was only a 7% increase in 2015 (before the presidential campaigns kicked into high gear). It does not include any increase that may have happened in 2016, so there is no justification in attaching the report to the recent violence.
The increase has been presented as if it proves the rhetoric of the Trump campaign during 2015 may have caused a surge of violence. What isn’t said is that in 2013 hate crimes dropped from 6,573 to 5,928 and then dropped again in 2014 to 5,479. So, a rise of less than 400 in 2015 against a drop of about 500 or more in each of the two preceding years is a change that is within the level of normal ups and downs.
No one got all excited about any “huge improvements” in hate crimes in 2013 and 2014; so there is even less reason to be alarmed about a “huge increase” in 2015, given that the change is less than either of the two preceding years. In fact, in 1995, the FBI reported 7,947 hate-crime incidents, and the annual average since then has been 7,573. So, what the media should have reported was that the campaign year of 2015 was 1700 incidents lower than the annual average for hate crimes during the years that the FBI has collected hate-crime statistics (23% lower than the average year)! Moreover, the years have ranged from about 5,000 to 11,500. So, last year wasn’t just well below average but only about half of the peak year.
And that’s how you LIE with statistics! All to make it look as if Trump’s candidacy caused the upsurge.
Some of the liberal commentators this week particularly spoke out against what they said was a huge rise in hate crimes against Muslims — a 67% increase over the previous year! However, a look at the numbers colors the story a little differently there, too: Last year, there were 257 reported incidents of anti-Muslim crimes compared to 154 the year before. That’s a rise of 103 incidents — two more incidents per state for the entire year. When numbers are as small to begin with as 154 (out of about 6,000 hate crimes), its easy to see a 67% increase.
While even an increase of two per state is certainly not good, it is not the outbreak of hatred by Trump supporters that the media kept presenting this week. For a nation with over 320,000,000 people, I think a total of 257 hateful incidents against Muslims is an extraordinarily small number. Incidences against Jews were much higher, and Trump has never said anything against Jews and is more pro-Israel than Obama. You’ll also find far higher incidents of one Muslim sect against another in nearly any Muslim country of your choosing. Any number is too big in that there should be none whatsoever, but that would be only in a perfect world.
Hate crimes against Muslims accounted for 12% of all hate crimes on average between 2001 and 2012), while hate crimes against Christians counted for 8%; but hate crimes against Jews accounted for 66%. The percentage of hate crimes that are directed against each religious group, however, has decreased between 2001 and 2012 compared to the average from 1995-2000, except for Muslims, where it has increased from 2% to 12%.
So, yes, hatred toward Muslims has taken an increasing portion of all hate crimes as hate crimes to other groups has dropped, but it has been increasing for years since 9/11 in 2001, not because of anything Donald Trump has said. For example, hate crimes against Muslims rose 14% in 2014 over 2013 when Donald Trump wasn’t even campaigning. I would suggest it is quite likely that the increase in hatred toward Muslims has far more to do with 9/11 and more recently with the atrocities of ISIS, such as ISIS beheadings, that have happened all over the world, particularly in Paris, in the last couple of years than it has to do with Donald Trump’s rhetoric.
Yet, the media kept trumping up the “surge” of hate crimes this past week because FBI statistics just came out. (These are all FBI statistics, which is charged with compiling statistics for all hate crimes in the US.) The liberal-biased media has attributed the rise in FBI statistics to Trump just because of the reports coincidence with Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election.
How media bias slanted stories of violence against Trump
Quotes like the following were provided by the liberally biased media as the explanation for the latest FBI statistics:“We’ve seen how words from public figures like Donald Trump translate into violence,” said Mark Potok with the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups in the U.S. (ABC News)Actually, however, the FBI’s report stated that the number of hate groups went down in 2015, and it showed that liberal California has the highest number of hate groups of all states.
Sure last week, not included in any of the statistics that were all about 2015 was much more violent than most weeks, but most of the violence was perpetrated by those who don’t like Trump. Some of it was directly against Trump supporters, and some was simply against anyone or any business in the vicinity of an anti-Trump protest/riot. The media said very little about who last week’s increase in violence was against.
Look, too, at the kinds of incidents the liberal media is reporting as acts of hate:
Two students at a vocational school in York County, Pennsylvania, held a Donald Trump sign in a hallway as someone shouted “white power.” (ABC News)While I don’t like that statement because there is undoubtedly racial prejudice behind it, can you imagine that the press would call it an act of hatred if two students were holding a Hillary Clinton sign in a hallway as someone shouted “Black power?” Never in a million years would the hypocritical left with all of its double standards call that an act of racism or hatred. Thus, the press perennially creates the illusion that all racism is one-sided.
It should also be noted that much of the increase in hate crimes was not in response to Donald Trump’s incendiary rhetoric but was backlash to Barrack Obama’s changes on gay/gender issues and his support of Muslims. Not that that makes the crimes OK or justified in any sense, but just that those crimes have nothing to do with Donald Trump; but that was never mentioned in the several stories out this past week about the rise in hate crimes over the past two years.
A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News
Portland under seige, liberals attack Trump supporters across the nation
So-called protests against Trump’s election in Portland are really all-out riots that have included, setting buildings on fire, blocking off trains and roadways with physical barricades, breaking windows, other acts of vandalism, and assaults, even a shooting. Naturally, the nation’s most liberal cities have been the most violent. (ABC News)[Portland] Trail Blazers All-Star guard Damian Lillard is questioning the damage and violence taking place in Portland, Oregon, during anti-Donald Trump protests, saying that isn’t the proper way to go about implementing change. “I think it’s very unfortunate that people have done some of the things they have done during the protest. A lot of harm and damage has been done,” Lillard told ESPN on Saturday. “I do understand their frustration, and I commend people wanting to come together for some kind of change. Tearing apart your own city just isn’t the place to begin, and also making your own city less of a safe place isn’t the answer.” (ABC News)And these people — some of whom attacked police with fire and projectiles and attacked a TV crew — are the ones who are claiming they don’t feel safe because Trump was elected. I think the real truth is that people should not feel safe because of how these people are violently rejecting the election results.
One of the biggest reasons people have protested Trump is because they thought his rhetoric was making them less safe. They were certain Trump’s supporters would become violent if Trump lost and his supporters believed him that the election was rigged. Now, liberals claim the election was rigged because the electoral college didn’t match the popular vote (something they’ve had their entire lifetimes to change if they think it is rigged against them but were fine with when they were certain it would tip the balances in Hillary’s favor).
Earlier this week I reported on two school kids in different schools who were beat up because they supported Donald Trump and about a White guy pulled out of his car and viciously attacked by a group of laughing black people, solely because he was a Trump supporter. Those videos got no play in the mainstream media that I saw. This was covered only by the alternative media that liberals revile.
Activist who claimed that “Trump cannot divide us with his racism,” divided Washington by cutting off all access to the Lincoln Memorial and Pennsylvania Avenue to anyone but themselves. (ABC News)
In Indianapolis, protestors threw rocks at police officers, injuring two.
Not all that Twitters is gold
On the other hand, numerous alternative media sites in the past week carried stories that were nothing more than unsubstantiated rumors. They did so because they were too quick to follow their own biases. These rumors, often based on just some individual’s tweet with a photo, claimed that organizations sponsored by George Soros took out out ads on Craigslist, offering to pay people to protest and that they bussed these hired protestors into cities. These kinds of rumors flew around a lot during the campaign and especially last week, but Snopes.com says they are all untrue, and that does appear to be the case as the support for each rumor is in each case speculation about what was behind the ad or what was behind the photo:Photographs showing long lines of buses were shared with the untrue claim that they were used to ship paid anti-Trump protesters to various cities. (Snopes.com)
Craigslist ads for legitimate canvassing jobs were mistaken by some conspiracists as seeking to recruit paid protesters to swarm Donald Trump rallies. (Snopes.com)Truthorfiction.com gave the same analysis:
It’s been rumored that George Soros and pro-Clinton groups funded protests and paid professional protesters after Donald Trump was elected president. The Truth: We haven’t found any proof that George Soros or pro-Clinton groups have funded anti-Trump protests…. A man named Eric Tucker created a stir on social media when he posted multiple photos of charter buses with the caption “Anti-Trump protestors in Austin today are not as organic as they seem. Here are the busses they came in.” #fakeprotests… A FOX affiliate in Austin found that the charter buses were actually being used to shuttle people from hotels to the Tableau Conference being held at the Austin Convention Center. The buses had nothing to do with protests….Wikileaks emails, however, did show that Democratic Party campaigners bussed illegal aliens from poll to poll to vote over and over. One commentator, Alan Colmes said last week that never happened, but the DNC’s own emails say it did. I guess those working for the DNC were just lying to each other about their activities.
Before Eric Tucker took the tweet down Friday, it had nearly 17,000 retweets and became part of a national controversy. ”I thought going on Twitter was not a big deal, I thought, I have 40 followers, I post twice a year on Twitter, I’m not a professional blogger at all,” Tucker said.
Tucker said seeing a bunch of charter buses lined up on 5th Street near Waller on Wednesday, coincidentally around the same time an anti-Trump rally was being held in downtown Austin he said was unusual. So he took to Twitter with the claims the buses were being used to ship in protesters. “I hadn’t really fact checked at all, it was just all kind of circumstantial and then before I know it, it’s a story, I am over 10,000 tweets by the next day. (Truthorfiction.com)
Why were there no interviews in the mainstream media with those who wrote the emails, asking why they wrote such things? Why was there no investigation into how many emails there are that show these illegal actions? This is why we need the “fifth estate,” but we also need it to be careful and honest.
The Fifth Estate is a socio-cultural reference to groupings of outlier viewpoints in contemporary society, and is most associated with bloggers, journalists publishing in non-mainstream media outlets, and the social media. The “Fifth” Estate extends the sequence of the three classical Estates of the Realm and the preceding Fourth Estate, essentially the mainstream press. The use of “fifth estate” dates to the 1960s counterculture, and in particular the influential The Fifth Estate, an underground newspaper first published in Detroit in 1965. (Wikipedia)As often happens in human affairs, the radical journalists who made up the fifth estate of the 1960s have become the fourth estate of the new establishment. And that’s why a new alternative media is rising to fill the intellectual vacuum and right the balance; but such sites often jump to publish rumors as news because the rumor suits their own cause. We need to be careful and honest about our facts and not jump to conclusions if we want to build credibility.
http://thegreatrecession.info/blog/liberal-hatred-in-biased-media/
Oath Keepers : CALL TO ACTION!
by Stewart Rhodes , November 18, 2016
OFFER OF PROTECTION TO ELECTORS: Oath Keepers is hereby issuing a standing offer of volunteer protection to any of the Electoral College Electors who may feel threatened or in danger from leftist radicals attempting to coerce them into changing their vote as Electors.
Any Elector who wants our assistance may contact us at: electors@oathkeepers.org
Please feel free to repost this notice online, or to pass on to Electors who may need our help. However, Electors are encouraged to initiate contact with us through the above oathkeepers.org email address only and to be wary of anyone contacting them through other means, claiming to be from Oath Keepers. If in doubt, email us to verify.
All communications and requests from electors will be kept in the strictest confidence, and only vetted, trusted, qualified Oath Keepers members will be dispatched to provide security.
That protection can be overt or covert, or a combination of those two postures, at the discretion of the Elector after consultation with our security team leaders, and will consist of our unpaid volunteer retired police officers and experienced combat veterans with personal security detail training and experience. We can, and will, provide this protection from now through their vote on December 19. 2016, and even thereafter if they still feel threatened by terrorists seeking reprisal and punishment for the Electors not bending to their will.
CALL TO ACTION: Due to the gravity of the threat to our Republic from terrorists attempting to steal the election through coercion, this is also a call to action to our state and local leaders, and in particular to our Community Preparedness Team (CPT) leaders, to prepare security details in each of the targeted states to be on standby for immediate deployment if a request for protection comes in from an Elector.
WHY WE ARE DOING THIS: In the wake of President- Elect Donald Trump’s victory on Election Night, Republican Electors across the country have received an increasing wave of harassment and threats, in the form of phone calls, emails, messages on social media, and even in-person visits to their homes, by leftists who seek to pressure those Electors into changing their votes from Trump to Clinton when the Electoral College meets on December 19, 2016. Such harassment and threats intensified after anti-Trump groups published online the names, addressed, phone numbers, emails, gender, and race of Republican Electors in states that went for Trump.
According to the Detroit News, one of the Republican Electors for Michigan, Michael Banerian, has received multiple death threats:
On Dec. 19, the 22-year-old Banerian is scheduled to join 15 other Michiganians to cast their electoral votes for Republican President-elect Donald Trump. But Trump’s opponents have deluged Banerian and other GOP electors with pleas and nasty emails to reverse course and cast their ballots for Clinton, according to the Michigan Republican Party.
“You have people saying ‘you’re a hateful bigot, I hope you die,’ ” he said. “I’ve had people talk about shoving a gun in my mouth and blowing my brains out. And I’ve received dozens and dozens of those emails. Even the non-threatening-my-life emails are very aggressive.”
The Detroit News verified one message containing a death wish and another containing a death threat, in which the person told Banerian he would “put a bullet” in his mouth. Banerian said he deleted the rest of the emails and messages “because as you can imagine they’re clogging up my email.”
“Even if I could, I wouldn’t be remotely interested in changing my vote,” said Banerian, a political science senior at Oakland University and youth vice chair of the Michigan Republican Party. “The people of Michigan spoke, and it’s our job to deliver that message.”Below is a video interview with Mr. Banarian, discussing the threats:
Michigan elector threatened online
As an association of both current serving and veteran police officers, military, fire-fighters and other first responders, we Oath Keepers are duty bound by our oaths to defend the Constitution by defending the electoral process that is at the core of our republican form of government. Any attempt to intimidate and coerce an Elector, through threats of violence, is an act of terrorism, just as much as an attempt to coerce the voters on Election Day would have been terrorism. We expect to see such horrid behavior from the likes of ISIS or in some third world dictatorship where people have guns held to their heads and are ordered to vote for “El Presidente” … “or else.” But now we are seeing the same kind of political terrorism here, at home. This is un-American and unacceptable.
Oath Keepers has, in the past, successfully protected both homes and businesses from the deadly threat of terrorist arsonists during the Ferguson riots (there were apartments above the shops we protected, with families living in them). The arsonists swore they would burn the buildings to the ground, killing all inside. We stopped them.
Bakery Owner, Natalie, with a MARSOC Marine veteran
who stood guard over her during Ferguson riots
Oath Keepers also stood guard over disarmed active duty military recruiters across the nation against the threat of further terrorism, with our Operation Protect the Protectors, after the deadly Chattanooga, TN radical Jihadist terror attack.
We regard any attempts to coerce the Electors as acts of terrorism that deserve an equally strong response. As always, we fully support police in their jobs as they work to protect people against such terrorism, but we also realize that they can rarely provide 24/7 protection of targeted individuals. That is just an unfortunate reality.
In addition, most Americans cannot afford to hire the necessary protection when under such threats. And that is where we come in, providing that protection for free, as is our duty.
In his written statement, Mr. Banarian declares:
I have received death threats and death wishes from many who have the audacity to think they can attempt to intimidate others just because they think they are right. Here’s a wake-up call to some on the left who have been manipulated into harboring deep-seated hatred of those who have a different opinion than them: it is this hubris that cost you this election. Check your hate at the door.Electors in Arizona and Idaho have also received harassment and threats. According to the Press Release of Lawrence Denney, Idaho’s Chief Election officer:
In recent days, Idaho’s four Republican Party electors have been receiving phone calls regarding their vote in the Electoral College from citizens within Idaho and outside of the state. Many of these phone calls are crossing into what could reasonably be considered harassment. The callers are trying to persuade the electors to become what is known as a “Faithless Elector”. Going against their pledge, “faithless electors” either abstain from or cast a ballot in opposition to their party’s designated nominee.
“While there is no Federal requirement binding electors to their pledge, and while Idaho is one of 21 states that does not have state‐level legislation to force an elector to comply, attempting to sway an elector’s commitment to their party through insults, vulgar language, or threats, simply lacks civility…” says Secretary Lawerence Denney, Idaho’s Chief Election officer.And all of this comes after a veritable deluge of online threats to assassinate Trump, calls for the rape and murder of his family members, and also massive numbers of calls for violence and murder of Trump supporters and their families.
Arrests have begun to take place:
Zachary Benson, 24, now faces five years in prison after a series of post-election tweets in which he stated an intent “to assassinate Trump.”We fear that this is only the beginning of a wave of “Weather Underground” style terrorism from the radical left, as they become increasingly unstable after losing power, and seek to subvert and overthrow our Constitutional Republic. Nonetheless, our general posture at the moment (and certainly between now and the inauguration on January, 20, 2017) is to avoid direct street level confrontation with violent leftists (which is what they want, so they and their media comrades can twist it into “right wing extremists attack peaceful protesters”). We prefer to give them plenty of rope, letting them further destroy their own credibility by their own increasingly insane actions.
“Diplomacy. Fucking Fools. I hate you all. I want to bomb every one of your voting booths and your general areas,” Benson Tweeted the Wednesday after the election under the handle @ZeeAyeKeyKay.
Benson also tweeted: “My life goal is to assassinate Trump. Don’t care if I serve infinite sentences. That man deserves to decease [sic] existing.”
Secret Service picked Benson up later that day for questioning.
As Napoleon said, “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” And yes, we regard the communist flag waving radicals now in the streets calling for violent Marxist revolution to be obvious domestic enemies of the Constitution. With every American flag they burn, they burn what little credibility they have left (especially in the eyes of our police and military). So, we will stay out of it and let the police handle it (unless we get a direct request for assistance from a police department). At most, we will protect homes and businesses under threat of violence and arson, and we will watch, wait, and prepare for the full Marxist terror storm we see on the horizon.
But when it comes to the sanctity of the vote, we must be proactive, right now, and do all we can to prevent the violent leftists from successfully terrorizing Electors and stealing the election through 11th hour illegitimate force and terrorism. That is a line we cannot let them cross. Not on our watch!
For the Republic,
Stewart Rhodes
Founder and President of Oath Keepers
NOTE: Oath Keepers members should NOT attempt to contact the Electors to offer protection (unless you already know them personally through your own civic involvement), and are especially discouraged from trying to do so using the spreadsheet Trump opponents have compiled, as the Electors’ personal information may have been illegally obtained. We do not want anyone to be able to accuse you of trying to influence Electors. Just let them contact us if they want protection.
https://www.oathkeepers.org/call-action-oath-keepers-protect-electors-terrorist-death-threats/
http://www.ammoland.com/2015/07/oath-keepers-operation-protect-the-protectors/#axzz4Qa4qqOHC
Craigslist Ad - STOP TRUMP - up to $1500/week
I think I will subscribe that phone number to many X rated websites and advertising agencies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
