“Give
up your dreams, if you must. Cease dreaming altogether. Call those
dreams and ambitions and visions…delusions. Then you will be ready. Then
you can truly serve humanity. You can fall back into the arms of the
many who will receive you with love. You’ll become an empty vessel
through which miracles are channeled. One day Oprah will interview you.”
******************
In a BBC documentary, “Google and the World
Brain,” the question of author-copyright is explored. Google has scanned
and published out-of-print books that are still covered by copyright.
Interviewed, Kevin Kelly (twitter) (also here and here), the co-founder of Wired, makes a startling remark. In his view
the whole issue of copyright is archaic. He explains that all authors
draw their ideas from previous authors and therefore don’t own their own
ideas.
It’s wonderful to witness such bloviating on the
cusp of the New Civilization, in which “you didn’t build that” is taken
to unprecedented levels.
Kelly should start a publishing firm; all his
authors would work for free. After all, nothing is original, nothing is
new, and these writers are merely rearranging other people’s words.
You might be surprised at how many people actually believe this tripe Kelly is passing along.
It’s part of the vastly expanding operation aimed at the individual.
The “modern” position is, we’re all one great big group.
Rimbaud was just redoing Shelley. Dylan Thomas
was adding a few exhibitionist touches to Shakespeare, who was aping
Sophocles. Plato was mimicking generations of Egyptian high priests.
Socrates was staging dialogues based on arguments between cave men.
And if we could climb into a time machine, we
could travel back to the age of the Neanderthals and see that
Neanderthals were stealing thoughts after listening to what ants and
gorillas and cabbages were saying.
Yes, it’s all spiritual collectivism, and we’re melting down into one cosmic goo-glob, and it’s marvelous.
“It’s all information” is the code phrase.
Ideas, thoughts, sentences, books; nothing is original, nothing is new;
we all “share” information floating in the collective consciousness; the
individual invents nothing.
The move to wipe out the entire concept of the
individual and erase it from human consciousness is a propaganda op. It
is far easier to wield control over a group.
It therefore comes down to the individual vs. the goo. So be it.
Actually, if anyone cares, “the people” is a convenient term for “every INDIVIDUAL.”
This has been lost in translation. It has been
garbled, distorted, just as the proprietor of an old-fashioned carnival
shell game distorts the audience’s perception with sleight of hand.
Are “the people” one group? Well, that’s the ultimate Globalist formulation.
However, from the point of view of the free individual, things are upside down. It is HIS power that is primary, not the monolithic corporate State’s.
From his point of view, what does the social landscape look like?
It looks like: THE OBSESSION TO ORGANIZE.
I’m not talking about organizations that are actually streamlined to produce something of value. I’m talking about organizations that PLAN MORE ORGANIZATION OF LIFE.
If you want to spend a disturbing afternoon,
read through (and try to fathom) the bewildering blizzard of
sub-organizations that make up the European Union. I did. And I emerged
with a new definition of insanity. OTO. The Obsession to Organize.
OTO speaks of a bottomless fear that somewhere, someone might be living free.
People tend to think their own power is either a
delusion or some sort of abstraction that’s never really EXPERIENCED.
So when the subject is broached, it goes nowhere. It fizzles out. It
garners shrugs and looks of confusion. Power? Are you talking about the
ability to lift weights?
And therefore, the whole notion of freedom makes
a very small impression, because without power, what’s the message of
freedom? A person can choose vanilla or chocolate? He can watch Law
& Order or CSI? He can buy a Buick or a Honda? He can take a trip to
Yosemite or Disney World? He can pack a lunch or eat out at a
restaurant? He can ask for a raise or apply for a better job with
another company? That’s it? He can swim in his pool or work out at the
gym?
He can take Prozac, or Paxil, or Zoloft?
Mostly, as the years roll by, he opts for more
cynicism and tries to become a “smarter realist.” And that is how he
closes the book on his life.
Every which way power can be discredited or misunderstood…people will discredit it and misunderstand it.
And then all psychological and physiological and
mental and physical and emotional and perceptual and hormonal processes
undergo a major shift, in order to accommodate to a reality, a space in
which the individual has virtually no power at all.
I’d be remiss if I didn’t include this one:
“power=greed.” Mountains of propaganda are heaped on people to convince
them that having individual power to make something happen is the same
as committing crimes against humanity.
Globalism=collectivism=Glob-consciousness. We’re all one Glob. We exist in that great Cheese Melt.
Even the radical Left of the 1960s, who rioted
at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, because they
believed the nominee, Hubert Humphrey, and his allies wouldn’t stop the
war in Vietnam…even that radical force on the Left eventually gave in
and morphed into romantic sentimentalists who came to love the State
under Clinton and Obama.
Sooner or later, it comes down to the question:
does the individual conceive of himself as an individual, or as part of
The Group?
Shall the individual discover how much power and
freedom and imagination he actually has, or shall he cut off that
process of discovery at the knees, in order to join a group whose aims
are diluted and foreshortened versions of consciousness and freedom?
The individual answers these questions overtly, with great consideration, or the questions answer and diminish him through wretched default.
The Surveillance State is a robot camera. It captures everything, based on the premise that what isn’t Normal is dangerous.
The cartels of the world become the cartels of the mind.
At the outbreak of World War 2, the Council on Foreign Relations began making plans for the post-war world.
The question it posed was this: could America
exist as a self-sufficient nation, or would it have to go outside its
borders for vital resources?
Predictably, the answer was: imperial empire.
The US would not only need to obtain natural
resources abroad, it would have to embark on endless conquest to assure
continued access.
The CFR, of course, wasn’t just some think tank.
It was connected to the highest levels of US government, through the
State Department. A front for Rockefeller interests, it actually stood
above the government.
Behind all its machinations was the presumption that planned societies were the future of the planet. Not open societies.
Through wars, clandestine operations,
legislation, treaties, manipulation of nations’ debt, control of banks
and money supplies, countries could be turned into “managed units.”
Increasingly, the populations of countries would be regulated and directed and held in thrall to the State.
And the individual? He would go the way of other extinct species.
For several decades, the pseudo-discipline
called “social science” had been turning out reams of studies and
reports on tribes, societal groupings, and so-called classes of people.
Groups.
Deeply embedded in the social sciences were
psychological warfare specialists who, after World War 2, emerged with a
new academic status and new field of study: mass communications.
Their objective? The broadcasting of messages
that would, in accordance with political goals, provoke hostility or
pacified acceptance in the masses.
Hostility channeled into support of new wars; acceptance of greater domestic government control.
Nowhere in these formulas was the individual
protected. He was considered a wild card, a loose cannon, and he needed
to be demeaned, made an outsider, and characterized as a criminal who
opposed the needs of the collective.
Collective=robot minds welded into one mind.
As the years and decades passed, this notion of
the collective and its requirements, in a “humane civilization,”
expanded. Never mind that out of view, the rich were getting richer and
poor were getting poorer. That fact was downplayed, and the cover
story–"share and care"—took center stage.
On every level of society, people were urged to
think of themselves as part of a greater group. The individual and his
hopes, his unique dreams, his desires and energies, his determination
and will power…all these were portrayed as relics of an unworkable and
deluded past.
In certain cases, lone pioneers who were
innovating in directions that could, in fact, benefit all of humanity,
were absorbed into the one body of the collective, heralded as
humane…and then dumped on the side of the road with their inventions and
forgotten.
In the planned society, no one rises above the mass, except those men who run and operate and propagandize the mass.
In order to affect the illusion of individual
success, as a kind of safety valve for the yearnings of millions of
people, the cult of individual celebrity emerged. But even there,
extraordinary tales of rise and then precipitous fall, glory and then
humiliation, were and are presented as cautionary melodramas.
This could happen to you. You would be exposed.
You would suffer the consequences. Let others take the fall. Keep your
mind blank. Do nothing unusual. Shorten your attention span. Disable
your own mental machinery. Then you’ll never be tempted to stand out
from the mass.
The onrush of technocracy gears its wild
promises to genetic manipulation, brain-machine interfaces, and other
automatic downloads assuring “greater life.” No effort required. Plug
in, and ascend to new heights.
Freedom? Independence? Old flickering dreams vicariously viewed on a screen.
Individual greatness, imagination, creative
power? A sunken galleon loaded with treasure that, upon closer
investigation, was never there to begin with.
The Plan is all that is important. The plan
involves universal surveillance, in order to map the lives of billions
of people, move by move, in order to design systems of control within
which those billions live, day to day.
But the worst outcome of all is: the individual
cannot even conceive of his own life and future in large terms. The
individual responds to tighter and control with a shrug, as if to say,
“What difference does it make?”
He has bought the collectivist package. His own
uniqueness and inner resources are submerged under layers of passive
acceptance of the consensus.
And make no mistake about it, this consensus
reality, for all its exaltation of the group, is not heraldic in any
sense. The propagandized veneer covers a cynical exploitation of every
man, woman, and child.
Strapped by an amnesia about his own freedom and
what it can truly mean, the individual opts for a place in the
collective gloom. He may grumble and complain, but he fits in.
He can’t remember another possibility.
Every enterprise in which he finds himself turns out to be a pale copy of the real thing.
The deep energies and power and desire for freedom remain untapped.
Yet a struggle continues to live. It lives in
the hidden places of every individual who wants out, who wants to come
back to himself, who wants to stride out on a stage.
Freedom and power again. The shattering of amnesia.
In this stolen world.
…Suggesting the premise of a new stage play:
The extinct individual returns.
Petty little hungers and obsessions become great hungers.
Dominoes of the collective begin to fall. The
stinking structure collapses, a wing here and a wing there, and the
robots open their eyes.
The vast sticky web called “the people” begins to disintegrate in roaring cities and in the mind.
A new instructive message appears on billboards and screens:
“Normal=Crazy.”
The author of three explosive collections, THE
MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon
was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the
purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated
for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30
years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS
Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and
magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars
on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences
around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at
NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.
