Thursday, January 7, 2016

CHEMTRAILS: REPORT RELEASED OF DNA CHANGES AND OTHER ADVERSE HEALTH ISSUES


THIS IS A MUST SEE - EVERY AMERICAN IS BEING AFFECTED BY THE DANGEROUS CHEMTRAILS - YOU ARE BEING USED AS A LAB RAT - YOU, YOUR FAMILY, FRIENDS AND ALL OF AMERICA
 
EVERYONE OF US IN THE UNITED STATES IS BEING ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE CHEMTRAILS - THE FOLLOWING REPORT DESCRIBES SOME OF THE ILL EFFECTS OF THE CHEMICALS BEING SPRAYED AND HOW IT IS AFFECTING YOUR DNA AND HEALTH IN GENERAL

Following is a report on the dangerous and deadlly affects of the chemtrails, in particular a program of the U.S.A.  The video is a three hour long presentation by Dr.  Dietrich Klinghardt exposing the damage caused to human DNA, and may well be affecting you and your children right now in America. This is biowarfare folks, and YOU are the targets, victims - the LAB RATS.

***********************************************************************************
Written report follows:

WHAT'S BEHIND BRAZIL'S ALARMING SURGE IN BABIES BORN WITH SMALL HEADS

 
Zika typically causes flulike aches and rash, but the rapidly spreading disease is fueling global worries about tiny-headed infants and brain damage 
 
Dina Fine Maron on January 6, 2016
 
In this Dec. 23, 2015 photo, Dejailson Arruda holds his daughter Luiza at their house in Santa Cruz do Capibaribe, Pernambuco state, Brazil. Luiza was born in October with a rare condition, known as microcephaly. Luiza's mother Angelica Pereira was infected with the Zika virus after a mosquito bite. Brazilian health authorities are convinced that Luiza's condition is related to the Zika virus that infected her mother during pregnancy.  (AP Photo/Felipe Dana)

Thousands of Brazil’s newborns last year had abnormally tiny heads and potentially debilitating brain damage. In 2015 the country reported nearly 3,000 cases of the incurable condition, called microcephaly—about 20 times more than the prior year. In the nation’s northeast, where most of the cases occurred, government officials have already declared a state of emergency. Now international researchers and Brazilian authorities are rushing to tamp down the problem.

The trouble is they are not sure exactly what is causing the phenomenon or how to address it. They do have one strong suspect—a mosquito-borne disease called Zika that usually causes short-term rashes and joint aches, and is plaguing the same areas in Brazil. There is already evidence the virus can cross the placental barrier: Zika has been detected in the amniotic fluid of two pregnant women with microcephalic fetuses in the state of Paraiba. What’s more, viruses from the same genus have the ability to replicate once they reach the central nervous system, providing some indication of how the viruses could potentially cause microcephaly in the first place.

Zika disease, however, has never been known to cause microcephaly before.

(Microcephaly is typically caused by exposure to toxic substances during pregnancy, genetic abnormalities or diseases during pregnancy like rubella or herpes). Then again, scientists also know very little about Zika. In fact, until 2007 there were only sporadic cases of people infected with the virus (at least ones that were laboratory confirmed), with small outbreaks in Africa and Southeast Asia since being discovered in 1947 in Uganda.

Now, the Zika virus is rapidly advancing across new terrain. In May 2015 Brazil reported its first case of Zika and by December 2015 the virus had made its way into several countries in Central and South America, such as Colombia and Mexico, and even showed up on the island of Puerto Rico. The rapid spread suggests a change in the Zika virus, one which scientists are racing against the clock to pinpoint. Worryingly, Zika has also been linked with the future development of Guillain–BarrĂ© syndrome, an autoimmune disease that could lead to paralysis.

Researchers know a virus like Zika could mutate to become more fit, essentially allowing it to transmit more easily from one host to another in order to survive. But a mutation designed specifically to help it cross the natural placental barrier between mother and fetus would not necessarily be too beneficial for the virus because it has been successfully transmitted in more traditional ways, says Scott Weaver, an expert on mosquito-borne viral diseases at The University of Texas Medical Branch (U.T.M.B.) at Galveston. A more likely possibility for its rapid reach, he says, is that the virus may have adapted in recent years to have a higher level of viremia, or more virus present in any given drop of blood.

That would allow Zika to be transmitted at a greater rate because it would increase the chances of a mosquito picking up the virus and transmitting it to another person after biting an infected human. A fringe benefit of this viremia would be that although the virus would not have any innate increase in its ability to cross the placental barrier, its high concentration may boost its chances of making the leap. Weaver’s team at U.T.M.B. is studying the virus now in the hopes of pinning down such answers.

But that work will not determine if Zika is definitely fueling the microcephaly cases. For that, still other researchers at U.T.M.B., at the request of Brazilian authorities, are part of a larger team attempting to shore up the connection between Zika and microcephaly. Two U.T.M.B. researchers, Nikos Vasilakis and Shannan Rossi, were in Brazil over Christmas helping to set up diagnostic capabilities to test umbilical cord blood for signs of Zika at birth.

The signs they are looking for lie in the newborns’ antibodies. Because the antibodies for Zika virus look so much like those for dengue or yellow fever, (both common in Brazil) it is hard to detect if a pregnant woman has contracted Zika or had one of those other conditions in the past. But lab testing of cord blood antibodies that show up in response to a recent exposure—called immunoglobulin M antibodies, or IgM—would allow scientists to detect if the fetus was infected with Zika and that it happened recently (unlike tests that would pick up longer term antibodies transmitted from the mom). Theoretically, those tests, too, may also pick up similar-looking dengue virus and confuse the results, Weaver says, but the chance of such a false positive is rare because fetal dengue infection is so uncommon. “By trying to diagnose more of these cases at birth by sampling cord blood, they may learn more about how these fetuses were infected,” he says.

Even without that data there is already some indication the Zika–microcephaly connection is more than just geographical coincidence. There have also been reports of genetic material from Zika being detected in the blood tissue of a microcephalic baby from the northern Brazilian state of ParĂ¡. (That infant died within five minutes of birth.) And, anecdotally, some of the women who went on to birth children with microcephaly also remembered having a rash during pregnancy—a potential but not definitive symptom of Zika. In addition, beyond Brazil there have been reports in French Polynesia of an unusual uptick in central nervous system problems among babies born in the past couple years in areas associated with Zika outbreaks. Further lab testing of those mothers found that at least some of them may have had asymptomatic Zika virus.

But this information, by itself, is not yet airtight. In Brazil further investigations continue even as the government rolls out public health education and mosquito control efforts. If the new cord blood information and other research soon firms up the Zika–microcephaly connection, perhaps that will add further impetus to develop a vaccine for Zika—possibly by adapting one already in use for Zika’s cousin, dengue
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-s-behind-brazil-s-alarming-surge-in-babies-born-with-small-heads/

***********************************************************************************
Accompanying comment on this report follows:

THE ABOVE REPORT IS BS.  TWO BRAZILIAN POLITICIANS WERE PAID OFF TO KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT.  

In 2006 there was a test,  an experiment carried out by US companies called  to “Evaluation on DNA damage in an Ecuadorian population exposed to glyphosate" by aerial spraying. 

Then this same company sprayed their own people in the US.   Proof at about 1:26:40. (maybe start at 1:22:00)

Quote “Higher degree of DNA damage in the exposed group”
Copyright by the Brazilian Society of Genetics.

PLEASE CONSIDER WATCHING THE FOLLOWING REPORT
EVEN IF YOU HAVE TO DO IT IN SEGMENTS
DUE TO ITS LENGTH

Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt
Vortrag/Lecture Deutsch/English

 


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-s-behind-brazil-s-alarming-surge-in-babies-born-with-small-heads/



California governor declares gas leak a state of emergency


California governor declares gas leak a state of emergency




Jan 6 2016


LOS ANGELES (AP) — California Gov. Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency Wednesday over a massive natural-gas leak that has been spewing methane and other gases into a Los Angeles neighborhood for months, sickening residents and forcing thousands to evacuate.

In a statement, Brown said he acted based on the requests of people in the community of Porter Ranch and the "prolonged and continuing" nature of the gas blowout at the underground storage facility.

The well, owned by Southern California Gas Co., has been gushing up to 1,200 tons of climate-changing methane daily, along with other gases, since it was first reported in October. It will be months before workers can stem the leak, experts say.

Along with other measures underway, Brown told the gas company to come up with backup plans in case efforts to close the blowout fail and ordered emergency regulations for other gas-storage facilities throughout the state.

The utility is paying to relocate thousands of households after residents complained of nosebleeds, nausea and other ailments from the fumes.

Los Angeles County and the Los Angeles school board already have declared the crisis an emergency, moving students out of two schools in the neighborhood.

The gas leak is "one of the most devastating environmental disasters in the history of California," Los Angeles Councilman Mitchell Englander said Wednesday.

Englander is one of a growing number of local officials and community members who urged the governor to act. Resident Matt Pakucko is another. He leads a community group that has been pushing for the state declaration and said he cried when he heard about the order.

Pakucko, speaking from a hotel where the gas company had moved him and his girlfriend, said he faced doubts from his community about pressing the governor to declare an emergency.

"I'm not worried about being validated or vindicated, but that people get what they need," he said. "And that's what we've been pushing for."

The massive leak amounts to about a quarter of the state's total output of methane, one of the most potent gases in climate change. The site is one of the country's largest underground natural-gas storage facilities and can hold enough natural gas to fuel Southern California for a month.

The crisis has threatened growing embarrassment for Brown, an international advocate of reducing the use of natural gas and other fossil fuels.

Brown toured the site of the leak for the first time earlier this week and met privately with residents in the area. The governor previously resisted local calls for a state declaration, saying he wanted to make sure the utility, rather than the state, bore the financial cost.

In his order, the governor said that California expected the utility to pay expenses related to the leak and that the state would ensure the utility's customers were protected from paying higher rates as a result.

Southern California Gas President Dennis Arriola said in a statement Wednesday that the company was focusing on stopping the leak and minimizing the harm to residents. The utility would work with the state to offset the long-term environmental impact of the methane, Arriola said.

Brown's order also forbids any additional injection of natural gas into the storage site for the time being. It directs state air officials to update the public regularly on the health risks and to plan a way to offset the huge emissions of methane.

The governor also directed a long-term look at the future of gas-storage sites in the state, including whether the fossil-fuel facilities fit Brown's ambitious plans to ramp up the use of solar, wind and other, cleaner energy sources. (Deliberately failing to consider the many alternative FREE ENERGY resources that have been denied the public for many years.)

One of Brown's strongest critics in the leak, Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, said the crisis is a "massive failure" of state oversight. On Wednesday, he called for an independent review of gas-storage sites and wells across California


http://news.yahoo.com/california-governor-declares-gas-leak-state-emergency-214733623.html


Oregon tribe: Armed group 'desecrating' their land



OREGON  TRIBE:  ARMED  GROUP  'DESECRATING'  THEIR  LANDS ??!!

Another uninformed ignorant American accusing the WRONG people who, in her ignorance, would fire on the individiuals who are risking their lives to save her land and the tribe's rights to that land while the REAL ENEMY laughs in glee over her ignorance. She even displays the wrong American flag, the flag of the tribe's enemy.





(AP) — The leader of an American Indian tribe that regards an Oregon nature preserve as sacred issued a rebuke Wednesday to the armed men who are 'occupying the property', saying they are not welcome at the snowy bird sanctuary and must leave.

The Burns Paiute tribe was the latest group to speak out against the men who have taken several buildings at the preserve to protest policies governing the use of federal land in the West. (The land is NOT 'federal' - anything BUT. These ignorant reporters and all Americans need to get the facts and the truth straight.)

"The protesters have no right to this land. It belongs to the native people who live here," tribal leader Charlotte Rodrique said.

She spoke at a news conference at the tribe's cultural center, about a half-hour drive from Malheur National Wildlife Refuge which is being occupied by some 20 men led by Ammon Bundy, whose father Cliven was at the center of a standoff in Nevada with federal officials in 2014 over use of public lands.

Ammon Bundy is demanding that the refuge be handed over to locals.

Rodrique said she "had to laugh" at the demand, because she knew Bundy was not talking about giving the land to the tribe. (She is ignorant and needs to be educated to the TRUTH)

The 13,700-acre Burns Paiute Reservation is north of the remote town of Burns in Oregon sagebrush country. The reservation is separate from the wildlife refuge, but tribal members consider it part of their ancestral land. 

As with other tribes, the Burns Paiutes' link to the land is marked by a history of conflict with white settlers and the U.S. government. In the late 1800s, they were forced off a sprawling reservation created by an 1872 treaty that was never ratified. Some later returned and purchased property in the Burns area, where about 200 tribal members now live.

Bundy's group seized buildings Saturday at the nature preserve in eastern Oregon's high desert country. Authorities have made no attempt to remove them.

At a community meeting attended by hundreds of people in Burns on Wednesday evening, cheers erupted when Harney County Sheriff David Ward said it was time for the group at the refuge to "pick up and go home."  (David Ward - a traitor, agent provocateur)

"We can work through it like adults, peacefully, with a united front," Ward said.

The standoff in rural Oregon is a continuation of a long-running dispute over federal policies covering the use of public lands, including grazing. The federal government controls about half of all land in the West. For example, it owns 53 percent of Oregon, 85 percent of Nevada and 66 percent of Utah, according to the Congressional Research Service.

The Bundy family is among many people in the West who contend local officials could do a better job of managing public lands than the federal government. "It is our goal to get the logger back to logging, the rancher back to ranching," Ammon Bundy said Tuesday.

The argument is rejected by those who say the U.S. government is better equipped to manage public lands for all those who want to make use of them.

Among those groups are Native Americans.

The Burns Paiute tribe has guaranteed access to the refuge for activities that are important to their culture, including gathering a plant used for making traditional baskets and seeds that are used for making bread. The tribe also hunts and fishes there.

Rodrique said the armed occupiers are "desecrating one of our sacred sites" with their presence at refuge.

Jarvis Kennedy, a tribal council member, said: "We don't need these guys here. They need to go home and get out of here."

Randy Eardley, a Bureau of Land Management spokesman, said Bundy's call for control of the land to be transferred makes no sense.

"It is frustrating when I hear the demand that we return the land to the people, because it is in the people's hand — the people own it," Eardley said. "Everybody in the United States owns that land. ... We manage it the best we can for its owners, the people, and whether it's for recreating, for grazing, for energy and mineral development."

Bundy's group, calling itself Citizens for Constitutional Freedom, says it wants an inquiry into whether the government is forcing ranchers off their land after Dwight Hammond and his son, Steven, reported back to prison Monday.

The Hammonds, who have distanced themselves from the group, were convicted of arson three years ago and served no more than a year. A judge later ruled that the terms fell short of minimum sentences requiring them to serve about four more years.
___
Petty reported from Portland, Oregon
Associated Press

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2016-01-06-US-Ranching-Standoff/id-bc7c361d3c5f47f4a133e0b873c69882


Hillary Likely to Be Indicted in Next 60 Days



BREAKING:  Hillary  Likely  to  Be  Indicted  in  Next  60  Days,  Says  Federal                          Prosecutor

on January 6, 2016


Hillary Rodham Clinton could be indicted within the next 60 days.

You read that right. According to Joe DiGenova, a former federal prosecutor, this is not a conservative fantasy. In fact, DiGenova says it is “very likely,” according to his experience and sources in the FBI.
A Republican former U.S. attorney believes Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton could be facing imminent indictment over her email scandal, possibly roiling the Iowa caucuses or the New Hampshire primary in February.
Joe DiGenova, a one-time federal prosecutor originally appointed by President Reagan, told conservative radio host Laura Ingraham Tuesday that the FBI’s still-pending investigation of Clinton’s formeemail server seems to have reached ‘a critical mass.’
Congressional Republicans last spring discovered that Clinton used a private, home-based email server in her New York home while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. The scandal has dogged her presidential campaign for almost the entire past year.
The FBI has been probing whether any classified intelligence was compromised through Clinton’s unusual email setup, but she has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing and has yet to be charged with any crime.
hillary 

DiGenova said that may be about to change.
‘They have reached a critical mass in their investigation of the secretary and all of her senior staff,” DiGenova said Tuesday on Ingraham’s show. ‘And, it’s going to come to a head, I would suggest, in the next 60 days.’
FBI Director James Comey has resisted efforts to lay out a timeline for his agency’s probe of the Clinton case, but if it is as imminent as DiGenova believes, it could devastate Clinton’s campaign.
The Iowa caucuses are on Feb. 1 and the New Hampshire primary is on Feb. 9.  ‘It’s going to be a very complex matter for the Department of Justice, but they’re not going to be able to walk away from it,’ DiGenova said.
‘They are now at over 1,200 classified emails. And, that’s just for the ones we know about from the State Department. That does not include the ones that the FBI is, in fact, recovering from her hard drives.’
One telling event would be a personal interview between Clinton and the FBI. Although the former secretary of state famously testified at an 11-hour congressional hearing in October, she has not yet been interviewed by federal agents.
A recommendation for prosecution would not only roil the presidential race, but would put President Barack Obama in an unbelievably difficult position. Decisions about prosecution, DiGenova noted, do not lie with the FBI but with the Justice Department – headed by Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
‘I believe that the evidence that the FBI is compiling will be so compelling that, unless [Lynch] agrees to the charges, there will be a massive revolt inside the FBI, which she will not be able to survive as an attorney general. It will be like Watergate. It will be unbelievable,’ he said.
‘The evidence against the Clinton staff and the secretary is so overwhelming at this point that if, in fact, she chooses not to charge Hillary, they will never be able to charge another federal employee with the negligent handling of classified information,’ DiGenova continued.
‘The intelligence community will not stand for that. They will fight for indictment and they are already in the process of gearing themselves to basically revolt if she refuses to bring charges.
FBI Director James Comey is by all accounts angry at how the administration has dragged its feet on bringing charges. And reportedly, this conflict could soon come to a head. One GOP Senator is even urging Comey to go public with his information, but Democrats are urging him not to, as it would destroy Hillary, and with her the Democrat’s hope to retain the presidency.

These are high stakes indeed. The next 60 days will be very dramatic for the future of this nation.

http://toprightnews.com/breaking-hillary-likely-to-be-indicted-in-next-60-days-says-federal-prosecutor/

HAMMOND RANCH, OATH KEEPERS AND STEWART RHODES



HAMMOND RANCH, OATH KEEPERS AND STEWART RHODES

Wed Jan 6 2016

My opinion of Stewart is that he is a Yale Law School graduate and a Bar Association Member and he is engaged in Controlled Opposition.

My further opinion is that the ONLY reason that this is "not the issue" for Oathkeepers to support is that the natural resources the corporation Stewart actually works for is after in this case are SO very juicy.

My final opinion on the matter is that when a man or woman takes an Oath to uphold The Constitution, they must uphold it or be exposed as Oath-breakers instead of Oathkeepers.

The Jurisdiction of the Land owed to the People of the Oregon State is being violated by federal over-reach and that is a violation of The Constitution and the Law of the Land in general.   

The longevity of the mis-administration and fraud committed against the western states by the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and now, by its United Nations Trustees in receivership, in no way affects the standing and the political status of those men who have taken over the BLM facilities in protest of armed acts of "criminal aggression" in the words of the Nuremburg Trial, perpetuated by employees of the "Bureau of Land Management" which is nothing but a trademarked name acquired by the IMF as part of its deal with the entirely criminal and fraudulent Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration at Bretton Woods.

Read that as--- the "Bureau of Land Management" is precisely the same as a company name like "Stanley Tools" or "Kentucky Fried Chicken" that has been acquired by backdoor deals among private, mostly foreign-owned banking cartels in the business of providing "governmental services", and then "traded upon". 

The sharks come in, buy a recognized brand name like "Stanley Tools" which has enjoyed a good reputation for many years, and then start producing cheap knock offs that they sell at premium prices to the unsuspecting public, which is never made aware of the change of ownership and administration of the company and the brand.

In the same way the "governmental services organizations" have changed ownership and management and even the law under which they operate, all without telling the public a word about it, and thus defrauding the people they are supposedly serving.

The Members of "Congress" and the various "Presidents" since Roosevelt have been actively engaged in selling off brands like "Bureau of Land Management" and "U.S. Small Business Administration" and so on to foreign entities that then manage these "governmental services corporations" as they see fit.  For example, back in the late 1980's they sold the "U.S. Small Business Administration" to Lehman Brothers Bank.

Lehman Brothers has always had a terrible reputation throughout the industry and nobody in their right mind would take their word for anything, much less enter into any kind of loan arrangement with the crooks---- but by buying a perfectly respectable "government" brand, they were able to snooker millions of unsuspecting Americans into various kinds of home loans and business development loans that they would have never touched, had they known that Lehman Brothers was involved.

Same thing with "BLM" and "FBI"---  People hear the name and assume that it is a government agency and that is trustworthy and that it "must be acting within the law". 

They never stop to question anything about it, never realize that they are being complete bamboozled, never catch on to the fact that "Congress" is totally out of control and lawless and that these "agencies" are being operated by foreign business enterprises and even foreign governments under international law that has nothing whatsoever to do with the Constitution and Law of the Land that the people are owed.

The entire "US District Court System" which is responsible for the operation of all the Federal State and Federal County Courts within their "districts" is in fact more properly named the "United States District of Columbia Municipal Corporation District Court"---- and since the District has been bankrupted and dissolved, it should even more properly be called something like "United States Federal Reserve System District Court", because that is who owns and is operating all these "courts" all across America. 

Now, ask yourselves--- why would you be doing business with a "court" that is obviously an in-house corporate tribunal having nothing to do with the land jurisdiction of the United States or the people living here

Are you an employee of the Federal Reserve System?  Probably not. 

But you have been misidentified and mischaracterized by the former tenant--- the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation --- as a British Crown Subject, and British Crown Subjects holding a "residence" on the land of the organic states are property --- literally chattel --- belonging to the Federal Reserve System. 

That's why their "courts" summon the Strawman Estate Trusts these criminals created in your name without your knowledge or consent into their "courts" and charge you with the 80,000,000 different regulations and code infractions that they have developed as a means of "criminalizing" you and extracting money from you and from your public treasury.

Remember that these multi-nationals are in the business of providing "governmental services"----and they will provide those services using strong-arm tactics whether you want them or not.  
 
Remember Obamacare?  Hmm? Nothing like taking over the entire medical insurance racket in America to pad the old bottom line.

Remember the prison system? 

Why is it that we have far more people in jail than any other country on Earth? 


Because it is Big Money for these criminal corporations --- especially the Federal Reserve.  First, they charge you with a "crime" under their in-house corporate system of administrative law---- which is not your system of law at all.  Then, they attack the phony publicly managed "Estate Trust" or "Transmitting Utility" they set up "in your name". 

According to their in-house "law", this "United States Citizen" can't even complain about their mistreatment.  They are guilty from the moment they step foot in a courtroom and are already pre-sentenced.  Read the 1868 Corporate Constitution's 14th Amendment.

(two very important paragraphs here)

They try to get you to pay for whatever "infraction" they charge against the phony ESTATE or TRANSMITTING UTILITY they are operating in your name, and they charge your public treasury $25,000.00 per misdemeanor and over a million for each felony for the service of merely bringing charges. 

Then they incarcerate you as chattel ("cargo" in their lingo) belonging to the "guilty estate"---- and charge your public treasury up the wazoo for the "service" of keeping you in jail, plus they steal the value of all the labor they squeeze out of you while in jail.

These are your EMPLOYEES, for God's sake. 

Stand up and boot them to the curb.  They want to claim that you are a "14th Amendment Citizen"--- make them prove it.  Where and when did you or your ancestors ever perform the duty imposed by the Public Law of this land--- 2 United States Statutes-at-Large 153, Subchapter 28, ss. 1? 

You didn't and neither did your great-grandparents.  It was all a corporate fraud that had no affect on any living American's political status at all.  And it still is nothing but a corporate fraud and false claim.

--Where, exactly, did you ever knowingly grant them permission to use your given name? 
--Where did you grant them any power of attorney?
 
--Where is the fully disclosed two party contract providing equitable exchange with your signature on it? 

 
Let them produce it, in court, black and white.

Wake up, people, and stop trusting the brand names of things.  Start looking at what is real and what is right in front of your face. 

If the "FBI" were working for the people of this nation and acting according to the Public Law we have established instead of taking their direction from crooked corporate bosses, they would be prosecuting the banks for mammoth securities and banking industry fraud instead of trying to steal natural resources from poor farmers at the points of guns and under the fraudulent presentation that they are "the government" instead of hired commercial mercenaries operating under color of law.  

http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/01/todays-missoulian-about-oregon-situation.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+http%2Fpaulstramerfeedburnercom+%28http%3A%2F%2Fwww.paulstramer.net++++Paul+Stramer+personal+blog%29


NASA Scientist Admits to Spraying Lithium


CHEMTRAILS EXPOSED!
NASA SCIENTIST ADMITS TO SPRAYING LITHIUM
POINTS TO WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY
 
 


THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE MANY TIMES! 

THE NASA SCIENTIST GIVES AWAY A LOT OF INFO IN THIS CALL. 

HE EVEN SLIPS UP AND MENTIONS WALLOP FLIGHT FACILITY AND SAYS ALL THE "CHEMTRAIL" WORK IS DONE AT CLEMSON UNIVERSITY! 





H.R. 1205 TO END MEMBERSHIP OF THE UNITED STATES IN THE UNITED NATIONS

 
Can you please send this out to everyone you know?
 
Mike Rogers, Arkansas, is carrying H.R.1205 to rid America of the U.N.
There are 6 states supporting it.
 
I left a message with our representatives but it would help if thousands from many states call their reps and encourage them to support H.R.1205 as well. 
It's in Foreign Affairs Committee now.
*****************************************

H.R.1205 - American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015  -  114th Congress (2015-2016)

  BILL

Text: H.R.1205 — 114th Congress (2015-2016)

All Bill Information (Except Text)

There is one version of the bill.

Text available as:

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (03/02/2015)


114th CONGRESS
1st Session


H. R. 1205

To end membership of the United States in the United Nations

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 2, 2015
 
Mr. Rogers of Alabama (for himself, Mr. Massie, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Westmoreland, and Mr. Huelskamp) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

A BILL
 
To end membership of the United States in the United Nations

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 
SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2015”.

SEC. 2. Repeal of United Nations Participation Act of 1945.

(a) Repeal.—The United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (Public Law 79–264; 22 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is repealed.

(b) Termination of membership in United Nations.—The President shall terminate all membership by the United States in the United Nations, and in any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.

(c) Closure of United States Mission to United Nations.—The United States Mission to the United Nations is closed. Any remaining functions of such office shall not be carried out. 

SEC. 3. Repeal of United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act.
 

(a) Repeal.—The United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act (Public Law 80–357) is repealed.

(b) Withdrawal.—The United States withdraws from the agreement between the United States of America and the United Nations regarding the headquarters of the United Nations (signed at Lake Success, New York, on June 26, 1947, which was brought into effect by the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act). 

SEC. 4. United States assessed and voluntary contributions to the United Nations.
 
No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for assessed or voluntary contributions of the United States to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, except that funds may be appropriated to facilitate termination of United States membership and withdrawal of United States personnel and equipment, in accordance with sections 2 and 3, respectively. Upon termination of United States membership, no payments shall be made to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, out of any funds appropriated prior to such termination or out of any other funds available for such purposes. 

SEC. 5. United Nations peacekeeping operations
 

(a) Termination.—No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any United States contribution to any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force.

(b) Terminations of United States participation in United Nations peacekeeping operations.—No funds may be obligated or expended to support the participation of any member of the Armed Forces of the United States as part of any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force. No member of the Armed Forces of the United States may serve under the command of the United Nations.

SEC. 6. Withdrawal of United Nations presence in facilities of the government of the United States and repeal of diplomatic immunity.

(a) Withdrawal from United States Government property.—The United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) may not occupy or use any property or facility of the United States Government.

(b) Diplomatic immunity.—No officer or employee of the United Nations (including any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations) or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled “Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations”, signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287 note), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970 (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or to any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or of any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations, or to the families, suites, or servants of such officers or employees. 

SEC. 7. Repeal of United States membership and participation in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
 
The joint resolution entitled “A joint resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, and authorizing an appropriation therefor”, approved July 30, 1946 (Public Law 79–565, 22 U.S.C. 287m et seq.), is repealed. 

SEC. 8. Repeal of United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973
 
The United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973 (22 U.S.C. 287 note) is repealed. 

SEC. 9. Repeal of United States participation in the World Health Organization
 
The joint resolution entitled “Joint Resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the World Health Organization and authorizing an appropriation therefor”, approved June 14, 1948 (22 U.S.C. 290), is repealed. 

SEC. 10. Repeal of involvement in United Nations conventions and agreements.

Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States will end any participation in any conventions and agreements with the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations. Any remaining functions of such conventions and agreements shall not be carried out.

SEC. 11. Reemployment with United States Government after service with an international organization.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the rights of employees under subchapter IV of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, relating to reemployment after service with an international organization.

SEC. 12. Notification.

Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall notify the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations of the provisions of this Act.

SEC. 13. Effective date.

Except as otherwise provided, this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date that is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1205/text

 

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

COME ON MAN !!!



 
COME ON MAN !!!
To Gen D & Elders,

The Cabal will always use death threats, and they feel its their right. Ok, pull up your big boy pants, get this finished, release the TRN's NOW, fund Republic,
release money to the people, then full assault on the cabal, arrest, or use force. PROBLEM SOLVED!
Have you forgot these scum have been multiple way of torturing us, the people, for decades using false allegations,
Admiralty Law, IRS, DHS, financial attacks, chemtrails, etc. to control us.
Don't you think its time to take back our country or are you afraid of your shadow or did you all go to the dark side?
Come on Man!

WHAT THE HELL....





WHAT THE HELL???
All comments and critique is in red.
 
In regard to the current Hammond Ranch standoff in Oregon - Ammon Bundy of the attack against the Bundy Ranch in Nevada April 2014 - has reportedly told Pete Santilli that the Feds are getting ready to make a move on them at the Wildlife Refuge tonight. This can't turn out good. It smacks of another Waco and Ruby Ridge, and most of us know full well what the outcome was in those situations.
 
It is time the FBI, DHS, and the DOJ;
CEASE AND DESIST ALL ACTIONS AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THIS NATION.
Section 8, clause 17 states;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular states, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;
-And
To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
 
This section and clause states nothing about purchasing land for its mineral, timber or gas resources. This means the FBI, DHS and DOJ has no authority to invade or to use UNITED NATIONS Mercenaries to engage in live fire combat against the lawful Peace Keepers and enforcers of this nation LAWS. The Militia which is defined and established by the Constitution is in keeping with the Constitution and has full authority to detain arrest and take into custody all aggressive actors regardless their nationality.
 
The FBI, DHS and DOJ and UNITED NATIONS Mercenaries have no authority and are subject to prosecution for all actions taken in aggression against these Peace Keepers and the people.
 
This nation is already in civil war within, yet 99% of Americans don't have a frick'n clue.
 
This statement while true fails to recognize the inbreed laziness, apathy and stupidity most Americans have brought upon themselves by their actions of trading LIBERTY for easy living. These jerks deserve their lot but will still be protected by those who are willing to go the extra mile to be their brothers and sisters keepers.
 
That being said all surrounding state militias must actively and aggressively Muster their members and stand ready to engage the scum that choses to do the bidding of the most vile and despicable "person" on this continent.
It behooves all other states in the Union to do likewise and aggressively and actively Muster their Militia and stand ready to protect the People from this criminal assault.
 
In the Bundy and Hammond Ranches situations, those nations who have been 'trading' with the worthless derivatives offered by the private corporation Federal Reserve in the name of our government, and thusly have incurred their anticipated computer generated 'losses', are using the situation to demand recompense.  Since both the Federal Reserve and the 'government', both private corporations and private businesses - not our nation's rightful national government nor treasury - are supposedly 'bankrupt' and refuse to pay their debts, it falls upon the people and our nation's land and mineral assets to be seized by foreign governments. This is where the ranch lands come in to the picture - seize the land for recompense for bad debts.
 
Here a statement that has merit yet there is no proof of this being the actual case. While highly suspect actions are involved this nation is still a nation that has laws and those laws have limits of action that can be taken by international equity/debt collectors.
Those international nations made a deal with a corporation and that corporation does not re-present the People. This Continent is defined by long standing defined borders whether or not there is a record held by the archives it is common knowledge that We the People have claimed and defended this continent against all encroachment.
Therefore the corporation that created the obligation did so in fraud and all international law agrees that fraud vitiates all contract obligations. This is where the People have a claim also against the corporation. The standard modus operandi has been for the bankers and legal industry scum to create corporations that shield the pirates and profiteers that make these criminal acts and this has to be challenged by the People. The standard necessary to put a stop to this is for the People to establish a new international law/agreement that such actions DO NOT PROTECT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR STOCK HOLDERS WHEN THE ENTIRE ACTION HAS BEEN PERPETRATED IN FRAUD! In this case the Rothschild's, Rockefeller's and the ten other banking families are the fraudsters and need to stand good for all debt created by their corrupt UNITED STATES, INC puppet. 
 
Another angle to consider is the bozo admin planned gun confiscation. Create chaos - order out of chaos. If the situation in Oregon is taken to the next level and the bloodbath breaks out, the entire nation will rise up. Civil war will be the order of the day, and every race and 'cause' in this nation will be reason for guns, shootings, rapes and beheadings. The entire nation will go up in flames.
 
Possible and I pray that this is not the case. However the scum of this world will not stop until it is directly confronted. This is supposed to be the province of the New Interim President General Dunford who has yet to convince those of us who are observing and putting the pieces together that he does in FACT have the Republic at heart. What Say Ye Dunford? Think you can prove to the People you are capable and don't say you need money because this is not necessary and you DAM WELL KNOW IT!!!
 
When enough of this bloodbath occurs and neutralizes America, then China and Russia will show up to finish the job.
 
Not when there will be the largest standing, armed, PISSED OFF people still remaining and supposedly there are agreements in place that addresses this. REALLY? NOT DISCLOSED AND NOTICED TO THE PUBLIC FOR RATIFICATION BY THE PEOPLE.
WHEN WILL YOU GET YOUR COLLECTIVE, POLITICALLY CORRECT HEADS OUT OF YOUR SPHINCTERS???
 
If you can do nothing else, PLEASE PRAY - PLEASE FAST - PLEASE TAKE THIS SITUATION SERIOUSLY.
 
Your life and those of your family, friends and fellow countrymen are at stake now like never before. This is dead serious.
 
There has been several states that have taken this very seriously for the past seven years and gave people the correct information as to EXACTLY WHAT THEY NEEDED TO DO and yet here we are still dealing with corporate franchise state government and all wringing their hands muttering "woe is me, what can I do?" Get off your can and throw your state government out of office! DAM THEIR STATUES THAT SAY OTHERWISE!
THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE STATES "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world."
PRAY! CIRCULATE THIS WORD! CONTACT THE CHURCHES AND VARIOUS MINISTRIES!
 
At this point DEFINITALY PRAY!!!
 
Served Honorably and Still Serving Honorably