Tuesday, January 12, 2016

GIVE’EM HELL


GIVE’EM HELL, Judge Jeanine



FOX News host Jeanine Pirro blasts the dhmmi Mayor of Philadelphia for trying to appease Muslims by lying to the American public, pretending that the Muslim would-be assassin of a police officer who “did it for Allah and ISIS” had nothing to do with Islam.

Judge Jeanine is the best FOX commentator for exposing the evil that is inherent in Islam as well as the Muslim Brotherhood scum in this country doing business as designated terrorist group CAIR.

 Judge Jeanine Blasts Philly Mayor 
Over ISIS-Inspired Police Shooting


http://shoebat.com/2016/01/09/giveem-hell-judge-jeanine/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+shoebat+%28Walid+Shoebat%29


How I learned to mind my own business .........






A little three year old son .............






It’s One Indivisible System


You Can’t Separate Empire, the State, Financialization and Crony Capitalism: It’s One Indivisible System

Disagreement is part of discourse, and pursuing differing views of the best way forward is the heart of democracy. Disagreement is abundant, democracy is scarce, despite claims to the contrary.

If you think you can surgically extract Empire from the American System, force the State to serve the working/middle classes, end the stripmining of financialization, limit crony capitalism/regulatory capture and get Big Money out of politics–go ahead and do so. I’m not standing in your way–go for it.

But while you pursue your good governance, populist, Left/ Right /Socialist/ Libertarian, etc. reforms, please understand the system is indivisible: the Deep State, the Imperial Project (hegemony and power projection), the State, finance in all its tenacled control mechanisms (greetings, debt-serfs and student-loan-serfs), crony capitalism /regulatory capture, money buying political influence, media propaganda passing as “news”, and the evisceration of democracy (something untoward could happen if the serfs could overthrow the Power Elite at the ballot box–can’t let that happen)–it’s all one system.

Should any one organ be ripped from the body, the entire body dies. The entire system defends each subsystem as integral as a matter of survival. As a result, the naive notion that big money can be excised with only positive consequences is false: restoring democracy places the entire system at risk of implosion.
 
No more bread and circuses, no more Social Security checks, no more state employee pensions–it all melts into air if any subsystem stops doing its job.

The system is interdependent. Each subsystem needs the others to function. I drew up a chart of the major components (but by no means all) of the system:


The system is a machine in which each gear serves the whole. So go ahead and try to “reform” the system by extracting whatever gear you don’t approve of: the Deep State components, the Security State organs, the Federal Reserve, cartels/monopolies enforced by the State, the suppression of democracy, crony capitalism, whatever.

The machine will resist your “reform” to the death because should you succeed, the machine will implode. Take out the financialization gear and the financial system collapses.

So go ahead and reform to your heart’s content. Go ahead and believe the system is reformable, if it makes you feel better. Vote for Bernie or The Donald or whomever. Go ahead and disagree with me. Prove me wrong. Prove the State really, really, really wants to serve the working/middle class rather than the Empire that it is. Pursue your Left/ Right/ Socialist/ Libertarian fantasies of righting the Imperial Project by ripping the gears out of the very center of the machine.

It doesn’t work that way. We can’t remove the gears we find distasteful. Either the machine grinds on and we get our share of the swag–bread and circuses, corporate welfare, State jobs and pensions, Medicaid and Medicare, and all the rest of the immense swag of hegemony and the Imperial Project–or the system implodes and all the swag melts into air.

The great irony is what’s unsustainable melts into thin air no matter how many people want it to keep going.

But go ahead and disagree. It’s your right, by golly. Go ahead and try to “reform” the system and see how far you get.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/10/you-cant-separate-empire-the-state-financialization-and-crony-capitalism-its-one-indivisible-system.html

Hillary Clinton: Libya’s plan to create a gold-backed currency got Gaddafi murdered


HILLARY EMAILS REVEAL TRUE MOTIVE FOR LIBYA INTERVENTION 


Newly disclosed emails show that Libya’s plan to create a gold-backed currency to compete with the euro and dollar was a motive for NATO’s intervention

 
January 6, 2016 


The New Year’s Eve release of over 3,000 new Hillary Clinton emails from the State Department has CNN abuzz over gossipy text messages, the “who gets to ride with Hillary” selection process set up by her staff, and how a “cute” Hillary photo fared on Facebook.

But historians of the 2011 NATO war in Libya will be sure to notice a few of the truly explosive confirmations contained in the new emails

- admissions of rebel war crimes, 
- special ops trainers inside Libya from nearly the start of protests, 
- Al Qaeda embedded in the U.S. backed opposition, 
- Western nations jockeying for access to Libyan oil, 
- the nefarious origins of the absurd Viagra mass rape claim, and 
- concern over Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves threatening European currency.

Hillary’s Death Squads

 

A March 27, 2011, intelligence brief on Libya, sent by long time close adviser to the Clintons and Hillary’s unofficial intelligence gatherer, Sidney Blumenthal, contains clear evidence of war crimes on the  part of NATO-backed rebels. Citing a rebel commander source “speaking in strict confidence” Blumenthal reports to Hillary [emphasis mine]:

Under attack from allied Air and Naval forces, the Libyan Army troops have begun to desert to the rebel side in increasing numbers. The rebels are making an effort to greet these troops as fellow Libyans, in an effort to encourage additional defections.

(Source Comment: Speaking in strict confidence, one rebel commander stated that his troops continue to summarily execute all foreign mercenaries captured in the fighting…).

While the illegality of extra-judicial killings is easy to recognize (groups engaged in such are conventionally termed “death squads”), the sinister reality behind the “foreign mercenaries” reference might not be as immediately evident to most.

While over the decades Gaddafi was known to make use of European and other international security and infrastructural contractors, there is no evidence to suggest that these were targeted by the Libyan rebels.

There is, however, ample documentation by journalists, academics, and human rights groups demonstrating that black Libyan civilians and sub-Saharan contract workers, a population favored by Gaddafi in his pro-African Union policies, were targets of “racial cleansing” by rebels who saw black Libyans as tied closely with the regime.[1]

Black Libyans were commonly branded as “foreign mercenaries” by the rebel opposition for their perceived general loyalty to Gaddafi as a community and subjected to torture, executions, and their towns “liberated” by ethnic cleansing. This is demonstrated in the most well-documented example of Tawergha, an entire town of 30,000 black and “dark-skinned” Libyans which vanished by August 2011 after its takeover by NATO-backed NTC Misratan brigades.

These attacks were well-known as late as 2012 and often filmed, as this report from The Telegraph confirms:

After Muammar Gaddafi was killed, hundreds of migrant workers from neighboring states were imprisoned by fighters allied to the new interim authorities. They accuse the black Africans of having been mercenaries for the late ruler. Thousands of sub-Saharan Africans have been rounded up since Gaddafi fell in August.

It appears that Clinton was getting personally briefed on the battlefield crimes of her beloved anti-Gaddafi fighters long before some of the worst of these genocidal crimes took place.

Al-Qaeda and Western Special Forces Inside Libya

 

The same intelligence email from Sydney Blumenthal also confirms what has become a well-known theme of Western supported insurgencies in the Middle East: the contradiction of special forces training militias that are simultaneously suspected of links to Al Qaeda.

Blumenthal relates that “an extremely sensitive source” confirmed that British, French, and Egyptian special operations units were training Libyan militants along the Egyptian-Libyan border, as well as in Benghazi suburbs.

While analysts have long speculated as to the “when and where” of Western ground troop presence in the Libyan War, this email serves as definitive proof that special forces were on the ground only within a month of the earliest protests which broke out in the middle to end of February 2011 in Benghazi.

By March 27 of what was commonly assumed a simple “popular uprising” external special operatives were already “overseeing the transfer of weapons and supplies to the rebels” including “a seemingly endless supply of AK47 assault rifles and ammunition.”

Yet only a few paragraphs after this admission, caution is voiced about the very militias these Western special forces were training because of concern that, “radical/terrorist groups such as the Libyan Fighting Groups and Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) are infiltrating the NLC and its military command.”

The Threat of Libya’s Oil and Gold to French Interests

 

Though the French-proposed U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973 claimed the no-fly zone implemented over Libya was to protect civilians, an April 2011 email sent to Hillary with the subject line “France’s client and Qaddafi’s gold” tells of less noble ambitions.

The email identifies French President Nicholas Sarkozy as leading the attack on Libya with five specific purposes in mind: to obtain Libyan oil, ensure French influence in the region, increase Sarkozy’s reputation domestically, assert French military power, and to prevent Gaddafi’s influence in what is considered “Francophone Africa.”

Most astounding is the lengthy section delineating the huge threat that Gaddafi’s gold and silver reserves, estimated at “143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver,” posed to the French franc (CFA) circulating as a prime African currency. In place of the noble sounding “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P) doctrine fed to the public, there is this “confidential” explanation of what was really driving the war [emphasis mine]:

This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French franc (CFA).

(Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued at more than $7 billion. French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the factors that influenced President Nicolas Sarkozy’s decision to commit France to the attack on Libya.)

Though this internal email aims to summarize the motivating factors driving France’s (and by implication NATO’s) intervention in Libya, it is interesting to note that saving civilian lives is conspicuously absent from the briefing.

Instead, the great fear reported is that Libya might lead North Africa into a high degree of economic independence with a new pan-African currency.

French intelligence “discovered” a Libyan initiative to freely compete with European currency through a local alternative, and this had to be subverted through military aggression.

The Ease of Floating Crude Propaganda

 

Early in the Libyan conflict Secretary of State Clinton formally accused Gaddafi and his army of using mass rape as a tool of war. Though numerous international organizations, like Amnesty International, quickly debunked these claims, the charges were uncritically echoed by Western politicians and major media.  It seemed no matter how bizarre the conspiracy theory, as long as it painted Gaddafi and his supporters as monsters, and so long as it served the cause of prolonged military action in Libya, it was deemed credible by network news.

Two foremost examples are referenced in the latest batch of emails: the sensational claim that Gaddafi issued Viagra to his troops for mass rape, and the claim that bodies were “staged” by the Libyan government at NATO bombing sites to give the appearance of the Western coalition bombing civilians.

In a late March 2011 email, Blumenthal confesses to Hillary that,

I communicated more than a week ago on this story—Qaddafi placing bodies to create PR stunts about supposed civilian casualties as a result of Allied bombing—though underlining it was a rumor. But now, as you know, Robert Gates gives credence to it. (See story below.)

Sources now say, again rumor (that is, this information comes from the rebel side and is unconfirmed independently by Western intelligence), that Qaddafi has adopted a rape policy and has even distributed Viagra to troops. The incident at the Tripoli press conference involving a woman claiming to be raped is likely to be part of a much larger outrage. Will seek further confirmation.

Not only did Defense Secretary Robert Gates promote his bizarre “staged bodies” theory on CBS News’ “Face The Nation,” but the even stranger Viagra rape fiction made international headlines as U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice made a formal charge against Libya in front of the UN Security Council.

What this new email confirms is that not only was the State Department aware of the spurious nature of what Blumenthal calls “rumors” originating solely with the rebels, but did nothing to stop false information from rising to top officials who then gave them “credence." It appears, furthermore, that the Viagra mass rape hoax likely originated with Sidney Blumenthal himself.

Note:  [1] The most comprehensive and well-documented study of the plight of black Libyans is contained in Slouching Towards Sirte: NATO’s War on Libya and Africa (publ. 2012, Baraka Books) by Maximilian Forte, Professor Anthropology and Sociology at Concordia University in Montréal, Québec.


Would you believe? Obama's New “Miracle Bombs” That Don’t Kill !!!!


World Rushes To Obama’s Door For New “Miracle Bombs” That Don’t Kill Anyone  ??!!


In what we can only surmise may be a “tongue-in-cheek” report issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) today, Russian diplomats are lauding Nobel Prize winning United States President Barack Obama for his development of what can only be described as a “miracle bomb” after the US State Department issued its year end report stating that these feared weapons of war were dropped by American aircraft 23,144 times in 2015 on the nations of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, and not only failed to stop the terrorist gains in these Islamic nations, but amazingly only killed 6 innocent civilians!



According to this report, the Western world may, indeed, be rushing to Obama’s door to obtain for themselves these new “miracle bombs” that don’t kill anyone to distinguish themselves too, like the Americans, in their war fighting prowess—particularly against the barbaric Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL/Daesh) terrorists operating in the Levant War Zone that will allow these nations to claim that they are doing something when, in fact, they don’t have to do anything at all.

Being left out and not being allowed to either use or purchase Obama’s “miracle bombs”, this report continues, are Federation Aerospace Forces who are being left with only “old fashioned bombs” to use in their fight against these barbaric terrorists—and which in the past 10 days alone, 1,097 Islamic State terrorist targets in Syria have been struck, thereby allowing Syrian Democratic Forces to continue their advance on the Islamic State’s capitol, Raqqa, and has allowed these forces to gain control over al-Salhiya, Rdzheman-Alaia, el-Qria and Hadriyat-Ayn-Isa, too.


As to what Obama has done with America’s “old fashioned bombs,” now that he is now using their new “miracle” version, this report notes, is to give some of the worst of them to his Sunni Muslim ally Saudi Arabia that has begun using them against the Shiite Muslim civilian population of Yemen—which, most unfortunately, United Nation Secretary General Ban Ki-moon this past Friday (8 January) called agrave war crime”.


Equally as spectacular as Obama’s new “miracle bomb” is, this report continues, his power to continue using it has now become virtually unlimited as the top US Senator in America, Mitch McConnell, yesterday stated that the US Congress would not authorize any war against Islamic State terrorists thus leaving President Obama to bomb whomever and wherever he wants to.

(HOW is it that this tyranny continues to be allowed and even promoted by the U.S.A. criminal cabal mafia CON-gress? and UN-justice department? while the entire world looks at you and me as though we are supporting this unlawful insane activity?  WE - you and me - and all of America are being blamed for these crimes against humanity worldwide.  WHY do owe CONTINUE to ALLOW this criminal cabal demonic devils travesty to continue?)



Because the Federation is still using “old fashioned bombs” to strike these terrorists though, this report states, the Western nations behind  Obama’s “miracle bomb” have, of course, begun attacking Russia for causing the starvation of children (it’s ALWAYS the children) in Syria for using them—which would be sad if it was true, but, and as explained today by the AntiWar.com website in their article titled Fake Images of Crisis in Syria’s Madaya Making the Rounds, was proved to be a deliberate manufactured lie

A flurry of new stories surrounding mass starvation in the besieged Syrian town of Madaya, once a popular resort destination, have included some shocking images of starving children, and reports of people surviving on grass and tree leaves.

Even the editors here at Antiwar.com were briefly taken in, posting a story from the normally dependable al-Jazeera which used photographic “evidence” which turned out to be recycled photos from previous incidents.

Al-Jazeera’s top image of a starving child in that story, for instance, is the same child from a YouTube video in Derna, Syria, way back in May, months before the Madaya siege even began.

His isn’t the only image falsely attributed to the current crisis, with el-Akhbar identifying many of the other most high-profile pictures as having previous origins, one as far back as a 2009 picture of a refugee arriving in Europe, and a photo of a starving infant “in Madaya” dating from early 2014, and the infant shown is trapped in the ISIS-occupied Palestinian refugee camp or Yarmouk.

The shocking nature of the images makes for great press, and many are trying to parlay that into a chance to condemn the Syrian government, their Russian allies, and Hezbollah. 

While there are crises all over Syria and well-documented suffering that has produced millions of refugees, one would think there would not be a need to manufacture phony stories surrounding recycled pictures. 

For those looking to hype the crisis-du-jour, however, it seems that asking for real photos of the real situation is just too inconvenient, and it’s easier to just re-brand the first starving child you see.”



MoFA analysts contributing to this report note that this isn’t the first time, either, that the Western media has concocted lies about Russia—such as this past December when German state broadcaster ZDF hired unemployed actors to portray Russian soldiers in Ukraine

A German journalist called Dietmar came to see me as well as a film crew from Germany and said ‘let’s film a documentary about you’ saying that you went from Kaliningrad to Donetsk to fight for the separatists,” Lobyskin admitted. 'Dietmar' is ZDF political observer Dietmar Schumann, the Rossiya 1 report states.

“[Dietmar] said to me that they needed me to say that I was wounded, despite the fact that I have never be wounded. Firstly they took me to Moscow and then two hours later I was in Rostov."

Lobyskin was met at the airport by the German channel’s Russian speaking producer Valery Bobkov, who offered Yury 50,000 rubles (some $700 at current rate) to take part in the documentary. He was taken to the Donbass region where the conflict was taking place and instructed what to say.

“[Bobkov] trained me for three or four days. He told me exactly what to say and encouraged me to write things down.”

In order for Obama to keep his “miracle bomb” secret from the American peopl, too, this report points out, his mainstream media “presstitutes” have even begun showing film of Aerospace Forces airstrikes against Islamic State terrorists while stating, falsely, that US planes were the ones doing this:  

PBS NewsHour, a daily US television news program shown on the US Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), used footage of Russian airstrikes against ISIL targets, claiming that they were US airstrikes, an Information Clearing House article revealed.

“For the first time the US is attacking oil delivery trucks," the voice-over said between 2:30 — 2:35, while showing a clip of exactly the same video published by the Russian Defense Ministry the day before.”




As to which nations will benefit from having Obama’s new “miracle bomb” dropped on them in 2016, this report concludes, isn’t at this time known—but will most certainly create extreme joy in the Western world as no more innocent civilians will ever have to die from them again or, if they are, it can just all be blamed on Russia.  



http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1980.htm
Sorcha Faal
Jan 11 2016

The new way police are surveilling you


THE NEW WAY POLICE ARE SURVEILLING YOU - CALCULATING YOUR 'THREAT SCORE' !!!!  WHY AREN'T THEY 'SURVEILLING' THE KNOWN TROUBLE MAKERS - MUSLIMS, DRUG DEALERS - INSTEAD OF AMERICAN FAMILIES, STUDENTS & MOM AND POP BUSINESSES ?




While officers raced to a recent 911 call about a man threatening his ex-girlfriend, a police operator in headquarters consulted software that scored the suspect’s potential for violence the way a bank might run a credit report.

The program scoured billions of data points, including arrest reports, property records, commercial databases, deep Web searches and the man’s social- media postings. It calculated his threat level as the highest of three color-coded scores: a bright red warning.

The man had a firearm conviction and gang associations, so out of caution police called a negotiator. The suspect surrendered, and police said the intelligence helped them make the right call — it turned out he had a gun.

As a national debate has played out over mass surveillance by the National Security Agency, a new generation of technology such as the Beware software being used in Fresno has given local law enforcement officers unprecedented power to peer into the lives of citizens.

Police officials say such tools can provide critical information that can help uncover terrorists or thwart mass shootings, ensure the safety of officers and the public, find suspects, and crack open cases. They say that last year’s attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif., have only underscored the need for such measures.

But the powerful systems also have become flash points for civil libertarians and activists, who say they represent a troubling intrusion on privacy, have been deployed with little public oversight and have potential for abuse or error. Some say laws are needed to protect the public.

In many instances, people have been unaware that the police around them are sweeping up information, and that has spawned controversy. Planes outfitted with cameras filmed protests and unrest in Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo. For years, dozens of departments used devices that can hoover up all cellphone data in an area without search warrants. Authorities in Oregon are facing a federal probe after using social media-monitoring software to keep tabs on Black Lives Matter hashtags.

“This is something that’s been building since September 11,” said Jennifer Lynch, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “First funding went to the military to develop this technology, and now it has come back to domestic law enforcement. It’s the perfect storm of cheaper and easier-to-use technologies and money from state and federal governments to purchase it.

Few departments will discuss how — or sometimes if — they are using these tools, but the Fresno police offered a rare glimpse inside a cutting-edge $600,000 nerve center, even as a debate raged in the city over its technology.

An arsenal of high-tech tools
 
Fresno’s Real Time Crime Center is the type of facility that has become the model for high-tech policing nationwide. Similar centers have opened in New York, Houston and Seattle over the past decade.

Fresno’s futuristic control room, which operates around the clock, sits deep in its headquarters and brings together a handful of technologies that allow the department to see, analyze and respond to incidents as they unfold across this city of more than 500,000 in the San Joaquin Valley.

On a recent Monday afternoon, the center was a hive of activity. The police radio crackled over loudspeakers — “subject armed with steel rod” — as five operators sat behind banks of screens dialing up a wealth of information to help units respond to the more than 1,200 911 calls the department receives every day.

On 57 monitors that cover the walls of the center, operators zoomed and panned an array of roughly 200 police cameras perched across the city. They could dial up 800 more feeds from the city’s schools and traffic cameras, and they soon hope to add 400 more streams from cameras worn on officers’ bodies and from thousands from local businesses that have surveillance systems.

The cameras were only one tool at the ready. Officers could trawl a private database that has recorded more than 2 billion scans of vehicle licenses plates and locations nationwide. If gunshots were fired, a system called ShotSpotter could triangulate the location using microphones strung around the city. Another program, called Media Sonar, crawled social media looking for illicit activity. Police used it to monitor individuals, threats to schools and hashtags related to gangs.

Fresno police said having the ability to access all that information in real time is crucial to solving crimes.

They recently used the cameras to track a robbery suspect as he fled a business and then jumped into a canal to hide. He was quickly apprehended.

The license plate database was instrumental in solving a September murder case in which police had a description of a suspect’s vehicle and three numbers from the license plate.

But perhaps the most controversial and revealing technology is the threat-scoring software Beware. Fresno is one of the first departments in the nation to test the program.

As officers respond to calls, Beware automatically runs the address. The searches return the names of residents and scans them against a range of publicly available data to generate a color-coded threat level for each person or address: green, yellow or red.

Exactly how Beware calculates threat scores is something that its maker, Intrado, considers a trade secret, so it is unclear how much weight is given to a misdemeanor, felony or threatening comment on Facebook. However, the program flags issues and provides a report to the user.

In promotional materials, Intrado writes that Beware could reveal that the resident of a particular address was a war veteran suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, had criminal convictions for assault and had posted worrisome messages about his battle experiences on social media. The “big data” that has transformed marketing and other industries has now come to law enforcement.

Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer said officers are often working on scant or even inaccurate information when they respond to calls, so Beware and the Real Time Crime Center give them a sense of what may be behind the next door.

“Our officers are expected to know the unknown and see the unseen,” Dyer said. “They are making split-second decisions based on limited facts. The more you can provide in terms of intelligence and video, the more safely you can respond to calls.”

But some in Fresno say the power and the sheer concentration of surveillance in the Real Time Crime Center is troubling. The concerns have been raised elsewhere as well — last year, Oakland city officials scaled back plans for such a center after residents protested, citing privacy concerns.

Rob Nabarro, a Fresno civil rights lawyer, said he is particularly concerned about Beware. He said outsourcing decisions about the threat posed by an individual to software is a problem waiting to happen.
Nabarro said the fact that only Intrado — not the police or the public — knows how Beware tallies its scores is disconcerting. He also worries that the system might mistakenly increase someone’s threat level by misinterpreting innocuous activity on social media, like criticizing the police, and trigger a heavier response by officers.

“It’s a very unrefined, gross technique,” Nabarro said of Beware’s color-coded levels. “A police call is something that can be very dangerous for a citizen.”

Dyer said such concerns are overblown, saying the scores don’t trigger a particular police response. He said operators use them as guides to delve more deeply into someone’s background, looking for information that might be relevant to an officer on scene. He said officers on the street never see the scores.

Still, Nabarro is not the only one worried.

The Fresno City Council called a hearing on Beware in November after constituents raised concerns. One council member referred to a local media report saying that a woman’s threat level was elevated because she was tweeting about a card game titled “Rage,” which could be a keyword in Beware’s assessment of social media.

Councilman Clinton J. Olivier, a libertarian-leaning Republican, said Beware was like something out of a dystopian science fiction novel and asked Dyer a simple question: “Could you run my threat level now?”
Dyer agreed. The scan returned Olivier as a green, but his home came back as a yellow, possibly because of someone who previously lived at his address, a police official said.

“Even though it’s not me that’s the yellow guy, your officers are going to treat whoever comes out of that house in his boxer shorts as the yellow guy,” Olivier said. “That may not be fair to me.”

He added later: “[Beware] has failed right here with a council member as the example.”

An Intrado representative responded to an interview request seeking more information about how Beware works by sending a short statement. It read in part: “Beware works to quickly provide [officers] with commercially available, public information that may be relevant to the situation and may give them a greater level of awareness.”

Calls for ‘meaningful debate’
 
Similar debates over police surveillance have been playing out across the country, as new technologies have proliferated and law enforcement use has exploded.

The number of local police departments that employ some type of technological surveillance increased from 20 percent in 1997 to more than 90 percent in 2013, according to the latest information from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. The most common forms of surveillance are cameras and automated license plate readers, but the use of handheld biometric scanners, social media monitoring software, devices that collect cellphone data and drones is increasing.

Locally, the American Civil Liberties Union reports that police in the District, Baltimore, and Montgomery and Fairfax counties have cellphone-data collectors, called cell site simulators or StingRays. D.C. police are also using ShotSpotter and license plate readers.

The surveillance creates vast amounts of data, which is increasingly pooled in local, regional and national databases. The largest such project is the FBI’s $1 billion Next Generation Identification project, which is creating a trove of fingerprints, iris scans, data from facial recognition software and other sources that aid local departments in identifying suspects.  (The FBI is a private for profit business and is NOT a true 'government' authorized agency, same as the CIA, TSA, DEA, IRS, BLM, CDC, et al. From what and where do these private corporations obtain legal authority to surveil and pursue a private individual in this nation?)

Law enforcement officials say such tools allow them to do more with less, and they have credited the technology with providing breaks in many cases. 

Virginia State Police found the man who killed a TV news crew during a live broadcast last year after his license plate was captured by a reader.

Cell site simulators, which mimic a cellphone tower and scoop up data on all cellphones in an area, have been instrumental in finding kidnappers, fugitives and people who are suicidal, law enforcement officials said.  But those benefits have sometimes come with a cost to privacy. Law enforcement used cell site simulators for years without getting a judge’s explicit consent. But following criticism by the ACLU and other groups, the Justice Department announced last September that it would require all federal agencies to get a search warrant.

The fact that public discussion of surveillance technologies is occurring after they are in use is backward, said Matt Cagle, an attorney for the ACLU of Northern California.  “We think that whenever these surveillance technologies are on the table, there needs to be a meaningful debate,” Cagle said. “There needs to be safeguards and oversight.

After the contentious hearing before the Fresno City Council on Beware, Dyer said he now wants to make changes to address residents’ concerns. The police chief said he is working with Intrado to turn off Beware’s color-coded rating system and possibly the social media monitoring.

“There’s a balancing act,” Dyer said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/the-new-way-police-are-surveilling-you-calculating-your-threat-score/2016/01/10/e42bccac-8e15-11e5-baf4-bdf37355da0c_story.html          

Monsanto to face tribunal at The Hague for 'ecocide'


Monsanto to face tribunal at The Hague for 'ecocide' against humanity and the planet





(NaturalNews) An international tribunal made up of some of the world's leading environmental and human rights groups, is set to hold the world's most evil corporation, Monsanto, accountable for its crimes against nature and humanity.

Dubbed "The Monsanto Tribunal," a cohort of scientists, environmentalists and professionals from all across the globe will put Monsanto on trial at an upcoming hearing at The Hague this fall, where the purveyor of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and chemical crop herbicides will be charged for committing "ecocide."

The goal of the hearing will be to lay out all the evidence against Monsanto, and come up with a concrete plan to hold the multinational corporation responsible for injuring human life and destroying the planet. The event will take place from October 12–16, 2016, with an official trial to be concluded on World Food Day.

"Recognizing ecocide as a crime is the only way to guarantee the right of humans to a healthy environment and the right of nature to be protected," reads the mission statement on The International Monsanto Tribunal's website.

Utilizing international guidelines for handling cross-border criminal activity, the Tribunal will assess the full extent of Monsanto's improprieties and form a solid game plan for prosecuting the chemical giant in international courts.

"The Tribunal will rely on the 'Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights' adopted at the UN in 2011," the statement adds.

"It will also assess potential criminal liability on the basis of the Rome Statu[t]e that created the International Criminal Court in The Hague in 2002, and it will consider whether a reform of international criminal law is warranted to include crimes against the environment, or ecocide, as a prosecutable criminal offense, so that natural persons could incur criminal liability."
 

Monsanto's very existence was built on deception, manipulation and lies

Endorsed by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), IFOAM International Organics, Navdanya, Regeneration International (RI) and Millions Against Monsanto, the Tribunal represents one of the first attempts at the international level to bring Monsanto to bear for its criminal activity.

Besides those injured or killed by Monsanto's actions, the flood of GMOs and crop chemicals into food supplies throughout the world has led to severe planetary changes, not the least of which is climate change resulting from chemically-induced disruptions to the natural carbon cycle.

"The time is long overdue for a global citizens' tribunal to put Monsanto on trial for crimes against humanity and the environment," says OCA head Ronnie Cummins.

"We are in Paris this month to address the most serious threat that humans have ever faced in our 100-200,000 year evolution—global warming and climate disruption."

Many people still falsely believe that Monsanto got to where it is today through honest scientific innovation and sound agricultural solutions that have helped both farmers and consumers achieve better food security. But this is hardly the case.

Monsanto and other key biotechnology players illicitly manufactured their own success by manipulating regulators, falsifying research and bullying politicians and health policy leaders into bringing GMOs and crop chemicals to the market without any evidence of safety or necessity.

Andre Leu, president of IFOAM and member of the RI Steering Committee, told the press that Monsanto's entire existence has been predicated on its effectiveness in "lobbying regulatory agencies and governments ... resorting to lying and corruption ... financing fraudulent scientific studies ... pressuring independent scientists ... [and] manipulating the press and media."

"Monsanto's history reads like a text-book case of impunity, benefiting transnational corporations and their executives, whose activities contribute to climate and biosphere crises and threaten the safety of the planet," Leu added.

To learn more about the Monsanto Tribunal, visit: Monsanto-Tribunal.org


Sources for this article include:

BlacklistedNews.com

Monsanto-Tribunal.org


http://www.naturalnews.com/052588_Monsanto_crimes_against_humanity_The_Hague.html#

Monday, January 11, 2016

The State of the Union Tuesday night Jan 12th

  
THE STATE OF THE UNION WILL BE SNAPCHATTED, LIVE-STREAMED, TWEETED AND, OH YEAH, BROADCAST


Alyssa Bereznak
National Correspondent, Technology
January 10, 2016


On Tuesday night, Obama will deliver his sixth and final State of the Union address and as details trickle out about what it will include, it’s clear that the administration is focused equally on both the message and the medium.

This, according to a Sunday evening Medium post by the White House’s chief digital officer and Twitter veteran Jason Goldman: “The American people will see a multi-platform streaming and social broadcast of the State of the Union that reflects the ways people experience live events in 2016,” he wrote. “We’ll be reaching people where they are — and making it possible for them to engage, respond, and share the president’s speech themselves in new and different ways.”

Specifically, the White House’s media team has partnered with Amazon to stream the address via its video platform as a way to reach “those who’ve cut the cord from cable and network TV” and now use smart TVs, laptops, mobile devices and tablets to watch shows. 

Per usual, the White House will also offer a live stream of the event on its YouTube channel and the White House website, and hold Twitter Q&As with top officials the following day. 

Meanwhile, the White House has premiered a project that features contextual notes from Obama and his former staffers on past State of the Union speeches via the online annotation platform Genius. 

On Monday morning, the White House also announced it joined Snapchat to offer a behind-the-scenes view of the preparation leading up to the speech.


As Goldman notes, the effort to bring a multi-platform experience has emerged from a long history of broadcast mediums through which the State of the Union has been delivered. 

The very first TV broadcast of the annual speech was by Harry Truman in 1947, the first live webcast was delivered by George W. Bush in 2002, and Barack Obama was the first to introduce an enhanced live stream of the speech — which included text, graphs and images, alongside footage — in 2011.

And just so they’ll have at least one guest who fully appreciates all these efforts, 'Michelle' Obama will be sitting alongside Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella in the audience. 

How’s that for a tech-savvy administration?

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/the-state-of-the-union-will-be-digitized-234039253.html

BREAKING: "HISTORY MADE" Idaho 3% Rolls Up on FBI Compound


IDAHO, THE FBI AND MORE WITH PETE SANTILLI...HISTORIC EVENT..

Breaking: “History Made” Idaho 3% Rolls Up on the FBI Compound

Sunday, January 10, 2016 16:16
 
 
 On January 9, 2016, the FBI was surprised to see a convoy of approximately 20 vehicles roll into the same compound. Who were these new people, and why were they there? Turns out they were the Idaho 3% militiamen, our patriots. While the FBI seemed to be caught off guard, not knowing what to think at first, tensions soon turned into understanding and dialog. Tensions were obviously high, but both the militia and the FBI handled themselves in a professional manner, ending with handshakes and smiles.
 
 Historic Militia Moment! 
Heavily Armed Idaho 3 Percenters 
Roll Up On FBI Compound - Burns Oregon
 
 
The Idaho 3% have made it clear they are there to ensure peace on both sides.  They will not allow aggression from the federal government, law enforcement, nor from the patriots occupying the refuge. Their mission is to help open dialog and keep the peace between the patriot protesters, local law enforcement, and the FBI while the controversy of the land dispute is ongoing. 

During this meeting, the FBI was spoken to about the grievances of the townspeople wanting the FBI to leave their town as well as asked to open an investigation into the Hammond case. The FBI listened to the grievances and stated they would deliver them up their chain of command.  

Brandon Curtiss of Idaho 3% was interviewed by Mr. Santilli after this successful mission was accomplished. Mr. Curtiss exposes they have new evidence the BLM and not lightning started the fires which the Hammonds put out by starting a backburn. Yes, this is the same backburn the Hammonds are currently in federal prison over. Should that be found true, there is no doubt the unlawful terrorist BLM agency will be feeling the flames of justice burning and searing through to their very core.
 
An Interview
Streamed live on Jan 9, 2016
Brandon Curtiss
www.iiipercentidaho.org

 


This compound will go down in history as the first time the militia have rolled into an FBI compound requesting open dialog, transparency, and making it clear they are there to enforce peace on both sides. No violence to be tolerated. 
 
This is the ”Shot Heard Around the World,” without a bullet being fired. As MSM slept through one of the most historical days in the history of our union, we the people remain diligent in the fight to restore our republic.

I am thankful to all the patriots that are standing up for what is right in the face of government terrorism, oppression, and tyranny. I am also thankful to the individual FBI agents on the scene who appeared to be prepared to listen and allow a dialog to begin between the people and their servants. 

While the FBI stated they do not want any violence, only time will tell if they are sincere or not. It should be duly noted the FBI clearly stated Sheriff Ward was the one who had the authority to make them leave, or continue to have them stay, which is what Ammon Bundy has been saying all along. 

A special thank you to Mr. Santilli and other independent media that have been tirelessly covering the truth and recording history. Without them I have no doubt this historical event would have never been known and history lost. 

As Thomas Jefferson so eloquently stated “our attachment to no nation on earth should supplant our attachment to liberty“[ June 26-July 6, 1775 "Declaration of the Causes and Necessity for Taking Up Arms" ] 
God Bless all those who are in Burns, Oregon. You are in our prayers. 

Burns, Oregon Town Hall Meeting 1/1/16






http://recognition-system.beforeitsnews.com/protests-demonstrations/2016/01/breaking-history-made-idaho-3-rolls-up-on-fbi-compound-2456214.html