ANNETTE FUNICELLO VIDEO REPORT & Comment on why she went public with MS

ANNETTE FUNICELLO VIDEO REPORT & Comment on why she went public with MS

Posted By: Infoeditor [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 9-Apr-2013 04:33:46

In Response To: Annette Funicello Passes at 70. An Original ‘Mouseketeer' Will Be Missed (Infoeditor)

ANNETTE FUNICELLO VIDEO REPORT & Comment on why she went public with MS Leave it to Annette to remain positive, even with Multiple Sclerosis. Largely, the biggest reason Annette went public with her Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis was to help others. She states here she felt her condition was for a reason, to help others. There is no doubt that great inroads have been made into this M.S. illness due to Annette's efforts and many thanks to Annette who must be smiling down upon us now. Some reports say she had also been concerned over the loss of the use of her legs and mobility that some people might wonder if she was drunk, etc., which is a real possibility considering how this happened to the late Rita Hayworth with her Alzheimers illness. Rita had reportedly been ill for quite some time with Alzheimers and not functioning well at all before she was accurately diagnosed. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-207_162-57578455/annette-funicello-mouseketeer-and-film-star-dies-at-70/ Annette Funicello, Mouseketeer and film star, dies at 70 http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-207_162-57578455/annette-funicello-mouseketeer-and-film-star-dies-at-70/ Posted in addition to below article ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ : Annette Funicello Passes at 70. An Original ‘Mouseketeer' Will : Be Missed : It's with a sad countenance I report that Annette Funicello, : one of the first Disney Mouseketeers, died at 70 Monday, : April 8, 2013 after what must be considered a lengthy : struggle with muliple sclerosis which she was reportedly : diagnosed with in 1987. In addition to acting, Annette had : a singing career, also. Some of her albums are listed : below. (1) : Her film career included starring in beach movies like 'Beach : Party', 'Beach Blanket Bingo', and others with Frankie : Avalon and became something of a cult star as well as a : good entertainer. Many, many of us grew up watching : 'Frankie and Annette' films, etc.. : I can't help believing that chemtrails may have worsened or : caused Annette's illness. Like Lee Remick and others who : drank California water and breathed chemtrail air, I think : it contributed to their premature deaths. : Seems like lots of kindred spirits are being 'called home'. : Thanks to Annette for so many wonderful thrills. RIP : Annette Funicello. : 1. Annette Funicello : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annette_Funicello : Albums : Mono albums : Annette – Vista BV-3301 (1959) : Annette Sings Anka (#21) – Vista BV-3302 (1960) : Hawaiiannette (#38) – Vista BV-3303 (1960) : Italiannette – Vista BV-3304 (1960) : Dance Annette – Vista BV-3305 (1961) : The Story of My Teens – Vista BV-3312 (1962) : Stereo albums : Annette's Beach Party (#39) – Vista BV-3316 (Mono)/STER-3316 : (Stereo) (July 1963) : Muscle Beach Party – Vista BV-3314/STER-3314 (April 1964) : Annette On Campus – Vista BV-3320/STER-3320 (1964) : Annette At Bikini Beach – Vista BV-3324/STER-3324 – (September : 1964) : Pajama Party – Vista BV-3325/STER-3325 (November 1964) : Something Borrowed Something Blue – Vista BV-3328/STER-3328 : (1964) : Annette Sings Golden Surfin' Hits – Vista BV-3327/STER-3327 : (July 1965) : Italiannette – Vista BV-3304 (1960) : Dance Annette – Vista BV-3305 (1961) : The Story of My Teens – Vista BV-3312 (1962) : Stereo albums : Annette's Beach Party (#39) – Vista BV-3316 (Mono)/STER-3316 : (Stereo) (July 1963) : Muscle Beach Party – Vista BV-3314/STER-3314 (April 1964) : Annette On Campus – Vista BV-3320/STER-3320 (1964) : Annette At Bikini Beach – Vista BV-3324/STER-3324 – (September : 1964) : Pajama Party – Vista BV-3325/STER-3325 (November 1964) : Something Borrowed Something Blue – Vista BV-3328/STER-3328 : (1964) : Annette Sings Golden Surfin' Hits – Vista BV-3327/STER-3327 : (July 1965) : Annette Funicello – Vista BV-4037 (1972) : Annette Funicello Country Album – Starview 4001 (1984) : Best of Annette – Rhino RNDF-206 (1984) (also released as a : picture disk on Rhino RNLP-702) : Annette: A Musical Reunion with America's Girl-Next-Door – : Vista 60010 (1993) : A Dream Is a Wish Your Heart Makes – Time/Warner 520564 (April : 16, 1995) : The Best of Annette – Vista (August 14, 1991) : 2. Annette Funicello, Former Mousketeer, Dies at 70 : : http://ktla.com/2013/04/08/mickey-mouse-club-star-annette-funicello-dies-at-70/#axzz2Px0cTceC

1959 - ANNETTE FUNICELLO, "IT'S REALLY LOVE" (Farewell to Annette)

1959 - ANNETTE FUNICELLO, "IT'S REALLY LOVE" (Farewell to Annette)

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 8-Apr-2013 16:08:48

Hi, Folks - It's reported that Annette Funicello, among other things hearthrob of an entire generation, passed away today from complications of Mutliple Sclerosis. She was 70. Per wikipedia: --- On April 8, 2013, D23, Disney's official fan club, reported that Funicello had passed away from complications of multiple sclerosis.[17] Commenting on her passing, Bob Iger, Chairman and CEO of The Walt Disney Company, said, "Annette was and always will be a cherished member of the Disney family, synonymous with the word Mousketeer, and a true Disney Legend. She will forever hold a place in our hearts as one of Walt Disney's brightest stars, delighting an entire generation of baby boomers with her jubilant personality and endless talent. Annette was well known for being as beautiful inside as she was on the outside, and she faced her physical challenges with dignity, bravery and grace. All of us at Disney join with family, friends, and fans around the world in celebrating her extraordinary life." [18] --- Below, from 1959, Annette sings "It's Really Love", a song written by Paul Anka that, reworked, eventually became the opening theme for The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. Thanks to YouTuber ncatt. Farewell, Annette; thanks indeed for all you provided while here. ===== http://youtu.be/OpUVj0gphnQ ===== --hobie http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=273606

About the feds pushing back on Sheriffs, etc., pushing back against "federal" overreach

Sent: 4/8/2013 5:19:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
Subj: About the feds pushing back on Sheriffs, etc., pushing back against "federal" overreach

8 April A.D. 2013

Here's a link to one version of this story.

http://modernsurvivalblog.com/government-gone-wild/federal-framework-being-set-up-to-arrest-sheriffs/

The concept of which to be aware is this. The "feds" are right, and the Sheriffs are wrong.

Why is that?

Because "federal" means "federal".

If we had a "constitution", hence, a governmental system at the national level created by, thus also limited by, such accumulation of thoughts on how an independent people govern themselves, then the vast majority of matters and issues that vex us these days wouldn't exist. Since we do not now have, and have never had a "constitution", it follows that throwing the "constitution" at that which vexes us is a generic waste of time, "money", and energy.

What type of system do we have?

The proper label is "democracy", and since the democratic law-making process has yet to be activated on the national level, since (before) this nation's founding, that which passes as "government" functions "federally".

"Federal" has two generic applications. If we're talking about bodies politic, generically, a "commonwealth", "federal" describes the interactions by and between those "commonwealths". Fundamentally, those are "agreements" made by and between "commonwealths". If we're talking about people within a "commonwealth", "federal" still applies. It's the exact same generic concept, i.e., "agreement". This "federal" system operates "federally", and, for all practical purposes for the appearance of complete obliteration of individual rights, "federal" still means "by agreement".

When it comes to the gun-grab insanity, IF there's a basis for such a pogrom, programme, scam, prelim to dictatorship, THEN it'll be 100% commercial in nature. Why is that? Because "federal" means "federal".

Therefore, since that on which the national system depends for its "authority", for anything (including a significant part of its "book of discipline" (it's penal code)), is this or that "agreement", it follows that a Sheriff's intent to interfere with UNITED STATES's enforcement of those "agreements" is 100% beyond the scope of the authority of any Sheriff, or any STATE official, generally.

In other words, any overreach (via the appearance of rights-violating gun-grab activities) isn't really overreach, at all, given that (1) each individual (who is competent, of age of majority, etc.) has a "right (not) to contract", and (2) as a by-product of the clandestine "agreements" on which this present "federal" system operates, those subjected to a gun-grab have (long since) already agreed to be disarmed.

Since the Supreme Court has already confirmed that the right of self-defense includes the ability to defend one's home with firearms, and everyone and everything in that home, no gun-grab programme is going to leave anyone unable to defend one's home.

It's our exercise of our "right (not) to contract", generically, our "right (not) to agree", that creates that which vexes us, these days. Since, as a people, as a nation, we're not yet thinking in terms of our present reality (which started circa 1965, when the last vestiges of silver were removed from general circulation), we're showing up to a howitzer fight with nothing but a broken butter knife.

Once we, as a people, stop "worshiping" the "constitution", a great idea that was never "admissible evidence of law", and start thinking in terms of our present legal reality, we'll be a lot more efficient with our time, "money", and energy. One of the things that will stop happening, then, for example, is using the "constitution" as a rallying point, concept, platform. Instead, we'll ask ourselves, for example, "Where's the agreement?" To get to the point of asking that question, we've got to go through a rather wicked paradigm shift, involving coming to terms with the reality that we do not now have and have never had a "constitution".

Once we have that perspective in mind, we'll stop thinking that there's anything, at all, in the world that's relevant about any "constitution". To get to that stage of development in our thinking about matters legal, we'll see that all this "circle the wagons around the constitution" activity is laughable, in the eyes of those who, for example, realize that it's perfectly Ok to run the obama-nation as a presidential candidate, for there is no Art. II, hence, no procedural limit or substantive limit on how that particular office is filled.

Since the "bad guys" have long since figured out that we do not now have and have never had a "constitution", it's the first (and only) place to start for the "good guys", as well. To understand that we're dealing with "agreements" is to understand that the problem doesn't really start in Washington, anyway. It starts with the person we find in the mirror.

How do we curb the abuses coming out of Washington? We stop exercising our "right to agree" and start exercising our "right not to agree". This is not a political statement. Taking 'Speaker's Corner' and declaring before God [YAHUWAH] and all witnesses assembled is 100% irrelevant. What we're talking about is commercial behavior.

Where's the gun-grab gotcha agreement? There may be several. One may be in the context of war veterans obtaining medical treatment/benefits from the VA. One may be in the content of the "licensing" agreement(s) with the ATF. If there's one that's broader in scope, surely it'll be found in some "income tax" legislation or other.

Key to the solution, then, is starting with a correct identification of the problem. Down that path, "federal" means "federal".

For this reason, the ("constitutional") Sheriffs are staring in the face of "obstruction" charges by interfering with "anything" regarding that the "feds" have an "agreement".

THEREFORE, instead of saying, "The 'constitution' doesn't allow you (feds) to do that", far, far better is learning the "law" well enough to know what, if any, basis for agreement may exist, and then for those Sheriffs to say, to their constituents, "Here are the 'agreements' that the ATF intends to enforce". Do what you can to complete them and terminate them. Then, there can't be a (legitimate) gun grab.

Once there's not a legitimate gun grab, there's nothing but war, and for that, the Sheriffs will be on the front line, of course. However, for so long as there's a legitimate "agreement" for the feds to enforce, the thing that the target of such enforcement will want to do is surrender the offending weapons.

Those who are sick and tired of this present "federal" system, will do well to find ways to stop using the "federal" "funny money".

Thus, if the Sheriffs really want to do something constructive, what they'll do is teach the reality of the "choice of law" problems that accompany the use of "funny money". Then, they'll set up "funny money free zones". Where there genuinely and truly is no commercial activity, of any type (including "taxes", including "income taxes"), using "funny money" within the scope of that Sheriff's jurisdiction, THEN the Sheriffs have the best reason under the heavens to stop the feds at the county line!

However, for so long as "funny money" runs rampantly throughout that Sheriff's jurisdiction (including the medium of exchange by which that particular public servant gets paid), the feds are going to have all the authority they need to enforce whatever it is that they're enforcing (presuming there's also an enforceable "gotcha agreement" formed with the "choice of law" that the "funny money" always brings with it).

The reality is a difficult concept to the hard-core "constitution-ists", as this author was prior to The Terre Haute Litigation. If we really have choices, then we can learn our present reality, so as to learn how to defend ourselves (which involves changing the commercial FACTS (which FACTS are 100% within our control) on which the tyrannical system depends) or we can continue to do the same thing, the same way, while expecting different results. One of these is competent and prudent (and sane); the other, a total waste of time, "money", and energy (and clinically insane). One of these provides solutions; the other, a (much) wider and deeper hole out of which to try to climb.

Since the feds are throwing "agreements", not power, not authority, not tyranny, but "agreements", at us, the way to "push back" is to stop agreeing to being regulated by them.

"Federal" means "federal". This "federal" system operates "federally", i.e., "by agreement". That's how all levels work, not just the national level but also the STATEs, and the counties, and the municipalities. This nation stands a chance of surviving, if those interested in doing something, start thinking in terms of commerce, in terms of Monte Hall's "Let's Make A Deal!" It's not about "law", in the traditional sense. It's about commerce. Is there a "gotcha agreement" to be enforced? If so, those who don't appreciate the (rest of the) consequences of such "agreements" need to stop agreeing to being regulated by them.

In the exact same way that the obama-nation, or any other office holder, STATE or national, cannot compel anyone into any "gotcha agreement", no Sheriff, by being Sheriff, can get anyone out of such agreement, once it's entered into.

Those Sheriffs that find a way to get all "funny money" out of their counties, are the Sheriffs that are serious about putting an end to the insanity of "gun grab", in particular, and to the insanity of what comes out of Washington, generally. Those who continue to allow "funny money" to flourish in their counties, are the last ones on the face of the planet in a position to tell the feds what the feds can or can't do.

To "push back", then, we've got to "walk away", which is 100% commercial activity.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Subscribe / unsubscribe : legal_reality@earthlink.net

World's Most Expensive Places For A Cheap Date----

World's Most Expensive Places For A Cheap Date----

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Monday, 8-Apr-2013 13:25:19

As part of its semi-annual update on "mapping the world's prices", Deutsche Bank has released the following index which we believe may be of interest to some of our more cash-strapped readers. Using a price parity calculation, DB has created the "cheap date" index which consists of i) a standard bouquet of roses, ii) cab rides, iii) pizza, iv) a soft drink, v) two movies tickets and vi) a couple of beers. What the "hit rate" of said basket of products in achieving the desired goal is unclear, but what is clear is that while the disparity between the most expensive (Sydney, Australia) and least expensive (Mumbai, India) place for a cheap date is vast at over 250%, and even a cheap date in Mumbai will set one back some $88.30 (and rising... the price that is). For the interesting charts, click: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-04-08/most-expensive-places-world-cheap-date

Picture in Memory of Annette

Picture in Memory of Annette

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 9-Apr-2013 00:32:54

In Response To: 1959 - ANNETTE FUNICELLO, "IT'S REALLY LOVE" (Farewell to Annette) (hobie)

(Thanks, D. :) Reader David sends us this picture, found here: http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/536926_4063472883754_1340252104_n.jpg =====

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=273629

Thomas Jefferson said......

Every day is a good day, the only thing that can change my day is my attitude.
May your cup overflow so you can share it with others.
Be Blessed
Jim Miller

"To get something you never had, you have to do something you never did." When God takes something from your grasp, He's not punishing you, but merely opening your hands to receive something better.
"The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you."

Thomas Jefferson This is amazing.  There are two parts.  Be sure to read the 2nd part (in RED). Thomas Jefferson was a very remarkable man who started learning very early in life and never stopped.     � At 5, began studying under his cousin's tutor.     � At 9, studied Latin, Greek and French.     � At 14, studied classical literature and additional languages.     � At 16, entered the College of William and Mary.     � At 19, studied Law for 5 years starting under George Wythe.     � At 23, started his own law practice.     � At 25, was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses.     � At 31, wrote the widely circulated "Summary View of the Rights of British America " and retired from his law practice.     � At 32, was a Delegate to the Second Continental Congress.     � At 33, wrote the Declaration of Independence .     � At 33, took three years to revise Virginia ’s legal code and wrote a Public Education bill and a statute for Religious Freedom.     � At 36, was elected the second Governor of Virginia succeeding Patrick Henry.     � At 40, served in Congress for two years.     � At 41, was the American minister to France and negotiated commercial treaties with European nations along with Ben Franklin and John Adams.     � At 46, served as the first Secretary of State under George Washington.     � At 53, served as Vice President and was elected president of the American Philosophical Society.     � At 55, drafted the Kentucky Resolutions and became the active head of Republican Party.     � At 57, was elected the third president of the United States .     � At 60, obtained the Louisiana Purchase doubling the nation’s size.     � At 61, was elected to a second term as President.     � At 65, retired to Monticello .     � At 80, helped President Monroe shape the Monroe Doctrine.     � At 81, almost single-handedly created the University of Virginia and served as its first president.     � At 83, died on the 50th anniversary of the Signing of the Declaration of Independence along with John Adams     Thomas Jefferson knew because he himself studied the previous failed attempts at government.  He understood actual history, the nature of God, his laws and the nature of man.  That happens to be way more than what most understand today.  Jefferson really knew his stuff.  A voice from the past to lead us in the future:     John F. Kennedy held a dinner in the white House for a group of the brightest minds in the nation at that time. He made this statement: "This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence ever to gather at one time in the White House with the exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone."     “When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe .”  -- Thomas Jefferson     “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”    -- Thomas Jefferson    “It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes.  A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.”     -- Thomas Jefferson     “I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”  -- Thomas Jefferson     “My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”  -- Thomas Jefferson     “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”  -- Thomas Jefferson     “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”     -- Thomas Jefferson     “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”  -- Thomas Jefferson     “To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”     -- Thomas Jefferson    Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:    “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.  If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”     I wish we could get this out to everyone!!!     I'm doing my part.  Please do yours......

April 17 Trial To Determine Fate Of America

DISCERNMENT ADVISED

April 9, 2013

April 17 Trial To Determine Fate Of America

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A startling report prepared by the Ministry of Justice (MOJ) is today warning that the case known as United States v. Kebodeaux, and due to be heard by the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) on 17 April, will be the most important ruling in all of American history as should it be lost, the Obama regime, and all of those to follow, will have gained total power to rule the lives of US citizens “from cradle to grave”.

Important to understand, this report says, is that under the United States Constitution, the “general power of governing,” commonly known as the “police power,” belongs to the 50 individual American States— not to their Federal Government.

Because the US Congress has limited powers granted in the Constitution, the Federal government does not have a general police power, as the States do. The exceptions are laws regarding Federal property and the military; the Federal government was also granted broad police powers by the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887.

The main effect of this “balance of power” between the States and the Federal government, this report continues, are the different laws seen among the many States, the most contentious of them being abortion, health care, gun rights and homosexual marriage.

Not being understood by the majority of Americans, this report says, are that States are “free and able” to ignore Federal laws almost at will, but fail to do so because of the Federal governments “carrot and stick” relationship with them. For example, this report cites the mandatory seat belt laws adopted by the States after their being enticed to enact them by the Federal government offering tens of millions of dollars in funding bribes, but should they have failed to make them law they would have lost billions in matching highway funds. 

So dependant upon Federal government “bribes to enact laws” have the States become over the past century, MOJ experts say in this report, the percentage of State budgets dependant upon these monies range from the lowest of North Dakota’s 25.99% to Mississippi being the highest at 49.01%, with the average being nearly 40%.

An adverse ruling in United States v. Kebodeaux, however, this report says, would forever change the current relationship between the States and Federal government giving to the latter the police power they have so long coveted, yet been denied by the US Constitution.

The case being pushed by the Obama regime to enable the Federal government to gain police power over the States has at its center a 34-year old Texas man named Anthony Kebodeaux.

In March 1999, Kebodeaux was a 20-year-old airman stationed at Peterson Air Force Base, in Colorado when he began a consensual sexual relationship with a 15- year-old girl, who would sneak out of her home at night and take a cab to the base to be with him. This relationshiederal law recently enacted, and 7 yearscarnal knowledge” of a “female under the age of 16,” in violation of Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and that he disobeyed orders to have no contact with the girl and to remain on base.

In special court-martial proceedings, Kebodeaux pleaded guilty to the charges and the tribunal sentenced him to three months confinement and a bad-conduct discharge on 17 May 1999. Kebodeaux served his sentence in the Air Force Corrections System, was unconditionally released from custody, and returned to his home in Texas sometime before 18 September 1999.

Between the years 1999-2006 Kebodeaux lived trouble free in Texas until he failed to register as a “sex offender” during a short move and a time of great personal upheaval in his life.  The State of Texas had no interest in prosecuting him, but the same could not be said of the Bush regime.

Arrested by Federal police, not the State of Texas, in 2006, Kebodeaux was charged under a Federal law recently enacted, and 7 years after he had beenunconditionally released. Though he was tried and convicted by a Federal jury, and served 1-year and 1-day in Federal prison, his conviction was overturned upon appeal by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a unanimous decision, who ruled his arrest and prosecution were unconstitutional.

At this point, MOJ experts in this report say, and using past US Federal government precedent, this case, and the issues surrounding it, should have been settled…that is until the Obama regime came to power in 2009.

Seeing in United States v. Kebodeaux a “unique” chance to overturn the US Constitutions application of police power, this report continues, the Obama regime pushed two similar cases through the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit obtaining rulings in conflict with the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, thus insuring it would ultimately be ruled on and decided by the US Supreme Court.

To how frightening this case has become, this report notes, can be see in the Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent filed with the US Supreme Court by the public policy research organization Cato Institute (CATO) which, in part, warns: “Stripped to its essence, the government’s argument would ultimately allow perpetual jurisdiction over anyone merely because they were once subject to federal jurisdiction and are now deemed to be dangerous to the public.”

Critical to note is that United States v. Kebodeaux is the second case the Obama regime has used during the past years in their effort to gain for the Federal government unlimited power, and as we can also read as reported by the American legal scholars at CATO:

“Last year’s partial victory in NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare case) is already being applied to new cases reaching the Supreme Court. Recall that, in that case, the Court accepted our argument that the government cannot use the Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses to compel someone to purchase health insurance. The Court held that allowing Congress to compel commerce into existence would be an improper use of a great and limitless power. In United States v. Kebodeaux, the Supreme Court will once again address an assertion of power that, if upheld, could give Congress nearly limitless power.”

To which Americans are “subject to Federal jurisdiction” is the “key” to this titanic struggle, this report says, and which the Obama regime in United States v. Kebodeaux is, once again like Obamacare, asserting that even those who don’t engage in commerce are still doing so by just doing nothing, because if they wanted to they could.

With the US Pentagon now listing Catholics, evangelical Christians and some Jews in the “religious extremists” category along with the KKK, Hamas and Al Qaeda, this report concludes, and with the Obama regimes “official mouthpiece” MSNBC now telling Americans that their children no longer belong to the parents but, instead,  April 9, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Ed. Note: Western governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagrees with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ against us has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit and which is addressed in the report “Who Is Sorcha Faal?”.]

Margaret Thatcher dies, aged 87 Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has died following a stroke. . . . .

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Margaret Thatcher dies, aged 87 Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has died following a stroke. . . . .

Posted By: Bob [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 8-Apr-2013 17:05:09

Read more at: http://www.smh.com.au/world/ding-dong-sing-margaret-thatchers-foes-20130409-2hhs7.html

Four Nebraska Cops Fired After Caught on Camera Chasing Man into Home to Steal Camera

Four Nebraska cops were fired over an incident in which they tried their best to conceal, including beating a man and chasing his brother into a home to steal his camera all while unknowingly being recorded by another citizen from an upstairs window.

by Carlos Miller
PINAC
April 7, 2013

Another three officers were placed on leave and an additional officer was reassigned, according to the Associated Press.
However, Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer refused to release any of the officers’ names, meaning they will likely get hired at another police department in the near future.
After all, as hard as it is to fire a cop, it is even harder to prevent him from getting rehired as a cop where he will likely continue his unlawful ways.
Take the case of a South Florida cop who violated police protocol when he pursued a suspect down the wrong way of a Miami expressway this week, which resulted in the suspect striking another vehicle and killing its four occupants inside.
Opa-Locka police cpl. Sergio Perez had tried to pull the suspect over for making an illegal right turn. Departmental police only allows pursuits in serious felonies like murders, rapes or robberies.
Perez had been kicked out of the police academy for reckless driving but somehow managed to get hired by one of the most corrupt police departments in Miami-Dade County, the Opa-Locka Police Department as Miami blogger Random Pixels explains.

The Miami Herald did a good job on digging up his short, but extremely questionable police experience:

But just two months into his training, he crashed his car into another vehicle on I-95 while drag-racing at speeds in excess of 110 miles per hour, according to the FHP report. A city of Miami police detective witnessed the race, the report said. Perez, who was off duty, was taken into custody on reckless driving charges. It’s not clear from the report whether he was driving a patrol car or his personal vehicle.
But he was fired the following day and kicked out of the police academy.
He applied to Opa-locka a month later, noting on his application that the reason for leaving Miami Shores was because he “received a criminal traffic citation.’’
Opa-locka hired him a year later, in March 2008. There is no indication in his personnel file that the city conducted a background check or investigated why he left Miami Shores.
A month later, he was given a “post-accident substance control test,’’ which he passed. It’s not clear why the test was administered, since there is no accident report in his file.
In October 2009, a woman filed a lawsuit against the city, alleging that Perez punched her in the head with such force that surgeons had to reconstruct her face by inserting a metal plate. Included in the lawsuit is a copy of the surgeon’s report from Jackson Memorial Hospital, detailing the severity of her injuries.
Now four innocent people are dead  and while Perez was not the one who initially drove down the wrong way on the expressway, he holds at least some responsibility for the incident.
But we will probably hear from him again as a police officer and not in a good way.
http://intellihub.com/2013/04/07/four-nebraska-cops-fired-after-caught-on-camera-chasing-man-into-home-to-steal-camera/

More Intel Rumors

04/08/2013

[puppylove] "I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." :

[puppylove] GOD BLESS OUR BRAVE SERVICE MEN AND WOMEN BOTH PAST AND PRESENT … WE SALUTE YOU !!!! :

[Frenchy] According to ALL of the Reliable Sources WE are Here. It should be anytime I would think.. ALL the Sources Can't be Wrong.

puppylove] LETS TRY THIS.. WHEN YOU ARE HAPPY FOLKS AROUND YOU SMILE AND BECOME HAPPY TOO. WHEN YOU ARE NEGATIVE, THE FOLKS BECOME SAD. PLEASE STAY POSITIVE !!!

[burk50] Wang Dang say amnesty law Tues ,swipe cards Wed if this happens we have 90 cents then in a few days I think he believes full blown RV ,anyone listen to his call ??

[cashinqueen1] I have confirmation from my source that this is going to be an eye-opening week for us financially , politically militarly..... praying he is right

cashinqueen1] Expect the Unexpected Good advice. This week is just that week. It will not be a pleasant week for the naughties, but it will begin a non-stop march of the clean-up of planet Earth; financially, politically, militarily and continue onward into the health industries and world energy.

[cashinqueen1] Intend the best - its time!
....
redhead1] I guess I am really naive but I just keeping thinking if this is really done and I believe it is - who and why is it being held up.

[burk50] So what does everyone think ,many say been done just not announced ,Wang say when cards r swiped this Wed playfully we r in the money ??

[oucrazy] redhead1. . . not naive. . tired of the repitition with no new results.

 [spiritfilled] redhead1 I agree with you ...here is redwolf last nite [Redwolf] Again, if you read all the links posted today all indications would point to an event happening tomorrow. Rather than pick it we wait for more real world information to reveal itself. The time is still a mystery to all of us. I have h

 [sananddan24] Jetpack i believe it could happen anytime

[childofgod] redhead1 I don't think it is being held up, just hasn't shown yet IMHO

 [spiritfilled] . I have heard when Honk Kong opens too many times.

Diogenes] spiritfilled TY. Notice Redwolf said "the time is still a mystery to all of us."

[spiritfilled] Diogenes Good morning and he also said tomorrow not in the morning or any reference to a definite time...

[Diogenes] spiritfilled Yes, thank you. It is important to pay attention to the facts these real world intel guys bring. :)

burk50] Wonder what Alabama will say they thought announce,ent at 3 est ,say it's done just waiting for announcement ,I do like her call however

[spiritfilled] I still believe that all these countries are doing what is told by IMF and "gettting ready" for the release wold wide-with that the banks in all places that have been set to this point..like Canada and USA or still not going to release individually or tell anyone to "exchange" until the signal IMO..

[SGD3] spiritfilled Does your "tomorrow"mean today (Mon) or (tues?

spiritfilled] SGD3 this was said by Redwof last night and I am sure he was referencing Monday ...today...IMO

*************************
[jetpack]  honestly I've always felt and said we would never see public release of RV on a Friday thru Monday that it would be Tuesday thru Thursday

[jetpack]  they link to globally banking and tracking is always a Tuesday thru Thursday for good reasons, has been that way for any years even back during Kuwait RI

spiritfilled] jetpack Yes I heard that many times...so do you think if it is ready that Tuesday is a better possibility??..

[jetpack] spiritfilled IMHO yes Tuesday and Wednesday best two days, Kuwait was also a Wednesday late afternoon

[SGD3] jetpack Why do all say over the weekend mon,mon,mon..then on Mon we get Tues thru Thurs is more plausible?? Just asking a question

jetpack] SGD3 IMHO lack of knowledge

SGD3] jetpack and yet, most rv's have occurred on a fri...so much confusion

jetpack] SGD3 there's a difference between when RV occurred and out into systems and when released to public sector for example our RV could have been finally released internally but will not be released to public sector and systems til tomorrow

SGD3] jetpack makes sense- ty

****************************

[Papa Bear] GM Dinar Family

[Papa Bear] Did anyone notice Chinas words to N Korea about ratceting things up in the world?

 [Diogenes] Papa Bear GM sir. Please let us know. :)

[redhead1] PapaBear - I did but I also saw where N Korea has withdraw their people for facilities shared with S Korea and plans to go ahead and "test" their missels - I do not think their leader iis going to stop - someone has to take some action.

 [Papa Bear] redhead1 A missile falling in the sea is what we want at this point. also what the Bear IMHO thinks will happen especially after reading the Chinese response

Robertprofessor] Papa Bear China needs to get a message across to the reluctant and debt ridden US?

[redhead1] PapaBear - N Korea scares me because he is apparently so unstable - I would hope it falls in the sea but he could change his mind/coordinates at the last minute and really do something stupid.

[Papa Bear] Robertprofessor U think that hasnt aleady happened ? better ask WD or Jester

[Robertprofessor] Papa Bear N Korea can't do anything without Chinese permission or push.

 [Diogenes] IMO I don't think China is doing all the work to change the global economic situation to allow N. Korea to mess things up. Remember China is right next door to N. Korea. They have an intelligence service with agents too. :)

[misskitty05] redhead1 he scares me too ... too much testosterone flowing there but North Korea has no choice but to listen to China imo

Robertprofessor] misskitty05 This waiting is difficult enough on the emotions without listening to negative intel providers especially when we have very strong, very solid and very positive intel providers right here telling us the exact opposite.

misskitty05] Robertprofessor yes so true….But North Korea sure has provided a distraction for the world

Robertprofessor] misskitty05 Like maybe something truly big might take place on the global stage without gaining attention as the world, especially US "News" sources, are fixated on N Korean brinkmanship? Hm, an interesting "theory." lol

[misskitty05] Robertprofessor Well I have wondered more than once whether the NK scenario is all part of the disinformation/distraction plan .... who knows. At this point, just show mw the money lol

[Robertprofessor] misskitty05 I think it's all true, but the Chinese are pushing the buttons to force the US to stop blocking the reset.

[misskitty05] Robertprofessor thank goodness someone is!

[Readynow] Robertprofessor from your knowledge and opinion, are you still thinking today, or a little later in the week?

Robertprofessor] Readynow I think we can see the rv any day from here until it actually happens.

Robertprofessor] Readynow I expect the rv today. Failing that, I will expect the rv tomorrow. Failing that ...

************************
greasee5] midtex56 my question that was never answered by anyone, If the E.O. that allowed us to be in this is rescinded in May on the 22nd, what does that do to us as currency holders????

[Robertprofessor] greasee5 Why would the unfreezing of Iraqi funds have any effect on the dinars we hold?

[Readynow] Robertprofessor think he was referring to the executive order expiring in May

 [greasee5] Robertprofessor The only way to release the dfi funds is to rescind eo 13303, that is what we are led to believe allowed us into this speculation, If rescinded, what becomes of us???

 [Robertprofessor] Readynow But isn't that related to the funds?

 [Readynow] Robertprofessor I'm so lost I'm not sure of anything right now

[Robertprofessor] greasee5 I don't see how it effects. The dinar we hold is highly valuble especially to the Chinese who will pay a premium for it to gain Iraqi oil more cheaply later on. I'm unable to see a connection. Maybe there is one, and I don't get it.

[greasee5] Readynow EO's dont expire, but need to be rescinded, which is what the US said would take place on May 22nd

Robertprofessor] Readynow Yeah, I know what you mean.

[misskitty05] greasee5 and, I actually thought  that 13303 was not the actually authority for us to get into this deal ... there is a misunderstanding about that even tho 13330 is the one that is continually referenced ... heard that along the way imo

greasee5] misskitty05 well if its not, all paper work from currency dealers is wrong, they all cite eo13303, imo, look at your receipts

[Frenchy] greasee5 None of My Receipts Have that on them.

[Robertprofessor] greasee5 Are you concerned that after May 22, our dinars will be worthless if we don't r v first?

 [greasee5] Robertprofessor to us, yes

[misskitty05] greasee5 I bought much of mine from banks and they don't cite anything. I'm not worried about it. Can you imagine dinarians gone wild if we got scre$d like that!

[greasee5] Frenchy funny, all of mine do

[Robertprofessor] greasee5 I have not considered this or heard anyone else express it.

Robertprofessor] greasee5 Have you raised this question before? With WD, Jester or anyone else?

[greasee5] Robertprofessor ive asked about that for 2 years now, can not get an answer

[Frenchy] greasee5 This question was Brought up about a Month ago and we were told Not to worry about it..

 [greasee5] Frenchy by whom, do you remember?

 [Frenchy] greasee5 No I Don't remember I haven't given it any thought since.

[bonshoom] greasee5 sounds like an unsubstantiated fear that has no validity.

[greasee5] Robertprofessor Frenchy My main concern is this, eo is rescinded,ok, no rv/ce yet, iraq does something stupid, they are called an enemy of the state, i.e. iran, noone can do business with them, or face confiscation of accounts arrests, etc... we are in a pickle then, imo

blessedinohio] greasee5 I can't imagine after all this time that Bush & his buddies would ever allow this to just expire and eliminate our CE because it would affect them too.

spiritfilled] Robertprofessor Been watching this discussion...my take is ..IMO..if the Chinese want our currency and the plan for the last few years is to "secure" it for them with this private exchange, then if it does lose value because of this order..then the US will have all debt called in by China..IMO...wow.

Frenchy] greasee5 Iraq Is Out of it at this Point... There is Always and Forever going to be Conflict there, That is How they Operate. They want International Trade..

greasee5]  not trying to put a downer on anything, its just a question that nobody could or would answer, i appreciate everyones input, thank you

*************************

[spiritfilled] TexasMom Good morning..your source still ok with these next few days??

[TexasMom] spiritfilled haven't heard anything new since Friday. And, we were all looking for last night. One thing I do hang my hat on is WD saying Friday and Monday not good days to look for in banking.

**************************
[Papa Bear] Long quotes but since u think Im lieing here we go"Pres Xi state NO country should be allowed to throw the region and world into chaos for selfish gain

 [Papa Bear] # 2 Foreign minister stated Provacative words and actions from any party in region will not be allowed when causing trouble making on Chinas border. Other words IMHO Look out below

[windchimes] Papa Bear I heard that

[chocolatecoffee37] Oh yes, saw that as well.

rustyc] China's move to allow direct trade between the yuan and the Australian dollar is tipped to deepen financial links between the two countries and make the $120 billion-a-year trade relationship more efficient. Prime Minister Julia Gillard co Read more: 
http://www.theage.com.au/business/deeper-china-ties-coming-with-direct-currency-trade-20130408-2hha5.html#ixzz2Psg7whuc

[Papa Bear] rustyc More of this will occur in new financial system . AND more of an asset based economy

[rustyc] Papa Bear yes I expect it will imo

***************************

[xyz] US Treasury chief urges EU to ease off austerity By AP | 8 Apr, 2013, 04.51PM IST BRUSSELS: European countries should ease off their austerity and adopt more growth-friendly policies, US Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said Monday as he kicked off a series of meetings with the region's top leaders. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international-business/us-treasury-chief-urges-eu-to-ease-off-austerity/articleshow/19443540.cms

[xyz] Bye-Bye Bonds, Hello Equities: Central Banks http://www.cnbc.com/id/100622127    Central bankers are putting cash into riskier assets and exotic currencies to compensate for ultra-low returns on U.S. Treasurys, according to a poll of officials responsible for $7 trillion in reserves. The Financial Times reports.

[xyz] Iraq is not eligible for انظمام to the World Trade Organization because of enacting laws and absence of a national product 08-04-2013 10:58 AM 80674 Baghdad (news) .. Said the decision of the Commission of Economy and Investment MP / coalition of Kur   http://www.ikhnews.com/index.php?page=article&id=80674

[SGD3] Thought it was shown that they were part of WTO a long time go

blackjon] Washington denies supporting the Government of 'political majority' called by al-Maliki
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ar&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.peyamner.com%2FArabic%2FPNAnews.aspx%3FID%3D307562

http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2013/04/news-rumors-and-opinions-in-dinarland-monday-morning15.html

Iraqi's Saddam Hussein: CIA Asset - Client Dictator

- 1959: After failed attempt upon life  of Iraqi President General Qassim,  Saddam flees to Egypt. - In Cairo, Hussein repeatedly visits the  US Embassy, and meets with CIA agents  interested in the downfall of the Qassim  Government - PBS Frontline - Upon his return to Iraq, the CIA installs  Hussein in an apartment on al-Rashid St.,  directly opposite Qassim's office in Iraq's  Ministry of Defense, to observe his  movements. - UPI - 1963: President Qassim is assassinated  in the first Ba'athist coup. The United States  is among the first nations to recognize the  new government, and arms shipments begin  immediately. - The next five years bring two more CIA-backed  Ba'athist coups. Under their regimes, Western  business interests, such as Mobil, Bechtel and  British Petroleum begin operations in Iraq. - 1968: The final Ba'athist coup brings Ahmad  Hassan Al Bakr to power, who places his cousin,  Saddam Hussein in charge of the state security  apparatus.  - 1979: CIA asset, Saddam Hussein seizes power  in a palace coup - afterwards, he liquidates all  political opponents within the Iraqi Ba'ath party. - 1980: The incoming Reagan administration,  seeing the Islamic revolution in Iran as a threat,  encourages the subsequent Iraqi invasion of Iran,  with promises of arms, money and intelligence. - In addition to billions of dollars in arms, the  Reagan Administration provides the Iraqi Regime  with chemical and biological weapons. - One year after Iraq uses US-supplied chemical  weapons against Iranian troops, the Reagan  Administration resumes normal diplomatic relations  with Iraq, and removes it from the list of countries  that support terrorism [picture of Donald Rumsfeld  greeting Saddam Hussein]. - The Iran/Iraq War stretches on for 8 years, claims  over a million lives and bankrupts Iraq. - 1988: After the war ends, Iraq's erstwhile ally,  Kuwait floods the world oil market, lowering oil  prices, worldwide. - This undercuts Iraq's efforts to rebuild its  war-ravaged economy and infrastructure. - After Hussein's pleas fall on deaf ears, he begins  to consider military action against Kuwait. - When he informs the US about his plans to invade  Kuwait, US Ambassador, April Glaspie tells him: "We  (The United States) have no opinion on your border  dispute with Kuwait. James Baker (then Secretary of  State) has instructed our spokesmen to EMPHASIZE  this instruction." - Given this green light to invade Kuwait, Saddam  Hussein does so. - The Bush Administration immediately renegs on  its assurances, and begins preparations for war. - Iraqi offers to withdraw from Kuwait, in exchange  for convening a Middle East peace summit are ignored. - The rest is history... - September 11, 2001: Al-qaeda terrorists launch  a coordinated attack on the World Trade Centers  and the Pentagon - Using these attacks as a pretext, the Bush  Administration launches a second war against  Hussein's Iraq - Even though there are no links  between Iraq and the terrorists who executed the  9/11 attacks. - In this invasion, hundreds of Americans and  thousands of Iraqi civilians die. - December 13, 2003: 40-year veteran CIA-asset,  Saddam Hussein is handed over to US occupation  forces by an undisclosed Iraqi group. - Ladies and Gentlemen, we've always had him. Video (about 4 mins):  Iraq's Saddam Hussein: CIA Asset - Client Dictator