Thursday, April 18, 2013

Rumored Dead Black Ops NSA CIA Gene Chip Tatum Alive


Rumored Dead Black Ops NSA CIA Gene Chip Tatum Alive




By Stew Webb


During the last two days, I spoke with “dead” Chip Tatum, the long time CIA figure believed murdered years ago.
Tatum had been involved in assassinations for the U.S. Government and was tasked with killing a presidential third party candidate Ross Perot, a job he refused.
Radio 1997 Stew Webb Whistleblower and NSA-CIA Operative Gene Chip Tatum
Tatum asked that his new status “among the living” be announced on Veterans Today, perhaps to help him remain among the living.
FROM THE DEAD
Now, Tatum is back to life, speaking out and spilling his guts on drug running, mortgage fraud and Bush/Ollie North era frauds.
In 1995 Gene Chip Tatum came to me through and mutual friend, Iran-Contra Whistleblower Al Martin to help promote Gene’s story on numerous talk radio programs that I had been on as a guest on.
Gene and I did many of programs as guests.   In some cases the talk show hosts did not know what to ask Gene and allowed me to do the interviews, the above in just one of hundreds I saved and may even post to my website when I can get to those buried hidden tapes.
Gene delivered Cocaine to then Governor of Arkansas Bill Clinton for his personal use at the orders of Vice President George HW Bush and worked in the George HW Bush Shadow Government “Operation Black Eagle” also known as Iran-Contra directly answering to Col. Oliver North and Money Laundered to this reporters ex-in-law Leonard Millman and his Denver, Colorado partners-“Buffer” Larry Mizel  of MDC Holding, Inc a publicly traded company on the NYSE which was the parent company of Silverado Savings and Loan were Neil Bush the President’s son served on the Board of Directors as the CIA’s Narcotics Money Laundering operation.  Gene’s Military career began in Vietnam with “Operation Red Rock” bringing Cambodian into the Vietnam War.
Yes I have recently communicated with Gene Tatum and he does not want to do any interviews at this time.


A “Superhighway” to Israeli Rule in America


A “Superhighway” to Israeli Rule in America


Proposed Law Gives Israel a “Superhighway for Spying” in the US



By Gordon Duff and Press TV

Americans traveling to Israel need only to access the State Department’s travel warnings.  The US government officially warns its citizens who wish to visit Israel of the following:
“Some US citizens holding Israeli nationality, possessing a Palestinian identity card, or of Arab or Muslim origin have experienced significant difficulties in entering or exiting Israel or the West Bank. www.state.gov
UNITED STATES-ISRAEL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 2013
This is the name of a strange new law, proposed as part of a number of far reaching acts intended to force the US to abandon all diplomatic efforts to normalize relations with Iran.
The bluster about Iran is simply “window dressing.”  The real enemy is now and always has been the United States.  The intended legislation is simply a later stage of Israel’s “long game.”  The “goyim cow” has been milked, it has been starved and now it will be “finished off.”
Perhaps the cow will not go to slaughter as easily as predicted.  Israel’s plan, however, is one used so many times before.
OCCUPIED AMERICA
Despite this warning, AIPAC, the American/Israeli Public Affairs Committee, has submitted through Senator Barbara Boxer of California, a bill that would allow any and all Israeli citizens, including terrorists and spies, uncontrolled access to the United States.
Not all terrorists or spies would be allowed, only those defined by Israel as “racially Jewish.”
Over 120 of such “personnel” were returned to Israel on 9/12/2001, under White House secret protocols and violent objections from FBI counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism officials.
The story doesn’t end there, not by a long shot.
AN AMERICAN SURRENDER
The real purpose of the proposed law is two-fold:
  1.  The United States relinquishes      sovereignty over its territories to Israel, giving them the right to      decide who may or may not enter the US and eliminating all American      control over who can and cannot inter the US where “vital interests of  &nize: 10.p;  Israel esident Clinton signed the Treaty of Rome, establishing the International Crimimso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman";">
  2. To rescind US approval of      UN Resolution 242 and participation in the Fourth Geneva Convention and      International Criminal Court in all areas where “vital interests of Israel      apply.”
MAKING AMERICA AN OFFICIAL “CO-CONSPIRATOR”
Perhaps even more frightening is that the AIPAC/Boxer bill represents defacto withdrawal by the United States from participation in the Geneva Convention.  Other issues regarding participation in the International Criminal Court at The Hague make Boxer’s proposed legislation even more troubling.
Though President Clinton signed the Treaty of Rome, establishing the International Criminal Court, the Bush administration withdrew participation.  Many top officials of the Bush administration, including President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and others are subject to arrest and detention by order of the ICC.
In 2009, President Obama agreed to rejoin the court but has thus far failed to recognize either requests for extradition of US officials for war crimes or to comply with the Fourth Geneva Convention, to which the US is fully accountable, violations of which are subject to the authority of the ICC.
AMERICAS “INFANTICIDE” OF THE PALESTINIAN STATE
This is where the AIPAC/Boxer legislation enters “rough waters.”  If the US agrees to exclude Israel from traditional visa reciprocity, the US then, in effect, becomes a full participant in violations of the Geneva Convention as it applies to mistreatment of citizens of illegally occupied territories.
The term “illegally occupied” is not used carelessly.  The United Nations Security Council, in passing UNSCR 242 on November 2, 1967, was particularly clear as to the status of territories seized by Israel:
“…affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:
(i)                 Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”
Illegal control of this region and restrictions on travel by residents of these illegally occupied areas, if codified into US law as AIPAC/Boxer intends, makes the US, not just fully complicit in the criminal act of officially recognizing illegal occupation, it also rescinds US participation in the Geneva Conventions whose protection it depends but whose tenets it has systematically violated since 2002.
OCCUPATION AS A “WAR CRIME” AND OCCUPIERS AS “WAR CRIMINALS”
Were the US to officially recognize Israel’s right to, not just illegally occupy territory but, through restricting travel, engage in “collective punishment” of a people based on religion, race or ethnicity, any and all who “conspire” to encode such statutes are, in themselves, war criminals in accordance with the following statute:
“Fourth Geneva Convention (enacted August 1949) and recognized as having passed into ‘customary international law’ in 1993 (http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/icty/icty.html)
(I94 nations are fully signatory to the Fourth Geneva Convention)
Part II. General Protection of Populations Against Certain Consequences of War
Article 13. The provisions of Part II cover the whole of the populations of the countries in conflict, without any adverse distinction based, in particular, on race, nationality, religion or political opinion, and are intended to alleviate the sufferings caused by war.
Part III. Status and Treatment of Protected Persons
le="font-family: Courier; font-size: 10.0pt;">Reprisals against persons and their property are prohibited. to the conflict and to occupied territories
Article 32. A protected person/s shall not have anything done to them of such a character as to cause physical suffering or extermination … the physical suffering or extermination of protected persons in their hands. This prohibition applies not only to murder, torture, corporal punishments, mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment. While popular debate remains on what constitutes a legal definition of torture (see discussion on the Torture page), the ban on corporal punishment simplifies the matter; even the most mundane physical abuse is thereby forbidden by Article 32, as a precaution against alternate definitions of torture.
Article 33. No persons may be punished for an offense he or she has not personally committed. Collective penalties and likewise all measures of intimidation or of terrorism are prohibited.
Pillage is prohibited.(Bulldozing of homes is “pillage,” see Article 53)
Reprisals against persons and their property are prohibited.
(Additional Protocol II of 1977 explicitly forbids collective punishment.)
Section III. Occupied territories
Articles 47-78 An occupier may not forcibly deport protected persons, or deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into occupied territory (Art.49).
Art. 53. Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to other public authorities, or to social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.”
In accordance with the required reciprocity, as outlined in the proposed legislation, Israel will allow some Americans, excluding:
  1. WHAT CONSTITUTION?
    Can congress, even a congress “AIPAC controlled,” be it blackmail, bribery or threats of mysterious illnesses or plane crashes, pass legislation not just diminishing America’s control of its own territorial integrity but laws both morally repugnant and based on acceptance of practices long recognized as criminal?
    Israel, itself, has no constitution and no borders.  By that standard, the US may never have a treaty with Israel.  Think about why.
    WHEN IS “RECIPROCITY” NOT RECIPROCITY?
    In accordance with the required reciprocity, as outlined in the proposed legislation, Israel will allow some Americans, excluding:
    1. Those of African descent, unless they agree to sterilization and/or “chemical castration,”
    2. Americans whose political beliefs are “unacceptable” to Israel
    3. “Non-Jews” seeking to visit their native homeland.
    4. At a time when American citizens are facing severe budget cuts, the bill vows, “to continue to provide Israel with robust security assistance”. The bill accomplishes its pro-discrimination goal by mandating Israel’s entrance into the visa-free program provided that Israel “has made every reasonable effort, without jeopique right to send anyone they choose to the US including literally thousands of Israelis who are subject to indictment as war criminals or who have long been residing in Israel to avoid extradition for crimes ranging from fraud to serial murder.
      The wording of the bill is particularly disturbing.  The apparent rationale for America “bending over” for AIPAC is because of the threat of Iran.  From the Guardian:
      “The bill begins by reciting the standard narrative favored by the Israeli government: “the Government of Iran continues to pose a grave threat to the region and the world at large with its reckless uranium enrichment program and defiance of multiple United Nations Security Council resolutions.”
      At a time when American citizens are facing severe budget cuts, the bill vows, “to continue to provide Israel with robust security assistance”. The bill accomplishes its pro-discrimination goal by mandating Israel’s entrance into the visa-free program provided that Israel “has made every reasonable effort, without jeopardizing the security of the State of Israel, to ensure that reciprocal travel privileges are extended to all United States citizens’”.
      That is the special exemption that no other country in the program is permitted: Israel, alone in the world, is not required to reciprocate for US citizens but merely will make “every reasonable effort, without jeopardizing the security of the State of Israel, to ensure that reciprocal travel privileges are extended to all United States citizens.”
      Barbara Boxer/ AIPAC seek to codify Israel’s right to discriminate against Americans.
      The Guardian going further explains more of the significance of this proposed act:
      “…the bill sponsored by these American senators would exempt Israel from a requirement that applies to every other nation on the planet, for no reason other than to allow the Israeli government to engage in racial, ethnic and religious discrimination against US citizens… In sum, it is as pure and blatant an example of prioritizing the interests of the Israeli government over the rights of US citizens as one can imagine, and it’s being pushed by AIPAC and a cast of bipartisan senators.”
      Lara Friedman of Americans for Peace Now explains:
      “It takes the extraordinary step of seeking to change the current US law to create a special and unique exception for Israel in US immigration law….(overlooking) Israel’s regular and arbitrary denial of entry to US citizens . . . in particular US citizens of Arab descent or US citizens viewed as sympathetic to the Palestinians ”
      Mike Coogan of the US Campaign to End Israeli Occupation is quoted in the Guardian’s article:
       ”given that Israel views the mere existence of Palestinians as a threat, the [Boxer/AIPAC bill] would essentially codify Israel’s discrimination against Palestinian-, Muslim-, and Arab-Americans into US law…”
      FOOL ME ONCE…
      Increasingly, the Israel lobby is being seen as a Chimera, part lion, part goat and part snake, perhaps “mostly” snake.
      When Senator Chuck Hagel was nominated as Secretary of Defense, the Israel lobby had the Republican Party stand up and walk out of the senate chambers, every GOP member, even though Hagel is a respected member of their own party.
      When it served the Israel lobby to disarm Americans, their “friends” in the Democratic party introduced legislation, not just restricting gun ownership but diminishing other constitutional rights as well.  This legislation, characterizing  religious, veterans, and patriotic groups as terrorist threats was clearly aimed at disarming Americans likely to resist martial law after another “false flag” 9/11 type attack, one an increasing number of Americans are certain is being planned.
      The only question many have is how many “Sandy Hook” type incidents are scheduled before something even more “iconic” is scheduled?
      Boxer’s bill, should it sneak past an increasingly vigilant America, will make our next “9/11” free of the hundreds of embarrassing inconsistencies of the last one.
      http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/16/a-superhighway-to-israeli-rule-in-america/

THE SPECIFIC INDICTMENT of Bush Jr/ Obama/ CIA/ US Military “Torture of 9/11 Prisoners” at GITMO—is FINALLY CONFIRMED as a “WAR CRIME”

THE SPECIFIC INDICTMENT of  Bush Jr/ Obama/ CIA/ US Military “Torture of 9/11 Prisoners” at GITMO—is FINALLY CONFIRMED as a “WAR CRIME”– Equivalent to Prosecuted Nazi War Crimes and the Torture/ Internship Of Japanese Americans During WWII.

Nothing beats a sensational front page news story like a Boston Marathon Massacre!   Most readers likely missed the far more serious implication for the moral compass of America, the NY Times story by Scott Shane, entitled, “U.S. Practiced Torture After 9/11,  Non Partisan Review Concludes”.

In this article, both Asa Hutchinson [Republican/Bush Jr Administration] and James R. Jones [Democrat, Congress] indict the interrogation and tortures committed by Presidents Clinton [Rendition], Bush Jr [full menu of tortures], and Obama [Bush Jr in Black Face].

In essence,  this bipartisan report,  along with 6,000 pages of still classified docs  IMPLICATES THREE ADMINISTRATIONS of INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIMES—RENDITION, TORTURE, and ENHANCED INTERROGATION.

What does this mean in the midst of our frenzy to find ‘supposed terrorists’ of the Boston Marathon Massacre?

It means that, as I have previously repeated time and time again, we have had and still have Presidents who have willingly committed acts of International War Crimes Punishable by Death and / or Life Imprisonment.

Furthermore, to make matters even worse, the extensive investigations showed that the abominable, criminal activities of interrogation, torture, water boarding committed by the CIA, US military, US mercenaries and sanctioned by three presidents were like the wars themselves- totally useless.
In short, the USA is GUILTY of COMMITTING USELESS WAR CRIMES!!!

Have I, an experienced counter–terrorist expert with 30 years experience who had never had to touch even one detainee,  let alone torture or ‘interrogate’ anyone, suddenly had a fit of righteous indignation or just decided to vent his RELENTLESS FURY for UNREPENTANT SINS of our 3 PRESIDENTS and their MINIONS?

The answer lies not in the headlines nor in the hysterical media distractions of a tragic occurrence which I might have been able to predict (I think Patriarch did predict this),  had I known beforehand that this report would come out on the same day as the BOSTON MARATHON.

That’s right! You’ve got it! Once again, Obama in concert with FEMA, CIA, FBI, and other National Security minions—the usual ‘choir boy suspects’—decided to OFFER A DISTRACTION.
Bloody! Macabre! Inane!! Insensitive!

But please place this Boston Marathon along side the sacrifices that Bush jr was willing to make in terms of dead American bodies in 9/11—close to 3,000 innocent Americans in the World Trade Center alone.   The Boston Marathon Massacre is small potatoes in the theater of distractions for war crimes.

A decade ago,  Bush Jr had no qualms, of course, along with his close pal Cheney, of sacrificing a few thousand US military men in the useless Iraq War.  Don’t forget the hundreds of thousands of innocent Pakistanis, Yemenis, Afghanis, and Iraqis that Obama, Panetta, Tenet, Hayden, Brennan et al, are willing to sacrifice in the name of ‘terror’ or, excuse methe ‘war on terror’. 

So what’s a few Americans who were killed and injured in the Marathon Race?  Nothing, really,  in comparison to the full scope of the extent of the horror that Clinton, Bush jr  and Obama collectively had engaged in maiming the innocent; torturing the prisoners;  injuring and killing the countless thousands of innocent civilians; destroying societies and countries; and creating world wide MAYHEM and CHAOS—all for the sake of NATIONAL SECURITY??

Let me be more precise and list some of the issues that are relevant to the ‘torture’, ‘interrogation’ and ‘the legal consequences’ of those actions over a 30 year period since the Clinton Administration.

But first let’s go back, a bit further to WWII.
–A Japanese General was summarily executed by the US allies for waterboarding pilots who had been caught in the Jimmy DoLittle Raid on Tokyo.

– US Army soldiers during the Vietnam War summarily placed in prison for waterboarding Viet Cong prisoners of war.

–In 1948,  Norwegians executed German SS officers practicing ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ called ‘Versharfte Vernehmung’ developed by Gestapo Chief Heinrich Muller, using ‘sleep deprivation’, ‘extreme cold’, ‘suspension in stress positions’ and ‘deliberate exhaustion’.

–Navy Captain Albert Shimkus Jr, who ran a hospital for the prisoners at Gitmo protested the unethical behavior.

– Bill Clinton, Sandy Berger approved rendition.

–Bush jr, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Condi, Steve Hadley, Elliot Abrams, Gen. David Petraeus, Jose Rodriguez [head of CIA Covert operations], John Brennan, David Addington [WH staff],  all approved the use of severe interrogation methods including hypothermia, waterboarding, stress positions, abdominal beatings, genital torture, and other bodily and psychological harm according to Department of Justice Concurrence of Attorney General John Ashcroft as written in the paper by John Yoo.  Also concurring to these aforementioned methods were NSA Director General Michael Hayden, SecState Collin Powell, and DCI George Tenet .

–The only official to dissent officially and was subsequently reprimanded was Philip Zelikow, PhD who wrote a memo contesting the DOJ’s Torture Memo written by John Yoo  and others in “Justice”.

– Karl Rove told BBC in 2010: ”I’m proud that we kept the world safer than it was, by the use of these techniques. They’re appropriate, they’re in conformity with our international requirements and with US law”. 

–Cheney: ” I was and remain a strong proponent of our enhanced interrogation program.”

–Congresswoman, later Speaker of the House,  Nancy Pelosi [D, Cal. San Francisco] in a meeting with the CIA/Bush Jr Administration—WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORTED ENHANCED INTERROGATION AND TORTURE!  There goes our in-house LIBERAL—ALL THE WAY WITH TORTURE, PRINCESS NANCY! What happened to the infamous University of Berkley WAR PROTESTORS-IT’S ONE OF YOUR OWN !!! And what about your Pacific Heights Liberal Constituents?  Do they know that you are true blue SADIST and WAR CRIMINAL?

–But Congresswoman Jane Harmon also from California and a Democratic Liberal had the guts to dissent and object. But she was in the minority.

–James Steele, in charge of the US Death Squads [Paramilitary] in El Salvador where 75,000 civilians were killed was placed by Cheney and Rumsfeld as ‘OUR MAN IN IRAQ’ to train the counter insurgency.  Also involved with Elliot Abrams and Ollie North in the Iran Contra Affair. War criminal!!!

– Jose A, Rodriguez Jr,  the former Director of the National Clandestine Service for the CIA [served 31 years] and author of “Hard Measures: How Aggressive CIA Actions After 9/11 Saved American Lives”   This Puerto Rican “Torture Wonder” from the University of Florida could not stop lauding his incredible efforts at engaging in constant torture of 9/11 victimsto such an extent that he rode the celebrity circuit promoting his book of absurd observations: ”About 30 out of the 100 or so detainees that the CIA held were subjected to some harsh treatment.”

It’s this same ‘pobrecito’ who literally gave dictation to Kathryn Bigelow for her fictional film rendition of ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ and then after being reprimanded by me in an email to my contacts, Jose quickly recanted his story.  What an dishonorable, cowardly pobrecito!!!

General David Petraeus, who would become the DC I and tried to distance himself from Steele was deeply involved and knowledgeable about the torture and paramilitary death squads in Iraq.  My bad!! 
Even yours truly could be fooled by the presumed integrity of a man who had been shot by his friend on a shooting range and claimed that he was the innovator of the thousand year old counter insurgency theory.  What a liar.  Well, someone saw fit to put Petraeus in his proper place of ignominy.  Too bad for the honorable men and women who served him and were fooled by him as I was.  Petraeus is an example of how rampant sociopathy and self aggrandizement rages through our so called warrior leaders.


Pop Quiz on the Federal Income Tax - Peter Hendrickson / Lost Horizons Newsletter April 19, 2013


Friends,

Please take time to read this information. This is not a joke or a hoax. This is the truth. Peter Hendrickson is the author of “Cracking the Code”, a shocking exposé of the massive fraud and hoax that is the federal income tax system as it is implemented and enforced by the IRS.

Peter Hendrickson has made great personal sacrifices on behalf of the American people. He served time in prison on trumped-up false charges, at the instigation of government thugs and criminals, in order to deliver the truth to the American people. The least you can do is to listen to what he has to say.

DL

***********************************

It's Pop Quiz Time!
Take this little test to see just how tuned-up you are with the realities of the federal tax structure as laid out by the framers and amenders of the United States Constitution, interpreted by the Supreme Court, and implemented in current law.

The Quiz:
Top of Form

1. The American People at some point granted the federal government an ownership interest in the individual productive output (or economic gain) of not only every American alive at the time, but, by some mystical process, also in that of those yet unborn.
True
False
Both
Why should I care, I'm just a kid...
2. Americans have equipped the federal government with the power of a king-- that government can assert an ownership interest at will and seize what it wishes from the citizenry (although anyone aggrieved by the misuse of this power can try to vote abusers out of office afterward, if they haven't starved to death before election day).
True
False
Neither
I'm just looking, Your Majesty! Please don't punish me!!
3. The federal government has ownership interests only in its own property and delegated powers, and can only prosecute non-contract-based claims accordingly, relying on allegations of one of the aforementioned ownership connections.
True
False
Maybe
I don't think I'm allowed to make conclusions about things like this...
4. The "income" that the federal government can tax (that is, revenue in which it can assert an ownership interest) is "all that comes in" (that is, any or all revenue realized by anyone for doing anything).
True
False
I'm going to ask the IRS...
Whatever you say, your Worship!
5. The only "income" that the federal government can tax is the gainful revenue which results from the use of its own property or delegated powers.
True
False
How can that be?
My tax attorney says to STAY AWAY from this site!
6. "Information returns" (W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, etc.) are intended solely for the reporting of federally-connected "income" payments (and, in some cases, reporting amounts deposited against the possibility of tax liabilities being eventually defined), and all payments reported on an "information return" will be taken to be such, unless and until rebutted.
True
False
Huh?
But that would mean that most payers are violating the Eighth Commandment!
7. The Founders (and framers) deliberately restrained the ability of the federal government to acquire revenue at will in the fundamental law (the Constitution), because:
a. There is no legitimate basis of principle by which any government can assert an ownership interest, or claim of right, to someone else's property or proceeds without their consent;
b. They wished to prevent special interests from gaining influence in the government and enriching themselves at the expense of others;
c. They wished to prevent the government from being able to purchase the political sway necessary for it to escape the chains of the Constitution in other respects without effective impediment and from financing "swarms of officers" who will "harass our people" and "eat out their substance";
d. All of the above.
8. Knowing that every payment to you which is reported on an "information return" (a W-2, 1099 or K-1) is being alleged to have resulted from your conduct of a federally taxable activity, which of the following courses of action best serves to support the Founders and uphold the fundamental law in the face of incorrect information return reports:
a. Filing a return adopting those incorrect allegations as your own testimony (by transferring reported payment amounts to your own return, and/or attaching the "information return" to your return), and quietly accepting the resulting imposition of tax;
b. Rebutting the incorrect allegations, and testifying to what is actually true regarding the amount of federally taxable activity you engaged in during the previous year, in the single format Congress has required the executive branch (IRS and Treasury Dept.) to recognize and accept (a return);
c. Refusing to file a return at all-- thus acquiescing to the incorrect allegations by silence (default);
d. Refusing to file a return but sending letters, non-return affidavits, legal arguments, etc. to the tax agencies in a barrage of square pegs flung at the round hole into which nothing but a return will fit, and which will therefore all be ignored.
9. Tax agencies have the legal authority to:
a. Disregard a 1040-filer's testimony;
b. Give greater weight to agency-preferred allegations on an "information return" than to the declarations on a 1040;
c. Rule a return "frivolous" and treat it as never filed (and/or impose a penalty) because what is reported as "income" received disagrees with allegations made on "information returns";
d. None of the above.
10. By letting "information return" allegations that your economic activities are federally-connected stand uncorrected-- either by your adoption of those allegations, or by your effective silence-- you:
a. Validate and make real government claims to an ownership interest in those activities, and the imposition of a related tax;
b. Support presumptions of federal authority over how you conduct your economic activities;
c. Both (a) and (b);
d. None of the above.
11. Creating "information returns" (W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, etc.) about others (all of which inherently allege that payments YOU made involved federally-connected taxable activities):
a. Supports government claims to an ownership interest in YOUR activities, and the imposition of related taxes on YOU;
b. Support presumptions of federal authority over how you conduct your business;
c. Both (a) and (b);
d. None of the above.
12. Letting the federal government tax what is not really subject to tax under the law, either by declaring the receipts of others to be federally-connected when they are not (through the creation of incorrect "information returns"), or by actively or passively declaring your own receipts to be taxable when they really are not:
a. Utterly thwarts the Founder's wise safeguards;
b. Unleashes and equips Leviathan to trample from sea to shining sea (and beyond);
c. Allows Leviathan to do its trampling with your implicit approval;
d. All of the above.


Score =
Bottom of Form
SCORING
0 - 24% correct: I'm afraid you've gotten your "education" exclusively from the IRS.
25 - 49% correct: Your heart's in the right place, but you haven't yet started down the path to knowledge.
50 - 74% correct: You're well on the path, but still have some studying to do.
75 - 99% correct: You're on the very verge of self-empowerment...
100% correct: Hello, CtC Warrior!
The Answer Key:
Question 1: The American People at some point granted the federal government an ownership interest in the individual productive output (or economic gain) of not only every American alive at the time, but, by some mystical process, also in that of those yet unborn.
True
False
Both
Why should I care, I'm just a kid...
Correct response: "False". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 2: Americans have equipped the federal government with the power of a king-- that government can assert an ownership interest at will and seize what it wishes from the citizenry (although anyone aggrieved by the misuse of this power can try to vote abusers out of office afterward, if they haven't starved to death before election day).
True
False
Neither
I'm just looking, Your Majesty! Please don't punish me!!
Correct response: "False". I trust no commentary is needed here...

Question 3: The federal government has ownership interests only in its own property and delegated powers, and can only prosecute non-contract-based claims accordingly, relying on allegations of one of the aforementioned ownership connections.
True
False
Maybe
I don't think I'm allowed to make conclusions about things like this...
Correct response: "True". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 4: The "income" that the federal government can tax (that is, revenue in which it can assert an ownership interest) is "all that comes in" (that is, any or all revenue realized by anyone for doing anything).
True
False
I'm going to ask the IRS
Whatever you say, your Worship!
Correct response: "False". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 5: The only "income" that the federal government can tax is the gainful revenue which results from the use of its own property or delegated powers.
True
False
How can that be?
My tax attorney says to STAY AWAY from this site!
Correct response: "True". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 6: "Information returns" (W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, etc.) are intended solely for the reporting of federally-connected "income" payments (and, in some cases, reporting amounts deposited against the possibility of tax liabilities being eventually defined), and all payments reported on an "information return" will be taken to be such, unless and until rebutted.
True
False
Huh?
But that would mean that most payers are violating the Eighth Commandment!
Correct response: "True". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 7: The Founders (and framers) deliberately restrained the ability of the federal government to acquire revenue at will in the fundamental law (the Constitution), because:
a. There is no legitimate basis of principle by which any government can assert an ownership interest, or claim of right, to someone else's property or proceeds without their consent;
b. They wished to prevent special interests from gaining influence in the government and enriching themselves at the expense of others;
c. They wished to prevent the government from being able to purchase the political sway necessary for it to escape the chains of the Constitution in other respects without effective impediment and from financing "swarms of officers" who will "harass our people" and "eat out their substance".
d. All of the above.
Correct response: "d". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 8: Knowing that every payment to you which is reported on an "information return" (a W-2, 1099 or K-1) is being alleged to have resulted from your conduct of a federally taxable activity, which of the following courses of action best serves to support the Founders and uphold the fundamental law in the face of incorrect information return reports:
a. Filing a return adopting those incorrect allegations as your own testimony (by transferring reported payment amounts to your own return, and/or attaching the "information return" to your return), and quietly accepting the resulting imposition of tax;
b. Rebutting the incorrect allegations, and testifying to what is actually true regarding the amount of federally taxable activity you engaged in during the previous year, in the single format Congress has required the executive branch (IRS and Treasury Dept.) to recognize and accept (a return);
c. Refusing to file a return at all-- thus acquiescing to the incorrect allegations by silence (default);
d. Refusing to file a return but sending letters, non-return affidavits, legal arguments, etc. to the tax agencies in a barrage of square pegs flung at the round hole into which nothing but a return will fit, and which will therefore all be ignored.
Correct response: "b". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 9: Tax agencies have the legal authority to:
a. Disregard a 1040-filer's testimony;
b. Give greater weight to agency-preferred allegations on an "information return" than to the declarations on a 1040;
c. Rule a return "frivolous" and treat it as never filed (and/or impose a penalty) because what is reported as "income" received disagrees with allegations made on "information returns";
d. None of the above.
Correct response: "d". Click here and here for some relevant observations.

Question 10: By letting "information return" allegations that your economic activities are federally-connected stand uncorrected-- either by your adoption of those allegations, or by your effective silence-- you:
a. Validate and make real government claims to an ownership interest in those activities, and the imposition of a related tax;
b. Support presumptions of federal authority over how you conduct your economic activities;
c. Both (a) and (b);
d. None of the above.
Correct response: "c". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 11: Creating "information returns" (W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, etc.) about others (all of which inherently allege that payments YOU made involved federally-connected taxable activities):
a. Supports government claims to an ownership interest in YOUR activities, and the imposition of related taxes on YOU;
b. Support presumptions of federal authority over how you conduct your business;
c. Both (a) and (b);
d. None of the above.
Correct response: "c". Click here for some relevant observations.

Question 12: Letting the federal government tax what is not really subject to tax under the law, either by declaring the receipts of others to be federally-connected when they are not (through the creation of incorrect "information returns"), or by actively or passively declaring your own receipts to be taxable when they really are not:
a. Utterly thwarts the Founder's wise safeguards;
b. Unleashes and equips Leviathan to trample from sea to shining sea (and beyond);
c. Allows Leviathan to do its trampling with your implicit approval;
d. All of the above.
Correct response: "d". Click here for some relevant observations.
Is this newsletter of any value to you? If so, please consider
a donation to help keep it available. Donations can be sent to:
Peter Hendrickson
232 Oriole St.
Commerce Twp., MI 48382



AMERICA, YOUR WAKE-UP CALL IS COMING!
ON APRIL 19, 2013, losthorizons.com will present 850 pieces of concrete evidence proving that the average American has been wearing the rube suit at the carnival for decades of fleecing at the hands of corrupt public officials. Come Friday the 19th, navigate to http://losthorizons.com/LightsOn.htm at 12:00 PM EDT (or later) and discover that Uncle Remus was right: "It ain't what ya don't know that hurts ya. What really puts a hurtin' on ya is what ya knows for sure, that just ain't so."
Spread the word, my friends, and if you "facebook", visit https://www.facebook.com/events/356826994423767/ and "share the event"!





WHO DONE IT AND WHY


Dr. William Mount
WHO DONE IT AND WHY
Wed Apr 17, 2013 03:52

When investigating Mass Crimes all one has to do is point to one piece of evidence so compelling so as to show that some part of the US Corporation not only pre-planned the event but carried it out to kill, murder and destroy.

Of course - the US Corporation is owned by the IMF (USC 2 Sec 286) in London, and London is owned
by the Vatican.  (See Klovenback 's Interview 15 Apr 2000).

Let us look at some examples:


1) Pearl Harbor. "Honolulu Hilo Tribune Herald News Paper" announced the attack on Pearl Harbor 7 days before it occurred (30 Nov 1940) AND "Lord MOUNT Batten" faxed to the Japanese in April 1941 exactly where the US Battleships would be on 7 Dec 1941 and the Bombing Runs needed for the Japanese to create Maximum Carnage at Pearl Harbor.

2) Waco: US Army Combat Engineer Tank ON SITE fired a 40 pound charge of C-4 into the nursery. Our US Army Combat Engineer M-60 Tank was pre-positioned for the attack in WACO days in advance.

3) Oklahoma City: The FBI showed up in full riot gear 30 minutes after the explosion AND the FBI showed 2 In-Wall bombs within 30 minutes after the explosion.

4) 9/11.  In the film: "Obama is really a Muslim" we see the Fire Department in Full Regalia (Oxygen Tanks and Mast) blocking the streets outside the World Trade Center and the camera spins up to show the plane hit the first World Trade Center AND the 20 foot tall Lamp Posts 20 feet away from the hole in the Pentagon were still standing after the explosion.

Ever seen New York City streets with NO traffic - see the 9/11 films.

5) Aurora Colorado Theater Shooting: There was no blood in the Theater.

6) Mall shooting in Oregon: The FBI was there in 10 minutes with a full FBI Headquarters AND we talked about it before it occurred AND the US Special Forces were there to kill the shooter after the first shot.

7) Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting: The sidewalk where they were leading the children away from Sandy Hook - the one shown on ABC/NBC/CBS/FOX/CNN - there is NO sidewalk at Sandy Hook Elementary School - see the Aerial Photos. It was filmed 2.4 miles away at a Nursery School.  A Complete Hoax.

8) The Boston Massacre - the Boston Marathon Bombings - a few days ago: The Pre-Positioned stretchers, a Bomb Drill by the Boston Police the same day, the TV Show actually showing this occurring before the actual bombing?

9) The Same Day as this Boston Massacre there was a huge bombing in Iraq killing 46 people.

See: Whatdoesitmean.com

Individually - if you contest each incident you are called a Conspiracy Nut.

Together they paint a Grim Picture of the Evils of Rome and how they have woven their Demon Possessed People into power structure in the US to create massive carnage (Carnegie) and pain around this world.

In a recent article the Italian Supreme Court President openly blames those 200 Industrialists who work directly for the Rothschilds and meet in the Bilderberger Hotel yearly for ALL of the bombings and Mass Shooting in Italy and in Europe.

See: Bilderberger Behind Terrorist Attacks: "Italian Supreme Court President Drops Bombshell."

As a side note it was those in the Royal Order of the Garter who planned, and executed, the 9/11 tragedy. The orchestrator of the event is dead, but those who built the planes, fired the Missiles, and launched the Drone to crash in Pennsylvania are still alive and well and completely Demon (Archon) Possessed. Those involved in this attack and spoke out are dead or in Solitary Confinement in prison for life.

When the Light Workers for the United Nations call down the Demons (Archons) from the 4th Dimension through the Astral Planes they also bring with them many, many other Inter-Dimensional species that are quite evil.

The only hope for Humanity is to somehow either figure out how to send these species back to where they came from, or for some advanced entities to do some house cleaning here in this plane of existence.

Either way, this dimension must be cleared or Humanity will repeat this cycle of building up and being destroyed again and again with no end in site.

De'Ja' Vu.

Please type into your Search Engine Google.ru
Then type: Archons feed off of our Negative Emotions

Your eyes will be opened as to the UN broadcasts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For You Intel Geeks:

1) If these stories seem too deep and esoteric they are meant for those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.

2) The World Leaders can never really be free to lead unless they are free of these Inter-Dimensional Creatures like the Archons.

Yes - they are placed in their leadership rolls because they are Demon Possessed but can never really lead until they free themselves of these creatures. They will always be slaves to these evil creatures.

3) When expelling a Demon HARP Music works very well, this is the easiest way to "Cast Out" the Demons. It is all about the frequencies.

Exorcism is all about the person wanting to be free and then telling these entities to leave. The HARP Music gets their attention "Right Quick."

If the person who was "Exorcised" then goes back to their same old habits - walk away and let them be destroyed. Their Blood is on their own heads.

4) Whoever I am personally tied into - be it Metatron like the Psychics say, or "GOD" as others say - the Demons (Archons) cannot stand in my presence without becoming highly agitated and lash out at me in many different ways.

Although I have no abilities to do anything, whoever I am tied into does.

IE: See the latest Earthquake Map. A few large ones - just like we stated here on APFN?

5) By the way: Protect Obama 28 April.

6) As for the fellow who had a dream about an Earthquake by 15 April 2013 and then moved out because of fear: When we have dreams or see things this may need an interpreter.

If you were the Pharaoh (King) of Egypt and saw 7 skinny cows eating 7 fat cows it does not mean a cows will actually eat cows - what it meant was 7 years of plenty and 7 years of famine and it took Joseph to interpret it.

What your dream actually meant was for you to leave your apartment and be prepared for a Set Back in your own life - both Financially and Spiritually. You must re-examine your belief system and untie your life. You know where I live and my door is always open to you. You are trying to follow GOD and I admire this in you.

7) Just who did the Boston Bombings are as follows: The US State Department let in Foreigners (Illegal Aliens) in to work with the local FBI (Homeland Security) to set up and orchestrate the bombings. The planning began in Dec 2012 in the DC office.

In the end the FBI will show some Crazed White Male Skin Head Racist "White Supremist" who owns guns as the bomber.

8) As for Chuck Hagel stating: "The Pentagon Is Ready" - what are you ready to do, arrest the director of Homeland Security and the Director of the FBI?  You work for them (HR845) and must bow to them. You do not have the guts to arrest them.

Chuck Hagel: You are a "Blow Hard", a ranting raving Lunatic, and a Liar AND Very Demon Possessed. In your latest lie you have just lost the confidence of all of your subordinates. No one will ever trust you again.

9) New York Governor - you have violated the constitution of 1796 (2nd Amendment) and 1871 (Discrimination) and are now placed before the Judgement Throne of the Living GOD for judgement in accordance with your own laws. Both you and your Lieutenant Governor now have cancer as a sign from above that you will both be judged.

10) Coast To Coast - it is time for me to be on your show. There will be no mention of the past - only the future. As a sign that I am correct the I AM That I AM will send some personal quakes into the lives of your hosts. You know how to reach me.

PS: By the way John B Wells, my personal Number is 23. It's a long story.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please Pray that somehow we eliminate these Inter-Dimensional Creatures (Demons) from this plane of existence.

You Heard It First here on APFN.
Dr. William B. Mount

Subject: new articles on APFN
To: discussionapp-daily-updates@www.yourwebapps.com
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2013, 11:26 PM
They May Have Just Taken down GodLikeProductions.com. - willpwilson 908, Tue Apr 16 17:10
JEFF SCOTT - SURVEILLANCE BY SECRET SERVICES, AMMACH 2013 - butlincat2012, Tue Apr 16 18:23
The Lord of Lords, the I Am, Will Reign Over Man Not Satan, - willpwilson 908, Tue Apr 16 19:08
Fire in the Sky over Canton, Ohio - PS Post, Tue Apr 16 19:36
Chelsea school shooter: Gun control won’t help - ed63, Tue Apr 16 21:16
WHO DONE IT AND WHY - William Mount, Wed Apr 17 03:52
Another suspicious letter found, this one to Obama - APFN, Wed Apr 17 04:52
Boston Bombing Culprits Identified? - APFN, Wed Apr 17 05:08
Call for Federal Investigation of Psychiatric Drugs, - ed63, Wed Apr 17 05:57
Spirit Us Love - Patrick Sullivan, Wed Apr 17 08:00
Starting in 1996, Americans have been eating genetically mod - ed63, Wed Apr 17 09:28
RICIN GAS SCARE - ANOTHER WHITE HOUSE LIE - William Mount, Wed Apr 17 11:22
ALEX JONES WORKS FOR THE DOD - William Mount, Wed Apr 17 11:32
The Obamas Have Been Frauds & Liars For a LONG Time. - APFN, Wed Apr 17 12:49
The Marathon Mayhem HOAX - APFN, Wed Apr 17 13:26
The Truth EXPOSED! pt 1 (My Response) - APFN, Wed Apr 17 14:32
The Truth EXPOSED pt 2c - APFN, Wed Apr 17 15:00