The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
Two More Victims Of The Retail Apocalypse: Family Dollar And Coldwater Creek
Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 18-Apr-2014 10:43:21
Date: Friday, 18-Apr-2014 10:43:21
|
GLoryWalker: Here's a great article in the IMF impasse
David Marsh, Special for USA TODAY April 16, 2014
IMF overhaul is in U.S. interest
Developing-country economies may be smoldering and about to go up in flames — but the inhabitants of Congress, like Emperor Nero in Ancient Rome, are still fiddling away merrily, impervious to the world outside.
An impasse in Congress over extra powers and new money for the International Monetary Fund, the 70-year-old institution at the center of world finance, is endangering the stability of the global economy at an ill-starred time.
During the annual spring meeting of the IMF and World Bank amid the cherry blossoms of Washington this past weekend, I sensed a palpable bitterness and frustration about American intransigence among delegates from developing and developed countries alike.
....
David Marsh, Special for USA TODAY April 16, 2014
IMF overhaul is in U.S. interest
Developing-country economies may be smoldering and about to go up in flames — but the inhabitants of Congress, like Emperor Nero in Ancient Rome, are still fiddling away merrily, impervious to the world outside.
An impasse in Congress over extra powers and new money for the International Monetary Fund, the 70-year-old institution at the center of world finance, is endangering the stability of the global economy at an ill-starred time.
During the annual spring meeting of the IMF and World Bank amid the cherry blossoms of Washington this past weekend, I sensed a palpable bitterness and frustration about American intransigence among delegates from developing and developed countries alike.
....
Senior policymakers repeatedly told me that U.S. obstructionism is depriving the IMF of funding needed to ward off serious financial problems in key emerging-market countries, which could have serious repercussions on the U.S. as well as other parts of the world.
All this is coinciding, I was told, with deep-seated tectonic shifts in the world economic balance of power.
States such as Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia and Turkey, outside the industrialized countries that used to run the international economy, now wield greater clout.
One of the most influential attendees, deceptively softly-spoken Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the Singapore finance minister and deputy prime minister, said that, as financial and economic power moved away from the West, the U.S. risked suffering "disruptive change" in the next 10 years unless it accommodated developing countries' requests for more say in running world financial institutions.
In some cases, these are exactly the countries that may face financing problems caused by withdrawals of hot money flows as global capital washes back to the U.S. in the wake of withdrawal of monetary stimulus by the Federal Reserve. The more powerful countries among the fast-emerging developing nations have, thanks to globalization, made great strides in economic growth, living standards and stocks of monetary reserves.
But, simultaneously, because of the cross-border nature of capital flows, and their openness to adverse swings in currency movements, officials say they are also the most vulnerable.
In addition, these countries express irritation about what they see as the head-in the-sand approach of the world's biggest economy, the U.S. The large developing economies, led by China, India and Brazil, helped inject extra dynamism into the world economy after the financial crisis in 2008-09, helping the industrialized world (led by the U.S.) to recover.
Now that the world economy is gradually on the mend, and the Federal Reserve is gradually tightening credit again, these countries argue that the richer western nations need to pay attention to
That's why other countries are angry about Congress' failure to ratify a 2010 agreement among IMF members that would overhaul the fund. The changes would: double the IMF's quota — in effect, its equity capital — to $720 billion; shift six percentage points of total quota to emerging markets; and move two of the 24 IMF directorships from European to developing countries.
Some Republicans who oppose the agreement question the IMF's value to U.S. taxpayers and argue that ratification could undermine U.S. authority over IMF spending.
U.S. obfuscation over the IMF's resources could leave the world's foremost financial police officer perilously short of funds at a time when heavyweight countries such as Brazil, Turkey and South Africa may need financial support in the next 12 to 24 months to counter capital outflows.
The worries about financing vulnerable emerging-market economies are an additional factor overhanging stock markets, which look set to suffer a major contraction in coming weeks from highs driven by bullishness over corporate valuations.
Concerns about Ukraine-Russia tension, as well as the euro area — where deep underlying problems remain, despite last week's capital market return of serial offender Greece — loom large.
In Washington, the Group of 20 industrialized nations issued a communiqué saying they were "deeply disappointed" by failure to implement IMF changes. They gave the U.S. until the end of the year to do so, threatening to leave America out of new changes otherwise.
David Marsh is chairman of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF), a London-based think tank that promotes dialogue between private-sector and public institutions on world finance.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/04/16/marsh-congress-imf-developing-countries/7779953/
All this is coinciding, I was told, with deep-seated tectonic shifts in the world economic balance of power.
States such as Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia and Turkey, outside the industrialized countries that used to run the international economy, now wield greater clout.
One of the most influential attendees, deceptively softly-spoken Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the Singapore finance minister and deputy prime minister, said that, as financial and economic power moved away from the West, the U.S. risked suffering "disruptive change" in the next 10 years unless it accommodated developing countries' requests for more say in running world financial institutions.
In some cases, these are exactly the countries that may face financing problems caused by withdrawals of hot money flows as global capital washes back to the U.S. in the wake of withdrawal of monetary stimulus by the Federal Reserve. The more powerful countries among the fast-emerging developing nations have, thanks to globalization, made great strides in economic growth, living standards and stocks of monetary reserves.
But, simultaneously, because of the cross-border nature of capital flows, and their openness to adverse swings in currency movements, officials say they are also the most vulnerable.
In addition, these countries express irritation about what they see as the head-in the-sand approach of the world's biggest economy, the U.S. The large developing economies, led by China, India and Brazil, helped inject extra dynamism into the world economy after the financial crisis in 2008-09, helping the industrialized world (led by the U.S.) to recover.
Now that the world economy is gradually on the mend, and the Federal Reserve is gradually tightening credit again, these countries argue that the richer western nations need to pay attention to
That's why other countries are angry about Congress' failure to ratify a 2010 agreement among IMF members that would overhaul the fund. The changes would: double the IMF's quota — in effect, its equity capital — to $720 billion; shift six percentage points of total quota to emerging markets; and move two of the 24 IMF directorships from European to developing countries.
Some Republicans who oppose the agreement question the IMF's value to U.S. taxpayers and argue that ratification could undermine U.S. authority over IMF spending.
U.S. obfuscation over the IMF's resources could leave the world's foremost financial police officer perilously short of funds at a time when heavyweight countries such as Brazil, Turkey and South Africa may need financial support in the next 12 to 24 months to counter capital outflows.
The worries about financing vulnerable emerging-market economies are an additional factor overhanging stock markets, which look set to suffer a major contraction in coming weeks from highs driven by bullishness over corporate valuations.
Concerns about Ukraine-Russia tension, as well as the euro area — where deep underlying problems remain, despite last week's capital market return of serial offender Greece — loom large.
In Washington, the Group of 20 industrialized nations issued a communiqué saying they were "deeply disappointed" by failure to implement IMF changes. They gave the U.S. until the end of the year to do so, threatening to leave America out of new changes otherwise.
David Marsh is chairman of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF), a London-based think tank that promotes dialogue between private-sector and public institutions on world finance.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/04/16/marsh-congress-imf-developing-countries/7779953/
