Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Korea: We Are Badass, Fear Us, Please

Korea: We Are Badass, Fear Us, Please
 

February 24, 2015: Since Kim Jong Un took over in 2011 he has presided over some fundamental shifts in North Korea. He maintained the free market legalization his father had introduced and reversed his father’s “military first” policy. This means the Workers Party (a nationalist/socialist organization that runs the country under the supervision of the Kim family) is again running the military. This appears to mean that the military budget (a state secret) has been cut to provide money to boost the economy. Thus after nearly two decades of annual declines in GDP, the economy has been growing. South Korean economists and banks estimate that the North Korean GDP growth was .8 percent in 2011, 1.3 percent in 2012, 1.1 percent in 2013 and a similar increase for 2014. Many attribute this continued growth to a 2012 decision of officially recognize that those who produced more should get more. It was not legal to be economically successful before that change. Since then the government has realized that this rapidly growing entrepreneur class is a potential threat to the Kim dynasty. At the same time the Kims were aware that the wealth this entrepreneur class was creating was keeping the economy afloat. More attention is being paid to keeping the entrepreneur class under control without destroying their economic benefits.  
From the beginning of his rule Kim Jong Un has showed more determination than expected. The most obvious example of that was how he has executed dozens of officials who he felt were not completely behind the new way of doing things. This included senior military leaders. Kim Jong Un is in the process of replacing many senior commanders with men he has more trust in. They replace men who either retired, were arrested or simply disappeared from view. All these changes produced more reports of hungry troops living in poorly heated barracks during the cold weather who now spend even more time on non-military activities (farming, construction, factory work or being rented to commercial firms for short periods). Thus recent calls for more “combat readiness” and “modern weapons” by Kim Jong Un are seen as purely propaganda. A growing number of troops who consider themselves uniformed slaves of the state for the now extended (for up to 12 years) period of conscription most males muse endure. A new law obliges all women to serve for a few years as well.
Kim Jong Uns brutal methods contributed to the recent UN investigation of North Korean labor camps, secret police and arbitrary executions ordered by the supreme leader. The UN declared this bad behavior crimes against humanity (but not genocide, as some had urged). Kim Jong Un dismissed all this as an American-sponsored plot to hurt North Korea. UN officials openly admit that it is unlikely the results of this investigation will have no immediate effect on North Korean behavior. But the report does make it more difficult for other countries to support North Korea in any way.
Kim Jong Un has also been unsuccessful at keeping South Korean culture out of the north. Most North Koreans now know much about South Korea and admire, or at least envy, the culture that is flourishing in the south. It wasn’t until the late 1990s that most North Koreans began to realize that the south was not, as decades of government propaganda had insisted, wretchedly poor but was in fact a much more prosperous and pleasant to live in. Over the next two decades more and more details of South Korean culture got to the north and with that a demand (from the people with any money, initially just the leadership class) for South Korean goods, including music and video. South Korean clothing, jewelry and even furniture became so popular that factories in China began turning out replicas to be exported to North Korea. That stuff has since been outlawed but some is still smuggled in. Kim Jong Un has increased efforts to keep South Korean artifacts out, realizing more than his father that these particular foreign influences could bring the government down. Meanwhile those allowed to travel regularly to China (traders, government officials and the like) keep a growing number of South Korean themed (or staffed) businesses going. China has refused North Korean requests to shut these enterprises down. China would prefer that North Korea be more like South Korea at least in terms of economic activity.
The growing use of soldiers for purely economic functions has coincided with the increased use of slave labor as a source of foreign exchange. This is basically the export of North Korean workers which in the last year has increased from 60,000 to 100,000 men and women. The government takes up to 90 percent of the wages these men and women earn outside the country (mainly in Russia and China) and holds the workers’ families hostage in case the worker does not return home when ordered. If someone does not come back, their families are sent to prison camps. For most of them this means an early and unpleasant death. For this reason most of the exported workers are older men with children. There are over 100,000 of these workers outside the country now, nearly triple the number used before since Kim Jong Un took over. Inside North Korea there is also a lot of slave labor in the form of prisoners rented out to firms. The most common source is the Labor Training Camps. These are for those sentenced to short (under six months) sentences for minor crimes. Usually these prisoners are rented out to work on construction sites or farms. In effect the profits from all this forced labor help to maintain the economic rewards program North Korean leaders have been depending on more and more to guarantee the loyalty and efficiency of the bureaucracy (managers, secret police and intelligence operatives) that keep the Kim family in power.
Officially the government still backs offensive military operations, even though the North Korean forces are less ready and their Cold War era weapons and equipment continue to serve because there is no money for replacements. Kim Jong Un attends well publicized military exercises for seizing South Korean islands near North Korea but this is all for show because each year North Korean troops grow less able to make such an attack while their South Korean adversaries grow more capable because of more and more new weapons and better trained troops.
Attempts to negotiate with North Korea over their nuclear and ballistic missile programs remain stalemated because Kim Jong Un is still seeking a high price for any sort of concession. North Korea continues to hold out for a major gift (size unspecified but apparently more than the United States and the neighbors are willing to pay) to get the north to shut down their nuclear and long-range ballistic missile programs. This is seen as such a threat that even China is getting more nervous about and more extreme in its threats to North Korea over the matter.
All this has been overshadowed (in Western media at least) by events in the Middle East. Despite the declining ISIL (Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant) prospects a recent opinion poll in the United States showed that 84 percent of Americans believe ISIL is the most serious threat over the next decade. International terrorism also has 84 percent of Americans concerned. Iranian nukes frighten 77 percent followed by North Korea (64 percent) and Russia (49 percent, actually a tie with the Islamic effort to destroy Israel).  North Korea has to raise its PR and propaganda game if they want to regain their reputation as the biggest threat. The problem is that North Korea has been at this “we are badass, fear us” game for over half a century and a lot of their techniques have lost their punch. It’s bad enough being poor and unsuccessful, but to also be ignored is particularly painful to the North Korean leadership.
Some of North Korea’s effort to be badass are pathetic. For example recently leaked documents and admissions by the NSA (American National Security Agency) confirmed that that the United States had penetrated and clandestinely monitored North Korea’s Internet as early as 2010 and described how this led to determining that North Korea was indeed behind the recent hacking of the Sony Corporation’s computer networks.  That North Korea was behind the Sony hack was long suspected. That the U.S. had long ago penetrated and was monitoring the North Korean networks was always thought possible, but there was never any proof.
Another example is the recent discovery that the website of the North Korean government owned and operated Korean Central News Agency was equipped to secretly plant (or try to plant) spyware on the PCs of people visiting the site. The infection code was set up so that the operators of the North Korean site could easily deliver different kinds of infections. This infection capability was apparently set up in 2012 and it is still unclear how many, if any, visitors were infected and exactly with what. Not everyone visiting the site would be infected when the North Korean system was rigged to deliver a payload to visitors because visitors with well-protected systems (like Internet security experts or anyone with a high-end antivirus system) would, at most, get an alert that this North Korea site was trying to infect them. It’s possible that the infection code was there as part of a training exercise for North Korean hackers. The code was not of the highest quality and looks like something student hackers might put together. Like just about everything else in North Korea the details of this hidden infection code are a state secret. So we have to wait for North Korea to collapse or for one of their hackers to defect to find out what is going on here. Whatever it is, it ain’t good but it ain’t very effective either.
February 15, 2015:  North Korea officials have ordered security agencies to do whatever is necessary to keep copies of the new American film “The Interview” out of the country. This film angered North Korea a great deal and illegal copies quickly appeared all over China. It is believed copies of the film are already in North Korea but passed around very carefully because the government apparently intends to execute some of those caught with the film and send the rest to labor camps. In part that is because reaction to the film in China was overwhelmingly positive and North Korean officials fear the film will also be popular with many North Koreas. Most Chinese thought the film was hilarious and an instant classic. Some Chinese web sites translated the film title to “Assassinate Kim Jong Un,” which was an intentional dig at the North Koreans. A few Chinese government owned media “reviewed” The Interview and did not seem as pleased with the film as the average Chinese. One government controlled media reviewer described it as; “senseless cultural arrogance.”  Interestingly the Chinese government did not order its Internet censors to crack down on these online messages discussing the film or try to interfere with the illegal distribution of The Interview inside China.  All this angered North Korea even more because China is the only major ally North Korea has. But China has not been pleased with North Korea lately, especially North Korean development of nuclear weapons and long range ballistic missiles. The Chinese government knows the average Chinese is even less happy with North Korea and allowed this reaction to The Interview to play out in order to send a message to North Korea. This is a common way to send a message in East Asia and North Korea did not show any official displeasure at the disrespect. They got the message, even if they did not like it. North Korea is not pleased with the fact that the movie is apparently going to make money, but is much more upset at the message from China.
February 12, 2015: North Korea announced a new collection of inspirational slogans about improving the economy. Worsening fuel shortages meant that most North Koreans are cold and living in the dark and did not get this news immediately and had to wait until it was their turn to get some electricity to operate their radios (which, legally, can only be used to get state controlled news). It is believed that this news did excite most North Koreans but it is unclear how much of that excitement was increased optimism and how much was greater anger.
February 9, 2015:  For the 18th time South Korea sent a warship (and some naval commandos) to join the anti-piracy patrol off Somalia. These ships serve there for six months. Since South Korea began doing this in 2009 South Korean warships have rescued 31 merchant ships from pirate attack and escorted nearly 12,000 ships through these pirate infested water.
February 8, 2015: North Korea tested a new anti-ship missile which it boasted contained a new and very advanced guidance system. Students of North Korea military tech believe the reality is that the new guidance system in better than earlier ones which were considered barely adequate. The new one is considered more than barely adequate but not something anti-missile defenses on South Korean, Japanese and American warships cannot handle.
February 5, 2015: North Korea has ordered an investigation of the National Police in response to growing public anger at increased demands for bribes from police enforcing the crackdown on economic crimes, attempts leave the country, unsafe construction practices or use foreign cell phones. Some police have gotten greedy and routinely ask for more than the victim can afford to pay. This has led to some very public suicides to protest the actions of the greedy cops. The government has ordered provincial police officials to deal with this problem quickly, or else.
February 4, 2015: The Chinese Defense Minister visited South Korea and openly objected to South Korea installing the American THAAD anti-ballistic missile defense system. South Korea wants this for protection from North Korean missile attack. The Chinese would not come right out and say it but they object mainly because THAAD would also make South Korea less vulnerable to intimidation by Chinese ballistic missiles. South Korea openly refused to comply with the Chinese request and South Korean public opinion became even more enthusiastic about the high tech and very expensive (over $100 million per launcher and associated equipment) THAAD system. China sees South Korea more of an ally of the United States and a potential wartime foe than as an ally in attempts to keep North Korea from doing anything that would cause major economic and diplomatic problems (like starting a war).       

2016: A MAN WITH GOD AND COUNTRY AT HEART - MEET DR. BEN CARSON FOR PRESIDENT


Dr. Ben Carson Explores 2016 Presidential Run


 
  

Dr. Ben Carson is officially exploring the possibility of throwing his hat in the ring as a Republican contendor for the 2016 presidential race.

Carson filed the necessary paperwork with the Federal Election Commission on Monday to create his 2016 exploratory committee, which allows him to begin raising money for a campaign.

He is the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Although he has no prior political experience, Carson became a popular conservative figure after delivering a highly publicized speech at the 2013 National Prayer Breakfast.

He now works as a political commentator for Fox News and has authored six best-selling books published by Zondervan.

Carson is strongly opposed to Obamacare, abortion, political correctness, and same-sex marriage.

"We are racking up a virtually insurmountable debt, stifling our economic potential, and placing our children's future at risk," he said in an e-mail announcing his plans to run.

"At home and abroad, we are silencing honest debate about our challenges, our differences and our culture, all in the name of political correctness."

"I've decided to explore a potential run for the office of president because I believe my values, life experience, and willingness to speak the truth and seek solutions, prepares me well to lead our nation toward more prosperity, security, and freedom for every American," he said..




Patriots STAND Up and DEFY TYRANNY in the Courtroom! VIDEO


March 3, 2015 by gavinseim 




On 01/15/15 a band of patriots STOOD UP to tyranny in our courts!
Please DONATE and help us with expenses!
grant seim jr - douglas county
Grant Seim JR. (my Dad) taking one for liberty and refusing to stand back silent in the face of tyranny.
Ask not, when will people stand. But rather shout, I WILL STAND!
America knows this was happening, but we don’t want to face it. It has never been exposed to the world like this. — Around the nation, Kangaroo Courts are abusing justice. Once people walk through those doors, their rights are regarded as dung and they are silenced in fear of tyrant judges and a system that has nothing to do with justice.
What we see here are 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 14th amendment violations! But what precipitated all the events in this courtroom and the open defiance of the 1st amendment by Douglas County. Why did they only allow approved press to record. Press that went out and reported exactly what the State wanted them to.
“Who Stands With Me?” That’s what my brother Nathan said when he was grabbed by police and dragged out. Simply for being a patriot. It’s time to decide if you will stand! — We were attacked, violated and arrested for defending the Constitution, our right to due process and our right to free speech. And it’s happening all over America behind closed doors. It’s time to take back our courts. It’s time to take back our liberty.
The justice of tyrants is to accuse their victims of the very actions and crimes they have committed! It was a rigged trial of a young man that Douglas County, Washington officials wanted to make an example of. What was his crime? He asked a police officer why he was being stopped! You can see that video here.
Seeing ongoing obstruction from the County, a band of about 20 patriots showed up in support and to make sure the defendant got a fair trial. They started up cameras at the defendants request and sat to watch and support Tell Shasteen.
Patriots keeping the cameras rolling. This is how to face a tyrant.
Then all hell broke loose! READ MORE

Dr. Ben Carson announces his decision to run for President of the United States in 2016



DR. BEN CARSON ANNOUNCES HIS DECISION TO RUN
FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

 
                                     
                            
 
Special 2016 Announcement



 
Yesterday, I filed with the Federal Election Commission the necessary paperwork to formally consider a run for President of the United States in 2016.

Let me tell you why I’m taking this step today, and how you can help.

For many years, I have traveled the country closely studying our politics.  I believe we are on the verge of robbing our children of the American Dream.


We are racking up a virtually insurmountable debt, stifling our economic potential and placing our children’s future at risk.

At home and abroad, we are silencing honest debate about our challenges, our differences and our culture, all in the name of political correctness.

We are ceding more and more power to Washington bureaucrats at the expense of our personal liberty, ignoring the wisdom of our founders who risked their lives to form “a more perfect union.”

Too many of our children are trapped in failing schools and find themselves thrust into a deadly cycle of crime, dependence and despair.

Over the course of thousands of operations as the head of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, I have spent most of my adult life caring for very ill children. As co-founder of the non-profit Carson Scholars Fund, my wife Candy and I have spent years helping children find their own inspiration to reach their full, God-given potential.

In many ways, that is the duty of my generation – to do everything in our power to give the next generation the opportunity to achieve greatness.

I believe that with hard work and determined leadership, greatness is within our grasp. America was founded on the self-evident truth that we as a nation have the right to think big and pursue happiness.

It is this core principle that allowed me, a young boy, raised in Detroit by a single, illiterate but determined mother, to overcome poverty, bad grades, and low self-esteem to become one of the world’s leading physicians.

I’ve decided to explore a potential run for the office of President because I believe my values, life experience, and willingness to speak the truth and seek solutions, prepares me well to lead our nation toward more prosperity, security, and freedom for every American.

As I travel around the country to listen, learn and determine whether or not this is a race I can win,
your financial support during the next two months will be extremely helpful. To make a secure contribution to my exploratory committee now, please go here.

I look forward to working with you, and the rest of our fellow citizens to restore the promise of America.

Thank you, and God Bless America.

Sincerely,

Ben Carson
Ben Carson

http://email.bencarson.com/ct/26092784:25273866712:m:1:800222142:F95D7E46BBFFD01B97B9E67F20C89045:r  
http://email.bencarson.com/ct/26092785:25273866712:m:1:800222142:F95D7E46BBFFD01B97B9E67F20C89045:r  
http://email.bencarson.com/ct/26092786:25273866712:m:1:800222142:F95D7E46BBFFD01B97B9E67F20C89045:r http://email.bencarson.com/ct/26092787:25273866712:m:1:800222142:F95D7E46BBFFD01B97B9E67F20C89045:r http://email.bencarson.com/ct/26092788:25273866712:m:1:800222142:F95D7E46BBFFD01B97B9E67F20C89045:r http://email.bencarson.com/ct/26092789:25273866712:m:1:800222142:F95D7E46BBFFD01B97B9E67F20C89045:r
Make a donation Show your support for Ben on social media


Paid for by the Carson America Exploratory Committee
For more information click here. Update your preferences





How the White House Is Justifying Trying to Ban Certain Ammo Without Congress




Here’s How the White House Is Justifying Trying to Ban Certain Ammo Without Congress

 


The White House on Monday defended the Obama administration’s move to ban certain bullets used in a wildly popular rifle, a proposal that has stirred opposition from Second Amendment advocates and a prominent member of Congress.


The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is considering a ban on M855 ball ammunition, which pro-gun groups have said is among the most popular cartridge used for the AR-15 rifle and is frequently used for sporting purposes like hunting, because of its so-called “armor-piercing” capabilities.


"It would be fair to say, as we are looking at additional ways to protect our brave men and women in law enforcement, and believe that this process is valuable for that reason alone,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told TheBlaze during the press briefing. “This seems to be an area where everyone should agree that if there are armor-piercing bullets that fit into easily concealed weapons, that puts our law enforcement at considerably more risk.”


FILE - In this Wednesday, April 10, 2013 file photo Veetek Witkowski holds a newly assembled AR-15 rifle at the Stag Arms company in New Britain, Conn. The city manager and police chief in Maquoketa, Iowa are working on a new policy that would let officers use their own semi-automatic rifles, such as the AR-15, while on duty. The Dubuque Telegraph Herald reports the city would also set up a loan program to let officers buy rifles. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, File)
AP Photo/Charles Krupa


“So I put this in the category of common-sense steps the government can take to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans, while also making sure that our law enforcement officers who are walking the beat every day can do their jobs just a little more safely,” he continued.


Current law provides exemptions for certain ammunition that could be considered “armor-piercing” bullets – such as the M855 – if the ammunition is primarily used for sporting purposes.


The proposal is open now for public comment at the ATF level.


Gun Owners of America spokesman Erich Pratt called it an attempt to do through executive branch regulation what the White House couldn’t get done in Congress.

“In 2013, the administration lobbied hard to get Congress to ban AR-15s and other similar semi-automatic rifles. But even in a Democrat-controlled Senate, anti-gunners could only muster 40 votes, a clear minority,” Pratt told TheBlaze Monday.


“So the proposed ATF ban on M855 ammo is simply an attempt by the Obama administration to make an end-run around the Congress. After all, if it can ban a common cartridge that is used for the AR-15 rifle, then it can substantially drive up the cost of using the firearm."


Last week, the National Rifle Association and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, drafted a letter to ATF Director B. Todd Jones, saying the regulation being considered “does not comport with the letter or spirit of the law, and will interfere with Second Amendment rights."


“ATF has now rescinded that exemption because repeating handguns that fire the M855 round are commercially available,” the letter said. “Yet this round is amongst the most commonly used in the most popular rifle design in America, the AR-15. Millions upon millions of M855 rounds have been sold and used in the U.S., yet ATF has not even alleged – much less offered evidence – that even one such round has ever been fired from a handgun at a police officer. The idea that Congress intended LEOPA to ban one of the preeminent rifle cartridges in use by Americans for legitimate purposes is preposterous."


The ATF proposal states: “The firearm industry has developed commercially available handguns designed to use conventional rifle ammunition. This ammunition meets the content requirement of the definition, but previously was not classified as ‘armor piercing’ under the statute because there were no handguns that could ‘use’ it.


As a result of the availability of these handguns, however, some conventional rifle ammunition now falls within the statutory definition and is properly classified as ‘armor piercing ammunition,’ despite the fact that the ammunition itself has not changed. Consequently, ammunition manufacturers have requested exemptions for this ammunition.”


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/02/heres-how-the-white-house-is-justifying-trying-to-ban-certain-ammo-without-congress/



FCC - OBAMA ACCUSED OF MEDDLING



Streaming

FCC approves sweeping Internet regulation plan. Obama accused of meddling.

The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday adopted sweeping new regulations sought by President Obama for how Americans use and do business on the Internet, in a party-line vote that is sure to be challenged by the broadband industry.

The commission, following a contentious meeting, voted 3-2 to adopt its so-called net neutrality plan -- a proposal that remained secret in the run-up to the final vote. 
On its surface, the plan is aimed at barring service providers from creating paid "fast lanes" on the Internet, which consumer advocates and Internet companies worry would edge out cash-strapped startups and smaller Internet-based businesses.


Chairman Tom Wheeler said it would ensure an "open, unfettered network."


But the rules, more broadly, would put the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone by classifying it like a public utility, meaning providers like Comcast or Verizon would have to act in the "public interest" when providing a mobile connection to your home or phone.


Republican Commissioner Ajit Pai, who delivered some of the most scathing criticism of the plan Thursday, warned the policy represents a "monumental shift" to "government control of the Internet."


Further, he accused the FCC of bending to the will of Obama, who last fall came out in favor of such a sweeping regulatory plan.


Pai said the FCC was reversing course from past positions for one reason: "President Obama told us to do so."


He warned of a litany of negative consequences, intended or not, from the net neutrality plan. He said it allows rate regulation -- and, ultimately, rates will go up and broadband service will slow.


Pai said that while the plan defers a decision on applying a service fee to Internet bills -- much like is applied to phone bills -- that surely will change.


"The order explicitly opens the door to billions of dollars in new taxes," he said. "Read my lips: More new taxes are coming. It's just a matter of when."


Further, he pointed to slower Internet speeds in Europe, which largely treats the Internet as a public utility in warning that the additional regulation will lead to less investment and slower speeds in the U.S. as well.


"The Internet is not broken. There is no problem for the government to solve," Pai said.


Fellow Republican member Michael O'Rielly called the plan a "monumental and unlawful power grab."


Republican lawmakers, as well, blasted the proposal as an antiquated solution that would hurt, not help, Internet innovation.


"The Obama Administration needs to get beyond its 1930s rotary-telephone mindset and embrace the future," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, said in a statement.


While the broadband industry is expected to sue, Republicans in Congress said they will try to pass legislation scrapping the rules, although it's unlikely that such a bill would be signed into law by Obama.


But Democrats on the commission hailed the plan. To charges that the plan represents a secret scheme to regulate the Internet, Wheeler said: "Nonsense."


He claimed it was no more a plan to regulate the Internet "than the First Amendment is a plan to regulate free speech."


Democratic Commissioner Mignon Clyburn -- despite reports she was seeking last-minute changes in the plan to scale it back -- also voted with Wheeler on Thursday. She said it "strikes the right balance."


At stake, Clyburn said, is the risk of businesses getting preferential treatment over start-ups by getting better Internet speeds, or teachers having to worry about whether students can do research online without websites loading at "dial-up speeds."


Twitter said the new rules were a matter of protecting free expression.


"Safeguarding the historic open architecture of the Internet and the ability for all users to `innovate without permission' is critical to American economic aspirations and our nation's global competitiveness," Twitter wrote in a company blog post this week.


Net neutrality is the idea that websites or videos load at about the same speed. That means you won't be more inclined to watch a particular show on Amazon Prime instead of on Netflix because Amazon has struck a deal with your service provider to load its data faster.


For years, providers mostly agreed not to pick winners and losers among Web traffic because they didn't want to encourage regulators to step in and because they said consumers demanded it. But that started to change around 2005, when YouTube came online and Netflix became increasingly popular.


On-demand video became known as data hogs, and evidence began to surface that some providers were manipulating traffic without telling consumers.


By 2010, the FCC enacted open Internet rules, but the agency's legal approach was eventually struck down. FCC officials would erase the legal ambiguity by no longer classifying the Internet as an "information service" but a "telecommunications service" subject to Title II of the 1934 Communications Act.


That would dramatically expand regulators' power over the industry by requiring providers to act in the public's interest and enabling the FCC to fine companies found to be employing "unreasonable" business practices.


The FCC says it won't apply some sections of Title II, including price controls. That means rates charged to customers for Internet access won't be subject to preapproval, though critics warn of future regulation, but the law allows the government to investigate if consumers complain that costs are unfair. 


The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More on this...

US Gov’t Calls Checkmate on Citizens: Makes Fierce Move to Force Vaccina...


USA PRIVATE CORPORATION  CRIMINAL ROGUE 'GOVERNMENT'  CALLS CHECKMATE ON CITIZENS - MAKES FIERCE MOVE TO FORCE ADULT VACCINATIONS!!






 


VACCINE LIBERATION ARMY  ARMED WITH KNOWLEDGE 

 







Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code


informed consent is a legal requirement, otherwise the proposal is illegal… see : The 10 points are, (all from United States National Institutes of Health).[7]

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons.

The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability or death to the experimental subject.

Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.

Note that complete electronic copies of the Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg [Nuremberg] Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10[8] are available online as are most of the other proceedings from the Nuremberg Trials.[9]



Comments:

1. Hitler required vaccinations. His were not as poison as our USA bad folks, so our evil government will do the same as Hitler only worse. Most evil AMA and Evil FDA are not our protectors. We had clean vaccinations then. Not many were ill until they started all this insanity of adding poisons.
NO FORCED VACCINATIONS ON WELL PEOPLE EVER.
FREEDOM!


2. None of this is legal, and you are stupid if you allow them to inject you with anything.


3. I wish the anti-vaccine spokespersons would just bang their opponent with “Why do you think the neurotoxins in vaccines are safe for infants or anyone for that matter?” That’s all that has to be discussed. There is nothing left since neurotoxin is a poison by definition. Neurotoxins are substances that are poisonous or destructive to nerve tissue. http://www.toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Neurotoxins


4. ALL the vaccines recommended for children contain aluminum neurotoxins which by definition are poisonous. Neurotoxins are substances that are poisonous or destructive to nerve tissue.

This entry was posted in Articles & Breaking News, Eugenocide/Population Control, Government experimentation on the public, Liberty & Freedom Room, Transhumanism, Vaccine Injection Room on by .

http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/2015/03/02/government-moves-on-nationwide-adult-vaccinations/comment-page-1/#comment-976041