- 30 March 2015
- Nottingham
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
THIS IS FULFORD'S REGULAR WEEKLY REPORT
In a sign we are living in historic times, high level insiders have begun claiming that Jesus Christ was a fictitious character and that the Qu’ran was written by Vatican propaganda experts. This is evidence the 2000 year old Roman plan to create a unified, mono-cultural fascist world government is unravelling and that, as a result, ancient secrets are pouring out. The details of the new revelations can be seen at the end of the article.
GARGOYLES ALL OVER THEIR STRUCTURES?
GARGOYLES ON THE MORMON CHURCH??
WHY WOULD A 'CHURCH' THAT PROFESSES TO HONOR JESUS CHRIST AS THE SON OF GOD AND TO BE THEIR LORD AND SAVIOR PUT SATANIC GARGOYLES ALL OVER THEIR STRUCTURES?



Is there any Mormon's that want or care to answer why this is??.....
Do you really think Jesus would allow you to walk with him in one hand, and profess to the world that Satan is in the other hand....are your leaders confused??....Jesus said "I am the way, the truth and the light and NO ONE come to the Father but through me"....
IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THIS GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH GARGOYLES ON MORMON CHURCH..... BY THE WAY I THINK THE CATHOLICS HAVE SOME OF THE SAME PROBLEMS....IDOL WORSHIP...PAGAN!! B.S.
China's new development bank is becoming a massive embarrassment for Obama
China's new development bank is becoming a massive embarrassment for Obama

THIS LOOKS LIKE THE REAL OBOZO...
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
China's new development bank, which was announced just five months ago, is becoming a massive headache for the US.
Try as it might, the US government can't persuade its allies to stop joining the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).
The bank will be a bit like the World Bank, providing loans to developing countries in Asia for infrastructure projects.
Unlike the World Bank, China will hold the reins of the AIIB. The US administration is publicly worried that the institution will not meet high governance standards, but it really seems opposed to the move because it signals a growing Chinese influence in the region and in global politics.
The US has already endured a series of embarrassments over the bank. It might have been expected that some European countries with a cooler relationship with the US would join, which they did. India and Singapore, however, were quick to sign up despite having decent relationships with the US. And several other countries have started joining, leaving the US almost completely isolated in its position.
Britain is one of the US' closest allies, but the government has been pursuing an unashamedly warmer relationship with China for several years and was one of the first countries to say it wanted a role in the AIIB.
The front page of the Financial Times the next day, in which anonymous White House sources attacked the British government for "constant accommodation" of China, might have been intended as a warning to others, but it doesn't seem to have worked.
South Korea has applied, and America's other major allies in the region, Japan and Australia, have been warming to the idea of joining.
Tuesday, however, brought the most embarrassing event of all. Taiwan, which has no formal relationship with mainland China, is a former enemy of China, and basically survived the 20th century with its independence only through assistance from the United States, applied to join the AIIB.
The infrastructure bank isn't going to be a massive boom for the UK economy, or even for nearer nations like Japan, and the US will not retaliate. The point is that the UK is willing to take a very modest improvement in economic and political ties with China in exchange for a small deterioration in ties with the US. Pretty much every country has decided that this is the right move.
The AIIB is a part of the wider "new Silk Road" initiative by China to deepen trade and investment both in the rest of Asia and the wider world. According to Barclays, it could actually be a positive thing for the region's stability:
We believe through the building of interdependent relationships based on shared economic interests, this New Silk Road plan should deepen political linkages, improve mutual understanding and foster long-term stability in the region. The agreement to set up the AIIB by countries that have territorial disputes with China suggests potentially lower geopolitical risks and lower probability for military conflicts, in our view.
But the move goes beyond that — it's a major PR push for China, which the American administration has positioned itself opposite from. So far, that strategy is failing spectacularly for the US.Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/us-allies-joining-asian-infrastructure-investment-bank-aiib-embarrassment-2015-3#ixzz3VzXcIN58
THE OFFICIAL Hot Scots drum line
FIVE HIGH SCHOOL TEENS DECIDE TO ENTER TALENT CONTEST AND WIN!
Nigel, Dylan, Matt , Elias and Jordan (who are NOT Scottish) WIN the Talent Show at Lake Howell High School with this performance they actually put together this week (2011)!
You can tell they are having fun!
:) BTW - the kilts are props only and are worn as they chose to wear them for the TALENT show. They are not Scottish but American; however, I understand the Scottish would gladly welcome their drumming talents joining them!!!!
Why You Should Reduce Your Exposure To Fluoride
Why You Should Reduce Your Exposure To Fluoride
LIVE LONGER AND CLEAR UP YOUR BRAIN FOG.... A GOOD REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER FILTER WILL CLEAR THIS POISON FROM YOUR WATER SUPPLY....
February 28, 2015 | By Dr. Edward F. Group III
Fluoride is commonly added to the water supply, and many have been brainwashed into believing fluoride is necessary for dental health and bone maintenance. However, the exact opposite is true. While evidence exists to show that fluoride may provide some benefit as a topical adjunct, it is by no means meant to be consumed and is definitely not without risks. [1]
How Am I Exposed to Fluoride?
Fluoride is a chemical element naturally present in the environment. During the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s, public health officials began fluoridating drinking water. It’s added to the water supply and dental products like toothpaste and mouth rinse. It’s almost impossible to avoid if you don’t use a water purification device that specifically filters it out.
It’s important to consider all the potential resources that utilize tap water. If you frequently eat at restaurants, it’s a solid bet that their kitchen doesn’t use fluoride-free water. Beverage manufacturers all rely on municipal water systems to produce soda, juice, and smoothies — all of which contain added fluoride. Even coffee from the local coffee shop! When you add these up, you can begin to appreciate the high level of fluoride in the average person’s diet.
Symptoms of Fluoride Exposure
Fluoride exposure can cause a number of symptoms; some minor, some severe. Excess salivation is one indication of overexposure to fluoride. Fluorosis, a condition which impedes the function of the ameloblasts in the mouth, hinders the development of the enamel matrix and is another concern; its most common symptom is yellowing of the teeth. [2] It’s not a problem of “not brushing enough,” and simply cleaning the teeth or performing whitening treatments won’t correct the problem.
Fluoride can cause other, more serious issues as well such as calcification of the pineal gland and can get in the way of the thyroid’s ability to absorb iodine.
How to Avoid Fluoride
Avoiding fluoride is tricky, but can be done with the appropriate measures. First, you need to cut it off at the source. Avoid tap water and avoid products that use it. Invest in a water purification device or system that removes, among other things, fluoride. Second, only purchase natural, fluoride-free toothpastes and mouthwash.
Providing enough dietary iodine to your thyroid can help detoxify fluoride and the other harmful halogens, bromide, and chlorine.
Have you had negative reactions to fluoride exposure? What have you done to remedy the problem? Leave a comment below and share your thoughts and tips with us.
-Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM
References:
- Hellwig E, Lennon AM. Systemic versus topical fluoride. Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):258-62.
- Ismail Al, Hasson H. Fluoride supplements, dental caries and fluorosis: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Nov;139(11):1457-68.
Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and now teaches individuals and practitioners all around the world. He no longer sees patients but solely concentrates on spreading the word of health and wellness to the global community. Under his leadership, Global Healing Center, Inc. has earned recognition as one of the largest alternative, natural and organic health resources on the Internet.
1,000-year-old onion and garlic eye remedy kills MRSA
1,000-year-old onion and garlic eye remedy kills MRSA

A 1,000-year-old treatment for eye infections could hold the key to killing antibiotic-resistant superbugs, experts have said.
Scientists recreated a 9th Century Anglo-Saxon remedy using onion, garlic and part of a cow's stomach.
They were "astonished" to find it almost completely wiped out methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, otherwise known as MRSA.
Their findings will be presented at a national microbiology conference.
The remedy was found in Bald's Leechbook - an old English manuscript containing instructions on various treatments held in the British Library.
Anglo-Saxon expert Dr Christina Lee, from the University of Nottingham, translated the recipe for an "eye salve", which includes garlic, onion or leeks, wine and cow bile.
Experts from the university's microbiology team recreated the remedy and then tested it on large cultures of MRSA.


Analysis
Tom Feilden, science editor Today Programme
The leechbook is one of the earliest examples of what might loosely be called a medical textbook
It seems Anglo-Saxon physicians may actually have practised something pretty close to the modern scientific method, with its emphasis on observation and experimentation.
Bald's Leechbook could hold some important lessons for our modern day battle with anti-microbial resistance.

In each case, they tested the individual ingredients against the bacteria, as well as the remedy and a control solution.
They found the remedy killed up to 90% of MRSA bacteria and believe it is the effect of the recipe rather than one single ingredient.
Dr Freya Harrison said the team thought the eye salve might show a "small amount of antibiotic activity".
"But we were absolutely blown away by just how effective the combination of ingredients was," she said.
Dr Lee said there are many similar medieval books with treatments for what appear to be bacterial infections.
She said this could suggest people were carrying out detailed scientific studies centuries before bacteria were discovered.
The team's findings will be presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for General Microbiology, in Birmingham.

Bald's eye salve

Equal amounts of garlic and another allium (onion or leek), finely chopped and crushed in a mortar for two minutes.
Add 25ml (0.87 fl oz) of English wine - taken from a historic vineyard near Glastonbury.
Dissolve bovine salts in distilled water, add and then keep chilled for nine days at 4C.
The Media is Distracting You from the Crimes of DC Politicians
Sometimes you have to wonder, since we have twenty-four hour news networks, why are they not having investigative reporters digging into the crimes of the current administration? Why do they always find ways to divert attention from where it is needed most? After all, part of the design of the press is to keep government responsible before the people, right?
The Sons of Liberty radio show host Bradlee Dean dealt with this issue at the end of last week. One of the article posted to a conservative outlet was titled, "How to make the most of your alumni network for your job search."
"Are they telling you what's going on in your country?" Dean asked rhetorically. "No, because they don't want you to be awake to what's going on. Because if you actually rise up and respond to their lies and their crimes, guess what? It's all over for them, and, of course, they don't want you to know that."
Dean then went on to elaborate on some of the current things that are taking place in Washington. Among those things is a House Bill that seeks to abolish the Patriot Act, which could rightly be called "The Act of Tyranny." It was passed at 3 in the morning and has done nothing but violate the Constitution and the rights of the citizens of the United States. Those rights that you have, that the federal government sought to take from you via the Patriot Act were protected for you by hundreds of thousands of men who fought, bled and died to do so.

One of those powers that is stolen is the Transportation Security Administration, the TSA. They are a "pretended authority." They are not listed among the authorities granted to the federal government by the people of the united States, just like all the other alphabet agencies, including the ATF.
"While your being violated by your government, this government's dropping the border on the southern borders and the northern borders to let illegals in," Dean said.
Understand that when the orchestrated illegal alien invasion took place last year, the TSA was at the helm of flying illegals across country on US airplanes without any identification. But tell me America, what do you have to do before you get on a plane in America? Have your rights, which are supposed to be protected under the Fourth Amendment violated? You betcha!
But the media doesn't want you to know these things.
Section 215 of the Patriot Act Expires in June
Section 215 of the Patriot Act Expires in June. Is Congress Ready?
All of these sections are concerning, but Section 215 takes the cake. It’s the authority that the NSA, with the FBI’s help, has interpreted to allow the U.S. government to vacuum up the call records of millions of innocent people. It’s also been the focus of most of the NSA reform efforts in Congress over the last year and a half. But if there were ever a time to reform the NSA, it’s now—because a vote for reauthorization, without comprehensive reform of NSA spying, will very clearly be a vote against the Constitution.
NSA Spying is Not a Partisan Issue, and it Must be Dealt With
There have been many legislative efforts to reform the NSA over the last year and a half. But none of them have been successful. Most recently, in December, the Senate failed to move the USA FREEDOM Act forward for a final vote.
What lawmakers said about USA FREEDOM, and what they are saying now, gives us some idea of where we’re headed over the next few months.
One of the most notable “no” votes on USA FREEDOM came from Sen. Rand Paul, who objected to the fact that the bill extended the sunset of Section 215 by two years. Sen. Paul has been a vocal critic of the Patriot Act and NSA spying, and has made it clear that he will vote against reauthorization. The question now is whether he and other Republican critics will be able to push for genuine reform—something essential in a Congress that is now majority Republican in both houses.
And that’s where things get troublesome. The cloture vote on USA FREEDOM was a preview for the kind of anti-reform rhetoric we can expect to hear over the next few months. Some civil liberties advocates thought the bill didn’t go far enough—but the lawmakers who voted against it mostly thought it went too far.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell proclaimed on the Senate floor that “now is not the time to be considering legislation that takes away the exact tools we need to combat ISIL.” Similarly, Sen. Marco Rubio—who is now on record as stating that he thinks Section 215 should never expire— stated “the world is as dangerous as ever, and extremists are being cultivated and recruited right here at home. This legislation would significantly weaken and, in some cases, entirely do away with some of the most important counter-terrorism capabilities at our disposal, which is why I will not support it."
The rhetoric isn't confined to the Senate floor. After a man was arrested for allegedly plotting a D.C. shooting spree, Speaker of the House John Boehner claimed that “we would have never known about this had it not been for the FISA program and our ability to collect information on people who pose an imminent threat,” even though the criminal complaint against the arrestee states that it was a government informant that supplied information about his plans.
Why The Focus on Section 215
Section 215 is an obvious target for reform. As the pro-NSA rhetoric reaches a fever pitch, it’s important to remember that we have little to no evidence that bulk collection of telephone call records under Section 215 has ever stopped a terrorist attack.
In fact, even the administration agrees—it’s not necessary. The White House admitted that the government can accomplish its goals without bulk telephone records collection. What’s more, the President’s Review Board said “the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of section 215 telephony meta-data was not essential to preventing attacks.” And the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board could not identify one time when bulk collection under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act “made a concrete difference in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation.” Similarly, an in-depth analysis of 225 cases of people charged with terrorism found that “the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal.”
If that weren’t enough, Senators with access to classified information have also argued that the program is unnecessary. In an amicus brief in EFF’s case First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. NSA, Sens. Ron Wyden, Mark Udall, and Martin Heinrich stated that, while the administration has claimed that bulk collection is necessary to prevent terrorism, they “have reviewed the bulk-collection program extensively, and none of the claims appears to hold up to scrutiny.”
What’s more, claims that collection of call records is not “that big” of an invasion of privacy are simply untrue. As we point out in our amicus brief in Klayman v. Obama, “The call records collected by the government are not just metadata—they are intimate portraits of the lives of millions of Americans.” In one short-term study of a small sample of call detail information, researchers at Stanford were able to identify one plausible inference of a subject obtaining an abortion; one subject with a heart condition; one with multiple sclerosis; and the owner of a specific brand of firearm.
In fact, former director of the NSA and CIA Michael Hayden recently admitted: “We kill people based on metadata.” And former NSA General Counsel Stu Baker said: “metadata absolutely tells you everything about somebody’s life. If you have enough metadata, you don’t really need content.”
Of course, voting against reauthorization isn’t the ultimate goal when it comes to reforming NSA spying. Congress needs to address myriad problems—perhaps the reason Section 215 isn’t essential is because it is such a small part of the NSA’s huge repertoire.
What Real Reform Looks Like
Congress needs to pass comprehensive reform. EFF has continued to call for legislation that would:
What’s Next?
Even though the Section 215 vote is many months away, it’s important to let Congress know what we’re expecting—a no vote on reauthorization, or any other legislation that allows suspicionless surveillance of millions of innocent people. In the meantime, as new legislation emerges, EFF will fight to ensure that all bad bills die, and push hard for any good bills to advance.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/01/section-215-patriot-act-expires-june-congress-ready
You may have heard that the Patriot Act is set to expire soon. That’s not quite the case. The Patriot Act was a large bill, as were the reauthorizations that followed in 2005 and 2006. Not all of it sunsets. But three provisions do expire on June 1st: Section 215, the "Lone Wolf provision," and the "roving wiretap" provision.

NSA Spying is Not a Partisan Issue, and it Must be Dealt With
There have been many legislative efforts to reform the NSA over the last year and a half. But none of them have been successful. Most recently, in December, the Senate failed to move the USA FREEDOM Act forward for a final vote.
What lawmakers said about USA FREEDOM, and what they are saying now, gives us some idea of where we’re headed over the next few months.
One of the most notable “no” votes on USA FREEDOM came from Sen. Rand Paul, who objected to the fact that the bill extended the sunset of Section 215 by two years. Sen. Paul has been a vocal critic of the Patriot Act and NSA spying, and has made it clear that he will vote against reauthorization. The question now is whether he and other Republican critics will be able to push for genuine reform—something essential in a Congress that is now majority Republican in both houses.
And that’s where things get troublesome. The cloture vote on USA FREEDOM was a preview for the kind of anti-reform rhetoric we can expect to hear over the next few months. Some civil liberties advocates thought the bill didn’t go far enough—but the lawmakers who voted against it mostly thought it went too far.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell proclaimed on the Senate floor that “now is not the time to be considering legislation that takes away the exact tools we need to combat ISIL.” Similarly, Sen. Marco Rubio—who is now on record as stating that he thinks Section 215 should never expire— stated “the world is as dangerous as ever, and extremists are being cultivated and recruited right here at home. This legislation would significantly weaken and, in some cases, entirely do away with some of the most important counter-terrorism capabilities at our disposal, which is why I will not support it."
The rhetoric isn't confined to the Senate floor. After a man was arrested for allegedly plotting a D.C. shooting spree, Speaker of the House John Boehner claimed that “we would have never known about this had it not been for the FISA program and our ability to collect information on people who pose an imminent threat,” even though the criminal complaint against the arrestee states that it was a government informant that supplied information about his plans.
Why The Focus on Section 215
Section 215 is an obvious target for reform. As the pro-NSA rhetoric reaches a fever pitch, it’s important to remember that we have little to no evidence that bulk collection of telephone call records under Section 215 has ever stopped a terrorist attack.
In fact, even the administration agrees—it’s not necessary. The White House admitted that the government can accomplish its goals without bulk telephone records collection. What’s more, the President’s Review Board said “the information contributed to terrorist investigations by the use of section 215 telephony meta-data was not essential to preventing attacks.” And the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board could not identify one time when bulk collection under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act “made a concrete difference in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation.” Similarly, an in-depth analysis of 225 cases of people charged with terrorism found that “the contribution of NSA’s bulk surveillance programs to these cases was minimal.”
If that weren’t enough, Senators with access to classified information have also argued that the program is unnecessary. In an amicus brief in EFF’s case First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. NSA, Sens. Ron Wyden, Mark Udall, and Martin Heinrich stated that, while the administration has claimed that bulk collection is necessary to prevent terrorism, they “have reviewed the bulk-collection program extensively, and none of the claims appears to hold up to scrutiny.”
What’s more, claims that collection of call records is not “that big” of an invasion of privacy are simply untrue. As we point out in our amicus brief in Klayman v. Obama, “The call records collected by the government are not just metadata—they are intimate portraits of the lives of millions of Americans.” In one short-term study of a small sample of call detail information, researchers at Stanford were able to identify one plausible inference of a subject obtaining an abortion; one subject with a heart condition; one with multiple sclerosis; and the owner of a specific brand of firearm.
In fact, former director of the NSA and CIA Michael Hayden recently admitted: “We kill people based on metadata.” And former NSA General Counsel Stu Baker said: “metadata absolutely tells you everything about somebody’s life. If you have enough metadata, you don’t really need content.”
Of course, voting against reauthorization isn’t the ultimate goal when it comes to reforming NSA spying. Congress needs to address myriad problems—perhaps the reason Section 215 isn’t essential is because it is such a small part of the NSA’s huge repertoire.
What Real Reform Looks Like
Congress needs to pass comprehensive reform. EFF has continued to call for legislation that would:
- End untargeted, bulk collection;
- End illegal, warrantless "backdoor" searches of Americans' communications collected under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act;
- Provide Americans a clear path to assert legal standing to sue the government for privacy abuses;
- Reform the FISA Court by making significant opinions public and putting a special advocate for privacy in the court;
- Shorten the FISA Amendments Act sunset;
- Enhance the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board powers;
- Ban the NSA from undermining commonly used encryption standards;
- Strengthen privacy protections for innocent people inside and outside of the United States; and
- Fix the broken “classified information” system.
What’s Next?
Even though the Section 215 vote is many months away, it’s important to let Congress know what we’re expecting—a no vote on reauthorization, or any other legislation that allows suspicionless surveillance of millions of innocent people. In the meantime, as new legislation emerges, EFF will fight to ensure that all bad bills die, and push hard for any good bills to advance.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/01/section-215-patriot-act-expires-june-congress-ready
To all the readers of nesaranews
In regards to all postings on nesaranews~
To those readers who criticize what is posted
I congradulate you for having and showing intelligence! The majority ofthe population will believe anything put in front of them. I feel good that a few are questioning what they read. I would feel better if most or all readers questioned everything put in front of them. That shows America is not as full of dumbed down ignorant people as I thought it was.
We here at nesaranews do not sensor the news, that is entirely up to the reader to discern the postings. I suggest making good opinions and not bashing the publishers for the content. I always felt better seeing both sides of the coin. We don't create the news, we only centralize it.
~Freewill
To those readers who criticize what is posted
I congradulate you for having and showing intelligence! The majority ofthe population will believe anything put in front of them. I feel good that a few are questioning what they read. I would feel better if most or all readers questioned everything put in front of them. That shows America is not as full of dumbed down ignorant people as I thought it was.
We here at nesaranews do not sensor the news, that is entirely up to the reader to discern the postings. I suggest making good opinions and not bashing the publishers for the content. I always felt better seeing both sides of the coin. We don't create the news, we only centralize it.
~Freewill
Unbelievable Sign Near Dearborn, Michigan
Truly unbelievable in the U.S.…….
Wake up America !
Unbelievable Sign Near Dearborn, Michigan
Are there "no-go" zones in the U.S.?
Is this one of them?
Dearborn, Michigan is the first city to become
completely Muslim.
Yours may be next because they are here
and more come every day.
Amazing that any city would allow
something like this to be displayed.
FOOLS are put in to public offices
EVERY DAY.
|
University Officials in Florida authorize Pro-ISIS Club!!!!
Barry University Officials in Florida authorize Pro-ISIS Club: "JUST CHANGE THE NAME"!!

University and college campuses are critical weapons in the left’s arsenal to destroy America. It’s not just the obvious horror of ISIS or CAIR or the MSA being welcome on college campuses. It’s that voices who oppose their savagery and carnage are banned. My colleagues and I are rarely invited to speak, and when we are, the blowback is deafening, even violent. Ayaan Hirsi Ali was uninvited from Brandeis, if you recall. It’s not just terror groups and hate preachers welcomed on US college campuses; Jewish students are routinely harassed and bullied on campus by Muslims and their leftist lapdogs.
Following a similar shocking video at Cornell University released by James O’Keefe last week, Barry University officials in Florida also sanction a pro-ISIS club with the stated goal of sending material support to ISIS. The only suggestion by Barry officials was to change the name of the club “because technically our country is at war with ISIS.”

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)