From: Carol Bundy - Update on Nevada Resource Rights - Our Visit to the Capitol

Friends, 

Thank you for everyone who has supported up to this time (especially those that took that 12.5 hour bus ride from Arizona). We have had great success and feel that AB408 has a good chance of going to the floor. We had a great showing for the rally and the hearing was standing room only with the overflow rooms standing room only as well. There was more media at the hearing than many could ever remember being at a hearing before. It was a success in every way in getting the word out.  

Here is a link to a media interview:  http://www.ktvn.com/story/28677558/cliven-bundy-supporters-rally-before-nevada-lawmakers#.VRtDbSn4siE.gmail

Our lands and resources are being locked up by the federal government, they can not be trusted to manage these lands. Their intent is to remove the users from the land including the general public. Once the users are no longer able to benefit from the land they will not fight for it and these agencies will be able to fully claim it for their own benefit. They will be able to control the resources and therefore control the people. Call me a radicle, but I believe this is the number one concern in America today. If we lose the use of the resources then we lose the power to live without permission from someone else.

We still need support FOR the Nevada Resources Rights Bill.  As you can see in the image the "against" crowd has rallied many against us, this is crucial that we let the legislature know that we are serious NOW.  It does not matter where you live, you can support this bill.

 

• Go this link to show support for the bill: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Opinions/78th2015/A/   

select bill number AB408, select FOR

and put in your name and address. This is the official website for the Nevada Legislature and legislators use it to determine public support. If you are a citizen of Nevada it is a bonus, but it does not matter where you live, we need the support of all the States around us including those out east. Please click on the link and fill in the form to show your support for the bill. 

Thank you for everything you have done and are doing. 

Ammon Bundy 

"Act or be acted upon"

P.S. You can Watch the News Coverage video by clicking this image.

ISA - 9/11 LIVE VIDEOS >> circa2015 - PUBLIC RELEASE << Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta

Smoking Gun Proof Holographic Planes Used on 9/11 – Left Wing Disappears Before Plane Hits Building!

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/03/smoking-gun-proof-holographic-planes-used-on-911-cockpit-disappears-into-thin-air-after-going-through-building-3115708.html

Large Hadron Collider set to restart

Graph showing that, as of today, all LHC magnets have completed their training to reach the target currents for beams at 6.5 TeV. The coloured symbols represent each of the LHC's 8 sectors; x axis is time in days (Image: CERN)

After a shutdown lasting two years, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world’s biggest and most powerful particle accelerator, is ready once again for the arrival of particle beams. The teams are completing the final tests after having solved on 31 March the problem that had been delaying the restart of the accelerator. The first beams could be circulating in the machine sometime between Saturday and Monday.
“We are confident of being able to restart the machine over the weekend, as all of the tests performed so far have been successful,” said Frédérick Bordry, Director for Accelerators and Technology at CERN.
When the LHC and the whole accelerator chain are running, operators work in shifts around the clock in the control room. They will attempt to circulate beams in the LHC in both directions, at their injection energy of 450 GeV, as soon as all the lights are green.
Particle collisions at an energy of 13 TeV could start as early as June.

 http://home.web.cern.ch/about/updates/2015/04/large-hadron-collider-set-restart

Ohio Judge: There Will Be No Mentioning Of The Constitution

Ohio Judge: There Will Be No Mentioning Of The Constitution Here

Today in a pre-trial hearing, an Ohio judge casually agreed with a motion filed by a prosecutor asking to ban a defendant from bringing up the United States Constitution or the constitutionality of the law under which he is charged with a crime.

Judge Catherine Barber (or Kathryn Barber), a retired judge filling in for the Xenia Municipal Judge Michael Murray stated “there will be no mentioning of the Constitution” and then laughed when the defendant claimed that uttering words on a public sidewalk constitutes free speech. (The audio of the hearing can be found here: http://bambuser.com/v/5372976).  This was in response to a suggestion from the prosecutor that bringing up the constitution and civil rights “will confuse the jury.”

About a month ago, Virgil Vaduva, a journalist and editor of The Greene County Herald purposefully stood in front of the Xenia police station in an attempt to raise awareness about the constitutionality of the city’s anti-panhandling law.

Vaduva recorded a video of his encounters with local people, many choosing to make a donation to a local charity in town as a result of his actions.  Vaduva was cited by the Xenia police for “panhandling” which is a fourth degree misdemeanor.

The City of Xenia is known for questionable or outright criminal activities committed by city employees.  Former city prosecutor Craig W. Saunders was permanently disbarred by the Ohio Supreme Court after stealing more than $40,000 from an estate entrusted to be managed by him.  Two city council members also are currently under fire for conflict of interest after investing into a business venture in which they voted on as council members.  The current city prosecutor, Ronald Lewis was charged with tax evasion in late 2014. All the charges against him were dismissed after he claimed that he “forgot” to file and that it was “an honest mistake.”  The city judge ordered all evidence to be struck from the record.

As a result of his “panhandling” Vaduva raised about $42 which was donated to a local charity helping the homeless and those in need.

A jury trial for Vaduva is scheduled for March 26th at 8:30 AM at the Xenia Municipal Court.

Panhandling in Xenia, Ohio from Greene County Herald on Vimeo.

Of course they don't honor and uphold the Constitution. They are not bound to as they are not a real government. When they act under the 14th Amendment § 3,4,5, then they fall under the Constitution and that is only for 12 hours during their election time. After that 12 hours, they step out of the 14th Amendment and back to being a bankrupt corporation for profit. These so called judges and court staff are only actors hired by a bankrupt private company for profit called UNITED STATES a.k.a.VIRGINIA COMPANY and it's franchise states. They do not fall under the control of the constitution no more than the local 7-11 owned by towelheads! All these actors have sworn an oath to the crown and are agents of Britain. The only powers they actually have in America is under article 55 at the Hague as an occupying army in probate only (world of the dead). This is why they created the straw-man a.k.a. your name in ALL CAPS. They have no jurisdiction over the living unless you consent via contracts known as licenses, birth certificates, voter registrations, and Social Security numbers etc. 

Look at these Supreme Court cases for example:

S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54

Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People
– Supreme Court of the United States 1795

"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of
the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary,
having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity
with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any
law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate,
artificial persons and the contracts between them."
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
[--Not the "United States Supreme Court" –ed.]

CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70 "Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent"

Now, what you can use in your defense against these foreign actors called judges and their revenue generating, racketeering, ponzi scheme courts for profit is the 1933 bankruptcy. Only a bankruptcy court appointed trustee can speak on the behalf of a bankrupt corporation. With all the research I have done, I have yet to find a single prosecutor who is a trustee of the 1933 bankruptcy. None of them can speak on the behalf of the UNITED STATES, Franchise STATE OF XXXXXXX, and any state licensed business. Therefore there is no plaintiff present in court ever! Every case is to be dismissed due to no plaintiff, or no jurisdiction. You people really need to learn this stuff and stop aiding and abetting the enemy (B.A.R.) association a.k.a. occupying British army that we defeated in war more than once. Don't let them win this way of concurring America.

By the way, who gave them permission to come ashore? Where are their yellow cards with their shot records? Where are their green cards to be able to temporarily reside here and work?

 ~Freewill

Truck Hits Utility Pole, Thousands of People’s Smart Meters Explode

NOW, DO WE HAVE A CASE AGAINST THEM?

GOOD THING WE DON'T HAVE A "SMART GRID"  OR DO WE ????

ISN'T IT "PAST TIME" THEY REMOVE THEM AND REPLACE THEM WITH OUR OLD METERS? 

WHAT'S TO SAY THAT ALL THE OTHER "SMART APPLIANCES" WON'T DO THE SAME THING?

LIVES ARE AT RISK HERE... FROM THE FIRES AND HEALTH ISSUES FROM BEING CLOSE TO

A VERY "DUMB" SMART METER !! IT'S "PAST TIME" TO MAKE A STAND.. SO MAKE IT "NOW" !!

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Truck Hits Utility Pole,

Thousands of People’s

Smart Meters Explode

Melissa Melton
Activist Post

No, this is not an April Fool’s joke.

Perhaps smart meters aren’t the safest, nor the “smartest” idea to put on people’s homes after all.

Despite the fact that these meters have been known to burst into flames from time-to-time, and aside from the fact that they continuously expose occupants to electromagnetic radiation, and despite the fact that they can be used to continually collect data on everyone who lives in a home (the newer versions can send signals from individual outlets in a home every 15 seconds to be later broken down with disaggregation algorithms)… now this.

A truck crashed into a utility pole in Stockton a few days ago, causing a power surge that ultimately resulted in some 5,000 smart meters on people’s homes exploding, leaving all of them without power.

The explosions began around 8:30 in the morning. Via CBS:

When the customers in more than 5,000 homes get their power back on will depend on how badly damaged their meters are.

Neighbors in the South Stockton area described it as a large pop, a bomb going off, and strong enough to shake a house.

“The neighbor across the street, his meter doesn’t look as bad but his receptacles are all blackened.” said Brad Abernathy.

PG&E says a dump truck crashed near its Alpine substation on Arch Road. When the truck hit the utility pole, the top wire fell onto the bottom wire, creating a power surge.

So now, instead of just having to worry about continual data collection and surveillance, or the negative health effects of electromagnetic frequency exposure, or the potential for a random house fire, there’s also the possibility of a truck randomly hitting a pole and causing your smart meter to straight up explode, also damaging your home and leaving you and yours without power for at least a week, maybe longer until it can be replaced… to possibly happen all over again?

How “smart” is this smart grid again?


Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple, where this article first appeared, and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!

Nurse faces felony charges after 'driving half a mile to lighted parking lot before stopping for cop who pulled her over on dark rural road'

• DelRea Good of Portage, Indiana was charged with resisting arrest after she drove to a 'safe and well-lit area' before pulling over
• Porter County Sheriff's Department Patrolman William Marshall arrested Good because she was 'uncooperative' 
• Marshall allegedly also accused her of having a controlled substance that turned out to be Advil 

A nurse, 52, who was driving by herself on a dark country road faces felony charges after she didn't immediately pull over for a cop because she didn't think it was a safe place to stop.

DelRea Good of Portage, Indiana says that on March 23 she was charged with resisting arrest because she hit the brakes for Porter County Sheriff's Department Patrolman William Marshall about a half a mile down the road from where he asked her to halt her vehicle.

Good was speeding and was driving at 54 mph in a 35 mph zone at 11:21 p.m.

+4

Charged with resisting arrest: Portage resident DelRea Good said she did not immediately pull over for the flashing lights behind her because, as a 52-year-old woman traveling alone at night on a dark county road

'I felt I didn't do anything wrong,' Good told NWI.com.

'I got to a safe place and I told him that.'

Good says that when she was ordered to pull over, she put on her emergency flashers, and waved her hand out the window to let the cop know that she was aware of his presence and that she planned to stop.

She finally turned off the gas at a well-lit Kohls parking lot.  

Good said Marshall was enraged with her when she pulled over and said, 'What in the hell are you doing? I could arrest you for this.'

Good has no previous criminal record and says that if she is convicted of a felony then she will lose her job.

Marshall claims that Good was 'highly agitated and uncooperative' and said she told him, 'I don't care who you are I don't have to stop on a county road, I'm a single female.'

+4

No criminal history: DelRea Good is a nurse with no criminal history and says that is she is convicted that her job will be in jeopardy 

Marshall arrested Good after she 'failed to listen to how speeding endangers other drivers.'

'I follow rules every day or people could get hurt,' Good said in reference to her nursing career. 

'This could be your mom, your sister, your daughter next time.'

Good even accuses the cop of bullying her on the way to the station and says he accused her of having a controlled substance, which turned out be be Advil.

Good's attorney Bob Harper has argued that his client's concerns are absolutely warranted.

Harper brought up a 1991 case in which a woman pulled over for a man pretending to be a cop who later attacked her.

+4

New motto: Good has decided to promote female safety by painting this on the back of her car and by assigning herself the hashtag #femalesafetymatters

+4

Rough arrest: Good posted this photo on her Facebook showing the alleged bruises she got during the arrest

Harper then said that two years prior, Portage police issued a warning say that a man impersonating a police officer by flashing red and blue lights tried to get a woman to pull over.

Portage Police Sgt. Keith Hughes said that the woman who refused to stop a few years ago exercised good judgement.

He recommended that drivers call 911 if they expect someone is impersonating a cop and said if they are unable to get through to anyone they should wave to the officer them stop at a well lit area.

Porter County Sheriff's spokesman Sgt. Larry LaFlower said after the current incident that 'The sheriff's office supports our officer's decision in this matter.'

Good has been posting to her Facebook following the incident and decided to assign herself the hashtag  #femalesafetymatters.

She wrote that her lawyer is representing her free of charge because 'he feels this is a travesty of justice.'

Good also posted a picture of bruises on her arm from the arrest and claimed that the officer was too rough with her.  

Speaking out: Good said her lawyer decided to represent her free of charge because he feels her arrest was a 'travesty of justice'

REP. BLACKBURN RIPS FCC INTERNET TAKEOVER: IF IT AIN’T BROKE DON’T FIX IT

REP. BLACKBURN RIPS FCC INTERNET TAKEOVER: "IF IT AIN’T BROKE DON’T FIX IT!"

AP Photo/CBS News, Chris Usher

by ALEX SWOYER1 Apr 2015Washington, DC155

Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee is firing back at President Obama for his Federal Communications Commission (FCC) led internet takeover–which the administration bills as “net neutrality” and critics call “net neutering”–saying it can lead to censorship. Still Democrats are backing the President, saying his policies mean equal access for all.

The FCC responded to President Obama’s push for Net-Neutrality to regulate the internet with a 3-2 vote over objections from some Republicans. According to Blackburn’s office, the courts have previously rejected the FCC’s attempts to regulate the internet.

Net neutrality supporters say the regulations will increase investment in internet based services. The rules prohibit broadband providers from blocking or regulating internet traffic in a selective manner.

According to the Tennessee Republican, there is no need for the FCC to be preceding internet service providers because the internet has worked effectively for decades.

“The internet is not broken, it does not need the intervention of the FCC,” Blackburn said.

“What this in essence does is to give the federal government the right to determine priority and value to content – so they’re ultimately going to be able to censor everything that you have.” Blackburn added. “We don’t need this. It will run up costs and lead to new regulations and new taxes,”

But Democratic Representatives Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) disagree with Blackburn.

Van Hollen said he supports President Obama’s objectives for an open internet.

“As the interest develops, if the President doesn’t adopt the policies he has proposed, you would actually slow down easy access to all content on the internet,” he said.

“In fact what the president wants to do is make sure that we do not move into a system where people who pay more get faster easier access to content – we want to make sure we have content neutrality here and net neutrality,” Van Hollen added.

Schiff also said he is a strong supporter of what President Obama is doing.

“I’m a strong supporter of net neutrality – I think it would be a real set back economically for us if we have a situation for us where the ISPs can create fast and slow lanes,” said Schiff.

Schiff said he wants to keep the free market on the internet in place.

Blackburn is continuing her push to stop the Obama Administration’s efforts to regulate the Internet through Net Neutrality regulations. She reintroduced her Internet Freedom Act on March 3, 2015, which would halt the FCC’s Net-Neutrality rules.

On March 12, 2015, the FCC released its order publically.

“I reiterate my disappointment in the lack of transparency that accompanied this process,” read Blackburn’s response to the order.

New Pro-Gun Rights Amendment Could "Shut Down Parts of the United Nations"!

By Tim Brown / 2 April 2015

Several gun owner rights victories have occurred recently in the united States Senate, including a vote that shut down the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

Among those victories is Senator Jim Inhofe's amendment, which Gun Owners of America claims has the potential to shut down parts of the United Nations if they stay on course with the ATT.

First, Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) added a committee amendment to deal with Obama's DOJ and their anti-gun Operation Choke Point. As a result, the bill wasn't even taken out on the floor of the senate. Well done, Senator Crapo.

As you recall, Operation Choke Point was a huge overreach of federal powers by the usual criminal, Attorney General Eric Holder, which sought to strong arm gun businesses and other businesses the Justice Department deemed "risky" business, in order to put pressure on banks to sever ties with gun dealers.

Also, Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK) was able to put in an amendment to shut down the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The vote was 59-41.

Gun Owners of America said that the amendment that Inhofe put forward was "so far-reaching that it has been accused, probably correctly, of potentially shutting down parts of the United Nations if that organization continues to push the ATT."

Inhofe's Amendment 649 reads as follows:

SEC. ___. SPENDING-NEUTRAL RESERVE FUND RELATING TO PROHIBITING FUNDING OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS ARMS TRADE TREATY PRIOR TO SENATE RATIFICATION AND ADOPTION OF IMPLEMENTING LEGISLATION. 

The Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may revise the allocations of a committee or committees, aggregates, and other appropriate levels in this resolution for one or more bills, joint resolutions, amendments, amendments between the Houses, motions, or conference reports relating to funding, which may include prohibiting funding for the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty Secretariat or any international organizations created to support the implementation of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty prior to Senate ratification and adoption of implementing legislation by the amounts provided in such legislation for those purposes, provided that such legislation would not raise new revenue and would not increase the deficit over either the period of the total of fiscal years 2016 through 2020 or the period of the total of fiscal years 2016 through 2025.

"Senator Moran and I have shown time and again that the Senate will not ratify the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty. Today, the Senate also spoke against taxpayer dollars being used to help fund the treaty's implementation," Inhofe said. "The President should remove the United States' as a signatory nation on an ambiguous treaty, which does nothing to guarantee the protection of personal gun ownership and could potentially interfere with the United States' ability to aid allies."


GOA legislative counsel Michael Hammond spoke to Freedom Outpost and explained that the Inhofe amendment would defund particular portions of the UN related to the ATT.


"This amendment would clearly defund the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty Secretariat or any international within the UN or outside the UN, which has been deemed to have been created to support the implementation of the ATT," said Hammond. "I take that to mean in whole or in part."


Hammond said that this is at the very least a "placemark" as to defunding anything in the UN that would advance the ATT. This is a good thing as the United Nations is the vehicle by which American tax dollars are being used, under the guise of helping the world, to bring in communism on a global scale.


Of course, over 130 congressmen said that they opposed the ATT in 2013, but more importantly, the senate has already passed a resolution informing Barack Obama that they would not ratify it. As such, the treaty remains null and void, according to the US Constitution.

The treaty also poses many dangers to undermining America's sovereignty and the Second Amendment, including a national gun registration.


The senate failed to fight off eight anti-gun amendments put forward by Democrat Senators Chuck Schumer (NY), Dick Durbin (IL), Chris Murphy (CT) and Richard Blumenthal (CT), which, according to Gun Owners of America, "dealt with fraudulent non-issues like guns and domestic violence, guns and sex trafficking, and so forth."


Additionally, Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) introduced legislation that would repeal Washington, DC's gun ban.

According to GOA, "The Rubio/Jordan bill (S. 874/H.R. 1701) would repeal Washington's gun license requirement.  It would repeal the semi-auto ban and the microstamping requirement, and would turn D.C. into a "shall-issue" jurisdiction -- an achievement which, while it wouldn't be a big deal in pro-gun parts of the country, is a huge deal in this cesspool of anti-gun liberalism."


"In order to achieve the American Dream, people need to be able to live in safe communities and be able to protect themselves, their families and their properties from danger," Rubio said. "For years, the District of Columbia has infringed on its residents' Second Amendment rights and rendered them vulnerable to criminals who could care less what the gun laws are."


Jordan echoed Rubio's comments adding that the bill would "restore the original intent of the Second Amendment to our nation's capital."


Well, the bill will have to go a lot further to restore the "original intent of the Second Amendment." It's going to have to go way beyond guns to include any and all arms as I've written about before.


However, at least there are some victories that move us in the right direction. For that, I am thankful.

http://eaglerising.com/16813/new-pro-gun-rights-amendment-could-shut-down-parts-of-the-united-nations/ 

What Would Happen If Martial Law Was Declared In America?

         
What Would Happen If Martial Law Was Declared In America?


Michael SnyderEnd Of The American Dream
April 2, 2015


In recent weeks, there has been a lot of concern that an upcoming eight week military exercise on U.S. soil known as “Jade Helm” is actually a dress rehearsal for the imposition of martial law in this country.


One of the reasons for the high level of concern is that we have seen a dramatic increase in the number of “urban warfare exercises” conducted by the U.S. military in major U.S. cities over the past decade – including exercises where “dissidents” are hunted down, arrested and hauled away. 


As our world becomes increasingly unstable, and as our society rapidly decays from within, many believe that it is only a matter of time before the executive branch will have sufficient excuse to use the extensive martial law powers that it has been accumulating since 9/11. 


When that day arrives, what will our nation look like?  What would actually happen if martial law was declared in America?


Well, the first thing that you need to know is that the U.S. Constitution would be “suspended”.


In other words, you would suddenly have no rights at all.
There would be no freedom of speech, no freedom of the press, no freedom of assembly and you could be arrested at any time for any reason whatsoever.


For the duration of the “emergency”, the military would be in control.  There would be troops in the streets, a curfew would almost certainly be imposed, and armed checkpoints would be set up.


If the “emergency” lasted long enough, we would probably see authorities go house to house confiscating firearms, ammunition and food supplies.


And perhaps most troubling of all, “dissidents” and “subversives” would likely be rounded up and imprisoned.


Perhaps you don’t think that this could ever happen in the United States in 2015.


Well, we do know that this is precisely what the FBI had a plan to do in the 1950s.  The following is an excerpt from a recent RT article…

Documents show the FBI created a “Plan C” during the Cold War, which could have been triggered in the event the US underwent a nuclear attack. It included putting the nation under martial law, rounding up “subversives,” and interning enemy diplomats. 

The documents, acquired by transparency journalism organization MuckRock, detail the FBI plan created in 1956, which was shared with several top officials from every governmental department. The FBI also distributed papers regarding the plan to its field offices. The plan would have gone into effect “after a war has begun in which the US is involved or may become involved and prior to an actual attack on the US itself,” according to the documents. 

Under Plan C, martial law would be declared and the FBI would enact its ‘Emergency Detention Program,’ which entailed apprehending individuals whose affiliations with subversive organizations “are so pronounced that their continued liberty in the event of a national emergency would present a serious threat to the internal security of the country.” The document shows that as of April 1956, almost 13,000 people “were scheduled for apprehension in an emergency.”

Very sobering.


And we do know that the federal government had a list of at least 8 million names of people that were considered to be “threats to national security” back in the 1980s.  This list was known as Main Core, and it is not known whether this list still exists today.


I have a feeling that it does, and that it is probably much larger than it was back then.


We also know that government documents produced during the Obama administration openly discuss rounding up “dissidents” and taking them to internment camps.  Just consider the following example from Infowars…

A leaked 2012 US Army Military Police training manual, entitled “Civil Disturbance Operations,” described how soldiers would be ordered to confiscate firearms and kill American “dissidents.” The manual also revealed that prisoners would be detained in temporary internment camps and “re-educated” to gain a new appreciation of “U.S. policies,” in accordance with U.S. Army FM 3-19.40 Internment/Resettlement Operations.

So who would those “dissidents” be exactly?
In “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“, I detailed how official U.S. government documents specifically identify those that believe in “conspiracy theories” as possible threats. 


Others that the government is concerned about include those opposed to abortion, globalism, communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations and “the New World Order”.


I wish that none of this was true.  Go check out the article for yourself.


Another very disturbing government document talks about the need for the U.S. Army to prepare to battle political dissidents in “megacities” and to neutralize groups “who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state”.  Here is more from Infowars…

The U.S. Army is preparing to fight political dissidents who challenge the power of the state as “megacities” become the battleground of the future, according to a new report in the Army Times. 

The article details how the Army’s Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) worked with US Army Special Operations Command, the chief of staff’s Strategic Studies Group and the UK’s Ministry of Defence earlier this year to wargame the future of armed combat, which will revolve around the neutralization of groups “who can influence the lives of the population while undermining the authority of the state,” a chillingly vague description which could easily be applied to political dissidents. 

The plan foresees an unprecedented realignment of U.S. military strategy focused around putting “boots on the ground” in megacities to deal with “politically dispossessed” populations while relying on “more lethal and more autonomous” methods.

Very alarming stuff.


And if we did see martial law declared nationwide, it is likely that all elections would be suspended indefinitely.
That could also potentially include the 2016 presidential election.


Is it possible that Barack Obama could use his emergency powers to stay in the White House beyond his second term?  There are some out there that believe that this could actually happen under the right circumstances. 


For example, check out what Dr. Ben Carson said during an appearance on the Alan Colmes radio show…

COLMES: What do you mean though when you say there may not be an election in 2016? 

DR. BEN CARSON: There may be so much anarchy going on. 

COLMES: Anarchy? So you really think we risk risking an anarchic America to the point where elections might be put on hold, or some kind of emergency is declared with such anarchy that there wouldn’t be a Presidential election in a couple of years? 

DR. BEN CARSON: I don’t want to find out. I really don’t want to find out, I don’t want to continue down this pathway that we’re going down.

And the groundwork has certainly been laid for such a scenario.


During his time in the White House, Barack Obama has signed a series of executive orders that give him and his minions an extraordinary amount of power in the event of a major national emergency.


For example, read the following excerpt from an executive order that Obama signedin March 2012…

Sec. 201.  Priorities and Allocations Authorities.  (a)  The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:
(1)  the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;
(2)  the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;
(3)  the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;
(4)  the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;
(5)  the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and
(6)  the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

That sounds like it covers just about everything.
Basically, during a time of martial law all of the things that you take for granted today would be out the window.
You would have no rights, and the federal government would be able to do just about anything that it wanted to do.


If that sounds really bad to you, then maybe now you are starting to understand why so many people get upset when they see preparations being made for the eventual imposition of martial law in this country.

Related posts:

1. Alex Jones On Coast to Coast: The Exploding States’ Rights Movement & Martial Law
2. The Infowars Flu Pandemic Resource
3. Preparing for Civil Unrest in America
4. BATTLEFIELD USA: De Facto State of Martial Law Declared In Boston *Pics From the War Zone*
5. “Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?” by David Ray Griffin

This article was posted: Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 5:26 am

http://www.prisonplanet.com/what-would-happen-if-martial-law-was-declared-in-america.html