Monday, July 20, 2015

a Lord Of The Rings-type world

Ancient  humans  'rampantly  interbred' with  Neanderthals  and  a  mystery  species  in  Lord  Of  The  Rings - style  world  of  different  creatures

  • Genome analysis of Neanderthal and human-like group called Denisovans
  • It reveals ancient bedfellows may have included 'mystery human ancestor'
  • Has been likened to Lord Of The Rings world of creatures which interbred

Ancient humans rampantly indulged in interspecies sex in a Lord Of The Rings-type world of different  human groups, new DNA analysis has revealed.

And our ancient bedfellows appear to have included a 'mystery human ancestor', which has not yet been identified.
Genome analysis from a Neanderthal and another group of ancient humans, the Denisovans, was presented to a meeting of the Royal Society in London, and it included 'snippets' of  the mystery DNA  - neither human nor Neanderthal.

It suggests that interbreeding was rampant and more widespread between the human-like groups living in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago than previously thought, scientists say. 


Neanderthal groups (skull, pictured) are believed to have been small and relatively isolated, which meant a natural emotional focus on close internal relationships
Neanderthal groups (skull, pictured) are believed to have been small and relatively isolated, which meant a natural emotional focus on close internal relationships

The findings come from fresh analysis of DNA from a Denisovan, a hominin discovered after the finding of bone and teeth remains in a Siberian cave, and published in Nature.
The new study of the genomes was carried out by David Reich of Harvard Medical School.
He said: 'Denisovans appear more distinct from modern humans than Neanderthals.
He added: 'Denisovans harbour ancestry from an unknown archaic population, unrelated to Neanderthals', New Scientist reports.

Mark Thomas, an evolutionary geneticist at University College London who was present at the presentation, said: 'What it begins to suggest is that we're looking at a Lord Of The Rings-type world - that there were many hominid populations.'

It comes after ancient viruses inherited from Neanderthals were found in modern human DNA.
Scientists are investigating possible links between the 'endogenous retroviruses', which are hardwired into DNA, and modern diseases such as AIDs and cancer.

Researchers compared DNA from Neanderthals and Denisovans with that obtained from cancer patients.
They found evidence of Neanderthal and Denisovan viruses in the modern DNA, suggesting that they originated in a common ancestor more than half a million years ago.

Neanderthals co-existed with our ancestors in Europe for thousands of years, but belonged to a different human sub-species. They eventually became extinct around 30,000 years ago.

Around 8% of human DNA is made up of endogenous retroviruses, or ERVs, which are DNA sequences left by viruses which pass from generation to generation.
They form part of the 90 per cent of the genome, some times called 'junk' DNA, that contains no instruction codes for making proteins. 


The analysis included 'snippets' of  the mystery DNA  - neither human nor Neanderthal


The analysis included 'snippets' of the mystery DNA - neither human nor Neanderthal.

Dr Gkikas Magiorkinis, from Oxford University’s Department of Zoology, who co-led the research, said: 'I wouldn’t write it off as ‘junk’ just because we don’t know what it does yet.
'Under certain circumstances, two ‘junk’ viruses can combine to cause disease. We’ve seen this many times in animals already. ERVs have been shown to cause cancer when activated by bacteria in mice with weakened immune systems.'

The Oxford team now plans to look for possible links between these ancient viruses, belonging to the HML2 virus family, and cancer and HIV/Aids.
'How HIV patients respond to HML2 is related to how fast a patient will progress to Aids, so there is clearly a connection there,' said Dr Magiorkinis.

'HIV patients are also at much higher risk of developing cancer, for reasons that are poorly understood. It is possible that some of the risk factors are genetic, and may be shared with HML2.
'They also become reactivated in cancer and HIV infection, so might prove useful as a therapy target in the future.'

Co-author Dr Robert Belshaw, from the University of Plymouth, said: 'Using modern DNA sequencing of 300 patients, we should be able to see how widespread these viruses are in the modern population.
'We would expect viruses with no negative effects to have spread throughout most of the modern population, as there would be no evolutionary pressure against it.
'If we find that these viruses are less common than expected, this may indicate that the viruses have been inactivated by chance or that they increase mortality, for example through increased cancer risk.'

The study, published in the journal Current Biology, was funded by the Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council.

DID THE NEANDERTHALS GIVE MODERN MAN LANGUAGE, TOO?

Our modern language can be traced back to Neanderthals living half a million years ago, scientists have claimed.
Research increasingly seems to indicate that our close cousins, the Neanderthals, were much more similar to us than imagined.
Dutch researchers argue that the last common ancestor we shared with the Neanderthals around half a million years ago, shared speech and language with modern humans.
They believe that the origins of our modern language are ten times older than previously thought.

The scientists at the Max Planck Institute in the Netherlands are interested in the implications for understanding present day linguistic diversity.
Popular opinion is that they spoke in primitive grunts, but Neanderthal man successfully inhabited vast swathes of western Eurasia for several hundreds of thousands of years, during harsh ages and milder interglacial periods.

Psycholinguistics researchers Dan Dediuand Stephen Levinson said that far from being slow brutes, their cognitive capacities and culture were comparable to ours.
The duo, who have looked at past findings in detail, argue that essentially modern language and speech are an ancient feature of our lineage dating back at least to the most recent ancestor we shared with the Neanderthals and the Denisovans (another form of humanity known mostly from their genome).
Their interpretation of scarce evidence contradicts a popular scenario believed by most language scientists who think our modern language began with a sudden emergence of modernity presumably due to one or a few genetic mutations that gave rise to language.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2510219/Ancient-humans-rampantly-interbred-Neanderthals-mystery-species-Lord-Of-The-Rings-style-word-different-creatures.html


Retired General Wesley Clark Calls for Interning “Disloyal” Americans in Camps!!!!!!!

RETIRED  GENERAL  WESLEY  CLARK   CALLS   FOR   INTERNING   'DISLOYAL'   AMERICANS   IN   CAMPS!!! 
WHAT SAY YOU, AMERICA, TO THIS GENERAL?

A LETTER FROM 'WE THE PEOPLE' OF THESE UNITED STATES

TO GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: 

GENERAL, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS YOUR DEFINITION OF A 'DISLOYAL  AMERICAN'?  

THE TRUE DEFINITION OF ONE WHO IS 'DISLOYAL' IS:   

- the offense of attempting, by overt acts, to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family; 

- one who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty; 

- one who commits treason

IS YOUR DEFINITION OF A 'DISLOYAL AMERICAN' ONE WHO EXPOSES THE ACTIONS OF AND WHO DEFENDS THIS NATION FROM ITS ENEMIES WITHIN AND WITHOUT - INCLUDING A ROGUE 'GOVERNMENT', ROGUE FINANCIAL, JUDICIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL CORPORATIONS, AND A ROGUE USA CORPORATION MILITARY?

DOES YOUR DEFINITION OF A 'DISLOYAL AMERICAN' INCLUDE A TRUE LOYAL AMERICAN WHICH EXCLUDES THE TRAITOROUS NWO / UN / ILLUMINATI/ NAZI / COMMUNISTS / PROGRESSIVES WHO ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO DESTROY THIS NATION AND ITS PEOPLE?

GENERAL, ARE YOU NOW PUBLICLY EXPOSING THAT YOU ARE A SELF-DECLARED TRAITOR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THE NATION YOU SWORE AN OATH TO DEFEND?  

GENERAL, WHAT IS YOUR DEFINITION?

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHERE YOU STAND - DEFENDER? OR DESTROYER OF AMERICA AND HER PEOPLE?

GENERAL, DID YOU NOT SWEAR AN OATH WHEN YOU ACCEPTED YOUR COMMISSION TO SERVE THIS NATION AND HER PEOPLE? 

Oath of Commissioned Officers

I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

*****************************************

July 19 2015 
Retired US Army General and the former Supreme Allied Commander of Europe for NATO Wesley Clark advocates rounding up “radicalized” and “disloyal” Americans and putting them in internment camps for the “duration” of "the war on terror".
“In World War II if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech.  We put him in a camp.  They were prisoners of war,” Clark told MSNBC.

The difference is that World War II was a war declared under Article I, Section 8, Clause II of the Constitution whereas "the war on terror" is undeclared and thus illegal.  ("THE WAR ON TERROR" IS A WORKING PHRASE TO MEAN WHATEVER THE ENEMIES WITHIN THIS NATION WANT IT TO MEAN FOR ANY PURPOSE AT ANY TIME AGAINST GOOD SOLID AMERICANS WHO FULLY RECOGNIZE THE TREASON, LOSS OF THEIR RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, AND WHO SPEAK OUT ABOUT IT AND WORK TO CORRECT THE SITUATION.  THE USE OF THE PHRASE INCLUDES MILITARY AND OTHER CORPORATIONS MAKING MILLIONS - TRILLIONS OFF OF "THE WAR ON TERROR' VIA MANUFACTURE OF WAR GOODS AND SERVICES - IN SHORT A MONEY MAKER FOR ALL HIRED TO PERFORM THE TRAITOROUS ACTIVITIES FOR THE ROGUE ADMINISTRATION UNLAWFULLY DECLARING THIS 'WAR ON TERROR.' THE REAL TERRORISTS ARE THE ONES DECLARING THIS WAR FOR THEIR OWN PURPOSES.)


Clark is, in essence, advocating a life sentence for people who have not committed a crime but merely engaged in speech — often reprehensible, yet constitutionally protected — the 'government' considers 'radical' and in opposition to its treasonous foreign and domestic policies. 


The Bush administration declared the war on terror would last a generation or more. Senior officials with the Obama administration meanwhile have said — when formulating “disposition matrix” to determine how terrorism suspects will be disposed of — they had reached a “broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade” or more.

The Edward Snowden “leaks reveal that the war on terror at home continues to grind on, capturing in its dragnet millions of Americans and foreigners, many of them innocent of any crime. The war on terror has become institutionalized, and the domestic costs of this war continue to mount: privacy is being eroded; communications are being monitored; and dissent is being cracked down on.  

The primary targets of the domestic war on terror continue to be Muslims and Arabs, though it is now clear that the sweep of the domestic war has ensnared millions of other Americans. And there is no end in sight to this domestic juggernaut,” writes Alex Kane.

Clark’s remarks reveal the mindset of the upper echelon of 'government'. Those who disagree with the 'government' are now to be rounded up and shut up indefinitely in political internment camps.

Mass internment of official enemies on par with Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union is now “on the table” and openly discussed as suspicious attacks and FBI orchestrated and grandstanded terror plots continue to grab headlines and build a reactionary consensus as the designed result of an incessant, decades-long propaganda campaign.

http://www.infowars.com/wesley-clark-calls-for-interning-disloyal-americans/




Sunday, July 19, 2015

Obama Makes Disturbing Statement About Children


OBAMA MAKES DISTURBING STATEMENT ABOUT CHILDREN AFTER SICK PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S VIDEO GOES VIRAL

 

Thursday, July 16th, 2015

 

Americans all across the country, and of a variety of political persuasions, were absolutely horrified when an undercover video was released showing a senior Planned Parenthood official casually talking about selling aborted baby parts.

While this disgusting revelation no doubt had some fence-sitters rethinking their stance on abortion, the dedicated progressives who worship at the altar of dead babies have been busy defending Planned Parenthood’s indefensible actions.

'President' Barack Obama, seemingly oblivious to the nauseating travesty that had been revealed, posted a message to Twitter regarding opportunity for children.

Obama tweet children

Obama’s tweet read, “We recognize that every child deserves opportunity. Not just some. Not just our own.” (H/T WZ)

Presumably Obama wasn’t referencing the ghoulish activities taking place at Planned Parenthood, an organization he wholly supports.  Rather, he was most likely referring to his unconstitutional executive actions granting amnesty to illegal immigrants, which have also come under increasing fire recently.

Sadly, while Obama is demanding our nation provide opportunity for children who have entered the country illegally, he has made no such demands for the stolen opportunities of unborn children.

Lest we forget, Obama once asked God to “bless” Planned Parenthood, setting them on high as an organization favored by his administration and insinuating that they are doing good work.

It is time for Congress to act swiftly to completely deprive the baby killers at Planned Parenthood of all taxpayer funds, forcing them to conduct their evil work on their own without government support.

Hopefully, our nation will soon be blessed with a pro-life president who will work to limit abortions to an explicitly specific few circumstances and time frames, at the very least.

http://conservativetribune.com/obama-planned-parenthood/?utm_source=Mailchimp&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=featured-stories&utm_campaign=DailyEmail07.17.15

Susan Rice Just Openly Admitted Obama’s TREASON

 

BREAKING: 

SUSAN RICE JUST

OPENLY ADMITTED

        

OBAMA'S TREASON!

 

Thursday, July 16th, 2015 


Asked about the consequences of lifting sanctions against the terror-supporting nation of Iran, National Security Advisor Susan Rice uttered a single sentence that laid her boss’ entire plan on the table for everyone to see:

“We should expect that some portion of that money would go to the Iranian military and could potentially be used for the kinds of bad behavior that we have seen in the region up until now,she said.

That “bad behavior” that we should expect the Iranians to continue to fund, of course, includes acting as a huge state sponsor of radical Islamic terror in Iraq, Yemen, Palestine and elsewhere.

Which goes to show you that Team Obama can’t bring themselves to utter the phrase “Islamic terrorism” even when that’s precisely what they’re talking about.

Sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran are slated to be dropped as part of the deal regarding its nuclear program that it has been negotiating with Secretary of State John Kerry and representatives of other nations.

But not to worry because Iran cannot use the money against Americans and American interests right away, Rice said.

“Our best judgment is, first of all, it’s going to take them quite a while to access that money,” she told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday. “And it will take — they won’t be able to get it all at once.”

Well, that’s relief! We have at least until a week from Friday, or whenever, to continue to enjoy our lives. Phew.

Once the nation meets the terms of the agreement, including the reduction of operating centrifuges for example, and submits to international inspections Iran will see its cash flow improve dramatically.

“And then, at that point, the sanctions will be suspended,” Rice explained. “And Iran will begin to be able to access its frozen accounts around the world.”

Rice also detailed the administration’s expectation — although it might be better described as a “hope” — that the Iranian government will choose to spend that money on its economy to improve the country’s morale.

But, of course, it would be unrealistic to assume all the money would be used to that end.

“But yes, it is real, it is possible and, in fact, we should expect that some portion of that money would go to the Iranian military and could potentially be used for the kinds of bad behavior that we have seen in the region up until now,” she admitted (H/T Breitbart).

“Expect,” she said. Increased funding for radical Islamic terror was the expectation of the Obama administration, and yet they signed off on this deal anyway.

What else needs be said?

STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES.
A TRAITOR IS A TRAITOR IS A TRAITOR AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED IMMEDIATELY AS SUCH.

http://conservativetribune.com/1-shocking-sentence-susan-rice/?utm_source=Mailchimp&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=featured-stories&utm_campaign=DailyEmail07.17.15

WHAT REALLY IS THE MATRIX - the movie you didn´t see

Spain Government Goes Full Police State

 

SPAIN'S GOVERNMENT GOES FULL POLICE STATE 

ENACTS LAW FORBIDDING DISSENT AND 'UNAUTHORIZED' PHOTOGRAPHY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT

 

STATUTES HAVE ARISEN FROM SPAIN'S POSITION AS A FLASHPOINT FOR ANTI-AUSTERITY PROTESTS 

 

Spain Government Goes Full Police State; Enacts Law
                Forbidding Dissent, 'Unauthorized' Photography Of Law
                Enforcement
by Tim Cushing | Techdirt | July 9, 2015

Well, Spain’s officially a police state now. On July 1st, its much-protested “gag” law went into effect, instantly making criminals of those protesting the new law. Among the many new repressive stipulations is a €30,000-€600,000 fine for “unauthorized protests,” which can be combined for maximum effect with a €600-€300,000 fine for “disrupting public events.”
This horrible set of statutes has arisen from Spain’s position as a flashpoint for anti-austerity protests, the European precursor to the Occupy Wall Street movement. Fines, fines and more fines await anyone who refuses to treat authority with the respect it’s forcibly requiring citizens to show it.

The law also extends its anti-protest punishments to social media, where users can face similar fines for doing nothing more than encouraging or organizing a protest. Failing to present ID when commanded is another fine. And then there’s this:
Showing a “lack of respect” to those in uniform or failing to assist security forces in the prevention of public disturbances could result in an individual fine of between €600 and €30,000.
Spain’s legislators thought of everything. To ensure these crackdowns on protests go off with a minimum of public backlash, “respected” police officers are being given a blank check to use as much force as they feel necessary when breaking up “unauthorized protests.” The law doesn’t directly instruct police to behave badly, but it does provide a very helpful increase in opacity.
A clause in the wide-ranging legislation that critics have dubbed the “gag law” provides for fines of up to 30,000 euros ($33,000) for “unauthorized use” of images of working police that could identify them, endanger their security or hinder them from doing their jobs.
Somehow, the Spanish government has managed to find an expectation of privacy within its public spaces and applied it to its public servants. While the law does make some provision for the public’s “right to know,” it also defers to law enforcement’s judgment when it comes to what is or isn’t “authorized use” of photographs/video depicting police performing their public duties. 


Obviously, this small nod towards the public’s rights is completely insincere. The government wants to clamp down on protests and it obviously can’t be embarrassed by award-winning photographs/video of its police officers beating civilians wholly uninvolved with the protests that so angried up the cops’ blood.
Those defending the law (sort of) think the built-in “protections” will at least protect some favored members of the media.
Victora Lerena, president of Spain’s association representing visual journalists, thinks the language about freedom of information will protect journalists, but predicts anyone who tries to take images of police at protests without media organization credentials could be at risk.
This is likely true, considering the “credentialed” press already blurs officers’ faces when reporting. But the most damning images of police misconduct usually come from unofficial sources, and even the most aggressive of mainstream news outlets frequently defer to the government’s judgment when reporting on alleged police abuse.
Spain has outlawed dissent and given the police extra protections and respect they haven’t earned. That’s as close to a police state as you can get without actually declaring martial law. 

http://www.infowars.com/spain-government-goes-full-police-state-enacts-law-forbidding-dissent-unauthorized-photography-of-law-enforcement/
 

Here's why Obama and Hillary must stop Donald Trump at all costs

Subject: Here's why Obama and Hillary must stop Donald Trump at all costs

"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."

This was reciently shared with me and looked worth getting out there. 
It may be this country's only chance to come back since he doesn't whore himself out like
all the other polititians and judges.

this should really be distributed far and wide.


 




 

It's going to take MONEY to stop all the Criminals Running OUR Country, Here is the only guy that has it and can do it!

Here’s why Obama and Hillary must stop Donald Trump at all costs.
Posted on July 9, 2015 by Wayne Allyn Root (Note: Wayne Allyn Root was audited by the Obama IRS in 2011). 
Hi. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Some people are getting very nervous: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, Eric Holder, Hillary Clinton and Jon Corzine, to name just a few. And I know why.
I wrote a book titled “The Murder of the Middle Class” about the unholy conspiracy between big government, big business and big media. They all benefit by the billions of dollars from this partnership, and it’s in all of their interests to protect one another. It’s one for all and all for one.

It’s a heck of a filthy relationship that makes everyone filthy rich — everyone except the American people. We get ripped off. We’re the patsies.
But for once, the powerful socialist cabal and the corrupt crony capitalists are scared. I’ve never seen them this outraged, this vicious, this motivated or this coordinated. Never in all my years in politics have I seen anything like the way the mad dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.
When white supremacist David Dukes ran for governor of Louisiana, even he wasn’t treated with this kind of outrage, vitriol and disrespect. When a known fraud, scam artist and tax cheat like Al Sharpton ran for president, I never saw anything remotely close to this. The over-the-top reaction to Trump by politicians of both parties, the media and the biggest corporations of America has been so swift and insanely angry that it suggests they are all threatened and frightened like never before.
Why? Duke was never going to win. Sharpton was never going to win. Ron Paul was never going to win. Ross Perot was never going to win as a third-party candidate. Those candidates either didn’t have or couldn’t spare the billion dollars it takes to win the presidency. But Donald Trump can self-fund that amount tomorrow and still have another billion left over to pour into the last two-week stretch run before Election Day.
No matter how much they say to the contrary, the media, business and political elite understand that Trump is no joke. He could actually win and upset their nice cozy apple cart.
It’s no coincidence that everyone has gotten together to destroy The Donald. No, this is a coordinated conspiracy led by President Barack Obama himself. Obama himself is making the phone calls and giving the orders; he’s the ultimate intimidator who plays by the rules of Chicago thug politics.
Why is this so important to Obama? It’s because most of the other politicians are part of the “old boys club.” They talk big, but in the end they won’t change a thing. Why? They are all beholden to big-money donors. They are all owned by lobbyists, unions, lawyers, gigantic environmental organizations and multinational corporations like Big Pharma or Big Oil. Or they are owned lock, stock and barrel by foreigners like George Soros owns Obama or foreign governments own Hillary with their Clinton Foundation donations.
These run-of-the-mill establishment politicians are all puppets owned by big money. But there’s one man — and only one man — who isn’t beholden to anyone. There’s one man who doesn’t need foreigners, or foreign governments, or George Soros, or the United Auto Workers, or the teachers union, or the Service Employees International Union, or the bar association to fund his campaign.
Billionaire tycoon and maverick Donald Trump doesn’t need anyone’s help.
That means he doesn’t care what the media says. He doesn’t care what the corporate elites think. That makes him very dangerous to the entrenched interests. That makes Trump a huge threat. Trump can ruin everything for the bribed politicians and their spoiled slave masters.
Don’t you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama? Don’t you wonder why John Boehner and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama? Don’t you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to defund Obamacare or Obama’s clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens? Bizarre, right? It defies logic, right?

Well, first, I’d guess many key Republicans are being bribed. Secondly, I believe many key Republicans are being blackmailed. Whether they are having affairs, or secretly gay, or stealing taxpayer money, the National Security Agency knows everything.

Ask former House Speaker Dennis Hastert about that. The government even knew he was withdrawing large sums of his own money from his own bank account. Trust me: The NSA, the SEC, the IRS and all the other three-letter government agencies are watching every Republican political leader. They know everything.

Thirdly, many Republicans are petrified of being called “racists.” So they are scared to ever criticize Obama or call out his crimes, let alone demand his impeachment.

Fourth, why rock the boat? After defeat or retirement, if you’re a “good boy,” you’ve got a $5 million-per-year lobbying job waiting.
The big-money interests have the system gamed. Win or lose, they win.

But Trump doesn’t play by any of these rules. Trump breaks up this nice, cozy relationship between big government, big media and big business. All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the presidency. The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides — but not Trump.

Remember: Trump is the guy who publicly questioned Obama’s birth certificate. He questioned Obama’s college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university.

Now, he’s doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do. He’s questioning our relationship with Mexico; questioning why the border is wide open; questioning why no wall has been built across the border; questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes yet are not deported; and questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.

Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick. Good question.
I’m certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare website.
By the way, that tab is now up to $5 billion.

Trump will ask if Obamacare’s architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. He will ask if Obama himself committed fraud when he said, “If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it.”
Trump will investigate Obama’s widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama’s college records.
Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election.
How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?

Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop this. They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask, Trump could wake a sleeping giant.

Trump’s election would be a nightmare. Obama has committed many crimes. No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute. He will not hesitate. Once Trump gets in and gets a look at “the cooked books” and Obama’s records, the game is over. The gig is up. The goose is cooked.
Holder could wind up in prison. Jarrett could wind up in prison. Obama bundler Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money.

Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails, or for accepting bribes from foreign governments while secretary of state, or for“misplacing” $6 billion as the head of the State Department, or for lying about Benghazi.
The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison. Obamacare will be defunded and dismantled. The Obama crime family will be prosecuted for crimes against the American people. And Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters.
Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved — just for fun. That will all happen on Trump’s first day in the White House.
Who knows what Trump will do on Day 2?
That’s why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump. I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. See you next week. God bless America.

Obama collecting personal data for a secret race database

A key part of President Obama’s legacy will be the fed’s unprecedented collection of sensitive data on Americans by race. The government is prying into our most personal information at the most local levels, all for the purpose of “racial and economic justice.”
Unbeknown to most Americans, Obama’s racial bean counters are furiously mining data on their health, home loans, credit cards, places of work, neighborhoods, even how their kids are disciplined in school — all to document “inequalities” between minorities and whites.
This Orwellian-style stockpile of statistics includes a vast and permanent network of discrimination databases, which Obama already is using to make “disparate impact” cases against: banks that don’t make enough prime loans to minorities; schools that suspend too many blacks; cities that don’t offer enough Section 8 and other low-income housing for minorities; and employers who turn down African-Americans for jobs due to criminal backgrounds.
Big Brother Barack wants the databases operational before he leaves office, and much of the data in them will be posted online.
So civil-rights attorneys and urban activist groups will be able to exploit them to show patterns of “racial disparities” and “segregation,” even if no other evidence of discrimination exists.
Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history.

Housing database

The granddaddy of them all is the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing database, which the Department of Housing and Urban Development rolled out earlier this month to racially balance the nation, ZIP code by ZIP code. It will map every US neighborhood by four racial groups — white, Asian, black or African-American, and Hispanic/Latino — and publish “geospatial data” pinpointing racial imbalances.
The agency proposes using nonwhite populations of 50% or higher as the threshold for classifying segregated areas.
Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs, and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites.
HUD plans to drill down to an even more granular level, detailing the proximity of black residents to transportation sites, good schools, parks and even supermarkets. If the agency’s social engineers rule the distance between blacks and these suburban “amenities” is too far, municipalities must find ways to close the gap or forfeit federal grant money and face possible lawsuits for housing discrimination.
Civil-rights groups will have access to the agency’s sophisticated mapping software, and will participate in city plans to re-engineer neighborhoods under new community outreach requirements.
“By opening this data to everybody, everyone in a community can weigh in,” Obama said. “If you want affordable housing nearby, now you’ll have the data you need to make your case.”

Mortgage database

Meanwhile, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, headed by former Congressional Black Caucus leader Mel Watt, is building its own database for racially balancing home loans. The so-called National Mortgage Database Project will compile 16 years of lending data, broken down by race, and hold everything from individual credit scores and employment records.
Mortgage contracts won’t be the only financial records vacuumed up by the database. According to federal documents, the repository will include “all credit lines,” from credit cards to student loans to car loans — anything reported to credit bureaus. This is even more information than the IRS collects.
The FHFA will also pry into your personal assets and debts and whether you have any bankruptcies. The agency even wants to know the square footage and lot size of your home, as well as your interest rate.
FHFA will share the info with Obama’s brainchild, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which acts more like a civil-rights agency, aggressively investigating lenders for racial bias.
The FHFA has offered no clear explanation as to why the government wants to sweep up so much sensitive information on Americans, other than stating it’s for “research” and “policymaking.”
However, CFPB Director Richard Cordray was more forthcoming, explaining in a recent talk to the radical California-based Greenlining Institute: “We will be better able to identify possible discriminatory lending patterns.”

Credit database

CFPB is separately amassing a database to monitor ordinary citizens’ credit-card transactions. It hopes to vacuum up some 900 million credit-card accounts — all sorted by race — representing roughly 85% of the US credit-card market. Why? To sniff out “disparities” in interest rates, charge-offs and collections.

Employment database

CFPB also just finalized a rule requiring all regulated banks to report data on minority hiring to an Office of Minority and Women Inclusion. It will collect reams of employment data, broken down by race, to police diversity on Wall Street as part of yet another fishing expedition.

School database

Through its mandatory Civil Rights Data Collection project, the Education Department is gathering information on student suspensions and expulsions, by race, from every public school district in the country. Districts that show disparities in discipline will be targeted for reform.
Those that don’t comply will be punished. Several already have been forced to revise their discipline policies, which has led to violent disruptions in classrooms.
Obama’s educrats want to know how many blacks versus whites are enrolled in gifted-and-talented and advanced placement classes.
Schools that show blacks and Latinos under-enrolled in such curricula, to an undefined “statistically significant degree,” could open themselves up to investigation and lawsuits by the department’s Civil Rights Office.
Count on a flood of private lawsuits to piggyback federal discrimination claims, as civil-rights lawyers use the new federal discipline data in their legal strategies against the supposedly racist US school system.
Even if no one has complained about discrimination, even if there is no other evidence of racism, the numbers themselves will “prove” that things are unfair.
Such databases have never before existed. Obama is presiding over the largest consolidation of personal data in US history. He is creating a diversity police state where government race cops and civil-rights lawyers will micromanage demographic outcomes in virtually every aspect of society.
The first black president, quite brilliantly, has built a quasi-reparations infrastructure perpetually fed by racial data that will outlast his administration.
Paul Sperry is a Hoover Institution media fellow and author of “The Great American Bank Robbery,” which exposes the racial politics behind the mortgage bust.

 http://nypost.com/2015/07/18/obama-has-been-collecting-personal-data-for-a-secret-race-database/

Chattanooga Shootings Show We’re Up to Our Necks in It

ScreenHunter_03 Jul. 17 15.02
Any questions? –Michael Ball/Twitter
“And they could have done what if armed? It was a drive-by shooting,” a comment poster at The War on Guns wrote as a response to  the “No Guns” sign on a Chattanooga armed forces recruiting center.
The statement reflected either ignorance or intentional trolling.  Of course no one can predict the outcome of a hypothetical—but that doesn’t mean it’s preferable to remove self-defense choices from potential targets. And Dean Weingarten at Gun Watch makes a compelling case that “there was significant time for the Marines to defend themselves, if they had been allowed defensive weapons.”
The antis have no rebuttal to the fact that men who were trained but intentionally unequipped were slain, and that it took armed men to stop the killer. Besides, such absurd objections are only made to mask the true gun-grabber goal: universal “gun free” zones.
It is curious how there’s no national outrage being ginned up by “progressives,” from Obama on down, over the immigrant killer’s Islamist tie-ins that’s comparable to the all-out ideological “cleansing” they’re trying to impose following the South Carolina church shootings. It’s curious; it’s just not particularly surprising, when you realize another goal is cultural terraforming, by hook or by crook, and if that doesn’t work, by force.
“Disobey posted death zones and understand that jihadi fourth generation warfare means we are all at war — everywhere, all the time,” Mike Vanderboegh cautions readers at Sipsey Street Irregulars. “The Jihadis have determined that they are in a global war with us, all of us — our families, our friends, the innocent, wherever we live and whatever we do. We cannot opt out of it because they will not let us.”
“[Y]our bystanding days are over!” Vanderboegh quotes Gregory Peck’s Captain Mallory character from The Guns of Navarone. “You’re in it now, up to your neck!”
“’Gun-free zones’ are nothing but death zones for the innocent,” Vanderboegh explains. “As an American at war, whether you chose to enlist in that war, you’re in it, up to your neck. You MUST disobey such posted death zone signs just as you wouldn’t enter camp gates unarmed with that other big collectivist lie of history posted on them – ‘Arbeit Macht Frei.’”
As an Oath Keeper at war, you’re in it up to your neck, too. Only you can decide if complying with or enforcing such zones invokes orders you’ll obey.
As a bit of late-breaking unverified information, a poster claiming to be a sergeant with the Chattanooga Police Department left a comment on SSI further claiming one of the Marines was armed in violation of policy “and fired at the cowardly bastard who then retreated behind the facility. There he began firing on the others.” With the understanding that this could just be anonymous disinformation, I will do what I can to reach out and corroborate or debunk this claim.

NOTE FROM STEWART:
Here we go again.  Just as with the soldiers at Ft. Hood, these Marines died unarmed, with no chance to return fire against their killer, directly as a result of a perverse, idiotic policy that mandates that even our military warriors must go unarmed under this “Commander in Chief.”   This is the same “Commander in Chief” who required soldiers and Marines to be disarmed even in Iraq or Afghanistan whenever he or one of his minions (such as his Secretary of Defense) came in for a photo-op with the troops.   No troops were allowed in the tent, or anywhere near them, unless first disarmed.    And this is the same “Commander in Chief” who made sure Marines marching in DC had their bolts removed from their M1 Garand rifles (clearly, he doesn’t trust them to be armed around him).
No American, in service or out, should ever be disarmed, and no American should ever go unarmed.   As I said in my message on July 4, 2015:
Anyone who is trained and competent with their weapons should have a rifle and a rifle bag or chest rig with sufficient loaded magazines in their vehicle, at the least, and also a pistol on their person, at all times. But not just this weekend, and not just because of any particular threat – because that is our standing duty, day in, day out, 24/7 and 365 days a year. We the People are the true first responders. That’s how we should all be, all the time.
….
You should all be armed, ready, willing, and able to defend liberty anywhere, anytime, against any threat, because that is what it means to be a free people, and that is what it means to be Americans.
.
As Robert A. Heinlein put it so well:
“The price of freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness.”
GO ARMED.  Screw their stupid, unlawful orders, edicts, and pretend legislation.  Go armed, at all times, as free men and women, and be ready to do sudden battle, anywhere, anytime, and with utter recklessness.    That IS the price of freedom.
I am in Idaho, attending an excellent class on SHTF Intelligence by Sam Culper of Forward Observer Magazine.   On the drive over, here is what was next to me:
AkandSneakybag
That is in the vehicle, and my Glock and spare magazines are on my person, at all times.   Go armed.  Be ready to be the “first responder” anytime, anywhere, and send any attacker straight to hell.
And step up and stand guard at the recruiting offices, if that is what it take to make sure they are not defenseless while they are STILL under threat of being punished under the UCMJ for merely doing what they are trained to do.   That is what our Arkansas Chapter is doing.   The Arkansas Chapter President, Rick Moon (a Special Forces veteran),  launched “Operation Protect the Protectors” at 13:00 hours yesterday afternoon, and our members there are guarding recruiting offices.  I urge all Oath Keepers, in all states, to do the same.
For the Republic,
Stewart Rhodes