This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
On the
twenty-first of May 2015, the Keshe Foundation in its weekly workshop
announced the beginning of setting up the procedure for establishing
the promised WORLD PEACE.
In this
announcement, we explained that the process to achieve global peace
will take shape in the coming months through the work of the Keshe
Foundation and the release of further new knowledge through the
teachings arm of the Foundation, during the daily live-streamed
sessions from its Spaceship Institute in Trani, Italy.
In these
teachings during the past months we have taught, and in the coming
months we shall continue to teach new scientific criteria and systems
that shall open the path for the process of using the new technology
for establishing peace.
We shall
teach step-by-step procedures that start and bring into action what
it takes to achieve the ultimate goal of the Foundation, which is to
facilitate and finally enforce World Peace through applications and
implications of the use of new technology.
In this
paper we are setting the roadmap to achieve this elusive peace
amongst men through the collective effort of the citizens of this
planet, without relying on any government or path of belief.
In this
roadmap, we rely on the total collective efforts of the human race to
develop and deliver the technological knowledge to the world public,
which takes the need for governments out of the equation, eliminating
the need for consent of the present controllers of the human souls.
We totally
rely on the maturity of the Man in understanding what has caused the
problems of the past, and how it can be overcome.
In this
cycle of maturity of Man, we do not depend on any government or
faith, but we take into account that Man has matured enough to take
responsibility for his own destiny, to be living a correct life and
conducting his affairs in line with living in peace amongst other
creatures of God on this planet and in deep space.
Our roadmap
is simple and clear; It has taken millions of years for Man to become
such a destructive being, as man has seen solutions in everything, by
destroying and ending processes, only for him to survive and rule his
world, through acts like eating animals, killing fellow men, ending
cultures, destroying races or paths of belief, and by this method he
has enforced his meager will on defeated entities.
Through the
release of new knowledge we have shown that Man can cover every need
of his existence without destroying another life or harming another
soul, by using and understanding that all forces and energies of the
universe are within his reach and command, if he gathers the
knowledge and intelligence of how to harvest and use them to support
others.
Thus with
the release of this new universal science and technology we have been
and are taking step by step the essence of killing and
destruction out of the RNA and DNA of the Man, that he does not need
to teach his children the mistakes of the past, and hence, for the
first time in the life of this creature of the universe, we can
introduce the process of obtaining, without needing to resort to the
destruction of any other being in the universe.
Even if Man
does not stop this ethos of killing and destruction of the essence of
this creation of the Earth, now that we are opening the doors of
universal science and technology for the Man to travel into deep
space and to join the universal community, Man will understand that
unknowingly or knowingly he cannot take steps to destroy another
being for food or by having false intentions in respect to other
creatures of space, and their reaction to protect themselves from
being consumed or destroyed, and that this action leads to
annihilation of the Man in the open spans of the universe.
In our
teachings, we have shown and taught how to make new elements and free
plasma, which can release enough energy to be sufficient to produce
new materials to satisfy the need for energy and material for man in
space, we have shown how to produce energies which can lead to the
creation of motion in space, without the destruction of other
entities.
The
pitfalls of killing have been apparent to the Man, but he has not
managed to find a way out of this ever-closed maze of need as a
justification for the killings, thus now we need time and new
procedures that will make man understand and take action, and put
into effect the process of de-killing, as killing has been ingrained
in his daily pattern of life for millions of years.
Thus now we
guide Man in how to walk away from the habit of killing. Even though
this shall not be easy, it needs perseverance and understanding, and
a correct path of approach and conduct, and understanding of the
working of the universe, and we are here to teach it all.
It is
better to start with small steps at a time, that all men can
understand and have time to think about the process of peace.
To this
effect we are setting the following roadmap for the coming months,
and if it fails we have our means to enforce the will of the majority
of the race for peaceful co-existence amongst men and other creatures
of the universe.
To start,
we appoint one peace day per month, starting from June 2015, so that
man starts making efforts and thinks about the alternative and
correct path.
So it
follows:
The
first day of peace is appointed to be the 21st of June 2015, and
this day of peace will as well follow on the 21st of July and
August.
In
September, October and November, there will be two days of peace a
month, on the 21st and 22nd of each month.
In
December 2015 and January and February of 2016, we increase the days
of peace to three days a month from the 21st to the 23rd.
From
21st of March of 2016, we increase the days of peace to 7 days a
month, from the 21st to the 27th of each month for the following
three months.
From
21st of June 2016, we increase the peace days to 14 days a month,
again for three months.
From
21st of September 2016, we increase the peace days to 21 days a
month, for three months.
By
21st of December 2016, we ask and shall enforce peace indefinitely
as designated.
Can you find yourself in the picture? Don’t be “that guy”. These people will end up living under a cardboard box or they will forced to go to a FEMA camp for food and water.
Most people, who are familiar with Jade Helm, understand that it will take a precipitating event (e.g. false flag) in order for the “drill” to go live. And most would agree that the precipitating event will be tied to an economic collapse of the dollar. When the collapse comes, order will have to be restored, hence, enter Jade Helm. Once America reaches this point, your money will be gone along with the 401K, Roth IRA and all retirement accounts will be confiscated. Jade Helm, or its successor will be needed.
The Most Requested Subject In the History of The Common Sense Show
Since I wrote the June 12th article “Surviving the Jade Helm Era Depends On Taking Your Money Out of the Bank”, I have been inundated with requests for more information on how to get your money out of the bank. If you think your money is safe while sitting in the bank, you desperately need to read the aforementioned article. Please note, that I am not a financial planner, I am simply informing the public of what I have learned on the topic of federal bank withdrawals and the legalities connected with withdrawing your money from the bank. The following represents what I have either done, or will do, in the coming days.
There is no doubt that anyone who leaves all of their money in the bank needs their head examined. However, if you walk up to your “friendly” teller and ask to withdraw all, or most, of your money, you will either be shown the door and/or arrested for violating federal banking laws. Yes, it is now a crime to take your own money out of your own bank account, just ask former Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert who has been indicted for taking HIS money out of HIS bank account.
Even Congressmen Aren’t Safe From the Banksters
Former Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert, is headed to prison for taking his money out of his own bank account!
Federal prosecutors have charged a former Republican House speaker, Dennis Hastert, with illegally structuring cash withdrawals from bank accounts which were designed to conceal payments to someone he committed “prior misconduct” against and Hastert is also accused of lying to the FBI about the event. The indictment did not specify who Hastert was paying off for his prior misconduct, but anonymous sources allege that Hastert had sexual contact with a minor when he was a high school wrestling coach and the former student was extorting the former Congressman. A total of $3.5 million was involved according to the prosecutors.
The important point to consider here is that this former Congressmen is not headed to prison for sex with a minor, or facilitating a bribe, he is headed to prison for TAKING HIS OWN MONEY OUT OF HIS BANK ACCOUNT!
Just how can one steal their own money, according to the 'Federal Government'? That is what Deborah T. thought when she wrote the following to me on June 13th.
Dear Dave, Please suggest what I should do. I cashed out my $10,000 IRA, paid the taxes and got the $10,000 in CASH….worried about not being able to get my money out of the bank. Now from what I have been hearing I am afraid I could be arrested for getting my own money out… Please make a suggestion. Should I redeposit the $10,000? Forever grateful if you will answer. Deborah T.
Deborah should be concerned with going to prison. There is no question that you need to take the majority of your money out of the bank, but what are the pitfalls in doing so?
What should every American know prior to attempting to liberate the fruits of their own labor from the bankster controlled central bank?
Times Have Changed
Taking what was your money out of the bank is no longer a matter of walking up to your friendly teller with a withdrawal slip and the teller cheerfully honors your request and you calmly exit the bank with your money in tow. In fact, your teller is trained to look for certain indicators in any cash withdrawal of any significance.
As you move to withdraw the bulk of your money, there are three federal banking laws that you should be cognizant of, namely, Cash Transaction Report (CTR), a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) and structuring.
Before proceeding with the planed withdrawal of your money, I would strongly suggest that you read the following federal guidelines as it relates to CTR’s as produced by the The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). All the federal regulations contained in this article are elucidated in this series of federal reports. Before withdrawing your money, please be aware of these three regulations related to getting your money out of the bank.
CTR
Federal law requires that the bank file a report based upon any withdrawal or deposit of $10,000 or more on any single given day.The law was designed to put a damper on money laundering, sophisticated counterfeiting and other federal crimes.
To remain in compliance with the law, financial institutions must obtain personal identification, information about the transaction and the social securitynumber of the person conducting the transaction.
Technically, there is no federal law prohibiting the use of large amounts of cash. However, a CTR must be filed in ALL cases of cash transaction regardless of the reason underlying the transaction. This means your cash transaction will be on the radar.
Structuring and SAR
There will undoubtedly be some geniuses whose math ability will tell them that all they have to do is to withdraw $9,999.99 and the bank and its protector, the 'federal government', will be none the wiser. It is not quite that simple. Here are a few examples of 'structuring violations' that one should be aware of:
1. Barry S. has obtained $15,000 in cash he obtained from selling his truck. He knows that if he deposits $15,000 in cash, his financial institution will be required to file a CTR. Instead he deposits $7,500 in cash in the morning with one financial institution employee and comes back to the financial institution later in the day to another employee to deposit the remaining $7,500, hoping to evade the CTR reporting requirement. Barry should have used multiple accounts to conduct this transaction.
2. Hillary C. needs $16,000 in cash to pay for supplies for her arts and crafts business. Hillary cashes an $8,000 personal check at a financial institution on a Monday. She subsequently cashes another $8,000 personal check at the bank the following day. Hillary is careful to have cashed the two checks on different days and structured the transactions in an attempt to evade the CTR reporting requirement. Hillary should have made irregular deposits on staggered days covering a significant period of time. Or better, yet she should convert her soon worthless cash to precious metals.
3. A married couple, Bill and Hillary, sell a vehicle for $12,000 in cash. To evade the CTR reporting requirement, Bill and Hillary structure their transactions using different accounts. Bill deposits $8,000 of that money into his and Hillary’s joint account in the morning. Later that day, Hillary deposits $1,500 into the joint account, then $2,500 into her sister’s account, which is later transferred to Bill and Hillary’s joint account at the same bank. Again, Bill and Hillary should have used multiple banks.
The aggregate total of the three transactions totals more than the $10,000 threshold, therefore, a SAR would be filed by the bank and you would be the subject of a federal investigation as all three of the above cases clearly violate the federal banking laws related to structuring. It is a federal crime to break up transactions into smaller amounts for the purpose of evading the CTR reporting requirement. In these instances, the bank is required to file a SAR which serves to notify the federal government of an individual’s attempt to structure deposits or withdrawals by circumventing the $10,000 reporting requirement.
Structuring transactions to prevent a CTR from being reported can result in imprisonment for not more than five years and/or a fine of up to $250,000. If structuring involves more than $100,000 in a twelve month period or is performed while violating another law of the 'federal government', the penalty is doubled. This is what former Speaker of the House Dennnis Hastert is facing.
Enforcement
Much like the enforcement of our tax laws, the 'federal government’s' enforcement of its banking laws as it relates to CTR’s, SAR’s and subsequent structuring is quite draconian. Civilian asset forfeiture laws come into play.
The 'government' can seize your bank accounts while it determines if a crime has been committed. The 'government' can literally seize your assets in perpetuity without an order of the court. Of course, you could try and sue but you will be up against the deep pockets of the 'federal government' and the case could take years. By the time your case is decided, the financial banking crisis that you are so desperately trying to avoid by withdrawing your money, could be over. So, proceed with caution.
If you ever become the target of a federal investigation, do not, under any circumstances, allow yourself to be interviewed by 'federal officials' without an attorney present and make sure you have the interview videotaped.
In many cases people go to jail and pay huge fines, not because they have committed a 'federal' crime, but because 'federal officials' state that they have lied or misled them. And if you do not have an attorney present, it is your word versus the 'federal government'. This is how the 'federal government' sent Martha Stewart to prison and Hastert is facing similar charges.
What to Do
The best way to avoid getting your money caught in the bank in the midst of a bank run would be to not let the lion’s share of your money ever cross the bank. Do not allow your employer to direct deposit your check to the bank. Keep some cash at home by taking out a large portion of the money you receive from your employer.
Don’t put cash in a safety box because the courts have also ruled that the banks own your safety boxes.
Use electronic transfers to buy into a mutual funds and also use checks to buy silver coins.
Open multiple banking accounts ranging from the big five megabanks to your local credit unions. You could withdraw much smaller amounts until the sum total of your accounts is greatly diminished and is in your possession. Even though the banks “talk” to each other, if the withdrawals are irregular, it is hard to track and substantiate a pattern in court. To open the accounts, simply write a personal check from your home bank. Of course, in these cases, the bank could hold the check for 15-30 days.
Use checks and cash to pay all of your debts. You want to lower your debt load while unloading your soon to be worthless cash.
Prepay your taxes and some other obligations with checks. Make sure you only pay safe entities. Your 'local government' is not going to disappear, even in a depression. Therefore, you can prepay property taxes. Should you lose the ability to pay your property tax, the 'government' will seize your property for nonpayment.
There will be a post-collapse America, therefore, purchase gold and silver. Gold and silver will be accepted mediums of exchange. Write checks to purchase gold and silver. However, collect the actual silver and gold because if you cannot touch it, you do not own it!
Find a safer bank than the mega banks. Use credit unions as they are one level removed from the Federal Reserve.
Conclusion
I predict the Federal Reserve will steal your money by faking a cyber attack. In fact, last year, FEMA and DHS actually practiced for this event on October 23rd and 24th of 2013.As I wrote on June 12, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Bank of London practiced for widespread banking failure on November 10, 2014. On November 16, 2014, the G20 nations declared your bank deposits to not be money. On August 8, 2012, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the banks own your money when you deposit your paycheck into the bank.
You may not be able to save everything but rest assured you can still save something to live on. The time to have acted was yesterday.
I can anticipate what some of you are now thinking, because I have thought the same thing! If all of us attempt to take even just a portion out of the bank, the 'Federal Reserve' and their servant, the 'federal government', will move to stop all cash withdrawals. Won’t that kind of move serve to expose the criminality of the 'Federal Reserve' and the 'federal government' for all to see?
Awareness is the first step to action and we have the ability to force several issues out on the open at this time.
AFTER years as a civil rights lawyer, I rarely find myself
speechless. But some questions a woman I know posed during a phone
conversation one recent evening gave me pause:
“What would happen if we organized thousands, even
hundreds of thousands, of people charged with crimes to refuse to play
the game, to refuse to plea out? What if they all insisted on their
Sixth Amendment right to trial? Couldn’t we bring the whole system to a
halt just like that?”
The woman was Susan Burton, who knows a lot about being processed through the criminal justice system.
Her odyssey began when a Los Angeles police cruiser ran over and
killed her 5-year-old son. Consumed with grief and without access to
therapy or antidepressant medications, Susan became addicted to crack
cocaine.
She lived in an impoverished black community under siege in the “war
on drugs,” and it was but a matter of time before she was arrested and
offered the first of many plea deals that left her behind bars for a
series of drug-related offenses.
Every time she was released, she found herself trapped in an
under-caste, subject to legal discrimination in employment and housing.
Fifteen years after her first arrest, Susan was finally admitted to a
private drug treatment facility and given a job. After she was clean
she dedicated her life to making sure no other woman would suffer what
she had been through. Susan now runs five safe homes for formerly
incarcerated women in Los Angeles.
Her organization, A New Way of Life,
supplies a lifeline for women released from prison. But it does much
more: it is also helping to start a movement. With groups like All of Us
or None, it is organizing formerly incarcerated people and encouraging
them to demand restoration of their basic civil and human rights.
I was stunned by Susan’s question about plea bargains because she —
of all people — knows the risks involved in forcing prosecutors to make
cases against people who have been charged with crimes. Could she be
serious about organizing people, on a large scale, to refuse to
plea-bargain when charged with a crime?
“Yes, I’m serious,” she flatly replied.
I launched, predictably, into a lecture about what prosecutors would
do to people if they actually tried to stand up for their rights. The
Bill of Rights guarantees the accused basic safeguards, including the
right to be informed of charges against them, to an impartial, fair and
speedy jury trial, to cross-examine witnesses and to the assistance of
counsel.
But in this era of mass incarceration — when our nation’s prison
population has quintupled in a few decades partly as a result of the war
on drugs and the “get tough” movement — these rights are, for the
overwhelming majority of people hauled into courtrooms across America,
theoretical.
More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury.
Most people charged with crimes forfeit their constitutional rights and
plead guilty.
“The truth is that government officials have deliberately engineered
the system to assure that the jury trial system established by the
Constitution is seldom used,” said Timothy Lynch, director of the
criminal justice project at the libertarian Cato Institute. In other
words: the system is rigged.
In the race to incarcerate, politicians champion stiff sentences for
nearly all crimes, including harsh mandatory minimum sentences and
three-strikes laws; the result is a dramatic power shift, from judges to
prosecutors.
The Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that threatening someone with life
imprisonment for a minor crime in an effort to induce him to forfeit a
jury trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to trial.
Thirteen years later, in Harmelin v. Michigan, the court ruled that
life imprisonment for a first-time drug offense did not violate the
Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
No wonder, then, that most people waive their rights. Take the case
of Erma Faye Stewart, a single African-American mother of two who was
arrested at age 30 in a drug sweep in Hearne, Tex., in 2000.
In jail, with no one to care for her two young children, she began to
panic. Though she maintained her innocence, her court-appointed lawyer
told her to plead guilty, since the prosecutor offered probation. Ms.
Stewart spent a month in jail, and then relented to a plea.
She was sentenced to 10 years’ probation and ordered to
pay a $1,000 fine. Then her real punishment began: upon her release, Ms.
Stewart was saddled with a felony record; she was destitute, barred
from food stamps and evicted from public housing.
Once they were homeless, Ms. Stewart’s children were taken away and
placed in foster care. In the end, she lost everything even though she
took the deal.
On the phone, Susan said she knew exactly what was involved in asking
people who have been charged with crimes to reject plea bargains, and
press for trial.
“Believe me, I know. I’m asking what we can do. Can we crash the system just by exercising our rights?”
The answer is yes.
The system of mass incarceration depends almost entirely on
the cooperation of those it seeks to control. If everyone charged with
crimes suddenly exercised his constitutional rights, there would not be
enough judges, lawyers or prison cells to deal with the ensuing tsunami
of litigation.
Not everyone would have to join for the revolt to have an impact; as the legal scholar Angela J. Davis noted,
“if the number of people exercising their trial rights
suddenly doubled or tripled in some jurisdictions, it would create
chaos.”
Such chaos would force mass incarceration to the top of the agenda
for politicians and policy makers, leaving them only two viable options:
sharply scale back the number of criminal cases filed (for drug
possession, for example) or amend the Constitution (or eviscerate it by
judicial “emergency” fiat).
Repetition Of Usurped Government Powers Rendered Unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional usurpations by one branch of government of powers
entrusted to a coequal branch are not rendered constitutional by
repetition.
The United States Supreme Court held unconstitutional hundreds of
laws enacted by Congress over the course of five decades that included a
legislative veto of executive actions in INS v. Chada, 462 U.S. 919
(1982).
Either action would create a crisis and the system would crash — it
could no longer function as it had before. Mass protest would force a
public conversation that, to date, we have been content to avoid.
In telling Susan that she was right, I found myself uneasy.
“As a mother myself, I don’t think there’s anything I
wouldn’t plead guilty to if a prosecutor told me that accepting a plea
was the only way to get home to my children,”
I said.
“I truly can’t imagine risking life imprisonment, so how
can I urge others to take that risk — even if it would send shock waves
through a fundamentally immoral and unjust system?”
Susan, silent for a while, replied:
“I’m not saying we should do it. I’m saying we ought to
know that it’s an option. People should understand that simply
exercising their rights would shake the foundations of our justice
system which works only so long as we accept its terms.
As you know, another brutal system of racial and social control once
prevailed in this country, and it never would have ended if some people
weren’t willing to risk their lives. It would be nice if reasoned
argument would do, but as we’ve seen that’s just not the case.
So maybe, just maybe, if we truly want to end this system, some of us will have to risk our lives.”
Michelle Alexander is the author of “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.” New York Times
Jury Nullification Justice
A society that ignores or downplays Liberty is a culture
that has lost its purpose. In such a regime, the people are relegated to
the whims of the State and every citizen is at risk of criminal
prosecution.
Imagine the most evil attorney, like John Milton from The Devil’s Advocate movie, as a DA.
The irony that the initials for a District Attorney are the same as the title of the script should not be lost.
Al Pacino’s Speech could be given in any courtroom by a zealot persecutor as a closing statement.
Charging God for the injustices of the world, by a government lawyer
and equating the accused with such crimes, gives new meaning to John
Milton’s classic Paradise Lost.
The justice system has little to do with dispensing righteous responsibility.
What is the alternative to a kangaroo court of facilitator judges for
lying state prosecutors? Historically, a verdict decided by jury is the
greatest protection that any defendant can rely upon.
The video, A Layman’s Guide To Jury Nullification provides
an instructive analysis how a jury of ordinary citizens possesses the
legitimate authority to judge both the law and the facts in a case.
The Fully Informed Jury Association provides
tremendous resources, links and information on the rights and
responsibilities of jury duty. The following list of reports grants
permission to copy and distribute each of the documents, if each
document is reproduced without modification.
Before critics reject, the need for essential limits placed upon
judges and checks on the erroneous instructions they routinely provide
that mislead citizens on their constitutional authority, examine closely
some of the pronouncement in legal jurisprudence as compiled by
levellers.org from a cache search. Four examples clarify the right of Jury Nullification.
Justice BYRON WHITE (Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 US 522, 530
(1975)): “The purpose of a jury is to guard against the exercise of
arbitrary power — to make available the commonsense judgment of the
community as a hedge against the overzealous or mistaken prosecutor and
in preference to the professional or perhaps overconditioned or biased
response of a judge.”
THEOPHILUS PARSONS (2 Elliot’s Debates, 94; 2 Bancroft’s History of
the Constitution, p. 267): “If a juror accepts as the law that which the
judge states then that juror has accepted the exercise of absolute
authority of a government employee and has surrendered a power and right
that once was the citizen’s safeguard of liberty, — For the saddest
epitaph which can be carved in memory of a vanished liberty is that it
was lost because its possessors failed to stretch forth a saving hand
while yet there was time.”
4TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS (United States v. Moylan, 417F.2d1006,
1969): “If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize the undisputed
power of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law
as given by a judge, and contrary to the evidence…If the jury feels
that the law under which the defendant is accused is unjust, or that
exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any
reason which appeals to their logic or passion, the jury has the power
to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.”
ALAN SCHEFLIN and JON VAN DYKE (“Jury Nullification: the Contours of a
Controversy,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 43, No.4, 1980): ): “The
arguments for opposing the nullification instruction are, in our view,
deficient because they fail to weigh the political advantages gained by
not lying to the jury…What impact will this deception have on jurors who
felt coerced into their verdict by the judge’s instructions and who
learn, after trail, that they could have voted their consciences and
acquitted? Such a juror is less apt to respect the legal system.”
In the spirit of Jury Rights Day 2013,
another video provides added insight into the excesses of imperial
court arrogance and the way that juries can contravene abuses from the
bench, from state or local government attorneys and Department of
Justice agents. The incomparable champion for Liberty and Justice,
Lysander Spooner in An Essay on the Trial by Jury, could not be more profound as he traces the tradition of the jury system.
That
all these courts were mere courts of conscience, in which the juries
were sole judges, administering justice according to their own ideas of
it, is not only shown by the extracts [*79] already given, but is
explicitly acknowledged in the following one, in which the modern
“courts of conscience” are compared with the ancient hundred and count
courts, and the preference [*80] given to the latter, on the ground that
the duties of the jurors in the one case, and of the commissioners in
the other, are the same, and that the consciences of a jury are a safer
and purer [*81] tribunal than the consciences of individuals specially
appointed, and holding permanent offices.
Since the conscience of the juror is the proper standard for a
valid verdict, what measures can an informed citizenry take to combat
charlatan courts from denying the common law protections?
One such effort is an ad campaign directly from the belly of the
beast, the District of Criminals. As reported by the Washington Post in Billboard advocating jury nullification concerns local prosecutors, “Supporters of jury nullification in several cities have raised the ire of judges and prosecutors.”
Such horror for the privileged class of esquire barristers practicing – The Butchered Law.
So, when activist James Babb, from that previously cited, Fully
Informed Jury Association, places informative billboards at Metro
stations near the courts telling passersby about jury nullification, the
ancient right of jurors to judge both the facts and the law, the legal
establishment shutters in fear that their corrupt gatekeeper system will
be overturned.
“Jury
nullification no doubt infuriates prosecutors, judges, and indeed all
the petty tyrants of officialdom. Genuine democracy generally has this
effect. Our ruling
class is pleased to call the farcical, heavily gamed elections
periodically held to confirm them in power “democracy,” but the power of
the jury to disregard the law and do justice as they see it represents
genuine democracy, that is, demokratia, or people power. Indeed jury
nullification represents one of the few remaining bastions of genuine
democracy in our technocratically managed society. It must be
truly maddening for the legal technocrats to have their pompously
ridiculous nonsense overthrown by a gaggle of mere citizens lacking, as
they often do, fine degrees and prestigious titles. And so they
try and try to quash information about the real point of juries —
deciding upon a just verdict — in order to render them passive and
easily controlled, to turn them from real, functioning juries into
inanimate totems used as props for the kabuki shows that we are assured
are “fair trials.”
Currently in the news is a great lesson. A courageous jury sends a
clear message to a fraudulent prosecution and a politicized court. From Pro-Gun Sheriff Found Not Guilty,
“jury nullifies false arrest of Nick Finch who supported Second
Amendment. After closing arguments by prosecutors and the defense, the
jury took less than 90 minutes to reach its verdict.”
However, before sincere citizens declare victory over black robe
magistrates and tyrannical District Attorneys, the New American raises
further concerns in,
“Despite
Finch’s acquittal, the question remains why a duly elected,
constitutional sheriff was arrested for the actions he allegedly took.
Why was Sheriff Finch not contacted by the FDLE or the governor and
asked to answer the charges against him in a more disciplinary and less
overtly legally hostile manner? Will Scott
and his successors use the Finch case as precedent for the assumption of
the power of approval over voters’ election of county sheriffs? Will every
act of every one of those sheriffs in the 67 counties in the Sunshine
State be subject to summary dismissal should they do something that
doesn’t sit well with the governor or his wealthy campaign supporters?” The Sheriff Has More Power Than The President Of The
United States In His County Governor Has No Power To Remove A Sheriff
Nor Reinstate. This Was A Nothing More Than A Sham Showcase Against The
Powers Of The U.S. Sheriff.
Sheriff SWAT Team Works For Citizens In Each And Every County In Their United States Of America.
Government courts have become bastions for State absolution and
dispensers of citizen oppression. The Cato Institute recommends that Jurors Should Know Their Rights.
Clay Conrad’s book, Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine is described as “This is the most important book on the independence of juries since Lysander Spooner’s Trial by Jury in 1852.
It is meticulously researched and balanced. The enjoyment of
reading it stems as much from the beauty of Clay Conrad’s writing as
from the comprehensiveness of his analysis and the fascinating and
important nature of his subject.”
As long as judges act as enforcers of equity law in an admiralty
court tribunal, the jury is the last refuge for justice. As for
government prosecutors, DA’s are in service of the devil state. Support
the Common Law Grand Jury movement and take back citizen control of the courts.
SARTRE – November 4, 2013
President John Adams
JOHN ADAMS – 1771
“It’s not only ….(the juror’s) right, but his
duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best
understanding, judgement, and conscience, though in direct opposition to
the direction of the court.”
It is time to leave America? Is it possible to leave the country and leave with your assets in tow? And where would you go? There are many indicators that tell us that we have totally lost our country. Nowhere is this more evident than it is with what our media is choosing to glorify and so many of our young people are choosing to emulate the trash that the media is putting out.
We Live In a Country That Glorifies What It Used to Call Perversion
You now live in a country where nearly every vaccine contains aborted fetal cell products.Cecile Richards (i.e. the modern day Dr. Mengele, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, defended the organization’s practices of selling aborted fetal body parts. Why isn’t this monster in prison?
Wanted by Planned Parenthood.
A Snippet From the Local News
Last night, while watching the local San Diego Channel 6 News, I took note of the two featured stories from the news broadcast: 1. The Gay Pride Parade in which the report claimed over 300,000 people will attend the event on July 18. The event was not merely covered as a news story, it was glorified as if it were a New Years Eve celebration at Times Square. Of course, nothing is mentioned about the virtues of family life and traditional marriage on this broadcast. Can you only imagine the uproar if “extremist” heterosexuals were to sponsor their own “Hetero Pride March”. It would be welcomed with the same animosity as a Confederate flag flying in the south. 2. The celebration of Ramadan was also given a great deal of attention.
Again the news reports made breaking the link between terrorist acts and Islam a primary issue. Please keep in mind that the religious leaders were not saying we disavow violence as a medium of Islamic political expression. They were denying any possible link between the two variables. This news report was not a matter of fact mention of the holiday,which would have been fine, it was the glorification of the religion and how pristine the religion is when it comes to world politics. Really? What about 9/11? What about Pan Am 103 over Scotland? I don’t deny heinous acts carried out in the name of Christianity and neither should the Muslims. Are there any Christian groups running through the Middle East beheading members of the Islamic faith? Of course, on this station, nothing about Christianity could be found at anytime during our vacation stay. The point being, I do not have a problem with the mention of a religious holiday or a social event. I do have a problem with the glorification of these events to the total exclusion of my lifestyle choices. Being a Christian father in a long-term marriage is being marginalized in the American media and I am sick of it! I can recognize propaganda when I see it. Keep in mind, our children are being conditioned by this same propaganda. I know better, can you count on your children to know the difference?
What Kind of Country Do We Now Live In?
We live in a country that murders millions around the globe so corporations like EXXON can garner a bigger market share. We live in a country that is under de facto martial law with a record number of troops on the street and we call it Jade Helm. And the media, doesn’t report Jade Helm for what it is, the first military occupation of this country since Reconstruction. Jade Helm is being reported as an event that only conspiracy theorists would find objectionable. We live in a country in which it is merely a matter of time until bail-ins come to our banks and gobble up your life savings and retirement accounts. We live in a country, under relative tyranny, where every email is read, every phone call is listened to and your every movement is tracked and dissident journalists are harassed and even murdered by federal agencies such as the rogue NSA, CIA and IRS? Are you thinking about escaping our corrupt and criminal government that has been hijacked by the bankers? The level of growing tyranny and brutal martial law enforcement is off the charts. Many are too old to fight and to fat to run. However, if you want you and your family to have chance to grow old in relative peace, my advice to all Americans is simple. If you are not going to fight, then you better get out of the country while you still can because the sides have been drawn and the conflict is coming. Should you leave America, can you leave America? Are there more reasons to leave America? The answers to the first two questions are unclear to many. However, the answer to the last question is an unqualified yes!
Record Expatriation of US Citizens
Americans are leaving the country at record speed and the annual rate of expatriation is growing as over 150,000 Americans departed the former land of liberty for greener pastures overseas in the past year. In fact, there are now over five million Americans who are choosing to live outside the United States. Just why are Americans leaving this land of “freedom” and opportunity in record numbers, with no end in sight?
Would you renounce your U.S. citizenship if it meant you’d be sending less of your hard-earned dollars to Uncle Sam? Do you want affordable health care? Do you desire to live a long and healthy life? Do you want your children to have an affordable college education? Do you want to retire in relative comfort? Do you desire to live your life with more freedoms than you presently enjoy and not have to worry about government harassment? On balance, should most Americans stay or go?
There are reasons and myths which both favor and discourage expatriation. Below, I have listed a set of generalized statements about the viability of leaving America and these notions are examined.
The Highest Taxes In the World
The number one reason that Americans are fleeing the country is because of high taxes. The income tax rate rose last year to 39.6% from 35% for individuals earning more than $400,000 a year and married couples earning more than $450,000. Also, 77% of Americans will pay higher federal tax rates because the cuts in Social Security payroll taxes expired when Congress passed its tax package on New Year’s Day 2013 . The Tax Policy Center estimates that those who earn more than $1 million would pay an average of $170,341 more in taxes. If you are middle class or poor, you may not have the means to leave and your taxes have not been as dramatically impacted as the wealthy. It is a fact that expatriation does favor the upper middle class because one has to have a significant income to benefit from a potential move. In other words, if you are the owner of an Obama phone, you are better off staying in the country because you have little to tax.
We Can’t Leave Our Great US Pensions Behind
It is a myth that America has a good set of retirement systems.You are not getting the best pension packagecompared to other Western nations as America ranks dead last in overall pension benefits. And this is in the backdrop of the nothing-to-lose, second term Obama Administration, who is preparing to seize your 401k pensions. Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew has already starting raided federal pension funds this last year so the government does not exceed the debt ceiling. America, your money is not even safe in the bank as witnessed by the fact that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals who ruled that banks can steal the money of its depositors and it is legal! There are no golden years in America unless you are in the infamous 1%.
Americans Stay for Higher Pay
Americans no longer live in the highest salary paying country in the world. In fact, the United States does not even crack the top ten list of the highest salary paying countries on the planet in which Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Japan, Norway, Austria, Belgium, Ireland, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom round out the top ten and pay their workers more than workers in the United States. In fact, the United States only ranks 20th in terms of overall gross pay! One would be very naive to call America the land of opportunity.
If We Leave Our Children’s Education Will Suffer
The Education Policy Institute assessed the affordability of higher education costs and found that the United States ranks 13th in higher education affordability. At a time when our schools are producing students which are performing last in math and science as compared our industrialized cohort nations, leaving the country, in many cases, would benefit a child’s educational attainment. And do not forget that the Common Core Standards have come online and they will dramatically increase the dumbing down of American students. Most Americans mistakenly think they will help their children to rise above the rest by going to college. That type of thinking can be a financial death trap. To those who think your children can borrow their way to a degree, think again. Today’s U.S. college loan practices, which serves to underwrite much of the cost of a college education, are the most predatory in the world. As of 2013,bankruptcy cannot cancelout a student loan debt and delinquent college students can now go to jail for nonpayment. In fact, several federal agencies have even “swat teamed” many delinquent student loan defaulters. Nowhere else in the world can we find evidence of these types of predatory practices being used against college students as we do here in the United States. Even those who are degreed and/or skilled in fields such as engineering or information technology skills, are really wasting their time working in the United States. Eight of the world’s ten highest-paying countries for information technology (IT) managers are in Western Europe, according to a new survey by Mercer Human Resource Consulting. The survey found that Swiss managers are paid the most, followed by those in Germany and Denmark. In fact, IT management is another field where U.S. workers fail to crack the top ten in income, the United States ranks 14th in IT management compensation. Even debt ridden Spain, Italy and Greece pay their IT managers more than what Americans earn on average. If you child is striving to become a high tech employee, they would be better leaving the country.
We Cannot Leave This Good Health Care Behind
The United States spends more than the next 12 nations for health care. However, it seems as if we are spending more and enjoying it less as, despite our exorbitant spending on health care, the United States ranks 50th in the world in life expectancy. Cuba, Puerto Rico and Spain have higher life expectancies than the United States. Americans live in the only country in the world where its citizens cannot bargain shop for its medicines in foreign countries because the pharmaceuticals have convinced congress to establish a pharmaceutical monopoly over U.S. citizens. Death by doctor has increased to 225,000 per year. Healthcare would be an excellent reason to leave.
The Most Compelling Reasons to Leave
The NDAA, which allows for unconstitutional and indefinite detention by the administration without any due process, is reason enough to leave. If you are unfamiliar with the NDAA, Google the term and be prepared to be shocked.
Executive Order 13603 is also reason enough to leave the country. Go to the search engine on this site and Google this executive order and you will see that slave labor is part of the equation as well as the forfeiture of all private property and business interests.
With the release of the federal government documents pertaining to entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations(PDF) came to light. The document was originally to be kept secret, but everyone in the military command structure, as we know, is not on board with the encroaching tyranny sweeping across this country. The document is a recipe book on how to organize and maintain a FEMA camp. I would suggest that all Americans turn off the TV for an evening and read the document which spells out what life will be like for millions of Americans. The language makes it crystal clear that one of the primary purposes of these numerous camps will be slave labor. The stunning descriptions of these plans can be read here. What happens to the elderly, the handicapped and the infirm? History clearly demonstrates that when slave laborers no longer serve their intended purpose to the state, they are exterminated. Is this what these well publicized FEMA coffins are for?
Is self-preservation enough of a reason to fight or flee?
Juxtaposition for Ex-Pats
We used to joke in this country that Americans build fences to keep people out and the Soviet Union built forces to keep people in. The American government is presently implementing financial and new tax policies which allows you to leave, but a much greater portion of your money must stay behind. Do you remember when American comedians used to joke about the former Soviet Union by saying “In Mother Russia, you don’t watch TV, the TV watches you?” Some articles write their own conclusion.
(Why
is Mehran Keshe offering Technologies to ALL countries for which some reject it and claim they are superior, yet those that accept them for PEACE Shut Down those other CABAL countries in the similar Technologies!)
Mike
Harris/ Mehran Keshe - Plasma Technologies - 27 May 2015
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
