Defending National Sovereignty From The NWO
“Sovereignty…as understood in the Declaration of Independence was originally, and by nature, the equal and unalienable possession of individual human beings. The original equality of all human beings was an equality of sovereignty; no man had more right to rule another than the other had to rule him.”
― Harry V. Jaffa
In
a world that is virtually unrecognizable from the universal principles
that underpinned Western Civilization, the fundamental concept of
national sovereignty is being attacked as a relic of a former age. The
New World Order is designed to eliminate the self-government of
sovereign nations. While individuals live under the domain of
established states, the fact that specific regimes operate within and
often under the auspices of international hegemony that routinely
violates the independence of specific countries is undeniable. The “world community”
is not a voluntary association of collaborating governments; it is a
euphemism of a top down despotic authoritarian system for global control
and punishment for uncooperative governments.
When
the United Nations was established after World War II, the true
objective of destroying the axis of competing Neo Global Totalitarianism
exposed its real path and agenda for worldwide domination. The New
World Order emerged with the full blessing of the United States. An
uninterrupted march towards imposing the will of global elites upon
individual countries has been the results from setting into motion the
forces of internationalism.
America
has been totally betrayed by our designated and appointed officials
during the decades of systematic dismantling of our independence and
economic prosperity. With this assault against the nation-state, the
peoples of the world have been herded into a global concentration camp
that far exceeds the wildest dreams of the Nazi SS.
NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY: WHY IT IS WORTH DEFENDING by Cornell professor Jeremy Rabkin, who provides a compelling argument. Review his book, The Case for Sovereignty.
“Many people criticize national sovereignty as implying that there is no appeal beyond the sovereign state. But there is always some appeal, because there are always other states offering competing examples and places of refuge for those fleeing the most onerous policies of particular states. The idea of national sovereignty is inseparable from the idea of a multitude of sovereignties, hence there is some possibility for choice, which implies the possibility of mistakes or wrong choices which others may avoid. Where there is least chance for appeal is from a world that is governed by one and only one set of world standards.”
Now
what happens when the planet rushes towards a one world government?
Jeremy Rabkin continues on some pressing questions in the interview, A Defense of Sovereignty.
“All members of the EU have now bound themselves to a scheme in which the European Court of Justice treats mere treaties as superior to national constitutions–and national courts give priority to the rulings of this European Court, even against their own parliaments and their own national constitutions. This is way, way, way, beyond anything we could accept in America. To find an analogy, you must imagine that NAFTA officials in Montreal claim the authority to override the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court–and federal judges in America agree that the NAFTA policy must take priority.What makes the European scheme particularly bizarre–at least from our point of view–is that Europeans aren’t really prepared to pursue their “Union” to its logical conclusion. They don’t trust the EU to have an army or police or even criminal courts of its own. So Europeans are entrusting supremacy to a government they don’t really trust–at least not enough to entrust with traditional attributes of sovereignty.”
Americans
are not much different from their European cousins. They no longer
trust the political class. Selected leaders are not elected but must
pass a screening process to gain office. They do not protect the common
culture and national integrity, but only serve the interest of the
globalists.
Steven Groves asks, Why Does Sovereignty Matter to America?
“A people subject to foreign taxation, or to being transported across the seas to face criminal charges in a foreign land, are not truly independent. In the Declaration, the Founding Fathers gave notice that these infringements on American sovereignty would not stand.But today, our sovereignty faces new threats. International organizations and courts seek to reshape the international system. Nations are to give up their sovereignty and be governed by a “global consensus.” Independent, sovereign nations will be replaced by “transnational” organizations that reject national sovereignty.The demand that the United States bow to this “global consensus” does not respect American sovereignty. The offenses the Founders complained of in the Declaration of Independence now have an international flavor. This new project is filled with examples of institutions, courts, and “taxes” that violate the spirit of the Declaration:”
Some
traditionalist cast the dilemma in a framework that no longer applies
in a world where counties are unable, and certainly unwilling, to wage
war against hostile governments.
The Thomas More Law Center promotes a Just War viewpoint in their Defending National Security introduction.
“The Thomas More Law Center supports America’s First Military Principles of Virtue, Honor, Patriotism and Subordination, established by John Adams in 1775. The U.S. military is the most effective fighting force in the history of the world, and it is the only institution Americans can depend on to defend our Nation and our Constitution. The Law Center opposes any attempt to downsize, degrade or dismantle the combat effectiveness of our Armed Forces.The Law Center opposes any attempt to surrender our national sovereignty to the United Nations or any other international organization. In addition, the Law Center supports the right of States to protect their borders against the massive invasion of illegal immigrants.”
Posing
a dialectic nature between national sovereignty and the NWO misses the
most important aspect of the post WWII migration into a global gulag.
Primary elements behind the organization of the New World Order are the
evil elites that actually run and dictate their master plan on America
itself.
Long
before the American Revolution, the European dynasties of cosmic
control lusted for total domination. America, from its inception posed
the last best hope for humanity. The persistent and methodical
encroachment into the very fabric of independent self-government has
been part of the eternal struggle, which was transplanted into the new
world.
Over
the centuries the disease of populace subjugation grew with each
succeeding generation. The breakdown of awareness and the sapping of the
will to resist the drive to impose governance in place of
self-determination has resulted in the internationalization of the body
politik.
Efforts like that of THE CENTER FOR SOVEREIGNTY & SECURITY, have a noble objective.
“An informed and engaged citizenry is vital to the health of our Republic. Freedom Alliance’s Center for Sovereignty and Security educates lawmakers, opinion leaders, and the public at large on a host of issues – particularly those that relate to national sovereignty, national security, and constitutional government.”
However,
it is a losing battle to view the conflict in a simple us against them
context. When the us is a primary director of the global tyranny, how
can our own government be trusted to direct its energies to abolish the
NWO traitors that have become the actual architects of the globalist
system of aristocratic privilege.
Because
of this fundamental quandary, informed and rational patriots are now
targeted as the ‘Enemy of the State”. In order to transcend this false
perversion of national sovereignty, the true nature and meaning of
nation needs to be crystal clear. A nation is the embodiment of the
people. The sovereignty resides within the individual person before he
or she provides consent to any governmental organization or structure
that operates only under the authority granted by a free population.
As
it stands now, the American government has forfeited any claim as a
legitimate steward of the public trust. Compounding this fact is that
the technocratic superstructure of agencies, institutions and
authorities has become integral parts of inflicting the New World Order
upon the entire world.
Contrary
to the hopes and dreams of the few remaining loyal Americans of the
revolution, there is no George Washington coming to your rescue on a
white horse.
True national sovereignty starts with resistance to all forms of government compliance that fosters and is part of Obeying the Nefarious Warrior Organism.
When the Marquis de Lafayette speaks of “natural and imprescriptible rights”, those civil liberties are endowed by our creator and cannot be rightfully be removed by any regime.
Citizens must come to embrace their Inherent Autonomy.
Throughout all of history, force and coercion has been the primary tool
used by governments to compel a given population into compliance.
The
New World Order certainly follows this convention but uses and relies
upon a much more potent component. Public acquiescence and voluntary
abidance is the primary factor that feed the cavalcade of capitulation.
A
global outcry of opposition to the integration and consolidation of the
New World Order dictatorship is required in order to defend national
sovereignty. Democracy has proven that electing champions of a
traditional society has failed because the quality of the character of
citizens has sunk to the level of dullard serfs.
The burden of responsibility falls upon the remaining moral and honorable souls to defend all that is worth protecting.
SARTRE is the pen name
of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s
formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served
as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in
many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent
business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small
business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded
opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and
international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a
world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a
rural community. “Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s
perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be
restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will
require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S
intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a
common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not
seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions
that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career
because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the
challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is
achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is
SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to
join in on this journey. Visit his website at http://batr.org.
