ALERT! UPDATES AND WARNINGS FROM ACROSS THE NATION TO ALL AMERICANS

ALERT!   
 

UPDATES  AND  WARNINGS  FROM  ACROSS  THE  NATION  TO  ALL  AMERICANS


OCTOBER 9 2015
http://www.stevequayle.com/index.php?s=33

With the million man march coming and this collapse coming as well. The ones effected the most are those whom are dependent the most. Including those who depend on the Govt. to survive	Oct 9, 2015
Are You Ready For The New Beast System Roll Out Next Week? I have 1 credit card and 1 debit card. I received a chipped card from both carriers, I threw them away. Now I've been notified that if I don't start using the chipped card my cards will be... read more

	LOOKS LIKE BOTH WEST COAST AND EAST COAST POWER IS GOING TO BE SHUT DOWN AND LOOK WHOSE DOING IT	Oct 9, 2015
Steve, My ex was called by an old employer he used to work military contracts with. They want him to come help shut down a big power plant in Colombia SC. Just thought you'd like to know. S... read more

L.E.O, we have been getting reports that domestic terrorist have been trying to shut down the grid, and so has China and Russia	Oct 8, 2015
Hello Mr. Quayle I follow your website several time a day and would like to say it is very informative, I live in Vernal Utah, I have a life long friend in Castle Dale Utah we text quite often, she was telling me yesterday that she is dating a... read more

WARNING OF HOW SERIOUS IT IS RIGHT NOW FROM FEDERAL ACTIVE LEO SOURCE-HIGH UP	Oct 7, 2015
Like I told you before Steve there's a lot of us out there in the top secret and beyond community that is pushing out intel little by little. This sadly is my mind set now, those that I've told, I gave all the same warning. When it starts, and if you... read more

THOSE WHO HAVE BEATEN DOWN SILVER AND GOLD ,AND WHO HAVE CORNERED THE MARKET ARE READY TO MAKE THEIR PLAY NOW-DRIVING PRICES HIGHER	Oct 6, 2015
IT’S AMAZING THAT WITH SILVER BULLION COINS AND BARS VERY DIFFICULT TO ACQUIRE AND THE LARGEST PREMIUMS OVER SPOT IN RECENT HISTORY,THAT PEOPLE STILL DONT SEE THE HANDWRITING ON THE WALL.OVER 20 YEARS AGO I STATED ON TALK RADIO REPEATEDLY THAT SPOT P... read more

THE CAPTAIN ASKED HIM AND SEVERAL OTHER YOUNGER MARINES IF THEY WERE MENTALLY PREPARED TO START GOING DOOR TO DOOR AND CONFISCATING WEAPONS FROM CIVILIANS IN TEXAS. THIS ALSO MEANS CHECKPOINTS ON HIGHWAYS AND OTHER ROADS TO CATCH PEOPLE IN THEIR VEHICLES.

Oct 3, 2015

THE MOTHER OF A US MARINE FROM LUMBERTON TEXAS CAME INTO MY SISTERS WORKPLACE (HER COWORKER) VISIBLY DISTRAUGHT AND IN TEARS. SHE CONFIDED IN HER THAT HER SON WHO HAS ONLY BEEN OUT OF BOOT CAMP FOR A FEW MONTHS WAS TOLD BY HIS CAPTAIN THAT HIS COMPAN... read more

More “Moving” Countries and Changing Geography

 

MORE  "MOVING"  COUNTRIES  AND  CHANGING  GEOGRAPHY

  

The Mandela Effect

alternate memories… alternate history?

Many people remember islands, land masses, and countries in alternate locations. Some of those memories are startlingly similar.

I discussed this in two previous articles. The first was about Sri Lanka’s location, since that had attracted considerable comment.

The other article was about checking older maps, in case newer maps have been altered for political reasons. I showed the process I’d used to clarify Sri Lanka’s location, then and now.

However, specific countries and land masses seem to recur in our discussions. I’m moving those comments to this newer post, so they’re all in one location. (No pun intended.)

Many of the “altered” locations are around the Indian Ocean, but some are not.  New Zealand and land masses around Korea have been the most surprising (and consistent), so far.


So far, the major location discrepancies seem to relate to:

• Andorra
• Cuba
• Denmark & Sweden – islands nearby
• Korea
• Japan
• Mongolia
• New Zealand
• Oceania (in general)
• Poland
• Portugal
• Sri Lanka (at its own article)

And then there are odd media references, such as the globe in the movie, Dazed and Confused. 

Are they pranks, Easter eggs, or the kinds of references that document a dramatically changing global landscape?

 

from “Dazed and Confused,” (c)1993 by Universal Studios / Gramercy Pictures / Alphaville. 

Close-up:

 

from “Dazed and Confused,” (c)1993 by Universal Studios / Gramercy Pictures / Alphaville.

Compare that with this satellite image:

DOES HISTORY EXPLAIN ALTERNATE GEOGRAPHICAL MEMORIES?

The Mandela Effect

alternate memories… alternate history?

A West Wing clip highlights some issues that make accurate geography challenging.  While this was intended as a humorous scene, some people get lost in the political implications and label this "lineral propaganda."

In the context of alternate geography, political agendas (if there are any) aren’t the point.  History — and how it might continue to influence our maps — is relevant.


Here’s the video:

 Why are we changing maps?

So, I think we need to look at current maps for modern-day references, and then at old maps to see if our memories are based on them.

People have reported a variety of locations that have moved.

Maybe our “alternate” memories are based on older maps from childhood geography classes, and those maps have been corrected in recent years.

Let’s rule that out, and then dig deeper.

For example, related to our discussion of Sri Lanka’s location — where it is in relation to India — I’d double- check where it is on maps in this timestream.  

The following map is provided courtesy of Google Maps, (c)2013.

 

The next is a topological map, courtesy of Uwe Dedering. 

So, we know where the country is, and what it looks like, on today’s maps in this timestream.

Then, I’d look at old maps of Ceylon, an earlier name for Sri Lanka. I like to go back as far as I can, and then work forward to the 21st century.

The first map is dated around 1535, by Claudius Ptolemy. 

To determine the suggested location, a north-south orientation is needed......  

First, look at where the mountains are, compared with current maps. Then, Indian geographical references must be used.

Based on the mountains, I’d guess that this showed Ceylon southwest of India. (If my reference points are wrong, I didn’t check the smaller islands indicated on that map, and they may suggest a different orientation.)

A map from around 1650 shows only the outline and geography of Ceylon, with no nearby land masses, except very small islands.  So, this map isn’t especially relevant to our study of Ceylon’s location in relation to India.

What caught my interest was how different the shape was, in this map.  I studied where the mountains are indicated, to get a sense of this map’s orientation. (This is one of several illustrations from Plantas das fortalezas, pagodes & ca. da ilha de Ceilão, a book by a cartographer and illustrator.)

Here’s another map from around 1700 – 1710, by Heinrich Scherer. Relative to India, this map suggests the southeast location indicated on maps in our current timestream. (This actual map came from the Maps Collection at the Library of Congress “American Memory” site.)

 

A 1733 map shows the same placement. 

The really old maps are intriguing, but the earlier the map, the more questionable its accuracy.

It looks as if “alternate geography” memories of Sri Lanka’s location aren’t based on 20th century maps that were recently corrected. 

As far back as 1700 — and perhaps earlier — Sri Lanka (Ceylon) was represented at the southeast side of India.

This entry was posted in Alternate Geography, Asia on 14 November 13 by Fiona Broome. 

 

http://mandelaeffect.com/history-explain-alternate-geographical-memories 

The Reality - and Proof - Of Weather Warfare

Engineering “1000 Year” Weather Catastrophes, The Reality Of Weather Warfare


Dane Wigington

geoengineeringwatch.org

 
A "1000 year" flood has just occurred on the East Coast and a "1200 year" drought continues to worsen rapidly on the West Coast. In fact record shattering floods and droughts are rapidly accelerating all around the globe. "Official sources", of course, tell the American public that unprecedented weather events are just "natural" and the vast majority unfortunately accept this lie without so much as a second thought. 

Though countless anthropogenic (human) activities have done immense damage to the climate system, the ongoing global climate engineering (weather warfare) insanity is the greatest single disrupting factor of all. 

"100 year" disasters are now occurring every 100 days or less. 

The images below should be carefully examined. The flow of moisture from hurricane Joaquin was manipulated between a clockwise spinning high pressure zone to the north of Joaquin and a counterclockwise spinning low pressure zone to the west of Joaquin. 

There were at least 8 meteorological factors that all had to come together in order to create the fire hose effect that just devastated South Carolina. Even more astounding consideration is that these factors generally remained in place for three consecutive days. 

The spinning vortex from Joaquin helped the climate engineers cover the Northeast with heavily aerosolized SRM cloud canopy.

Hurricane Joaquin was essentially a water pump for the geoengineers and the immense moisture from this source was profoundly focused on a specific region, South Carolina. 

 

 

Does this precipitation map look "natural" to you? The combination of factors required to create such a concentrated flow of moisture over such a distance was completely unprecedented. This image and the scenario it records is nothing short of shocking. Precipitation modeling image credit: James Spann

 

In a rapidly warming world deluge events would be expected to increase. But it is the intentional manipulation of the climate system that is making some events so concentrated and deadly.  

Record breaking rains inundated South Carolina

Hurricane Joaquin was initially forecasted to make US landfall, in fact, it initially showed many similarities to the initial stages of hurricane "Sandy".  Then, literally overnight, all the "forecasts" changed. Meteorologists stated on the record that hurricane Joaquin was very hard to predict. 

How can the weather be predicted when the climate is being completely manipulated by multiple global powers? Yet, the geoengineering elephant in the room remains a tabu subject in the meteorological and mainstream media communities. 

Meteorologists are paid to explain away the completely engineered weather as "natural", they are covering the tracks for the geoengineers. 

As of October 5, 2015, the path of "Joaquin" was being heavily sprayed with aerosols by jet aircraft as the satellite photos below clearly show.  

 

 

Massive aerosol spraying is clearly visible across the North Atlantic (top center of above image) directly in the path of Joaquin.

Joaquin is heading toward (being steered?) the extremely anomalous cold "blob" in the North Atlantic which has scientists "puzzled". Excessive atmospheric moisture is a necessary component of the chemically nucleated short term cool-downs being carried out around the globe. Could the geoengineers have an agenda to direct this major moisture producing storm to this region? 

Many scientists are already concerned about the effect the "cold blob" is having on the thermohaline circulation (Gulf Stream), could the climate engineers be attempting to actually manipulate this critical ocean current? 

On the opposite side of the US the "forecasts" (scheduled weather) for continued record heat, drought, and fires, are still worsening.  

The map above is a NOAA "departure from normal high temperature graphic. Each color coded band represents 2-3 degrees above "normal" temperatures. If this "forecast" map does not look alarming to you, it should. For the record, private defense industry contractor "Raytheon" does the weather "modeling" for NOAA and NWS (The National Weather Service). Raytheon is involved in the climate engineering industry.

The engineered Western US meltdown continues as the geoengineers attempt to keep the Eastern US cooled down. Though weather "whiplash" of up and down hot and cold events is occurring in the US East, overall cooler temps in the eastern half of the US lower 48 are so anomalous that scientists (who refuse to acknowledge climate engineering) can't figure it out. 

Even Major University scientists have questioned how the Eastern US can be anomalously cool in a record warm world. 

How is it possible that the Eastern US has remained cooler overall during the last 3 years? This is in spite of the fact that high temperature records continue to be shattered all over the globe? 

The graphic above is an NOAA "departure from normal precipitation" map. Along with the record heat, far below normal rainfall is also forecasted (scheduled) for the already drought devastated California. The contradictions of precipitation reflected in this "forecast" map are a further reflection of the ongoing total manipulation of the climate system.

 

As 2014 ended the California drought was considered the worse in at least 1200 years and it has gotten much worse since. If all available data is taken into account, the particular case of the California drought must be considered a direct consequence of the ongoing geoengineering/solar radiation management programs. 

Climate engineering is weather warfare, nothing less. 

Record shattering rainfall and record shattering drought are rapidly increasing around the globe. The highly toxic fallout from the ongoing jet aircraft aerosol spraying means that climate engineering must also be considered biological warfare. 

I receive many communications from people around the world asking "where can I move to in order to escape these programs"? Answer, there is no place to hide. We have only one choice, to unite in our efforts to expose and halt the climate engineering insanity.  

Make your voice heard in this most critical battle while there is yet any part of Earth's life support systems left to salvage. 

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/engineering-1000-year-weather-catastrophes-the-reality-of-weather-warfare/

 

When was the last time you saw anything like this in the Republican Party?

YOU  MUST  SEE  THIS!  

Hispanic  Supporter  GOES  LOCO  On  Stage  Meeting  Donald Trump! 

Jim Hoft Oct 8th, 2015 7:54 pm 

 

THIS IS IS A PHENOMENON FOLKS! THIS IS AN ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT REVOLUTION!

WATCH THIS AMAZING VIDEO — WOW! SCREW THE MEDIA!  SCREW THE GOP ELITES!

TRUMP IS TAKING THE COUNTRY BY STORM!

At the rally in Las Vegas Donald Trump discussed being on magazine covers.

‘I think I’m on 14 covers this week. I’m on more covers than any supermodel in history!”

He brought a female supporter from Colombia on stage and signed her magazine.

“I’m Hispanic and I vote for Mr. Trump! We vote for Mr. Trump! Yes! Mr. Trump. We LOVE YOU! We LOVE YOU!”

When was the last time you saw anything like this in the Republican Party?

WATCH THE ENTIRE CLIP!
It is AMAZING!

 

OUR QUESTION:  WHY THE GOLD FRINGED MARITIME LAW FLAGS OF THE USA CRIMINAL CORPORATION - THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE BANKRUPT AND NO LONGER HAS A REGISTERED CHARTER?   

HAS THE CABAL CREATED A NEW CHARTER OFF SHORE - FRANCE PERHAPS? -  ON WHICH IT NOW IS OPERATING CRIMINALLY  TO YET AGAIN CONTINUE TO SCREW AMERICA?   

WHAT DOES THAT TELL ALL AMERICA?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/10/you-must-see-this-hispanic-supporter-goes-loco-on-stage-meeting-donald-trump-video/

The UN Takeover Is Already Here

THE  UN  TAKEOVER  IS  ALREADY  HERE  AND  IT  WILL  ANGER  YOU  TO  THE  CORE!!   NEXT  STEP ....

By Lisa Haven

October 8, 2015

Those who have lived in a communist controlled country know the evils that surround it. They know that nothing belongs to them and that the government not only owns all property and business but also the people themselves. They were told where they could or could not live, how much food they could eat, and how to run their business. 

The government oversaw and controlled every aspect of their lives. Those in power controlled everyone below them and sadly this is exactly what will happen when the New World Order is implemented. 

The United Nations is now going public with its plan to “Globalize the World.” It includes everything from a world police force, to a major gun grab, to targeting those in objection. All the cards are already in play, the only move left is to act!

Here is the breaking report…

 UN TAKEOVER HAPPENING NOW

 OBAMA'S UN TAKEOVER PLOT REVEALED 

BY TEXAS JUDGE

 

 

DEMS  ISSUE  FLURRY  OF  NEW  GUN  CONTROL  BILLS

Timed with Obama's controversial visit to Oregon town hit by tragedy

Published: 20 hours ago

October 8 2015
WND

 

Leo Hohmann

 

"If school security guards pack heat, then shooters like the one in Roseburg, Oregon, could not wreak havoc on American school children", said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

 

Democrats unleashed a flurry of new gun-control laws in Congress Thursday, and one senator from Connecticut accused Congress of being “an accomplice” in the recent spate of mass shootings at school campuses.

Senate Democrats fortified their efforts with a threat to block other legislation until their gun-control bills are brought to the floor.

And there are a lot of them.

According to Time magazine, the package features a version of an earlier proposal to expand background checks, but now also includes online gun purchases and firearms bought from unlicensed dealers at gun shows.

It also contains a bill announced by Connecticut’s senators last week that would bar gun sales until background checks are complete. Under current law, if a background check is not completed within 72 hours, the sale can be consummated.

Gun Owners of America, one of the nation’s largest gun-rights organizations, agrees, said Larry Pratt, executive director of the group, that something needs to be done to stop mass shootings.

“Congress must act,” he said in an email to WND. “Away with Gun-Free School Zones. Such zones have been the site of all but two of the mass murders in the U.S. since 1950. We join with our Dear Leader in calling for Congress to act.”

Any other type of action would be irresponsible, ineffective and mere pandering to the Democrat base, he said.

Unwelcome in Roseburg?

Meanwhile, it could be a chilly welcome for President Obama when he arrives Friday in Roseburg, Oregon, where many residents believe he is coming to their town solely to politicize the tragic shooting at their local community college.

David Jacques, publisher of the Roseburg Beacon, told Bill O’Reilly Monday the people of Roseburg would not welcome Obama if he came to town to politicize the funerals of the Umpqua College shooting victims.

Chris Harper-Mercer, the 24-year-old son of a white man and black woman who was born in Britain, gunned down eight students and a teacher last week.

Jacques said he is not the only one who is less than excited about the arrival of the president. Community leaders, including Douglas County commissioners, the police chief and local sheriff feel the same way, he said. They do not want Obama to grandstand in Roseburg for political gain on the issue of gun control.

In fact, several thousand people have signed up to attend a rally to protest Obama on Friday. The rally is being organized by a Facebook group called “Not Welcome: Defend Roseburg, Deny Barack Obama.”

According to Douglas County Commissioner Chris Boice, the Umpqua College hero who helped stop the shooter is among those who does not want to see Obama. Chris Mintz, 30, was shot seven times after he jumped into action to save the lives of fellow classmates. He is recovering in a local hospital.

According to Boice:

“I was fortunate enough to go in and visit with Chris Mintz and hear his story and what an amazing young man, just an extremely humble individual. And, when I mentioned to him that the president is coming he was not real excited about getting involved in the political part of this thing either, but humbled by the fact that the president of the United States would be interested in coming to visit him. … My understanding is he hasn’t spoken with anyone from the White House yet and he’s not really interested in doing that. I’m not sure where that stands as off this minute.”

Democrat 'incensed' at lack of action on gun control. Sen Chris Murphy, D-Conn., was "incensed" at the press conference last week when he unveiled his legislation with fellow Connecticut Democrat Sen. Richard Blumenthal, according to Time.

"Congress has become an accomplice in these murders," Murphy said. "We are quietly endorsing this mass slaughter by refusing to act … I don’t care how many members of Congress send out tweets saying they're sorry. You aren’t sorry, you aren't truly sympathetic if you're not willing to act."

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., sees it differently.

Paul argued against making schools gun-free zones, and said schools would fare better if they put stickers on their windows warning potential gunmen to proceed at their peril.

Paul spoke with Iowa radio host Jan Mickelson Tuesday and said it's "sad" how Obama has tried to make the Oregon shooting about guns.

He said the problem is mental illness and that "people are going to places where guns are prohibited."

Paul said it’s also quite possible that a falloff in basic morality is what's behind many of the shootings. He said America was lacking "a certain belief in right and wrong, a certain Christian foundation or religious foundation to our country."

As he has done after past mass shootings, immediately after Thursday's shooting, Obama called for "common sense" gun control measures. That did not resonate with some Roseburg-area residents.

Roseburg residents weigh in

"We do not want him to come, and the veterans don’t want him to come," Patti Sciapiti, who said her husband is involved with the American Legion in Roseburg, told the Register-Guard.

"I don’t want him here because I don’t think it was proper for him to talk about gun control when the tragedy was just happening," Sciapiti told the local newspaper from the parking lot at Mercy Medical Center. "He politicized it; he even said he politicized it. That's just not right. ... He's not welcome."

One man who said he is a military veteran and provided only his first name, Dave, said he doesn't plan to try to see Obama on the visit, calling him "a jerk."

"They have laws on the books now that cover gun control," he said. "They don’t need any more because they already have them. All they got to do is enforce them."

Roseburg is a conservative area more than 160 miles outside of Portland. In 2012, Douglas County residents favored GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney over Obama 61 percent to 34 percent.

The county has 25,751 registered Republican voters and 16,474 registered Democrats, according to the county elections office, the Register reported.

Obama plans to visit Roseburg on Friday during a four-day West Coast visit that had already been scheduled. He is not holding a public event, but rather plans to meet privately with the families of those killed, the White House said.

Roseburg resident Chanty Lytsell offered conditional support for Obama’s visit. Lytsell told the Register she doesn’t object to Obama coming to offer his support to grieving families. But if he is coming to start a political debate, she said, “Don’t bother."

"I can see that he’s coming here maybe because of the fact that he wants to be supportive of our city. But it doesn’t really feel that way,” Lytsell said. “I feel like it’s another political scheme for him. Our town has gone through a lot already, and I don’t think we need the president here for his support.

"We support each other as a community, and that’s what’s important in our community, and we need our time to grieve," she said. "We don't need to listen to what his views are on gun control. That is not what we need to talk about right now."

City releases statement in support of visit

While many residents, the county commissioners and sheriff are on record against the president's visit, the mayor and city council of Roseburg are throwing their arms wide open to embrace him.

"We wish to be clear that Mayor (Larry) Rich, City Council President (Tom) Ryan and the Roseburg City Council welcome the president to Roseburg and will extend him every courtesy," the city said in a statement.

Rod Cotton, a lifelong resident of Roseburg, has lived in the neighborhood directly across from the UCC campus for 25 years. He said he doesn’t mind if the president comes to visit but hopes Obama will narrow the focus of his visit.

"He is the president of the United States, and there are many of his policies that I don’t agree with, but he has every right to come,” Cotton, who describes himself as a political conservative, told the Register-Guard. "There's a lot of negative out there from folks who I don’t think really represent the community as a whole. I think he's sincere about coming to grieve with the folks."

Kimberly Roberts — who attends UCC but was not on campus when the shooting occurred — told the newspaper she believes the president committed a faux pas by politicizing the issue.

"He turned it into such a controversy, and that’s not very intelligent because this community is full of a lot of gun-carrying people," she said. "People are hunters. That’s how they survive. That’s how they live."
 

 

http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/dems-issue-flurry-of-new-gun-control-bills/ 

 

 

 

TRAMPLING THE NATURAL RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE

Hillary would render the Second Amendment a useless dead letter

Andrew P. Napolitano

Wednesday, October 7, 2015 

While the FBI continued to analyze the emails Hillary Rodham Clinton thought she deleted and her advisers pressed her to hire a Republican criminal defense attorney in Washington, a madman used a lawfully purchased handgun to kill a professor and eight students at a community college in Roseburg, Ore. Looking to change the subject away from her emails, Mrs. Clinton was quick to pounce.

She who has ripped into Republicans for seeking political gain from the four American deaths in Benghazi now seeks her own political gain from the dozens of murdered children and young adults in Newtown, Conn., and Roseburg. On the heels of the latter and referring to both tragedies, she launched an emotional attack early this week on the two most recent Supreme Court decisions upholding the personal right to keep and bear arms. She offered to “fix” them should she be elected president.

Her so-called fix consists of a dead-on-arrival

legislative proposal making gun manufacturers financially liable for the misuse of their products and an executive order determining the meaning of certain words used in federal statutes.

The liability-shifting proposal is akin to punishing General Motors whenever a drunken driver misuses his Chevy and injures someone. The courts would surely reject that.
The executive order proposal assaults the Constitution. 

Those in the gun sale business must conduct background checks via computer services offered by the FBI. The background checks look for reports of crimes of violence, domestic violence and mental illness. Private people who occasionally sell their hardware or give guns as gifts are exempt from conducting background checks.

Mrs. Clinton would create a presidentially written and mandated definition of occasional sales and gifts so as to require background checks for all gun transfers — a requirement Congress rejected.

We are 13 months from Election Day 2016, and Mrs. Clinton has already promised that she would rule by pen and phone rather than govern by consensus.

As a lawyer, Mrs. Clinton should know that only the federal courts — not the president — can decide what statutory language means. Moreover, if she knew anything about FBI background checks, she would know that they are only as good as the database on which they rely. If a madman hides his mental illness, no database will reveal it.

Her attacks on the Supreme Court decisions were direct. She rejects their characterization of the right to keep and bear arms as a fundamental right — meaning that it is akin to thought, speech, press, association, worship and travel.

Yet if she were to become president, she would take an oath to uphold the Constitution; that means the Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court. The presidential oath of office would require that she execute her duties “faithfully — whether she agrees with the law or constitutional provision or not. She apparently has no intention of fulfilling the presidential oath of office.

We are 13 months from Election Day 2016, and Mrs. Clinton has already promised that she would not enforce Supreme Court decisions with which she disagrees.

What did both the Newtown and the Roseburg tragedies have in common? Both murderers were madmen. Yet neither had a record of mental illness, so the background checks the anti-self-defense lobby loves would not have prevented either of these killers from buying a gun and using it to murder indiscriminately. 

If killers are prepared to murder innocent children, does Mrs. Clinton really think they would obey the laws regulating gun ownership?

Both mass murders occurred in no-gun zones. A no-gun zone is the most dangerous place on the planet when a madman intent on killing enters. No-gun zones are arbitrarily designated on public property by local authorities, stripping law-abiding folks of their lawfully owned guns — their natural right to self-defense — and exposing them to terror and death.

The Constitution does not permit public no-gun zones any more than it does public no-free-speech zones. If the right to keep and bear arms is truly fundamental, the government cannot interfere with it based on geography. 

If the Army veteran-college student who stopped seven bullets with his body last week and saved the lives of his classmates (and survived!) had been permitted to carry a gun into the school building, the madman who murdered nine innocents would have been stopped long before police arrived — long before he completed his killings.

The right to keep and bear arms has more than just the Second Amendment to protect it. By characterizing the right as fundamental and pre-political, the high court accepted the truism that this right is merely a modern extension of the ancient right to self-defense. And the right to defend oneself does not come from the government; it comes from our humanity. It is a natural right.

Who among us, when confronted with the terror of nearly certain annihilation, would concern himself with the niceties of the law? Life itself is at stake. The right to self-defense is a manifestation of the natural instinct for survival, borne in the hearts of all rational people.

But Hillary Rodham Clinton rejects that instinct because she prefers we become dependent upon the government — as long as she is running it.

The police cannot stop mass killings because they cannot be everywhere all the time. And madmen willing to kill do not fear being lawbreakers. 

Guns in the hands of the people give not only tyrants second thoughts, but also madmen.

Even madmen fear an early death.

• Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is a contributor to The Washington Times and Fox News. He is the author of seven books on the U.S. Constitution.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/7/andrew-napolitano-hillary-clinton-would-crush-seco/

EXCLUSIVE: U.S. officials conclude Iran deal violates federal law

Some senior U.S. officials involved in the implementation of the Iran nuclear deal have privately concluded that a key sanctions relief provision – a concession to Iran that will open the doors to tens of billions of dollars in U.S.-backed commerce with the Islamic regime – conflicts with existing federal statutes and cannot be implemented without violating those laws, Fox News has learned.

At issue is a passage tucked away in ancillary paperwork attached to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, as the Iran nuclear deal is formally known. Specifically, Section 5.1.2 of Annex II provides that in exchange for Iranian compliance with the terms of the deal, the U.S. “shall…license non-U.S. entities that are owned or controlled by a U.S. person to engage in activities with Iran that are consistent with this JCPOA.”

In short, this means that foreign subsidiaries of U.S. parent companies will, under certain conditions, be allowed to do business with Iran. The problem is that theIran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act (ITRA), signed into law by President Obama in August 2012, was explicit in closing the so-called “foreign sub” loophole.

Indeed, ITRA also stipulated, in Section 218, that when it comes to doing business with Iran, foreign subsidiaries of U.S. parent firms shall in all cases be treated exactly the same as U.S. firms: namely, what is prohibited for U.S. parent firms has to be prohibited for foreign subsidiaries, and what is allowed for foreign subsidiaries has to be allowed for U.S. parent firms.

What’s more, ITRA contains language, in Section 605, requiring that the terms spelled out in Section 218 shall remain in effect until the president of the United States certifies two things to Congress: first, that Iran has been removed from the State Department’s list of nations that sponsor terrorism, and second, that Iran has ceased the pursuit, acquisition, and development of weapons of mass destruction.

Additional executive orders and statutes signed by President Obama, such as the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, have reaffirmed that all prior federal statutes relating to sanctions on Iran shall remain in full effect.

For example, the review act – sponsored by Sens. Bob Corker (R-Tennessee) and Ben Cardin (D-Maryland), the chairman and ranking member, respectively, of the Foreign Relations Committee, and signed into law by President Obama in May – stated that “any measure of statutory sanctions relief” afforded to Iran under the terms of the nuclear deal may only be “taken consistent with existing statutory requirements for such action.” The continued presence of Iran on the State Department’s terror list means that “existing statutory requirements” that were set forth in ITRA, in 2012, have not been met for Iran to receive the sanctions relief spelled out in the JCPOA.

As the Iran deal is an “executive agreement” and not a treaty – and has moreover received no vote of ratification from the Congress, explicit or symbolic – legal analysts inside and outside of the Obama administration have concluded that the JCPOA is vulnerable to challenge in the courts, where federal case law had held that U.S. statutes trump executive agreements in force of law.

Administration sources told Fox News it is the intention of Secretary of State John Kerry, who negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran’s foreign minister and five other world powers, that the re-opening of the “foreign sub” loophole by the JCPOA is to be construed as broadly as possible by lawyers for the State Department, the Treasury Department and other agencies involved in the deal’s implementation.

But the apparent conflict between the re-opening of the loophole and existing U.S. law leaves the Obama administration with only two options going forward. The first option is to violate ITRA, and allow foreign subsidiaries to be treated differently than U.S. parent firms. The second option is to treat both categories the same, as ITRA mandated – but still violate the section of ITRA that required Iran’s removal from the State Department terror list as a pre-condition of any such licensing.

It would also renege on the many promises of senior U.S. officials to keep the broad array of American sanctions on Iran in place. Chris Backemeyer, who served as Iran director for the National Security Council from 2012 to 2014 and is now the State Department’s deputy coordinator for sanctions policy, toldPOLITICO last month “there will be no real sanctions relief of our primary embargo….We are still going to have sanctions on Iran that prevent most Americans from…engaging in most commercial activities.”

Likewise, in a speech at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy last month, Adam Szubin, the acting under secretary of Treasury for terrorism and financial crimes, described Iran as “the world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism” and said existing U.S. sanctions on the regime “will continue to be enforced….U.S. investment in Iran will be prohibited across the board.”

Nominated to succeed his predecessor at Treasury, Szubin appeared before the Senate Banking Committee for a confirmation hearing the day after his speech to the Washington Institute. At the hearing, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) asked the nominee where the Obama administration finds the “legal underpinnings” for using the JCPOA to re-open the “foreign sub” loophole.

Szubin said the foreign subsidiaries licensed to do business with Iran will have to meet “some very difficult conditions,” and he specifically cited ITRA, saying the 2012 law “contains the licensing authority that Treasury would anticipate using…to allow for certain categories of activity for those foreign subsidiaries.”

Elsewhere, in documents obtained by Fox News, Szubin has maintained that a different passage of ITRA, Section 601, contains explicit reference to an earlier law – the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, on the books since 1977 – and states that the president “may exercise all authorities” embedded in IEEPA, which includes licensing authority for the president.

However, Section 601 is also explicit on the point that the president must use his authorities from IEEPA to “carry out” the terms and provisions of ITRA itself, including Section 218 – which mandated that, before this form of sanctions relief can be granted, Iran must be removed from the State Department’s terror list. Nothing in the Congressional Record indicates that, during debate and passage of ITRA, members of Congress intended for the chief executive to use Section 601 to overturn, rather than “carry out,” the key provisions of his own law.

One administration lawyer contacted by Fox News said the re-opening of the loophole reflects circular logic with no valid legal foundation. “It would be Alice-in-Wonderland bootstrapping to say that [Section] 601 gives the president the authority to restore the foreign subsidiary loophole – the exact opposite of what the statute ordered,” said the attorney, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations over implementation of the Iran deal.

At the State Department on Thursday, spokesman John Kirby told reporters Secretary Kerry is “confident” that the administration “has the authority to follow through on” the commitment to re-open the foreign subsidiary loophole.

“Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the president has broad authorities, which have been delegated to the secretary of the Treasury, to license activities under our various sanctions regimes, and the Iran sanctions program is no different,” Kirby said.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the G.O.P. presidential candidate who is a Harvard-trained lawyer and ardent critic of the Iran deal, said the re-opening of the loophole fits a pattern of the Obama administration enforcing federal laws selectively.

“It’s a problem that the president doesn’t have the ability wave a magic wand and make go away,” Cruz told Fox News in an interview. “Any U.S. company that follows through on this, that allows their foreign-owned subsidiaries to do business with Iran, will very likely face substantial civil liability, litigation and potentially even criminal prosecution. The obligation to follow federal law doesn’t go away simply because we have a lawless president who refuses to acknowledge or follow federal law.”

A spokesman for the Senate Banking Committee could not offer any time frame as to when the committee will vote on Szubin’s nomination.