Sunday, July 8, 2012

OBAMA'S 'MISSING YEAR' AT COLUMBIA FOUND?

NEW YORK – Two separate database reports from the National Student Clearinghouse last year that contradicted President Obama’s claim he attended Columbia University for two years added to the intrigue generated by Obama’s unwillingness to discuss his time at the Ivy League institution, his block on the release of educational records, and the many political science students and faculty there in the early 1980s who say they don’t remember him.
Swirling amid the black hole of information are a host of theories about Obama’s whereabouts – particularly during the 1981-1982 school year – including speculation he was working for the CIA in Pakistan.
Now, the clearinghouse, with permission from Columbia, has decided to make an exception to its media policy and address WND’s inquiry into the discrepancy. Why do clearinghouse records indicate Obama was at the school only during the 1982-83 school year while Obama and Columbia’s spokesman have insisted he began attending the New York City school in the fall of 1981?
Janine Greenwood, vice president and general counsel for the clearinghouse, told WND there was a “computer error” in their system that has been corrected. She said she confirmed with Columbia that Obama was at the university for two academic years, not one.
Greenwood said she “tried to untangle this” discrepancy one year ago after two “DegreeVerify certificates” from the Herndon, Va.-based clearinghouse –obtained through a fee-based request – indicated Obama attended Columbia College at Columbia University only in the 1982-1983 academic year, from Sept. 1, 1982 until May 31, 1983, receiving a Bachelor of Arts degree May 17, 1983.
“All I know is [the record] was right originally, and somewhere along the line it went off the rails, and then it was right again,” she said.
“We basically had two records running simultaneously, and it just depended on how you input the name and the other information as to which records you got,” she explained to WND in an interview Friday.
Greenwood confirmed a disclaimer on the clearinghouse website stating the organization relies on the accuracy of the information supplied by each educational institution and cannot edit, modify or delete any student degree or enrollment data.
Founded in 1993, the clearinghouse describes itself as “the nation’s trusted source for education verification and student educational outcomes research.” Participating colleges and universities provide the clearinghouse with enrollment and degree information on their students and authorize it to respond on their behalf for degree confirmation in conformity with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974.
The two separate reports indicating Obama attended Columbia for only one year were generated in March 2011. One, obtained by lawyer Orly Taitz, was used in a court filing contesting Obama’s eligibility. The other found its way to Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigating Obama’s eligibility for the presidential ballot in Arizona.
Greenwood said at least one of the two people who submitted the request for a report of Obama’s record received a correct report as well as an incorrect one. She added that the people who obtained the records probably violated the clearinghouse’s terms of use, because acquisition of records is limited to degree confirmation for the purposes of employment and education.
She said she contacted the Columbia registrar’s office last year to clear up the discrepancy.
“We have confirmed with Columbia that the two years was the correct record,” she said.
Columbia University
However, Columbia’s top media spokesman – who says the issue of Obama’s attendance at the university is his “beat,” as all questions on the matter are routed to him – told WND a day before the interview with Greenwood that he couldn’t explain why the database reports indicated Obama attended Columbia only one year. Robert Hornsby said he was unaware of any contact between Columbia and the National Student Clearinghouse regarding the discrepancy.
After the interview Friday with Greenwood, WND asked Hornsby in a follow-up email to confirm that he had no knowledge of the fact that the clearinghouse says it resolved the issue one year ago.
Hornsby confirmed he was unaware of the contact but insisted “that does not alter the facts, which are clear.”
In the Thursday interview, Hornsby said regarding the clearinghouse’s information: “I don’t know what they’re basing their information on or what their system is for logging, but I can confirm, as a matter of fact, that President Obama was here in September 1981 as a transfer student from Occidental.”
Asked whether he had personally seen a transcript that would verify Obama attended classes during the 1981-82 school year, Hornsby said, “You’re looking for proof I cannot provide.”
He noted academic records are protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, “and we don’t talk about any student’s records academic records, presidents or otherwise.”
Hornsby said his information is based on confirmation from “people that have the authority” in the registrar’s office.
“I can’t help you by giving you some more solid thing about having seen a transcript or anything like that,” he told WND. “Our records show he was here, and that’s what we’re standing by. I don’t really have anything else to say.”
Obama’s autobiography “Dreams from My Father,” the Columbia University website and two best-selling biographies by authors favorably disposed to the president all assert Obama attended Columbia for two years, from 1981 to 1983.
Unlike previous presidents, however, Obama has refused to release any transcripts or other documentation regarding his education, going back to Kindergarten.
Arpaio’s lead investigator in the eligibility probe, Mike Zullo, provided to WND the National Student Clearinghouse report it obtained, which was derived from a paid request to the clearinghouse.
Two weeks ago, WND submitted two paid inquiries – one with the name Barry Soetoro and the other with Barack Hussein Obama – to the National Student Clearinghouse to confirm the previous reports. The clearinghouse acknowledged receipt of the inquiries but gave no further information.
Did he attend classes at Columbia?
Henry Franklin Graff, professor emeritus of history at Columbia for 46 years, has cast doubt on claims Obama attended classes at the New York City university.
Henry Franklin Graff
“I have no recollection of Barack Obama at Columbia, and I am sure he never attended any of my classes,” Graff told WND in a telephone interview.
“For 46 years, I taught political history, diplomatic history and one of the pioneering courses on presidential history, and every future politician of note who went through Columbia in those years took one or more of my classes – every one, that is, except Barack Obama.”
Graff further told WND no professor he knew could remember having Obama as a student at Columbia.
“Nobody I knew at Columbia ever remembers Obama being there,” Graff insisted.
The undocumented student
On Nov. 5, 2008, Columbia University celebrated Obama’s election as president by publishing an article in Columbia News titled “Barack Obama, CC ’83, First Columbia Graduate Elected President of the United States.”
“Obama attended Columbia College from 1981 to 1983, after transferring in his junior year from Occidental College,” the article read in part.
In his 2010 biography of Obama, “The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama,” journalist David Remnick states on pages 112-113 that Obama moved to New York City in the summer of 1981 to co-occupy an apartment at 142 West 109th Street, off Amsterdam Avenue, with Occidental friend Phil Boerner.
Remnick does not provide footnotes to document the claims, however.
Two pages later, Remnick recounts how on the night of Nov. 24, 1982, Obama’s father was killed driving drunk in Nairobi, “during Obama’s first semester of his senior year at Columbia,” with the assumption this was Obama’s second academic year at Columbia.
Remnick footnotes the passage regarding the death of Obama’s father on page 215 with a reference to an article by Jon Meacham titled “On His Own,” published in Newsweek Sept. 1, 2008.
Meacham’s mention of Obama attending Columbia is so limited that he fails to specify the amount of time Obama spent attending classes at the university.
In his 2012 biography of Obama, “Barack Obama: The Story,” author and editor David Maraniss recounts, beginning on page 418, an Obama move to New York City on Aug. 25, 1981, “a week before orientation day at Columbia College.”
David Maraniss
On pages 465-466, Maraniss writes of Obama’s last month at Columbia, May 1983:
[Obama] had received mostly A’s in his coursework during those two years, he said later, and finished with a 3.7 grade point average. Including his two years at Occidental, his college education had cost about fifty thousand dollars for the four years and was a family effort. About half came from scholarships and student loans, a bit from the off-the-books part-time summer jobs, and most of the rest from his grandmother, Tut, who had devoted part of her salary each year to his education.
Although the passage is not accompanied by a footnote, the reference “he said later” suggests Maraniss got the information from Obama himself or from interviews in which Obama presented the information.
The “off-the-books” part-time summer employment is unlikely to be independently verified. Nor does Maraniss produce any Columbia transcript or reference to a transcript that would document the grade-point average. Maraniss also fails to provide or reference any Columbia financial records that might have given insight into the source or sources Obama used to pay tuition.
Columbia: ‘Obama’s lost years’
No less than Obama-supporting Snopes.com has admitted little is known about Obama’s Columbia years.
“Even those who have studied Barack Obama’s background in detail don’t generally know much about his time at Columbia University, however, as he hasn’t revealed much about that period of his life in his public writings and statements, nor has he made his transcripts or other school records from Columbia available for public examination,” the website states.
An editorial titled “Obama’s Lost Years,” published in the Wall Street Journal Sept. 11, 2008, noted Fox News contacted some 400 students who were at Columbia from 1981 to 1983 and found no one who remembered him.
New York Times reporter Janny Scott, who later wrote a favorable biography of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, wrote in an Oct. 30, 2007, story that Obama “declined repeated requests to talk about his New York years, release his Columbia transcript or identify even a single fellow student, co-worker, roommate or friend from those years.”
“He doesn’t remember the names of a lot of people in his life,” said Ben LaBolt, a campaign spokesman, told Scott.
Scott wrote that one person who did remember Obama was Michael L. Baron, who taught a senior seminar on international politics and American policy. Baron said he was Obama’s adviser on the senior thesis for that course and gave him an A for the course. Baron later wrote Obama a recommendation for Harvard Law School.
An Associated Press story May 16, 2008, also stated the Obama campaign declined to discuss Obama’s “time at Columbia and his friendships in general.”
The campaign, however, listed five locations where Obama lived during a period of four years in New York City: three on Manhattan’s Upper West Side and two in Brooklyn. His memoir mentions two others on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, the AP noted.
After Columbia, Obama says he spent two years as a writer for a business newsletter and as a coordinator at City College in Harlem for an environmental and consumer advocacy group. In 1985, he left for Chicago.

5 Natural Blood Thinners Protects Against Strokes


Bye bye Coumadin, so long Plavix - Say hello to five natural blood thinners that protect against strokes and blood clots

Wednesday, April 04, 2012 by: JB Bardot


6,634
(NaturalNews) The November 2011 edition of theNew England Journal of Medicine reports that most emergency hospital visits for the elderly are caused by side effects and overdosing from taking blood thinners to prevent strokes and blood clots. Conventional doctors wait until you're at risk of a stroke or have had your first stroke to prescribe blood thinners in hopes of preventing additional strokes. What they don't warn you about are the serious possible side effects from these drugs including internal bleeding, stomach ulcers, muscle aches and pains, headaches with dizziness, kidney failure and a boat load of other negatives that can destroy your health. However, there are several natural substances that possess powerful anti-inflammatory properties and also help to thin the blood. These herbs can also produce their own side effects and should not be taken in combination with pharmaceutical drugs. Don't take any unfamiliar medicinal herb unless supervised by a well-trained herbalist or natural health practitioner.

Turmeric

Used in Ayurvedic and Traditional Chinese Medicine for thousands of years, the richly golden spice turmeric is hailed for it's ability to reduce pain and inflammation. Recent studies have revealed that its pain-killing properties compare with those of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs; however, turmeric does not cause the internal bleeding and digestive upset or toxicity to the liver that is found in some cases of individuals taking NSAIDs.

Bromelain

Bromelain is an enzyme found in pineapples that also has anti-inflammatory properties and is especially helpful in reducing pain and stiffness associated with arthritis when taken on an empty stomach. Its action is enhanced when taken in combination with turmeric and ginger. Additionally, bromelain is a wonderful digestive enzyme when taken with meals and helps break down proteins, protecting against the formation of uric acid crystals, which are responsible for causing gout and certain types of kidney stones.

Ginger

Ginger is one of the royal ancient spices of India, China and Japan whose action works to reduce inflammation of the joints and muscles as well as strengthening the immune system and reducing digestive upsets and vomiting. Ginger has been used medicinally for thousands of years and is most effective when used raw in a hot tea; however, it is also helpful when taken in powdered supplements.

Garlic

A favorite spice for many people -- and a popular healing agent around the world -- garlic is not only a potent anti-inflammatory herb, but has proven antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral properties. Eating garlic raw or lightly cooked, or making garlic tea are several of the most effective methods for its medicinal use. Odorless, freeze-dried supplements are available for those who prefer to avoid the strong scent on their breath.

Water

Simple, plain and life's staple, water is perhaps one of the best blood thinners available. Allowing yourself to become dehydrated thickens the blood, causing it to clump together and form clots. Drinking enough clear, clean water each day helps keep the blood running smoothly through your circulatory and cardiovascular system, maintaining good health. The ideal daily intake for each individual is 1/2 ounce of water for each pound of body weight; in other words, if you weight 150 pounds, you should ideally drink 75 ounces of water daily.

All of these substances have the power to thin the blood. There are other foods as well, such as vitamins B-6, D and E, omega-3 fatty acids, apple cider vinegar and strawberries that act as blood-thinning agents; and when used judiciously under the supervision of your health practitioner, may keep you healthy longer, prevent strokes and blood clots and help keep you off drugs and out of the hospital.

Sources for this article include:
University of Maryland Medical Center: Turmeric
http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/turmeric-000277.htm

Natural Blood Thinners: Foods that Naturally Thin the Blood
http://www.ctds.info/natthinners.html

Herbs 2000: Bromelain
http://www.herbs2000.com/h_menu/bromelain.htm

Ray Sahelian, M.D.: Bromelain
http://www.raysahelian.com/bromelain.html

VitaminStuff.com: Ginger
http://www.vitaminstuff.com/herbs-ginger.html

University of Maryland Medical Center: Ginger
http://www.umm.edu/altmed/articles/ginger-000246.htm

Kansas State Research and Extension: Herbs -- Garlic
http://university.uog.edu/cals/people/PUBS/Garlic/MF2380.pdf

The New England Journal of Medicine: Emergency Hospitalizations for Adverse Drug Events in Older Americans
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1103053

About the author:
JB Bardot is trained in herbal medicine and homeopathy, and has a post graduate degree in holistic nutrition. Bardot cares for both people and animals, using alternative approaches to health care and lifestyle. She writes about wellness, green living, alternative medicine, holistic nutrition, homeopathy, herbs and naturopathic medicine. READ HER OTHER ARTICLES ON NATURAL NEWS HERE:http://www.naturalnews.com/Author1686.html You can find her on Facebook athttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001364941208&ref=tn_tnmn or on Twitter at jbbardot23 https://twitter.com/#!/jbbard


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/035465_blood_thinners_alternatives_Coumadin.html#ixzz204GgfiSj

Is the gold market rigged?


This is one reason why the average American cannot get ahead with his personal investments.  Everything, everyone, is so corrupt that we are no better than the banana republics!  Another reason is the excessive taxes we pay to be redistributed to others the government deems more worthy.  Go figure!

Is the gold market rigged?

Exclusive: Mark Leibovit on how recent events will affect precious metals

Mark Leibovit, author of the Leibovit VR Gold Letter, was named by Timer Digest as the No. 1 gold market timer for 2011, the No. 1 gold market timer for the 5-year period ending in 2010, and the No. 1 intermediate stock market timer for the 10-year period ending 2007. He served for seven years as a consultant "Elf" on Louis Rukeyser's "Wall Street Week" and over 30 years as a Market Monitor guest for PBS. He has appeared on CNBC, Fox, Bloomberg and others, and been interviewed in Barron’s, Business Week, Forbes and The Wall Street Journal.Less
In my VR Gold Letter, I have recently pointed out the “seasonal” tendency for a rally in July, even though there could also be risk of another sell-off into the fall before the traditional September-to-February bigger seasonal rally. Well, it appears we’re underway.
Interestingly, the confluence of potentially bullish regulatory/political events has helped confirm these positives, most notably the work of Ron Paul, the Barclays Libor scandal and the accusation that JP Morgan has been “manipulating” (suppressing) the silver market for several years. Bringing these events to light might now dramatically change the dynamics of the metals markets – allowing supply and demand, rather than illicit actions, to determine prices.
Market manipulation
One of the biggest issues for the gold and silver markets has been the consistent interference on the part of world governments, especially the U.S. government, in the silver and gold futures markets. Gold is so important that Western central banks – particularly the U.S. Treasury and its Exchange Stabilization Fund, the Federal Reserve and allied central banks – rig the gold market every day, even hour by hour.

Why do they do this? Because gold is a powerful competitive currency that, if allowed to function in a free market, determines the value of other currencies and influences interest rates and the value of government bonds.
So, although “conspiracy theorists” have argued for decades that the gold and silver markets have been manipulated by central governments, it is not conspiracy. It is fact.

GATA to the forefront
The work of Bill Murphy and Chris Powell at the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, or GATA, has been invaluable in seeking out the truth. To obtain proof of its allegations, GATA has sued central banks and particularly the U.S. Federal Reserve, against which in 2011 it won a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit produced a written admission by a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Kevin M. Warsh, that the Fed has secret gold-swap arrangements with foreign banks and that the Fed cannot ever permit these gold-swap arrangements to become public. Interestingly, last December, soon after resigning from the Fed’s Board of Governors, Warsh wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal complaining about the new central bank policy called “financial repression.” He asserted that government policymakers now are “finding it tempting to pursue ‘financial repression’ – suppressing market prices that they don’t like.”

GATA also has proven gold-market manipulation by examining trading data, most notably in a study by its board member and market analyst Adrian Douglas showing that, as GATA says, “the gold price during trading in the London market has gone down steadily for 10 years even as the worldwide gold price has gone up steadily in that time. That is, anyone buying gold on the opening of the London market and selling it on the close every day over the last decade would have lost a huge amount of money even as the gold price rose steadily around the world.

According to GATA:
“… [R]igging the gold market is part of a general scheme by which a secretive and unelected elite in the United States controls the value of all capital, labor, goods, and services in the world – controls the value of everything.
But the mainstream financial news media in the West refuse to examine the documentation of this scheme and to put critical questions to central banks. Indeed, the first rule of financial journalism in the West is that central banks cannot and must not be questioned. This is now changing. As central banks intervene more and more to defeat markets, this rule makes most Western financial journalism simply irrelevant. But the purpose of all this market rigging is to suppress not only the prices of gold but to suppress commodity prices generally. How about crude oil or copper? It is just the latest manifestation of the everlasting war of the highest levels of the financial class against the producing class, only this time the producing class hasn’t yet figured out what’s going on. Most tragically, much of the gold-mining industry itself doesn’t understand what is being done to it – doesn’t understand that it’s not just digging metal out of the ground, but minting money and competing with all other issuers of money and that this competition is far more cutthroat than imagined.
 
Ron Paul to the rescue

Recently, the U.S. House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform unanimously passed Rep. Ron Paul’s “Audit the Fed” bill, H.R. 459, with all the important audit provisions intact. According to Ron Paul, this victory “clears the way for a House floor vote expected sometime in late July, and with a whopping 263 co-sponsors, the chances of it passing have never looked better! This is an unprecedented opportunity for transparency into how the currency of the United States is handled, and mishandled, by the Federal Reserve. It is more important than ever that my colleagues in the House and Senate understand what this legislation does and why it is so important.”

The passage of this bill would also bring us one step closer to bringing daylight to the rigging of the financial markets – including gold. As Ron Paul said, “H.R. 459 does not limit the focus of the audit, making a full audit finally possible. An entity that controls the value and purchasing power of the dollar should not be permitted to operate in the dark without oversight by Congress and accountability to the people.”

Barclays opened Pandora’s box
Barclays, the British banking giant, agreed to pay $450 million to U.S. and U.K. regulators as part of a settlement regarding its attempts to manipulate the Libor, or “London interbank offered rate.” The world’s most important interest-rate benchmark, Libor governs approximately $10 trillion in loans – including credit card rates, adjustable rate mortgages, student loans and auto loans, plus a monumental $350 trillion in derivatives.

As part of the settlement, Barclays will admit failings. If the $350 trillion Libor market is subject to manipulation, certainly the gold and silver markets could be as well. It’s actually a shocking thing when you think about it, but I like to relate it to the gold and silver markets. These people messed around with Libor, and there’s some suggestion that the Bank of England might have thought this was a good idea when things were looking particularly dark in late 2008. The rigging may now be coming to an end because the Bank of England, to save face, is turning its back on Barclays, the company that did its bidding. Barclays published documents indicating that some executives thought they were responding to an implied directive from the Britain’s central bank.

When Barclays bank manipulated key interest rates to bolster profits during the 2008 financial crisis, senior executives said they were following a common practice that regulators implicitly approved, according to documents released by the bank and authorities. Robert Diamond, Barclays’ chief executive (like Jaime Dimon at JP Morgan Chase) has now become the target for further scrutiny and, hopefully, revelation.

The Telegraph of London reported July 7 that “Barclays stepped up its efforts to rig interest rates after its chief executive personally spoke to the deputy governor of the Bank of England. The scandal has claimed its first scalp among the senior management of Barclays, as the bank confirmed on Sunday that Marcus Agius, its chairman, was set to resign.”

Barclays, in its defense, said it not only advised the Bank of England and other British authorities about interest rate discrepancies across Wall Street, but also the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Wall Street firms weren’t told to stop the practice, Barclays said.

The back-and-forth illustrates the tangled web of relationships on Wall Street, where authorities and bankers maintain close ties. Despite the troubling acknowledgments from the bank, regulators didn’t put an immediate halt to the practice. Some executives said they thought regulators had been encouraging the actions.

JP Morgan’s dirty tricks?
As we know, JP Morgan Chase and its CEO, Jaime Dimon, are also under scrutiny for the recent $9 billion trading loss by an institution that is not supposed to be a hedge fund. But, were they doing the government’s bidding as well? I suspect yes! Back in May 2010, the New York Post exposed JP Morgan’s manipulation of the silver market when it reported an ongoing investigation by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice into JP Morgan’s silver trading.
If that’s not enough, Reuters reported July 3 that “U.S. energy regulators have subpoenaed JPMorgan Chase & Co. to produce 25 internal emails as part of an investigation into whether the bank manipulated electricity markets in California and the Midwest.”
Either JP Morgan Chase is behaving idiotically or it is working under the cover of government protection. I favor the later scenario. Short term it may be successful, but long-term government interference in the free marketplace invariably fails and blows up.

Summary
Ron Paul’s success in the House of Representatives opening up the Fed, the disclosures at Barclays implying government involvement and the scrutiny of JP Morgan Chase both for its recent loss and previous questionable activities in the silver and electricity markets all bring in the light of day. We know vampires do not like that light. If the banks freeze these illicit activities, markets may actually be able to trade freely, allowing gold and silver to rise to their proper – and higher – levels going forward.
(Editor’s note: Mark Leibovit is one of the world’s top-rated gold timers and helps investors anticipate and benefit from the ups and downs of the precious metals markets with his Leibovit VR Gold Letter, available at a huge discount through WND.)

The Lost Horizons News for July 6, 2012

If you listen to the entire Loftus interview, you will hear him say that he has the very highest security clearances, and he has had access to significant highly-classified information not previously known to the public.

He does not condemn Islam generally – only the Muslim Brotherhood, which is not true Islam. He makes a very strong case that the Muslim Brotherhood has been a Nazi organization from the beginning.

As to the CIA, it is a bit complicated. It seems that there are two organizations within the CIA, one of which is dominated by Nazis who were secretly allowed to immigrate to the U.S. There are numerous other sources confirming that many Nazis were secretly allowed to immigrate to the U.S. There is even a well-documented report available on the internet indicating that George Bush Sr. is an imposter whose real name is George H. Scherff Jr., a German Nazi; and that Barbara Bush was his German girlfriend. Most people do not know that Barbara Bush has a strange unexplained fluency in the German language.

Here are several links containing this information:




The major Wall Street financiers were involved in financing Nazi Germany.  They were positioned to  make a lot of money no matter who won the war. The Bushes and the Walkers (ancestor of George Herbert Walker Bush) are among these traitors and should be arrested. Averill Harriman, the Dulles brothers, Henry Kissinger, and many others are/were traitors and should be immediately arrested if they are still alive.

John Loftus reveals that numerous American and British financiers actually relocated to Germany during the war in order to serve the Third Reich.  They were arrested after the war (over one hundred of them)  insisting defiantly that they would be taken care of by J.P. Morgan and the Wall Street bankers, and would soon be released. They were  incarcerated in a secret prison known as “Ashcan-Dustbin”, but were eventually released without prosecution. Every one of them should have been hanged for treason, but the secrets they could have exposed would have brought down both the British and American governments, so they got off Scot free.

Much of this is in the video.

I have ordered the Loftus book (“America’s Nazi Secret”) and will read it carefully.

I also happen to have done a lot of investigation into the situation in China during and after WWII. It is a long story, but the bottom line is that the leftists who infested the U.S. government in the 30s and 40s were directly responsible for the tragic takeover of China by Mao’s forces. This conclusion is well-documented in the masterpiece book by Chang Jung titled  “Mao – The Untold Story”. This should be accompanied by some reading on the activities of General Stillwell and General Chennault during the war. Suffice it to say that General Chennault (founder of the Flying Tigers) was the true patriot.

Chennault was fired by Truman, only months before the Japanese surrender, for his political courage in his repeated warnings to his superiors in Washington about the danger to China posed by the Communists. And General Stillwell, despite his West Point background and his fluency in Mandarin Chinese, was no friend of China. Yet Stillwell was invited to the Japanese surrender ceremony in Tokyo on the deck of the USS Missouri, but Chennault was not invited. And as Chennault had warned, Mao soon took control of China with help from the U.S. government.

Mao’s reign in China produce untold tragedies for the Chinese people, including (according to Chang Jung) direct responsibility for the deaths of at least 70 million Chinese people.

Yet many members of the current administration are unabashed admirers of Chairman Mao, including Obama’s eligibility attorney Robert Bauer, his wife Anita Dunn (Mao is her “favorite political philosopher”), Obama’s sponsor and ghost author William “The Bomber” Ayers, and his wife (and Weather Underground founder) Bernardine Dohrn. These people are all Communists. What has happened to our country?  How can we have self-described Communists in the White House?

Many people do not realize that leftists, progressives, socialists, Nazis, and Communists all share the same obsession with government control of every source of political power. They certainly do not believe that individuals have rights granted by their Creator.

They do not rest until their power is absolute. Then the monster they created inevitably destroys the very people who created the monster.

It now appears that virtually the entire Democratic Party subscribes to this political philosophy, and that to them, the United States Constitution is an obstacle, not something to be revered and honored. And remember that the very name “Nazi” means “National Socialist”.

So I think it is very dangerous to embrace the Muslim Brotherhood. And I would not accept at face value anything published on Wikipedia. While much information on Wikipedia is very useful, it is controlled by leftists and any information in Wikipedia on certain topics (such as MB) is highly suspect. The same applies to the BBC.

A much more reliable source of information on national security topics is Trevor Loudon, a New Zealander who is an international expert on the Communist menace to America. He travels to the U.S. frequently, and some of his presentations have disclosed absolutely shocking information which he has uncovered.

Here is a link to a recent video by Trevor Loudon:
“Trevor Loudon Traces Obama's Communist Background from Hawaii to Columbia”
Trevor Loudon has posted on his blog a ten-part video series on the Muslim Brotherhood narrated by Frank Gaffney, former Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Reagan.

Part one opens with the title “The Enemy Within”:


Here is an index of articles on Trevor’s site which include mention of the Muslim Brotherhood:


I hope this is helpful. I would not like to see you lose potential believers in your work as a result of an unfortunate reference indicating sympathy for the Muslim Brotherhood.

In fact, I will not be able to forward your messages as long as the reference cited remains. I am of the firm and irrevocable belief that the Muslim Brotherhood is a serious threat to the national security of the United States.