Saturday, July 21, 2012

The Colorado "Batman" shootings

This is my own take on the shootings based upon statements by Mayor Bloomberg and several prominent Democrats shortly after the occurance, and due to the planned submission of the UN Small Arms Treaty for ratification by the Senate on July 27th.  It is possible that this individual MAY have been a person that was a product of the government "mind control" program that have certain code words imbedded into their psyche that when repeated to them makes them an active subject.  Following the shootings many liberal medias came out blaming the TEA Party  as the did when Gabriel Giffords was shot, but moreso were the calls for gun control. With all the shootings in Chicago totalling more than the deaths in Afghanistan has not stirred any call for gun control. With more and more displeasure with the government on the rise, I believe the government itself is becoming afraid of the citizens rising up so want to abridge their 2nd Amendment rights. As some have said that one person with a "right to carry" permit would have been able to stop this shooter as did the old man where two punks tried to rob that internet cafe. This very well could be a "False Flag" event in order to create an outrage among the people to make them ameanable to accept the UN Small Arms Treaty being pushed by Hillary Clinton and Obama as part of the UN and New World Order. Remember if you disarm the people who are NOT committing only makes them more susceptible to criminals who will not care about obeying the law and will still have weapons not to mention what could be an over bearing government. Remember the survey taken on the military as to whether they would fire on the American citizens to which almost all said, NO! It is strange that they would have even polled them on the issue.  The following quotes come mainly from our forefathers who gave us the "Right To Bear Arms" and the 2nd Amendment while some are from a more modern time. As you read them you can see that they were fearful of an over bearing government and refer to countries that do not have that right to protect themselves from criminals and government.

"On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." (Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, June 12, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322)

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been recognized by the General Government; but the best security of that right after all is, the military spirit, that taste for martial exercises, which has always distinguished the free citizens of these States....Such men form the best barrier to the liberties of America" - (Gazette of the United States, October 14, 1789.)

"No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." (Thomas Jefferson, Proposal Virginia Constitution, 1 T. Jefferson Papers, 334,[C.J.Boyd, Ed., 1950])

"The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country..." (James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434 [June 8, 1789])

"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." (Richard Henry Lee, Additional Letters from the Federal Farmer (1788) at 169)

"What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty.... Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." (Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment [ I Annals of Congress at 750 {August 17, 1789}])

"...to disarm the people - that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 380)

"Americans have the right and advantage of being armed - unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (James Madison, The Federalist Papers #46 at 243-244)

"the ultimate authority ... resides in the people alone," (James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in Federalist Paper #46.)

"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States" (Noah Webster in `An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution', 1787, a pamphlet aimed at swaying Pennsylvania toward ratification, in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at 56(New York, 1888))

"...if raised, whether they could subdue a Nation of freemen, who know how to prize liberty, and who have arms in their hands?" (Delegate Sedgwick, during the Massachusetts Convention, rhetorically asking if an oppressive standing army could prevail, Johnathan Elliot, ed., Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, Vol.2 at 97 (2d ed., 1888))

"...but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights..." (Alexander Hamilton speaking of standing armies in Federalist 29.)

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." (James Madison, author of the Bill of Rights, in Federalist Paper No. 46.)

"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." (Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym `A Pennsylvanian' in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1)

"Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state government, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people" (Tench Coxe, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788)

"The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both." [William Rawle, A View of the Constitution 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829)

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for few public officials." (George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 425-426)

"The Constitution shall never be construed....to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms" (Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 86-87)

"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them." (Richard Henry Lee, 1788, Initiator of the Declaration of Independence, and member of the first Senate, which passed the Bill of Rights, Walter Bennett, ed., Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republican, at 21,22,124 (Univ. of Alabama Press,1975)..)

"The great object is that every man be armed" and "everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution. Debates and other Proceedings of the Convention of Virginia,...taken in shorthand by David Robertson of Petersburg, at 271, 275 2d ed. Richmond, 1805. Also 3 Elliot, Debates at 386)

"The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full possession of them." (Zachariah Johnson, 3 Elliot, Debates at 646)

"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?" (Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836)

"The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." (Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers at 184-8)

"That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms..." (Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Peirce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850))

"And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms....The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants" (Thomas Jefferson in a letter to William S. Smith in 1787. Taken from Jefferson, On Democracy 20, S. Padover ed., 1939)

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined" (Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836)

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- (Thomas Jefferson)

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence ... >From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that is good" (George Washington)

"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks. (Thomas Jefferson, Encyclopedia of T. Jefferson, 318 [Foley, Ed., reissued 1967])

"The supposed quietude of a good mans allures the ruffian; while on the other hand, arms like laws discourage and keep the invader and the plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. The same balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside...Horrid mischief would ensue were one half the world deprived of the use of them..." (Thomas Paine, I Writings of Thomas Paine at 56 [1894])

"...the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms" (from article in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette June 18, 1789 at 2, col.2,)

"Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people." (Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697])

"No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion." (James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775])

"Men that are above all Fear, soon grow above all Shame." (John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, Cato's Letters: Or, Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects [London, 1755])

"The difficulty here has been to persuade the citizens to keep arms, not to prevent them from being employed for violent purposes." (Dwight, Travels in New-England)

"What country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." (Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, Dec. 20, 1787, in Papers of Jefferson, ed. Boyd et al.)

(The American Colonies were) "all democratic governments, where the power is in the hands of the people and where there is not the least difficulty or jealousy about putting arms into the hands of every man in the country. (European countries should not) be ignorant of the strength and the force of such a form of government and how strenuously and almost wonderfully people living under one have sometimes exerted themselves in defence of their rights and liberties and how fatally it has ended with many a man and many a state who have entered into quarrels, wars and contests with them." [George Mason, "Remarks on Annual Elections for the Fairfax Independent Company" in The Papers of George Mason, 1725-1792, ed Robert A. Rutland (Chapel Hill, 1970)]

"To trust arms in the hands of the people at large has, in Europe, been believed...to be an experiment fraught only with danger. Here by a long trial it has been proved to be perfectly harmless...If the government be equitable; if it be reasonable in its exactions; if proper attention be paid to the education of children in knowledge and religion, few men will be disposed to use arms, unless for their amusement, and for the defence of themselves and their country." (Timothy Dwight, Travels in New England and NewYork [London 1823]

"It is not certain that with this aid alone [possession of arms], they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to posses the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will, and direct the national force; and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned, in spite of the legions which surround it." (James Madison, "Federalist No. 46")

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. And yet, though this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline, and a strong disposition, from a sense of its burthens, to be rid of all regulations. How it is practicable to keep the people duly armed without some organization, it is difficult to see. There is certainly no small danger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thus gradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our national bill of rights." (Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States before the Adoption of the Constitution [Boston, 1833])

"The tank, the B-52, the fighter-bomber, the state-controlled police and military are the weapons of dictatorship. The rifle is the weapon of democracy. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military. The hired servants of our rulers. Only the government-and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws." (Edward Abbey, "The Right to Arms," Abbey's Road [New York, 1979])

"You are bound to meet misfortune if you are unarmed because, among other reasons, people despise you....There is simply no comparison between a man who is armed and one who is not. It is unreasonable to expect that an armed man should obey one who is unarmed, or that an unarmed man should remain safe and secure when his servants are armed. In the latter case, there will be suspicion on the one hand and contempt on the other, making cooperation impossible." (Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince")

"You must understand, therefore, that there are two ways of fighting: by law or by force. The first way is natural to men, and the second to beasts. But as the first way often proves inadequate one must needs have recourse to the second." (Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince")

"As much as I oppose the average person's having a gun, I recognize that some people have a legitimate need to own one. A wealthy corporate executive who fears his family might get kidnapped is one such person. A Hollywood celebrity who has to protect himself from kooks is another. If Sharon Tate had had access to a gun during the Manson killings, some innocent lives might have been saved." [Joseph D. McNamara (San Jose, CA Police Chief), in his book, Safe and Sane, (c) 1984, p. 71-72.]

"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]

For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution." [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822)]

" `The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the milita, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right." [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)]

"The provision in the Constitution granting the right to all persons to bear arms is a limitation upon the power of the Legislature to enact any law to the contrary. The exercise of a right guaranteed by the Constitution cannot be made subject to the will of the sheriff." [People vs. Zerillo, 219 Mich. 635, 189 N.W. 927, at 928 (1922)]

"The maintenance of the right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." [State vs. Kerner, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)]

"The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the "high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]



At times we must look beyond what is in the forefront to see what led us to where we are because often there is more than meets the eye. When questionable things happen, it is amazing that solutions just happen to be already prepared and ready to implement such as after 911.

DH

Part of a report detailing the financial fraud, investigations leading to mass arrests involving Federal Reserve and the IRS

IF THIS DOESN'T CONVINCE YOU TO GET OUT OF THE STOCK MARKET AND INVESTMENTS PLUS GET YOUR MONEY OUT OF BANKS AND CREDIT UNIONS ESPECIALLY Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America.

 US FEDERAL MARSHALS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS

The CFTC is the financial investigation branch of the Department of Justice. The personnel who enforce the law on behalf of the Department of Justice are the US federal Marshals.

The US federal Marshals are the only entities legally capable of taking down this cabal -- which has seized control of the world and its resources to an astonishing degree.

The Marshals are allowed to cross state borders, and can enlist the support of the police and the military to aid in their enforcement of the law.

These tools are absolutely critical in defeating such a vastly interconnected entity.

All of these details fit perfectly with the "Mass Arrests" scenario we've been heavily tracking on this website since last November.

In order to do mass arrests, you have to start with mass charges -- leading to mass court cases.

The Department of Justice has now kicked this process into high gear. As you will see, the outraged public is already calling for mass arrests as the scope of the conspiracy sinks in.


THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

At the center of this octopus of global control is the Federal Reserve System. It was originally called the National Reserve System, and was presented in 1911 and 1912 via the Aldrich Plan.

The idea was to outsource the control of the US financial system to a private consortium of international bankers.

Americans then essentially rent their money from these bankers -- and pay them for the honor of using it.

As billionaires, the trust and collateral of these bankers is supposedly superior to any "reserve" within the US government itself.

This vintage cartoon shows how there was a widespread understanding, in the early 20th Century, of the danger we faced if we allowed private bankers to seize control of our financial system.

 WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

This problem did not begin in 1911. Once you have read Financial Tyranny, you will be well aware that it goes back to at least the 1700s.

The results of the Federal Reserve were elegantly summed up by the Ron Paul site:
Ron Paul Site -- Audit the Federal Reserve
http://www.ronpaul.com/congress/legislation/audit-the-federal-reserve-fed-hr-459-s202/

The Federal Reserve is the chief culprit behind the economic crisis.

Its unchecked power to create endless amounts of money out of thin air brought us the boom and bust cycle -- and causes one financial bubble after another.

Since the Fed’s creation in 1913, the dollar has lost more than 96% of its value, and by recklessly inflating the money supply, the Fed continues to distort interest rates -- and intentionally erodes the value of the dollar.

For the past 30 years, Congressman Ron Paul has worked tirelessly to bring much-needed transparency and accountability to the secretive bank.

And in 2009 and 2010, his unfaltering dedication showed astonishing results: HR 1207, the bill to audit the Federal Reserve, swept the country and made the central bankers shudder at their desks.

The bill passed as an amendment both in the House Financial Services Committee and in the House itself. But eventually the most significant portions of the bill were derailed. (Full story here.)

  NOT THIS TIME

Ron Paul's original bill led to a shocking disclosure.

The Federal Reserve paid 26 trillion dollars in bailouts -- with American money it printed, without our permission -- to its own member banks surrounding the financial crash of 2008.

This has still not created anywhere near the degree of outrage that it should have. Corporate media has completely ignored it -- because to publicize it would speed their own destruction.
Here is a small part of the letter where Congressman Alan Grayson reveals how he found this number, in the newly-audited Federal Reserve balance sheets, to John Hively -- “The World’s Most Accurate Economic Forecaster Since 1989”.

http://johnhively.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/breakdown-of-the-26-trillion-the-federal-reserve-handed-out-to-save-rich-incompetent-investors-but-who-purchase-political-power/

CONGRESSMAN GRAYSON: I wouldn’t want anyone to think that I’m dramatizing or amplifying what this GAO report says, so I’m just going to list some of my favorite parts, by page number.

Page 131 – The total lending for the Fed’s “broad-based emergency programs” was $16,115,000,000,000. That’s right, more than $16 trillion. The four largest recipients, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America, received more than a trillion dollars each.

The 5th largest recipient was Barclays PLC. The 8th was the Royal Bank of Scotland Group, PLC. The 9th was Deutsche Bank AG. The 10th was UBS AG. These four institutions each got between a quarter of a trillion and a trillion dollars. None of them is an American bank.

Page 205 – Separate and apart from these “broad-based emergency program” loans were another $10,057,000,000,000 in “currency swaps.” In the “currency swaps,” the Fed handed dollars to foreign central banks, no strings attached, to fund bailouts in other countries….

These currency swaps and the “broad-based emergency program” loans, together, totaled more than $26 trillion. That’s almost $100,000 for every man, woman, and child in America.

That’s an amount equal to more than seven years of federal spending — on the military, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on the debt, and everything else. And around twice America’s total GNP….

If the Fed had extended $26 trillion in credit to the American people instead of Wall Street, would there be 24 million Americans today who can’t find a full-time job?


NOW THE AUDIT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE COMPLETED

However, as the above quote from the Ron Paul site reveals, "the most significant portions of the bill were derailed."

That all may have just changed. The magic date should sound quite familiar by now -- June 27, 2012.
June 27: Ron Paul's Audit The Fed Bill Clears House Panel, Unopposed!
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/economy/235055-house-panel-clears-fed-audit-bill

The House Oversight Committee easily cleared legislation Wednesday that would require a top-to-bottom audit of the Federal Reserve.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), was advanced by the committee on a bipartisan voice vote with no vocal opposition.

The measure, which has garnered 257 co-sponsors from both parties, would require the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct a full audit of the Fed's operations, including its monetary policy deliberations, for the first time....

Before the audit bill cleared the oversight committee on Wednesday, ranking member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) attempted to introduce an amendment that would prevent the GAO from auditing the Fed's deliberations on monetary policy.

Cummings withdrew the amendment after Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) voiced opposition, saying it "essentially guts this bill."

Issa maintained it was ironic that Congress took an intense interest in the $2 billion and counting in losses suffered recently by JPMorgan Chase when it "pales in comparison" to the Fed's multi-trillion dollar portfolio.

"It is long past time for a real audit," he said.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has previously opposed congressional attempts to audit the Fed's monetary policy deliberations, saying it would expose the politically independent institution to lawmaker pressure.


VERY INTERESTING THAT BOTH OF THESE THINGS HAPPENED ON THE SAME DAY

I find it very interesting that the Department of Justice blew the whistle on the LIBOR scandal on the same day that the new Audit the Fed bill passed the House Committee.

Clearly there is a "read between the lines" message being given here -- for those who are paying attention.

The Federal Reserve IS the heart of the "cartel" of bankers that are manipulating the LIBOR rate.

It is safe to say that the Federal Reserve and its affiliates were completely caught off guard by this surprise one-two punch -- and have been scrambling to contain the damage ever since.

Though this has now become a tremendously significant issue in Great Britain, the controlled US monopoly press has essentially been plugging its ears and humming, hoping it will just go away.

Just as I was preparing to publish this, we had another tragic mass shooting in Colorado.

Once you've read Financial Tyranny, you may start to wonder if these "lone nut" assassins are really acting alone.

Stories like this can dominate the headlines for weeks -- and wash away other, embarrassing issues for the Cabal in the meantime.


ROLLING STONE'S MATT TABIBI EXPLAINS THE LIBOR SCANDAL

This next video is an excerpt from Elliott Spitzer's show, Current TV -- and has completely gone viral, for good reason.

It very nicely summarizes what the people have now learned as a result of the LIBOR scandal -- and should be considered "required viewing" for anyone seeking to understand this.

 July 3: Matt Tabibi Explains LIBOR Scandal – It’s Over for the Banking Cartel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oV2mI0IYp8


THE ORIGINAL WRITEUP FROM CURRENT TV

Here is the original writeup of this show, as it appears on the Current TV website. Additional information is provided that is not in the video -- and it is nicely summarized.

July 3: Original Link on Current TV to Spitzer / Tabibi Interview
http://current.com/shows/viewpoint/videos/the-mob-learned-from-wall-street-eliot-spitzer-on-the-cartel-style-corruption-behind-libor-scam/

“Viewpoint” host Eliot Spitzer, Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone contributing editor, and Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, analyze the Libor interest rate–rigging scandal engulfing the banking industry.

Barclays CEO Bob Diamond recently resigned after the bank was fined $453 million for its part in the scandal, which involved manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), a key global benchmark for interest rates, by essentially “faking their credit scores,” according to Taibbi.

And as Taibbi explains, Barclays couldn’t have acted alone.

“It can’t just be Barclays and the Royal Bank of Scotland. In fact, it can’t even be four banks or even five banks,” he says.

“Really, in the end it’s probably going to come out that it’s going to be all of them … involved in this. And that’s what’s critical for people to understand: that this is a cartel-style corruption.”

Kelleher argues that the Libor scandal is proof that the financial industry “is corrupt and rotten to its core.”

“The same executives [using] the same business model that crashed the entire financial system in ’08 are still running these banks,” he says.

  June 27: Barclays Fined for LIBOR Fixing
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9360580/Barclays-hit-with-290m-fine-over-Libor-fixing.html

Barclays has been fined £290m for attempting to manipulate the world’s benchmarking borrowing rate in a blow to the bank’s reputation that has raised questions over the future of chief executive Bob Diamond.

The Financial Services Authority fined Barclays a record £60m, saying staff at the bank had repeatedly made false submissions to help set the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor).

The rate is used to fix the cost of borrowing on mortgages, loans and derivatives worth more than $450 trillion (£288 trillion) globally.

Investigators from the FSA and the US Commodity Futures and Trading Commission said they had found evidence that Barclays had tried to manipulate Libor for several years in the run up to the financial crisis and in its aftermath.

Emails uncovered as part of a three-year investigation into claims that Barclays and other banks attempted to inflate and suppress Libor show the extent of the scandal.

In one message sent to a Barclays employee involved in the bank’s Libor submission, a trader asked for the rate to be set “as high as possible today”, to which the unnamed staff member replied “sure”.

In another, a trader from an unnamed rival bank thanks a Barclays trader for successfully getting the lender’s Libor rate lowered, saying: “Dude. I owe you big time! Come over one day after work and I’m opening a bottle of Bollinger.”

About a dozen banks are being investigated as part of the Libor probe, including state-backed lenders Lloyds Banking Group and Royal Bank of Scotland, as well as many of the largest US and European investment banks.


A SUMMARY OF THE EMAILS

The US federal Marshals and other Department of Justice personnel went in, on a highly secretive basis, and collected emails implicating the Cabal in this vast scandal.

Here, the UK Telegraph summarizes those emails -- on the day this all broke out.

June 27: Key Emails Revealing How Barclays Manipulated LIBOR
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9359392/Key-emails-how-Barclays-manipulated-Libor.html

The report from the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) highlights communications between Barclays traders and those tasked with submitting Libor estimates which it claims show an attempt to manipulate rates on "numerous occasions and sometimes on a daily basis".

 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS ON THE DAY THE SCANDAL BROKE

Events moved at lightning speed in the UK when the scandal broke. Here is a link to a summary of what happened that day.

June 28: Barclays LIBOR Scandal As It Happened
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9361646/Barclays-Libor-scandal-as-it-happened-June-28-2012.html

David Cameron says Barclays has "serious questions to answer" over Libor fixing and George Osborne describes the scandal as a "shocking indictment" of the banks amid calls for the bank's chief executive Bob Diamond to resign.


BRITAIN'S TOP BUSINESS LOBBYING GROUP CALLS LIBOR SCANDAL "DEPLORABLE"

Two days after it started, the head of Britain's top business lobbying group expressed his horror at the depth of this scandal.

June 29: Britain's Top Business Lobbying Group Calls LIBOR Scandal "Deplorable"
http://news.sky.com/story/954195/cbi-boss-barclays-scandal-deplorable

"The manipulation of the LIBOR arrangements is deplorable and undermines international trust in the integrity of the City. This weakness must be addressed and the culprits punished.

"We should be mindful, however, of the importance of banking to the UK economy and that throwing out the baby with the bathwater is in no-one’s interest provided the baby is clean."


BARCLAYS CEO WAS DETERMINED TO STAND HIS GROUND

On July 1st, Bob Diamond, the CEO of Barclays, was still defiantly standing his ground and refusing to step down.

July 1: Barclays CEO Bob Diamond Refuses to Step Down
http://news.sky.com/story/954006/bob-diamond-a-controversial-banker

As Bob Diamond announces he won't step down over the rate-fixing scandal, Sky News takes a look at the controversial man behind the headlines.


GERMAN PRESS BLOWS THE WHISTLE ON THE VATICAN

Many investigators claim that the Vatican is at the epicenter of this vast, interlocking global corporate cabal.

The people orchestrating the mass arrests from the inside also know this -- based on information I and others have gathered.

On July 2nd, an important article appeared in the German press about the ever-accelerating Vatican Bank scandal, which began kicking into high gear as of June 5th, 2012.

This is all part of the orchestrated series of disclosures that must precede the mass arrests.

July 2: Growing Vatican Bank Scandal Threatens Catholic Church Image
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/a-growing-vatican-bank-scandal-threatens-catholic-church-image-a-842140.html

The Vatican scandal over shady bank accounts and millions in suspect transfers began shortly before sunrise on June 5 on Via Giuseppe Verdi, a picturesque street in the old part of Piacenza, a town in northeastern Italy….

The documents confiscated from Gotti Tadeschi, a former confidant of the pope, provided Italian law-enforcement officials insight into the innermost workings of the Vatican bank.

The secret dossier includes references to anonymous numbered accounts and questionable transactions as well as written and electronic communications reportedly showing how Church banking officials circumvented European regulations aimed at combating money-laundering.

A Possible Motive

The drama unfolding in the Vatican is now heading toward a climax….

Several high-ranking officials within the Curia viewed the bank, officially known as the Institute for Works of Religion (IOR), as something akin to a trust company for clandestine monetary transactions that is not only used by the Church, but allegedly also by the mafia as well as corrupt politicians and companies.

In one of the seized Gotti Tedeschi memos, he wrote: "I've seen things in the Vatican that scare me."

It is a clear turning, one which transforms the so-called "Vatileaks" affair into a financial scandal that could seriously damage the reputation of the Holy See.

Internal correspondence dated May 22 from a member of the bank's supervisory board to the Vatican's Secretariat of State notes that the Vatican bank is presently "in an extremely fragile and precarious position" and that the situation had reached "a point of imminent danger."….


THE VATICAN LEADERSHIP IS ALARMED

As we continue with our excerpt, we see just how deeply this scandal is affecting the Vatican. This has the potential to break into mainstream consciousness on a huge level.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/a-growing-vatican-bank-scandal-threatens-catholic-church-image-a-842140.html

The Vatican leadership is alarmed. Archbishops and cardinals are far from thrilled that Italian officials are now rummaging around in their secret affairs.

Papal spokesman Federico Lombardi has openly threatened Italy's law-enforcement apparatus and urged it to kindly respect "the sovereign rights of the Holy See."

In other words, he believes that all those documents including confidential details about the Vatican bank that were seized during the search of Gotti Tedeschi's home should not be in the hands of Italian investigators….

Its business model depends on keeping things as shrouded as possible from all financial authorities.

Capital gains are untaxed, financial statements are not disclosed and anonymity is guaranteed.

The bank's exotic status of belonging to a religious monarchy in a sovereign state the size of a city park has shielded it from investigations and unpleasant external monitoring….

The Vatican has yet to divulge the business practices its bank has been using for decades. "There is fear that, owing to the transparency necessary today, one will find something in the past that one doesn't want to," says Marco Politi, a Rome-based Vatican expert.

Such things could include a complex system of ghost accounts and shell companies like the bank had when Archbishop Paul Casimir Marcinkus was its head in the 1980s….

 INCESTUOUS RELATIONSHIP WITH JP MORGAN

Remember that JP Morgan is the sixth most powerful corporation in the entire "super-entity" of 147 companies identified by the Swiss scientists.

This "super-entity" controls 80 percent of the world's wealth. Now we know that there was an incestuous relationship between JP Morgan and the Vatican Bank.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/a-growing-vatican-bank-scandal-threatens-catholic-church-image-a-842140.html

In 2009, the same year that Gotti Tedeschi took over as president of the IOR, the bank set up an account with the Milan-based branch of the American bank JPMorgan Chase.

>From that point on, millions started flowing on an almost daily basis from JPMorgan's Milan office to the one in Frankfurt, where the IOR also had a JPMorgan account.

Vatican officials opted for a special account in Milan with the number 1365, a so-called "sweep facility account," which was automatically zeroed out at the end of each day.

The Vatican bank confirmed the existence of this account late last week, though it said it was primarily used for handling securities transactions.

Through last year, this financial set-up was allegedly used to process more than a billion euros for the Vatican bank. Italian investigators suspect that it was also used to launder funds from dubious sources.


JP MORGAN DIVORCES THE VATICAN BANK

On March 19, 2012, JP Morgan shocked the financial world by suddenly and abruptly "divorcing" the Vatican Bank.

The announcement was made public after the separation had already started -- and less than two weeks before the divorce was complete.

This was clearly a sign that the Federal Reserve bankers knew troubles were ahead -- and were scrambling for cover as they broke into rival, warring factions.

March 19: JP Morgan Divorces the Vatican Bank
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/19/vatican-bank-image-hurt-closed_n_1363432.html

VATICAN CITY/MILAN, March 19 (Reuters) - JP Morgan Chase is closing the Vatican bank's account with an Italian branch of the U.S. banking giant because of concerns about a lack of transparency at the Holy See's financial institution, Italian newspapers reported.

The move is a blow to the Vatican's drive to have its bank included in Europe's "white list" of states that comply with international standards against tax fraud and money-laundering.

The bank, formally known as the Institute for Works of Religion (IOR), enacted major reforms last year in an attempt to get Europe's seal of approval and put behind it scandals that have included accusations of money laundering and fraud.

Italy's leading financial daily Il Sole 24 Ore reported at the weekend that JP Morgan Chase in Milan had told the IOR of the closing of its account in a letter on Feb. 15.

The letter said the IOR's account in Italy's business capital would gradually be phased out starting on March 16 and closed on March 30.

In Milan, JP Morgan Chase declined to comment and the Vatican also had no comment.


BARCLAYS CEO SUDDENLY RESIGNS ON JULY 2ND

Now, as we jump back into our timeline, the Vatican scandal got worse as of June 5th, after JP Morgan fled the scene -- and the story got major publicity as of July 2nd.

Then, the very next day, the CEO of Barclay Bank suddenly resigned -- even after he had been digging his heels in and saying "hell no, I won't go" before that.

What kind of pressure was applied to Mr. Diamond to make him suddenly shift so dramatically?
July 3: Barclays CEO Suddenly Resigns, 24 Hours After Defiant Self-Defense
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/barclays-chief-executive-bob-diamond-resigns-064421614--finance.html

"Bob Diamond has quit as chief executive of Barclays bank in a shock twist to the rate-rigging scandal.

Marcus Agius, who anounced his intention to resign as chairman only yesterday [July 2nd], is to take over the running of the bank while a successor to Mr Diamond is found.

The announcement was unexpected in that Mr Diamond had made it clear to staff in a memo 24 hours earlier [July 1st] that he had no intention of falling on his sword - saying it was his responsibility to restore the bank's reputation."


PEOPLE START REALIZING THE WHOLE GAME IS RIGGED

On July 3rd, the same day as our Current TV episode aired, the Huffington Post featured an article showing how the public is realizing that the whole investment game has been rigged.

July 3: LIBOR Scandal Suggests the Whole Game is Rigged
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/03/barclays-scandal-investor-confidence_n_1647715.html

A string of Wall Street crises, including the 2008 stock market crash, the collapse of the mortgage market, the botched Facebook IPO and the scandals at JPMorgan Chase and Barclays have meant “some very heavy body blows experienced by the public,” Richard Grasso, former chairman of the New York Stock Exchange, told CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo on Tuesday.

“It's been a real tough time for consumers who want to get back into the market."

Grasso’s comments followed remarks last week by Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro that investors have a "concern about the integrity of the marketplace."

Schapiro told a congressional subcommittee that U.S. markets are threatened with "an unwillingness [on the part of investors] to ever engage in the markets again."

Investors are unsure "whether they're getting accurate and honest information" from companies looking to sell stock to the public and uncertain "whether the market structure itself is tilted against the individual investor and in favor the institutional investor," Schapiro said.

A recent survey from financial research and advisory firm Tabb Group reported that 31 percent of investors had "weak" or "very weak" confidence in the stock market, compared with 15 percent in 2010.

“There are some people out there feeling like the game is rigged,” said Frederick.

“There have been enough events to make them suspicious. I think that’s unfortunate. And the industry needs to continue to make efforts to allay the concerns.”


BARCLAYS BETRAYS THE ROTHSCHILDS -- I.E. THE BANK OF ENGLAND

The Bank of England has been controlled by the Rothschild family since the early 1800s, as I revealed in Financial Tyranny.

You don't directly see the name "Rothschild" in the super-entity of 147 corporations, but it's hiding in there behind other names.

It was very shocking to see Barclays Bank publicly throw the Rothschilds -- i.e. the Bank of England -- under the bus as the screws turned on them.

July 3: Barclays Claims Bank of England Told Them to Rig Interest Rates
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9374289/The-Bank-of-England-told-us-to-do-it-claims-Barclays.html

A memo published by Barclays suggested that Paul Tucker gave a hint to Bob Diamond, the bank’s chief executive, in 2008 that the rate it was claiming to be paying to borrow money from other banks could be lowered.

His suggestion followed questions from “senior figures within Whitehall” about why Barclays was having to pay so much interest on its borrowings, the memo states.

Barclays and other banks have been accused of artificially manipulating the Libor rate, which is used to set the borrowing costs for millions of consumers, businesses and investors, by falsely stating how much they were paying to borrow money.

The bank claimed yesterday that one of its most senior executives cut the Libor rate only at the height of the credit crisis after intervention from the Bank of England….

The disclosure of the document threatened to plunge one of the biggest high street banks into open war with the country’s central bank, which will soon assume responsibility for regulating Barclays.

In one of the most dramatic days in British corporate history, Mr Diamond resigned yesterday, less than 24 hours after telling staff he was the right man to reform the bank….


MATT TABIBI DROPS A BIG ARTICLE ON LIBOR ON JULY 3RD

Also on July 3rd, the same day he appeared on Current TV, Matt Tabibi released a significant article on the LIBOR scandal.

His journalism blends a gut-level realism with exceptional research -- and therefore has a way of cutting through the jargon and getting to the core of the issue

July 3: Why Is Nobody Freaking Out About the LIBOR Scandal?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/why-is-nobody-freaking-out-about-the-libor-banking-scandal-20120703

The LIBOR manipulation story has exploded into a major scandal overseas.

The CEO of Barclays, Bob Diamond, has resigned in disgrace; his was the first of what will undoubtedly be many major banks to walk the regulatory plank for fixing the interbank exchange rate.

The Labor party is demanding a sweeping criminal investigation. Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, responded the way a real public official should (i.e. not like Ben Bernanke), blasting the banks:

It is time to do something about the banking system…  Many people in the banking industry are hardworking and feel badly let down by some of their colleagues and leaders.

It goes to the culture and the structure of banks: the excessive compensation, the shoddy treatment of customers, the deceitful manipulation of a key interest rate, and today, news of yet another mis-selling scandal.

The furor is over revelations that Barclays, the Royal Bank of Scotland, and other banks were monkeying with at least $10 trillion in loans (The Wall Street Journal is calculating that that LIBOR affects $800 trillion worth of contracts)….

That is explosive stuff…

The implications of that part of the story should be particularly chilling to Americans, who in recent years have been party to a number of revelations about strange and seemingly inappropriate contacts between senior regulatory officials and big bankers during the heat of the crisis.

We know that American officials in 2008-2009 were extremely concerned about the appearance of weakness in the financial markets, so much so that they may have resisted pursuing criminal prosecutions against big banks, and we also know that they spent a lot of time commiserating with Wall Street figures before and during the crisis….


TABIBI REVEALS "IT'S LIKE THE WORLD'S ECONOMY IS BUILT ON QUICKSAND"

As our excerpt continues, you can feel even more of the powerful indignation and shock that is rippling through the global investment community at this time.

Even the most skeptical and sarcastic folks in the financial world have been hit in the head with a wooden plank by this scandal.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/why-is-nobody-freaking-out-about-the-libor-banking-scandal-20120703

Anyway, the LIBOR story is leading the front pages of most of Britain’s dailies, it’s on TV, and it’s producing blistering editorials and howls of outrage amongst politicians and activists.

But as compadre Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism put it, where’s the outrage here in America?....

The New York Times, meanwhile, did chime in with a house editorial yesterday, and it was appropriately somber. And there has been some coverage in the financial press.

But to me what’s missing from all of this is the “Holy F--king S-it!” factor.

This story is so outrageous that it shocks even the most cynical Wall Street observers.

I have a friend who works on Wall Street who for years has been trolling through the stream of financial corruption stories with bemusement, darkly enjoying the spectacle as though the whole post-crisis news arc has been like one long, beautifully-acted, intensely believable sequel to Goodfellas.

But even he is just stunned to the point of near-speechlessness by the LIBOR thing. “It’s like finding out that the whole world is on quicksand,” he says.

So as far as the stateside press goes, I’ve got to assume the cavalry is coming soon. But when?

THE IRS GETS AUDITED FOR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN FRAUD -- JULY 3RD

Furthermore, on July 3rd we found out the IRS was being audited -- for billions of dollars in fraud.

The IRS is not innocent in all of this either. Corruption exists throughout the entire system -- as we are increasingly finding out.

Their own employees have now turned against them.
July 3: IRS Gets Audited -- For Allowing Billions of Dollars in Fraud
www.wnd.com/2012/07/and-finally-the-irs-gets-audited/

The federal agency that strikes fear into many U.S. taxpayers is getting a dose of its own medicine – as it is now the focus of a year-long audit for allowing illegal aliens to scam the system and bilk taxpayers out of billions of dollars every year.

Federal employees are blowing the whistle on the Internal Revenue Service, according to a report by Indianapolis television station WTHR-TV….

Howard Antelis, a tax examiner at the IRS’ ITIN processing center in Austin, Texas, explained: “We were being told by upper management to ignore fraud, to assign ITIN numbers and … pay out refunds to people who are lying. It’s a license to steal when you allow that.”…

Antelis said he reported the scams regularly to his managers – for years – with no result.

Frustrated with the inaction, he called the Inspector General’s office in Washington, D.C.

“I’ve been working for the federal government for 23 years and I signed an ethical standard of conduct when I went to work that says if you see fraud, you need to report it,” he said.

“I tried and tried and tried, couldn’t get anywhere so … I went into a quiet room and started making phone calls.”…

The auditors made a shocking discovery: IRS employees were, in fact, encouraged to overlook indications of fraud….

“It’s pure negligence by management and they’ve been trying to keep it quiet,” Antelis said. “There is a criminal element that is defrauding the U.S. government by filing mountains and mountains of these fraudulent applications.

"We see them in piles in bulk every day that are obviously not legitimate documents and not legitimate tax returns and not legitimate wages … and [IRS managers] don’t want to deal with it.

"That’s where all the fraud is. The fraud is in the fake notary stamps and fake documents which we’ve been accepting.”


BRITISH PARLIAMENT CALLS FOR MASS ARRESTS

By July 4th, members of the British Parliament were openly calling for mass arrests of the top CEOs and bankers who manipulated the LIBOR rate for their own gains.

July 4: British Parliament Calls for Mass Arrests in LIBOR Scandal
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18702653

The prime minister [David Cameron] said a single parliamentary inquiry into the "appalling" events would be the most "swift and decisive" course of action.

But Labour's leader [Ed Miliband] said this was "too narrow" and a much wider judicial probe into the culture of banking was needed….

At Prime Minister's Questions, Mr Cameron said the manipulation of the key Libor inter-bank borrowing rate by Barclays traders was "outrageous" and those responsible for "spivvy and probably illegal activity" should be held to account.

"People want to know that crime in our banks, crime in our financial services, will be pursued and punished like crimes on our streets," he told MPs….

But, in heated exchanges in the Commons, Mr Miliband said the prime minister did not understand the "depth of public concerns" about the matter and was failing to act in the national interest.

"Whenever these scandals happen, he has failed to act and he stands up for the wrong sort of people.

"His party is a party bankrolled by the banks. If he fails to order a judge-led inquiry people will come to one conclusion. He simply cannot act in the national interest."


MORE TO COME

Over the years, I have built up contacts with insiders who are very well-positioned -- due to my role as a public investigator.

I received  information that absolutely convinced me there was a plan to do the impossible -- to actually break up this Cabal and arrest its top conspirators.

Some people thought the mass arrests we've been discussing on this site would just start one day.

All of a sudden, the marshals and the troops are out in the streets -- and top Cabal people are being hauled off to prison.

What we are now seeing is a plot twist that had to be hidden -- for obvious reasons -- but it makes perfect sense.

If you want to make mass arrests, in a way that is fair, legal and publicly supported, first you need to make mass charges -- followed by mass lawsuits.

If you suddenly just arrest thousands of top people, with no legal precedent, the public will not know who to trust.

This way, the process occurs in a much less traumatic fashion. You have to awaken the public to the problem first, on a mass level, before any palpable solution can be offered.



http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1066-great-revealing by David Wilcock 

DH 

‘You Fu** With Me!’: Cop Threatens to Kill Concealed Carry Gun Owner During Traffic Stop

This cop has a serious problem and needs to be fired...

If we do not take our country back this is what we will see daily...
You all need to see this....

Reagan Warned Us About Obama - short vid of his speech

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Reagan Warned Us About Obama - short vid of his speech
Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 21-Jul-2012 13:35:45

I don't care if you agree with Reagan or not. Listen to the words.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3hY1eagq88&feature=related

The time may be very short to save our country.

My Fellow Americans –

I cannot overstate the seriousness of my concern for the future of America. The time may be very short to save our country.

Many of you have discounted the warnings which I and others have been issuing since early 2008, well before the last presidential election. We have tried to warn you that the man you elected as president was not only constitutionally ineligible to serve in that office, but also that he may be a non-U.S. citizen, and that he was almost certainly a devotee of Communist ideology if not an enrolled member of the Communist Party of the USA.

It is now evident that a Communist takeover of the United States government has taken place. The history of these takeovers is clear, and it is not pleasant.

Communist governments are, by their very nature, obsessed with control. They strive constantly and relentlessly to increase their control over every aspect of the lives of their victims by “whatever means necessary”.

This means that words and laws mean nothing in a Communist dictatorship. They mean whatever those in power want them to mean, and they can change from one day to the next. Sometimes an “Executive Order” will be issued alerting the people to a change, but often a change in government policy further restricting the rights of the citizens will only be discovered by accident as some new outrage against the rule of law occurs.

This is what has been happening, with frightening rapidity, as the “president” issues new Executive Orders almost on a daily basis, and various alarming changes in government policies and plans come to our attention without prior notice.

One of the most consistent patterns following a Communist takeover is that those in power will never give up power voluntarily. They will go to whatever lengths necessary to maintain and protect their positions of power.

This means that the 2012 presidential election process is in serious jeopardy. If the party in power believes that it can control the outcome of the election, it may allow the election process to go forward. However, if they begin to see indications that the election outcome may be in question, or that any legal challenge to the legitimacy of the present administration may be gaining traction, they will almost certainly resort to desperate measures to maintain their position of power and control.

That is the situation in which we find ourselves as a nation. Both the legitimacy of the present administration and the political situation for the Obama/Soetoro administration are becoming increasingly problematic as further information regarding the mysterious origins of the “president” comes to light, and the economy continues to deteriorate.

In my opinion, this is a very dangerous time for America. Something could happen almost any day which would completely change the order and patterns of daily life in America. This would be something unprecedented in our country, but it is becoming more likely as each day passes.

The article published today by Private Investigator Doug Hagmann at Canada Free Press is extremely germane to this concern. His contact deep inside the Department of Homeland Security is indicating that these concerns are real and immediate:


While there are those who claim that there are individuals at high levels within law enforcement and the U.S. military services who are aware of the situation and are prepared to act to save the nation, these claims cannot be verified.

Unfortunately, our representatives in Congress have made it clear that they are either complicit in the plan to destroy this nation or they are unwilling to act to save it. That leaves very little that ordinary citizens can do to prevent the tragedy that is occurring before our eyes.

The one thing we can do as citizens is to become informed to the best of our ability. We no longer have the option of ignoring the problems around us and assuming that life in America will go on as we have known it. This is simply not the case. If you do not confront what is happening in your country, it will eventually confront you.

I urge you to read carefully Doug Hagmann’s article, then read another article posted at “The Ulsterman Report” on July 19, 2012 based on an interview with an individual purporting to be a U.S. military insider:


Reflect on what these people are trying to tell us. Then think about what you are willing to do to save your country.


A Concerned American Veteran

YES, GOD EXISTS! By Erasmus of America (originally released nationally Oct 27, 1993. Maybe America is now ready to learn about God And honor God for real!)

     God endorsed this report on Oct. 27, 1993 with a stunning Miracle of God. The same day the national mailing of this report was completed, the large, deadly tumor that had been growing on the chest of the author's wife suddenly fell off that evening, and 14 hours later a doctor could find no evidence that there had ever been a tumor there! God smiles on this report! (And only time this ever happened in my life, one time I went under what I guess would be called a "Holy Ghost possession." I was asked if I truly loved Jesus. I would reply yes. Then I was told to publicize my family I.Q. background. I protested I did not want to do this. The third time I was asked to do this and it given to me by revelation that Christianity was being smeared by its enemies as no intelligent man would be a Christian and they claimed that there were no intelligent proofs of God, I finally agreed to do this and the possession of the Holy Spirit of God then left me. So the secret story is now admitted that I was ordered by the Will of Jesus Christ to put into print this family reference below.) 
     My mother had been a child actress and never attended school (except for maybe six weeks). She self-educated herself after learning how to read and write from her grandmother. At 10 years of age she scored the highest I.Q. of any child in American history up to then. She later entered a university with no prior formal education. My own I.Q. has been scored at genius or above. (I refused to write in 1993 that a Wash., D.C. I.Q. test claimed I had scored beyond scientific measurement in I.Q. Enough said.)Since many in our colleges and newspapers seem to assert that no intelligent person would be a Christian or believe in God, I hope this information will put into a discredited position those pushing this anti-Christian propaganda and who are trying to trick the public (through our Marxist based brainwashing public schools) into believing that only stupid and foolish people would become Christians or seriously believe in God.
     I can only show in this tiny space maybe a small fraction of 1% of the scientific proofs I have which show the existence of God. For example. let us mathetically reverse the population figures for the human race. Mathematics indicate that mankind has been on this Earth for only 5,000 to 15,000 years due to the fertility of soil which controls population growth of races. That means that only God could create life on our planet in such a short time available, and there was no time for evolution to occur. (Population figures were standard and taken from standard references such as information almanacs.) 
     The mathematics of the DNA genetic codes to living cells was fed into scientific computer systems. The computers calculated the mathematcal odds to be virtually infinity against living cells ever being able to evolve into other life forms. This frankly means that the theory of evolution is scientifically impossible! It never happened! When asked the serious scienific questions: "Did the chicken or the egg come first?", and "Did the seed or the tree come first?", the valid scientific answer to these two questions can only be, "God came fist and then created life!"
     When astronauts landed on the Moon, they found 1/30th inch of meterorite dust on its surface. The rate of fall of meteorite dust on the Moon indicates by mathematics that the Moon is therefore only a few thousand years old. The evolutionists claim that the Moon and Earth are the same basic age. If true, then the meteorite dust testifies that the Earth is also just a few thousand years old and physically way too young to have any evolution of life possible on Earth. Also, volcanic eruptions indicate that our Earth is still young, just cooling off from creation, not an ancient planet. Also, the decay of the Earth's magnetic field indicates that our planet is about 7,000 years to 10,000 years old maximum! Also, the pressure of our fields worldwide indicate they were formed less than 10,000 years ago. This means the Earth is YOUNG! Two science foundations tried to disprove me on the lunar dust issue. They quoted from numerous scientists all over the Earth. I answered back and showed why NASA's own data proved my position correct. They were stunned into silence and couldn't answer me back. (One foundation's vice president only comment back was, "You are a natural born genius!")
     When evolutionists claimed their tests proved one piece of lava was formed in a volcano at least 3 billion years ago, they were disproved when it was revealed that this piece of lava was known to have been in a volcano less than 200 years ago. "Scientific" dating methods do not prove the age of our planet. They only guess at it. "In The Beginning" by Dr. Walter T. Brown, Jr. shows these teststo be faulty!
     At over 500 sites, more complex fossils were found beneath simpler fossils which would be scientifically impossible  if the theory of evolution was true. And it seems that no fossils are being created today! If the fossils were created by a great world flood( the world flood being reported in the Bible and up to 500 other ancient cultures also   reported the world flood, the ark with the animals and a few humans to save life on earth. With that much smoke there must be some fire or historical truth to this world flood! And to crucify the evolutionists in their theory of evolution, they had to censor from science courses that two British scientists discovered the enzymes that correct damage to DNA genetic codes in living cells so they can in nature never evolve into other life forms! But silence please! And totally censor this from public education because it proves that evolution of life is scientifically impossible and never happened except in the minds of wild fools who are described in the Bible as, "The fool says in his heart that there is no God.") Now if the fossils were created by a great world flood and not by gradual processes over billions of years, then the theory of evolution is a GIANT HOAX! (As Grant Jeffrey once demonstrated, take standard math and standard population figures taken from scientific references, if mankind were really even one million years old as claimed by evolutionists, then standard math states by one million years there would theoretically be more humans on earth than all the atoms in the universe. Naive evolutionists  need to study how fast compound math would skyrocket the number of humans on earth if man had been on this earth for even one million years! Sorry evolutionists, but you lose the argument that the theory of evolution is even a valid scientific theory!)
     The Bible has over 10,000 prophecies in it. of which most have already come true. The mathematical odds against this being possible are virtually infinity. (Don't forget folks, that after this report was released before it  got widely publicized that a math code was found in Hebrew in the Old Testament. In math code, This defied mathematical   odds of 3 billion to one against this being possible when this Bible Code in Genesis  listed the names and year of death of 66 prominent Jewish rabbis for the last 2,000 years. Separately in the Old Testament, in a couple of short chapters, in this Bible Code was listed Jesus Christ, His Apostles, events in His life, etc.! Hitler, location of concentration camps, other Nazi leaders, all listed in Bible Code . The Koran, other books were tested, and apparently no books in the world had this prophetic Bible Code except the Bible of the Christians and Jews. That is God's signature that He wrote the Bible and not other books claimed God wrote. I haven't tried it yet, but another source using this Bible Code indicated that it indicated that Obama wanted to be the most evil leader in human history and would be savagely damned by God after this life unless he repented before God which I doubt he can!) This shows that God is behind he Bible and controls human history. And Jesus Christ fulfilled 332 prophecies out of 332 in the Old Testament. Also, critics of the Bible 150 years ago claimed the Old Testament was mostly fiction, and that most of the cities and battles listed never existed. Since the founding of Israel in 1948, almost all of the sites liste in the Old Testament have been found and verified. As usual, the Bible critics strike out and their claims against the Bble prove to be lies or else outbursts of stupidity instead of intelligence in their hatred of God and the Bible of God.) The Bible, prophetically, (supernaturally in constant Miracles of God in Christianity for the last 2,000 years whereas Islam, etc. don't have these supernatural Miracles of God occur with their religions), and historically has been proven to be quite accurate. The Bible is the supernatural Word of God for man!
     I briefly died in 1958. I was not spiritually ready to die. I made an offer to God if I was given back my life. I was given back my life and this article is part of the deal I offered to God if given back my life. (By the way, the man who predicted nearly all the important things to happen later in my life stopped me on a street when he told me that I had recently died but God gave me back my life. And then he made a long list of predictions about my future and told me secrets of my life. I was so startled by all this I forgot to ask him his name. I was a military cadet on summer vacation when this incredible meeting with this man occurred.) I have heard the testimony of medical doctors   and other  educated people who were diagnosed as clinically dead, some for many hours, and then came back to life, which is supposed to be "medically impossible." Our death experiences all have common factors to them which seem to confirm the testimony of those  who died and whom God restored to life for whatever reasons. I learned in 1958 that the one and only reason for our lives on Earth was to become friends with God. The rest was not really that important in the scheme of eternity. If we do not become friends with God during our life, then we have wasted our entire life and will be condemned for eternity instead of living with God for all eternity. I alsolearned that you must make Jesus your Saviour so that you are not condemned for etenity because you rejected the mercy, frienship and love of God offered through Jesus Christ, God the Son, appointed Saviour of Mankind.
     In 1984 my wife Linda had a large tumor on her face and a much larger tumor inside her. The medical field urged immediate surgery in order to protect her life. The medical field urged immediate  surgery in order to protect her life. We refused this surgery and instead practiced what the Bible taught us to do if we wanted a Miracle of God to take care of these tumor. Later, to the shock of the medical field, a national insurance company (Mutual of Omaha), our local church and othe sources, the large tumor fell off her face one evening and the larger tumor inside her disappeared into thin air, which startled the medical clinic when they examined her immediately afterwards. Yes, God does exist! Give your life to Jesus today and He will give you His Life, ETERNAL LIFE!
     Remember Jesus  has crowns for soul winners! Don't forget the Great Commission! Evangelize! Yours for God and Country, Erasmus of America (pen name. Look up other reports of Erasmus of America at Nesara News in their archive listings for May, June, and July of 2012. My email address is fastboomamericaneconomy@gmail.com . Ask for a copy of my 4 page Omni Law and learn how we can save the American economy by using the Christian Economics taught by Jesus Christ in the New Testament.Be sure and make copies of this report by copy and paste or forward emails sent to you with this report enclosed in the email to you. Christians and churches, I have given you the victory of winning most of America back to serious Christianity if you but seriously push this report until virtualy all of America has seen this report. The atheists hate this report as they cannot answer it back with credibility! I have given you the weapon to win most of America back to Jesus Christ. Now be soldiers for Christ and storm America with this God-inspired report! I give God the credit for the knowledge I have shared with you!)

THE CURRENT "PRESIDENT" OF "THE UNITED STATES" IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL!!!! DONT MISS THIS!!!!!!!

To all my family and friends ................

THE CURRENT "PRESIDENT" OF "THE UNITED STATES" IN THE BOOK OF DANIEL!!!!  DONT MISS THIS!!!!!!!

RED ALERT..... This is a must see.  It confirms that it isn’t the Holy Spirit that is going to be gone and cease restraining the evil but that it is the office of the President of THE UNITED STATES that will be discontinued and the President declare himself as a dictator with his armed cronies helping him. (Remember Aug 3, 1934 - Hitler declared himself Fuhrer, the supreme leader of Germany by joining the offices of President and Chancellor into the one office of Fuhrer.)   

This fits in well with the capstone of the pyramid being completed by the 44th president of the U. S., and the time of the New World Order coming into power in full. 
 
Please, please, please listen to this teaching prayerfully.   Follow along and take notes. Invite the Holy Spirit to speak to YOU, to clarify TRUTH to YOU versus incorrect teachings and beliefs.

2 Thess. 2:2-11 and the entire 2nd chapter is often misinterpreted by believers because they haven’t studied it out for themselves, or  they just accepted what they have heard from their pastors and teachers without checking it out for themselves. 

Daniel 12:8-13  We are in the 'last day's' and the time for the REVEALING of WHAT HAS BEEN SEALED PER THE LORD GOD HIMSELF HAS COME. God is NOW REVEALING what He had sealed.  Put aside all former teachings of man and pre-conceived ideas and seek the Holy Spirit for what He will reveal to those who seek Him with all of their heart.

Things are becoming more and more perilous.  It is time to repent, truly searching our hearts to be sure we are walking according to God’s will for our hearts.


Sgt. Clifford Stone Threatened – Spread the Word

Sgt. Clifford Stone Threatened – Spread the Word

Retired Sgt. Clifford Stone posted these two messages below on his fb wall on Thursday, July 19. He is a truthteller about the UFO cover-up.
Please send light and protection to surround Cliff and his home and family. And feel free to re-post this message.
If you are not familiar with Sgt. Stone, following is a short bio (from CoasttoCoast). Clifford’s facebook posts follow, then I’ve posted a video of Clifford being interviewed by Kerry Cassidy, of Project Camelot, back in February 2007.
Who Is Sgt. Clifford Stone?
Source: http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guest/stone-clifford/7364
“In the world of UFO research, the name of retired Army sergeant Clifford Stone is nearly a legend. Decorated Vietnam combat veteran who served 22 years, Stone claims that he led a double life from the late 60′s through his retirement in 1990. While officially assigned to an “NBC” Team (nuclear, biological and chemical retrieval and abatement detail), he asserts that he also served on Top Secret UFO crash retrieval missions where he had physical contact with downed ET craft and interactions with captured non-human life forms. The official NBC Team assignment allegedly served as a cover for those highly secretive and compartmentalized operations. Over a period of nearly 40 years, Stone has amassed one of the largest private collections of authentic government documents clearly establishing the hard reality of the UFO phenomenon.”"
Messages from Sgt. Stone:
Clifford Stone
Thank you for asking. Please watch my facebook in the next [several] days, as I have been [targeted] by the drug [cartel]. You know I won’t run away. If it is war they wish, they have it. Remember me as I was, not as the media may try to show me. I am about to become [violent], and as you and my kids from job corps know this is not my nature. Know that no one see my back. When confronted by a threat, I face it head on. This is what I you and the kids at Roswell Job Corps and Must do the same. All that shared with you and the kids at Roswell Job Corps is the reason thy are after me. Please pass this on. I shall stand my ground until the death. Would you believe it has to do with grage collection? God Bless, Cliff (Stony)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 02:47:32 -0700
39 minutes ago via · Unlike · 1.
Clifford Stone
Please understand, I do not know how to run away. when confronted with a threat, I stand and fight. For the last 5 weeks, my grage has not been collected. Today, I watched, they picked up the puck and dropped it and drove off. Within in an hour, I was visited and told to stop talking. I [stepped] out side of my door and hit the gentleman in the nose. It bleed badly. Sorry, folks, but I [refuse] to be [threatened], I will fight back. Little things lead to bigger things, as I was told. I will not run, I will fight back, but I do not want to hurt [innocent] [people] in that fight. By you people knowing, this is my protection and my defense. Come tomorrow, I start fighting back and I know all Hell is about to be loosed upon me and the world needs to know why. Please share this e-mail. God Bless, Cliff Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:34:06 -0700

Gun Owners of America Offering Real Solutions to Last Night’s Shootings


Gun Owners of America Offering Real Solutions to Last Night’s Shootings
Friday, July 20, 2012 4:00
100% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

LETS SEE NOW... COLUMBINE....COLORADO.... AURORA.....COLORADO......
google search shootings Colorado...AMAZING HOW MANY.... Remember the ahos have one of their NWO bases near by...
As another Gun Free Kill Zone claims lives.
 
Gun Owners of America
Washington, DC --(Ammoland.com)- Last night’s shooting in Aurora, Colorado was extremely tragic, as more than a dozen people were killed in another Gun Free Kill Zone.
At the opening showing of “The Dark Knight Rises,” James Holmes dressed up in costume and murdered several people while the movie was barely thirty minutes into the story. The gunman used a movie gunfight to cover his actions and further surprise the innocent patrons. Worse, the theater in Aurora reportedly has a “no guns” policy.
Despite gun control’s obvious failure, the calls for more restrictions have already begun:
  • Piers Morgan of CNN came out of the box, calling for more gun control in the wake of the shooting.
  • New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the strategy of people arming themselves for self-defense just “doesn’t work.”
  • And the Brady Campaign took the opportunity to tell the nation that, “This is yet another horrific reminder that guns enable mass killings.”
Advertisement
Tragically, many were killed last night. But it is also tragic that there was not another gun-toting Samuel Williams at the theater — the senior who rescued several Floridians against two armed thugs at an Internet cafe last week. (You can read the story and watch the exciting video here.)
And of course, while the national media is sure to focus on this Aurora, Colorado shooting for days to come, there is another shooting in that same city that you probably heard nothing about — when a worshipper at an Aurora church stopped a shooting this past April.
In that shooting, the bad guy was only able to kill one person in the parking lot, as the armed hero took him out before any other damage could be done.
Funny how the national media tends NOT to pick up stories where the good guy stops the perp!
To keep this in perspective, whenever we hear about horrid shootings like the one last night in Aurora, Colorado, we should remember that guns save as many as 80 lives for every one that is tragically taken. See the Gun Owners of America Fact Sheet here.
Gun Owners of America is appearing on several media outlets today to answer questions about our gun rights and to offer concealed carry solutions as the cure to future acts of terrorism like this.
Also, you can call in to GOA Radio Live to discuss this event with our Talk Show host, Bill Frady, from 6:00-8:00 pm tonight. Call 703-776-9264 to be on the show. GOA’s Larry Pratt will be interviewed by Frady next week.
Please stand with us and help GOA continue defending our gun rights across the country.
Gun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102
Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585
FAX: 703-321-8408
www.gunowners.org
About:
Gun Owners of America (GOA) is a non-profit lobbying organization formed in 1975 to preserve and defend the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. GOA sees firearms ownership as a freedom issue. `The only no comprise gun lobby in Washington’ – Ron Paul