Plan X: DARPA’s New Project Seeks to Make Cyberwarfare a Routine Part of U.S. Military Operations

By Madison Ruppert
theintelhub.com
August 23, 2012

Captain Jason Simmons, left, and Staff Sgt. Clinton Tips update anti-virus software for Air Force units to assist in the prevention of cyberspace hackers at Barksdale AFB (Image credit: U.S. Air Force photo/Technical Sgt. Cecilio Ricardo)

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) – the Pentagon’s research agency responsible for such unbelievable research and development projects such as weaponized hallucinations, robots which are not only lifelike but also nearly as efficient as human beings, on-demand genetically engineered bio-products, creepy chameleon-like soft robots and dirt cheap miniature spy computers, to just mention a few projects – is now working on a new, classified cyberwarfare project dubbed “Plan X.”

DARPA claims that the project is not aiming to create the next Stuxnet but instead to make computer-based warfare “a more routine part of U.S. military operations,” according to Wired’s Danger Room.

One might point out that just naming Stuxnet (which has been linked to the U.S. and Israel according to experts) is a bit misleading since one must also include the related piece of malicious software called “Duqu” and the most recently discovered, astoundingly advanced software known as “Flame.”

Indeed, the cyberwarfare ambitions of the United States (and Israel as well, as the Times of India points out) are quite grand indeed, evidenced not only by malware like Stuxnet but also by the seemingly grandiose Plan X.

DARPA seeks, in their own words, to “dominate the cyber battlespace,” which shouldn’t be all too hard for the agency largely responsible for creating the internet in the first place.

The push for even more sophisticated cyberwarfare capabilities has increased considerably in recent history with the creation of the program known as “Cyber Fast Track” which is designed to get money awarded to “non-traditional players” (meaning hackers, small companies, etc.) in an average of seven days.

For those not familiar with government contracting, that time frame is amazingly narrow, especially when Cyber Fast Track is entirely “a research effort,” according to their official website.
DARPA seeks to create tools for the military planners that allow them to rapidly launch cyberattacks and discover “ways to assess the damage caused by a new piece of friendly military malware before it’s unleashed,” according to Danger Room.

Ken Gabriel, the former acting director of DARPA, told the Washington Post that they want to create something like a digital battlefield map which would allow the military brass to observe the “fighting” as it occurs.

“In a split microsecond you could have a completely different flow of information and set of nodes,” Gabriel said. “The challenge and the opportunity is to create a capability where you’re always getting a rapid, high-order look of what the Internet looks like — of what the cyberspace looks like at any one point in time.”

Plan X was formally announced in a solicitation entitled “Plan X Proposers’ Day Workshop” on August 20, 2012 and the Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) will be released by the end of September 2012.

Interestingly, while the Proposers’ Day Workshop will be held on September 27, 2012 at the DARPA Conference Center in Arlington, Virginia, only one of the sessions is unclassified.
According to the solicitation posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website, “There will be an unclassified session in the morning and a classified SECRET session in the afternoon. Attendance at the afternoon session is limited to individuals with US DOD SECRET clearances or higher. Neither session is open to the general public or members of the media.”
The roughly $100 million Plan X program “is explicitly not funding research and development efforts in vulnerability analysis or cyberweapon generation,” according to the solicitation.
It seems that Plan X is mostly focused on creating a kind of standardized system for the U.S. cyberwarfare program by creating so-called “standing rules of engagement” and pre-defined battle plans which would enable the military to react almost instantly to a cyberattack.
According to military brass, if they are forced to wait for than just a few moments, the U.S.’s ability to respond might be crippled.
Plan X is aiming to create mission plans as easy to carry out as “the auto-pilot function in modern aircraft,” while still containing “formal methods to provably quantify the potential battle damage from each synthesized mission plan.”
In other words, they want a push-button solution capable of executing a cyberattack with quantifiable damage and thus calculable collateral damage.
Once their “auto-pilot” cyberwarfare plan is put into operation, DARPA would like to have computer systems which they define as “hardened ‘battle units’ that can perform cyberwarfare functions such as battle damage monitoring, communication relay, weapon deployment, and adaptive defense.”
Personally, I see this as a highly troubling development, as Danger Room rightly points out, “Of course, many critics of U.S. policy believe the deployment of cyberweapons is already too routine. America’s online espionage campaign against Iran has been deeply controversial, both at home and abroad.”

Indeed it has become so deeply controversial that Russia has called “for a ban on cyberweapons like those that blocked poison gas or expanding bullets from the armies of major nations and other entities,” according to the New York Times.

“Here in the U.S., there’s a fear that, by unleashing Stuxnet and other military-grade malware, the Obama administration legitimized such attacks as a tool of statecraft — and invited other nations to strike our fragile infrastructure,” Danger Room rightly points out.

When our nation is openly legitimizing the assassination of our own citizens and claiming that secret reviews of classified evidence count as due process, we are only legitimizing that practice in the eyes of other nations since the U.S. often likes to paint itself as an example for the rest of the world.

Similarly, when we are launching cyberattacks that are easily linked back to us, we are only setting a quite troubling example for other nations to follow.

DARPA’s project is being led by Daniel Roelker, a hacker who “joined DARPA from Raytheon SI Government Solutions where he started the DC Black Ops unit which focused in developing break-through computer security technology.  Prior to that, he led the CNO Mission Applications section at BAE Systems Advanced Information Technologies transitioning multiple research projects throughout the DoD and intelligence communities,” according to the DARPA website.

“Mr. Roelker also helped start the intrusion detection company, Sourcefire, and was a lead Snort developer.  He received four patents for his innovation in the field, ranging from high-speed detection algorithms to anti-evasion techniques,” the website adds.

During a presentation in November 2011, Roelker spoke out against what he called the “hacker vs. hacker” approach to cyberwarfare.

Since this approach involves simply snatching up as many skilled individuals as possible and since there are obviously a finite number of these people on the face of the Earth, Roelker advocates a different approach.
“We don’t win wars by out-hiring an adversary, we win through technology,” said Roelker, which is exactly what Plan X is trying to do.
Back then, Roelker called the goal of creating a suite of cyberwarfare tools to first analyze the target, automate the execution of the attack itself and then quantify the results the “Pillars of Foundational Cyberwarfare.” Now, these pillars have been re-packed and re-branded simply as Plan X.
I believe that Plan X could very well be incredibly destructive due to the seeming ease and previously unimaginable speed with which attacks could be launched. Obviously this capability makes it much easier to execute attacks before enough information has been gathered.
The potential destruction which could be wrought by the U.S. and Israel’s cyberwarfare machine is already quite massive and enabling the attacks to be carried out even more swiftly likely means that more cyberattacks will be launched. Personally, I see this as nothing less than a recipe for disaster.

Note from End the Lie: Please support our work and help us start to pay contributors by doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.

This article originally appeared on End the Lie

The Manufactured US Veteran Threat Against Obama That Will Justify Martial Law

By Susanne Posel
theintelhub.com
August 23, 2012

Forget about al-Qaeda and state-sponsored radicalized Muslims, the newest Boogeyman that the US government wants the American public to fear are our own US veterans.

The US Armed Forces are preparing to fight what they call “rahowa” or racial holy war.

They claim that white supremacists are joining the military to infiltrate and overthrow what is referred to as the Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG).
Academics are proposing that the infiltration scheme include white supremacists hiding their ties to neo-Nazi groups in secret in order to get past screeners when applying for the armed forces in recruitment offices.
In reality, there is a great deal of former and current soldiers who have realized that our government has been taken over by the global Elite who are the front for the Zionist Movement that have been working in the shadows to instill global governance.

The mainstream media are using the false flag attack on the Sikh Temple because the patsy, Wade Michael Page was a US veteran who was purported to have ties to white supremacy groups, this according to the FBI-sponsored Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).

The Pentagon has banned military involvement in any group they deem a threat to the agenda of the US government.

Author Matt Kennard has written about how the US military would recruit members of supremacy groups when they could not fill in their ranks by normal means with what was called a “moral waiver”.

The SPLC and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) are working with the military to train soldiers on how to spot extremists in their ranks. These “watchdog groups” point out that some soldiers have tattoos that could be construed as racist.
We can look back at assassination attempts on Obama and see a pattern. They all have been US veterans who were somehow tied to white supremacy groups. This sets the stage for what could be the biggest false flag since 9/11.

Anton Caluori, resident of Federal Way in Washington State, was arrested by the Secret Service, assisted by paramilitary police, for making threats against President Barack Obama.

Caluori showed police his handgun when they came to his door.

He was a US veteran with an impeccable record. His mother told the MSM that her son has a legal permit for a handgun and that he had never done anything wrong in the past.

A neighbor who refused to be identified also remarked that Caluori was a quiet man who never bothered anyone; however he was being taken to a psychiatric hospital to be evaluated.
Another arbitrary witness claimed that Caluori was wearing an “ammunition belt like Rambo” when he met with the police.
The mainstream media is painting a picture of a man who threatened the police with his firearm.
Cathy Schrock, representative for the Federal Way police department said: “The shotgun was coming up to point in the direction of the agents. The two officers were able to close in and take control of the weapon before anyone was harmed.”
Curiously, the FBI says Caluori sent a threatening email to the FBI’s general email address, according to Emily Langlie, US attorney spokesperson. The details of the email are being kept secret  however Langlie believes that it was a clear threat to kill Obama.
Brian Leary, Secret Service spokesperson in Washington, DC, said that Caluori assaulted one of the police officers that came to arrest him. Leary goes on to say that the email Caluori allegedly sent was “alarming”.
According to Schorck, the police who accompanied the Secret Service claim that Caluori had improvised explosive devices (IEDs) in his apartment. The bomb squad was called to the scene. Although no explosives were found, the police continued to tout that they believed it was a viable threat.

This latest threat against Obama has justified the previous fears of possible assassination attempts by white supremacist groups who are upset about having an African-American president.

Although Congress passed legislation in 1994 stating that US Presidents would not have Secret Service protection during their lifetime, Obama has had federal agency protection in anticipation of an assassination attempt.
Despite the fact that the majority of the “threats” have been negative commentary criticizing Obama’s presidency, the Obama administration is convinced that a white supremacist will become a viable threat to Obama’s life.

In 2008, Shawn Robert Adolf and Tharin Robert Gartwell were arrested in Denver, Colorado for allegedly stating racist views against the Obama during a meth binge. The two men had rifles, sniper scopes and were reported to be focused on killing Obama before he could become the Democratic Presidential nominee.

That same year, a resident of Charlotte, North Carolina was arrested after having made known his supposed intentions to kidnap Obama and “inflict harm” while being in possession of a military grade sniper rifle.

In the MSM, a story about a Washington, DC police officer that made a threat against the First Lady to fellow officers surfaced, yet just as quickly disappeared.

Over breakfast, the officer allegedly said he would shoot Michelle Obama, the showed a picture of a gun he’d use on his cellular phone. Although the officer was not identified the idea was placed into the social meme. And it follows the plans cited by the DHS informant and lends credibility to his story.

In 2010, the Office of Intelligence and Analysis published a report entitled Rightwing Extremism , wherein domestic extremists, particularly white supremacists, were proposed to be the newest and most dangerous threat to the US since al-Qaeda.

Stated in the report, the DHS admitted that they had “no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.”

The DHS wanted to instill the idea that veterans were being recruited to become “right-wing extremists” upon returned from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Janet Napolitano intimated that military veterans could become instruments of domestic terror. When Napolitano’s comments were met with public distain, the DHS amended their assertion that extremist groups were highly-marked; but rather it was a lone wolf type that would carry out the biggest act of domestic terrorism.

A DHS whistleblower states that there is a planned false flag attack that will involve a staged assassination attempt on Obama linked to a white supremacist that will incite a race war. Because of the violence, the US government will have to implement martial law to control the population.

The DHS informant stated: “The DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States. He then corrected himself, stating that ‘a civil war’ is the more appropriate term. Certain elements of the government are not only expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it.”

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporate-funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

Election Fraud Remedy - Open Letter and Petition

http://electionfraudremedy.com/

Open letter to the RNC, Reince Priebus, and Mitt Romney: CLICK HERE

Sign the Petition to the RNC here: CLICK HERE

Here is the Press Release being sent. Help us get it to every media outlet in America! CLICK HERE

Lead Attorney For NDC Richard Gilbert Addresses
Mitt Romney’s Criminal Acts!

Lead attorney for the National Delegates Case, Richard Gilbert, addresses Mitt Romney’s criminal acts including his taking of money from foreign Israel contributors illegally, and his support of internment camp policies. Mr. Gilbert warns Romney of his election fraud crimes and that he should be ready to be arrested when he shows up in Tampa or harms a Ron Paul delegate at the national “organized crime convention.” Watch video below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxaBqnRosdo&feature=player_embedded

Richard Gilbert Takes on Romney – Romney NDAA

Richard Gilbert is now addressing the Romney delegates directly. He is trying to help them to understand how the “organized crime convention” is being set up to nominate their crime boss, Mitt Romney so that as President he can incarcerate Americans in concentration camps and use drones to spy on American citizens.

Romney’s 8.5 billion dollar Ponzi scheme should also be considered as these citizens “vote their conscience” in Tampa. Here are Parts One and Part Two of this on-going video series. More information coming soon. Please watch, download and share far and wide!

ARE YOU A NATIONAL DELEGATE OR ALTERNATE?

The purpose of this lawsuit is to obtain an answer to a legal question. That question is whether you should be bound to the state party rules and statutes, or whether you should follow the federal laws found in 42 USC 1971-1974 to be unbound to vote your conscience at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida in August, 2012.

We are asking the federal Judge, David Carter to answer this question. We have asked National Delegates and Alternates, as well as state and district delegates and alternates to become plaintiffs from the fifty states in order to clarify this question.

On Monday, August 6, 2012, a hearing is scheduled in the 9th Circuit in Santa Anna, California on the Motion to Dismiss the case filed by the RNC against our plaintiffs.

Lead attorney for the lawsuit, Richard Gilbert has recently prepared a video explaining to Romney Delegates why they should reconsider voting for Mitt Romney if the delegates are declared unbound to vote their consciences at the Republican Convention.

Click Here to view the video.

In that video, Mr. Gilbert mentions that the U.S. Army has an Internment and Resettlement Manual prepared for incarcerating Americans in concentration camps on American soil. Please click here to learn more about this document.

Lead Attorney Richard Gilbert filed an Appeal to the 9th Circuit Court

On August 16, 2012 Lead Attorney Richard Gilbert filed an Appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to make certain that the decision of Judge David O. Carter would be made prior to the Republican National Convention. Click Here to see the appeal document.

ELECTION FRAUD – ARE YOU A VICTIM OF VOTING FRAUD?

Help stop election fraud and voting fraud to restore integrity in America. ToolsForJustice is working in partnership with Lawyers for Ron Paul, WatchtheVote2012.com, RonPaulVoteCount.org, and WTPNetwork.com acting as a private, secure, centralized clearinghouse to support all concerned citizens to enforce our voting rights and restore integrity to the election process by gathering evidence of election fraud and voting fraud through our members in our private forum.

We want to document voting rights violations and election fraud abuses committed during the Republican primaries in preparation for filing a 42 USC Section 1983 lawsuit for violations of our voting rights, 42 USC Sections 1971-1974. We invite all concerned organizations to join us. Be part of this effort.

Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgement and Relief

On August 7, 2012, Judge David O. Carter of the 9th Circuit Court in California ruled on the motion to dismiss by the Republican National Committee against the National Delegates Case. Please click here for the complete amended complaint filed by Lead Attorney Richard Gilbert in response to the judge’s decision. Please CLICK HERE for the complete transcript.

CLICK HERE to see the Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss submitted on July 17, 2012.

Judge David O. Carter ordered Attorney Richard Gilbert to “show cause”

Judge David O. Carter ordered Attorney Richard Gilbert to “show cause why this court should not construe plaintiff’s notice of appeal as a desire to stand upon the first amended complaint.”

Click Here to see Attorney Gilbert’s “PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE” filed Tuesday evening, August 20, 2012 in the U.S. 9th Circuit in Santa Ana.

PLEASE CAREFULLY READ SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
FOR ALL NEW TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE

As of July 14, 2012, you will need to submit your affidavit and evidence as per instructions directly to Attorney Richard Gilbert’s office, as we are no longer accepting new evidence or testimony through our Election Fraud Remedy and Tools For Justice websites or physical locations.
For Instructions please CLICK HERE

To Become a Plaintiff: Please fill in the survey form on the Join Lawsuit page.
Or call: 229-393-2912 / 850-417-8543 / 561-747-8496

NOTE: We are committed to providing legal and paralegal support free-of-charge for this matter exclusively.

Submit Evidence

Pages

• Home
• Join Lawsuit
• News
• Recorded Calls
• Videos

Categories

• National Delegates Case Updates
• Uncategorized

TRUTH OF WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE 2012 'ELECTION'

I CANNOT ENCOURAGE YOU STRONG ENOUGH - YOU MUST READ THIS SO THAT YOU ARE AWARE OF THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE 2012 'ELECTION' - THE DEMS AND THE REPUBS

http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/07/19/military-insider-president-obama-by-any-means-necessary/

MILITARY INSIDER: President Obama – “By Any Means Necessary”

by Ulsterman on July 19, 2012  

For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”. What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”. For those who have followed these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be. Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.

PART ONE:

UM: Can we begin?

WSI: (Broad smile) Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.

UM: I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better. Out of the woods?

WSI: No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will. But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet! (laughs)

UM: Why did you decide to invite him here? I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?

WSI: Certainly. I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person. I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.

UM: How long have you known each other?

WSI: (Looks over at MI) That would be…nearly twenty years? Perhaps a bit more?

MI: Twenty three years.

WSI: That long? Really?

MI: Just over twenty-three years. That’s correct.

UM: Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?

MI: No.

WSI: I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago. Shortly after the election…in 2008. Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made. That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake. Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.

UM: Can you expand on that? Those concerns. What were they?

WSI: You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path. A number of times.

UM: I’d like to hear it from him. If that’s ok. Their perspective. Unfiltered. Like you just said you wanted.

(Military Insider looks at WSI)

WSI: If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine. But I would caution there is a great deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was. I would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some hope is to be.

UM: We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those concerns that pushed us to this point, right? So if you’re comfortable with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those concerns back then. After 2008. Or before 2008 if there were concerns before then.

MI: There were.

UM: Concerns? Before 2008? About Obama?

MI: Yes.

UM: What were they?

MI: The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against the military. That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off – or most of us. At least those of us not put in place by the communists. The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.

UM: Did you just say communists? In the U.S. military?

MI: Yes.

UM: Please – can you please explain that.

MI: Communists. Communist supporters. Sympathizers. Or socialists. Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term. Big government…One World…that whole concept. It’s real. As real these chairs. That wall. The air in your lungs
.

UM: Agenda 21? That conspiracy theory? And the United States military?

MI: Yes – not a conspiracy. It’s real. It exists. And it’s happening right now.

UM: Agenda 21 is non-binding.

MI: That is…not accurate.

UM: No – it’s a non-binding agreement. It’s…it was more a show than anything of substance.

MI: No sir. You are wrong. Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was the intended outcome of calling it that.

UM: What?

MI: Non-binding. Voluntary.

UM: But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the environmentalists.

MI: It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted within that document choose to act on that authority.

UM: What?

MI: That document was a blueprint. Have you actually read it?

UM: Not…not all of it. No.

MI: Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?

UM: I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists running the United States military.

MI: That’s not what I said.

UM: You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.

MI: No.

UM: Ok…you explain to me what you just said. About the communists, the globalists…all of that. What did you say?

MI: You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama? Before the 2008 election.

UM: Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in place by the communists. That’s what you said. Right?

MI: Yes.

UM: So – what’s the problem?

MI: What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military. You said that. Not me.

UM: What’s the difference?

MI: Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military. They are not running the U.S. military. That is a distinction of epic proportions. You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world – all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.

WSI: And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time. It’s been happening right under our noses.

UM: It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?

MI: Incorrect.

UM: What?

MI: Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era. It was developed long before that. In fact, it culminated under President Bush. HW.

WSI: But it goes back much farther than that. I only learned of this more recently myself.

MI: Yes sir – much farther. Decades of planning. A multiple series of five year plans.

UM: Five year plans?

WSI: Just like Stalin. A slow progression…a creeping monster that comes in five year increments. Cutting away at freedom and liberty and individuality.

MI: Yes sir. Just like that.

UM: So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?

MI: You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.

UM: Fair enough – I apologize for that.

MI: Accepted.

WSI: He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were. Please – continue.

MI: Yes sir.

(Pause)

Decades ago. The first official mark goes back to the early 1970’s. The birth of the modern environmental movement. Are you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism became the fixture of a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.

Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have been members of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood the implications. These people are not conspiracy nuts. These people are patriots who understand the threat. The country – the United States, is under siege. It has been going on for a long time. Decades of planning. And now the planning stage is being transitioned into the implementation stage. Right now. It’s happening now.

WSI: And you are absolutely convinced of that? It’s happening now – the election of Barack Obama was the signal? Implementation of this globalization plan commenced at that time? Fully commenced? Right?

MI: Yes sir.

UM: How? (Pause) The…implementation? How does that work. By force? Using our own military against us?

MI: No. That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are good men and women. They signed up. They took an oath. And they are doing their job. Remember, I indicated some inside the military were part of this globalization movement. Not all. Not most. But some.

UM: But some of these inside the military – they have influence?

MI: Yes. Appointed to positions of authority. By this administration.

UM: The Secretary of State? Panetta? I thought he was the real hero of the Bin Laden raid?

MI: He acted outside his direct authority. That action had little to nothing to do with the best interests of the United States.

UM: What do you mean?

MI: (Looks toward WSI)

UM: (Repeats question) What do you mean?

WSI: What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting to. The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name deleted-. It means nothing to me. Nothing.

UM: So you don’t trust him?

WSI: No – I do not. I’ve never trusted any of them.

UM: Who?

WSI: Politicians. That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election. I find them all distasteful to some degree. Even the best of them.

UM: But you’re voting this time – in 2012.

WSI: That’s correct. While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.

UM: And what’s that?

WSI: Dangerous.

UM: So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without coming off…without sounding…

WSI: Crazy?

UM: Yeah – crazy.

WSI: That’s how it’s intended. Do that which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into submission while continuing on with your work. Call it outlandish, crazy, ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they accuse of.

These Obama people are quite good at that.

UM: So the globalization thing…the plan…Agenda 21…it’s not just a Democrat thing?

MI: Correct.

UM: Republicans have gone along with it too?

MI: Correct. Let me clarify that a bit. If that’s ok?

UM: Please do.

MI: The architects are embedded within the various liberal sub groups, all of which are under the umbrella of today’s Democratic Party. They have been the ones to push this agenda – THE AGENDA…for the past several decades. There are Republicans…there have been Republicans, sympathetic to the superficial aspects of the plan.

(Long pause)

UM: You lost me. I get the liberal groups…I will assume the unions, the environmental groups…they are all in on the globalization plan. I get that. What do you mean by the superficial aspects of the plan? The…that part of it that attracts some Republicans?

WSI: If I may?

MI: Yes sir.

WSI: This is where the big money comes into play. Take for example, General Electric. A huge corporation with multiple subsidiaries…it is itself, a working, breathing, functioning, ever-evolving manifestation of this globalization movement. Massive amounts of dollars are spent developing public relations campaigns that infest the very fabric of the public conscience. Movies, television, music, fashion, consumable goods…it all becomes part of the implementation plan. Global cooling becomes global warming becomes climate change becomes sustainable resources…each of those are reading from the very same script.

And so as these concepts grow in popularity among the public…politicians bend their own vision to those concepts. They may do so not knowing of course the true motivations of those who have invented said concepts, but nevertheless, they become tools of the plan. They become that all-important “bi-partisan” support of those plans.

UM: So what’s the purpose of all of it? The plan? Globalization? Why? What’s the end goal?

WSI: First, and for us at this very moment, most important – is the total and irreversible transformation of the United States. If that is achieved – as the man calling himself Obama and all those who support him and have placed him in the White House…if that is achieved, then we are looking at a true one-world government ruled by a small group of elite who will control all aspects of production, dissemination of resources, how you are born, how you live, and how and when you are to die. There is a group who believes they will have a seat at that table of power – Big Labor, particular globalized financial institutions, certain business entities, they all share in a belief that the individual is simply too dumb, too un-evolved, to have to suffer through life on their own. They want to be told what to do. What to think. How to live.

UM: (turning to MI) Do you agree with that – it’s really that far-reaching? That’s where President Obama wants to take America? Take the world?

MI: Yes. I know it.

UM: How?

MI: (Looks to WSI)

WSI: Go ahead.

MI: Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information pertaining to an election contingency plan. For 2012. After the 2010 elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need to secure a second term for President Obama. That document’s title was…(pauses)

WSI: He can be trusted – I give you my word. Please proceed.

MI: That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”. It was unofficial – but we know it came directly from channels specific to the administration. We confirmed that.

UM: What channels? Who are you talking about?

MI: We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein. Reviewed and approved by Valerie Jarrett. Preparations for implementation are being done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S. military.

UM: Leo Gerard? The union leader? How would he play a part in this?

WSI: Mr. Gerard has direct experience in toppling a government working directly with similar forces that would be in play here in the United States. You did some work on that…perhaps look more closely at what exactly happened in Brazil. It was a coup. An overthrow of government. A joint effort between Big Labor and certain business groups in which law enforcement helped facilitate the final push.

Brazil was a regime change orchestrated by Leo Gerard and soon after personally and financially congratulated by the President of the United States.

What is now being planned for the United States is not regime change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America that can only be assured by a second presidential term.

That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been titled, is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.

PART TWO OF THIS INTERVIEW COMING SOON.