Wednesday, September 5, 2012

GOING ON THE OFFENSIVE AGAINST THE IRS

CONFERENCE CALL

S P E C I A L  
A N N O U N C E M E N T
 
SPECIAL  GUEST  SPEAKER
Mr. Barry "Bear" Smyth
YOU WON'T WANT TO MISS THIS CALL 
BE ON THE WEDNESDAY CALL - 9PM EST / 6PM PACIFIC

www.FreedomsRadio.com
GOING ON THE OFFENSIVE
AGAINST THE IRS

TOMMY CRYER RECOMMENDED IT BEFORE HE DIED
AND SO DO I!!

Someone forwarded this email to Tommy Cryer and he commented on it the night before he died. His comments are at the bottom.

After § 7433 Suit Filed, IRS Attitude Changes for the Better:

I’m kind of excited. I just got word of what appeared to be a total change of heart by the IRS after receiving a final notice of intent to sue followed by the actual filing of a suit under 26 U.S.C. § 7433.

The IRS had made this couple promises and was not keeping them. When the couple started taking the IRS to task for not keeping the promises they gave them still more runaround. This is such a typical story that I hear all the time.

The couple had already sent a notice of intent to sue based on § 7433. But, when the couple sent a final warning that they intended to file suit and then actually did file the suit, theIRS had change of heart and became kinder and more gentle. They began to leave polite messages on the voice mail and seemed to become very sincere about correcting the errors. It appeared that they were concerned that their actions had resulted in the suit being filed and inquired about the status of the suit.

Beneficial Features of Section 7433:

As you may recall, 26 U.S.C. § 7433(a) provides:

If, in connection with any collection of Federal tax with respect to a taxpayer, any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of this title, or any regulation promulgated under this title, such taxpayer[1] may bring a civil action for damages against the United States in a district court of the United States.

But, subsection (d) provides limitations:

(1) A judgment for damages shall not be awarded under subsection (b) unless the court determines that the plaintiff has exhausted the administrative remedies

As some of you know, I’ve been a proponent of using the exhaustion requirement to our advantage. 26 CFR 301.7433-1(e) provides:

An administrative claim…shall be sent in writing to the Area Director, Attn: Compliance Technical Support Manager of the area in which the taxpayer currently resides.

Administrative Claim Letter Success:

Letters sent in compliance with this provision have met with some success.

In all, I am aware of seven instances where levees were released after one of these letters was sent.

I had always said that there was a possibility that somebody would get a check as a result of these letters. A while back that actually happened. Somebody combined my lien and levy research in their letter and got a check back for over $6,000 of wrongfully levied funds from the IRS.

Government Does Not Want More Litigation:

I recently got some additional insight as to the distastefulness of litigation to the government when I read the book The Price of Loyalty by Ron Suskind, Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2004. The book is about Paul O’Neill’s 1.5 year stint as Secretary of the Treasury. He was trying to make some changes in the ways that executives of corporations were treated. The results will become self-evident as you read:

On page 225:
Shifting the standard to negligence is a huge problem,the SEC chairman said. We just can’t go there. There’s no doubt that we have to prevent gaming the system. But we need a high standard, otherwise we’ll be overwhelmed with litigation.

On page 230:
Three days later, a story ran in the Wall Street Journal about O’Neill’s position on corporate governance and his desire to lift the standard from recklessness to simple negligence. It mentioned that Pitt and Hubbard were against the new standard, “concerned that no matter how it was crafted it will lead to more lawsuits.”

At page 233:

Many of the CEOs seemed to have consulted already with their chief counsels. The one thing they didn’t want was even the slightest uptick in litigation.

At page 239:

The move from recklessness to negligence was dropped for fear it would invite a wave of lawsuits. O’Neill and Greenspan were discouraged. A single issue for the corporate crowd—fear of lawsuits—carried the day, O’Neill said, his outrage boiling over.

So, big corporations and big government, with all of their attorneys and resources, as I suspected, do not want more litigation. An administrative claim for damages, or notice of intent to sue, gives us an opportunity to take advantage of the government’s distaste for litigation.

Success after the Suit has been Filed:

There have been reports of no results from administrative claim letters, but, after hearing about the results described in the first paragraph of this e-mail, it got me to thinking about the results I found in the case law after the suit was filed; for example:

1) Mrs. Shaw received a refund of all the money collected, and the remaining tax liability was abatedShaw v. U.S., Fifth Circuit. 

2) After filing one of these suits, the governmentdismissed the criminal action against the 7433 plaintiff.  Fishburn v. Brown, Sixth Circuit, 1997. 

3) After filing one of these suits, the IRS returned a seized Cadillac.  Washington v. U.S., Ninth Circuit, 1992.  FE

4) After filing one of these suits, the plaintiff's tax liability "was resolved in the plaintiff's favor in tax court.  Templeman v. U.S., First Circuit, 1994. 

5) After filing one of these suits, an injunction restricting state court filings was vacatedTempleman v. U.S., First Circuit, 1994.

6) After filing one of these suits, improperly levied funds were returned.  Raymond v. U.S., Sixth Circuit, 1993.

7) After filing one of these suits, the government conceded that an assessment was erroneous andreleased its liens.  Miller v. U.S. (N.D. Cal. 1992).

8) The government provided the forms during the litigation that they had previously refused toBall v.U.S., No. 94-2125 (7th Cir. 1995).

It Is Possible to Win Damages off a Section 7433 Suit:

Let’s not forget the 5th Circuit case Gandy Nursery v. U.S.where $388,500 in damages were awarded and $317,738.50 in costs and attorney's fees; plus, post-judgment interest on the $16,800.  

Some Suggestions for Those Dealing With IRS:

If you already sent your claim letter:

26 CFR 301.7433-1(d) provides that, “…no action under paragraph (a) of this section shall be maintained in any federal district court before the earlier of the following dates: (i)The date the decision is rendered on a claim filed in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section; or (ii) The date six months after the date an administrative claim is filed…”

If you had a decision on your administrative claim letter, you cango ahead and file your suit, or, you can do like the couple in the first paragraph and send them a warning letter.

If you send an administrative claim letter and less than six months has passed you may want to send a warning lettertelling them that the six month deadline is approaching; and that they may want to take action.

If you send an administrative claim letter and more than six months has passed you have the option of sending the warning letter or filing suit.

If you have one of my packages, but have not sent a section 7433 letter:

You may want to go into my package and locate the file 26USC7433. If you need to search your hard drive you should quickly find the file if you search for exactly this: 26USC7433. Once you locate it you should review the notes files and the sample letters. You should also review the statute and the regulation which are here:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7433

I’m sure these have changed since you bought my package. Locate some statutes and regulations that the IRS violated and you will be ready to put together your letter. I am available to review letters.

If you do not have one of my packages, but think it would benefit you to send an administrative claim letter:

My research packages amount to what I call a “shortcut to competence”. If you follow the statute and the regulation there is somebody on the other end that is going to be reading your letter. Because of this, you want your letter to display a certain degree of competence. It must appear in your letter that you’ve done your homework. A competent letter is the shortest route to success; and may save you from having to file suit is available.

You’ll see you will see THE BIGGEST PACKAGE! THE BIGGEST SAVINGS! This package includes Lien & Levy Thumper-IRS Terminator for CDPH-All Angles Offensive MP3’s-Frivolous Return Penalties Research-Bear’s Online Legal Research Video & Golden FOIAs. This package is normally $577. until September 15th, 2012 when you enterCryerMemorial2 during the checkout process you will save $207 and be able to get the package for just $370. That’s more than a $1200 savings over what you would pay for these packages separately! Plus, I’m giving a large chunk of what you pay me to Michael Edward so he can continue to work with you through American’s Restoring America.

I’m convinced that filing one of these letters, sending a warning letter, and filing suit is one of the quickest and most effective ways of getting some respect from the IRS.

Knowing what your rights are is the first step to getting them:

When the IRS violates our due process rights, most people feel bad. The bad feeling is what tells you that your rights have been violated. However, the bad feeling should only be the trigger that sets in motion a search for the authority, usually from the Supreme Court, establishing the right and explaining it. Understanding this concept is what set me on a search for Supreme Court decisions explaining due process rights.

If the IRS agent fails to give you all your constitutional rights he could lose his job. I made a video about this and you can view it at the link above. I call this package HOW TO HOLD IRS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS over THEIR HEAD. This is a tremendous lever to use against IRS personnel, the threat of the loss of their job. Normally I sell this package for $200. Through September 15th, 2012, when you enterCryerMemorial2 in the coupon code blank on check out you will save $100 and be able to buy these quotes for $100; a 50% savings! Again, while you are helping yourself, you will be helping Michael Edward and American’s Restoring America because I will be giving his organization a large portion of what you pay for this package.

NOTE: If you would like to get both of these packages you must make separate purchases because the shopping cart will only accept one discount code at a time.

SWEETENING THE POT:
42 USC § 1983 RESEARCH

Since I first started researching how to inflict some pain on the system for IRS law violations 42 USC § 1983 has been amended. It used to only apply to the several states but, the new amendment now makes suits for civil rights violations applicable in Washington D.C., the very seat of the federal government and home of the IRS. Furthermore, the statute has always applied to state actors working in a state tax agency that violate your rights. For everyone who takes advantage of BOTH of the above offers [The Biggest Package and Due Process Quotes] I will send you, in a zip file, 901 paragraphs of research I’ve done on how to do a § 1983 suit as an attachment in the email for NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE!! That will give you a nice head start on how to do a § 1983 suit. 

I hope this email has been some help to you and given you some hope. Bear

CRYER EMAIL:

[From my buddy Tim who retained Tommy to defend against the IRS]:

“Thought you might like to see this.”

“-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
Re: Giving the IRS an Attitude Adjustment
Date:
Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:34:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:
To:

“Tim,

“I know Barry and he's a serious researcher and dedicated patriot.  He's onto something here that I've been advocating for a long, long time.  We cannot win by letting the enemy choose all the battles.  We have to pick our own battlefields and our own cases.  And we can't gain ground defending.  We have to go on the offense. 

“Lawsuits such as 7433's and 7431's, as well, can go a long way toward, just as Barry puts it, "giving them an attitude adjustment".” 


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++




[1] The Supreme Court has held that there are two kinds of taxpayers: 1) the taxpayer from whom the tax is sought to be collected; 2) the taxpayer that is subject to the Internal Revenue Code. The court held that a non-taxpayer could not be deprived of remedies under the Code by virtue of that status.

~*~
For more information .......

Contact: Martin Michaelsson:   MM@YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com
Brought to you by....
www.AmericansRestoringAmerica.com 

The Phone Numbers and Pins are published at http://www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com behind the Free Tele-Conference tab. Enter with your User Name and Password. If you don’t have one, click on “New? REGISTER HERE” and create your unique User Name and Password. Information is available only to registered members. Click on Free Tele-Conference Calls and you will see the correct information.

PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL YOUR GROUPS AND LISTS

So, if you want to learn how you can accomplish this Offensive Posture for yourself, listen to and participate in the Free Tele-Conference Calls most every evening of the week. See the 'Free Tele-Conferences' TAB at www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com, AND THE NEW CALENDAR TAB. There are also the Archives to view two years of historical conference calls!

Best regards,

ME

Click one of the links below to learn more about our self-help courses, or to order your copy today:
The Leader in Step-by-Step Lawsuit Self-Help . . . On the Web Since 1997
Case-Winning Lawsuit Procedure for Non-Lawyers ... Learn How-to-Win In Just 24 Hours !

I also encourage you to purchase the 24 hour JurisDictionary Course found at the products and services page at www.YourRemedyIsInTheLaw.com. This course is the absolute minimum entry level for anyone who is anticipating having to deal with a lawful issue. It will be the best 24 hours you have ever spent! I have heard it said this course, when completely understood by you, could put you on par with 85% of the lawyers you may come across.

DISCLAIMER: Legal Information is NOT the same as Legal Advice This site provides entertainment/educational information about law designed to help users safely cope with their own legal needs. But legal educational information is not the same as legal advice. The application of law varies with an individual's specific circumstances. The laws of every state are in constant change, and although we go to great lengths to make sure our information is accurate and useful, we recommend you consult a lawyer if you want professional assurance that our information, and your interpretation of it is appropriate to your particular situation.

SPAM: We Support Responsible Email Compliance: This email cannot be considered spam as long as we include: Contact information & remove instructions. This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.4176 - SECTION 101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress.

UNSUBSCRIBE: Not responsible for typographical errors. Further transmissions to you may be stopped immediately and at no cost to you by clicking this Email Database Removal Link and clicking the Confirm button. Contact Information: Most Affordable Marketing - Administrator 839 Royalwood Lane Oviedo, Florida 32765

SOCIAL SECURITY NOW CALLED 'FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT /ENTITLEMENT!


SOCIAL SECURITY NOW CALLED 'FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT /ENTITLEMENT!


Have you noticed, your Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?

I 'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.
The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a “Federal Benefit Payment.”;
This isn’t a benefit – its earned income!
Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes. If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that 's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security.

If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both your and your employer’s contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you 'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved! This is your personal investment.

Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you 'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month.
That’s almost three times more than today’s average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month,
according to the Social Security Administration (Google it - it’s a fact).
And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you 're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.
Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere. They “forgot” that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn’t have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn’t pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently, they’ve told us that the money won’t support us for very much longer. But is it our fault they misused our investments?
And now, to add insult to injury, they’re calling it a “benefit,” as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Just because they “borrowed” the money, doesn 't mean that our investments were a charity!
Let’s take a stand. We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government – Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going, for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.
Here’s a novel idea: Reduce the military budget to support our own population. Get out of the countries who don’t want us there. Bring our soldiers home and invest some of the $700B+ in giving them new careers
building roads and parks, teaching our children, creating new technologies, discovering cures for illness.
Then take the rest and begin to pay back Social Security, and call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.
99% of people won 't forward this.

Will you?

OBAMA SUFFERS AMNESIA BLAMING BUSH FOR THE ECONOMY


OBAMA SUFFERS AMNESIA BLAMING BUSH FOR THE ECONOMY
 Dems pumped subprime mortgage market, triggering banking collapse
Published: 19 hours ago
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Where's the REAL Birth Certificate?"More Less

120904obama
In the current narrative presented by Democratic Party operatives, the banking industry collapse of September 2008 was caused by tax cuts under George W. Bush and supply-side economics tracing back to the era of Ronald Reagan.
The narrative, however, ignores the personal responsibility Barack Obama and Democratic Party operatives played in creating the subprime mortgage market, beginning with the passage of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.

The 2008 banking collapse was triggered by a series of failures in the mortgage-backed securities market resulting from massive defaults in the subprime mortgage market and derivatives supporting the mortgage market that caused Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns to go bankrupt. Financial giants such as Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Merrill Lynch and AIG threatened to follow suit, as detailed by the Guardian of London.
As WND reported in May 2009, Obama himself played a role as an activist lawyer in Chicago, representing ACORN in the 1994 case Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Federal Savings Bank. In the case, ACORN pressed Citibank to make more loans to marginally qualified African-American applicants “in a race neutral way.”
ACORN Housing, then a nationwide organization with offices in more than 30 cities, used the Citibank litigation to push the group’s radical agenda to get subprime homebuyers mortgages under the most favorable terms available.
Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
The Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter in 1977 with the goal of forcing banks to provide credit to businesses and homeowners with poor credit.
The CRA’s purpose was to stop banks from “red-lining,” or refusing to lend to people in low-income areas because the risk of the loan not being repaid was too high.
Even though lending to people with poor credit is inherently risky, the Carter administration was intent on forcing banks to accept a social responsibility to provide credit to homeowners and businesses in low-income neighborhoods.
The CRA was super-charged during the Clinton administration with a set of new rules that allowed subprime mortgages to be securitized.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a speech to the Community Affairs Research Conference in Washington, D.C., on March 30, 2007, noted a 1992 law passed during the Clinton administration expanded the CRA market by requiring the government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to securitize “affordable housing loans,” a euphemism widely understood to mean low-income housing loans.
Clinton expands subprime mortgage market
Securitization of mortgages into bonds, a process that became a multi-trillion-dollar business in the 1990s, increased dramatically the liquidity, or amount of money available, to make new home loans.
Because mortgage originators could sell their mortgages to investment bankers, creating mortgage-backed securities, mortgage originators did not have to hold the mortgage in their portfolio. As a result, mortgage lenders could more easily engage in riskier lending, including lending to less qualified buyers in the subprime market.
By allowing CRA-generated and other subprime mortgages to be included in mortgage-backed securities, the Clinton administration advanced a social agenda to extend homeownership into inner-city poverty, where prospective homeowners were typically not qualified to obtain a mortgage.
By definition, subprime lenders are not credit-worthy under normal lending standards. They typically cannot meet normal lending requirements to verify income and have a history of credit problems.
Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner, in their 2011 book “Reckless Endangerment,” detailed how the subprime mortgage crisis resulted in the collapse of financial institutions in September 2008. The authors demonstrated, as noted on page 3 of the book, how Clinton’s “calamitous” homeownership strategy developed and “came to blow up the economy.” The authors calls it a “story of greed, good intentions, corporate corruption and government support.”
In the aftermath of the U.S. government takeover of Fannie and Freddie, attention focused on three prominent Democrats who served as Fannie Mae executives: Franklin D. Raines, former Clinton administration budget director; James Johnson, former aide to Democratic Vice President Walter Mondale; and Jamie Gorelick, former Clinton administration deputy attorney general.
All three prominent Democrats earned millions in questionable compensation while serving as top Fannie Mae executives.
Raines earned $90 million in his five years as Fannie Mae CEO, from 1999 to 2004; Johnson earned $21 million in just his last year serving as Fannie Mae CEO, serving from 1991 to 1998; and Gorelick earned an estimated $26 million serving as vice chair of Fannie Mae from 1998 to 2003.
All three were subsequently involved in mortgage-related financial scandals concerning their stewardship at Fannie Mae.
Franklin Raines
Franklin Raines’ problems began in 2004, when Fannie Mae’s regulator, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, or OFHEO, and the Security and Exchange Commission’s top accountant issued reports charging that under Raines’ stewardship Fannie Mae had misstated earnings for three and a half years.
The $9 billion restatement of earnings required by the OFHEO and SEC ended up wiping out 40 percent of Fannie Mae’s originally stated profits from 2001 to mid-2004.
Raines resigned from Fannie Mae in December 2004, with a $19 million severance package.
Raines continued playing the victim until April 2008, when he and two other Fannie Mae top executives were ordered in a civil lawsuit to pay nearly $31.4 million for their roles in what amounted to an Enron-like accounting scandal.
Raines and the other Fannie Mae executives were accused in the civil suit of manipulating Fannie Mae books to manufacture earnings over a six-year period that stretched from 1998 through 2004 to trigger for themselves millions of dollars in otherwise unearned bonuses.
In the final settlement, Raines was also forced to give up Fannie Mae stock options then valued at $15.6 million.
A controversy broke out when the Washington Post noted in July 2008 Raines had taken calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.
Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain ran a television advertisement using the Post article as a source to claim Raines was an Obama adviser. But Raines issued a denial that he was an adviser to Obama or that he had provided the Obama campaign with advice on housing or economic matters.
In September 2008, as the controversy developed, the Washington Post stood behind its original report, noting Raines statement that month that he never provided Obama’s campaign with advice on housing or economic matters contradicted what he told the newspaper in July 2008.
James Johnson
James Johnson was appointed to head Obama’s vice presidential selection committee until a controversy concerning an alleged $7 millions in questionable real estate loans he received on favorable terms from failed sub-prime mortgage lender Countrywide Financial surfaced and forced him to resign.
The controversy over Johnson began when the Wall Street Journal reported June 7, 2008, that Countrywide had extended to Johnson and Raines millions of dollars in favorable home loans because they were “Friends of Angelo,” or “FoA,” as such preferential borrowers were known in the inner circles of Countrywide.
The Wall Street Journal carefully noted there is nothing illegal about a mortgage firm treating some borrowers better than others.
Yet, when two top Fannie Mae executives received the preferential mortgage treatment, it spelled political trouble for the government-sponsored, shareholder-owned company, as well as for the Democratic Party and the Obama presidential campaign with which Raines and Johnson were connected.
A lawyer for Johnson insisted to the Wall Street Journal that Johnson’s Countrywide home mortgage loans were within industry practice; Raines did not respond to the newspaper’s requests to comment.
Jamie Gorelick
In 1998, Fannie Mae Vice Chairman Jamie S. Gorelick received a bonus of $779,625, despite her alleged involvement in a scandal in which Fannie Mae employees falsified signatures on accounting transactions to manipulate books to meet 1998 earning targets. The targets, in turn, triggered multi-million-dollar bonuses for top executives, including Gorelick.
The 1998 bonus reported for then-Fannie Mae Chairman and CEO James Johnson was $1.932 million. Then-Chairman-designate Raines received $1.11 million.
After leaving Fannie Mae, Gorelick encountered controversy a second time, over an alleged conflict of interest when a 1995 memo she authored as deputy attorney general at the Justice Department during the Clinton administration surfaced while she was a member of the 9/11 commission.
The memo, which outlined a policy that became known as the “Gorelick Wall,” appeared to put in place barriers that barred federal anti-terrorist criminal investigators from accessing various federal records and databases that may have assisted them in their criminal investigations.

Stroke has a new indicator - S T R

Stroke has a new indicator 

They say if you e.mail this to ten people, you stand a chance of saving one life. Will you send this along? Blood Clots/Stroke - They Now Have a Fourth Indicator, the Tongue.

I will continue to forward this every time it comes around!

STROKE:
Remember the 1st Three Letters..... S. T. R.

STROKE IDENTIFICATION:


During a BBQ, a woman stumbled and took a little fall - she assured everyone that she was fine (they offered to call paramedics) ...she said she had just tripped over a brick because of her new shoes.

They got her cleaned up and got her a new plate of food. While she appeared a bit shaken up, Jane went about enjoying herself the rest of the evening.

Jane's husband called later telling everyone that his wife had been taken to the hospital - (at 6:00 PM Jane passed away.) She had suffered a stroke at the BBQ. Had they known how to identify the signs of a stroke, perhaps Jane would be with us today. Some don't die. They end up in a helpless, hopeless condition instead.

It only takes a minute to read this.

A neurologist says that if he can get to a stroke victim within 3 hours he can totally reverse the effects of a stroke...totally. He said the trick was getting a stroke recognized, diagnosed, and then getting the patient medically cared for within 3 hours, which is tough.
 

RECOGNIZING A STROKE

Thank God for the sense to remember the '3' steps, STR. Read and

Learn!

Sometimes symptoms of a stroke are difficult to identify. Unfortunately, the lack of awareness spells disaster. The stroke victim may suffer severe brain damage when people nearby fail to recognize the symptoms of a stroke.

Now doctors say a bystander can recognize a stroke by asking three simple questions:


S *
Ask the individual to SMILE.

T *
Ask the person to TALK and SPEAK A
SIMPLE SENTENCE (Coherently)
(i.e. Chicken Soup)

R
*Ask him or her to RAISE BOTH ARMS.

If he or she has trouble with ANY ONE of these tasks, call emergency number immediately and describe the symptoms to the dispatcher.


New Sign of a Stroke -------- Stick out Your Tongue


NOTE: Another 'sign' of a stroke is this: Ask the person to 'stick' out his tongue. If the tongue is
'crooked', if it goes to one side or the other
 that is also an indication of a stroke.

A cardiologist says if everyone who gets this e-mail sends it to 10 people; you can bet that at least one life will be saved.

I have done my part. Will you?

DEPORT HER TO AMERICA !




Well as with everything else each person must decided for his or herself. As for me it's just plain common sense and HISTORY. No nation can be subjugated and enslaved unless the people are helpless to defend themselves and their property. Law Enforcement does not and is not in the business of "preventing" crime. That is not their job and that's a good thing because if it was they would be the single most inept organization in history in carrying out their duty. There is no way for police to protect you beforehand, they can only mop up the aftermath and attempt to catch the perpetrators and then turn them over to the corrupt court system for prosecution. I don't know about you but that just doesn't make me feel all warm and fuzzy and safe. The fact that I now own a weapon and know how to use it makes me feel at least capable of protecting me and mine from those who would intend to harm. Law abiding people do not go around shooting people, criminals do and criminals will never hand over their guns no matter what laws are passed DUH! THAT'S WHAT MAKES THEM CRIMINALS!

I have many friends around the globe in disarmed countries and their stories are a mirror image of this one from Australia. Hello my fellow American's stop listening to the idiots on the mainstream scripted news and start listening to people who are LIVING what we are being told is the right, safe and humane thing to do... give up our guns.... OH HELL NO Who do you think benefits from a defenseless society? When was the last time the cops guarded you and your home or you and your car from attack? How many officers would it take in your town alone to personally guard and ensure the safety and lives of every single civilian citizen? Are you naive enough to believe that the literally millions of criminals in this country alone are going to suddenly "see the light", find Jesus and dedicate their lives to good works just because the UN says they should and Hilary Traitor Clinton signs a small arms treaty and the government then says you must turn in your guns because it's the law? If you believe for one second that defenselessness equals safety and freedom, go back to sleep you are already successfully shackled and are no longer in possession of your own destiny.

Teri



DEPORT HER TO AMERICA !
The Rambo Granny of Melbourne , Australia

 
Gun-toting granny Ava Estelle, 81, was so ticked-off when
two thugs raped her 18-year-old granddaughter that she tracked the
unsuspecting ex-cons down... And shot off their testicles.

 
"The old lady spent a week hunting those men down and, when she found them,
she took revenge on them in her own special
way,"  said Melbourne police investigator Evan Delp.

 
Then she took a taxi to the nearest police station,  laid the
gun on the sergeant 's desk and told him as calm as could be:
"Those bastards will never rape anybody again, by God."

 
Cops say convicted rapist and robber Davis Furth, 33, lost
both his penis and his testicles  when outraged Ava
opened fire with a 9-mm pistol in the hotel room where he and former
prison cell mate Stanley Thomas, 29, were holed up.

 
The wrinkled avenger also blew Thomas ' testicles to kingdom
come,  but doctors managed to save his
mangled penis, police said. "The one
guy, Thomas, didn 't lose his manhood, but the doctor I talked to said
he won 't be using it the way he used to," Detective Delp told
reporters. "Both men are still in pretty bad shape, but I think
they 're just happy to be alive after what they 've been through."

 
The Rambo Granny swung into action August 21 after her
granddaughter Debbie was carjacked and raped in broad daylight by two
knife-wielding creeps in a section of town bordering on skid row.

"When I saw the look on my Debbie 's face that night in
the hospital,  I decided I was
going to go out and get those bastards myself 'cause I figured the Law
would go easy on them," ' recalled the retired library worker.
" And I wasn 't scared of them, either - because I 've got
me a gun and I 've been shootin ' all my life.  And I
wasn 't dumb enough to turn it in when the law changed about owning
one."

 
So, using a police artist 's sketch of the suspects and
Debbie 's description of the sickos, tough-as-nails Ava spent seven days
prowling the wino-infested neighborhood where the crime took place  till she
spotted the ill-fated rapists entering their flophouse hotel.

 
"I knew it was them the minute I saw 'em, but I shot a
picture of 'em anyway and took it back to Debbie and she said sure as
hell, it was them," the oldster recalled...

 
"So I went back to that hotel and found their room and
knocked on the door,  and the minute the
big one opened the door, I shot 'em right square between the legs,
right where it would really hurt 'em most, you know. Then I went in and
shot the other one as he backed up pleading to me to spare him.
Then I went down to the police station and turned myself in."

 
Now, baffled lawmen are trying to figure out exactly how to
deal with the vigilante granny. "What she did was wrong, and she
broke the law, but it is difficult to throw an 81-year-old woman in
prison," Det. Delp said, "especially when 3 million people in
the city want to nominate her for Mayor."

 
DEPORT HER TO AMERICA - WE NEED HER!
********************************************************************************
 
Australian Gun Law Update

 
Here 's a thought to warm some of your hearts....
From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia

 
Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real
figures from Down Under.

 
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to
surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by  our own
government, a program costing Australia   taxpayers
more than $500 million dollars.

 
The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44
percent)!

 
In the state of Victoria
alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.  (Note that
while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not
and criminals still possess their guns!)

 
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady
decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically
upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed
that their prey is unarmed.

 
There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and
assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.

 
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public
safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was
expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns.... ' You
won 't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or
members of the State Assembly disseminating this information.

 
The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the
hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control
laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.

 
Take note Americans, before it 's too late!
Will you be one of the sheep to turn yours in?
WHY? You will need it.

 
FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL LIST.
DON 'T BE A MEMBER OF THE SILENT MAJORITY.
BE ONE OF THE VOCAL MINORITY WHO WON 'T STAND FOR NONSENSE



Reagan & Wanta Videos --- Good Viewing

Merci Beaucoup - Finis
To Bankrupt Our Great Nation _ America, is Totally Insane....

                                  " In God We Trust "

This statement will be on every email that I send out from now on,
because I do not want Our Individual Right to say it to go away ....
forever and a day.

AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
Marvelous Investments Limited  

PLEASE REVIEW :

http://www.youtube.com/embed/OvN1jTkzXbY?rel=0

http://www.nwo3.com/index.php/19-the-27-5-trillion-man?showall=&limitstart=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE


                                                                                                             

VIEWZONE ABOUT AMELIA EARHART, JOSEPH MC MONEAGLE'S REMOTE VIEWING OF HER CRASH SITE IN 1998, COURTNEY BROWN'S 2008/2013


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

VIEWZONE ABOUT AMELIA EARHART, JOSEPH MC MONEAGLE'S REMOTE VIEWING OF HER CRASH SITE IN 1998, COURTNEY BROWN'S 2008/2013
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 5-Sep-2012 12:18:28

world wide event RV experiment, Ed Dames revealing military RV predictions of event prior to solar or meteoric impact, february 2013 passage of asteroid 2012 DA14 27.000 km (16.700 miles) from Earth, and McMoneagle made no comment when asked about 12.21.2012.
More:
Amelia Earhart's Wreckage Found! Why is that BAD news?
http://www.viewzone.com/remoteearhart.html
---
THE EDGE AM: CAROLYN HAMLETT, THE ILLUMINIST BLOODLINE WHISTLEBLOWER INTERVIEW ABOUT "THE PLAN" AND NEXT 7 YEARS
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=251411
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com 

Fact Check: First Lady’s False Fairy Tale of Struggle


Fact Check: First Lady’s False Fairy Tale of Struggle


First Lady Michelle Obama’s pitch to voters last night relied on the premise that she and her husband understand what it is to struggle to make ends meet. She spoke movingly about their early years–about how a young Barack Obama drove a car that was “rusted out” and found his furniture “in a dumpster,” how they both came from families that had to “scrape by.” Her fairy tale–however well-delivered–was one great, big, colorful lie.

Both Michelle Robinson and Barack Obama began their adult lives with a leg up on the rest of America. They attended elite schools: Michelle went to Whitney Young, the public magnet school for Chicago’s upper class, while Barack attended Punahou, the private prep school for the top stratum of Hawaiian society. They were accepted to Ivy League schools despite undistinguished credentials, and both attended Harvard Law School.

“[B]elieve it or not, when we were first married, our combined monthly student loan bills were actually higher than our mortgage,” Michelle said. That sounds like a raw deal–but in fact reflects their fortunate circumstances. They had both just graduated from a very expensive law school, and their combined income from cushy law firm jobs dwarfed the repayments. Barack also soon enjoyed a second salary from the University of Chicago.

They had expensive tastes, reflected in the $277,500 two-bedroom condo they bought in 1993–a high price even by today’s standards. Several years later, they moved into their $1.65 million mansion in Hyde Park–with the help of fraudster Tony Rezko. Barack often told a story of hardship on the campaign trail in 2008 about having his credit card declined–once. The fact that he thought this counted as real hardship speaks volumes.

Dinar Intel --- Footforward

9-5-2012  Intel Guru Footforward    Info is all over the place, misinformation, things are just crazy, even coming out of Iraq.  Biden went to Iraq, not even for a full day...he was not wanted there & turned around and came back.  

There are some people there from the U. S., they have not delayed things.  They are expecting something to happen very quickly.  Good news on the Iraq front.  Audits were done in the banks, they closed the banks at the last minute to make sure coins and lower denoms are not missing, they are keeping tight tabs on exactly what they have.  That's why they had this bank holiday in Iraq. 

The information coming out of the banks on the American side of the pond is very, very, very optimistic, at a level I have never seen before.  They're definitely looking for something to happen right away.  I still expect the rate to be good, I expect it to be in the double digits.  As far as a date, I expect something right away, as early as this week.  Everything that needs to be in motion is in motion.  I can't find any source that tells me this will be delayed.

Parasites Inside You


This clip almost plays like a comedy  
piece but it is an advertisement.

Without endorsing or rejecting the  
herbal treatment being advertised,  
I'd say the information is largely  
true, even if the presentation is  
completely hysterical.

 
Video:

P.S. Please share Forbidden Knowledge TV e-mails
and videos with your friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

Alexandra Bruce
Publisher, Forbidden Knowledge TV 
Daily Videos from the Edges of Science
Miss a broadcast? All FKTV broadcasts are backed up
on
Facebook and Twitter

Have you ever heard that cannabis can be used to treat illness?

A very important video.

Have you ever heard that
cannabis can be used to
treat illness?

It's true, but the story is much
bigger than that.

Forget the California-style
"pot clubs" where misguided
people are told that smoking
the plant will help them.

There's a much simpler
solution - and the "drug
warriors" are insuring
the needless suffering
and premature death
of tens of millions of
people by making sure
you never find out what
it is.

Share this one please.

Video:

http://www.therealfoodchannel.com/page/12019.html

Scathing New RNC Ad: Obama Campaign Stuck in 2008


Look at the Video!!
A Chicken in every Pot, a Car in every Garage...Same thing was said in the 1930's during the last Depression... this is a depression.  The Economic Dept. of the University of Indiana shows the real unemployment at 28%

Subject: Scathing New RNC Ad: Obama Campaign Stuck in 2008

 Scathing New RNC Ad: Obama Campaign Stuck in 2008

The Republican National Committee released a new web ad this past weekend, just on the eve of what is meant to be a triumphal display on the part of the governing Democrats at their convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. And as if the RNC wanted to earn a gold star in dramatic irony, the ad actually makes the case that the Democrats – whose very campaign slogan is “Forward” – are actually stuck in the past.
The ad goes for the jugular, using clips of President Obama speaking from the stump in 2008, while also showing a split screen version of the president in the present day. As the 2008-era Obama proceeds through a speech, the 2012 Obama appears to give the exact mirror image of that speech, with a few word substitutions, almost as if nothing about the Democrats’ message circa 2008 has been altered, in spite of changing circumstances. After the speech is over, the RNC ad wryly concludes, “We’ve heard it all before.”

Guard engineers help preserve town, southern Colo. mining history


...here’s the National Guard press release on the thing: ...'
 
Guard engineers help preserve town, southern Colo. mining history
By Air National Guard Master Sgt. Cheresa D. Theiral, Colorado National Guard Public Affairs
 
Roller 
 
Spc. Luis Garcia guides Spc. Nathan Costman as he operates a roller to compact a roadway in Cokedale, Colo., Aug. 11, 2012. The 947th Engineer Company (Horizontal), Colorado Army National Guard, is installing culverts, cleaning ditches and repairing degraded dirt roads in the small town in southern Colorado. These repairs, in turn, will update and improve the town's infrastructure by directing storm water runoff away from building foundations, and improve the overall quality of life in the tiny town. (Official Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt. Cheresa D. Theiral/Released) Click here or on the photo to download a high-resolution file. More photos of this project are available on Flickr.
Between suppressing flames and assisting law enforcement in the wake of deadly wildfires, Colorado National Guardsmen have had one of the busiest summers on record.
Lesser known, however, is the National Guard's ability to prevent disaster.
To that end, the 947th Engineer Company (Horizontal), of the Colorado Army National Guard has been hard at work helping improve the quality of life in the tiny town of Cokedale, Colo., since Aug. 4.
The 35 Soldiers of the company's 2nd Platoon are installing culverts, cleaning ditches and repairing degraded dirt roads. These repairs, in turn, will update and improve the town's infrastructure by directing storm water runoff away from building foundations.
Yet refurbishing streets and drainage systems means more to the people here than just improving their standard of living.
Cokedale is also a National Historic District -- the only intact coal mining town in Colorado and one of a few remaining in the country -- so the Soldiers' work is also helping preserve history, said Kathy Kumm, Cokedale town clerk.
According to Kumm, Cokedale was once considered a model, company-owned mining camp, because each home had indoor running water one light bulb in every room, which was quite rare in 1907.
Mining ceased 40 years later, but the structures remained. The mining company eventually sold all the houses for $50 a room and $100 a lot, and Cokedale became an incorporated township in 1947.
"Today, many of the original structures are still standing, providing a good example of how folks used to live and of the coal mining heritage, which is paramount in southern Colorado," said Kumm. "We're very excited the Soldiers are here. We're going to have far more of this project done that we could have ever have done without them."
Cokedale resident Jeanne Lane notes the town is roughly 160 acres -- two square miles -- and with a population of approximately 120 -- including many living on a fixed income -- the town can't afford to make the necessary infrastructure repairs.
"It's important to get the ditches leaned out or the water would be in my basement," she said.
This civil-military project is part of the National Guard’s Innovative Readiness Training program. Civil-military IRT projects enhance unit training and readiness, while filling a community need that is not otherwise being met. The unit must maintain its readiness by performing realistic training, and IRT projects provide a meaningful outlet for that training and help connect National Guard units with the communities they serve.
"For a horizontal engineering company, we couldn't have asked for a better project," said 2nd Lt. Tim Barkley, 2nd Platoon leader, who noted that the unit is using all its equipment and is also tracking the Soldiers' mileage and hours."It means a lot to me that our Soldiers are getting great training and giving back to the community at the same time."
On behalf of his unit, Barkley also expressed his gratitude to the townspeople, who he describes as open, welcoming and generous -- to the extent that they’ve provided homemade meals and pastries, and left coolers full of cold drinks outside for the engineers.
"It's a mutual admiration society between the townspeople and the Soldiers," said Mayor Sandy McGonigal. "It's nice that we can allow them to do this real world and we're thrilled we're able to get this project done."
Past Colorado Army National Guard IRT projects include tamarisk removal in Grand Junction, Colo., building a retention pond in Deer Trail, Colo., work on a dam and reservoir No. 1 in Fruita, Colo., and a boulder removal and hauling mission north of Durango, Colo.
Engineers also worked to finish the Archuleta County Fairground in Pagosa Springs, Colo., earlier in 2012.
Starting Aug. 17, the 1st and 3rd Platoons of the 947th Engineers are scheduled to begin work on a storm water retention dam that will span Leach Creek in Grand Junction, Colo.
8/14/2012