A little bit of history...
Since this article mentions runaway slaves, I'll
tell my story of moving to live in an old 12 room farmhouse in
northern Illinois after my mother remarried. I was playing in the
back yard with the dog when I happened to glance up, and in the second story I
saw a window that "didn't belong to anyone" as far as a bedroom,
bathroom, or closet for a family member. I asked my stepdad about it
and he said that the room had been used as a hideout for runaway slaves before
and during the Civil War. The slaves were moved at night by way of
the "underground railroad" to Wisconsin, and finally Canada. I
searched throughout the house looking for a secret passage and opening to
the room in all the closets, bedrooms, nooks and crannies but never found one.
I regret to this day that I never got a super
tall ladder to peek in the window of the secret room that hid runaway
slaves and that I never questioned my stepdad about more
informatin. pfk
We The People Blocking The Corrupted Federal Government!
In 1850, when President
Millard Fillmore signed the second
“Fugitive Slave Act,” due process was under serious attack by the
federal government.
The law compelled people of all states to “assist” federal marshals and their deputies with the apprehension of suspected runaway slaves. It brought all trials involving alleged fugitive slaves under federal jurisdiction. It included large fines for anyone who aided a slave in their escape, even by simply giving them food or shelter.
On top of it, bounties were paid to commissioners in fugitive slave cases. $10 was paid if a person was sent back to slavery, and $5 if the person was allowed freedom. The federal government was paying people to capture other people and send them to slavery.
The act also suspended habeas corpus and the right to a trial by jury for alleged “slaves,” and made their testimony inadmissible in court. The written testimony of the supposed slave master, on the other hand, which could be presented to the court by slave hunters, was given preferential treatment.
STATE RESISTANCE
In response, Northern States intensified efforts to pass what were known as “personal liberty laws.” These had already been growing over time in response to the original Fugitive Slave Act years earlier.
Vermont passed a “Habeas Corpus Law,” requiring state judicial and law enforcement officials to actually help captured fugitive slaves there. Massachusetts took a really strong stand – and passed a law that provided for kidnapping charges to anyone trying to use these “indefinite detention” provisions of the fugitive slave act.
No federal agent was charged with kidnapping in Massachusetts, though. But, this was only because no escapee was ever captured for return after the law was passed. The state response was working.
In fact, Northern states were so successful overall that when South Carolina seceded ten years later the people there named this as one of their primary reasons for leaving the Union. From their publicly-released “Declaration of Causes,” was this:
“The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the [Fugitive Slave Acts] or render useless any attempt to execute them…”
The law compelled people of all states to “assist” federal marshals and their deputies with the apprehension of suspected runaway slaves. It brought all trials involving alleged fugitive slaves under federal jurisdiction. It included large fines for anyone who aided a slave in their escape, even by simply giving them food or shelter.
On top of it, bounties were paid to commissioners in fugitive slave cases. $10 was paid if a person was sent back to slavery, and $5 if the person was allowed freedom. The federal government was paying people to capture other people and send them to slavery.
The act also suspended habeas corpus and the right to a trial by jury for alleged “slaves,” and made their testimony inadmissible in court. The written testimony of the supposed slave master, on the other hand, which could be presented to the court by slave hunters, was given preferential treatment.
STATE RESISTANCE
In response, Northern States intensified efforts to pass what were known as “personal liberty laws.” These had already been growing over time in response to the original Fugitive Slave Act years earlier.
Vermont passed a “Habeas Corpus Law,” requiring state judicial and law enforcement officials to actually help captured fugitive slaves there. Massachusetts took a really strong stand – and passed a law that provided for kidnapping charges to anyone trying to use these “indefinite detention” provisions of the fugitive slave act.
No federal agent was charged with kidnapping in Massachusetts, though. But, this was only because no escapee was ever captured for return after the law was passed. The state response was working.
In fact, Northern states were so successful overall that when South Carolina seceded ten years later the people there named this as one of their primary reasons for leaving the Union. From their publicly-released “Declaration of Causes,” was this:
“The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the [Fugitive Slave Acts] or render useless any attempt to execute them…”
- US
Supreme Court: Citizens must be permitted to use handguns for
self-defense: Treaties Do Not Supercede The Second Amendment!
- Banker’s
Establishment Mongering Fear In The Land Of The Brave!
- We
The People The 99% Vs Rothschild’s 1% Wall Street International Banks!
- Weekend
Reflections: Sovereign States To feds: Stay in D.C.!
- The
Goldwater Institute Suing Obama’s Agenda 21 Scheme: Blocking Water To
Tombstone, Arizona USA!
- Only
Ron Paul Is Addressing The 10 Important Issues To Protect The United
States Constitution From The Rothschild Banking Cabal!
- Oregon
Sheriff Gil Gilbertson Continues Stand Against Federal Government!
- 30
Facts Rothschild Planned The Gulf Oil Crisis ~ Cannot Trust The Corporate
System So I Threw It On The Ground.
NDAA: THE ROAD
BACKWARDS
In 1942, FDR signed an executive order which authorized the creation of military zones “from which any or all persons may be excluded.”
This led to the roundup of around 110,000 Japanese-Americans and Japanese citizens living here in California and along the West Coast. Without due process to assist them, these people were relocated and sent to internment camps. Many more were classified as “enemy aliens” and subjected to increased restrictions.
Like the Fugitive Slave Acts and Japanese mass internment, the federal government has again taken new powers never intended under the Constitution. Under sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA, the feds again claim the power to classify people in such a way that they no longer have rights.
President Obama and Congress have dropped the terms “fugitive slave” and “enemy alien.” Instead, they use “suspected terrorist” as a way to eliminate due process these days.
In 1942, FDR signed an executive order which authorized the creation of military zones “from which any or all persons may be excluded.”
This led to the roundup of around 110,000 Japanese-Americans and Japanese citizens living here in California and along the West Coast. Without due process to assist them, these people were relocated and sent to internment camps. Many more were classified as “enemy aliens” and subjected to increased restrictions.
Like the Fugitive Slave Acts and Japanese mass internment, the federal government has again taken new powers never intended under the Constitution. Under sections 1021 and 1022 of the NDAA, the feds again claim the power to classify people in such a way that they no longer have rights.
President Obama and Congress have dropped the terms “fugitive slave” and “enemy alien.” Instead, they use “suspected terrorist” as a way to eliminate due process these days.
RESISTANCE TODAY
Today, in the spirit of the 19th century Personal Liberty Laws, states and local communities around the country are taking action against NDAA detention powers. Virginia recently became the first state in the country to pass a law refusing compliance with or assistance to federal agents carrying out detentions without due process against citizens of that state. Arizona’s legislature just passed a similar bill. And a number of other states are working on the same.
But, it’s not just states. More than ten local communities are on board too. For example, up north in Fairfax, CA, they passed legislation which says that they will:
“Instruct all our Town of Fairfax agencies to decline requests by federal agencies acting under detention powers granted by the NDAA that could infringe upon residents’ freedom of speech, religion, assembly, privacy, or rights to counsel.”
Today, in the spirit of the 19th century Personal Liberty Laws, states and local communities around the country are taking action against NDAA detention powers. Virginia recently became the first state in the country to pass a law refusing compliance with or assistance to federal agents carrying out detentions without due process against citizens of that state. Arizona’s legislature just passed a similar bill. And a number of other states are working on the same.
But, it’s not just states. More than ten local communities are on board too. For example, up north in Fairfax, CA, they passed legislation which says that they will:
“Instruct all our Town of Fairfax agencies to decline requests by federal agencies acting under detention powers granted by the NDAA that could infringe upon residents’ freedom of speech, religion, assembly, privacy, or rights to counsel.”
Become a member and support the TAC!
JUST THE BEGINNING
When Northern States protected habeas corpus against federal encroachments in the 19th century, they were doing their duty to protect liberty and the Constitution. Today, states and local communities are doing the same.
They can and should serve as a powerful check on federal power. In fact, the framers counted on it. It’s all about local actions. As Democrats and Republicans continue to work together in DC to take away our rights, it’s our local communities who must and will rise up to save them.
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.
When Northern States protected habeas corpus against federal encroachments in the 19th century, they were doing their duty to protect liberty and the Constitution. Today, states and local communities are doing the same.
They can and should serve as a powerful check on federal power. In fact, the framers counted on it. It’s all about local actions. As Democrats and Republicans continue to work together in DC to take away our rights, it’s our local communities who must and will rise up to save them.
Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin, on LinkedIn, and on Facebook.
If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,
Related articles
- Virginia Has Outlawed Deadbeat Senator McCain’s NDAA ~ The
Nazi ‘Indefinite Detention Rule’ (politicalvelcraft.org)
- Virginia will not cooperate with NDAA detention
(destructionist.wordpress.com)
- State Of Vermont To Obama Feds: BACK OFF ~ The Federal
Courts Have No Jurisdiction To Overrule The PEOPLE! (usapartisan.com)
- State Of Vermont To Obama Feds: BACK OFF ~ The Federal
Courts Have No Jurisdiction To Overrule The PEOPLE!
(politicalvelcraft.org)
- Should We Obey All Laws? by Walter E. Williams
(gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- A Historical Example That Might Grind the NDAA to a Halt.
(thelonestarwatchdog.com)
- Progress in Michigan Against NDAA Detention Powers
(tenthamendmentcenter.com)
- Don’t go down shooting. Nullify!
(tenthamendmentcenter.com)
- Judicial Juggling: NDAA vs. Fundamental Rights
(tenthamendmentcenter.com)
- A
War of Emancipation (jacobinmag.com)
