21 December A.D. 2012
What follows is an updated version:
"hollywood" is deliberately not
capitalized.
We can think of that as an economic
statement in the very same way that "irs" is not capitalized in my
writings, and for the very same economic statement/reasons.
by Harmon Taylor
Lots of information from lots of
sources on some of these (alleged) mass shootings.
There's no question that the agenda in
Washington is to disarm America.
This author has accepted as true the
"motive" for Aurora, and now Sandy Hook, as being retaliatory
strikes against family members of those testifying about and exposing the
Libor interest-rate-fixing criminal conspiracy affecting banking activity the
world over.
[ Update comment: Libor, sometimes
LIBOR, means London Interbank Offered Rate.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/libor.asp.
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIBOR;
http://www.bankrate.com/rates/interest-rates/libor.aspx;
and http://www.economist.com/node/21558281.
A generic internet search for "libor scandal" should
produce a number of discussions on this matter. ]
This author has accepted as true that
those involved at the very top with such plots are deranged occultists who
just can't get enough kiddie-porn or child sacrifice.
Toward that end, this author has (all
too?) readily accepted as true that when the news pundits tell us there's
been a shooting, it actually happened. Surely they have access to the
information that would satisfy us, if we were there, that such actually occurred.
That said, there is a perspective associated
with the shooting in Aurora (Batman, movie theatre) and now also with the
Sandy Hook elementary school shooting that the events are very well staged
and acted. This note exists to make known that such perspective exists and
persists and to explore whether there's any logical, practical reason why one
should entertain such perspective, at all.
Initially, the perspective that such media
sensations as the (alleged) mass shooting at the movie theatre in Aurora,
Colorado and now of the (alleged) mass shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary
School could in any way be "staged," fabricated, hoaxes at the
extreme level, seems so outrageously impossible as to be dismissed
immediately. How could there possibly be "so many people involved"
in such a scam as a mass shooting and there not be a leak somewhere? This is
one of the great arguments associated with the "truth or fiction"
analysis of the (alleged) moon landings. If it's not true, how could there be
so many people involved in that particular lie and it not leak out?
What about the JFK and RFK assassinations? For
the JFK assassination plot to work, the driver, allegedly a member of the
Secret Service, would have to slow the car down in the kill zone for all the
shooters to make successful shots. The car did stay at that kill zone speed
all the way through the kill zone, and still there were all kinds of missed
shots.
Regarding RFK, the shot that killed RFK was to
the back of his head, behind his ear, which means that the Secret Service had
to be involved in that murder, as well. No one else was behind him in the
hotel's kitchen.
But, where even part of the Secret Service are
involved in those murders, as is also the case for the attempted murder of
Reagan, who told the world that he didn't feel anything until after he was in
the car, under the (alleged) Secret Service agent, at which particular
instant/moment, it felt like he had a broken rib, we still deal with the
reality that such facts are so obvious and yet so "not talked
about" that the lies we've been fed stand relatively unchallenged in
popular "thinking" and "coverage" on those matters. There
are any number of people involved, including the "commissions" set
up "to investigate," and all the staff people for those
"commissions," in those still persistent cover-up activities.
"We" know what has to be the case. "We" know what the
facts are. But "the government" holds to their original lies.
(Remember this perspective as all the voter fraud and election fraud stories
continue to circulate. The puppetmasters who pick and choose the key public
officials well before any elections take place just can't take any chances of
letting non-complying members into those critical public offices. There are
just too many skeletons in those closets.)
[ Update comment: This author has received word from an informed source that
the Secret Service didn't protect presidential candidates at the time of
RFK's assassination. Thus, this author has misapplied the "credit"
for failure of protection, thus of murder, of RFK to the Secret Service. (No
apologies offered, though, given their participation in other murders and
cover ups.) The credit for the murder of RFK actually belongs to the CIA and
to the LAPD.]
Further, as is the setting with "The Sting," "Hogan's
Heroes," "Ocean's 11," "Ocean's 12," and
"Ocean's 13," "Burn Notice," the relatively recent tv
series, "Leverage," and no doubt several other such stories,
there's a whole team of people involved in the set-up. But, that's hollywood.
What about a scam, a
"made-for-tv-movie" setting, a hoax so huge that it also involves
the doctors, nurses, and medical staff allegedly treating shooting victims?
That's a lot of seemingly independent, unrelated people to have all acting
from the same script.
If such events are world-class hoaxes,
scams, fictions, from where would the participants come? What could possibly
keep the whole team from spilling the beans? How could that entire scenario
possibly be controlled enough to pull off a scam of such huge proportions?
Think "French underground,"
and we'll headed toward one possible, very real, very practical explanation
of that part of the puzzle. Of course, at least a number of participants in
the French underground were caught and executed. So, it's not the best
analogy, but the point is that there's no problem coming up with a (very
large) group of people who would want to perpetuate such outrageous, sick,
sadistic scams against and on the American people. McCarthy would know
exactly where to start. Anyone who has seen "Obama's America:
2016," http://2016themovie.com/,
knows that obama is a communist at heart. To understand why FDR did what he
did starts with understanding that FDR was a communist at heart.
Always keep in mind that when God
raises up a "Beast" system, He doesn't mess around. There's the
"funny money" angle, which is at the heart of the present
"Beast" system, and which "life blood" of the European
banking cartels system may start an unstoppable, Heparin-overdose-appearing
hemorrhage come January 1, 2013. If it turns out to be the case that
"treasury bills," i.e., "US notes," start to circulate,
then the grave marker for the "federal reserve system" and it's
"at interest" "funny money" system has already been
ordered and delivered; it awaits only the day of its positioning over the
grave of the "federal reserve system."
In addition to the "funny
money" angle, by which the "choice of law" is controlled,
there's also the "communist" angle. What influence could possibly
want to see God removed from the schools? From sporting events? From public
gatherings? The "fingerprint" of God-hating, America-hating
"communism" is all over these events and developments within the
legal policy in place at present in America. What influence could possibly
want to disarm America? The same influence that has promoted disarmament in
several nations in history. This author labels it as Nazi-communo-fascist.
There are emails circulating about who has, in history, approved of the
insanity of disarming the people, and they are a who's who list of communists
and fascists.
When God raises up a "Beast" system against His rebellious
people, He doesn't mess around.
So, to the application thought of focus, we get to this question ....
Are there enough
"communists" (Nazi-communo-fascists) in the nation or possible to
recruit from places outside of this nation to form/create/establish/maintain
a "communist underground" from which pool of minds/people could be
drawn enough people to run the scams on the Cecil-B-DeMille-sized scale we're
talking about, here? Sure. Of course there are.
Let's take this study one more step
down that path. It happens that Connecticut is one of the most
communist-leaning STATEs in the nation at present (to the horrific shock and
amazement of those who have ancestry that dates all the way back to the
founding of this nation). Anyone still happen to remember Kelo v. City of New
London, where the "government" "took" land from a family,
who had owned that land for something like 100 years at that point, under the
theory of "eminent domain?" New London is a community in
Connecticut.
What is the geographic origin of the
Heller case, in which the ordinance existed that intended to render self-defense
of and in one's own domicile illegal? Washington, DC.
What is the geographic origin of the
"chemical weapons ban treaty"-based homicide charge against a woman
named BOND? Pennsylvania (a long-time "blue" (democratic party
supporting) state). (As has been said before, and as is said here, again, and
as will likely be said again in the future, that case, while marketed as a
10th Amendment case, is a Structural Due Process case -- who is going to
define the crimes for any STATE: that STATE's legislature or a group of
international parties who sign some treaty or other?
Could cooperating
(Nazi-communo-fascist) nations, by simply agreeing to something, overrule a
STATE's legislative authority and take over a STATE's, or all STATEs',
authority to define and punish crime? The Supreme Court is holding off the
enormous push for the latter, but we could sure provide them some support by
no longer contributing to that Nazi-communo-fascist agenda -- how is that
accomplished? by reducing down to zero the number of transactions for which
we use "funny money.")
This STATE-oriented political leanings
analogy can't be taken too far, in that while there was a suspicious shooting
in Arizona, a predominately conservative leaning STATE, Colorado is, during
the four previous elections, mixed in its voting record as kept for national
election statistics. (Colorado is the "home state" for both the
Columbine shooting, regarding which we were fed nothing but lies, and for the
recent Aurora shooting, an event of focus in this note.) Not that this author
believes for one instant that these statistics of voting in any way, shape,
manner, or form reflect any vote for which any "electronic voting
machine" was used in the voting process, the movers and shakers can't go
too far overboard in misrepresenting the thinking of the people in this
nation. So, it's an interesting parallel between these communist-leaning
political efforts, including disarmament, and the alleged political-leaning
of the majority vote in that STATE/community.
With all that in mind, the question
that has caught this author's attention in both of those recent events,
Aurora and Sandy Hook, is a simple one: Where are the bodies?
We're told a number, and sometimes
we're given names. We're told how some of them died, i.e., where they were
injured and by what cause/force. That tends to suggest that there were, in
fact, cadavers produced by the events. There may have been some cadavers
produced, but is there a cadaver for each number and name reported?
Thus, that question, "Where are
the bodies?" is one that has to be addressed. It has an all-too-familiar
ring to it, in that there were "no bodies" at the alleged crash
site of Flight 93 (S-11, Shanksville, Pennsylvania).
Regarding S-11, there certainly seemed
to be people jumping out of the Twin Towers. That shows up on videos. We know
that any form of information transfer may be fabricated, so surely there's
evidence of where those people hit the ground. (This author hasn't looked for
such, so this author presumes that such exists.)
This author has concluded that there
really were people who died in that part of the S-11 events. But, there were
"no bodies" at/near Shanksville. How do we know? The coroner for
that community told us that information that very morning, and this author
accepts that person as a credible witness. That plus the fact that the video
coverage, presumed to be unfabricated, also shows "no bodies."
As a direct follow-on to the reality
that there were "no bodies" associated with the alleged crash site
of (alleged) Flight 93, there still persists the concept, for which, if
memory serves, a "movie" was made, that some passengers rushed the
alleged box-cutter-wielding hijackers thus causing, or contributing to the
cause of, the crash of Flight 93. This author fully remembers seeing on
network tv broadcasts the video (picture) feed, "live," of a
"family gathering" at the broadcast studio of those family members
of those who had allegedly rushed the box-cutter-wielding hijackers and died
so heroically in that crash.
Where there were no passengers, and no
crash, and, no plane, at all, associated with Shanksville, thus also no
hijackers, from where, then, came those folks who were presented to America,
live, allegedly from the broadcast studio, as surviving family members of
those hijacker-rushing people?
This author saw that "group
gathering" photo-op that one time, i.e., not before and not since. One
person's exposure to, experience with, that particular angle on the matter
may not mean anything. This author "knew" they had to be actors IF
the rest of the evidence, including, in particular, "no bodies," is
true and reliable. As it stands, this author accepts as true that there were
"no bodies," thus no hijackers and no plane (crash), in the alleged
"crash" scene at Shanksville marketed to the world as part of the
S-11 events. Therefore, this author accepts as true that the tv network(s)
either did the staging or were dupes for the staging of that story.
If there were surviving family
members, then of course, there were deaths from the crash of Flight 93. But,
there were "no bodies."
Hence, there was no crash; there were
no passengers; there were no box-cutter-wielding hijackers; in short,
"everything" we've been told via the "official" sources
about Flight 93 is a pure fabrication. Everything, including the allegation
of surviving family members. Therefore, those people posing as surviving
family members were actors/actresses.
It happens that theatres may be rented
out for "special events." This author hasn't heard any evidence
either way that such was the case in Aurora, Colorado. Opening event for the
movie -- not likely that the theatre was reserved by any particular group.
But, nothing prevents a group of people from standing in line (together) and
sitting in a particular spot in the theatre in order to pull off that hoax,
if it is, in fact, a hoax. The weapons allegedly planted inside the theatre
could easily have been taken in and planted by a team member, whether someone
conveniently in the theatre's employ or a movie-goer.
This author is not yet up to
concluding that Aurora was a hoax. He is, however, keeping in mind the
reality that it's fully possible for the news to report "bodies"
and "deaths" that just flat never happened. There are still too
many more angles necessary to "cover," including the medical staff
allegedly treating wounds, before this author will be in a position to
conclude that there was, in fact, no bullets, no blood, and no bodies. But,
since the question has been asked, "Where are the bodies?" there
needs to be some confirmation of such. (When the answer comes back, Yes, of
course there are/were bodies, without something akin to what is provided for
us via "Best Evidence" regarding the JFK assassination in the way
of photographs of the cadaver, how far into the background of that witness do
we check in order to satisfy ourselves of that witness's credibility?) It's
an extremely basic legal point: what constitutes credible evidence? That's
always a "jury question."
Update comment:
This author has been reminded of the
drowning death of one of the nurses involved in handling the Aurora shooting
victims' injuries. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/20/jennifer-gallagher-aurora-nurse-dies-iowa_n_1813256.html;
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57496277/nurse-who-treated-aurora-victims-drowns-in-iowa/.
There may be more to that, and there
may be nothing to that. An investigation for another time.]
As the question of "Where are the
bodies?" has also been raised regarding Sandy Point, it's very tough to
know how to answer it. Which is the scam/hoax side of the matter -- the
controlled media, clearly a pravda outlet for the Nazi-communo-fascist agenda
that prevails in DC, or those who raise that question without much more to it
than having raised the question? There is a comment that the caskets are
closed and that the parents are not "being allowed" to see the
bodies of their children.
If the entire community is filled with
actors/actresses participating in a horrific hoax, what would be expect to
hear from them? They would have to remain in character. Thus, what
third-party source could provide information that would resolve the matter
either way? And, where all the DNA and blood and dental "evidence"
comes back in support of the media's story, how far into that line of
information must one dig to verify that the correct initial information is
what's being used, i.e., that the base-line information hasn't been tampered
with?
[Update comment: In response to this
part of this discussion, a reader in the general locale of the Sandy Point
crime scene, who has high credibility as an analyst of such matters, is
satisfied that the information provided via the news reporting locally, in
Connecticut, confirms that there really were cadavers produced as a result of
that shooting. Thus, at least for the Sandy Point crime scene, the question
of, "Where are the bodies?" has been addressed by the showing of
such in the local news in Connecticut.]
Among all the mystery that shrouds
such matters, one thing is of no mystery. We're dealing with a
"Beast" system. Having just detailed that concept and the origin of
the connection between God's Judgment and just such a system in a three-part
discussion, what will be stated here is the conclusion side of the matter.
Once we see that we're dealing with a
"Beast" system that intends to disarm us, the reality or hoax
nature of those events takes a little less energy out of our day. Whether
there really is an attack against those testifying about and exposing the
Libor scam, and whether there really are mass shootings and horrific deaths
as "control" measures by those intent on keeping a Libor scam on
track and unprosecuted, is secondary to the political agenda of
disarmament that is being furthered by such stories.
Key to disarmament is the concept of
War. War is a Judgment. Where the Nazi-communo-fascist-agenda-supporting
War-mongers intend to try to complete their coup de etat of America, one way
or another, the thing to keep in mind that is no War prosecuted by God can be
stopped, where no War defended by God can progress.
There were "no bodies" in
Shanksville. There may or may not be any actual bodies associated with the
Aurora shooting or the Sandy Hook shooting. But, rest very much assured that
if this nation is provoked into any type of War, domestic in nature, against
this "Beast" system, which exists to devour and destroy the
rebellious, there will most assuredly be bodies.
The simple statistics are these.
There's no nation on the planet more armed than this one. No
Nazi-communo-fascist think tank has overlooked that fact. Those who chip
themselves or their kids will do so voluntarily. Those who get immunizations
will do so voluntarily. Those who disarm themselves will do so voluntarily.
Until there is de facto house-to-house activity forcing disarmament, it's
still all "just talk." If there's one thing that Washington is good
at, it's running a bluff.
We need to try very hard to see the
bluff for what it is. Is Aurora also a bluff? Is Sandy Hook another aspect of
the bluff? There are suicide bombers, and there are shootings that produce
cadavers, but not everything reported as a suicide bombing is a suicide
bombing, and not everything reported as a mass shooting may turn out to be a
mass shooting. Thus, is either of these events real or is either a hoax?
Those right there on the scene "know" which it is, and as for the
rest of us, the sooner we inquire of God, as David did, as to why He's
inundating us with War, Famine, Pestilence (Disease, Plague) and this
"Beast" system, and the sooner we come to terms with and implement,
individually, the changes in thought, thus activity, that God is rather much
compelling us to make, over which we have individual control, at best, hence
the reason for His Judgments in the first place, the sooner the
"power" that feeds this "Beast" system ends.
Not necessarily comfortable to have to
"preach" on, but something that has to be taught and "preached,"
is that events told to us as having Scriptural origins that have nothing to
do with Scripture and that are actually very pagan in origin, e.g., Lent,
Easter, and Christmas, are this author's suggested starting place(s) for the
change of mind, thus of activity, the perpetuation of which pagan activities
has contributed to the existence of God's wrath, hence, His Judgments,
including all of War, Famine, Pestilence (Disease, Plague), and
"Beasts." Of course, this author can't say enough that another
thing that has to change is the use of the European banking cartel's
"funny money." The "kings of the rising sun" ("kings
of the east") (Rev. 16) may already have provided a huge part of the
solution to this problem. We'll know come Jan. 1, 2013, where that
development stands.
There are three "birthday
celebration" events in Scripture. The "third" one
(chronologically, the second one) is the massacre of the innocent under
Herod's command when he realized that those visiting Messiah upon the news of
His birth hadn't returned to Herod to tell him about anything. Thus, child
sacrifice is a very real part of that which is associated with the birth of
Messiah, for those who exist to defy and deny His Messiah-ship.
If there really are bodies, i.e., if
children truly were massacred in Connecticut, at the hand of the
Nazi-communo-fascist-agenda-based "Beast" system, as has been
reported, then it may already make sense that the longer we feed the
"Beast" by defying God, the more of those sorts of events will occur.
When God raises up a "Beast," He doesn't mess around.
By executing His Judgments, He's telling us that He expects change,
i.e., repentance.
Where we have control over something, and we definitely have at least
the responsibility to exercise control over ourselves, He expects us to
exercise that control. To see the Judgments is to have Notice.
To have Notice is to recognize that
the opportunity for change, via repentance, is still being extended to us.
Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=264030
|
