Friday, January 4, 2013

Judge england is de facto saying, if you steal and run away fast, you can get away with theft


Subject: Judge england is de facto saying, if you steal and run away fast, you can get away with theft

Judge England case: Emergency relief of the Temporary restraining order was not granted but the case goes on. Some of the statements by the judge are shocking, he de facto says that if one can steal a property with forged IDs and was not caught because nobody wanted to hear the case on the merits, then he can keep the stolen property scotts free forever!!!

Posted on | January 4, 2013 | No Comments
orly

Rich Pedroncelli / AP

Attorney Orly Taitz, who filed suit to stop the counting of electoral votes, is greeted by supporters Gregory Kofman, center and Alexander Gofen, right, outside the Robert T. Mastui Federal Courthouse in Sacramento, Calif., Thursday, Jan. 3, 2013. U.S. District Court Judge Morrison C. England said the case is unlikely to succeed and rejected Taitz’ petition for a restraining order to halt the counting of electoral votes scheduled for Friday.
We had a hearing yesterday before judge England Chief Judge of the U.S. district Court of the US. Eastern District of California in Sacramento.
I had a problem with my flight, arrived late home after the hearing, did not sleep a night before and decided to wait till the morning to write a full report.
Bottom line, the case goes on, but the emergency relief was not granted.
US attorney conceded that if Obama is sued as a candidate, and not a federal employee, he cannot be represented by the Department of Justice, he cannot be represented by the U.S. attorney’s office.
The arguments given by the defense were outrageous at best. AG of Ca did not say much, most of the argument came from the US attorney.
There was media in the courtroom. Associated press reporter and photographer greeted me at the entrance and took pictures. AP reported that the courtroom was overflowing with people, was packed and most of the people were not Obama supporters. There were probably a total of a 100 people there. After the hearing people were shaking my hand, thanking me for the fight, while a number of people yelled out “mockery” as the judge was leaving the courtroom, indicating that the behavior of the judge was a mockery of justice. As I left the courtroom a large croud gathered and people were applauding me and chanting and thanking for standing up to criminals and corruption.
US attorney stated at the hearing that there is no requirement for the US President to have a valid birth certificate and a valid selective service certificate and a valid Social Security number, that the U.S. Constitution does not state that the president is supposed to have valid papers.
The judge nodded and told me, indeed the U.S. constitution does not require the US President to have valid IDs.
I responded to him that the U.S. Constitution does not require the President to have a pulse also. There is nothing in the U.S. constitution saying that the U.S. President is supposed to have any brain activity, however it is common sense to believe or at least hope that the U.S. President should have a pulse and a brain activity. Similarly the U.S. Constitution does not say that the birth certificate of the President should not be forged, however it is common sense to believe that if the President has to be a natural born citizen, he should have a valid birth certificate and not a computer generated forgery, that he would not be using a stolen Social Security number and a forged selective service certificate.
I stated that I provided him with a sworn affidavit of Jeffrey Stephen Coffman, former chief investigator of the special investigations unit of the US Coast Guard and a former special agent of the Department of the Homeland Security, who attested under penalty of perjury that Obama’s Selective Service certificate is an altered document, a forgery, for this reason alone Obama is not allowed to work in the executive branch, not as a President , not as a janitor in the White house. One is not allowed to work in the executive branch of the U.S. Government if he did not registered with the selective service.
The judge simply ignored this point, he could not care less and could not be bothered with something as unimportant as violation of law.
Then I raised the point of one and a half million invalid voter registrations In California, judge did not respond, could not care less about flagrant fraud in elections in CA.
I told him that my clients are Presidential electors and presidential candidates, he ignored that. I told him that Grinols is the elector for Romney, who came in second. the judge said: what don’t you understand about being second? I said that I do understand, that if one, who came in first, is using forged iDs and not qualified, then one who came in second, will be declared a winner. (I was thinking to myself, what a question, does the judge understand this simple consept?)
I told him that Obama posted his tax returns on line, did not flatten the pdf file, it showed him using a CT SSN, which was not assigned to him according to E-verify, the judge could not be bothered with something as insignificant as a US President using a stolen Social Security number.
He said that other judges dismissed my challenges and one judge sanctioned me.
I reminded him that when Thurgood Marshall fought for the civil rights of African Americans, a number of corrupt judges dismissed his cases time and again until he found one court that was willing to deal with segregation. If Thurgood Marshall would have been intimidated, we would have segregation until today. The judge lowered his head, he was holding his head with his hands, he was clearly following the marching orders from the regime and was deeply ashamed of it. A number of people later told me that they felt that the judge looked like he was ashamed of what he was doing. I reminded the judge that Susan B. Anthony went to court after court and not only was sanctioned, she was tried and imprisoned. She spent time in prison for what was right. If she were to be intimidated and discouraged by one corrupt judge, women in this country would not have any rights up to today. The judge did not say anything, he was silent in regards to that.
I asked to allow me to put on the stand my witnesses: intelligence officer Pamela Barnett and former employee of the National Security Agency, expert in typesetting, typewriting and computer graphics with 57 years of experience Paul Irey, who would testify that the alleged copy of Obama’s birth certificate is a computer generated forgery. The judge refused to allow witnesses to testify. I told the judge that yesterday his deputy wrote an e-mail, which I posted on line on my web site, it was seen by millions of people, where she stated that witnesses will be allowed to testify, I relied on this and brought witnesses. The courtroom is full fobservers, who are anxious to hear witnesses testify. It cost me a thousand dollars to pay for the air fair, hotel, $150 for production of exhibits, the judge said no. I told him that I am a civil rights pro bono attorney, that I made all this effort based on a permission given by him through his deputy only a day earlier, but he said no.
So all I could do, was to take out the exhibits, which were large, the media could see the exhibits thad I showed that the birth certificate was a clear forgery, that one cannot type something with a type writer and get letters of all different sizes and shapes and different fonts, it can be only done by a forger, cutting and pasting letters and words from different documents.
I showed him that it is impossible to have a white hallo around words if you only place a document on the green safety paper. this is possible only with computer manipulation, with an application called unsharp mask. I showed a birth certificate of Susan Nordyke and showed how Obama’s BC was out of sequence and that the name of the registrar is different from the name of the registrar in Nordyke’s BC, which was signed during the same time. The judge did not care.
I provided him information that in Obama’s mother’s passport Obama is listed under the name Soebarkah, that Obama is not his legal name, the judge did not care.
I reminded him that he has affidavits from the law enforcement: Sheriff Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, Investigator Coffman, the judge did not care.
His last iron clad proof, as he took upon himself to act as an attorney for Obama, was that Obama lives in the White house, he is the president and this is the proof.
I told him that the fact that he was elected in 2008, when we did not have all the evidence, does not mean that he should be confirmed now, when we have all the evidence of forgery in his IDs. The judge said: “who lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? President Obama, that means he is the president.”
Chief judge of the Eastern District of California is de facto saying: it is ok to be a thief and a forger, as long as you can forge and steal and not be caught because there isn’t one honest AG or Da or US attorney or a judge to compel production of the original documents and prosecute you for fraud, forgery and theft, then you can continue keeping the stolen property forever…
It seems that during Obama regime the only ones who get protection from the law are the criminals, the law abiding citizens are completely deprived of all of their rights, the only thing they have to protect them, is ammo. Just a year or two ago, during the Arab Spring, when people of the Middle Eastern Countries realised that they have no civil rights in their corrupt regimes, they revolted and threw off their dictators, corrupt judges on the take, corrupt law enforcement on the take with the rest of the regime. Without an honest judiciary I am afraid this will be happenning in this country in the near future.
I will request the atudio tape and the transcript. I would appreciate donations to cover the cost of the transcript, travel and the cost of maitnaining these case and this fight. Previously I was quoted very high fee for the transcript. I am posting the pleadings and the article from the local press, which is skewed.
Please, keep calling, faxing and writing the Supreme Court of the US, demand that Chief Justice John Roberts issue his ruling in Noonan et al v Obama asap
Grinols order, summons, TRO, complaint – Copy
Affidavit Jeffrey Stephen Coffman
No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed:
December 13, 2012
Lower Ct:
Supreme Court of California

Case Nos.:
(S207078)

~~~Date~~~
~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012
Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012
Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012
Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy
(949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris
Attorney General
(916) 445-9555
1300 I Street, Ste. 1740
Sacramento, CA 95814-2919
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

January 03, 2013 | Version 2012.0
Home | Help | Site Map | Contact Us | About Us | FAQ | Website Policies and Notices | Privacy Policy | USA.GOV Supreme Court of the United States

Share
Posted on | January 4, 2013 | No Comments
Roger Beckham
8:23 AM (10 minutes ago)
to me
Orly:
Thanks for your continuing efforts despite corrupt judges!
God bless you and be safe,
Roger
“The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” Thomas Jefferson
Share
Category: Uncategorized
Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 33 Comments
American Fan of Orly 8 approved
Submitted on 2013/01/02 at 8:00 pm
I am still waiting for WND to cover your case, Dr. Taitz…
All their huffing and puffing about the Constitution, and they give you less coverage than the HuffingPuffing Post….
I guess Farah by “a Free Press for a free people”, means that in doublespeakese for “a PC Press for a duped people”…
Anyhow, I for one don’t like how his new site is transmogrifing into a dept store.. money for liberty seems to be the ethic at WND.com
Chuck Norris should be ashamed to be associated…
And for WND to constantly quote scripture for their audience, is nothing short of sacrilege…
I am still waiting for WND to cover your case, Dr. Taitz…</p> <p>All their huffing and puffing about the Constitution, and they give you less coverage than the HuffingPuffing Post….</p> <p>I guess Farah by “a Free Press for a free people”, means that in doublespeakese for “a PC Press for a duped people”…</p> <p>Anyhow, I for one don’t like how his new site is transmogrifing into a dept store.. money for liberty seems to be the ethic at WND.com</p> <p>Chuck Norris should be ashamed to be associated…</p> <p>And for WND to constantly quote scripture for their audience, is nothing short of sacrilege…
Share
Category: Uncategorized

This order was issued at 5:17pm by Judge England, confirming that each side gets 20 minutes at tomorrow’s hearing per local rules

Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 64 Comments
Grinols order 20 minutes for hearing
Share
Category: Uncategorized

Our corrupt and treasonous media refuses to report on a case, where second amendment right to bear arms exercised by a citizen saved countless lives

Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 13 Comments

Fw: Hey CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN

January 02, 2013 2:19 PM
Subject: Fw: Hey CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN`
On Sunday December 17, 2012, 2 days after the CT shooting, a man went to a restaurant in San Antonio to kill his X-girlfriend. After he shot her, most of the people in the restaurant fled next door to a theater. The gunman followed them and entered the theater so he could shoot more people. He started shooting and people in the theater started running and screaming. It’s like the Aurora, CO theater story plus a restaurant!
Now aren’t you wondering why this isn’t a lead story in the national media along with the school shooting?
There was an off duty county deputy at the theater. SHE pulled out her gun and shot the man 4 times before he had a chance to kill anyone. So since this story makes the point that the best thing to stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun, the media is treating it like it never happened.
Only the local media covered it. The city is giving her a medal next week.

Share
Category: Uncategorized
Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 5 Comments
Kevin Stanfield invited you to his event:
January 2 at online planning
Miki Booth, Nancy Riley and 4 others are guests
Share
Category: Uncategorized

List of witnesses e-mailed to the court, US Attorney’s office and Attorney General’s office

Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 34 Comments
Olsen, Edward (USACAE)
2:31 PM (14 minutes ago)
to me, george.waters
Orly – Please email me a list of the witnesses you are hoping to present tomorrow. –Edward
From: Olsen, Edward (USACAE) Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:35 AM To: ‘Orly Taitz’; SDeutsch@caed.uscourts.gov Cc: george.waters@doj.ca.gov Subject: RE: Request for clarification in regards to time allowed for January 3rd TRO Grinols et al v Electoral college et al
I’d strongly oppose such a request. –Edward Olsen, AUSA
From: Orly Taitz [mailto:orly.taitz@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:28 AM To: SDeutsch@caed.uscourts.gov Cc: Olsen, Edward (USACAE); george.waters@doj.ca.gov Subject: Re: Request for clarification in regards to time allowed for January 3rd TRO Grinols et al v Electoral college et al
One of my witnesses is flying from Florida
Will Judge England entertain a motion to extend time for the oral argument and witness testimony
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:20 AM, <SDeutsch@caed.uscourts.gov> wrote:
Good morning again and thank you for your question. The Court will permit each side twenty minutes total to present their arguments, which includes any and all witnesses.
________________________________ Stephanie Deutsch, Courtroom Deputy to Judge England United States District Court 501 I Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 930.4207 sdeutsch@caed.uscourts.gov
From: Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com> To: sdeutsch@caed.uscourts.gov Cc: edward.olsen@usdoj.gov,george.waters@doj.ca.gov,orly.taitz@gmail.com Date: 12/28/2012 04:05 PM
Subject: Request for clarification in regards to time allowed for January 3rd TRO Grinols et al v Electoral college et al

Dear Stephanie, please let me know how much time will Judge England allow for the presentation of the TRO Motion. I would like to bring witnesses and would like to know, how much time will the court allow Respectfully Attorney for Plaintiffs in Grinols et al v Electoral college et al 12-cv-2997
– Dr Orly TaitzESQ 29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603 orlytaitzesq.com


Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603
orlytaitzesq.com
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
Orly Taitz <orly.taitz@gmail.com>
2:41 PM (4 minutes ago)
to Edward, sdeutsch, george.waters
List of witnesses
1. Paul Irey (you have his affidavit and article) former employee of National Security agency, 57 years of experince in typesetting, typing systems and computer graphics
2. Pamela Barnett U.S. army intelligence officer seeking to authenticate a FOIA response from the state department as was received by Chris Strunck (you have FOIA in exhibits)
3. possibly former senior officer of Scotland Yard elite unit of anti Communist Proliferation and anti organized crime Neil Sankey
Share
Category: Uncategorized

NOTICE of subpoena/ Touhy request for TECS DOHS SQ-14 records of travel 1980-1981 under the name Obama, Soetoro, Soebarkah from Timothy Geithner, Secretary of Treasury and from NARA by All Plaintiffs re [13] Minute Order,,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,,. (Taitz, Orly)

Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 14 Comments
Grinols subpoena Touhy request Geithner
Notices
CIVIL
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of California – Live System
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 1/2/2013 at 2:30 PM PST and filed on 1/2/2013
Case Name:
Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Case Number:
Filer:
James Grinols
Keith Judd
Thomas Gregory MacLeran
Edward Noonan
Robert Odden
Document Number:
Docket Text: NOTICE of subpoena/ Touhy request for TECS DOHS SQ-14 records of travel 1980-1981 under the name Obama, Soetoro, Soebarkah from Timothy Geithner, Secretary of Treasury and from NARA by All Plaintiffs re [13] Minute Order,,, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings,,. (Taitz, Orly)
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Edward A Olsen , GOVT edward.olsen@usdoj.gov, karen.james@usdoj.gov, monica.lee@usdoj.gov, teisha.apelar@usdoj.gov
George Michael Waters george.waters@doj.ca.gov, lydia.sandoval@doj.ca.gov
Orly Taitz orly.taitz@gmail.com, dr_taitz@yahoo.com
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1064943537 [Date=1/2/2013] [FileNumber=5896984-0] [a3fc16e6add9073bb69e9c738c6f13bcb4b50ea8c259240b138b7a7dfad0114500b6 102148a00c91e986d1168b5b8a3e455fed49f9c1bf7f4691e37c415cff1d]]
Share
Category: Uncategorized

a woman by name Linda Montreson, who is either an obot or a moron wrote to the court. I asked the deputy to disregard her e-mail

Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 8 Comments
Share
Category: Uncategorized

affidavit of Chief investigator for Coast Guard and senior ICE investigator attesting to forgery in Obama’s Selective Service certificate

Posted on | January 2, 2013 | 8 Comments
Affidavit of Stephen Coffman
Share
Category: Uncategorized
  •  
Search for:[Search]

·         Official website for Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012

·         Official Facebook


·         Recent Posts

·         IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!

Historic DVD Now Available!DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling. --------- To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.

·         My RSS Feed

·         Other Sites

·         Blogroll

·         Media Links

·         Advertisement / Sponsors

Vote Dr. Orly Taitz for U.S. Senate 2012 in CA


--------------------------------------
Please make a donation to Dr. Orly Taitz for CA U.S. Senate 2012 Campaign
--------------------------------------

29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687



--------------------------------------

Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld

--------------------------------------

Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal

--------------------------------------


--------------------------------------

Orly Taitz Photo Collections

·        

--
Dr Orly TaitzESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411  fax949-766-7603 

OPC IS NOT A PRE-NESARA PROGRAM

OPC Process --- Clarification

OPC is NOT  a pre-Nesara program. We are simply making a connection with those who are in need with those blessed with huge financial wind falls. These windfalls are NOT limited to Nesara programs.

Application data is secure and private. 

That's is all.

John MacHaffie  HIS humble servant

About the NESARA FUND ...The golden ball gets rolling again but in a different light


             Hello All:
                      You need to read this before you sign up for any NESARA program.
                              God Bless  Love to all Smile Red rose Red heart

             

About the NESARA FUND ...The golden ball gets rolling again but in a different light

Extract from article full link to article below :
A word of warning as to the so-called ‘Pre-Nesara funds’ as there is no such thing as an application in advance and certainly not by means of filling in a form which requests you hand over all your personal data. By filling in that form you put yourself in a vulnerable, weak position by putting your cards on the table for the dark ones to see. Such things do not pertain to my NESARA : it is a misleading project! So be extremely cautious! NESARA will come to pass for every individual on the exact same time : there are no favourites and you are not required to introduce yourself. We know all too well who you are in your Presences and everyone will receive their rightful part in all freedom and this will be so for all of you and only through me! I am the supervisor of the NESARA project and I guard it wholeheartedly...full article @

http://pleiadedolphininfos.blogspot.be/2013/01/saint-germain-to-me-...

The Silver Price is 100% Rigged By Computers from these 9 Banks


Subject: The Silver Price is 100% Rigged By Computers from these 9 Banks
I have a goal this year.

It is to stop the blatant manipulation of silver. For a long time we didn't know who was doing it or how they were doing it but now we know. We know EVERYTHING!

These are the 9 banks that rig the silver market...

Barclays
Bank of America
Credit Suisse
JP Morgan
Deutsche Bank
HSBC
Societe Generale
UBS AG
Mitsui

These banks dominate 99% of the silver trading volume through computer programs trading back and forth to each other in order to control the price of silver.

These banks have also been implicated in the LIBOR rate fixing scandal working out of the same location as the LBMA Silver trading offices in London!

The below interview outlines the game and below the interview is a letter I sent to the CFTC demanding their assistance in ending the manipulation of silver.

The Silver Price is 100% Rigged By Computers from these 9 Banks

I know that many have given up on the CFTC but I WILL not give up until they do their job. Send them my letter or write your own.

It's where the battle had begin and where it must end.

May the Road you choose be the Right Road.

Bix Weir

"War is a Racket" by General Smedley Butler


Subject: "War is a Racket" by General Smedley Butler

Visit WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS ! at: http://wramsite.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network
To control which emails you receive on WELL REGULATED AMERICAN MILITIAS !, click here

It’s time for the GOP to get a new playbook


I don't know about you, but I think the GOP needs some drastic changes.
Here are a few ideas,some of which were echoed by Newt Gingrich this
afternoon on the Sean Hannity show.  When Speaker of the House Newt
Gingrich was in charge of the House, the GOP set the agenda, it wasn't the
other way around.

What do you think?

It’s time for the GOP to get a new playbook & use its powerful young
bench<http://www.irishcentral.com/story/news/from-the-right/its-time-for-the-gop-to-get-a-new-playbook--use-its-powerful-young-bench-185477851.html>
*Ed Farnan
Journalist/Advocate
New media-Television-Radio
Web http://www.irishcentral.com/story/news/from-the-right/
Twitter @EDinCali*
*Email edf0483@gmail.com*

80 mph at 66 cents per gallon

Subject: 80 mph at 66 cents per gallon

What happens when you
run a gar on natural gas?

Some very surprising things.

Video:

http://www.realecontv.com/page/21789.html

- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.

================================

Visit out partner sites:

The Real Food Channel: http://RealFoodChannel.com
The truth about the food you eat

Real Econ TV: http://RealEconTV.com
Financial news without the big bank baloney

Jazz on the Tube: http://JazzontheTube.com
Take a jazz break

================================
Brasscheck TV
2380 California St.
San Francisco, CA 94115

To unsubscribe or change subscriber options visit:
http://www.aweber.com/z/r/?zAxs7OwctKyMLAwsbBwctEa0jGycbAwcTKw=


What is the greatest killer of all-time?


Subject: What is the greatest killer of all-time?




This is derived from the JPFO website page - as a more printer-friendly option. The complete web page is accompanied by a detailed promotion of the Death by “Gun Control” book, written by Aaron Zelman and Richard W.Stevens - and available from the JPFO store . It works on a level that nobody can dispute: documented world history.

Here's the Formula: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide

What makes the argument so powerful? Two factors. First, it makes common sense: unarmed defenseless people have no hope against armed aggressors. Second, it states the historical truth: evil governments did wipe out 170,000,000 innocent non-military lives in the 20th Century alone.  See the film “Innocents Betrayed” for further chilling evidence, also available from the JPFO store.

When the gun prohibitionists quote a statistic about how many people are killed by firearms misuse, the discussion sometimes bogs down into whose crime statistics to believe and how to count crimes vs. the defensive firearm uses.

In the 20th Century:

• Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined.

• Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals.
How could governments kill so many people? The governments had the power - and the people, the victims, were unable to resist. The victims were unarmed.




$16 Trillion Dollars in Debt!!!!!
Our Federal Government is $16 trillion dollars ($16,000,000,000,000) in debt!  (See http://www.usdebtclock.org)
Don’t we want to have a future?  Don’t we want our children to have a future?
The Federal Government and Corporate Lobbyists have done this to us.
Would a good Federal Government or good Political Parties do this to their citizens?
Democrats and Republicans get their funding from the same multi-national corporate controllers, and these corporations care nothing about America (only about their major shareholders and agenda).  Therefore, the two parties use different rhetoric to divide We the People, but they actually play for the same team and serve the save program (and it’s not to our benefit)!
Escape the False Left-Right Paradigm
Go to Infowars.com to Learn the History of Government Corruption
Get involved.  Go to http://www.infowars.com and http://www.wearechange.org to find how to help you, your family, your nation and your world.  There are already millions who are aware and are working for the betterment of humankind.  Together we are strong.
Listen via Phone 24/7: (512) 646-5000 or (712) 338-8300
NH Free State Project:
http://freestateproject.org/    Phone 24/7: (213) 493-0308 freetalklive.com
The Bill of Rights is a crown jewel in the history of political thought. However, in U.S. history, it has not always been provided to all the people.
Know your rights. Do not give your rights up to the state (unless you eventually want a black boot on the throat of you and your progeny).
The Bill of Rights Amendments:
1) Freedom of Speech and Religious Belief (and/or the right to question) for ALL people
2) The right of the populace to defend themselves.
3) The state can't force you to quarter military
4) The right to due process and the freedom from illegal search and seizure even upon your person (not just your property).
5) The freedom from self-incrimination.
6) The right to a speedy trial.
7) The right to a civil trial.
8) Freedom from indefinite detention and torture
9 & 10) The right to govern at the local level, where people are closest to problems and have a vested interest in applying proper solutions.





--
Please Note: If you hit "REPLY", your message will be sent to everyone on this mailing list (ronpaul-48@meetup.com)
This message was sent by MayorCurley (mayorcurley@hotmail.com) from Campaign for Liberty Clearwater.
To learn more about MayorCurley, visit his/her member profile
Set my mailing list to email me As they are sent | In one daily email | Don't send me mailing list messages

Meetup, PO Box 4668 #37895 New York, New York 10163-4668 | support@meetup.com

The Real NESARA? ---- Discernment Advised


 THIS IS A CLAIM MADE BY THE AUTHOR NOT VERIFIED


The Real NESARA?

There has been a lot of talk in chat recently about NESARA. Many do not know what it is or what it is about. I thought it important to point out that there are actually 2 versions of this proposal. The original one was first published in 1996 by Dr. Barnard. Shortly afterwards, certain people latched onto the NESARA idea and began promoting a different version of this story. I though it was important to point this out and so as you are researching this topic, be diligent and sure of which version you are researching and promoting. Don't believe everything someone tells you or that you read. You must do your own research and decide for yourself which version you believe or want to promote. Here is a link that explains a few items. For your reading pleasure... http://nesara.org/articles/the_real_nesara.htm

Here is some more interesting info regarding the revised NESARA website and people. Please read and decide for yourself if you believe in this other NESARA.

From the January 2009 Idaho Observer:
NESARA: Setting the record straight

NESARA was originally the work of systems analyst Dr. Harvey Barnard who, in 1996, attempted to inspire a grassroots monetary education and legislator-outreach effort to compel economic policy reform in the U.S. before it was too late. The term "NESARA" was coopted by the "Dove of Oneness" and a strange cast of occultic characters. Whether "Dove" et. al are "covert agents of the dark forces" or just petty opportunists, they have marginalized the name of Dr. Barnard and his efforts. NESARA, which was Dr. Barnard’s well-intended, albiet partially flawed, attempt at monetary reform, is now synonymous with the promise of alien political intervention, celestially-sanctioned fiat-money payouts and secret acts of Congress passed under pressure from the White Knights—an anonymous cadre of benevolent power-elites working behind the scenes to deliver the people of earth into an enlightened age of peace, love and prosperity. Nearly all of our readers are aware of NESARA and many more have an emotional or financial interest in the truth about the occultic perversion of NESARA while others believe they have a spiritual investment in helping The Dove of Oneness et. al deliver NESARA. We hope that the following report will help our readers better understand NESARA so their finite energies and resources may be expended where they will be most useful.

By Anne Wilder Chamberlain

Since the late 1990s, the term "NESARA" has come up in both patriot and new age circles as the ultimate solution to America’s financial woes. At last, many people were given hope that there were lightworkers secretly working within our own government that would rescue us from the satanic clutches of an out-of-control military-industrial complex. In fact, NESARA is an acronym for the "National Economic Stabilization And Recovery Act," an economic reform proposal drafted by Dr. Harvey Barnard. This proposal was promptly hijacked by a few con-artists seizing an opportunity to prey on the ignorant and their monies. Their co-opted version is the NESARA most people have come to know.

Systems analysis

Dr. Harvey Barnard earned a Ph.D. in Applied Science specializing in Systems Philosophy. Married to the girl down the street, he worked most of his adult life serving heavy industry in technical and engineering fields as a systems troubleshooter, educator, and consultant. He started his search for the root cause and solutions to America’s social problems in the 1960s when a professor at Louisiana State University remarked that social and economic problems could be analyzed and solved with the same tools and techniques used to solve industrial problems. For more than 30 years he studied currency, banking, economics, taxes, law, philosophy, history, sociology, and politics using the analytical principles of systems theory.

In the late 1980s Dr. Barnard developed his NESARA legislative proposal for monetary and fiscal policy reform in order to double the standard of living for every American within one generation. In 1996 he printed 1,000 copies of Draining the Swamp, which contained his NESARA proposal, and sent them to members of Congress and others, believing the proposal would pass quickly on its merits. It included replacing the income tax with a national sales tax, abolishing compound interest on secured loans and returning to a bimetallic currency.

Based on a theory that debt is the number one economic factor inhibiting the growth of the economy and compound interest the number one "moral evil" and reason for debt, Dr. Barnard made several attempts to draw political attention to the problems he saw in the U.S. economy.

The proposals were never introduced by Congress, although the Treasury Department acknowledged them and Congressman Ron Paul once commented on them. In 1999 Dr. Bernard released the proposal to the public domain and published it on the internet at his website at www.nesara.org. In 2001 he established the NESARA Institute, a non-profit educational organization that maintains the website.

The loonies latch on

Shortly afterwards, people began to latch on and promote a radically different version of NESARA. This alternate version maintained that NESARA was enacted into law secretly during the Clinton administration, and that there are "White Knights" working tirelessly behind the political scenes to bring forth this secret monetary reform act.

An Internet entity known as "Dove of Oneness" began posting stories about NESARA in on-line forums. "Dove" has been identified as Shaini Goodwin, a former student of The Ramtha School Of Enlightenment. According to Goodwin’s web site, www.nesara.us, the NESARA bill was secretly passed in March, 2000, as the National Economic Security and Reformation Act. It included cancelling all personal debts, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, declaring world peace, and requiring "constitutionally acceptable NESARA" candidates. Goodwin asserts that the new law was to be announced in 2001, but a gag order was issued by the Supreme Court, under penalty of death. Goodwin also purports that Bush orchestrated the September 11, 2001 attacks and the Iraq War as distractions from NESARA.

Wikipedia claims the altered NESARA was designed primarily to provide an income to Goodwin and others. Investigators found Goodwin’s NESARA plan began in connection with Omega Trust, a fraudulent investment scheme whose creator, Clyde Hood, was on trial at the time. According to Goodwin, Omega Trust investors would receive their returns after NESARA was announced. Goodwin repeatedly predicted that the NESARA announcement would occur in the very near future, and frequently asked supporters to donate money and frequent flyer miles so she could travel around the world to secretly meet with high-level government officials about getting NESARA announced.

Supporter Jennifer Lee published "Dove’s" NESARA status reports almost daily on her now defunct website and discussed a host of other-worldly and "interdimensional" beings helping behind the scenes to get NESARA announced. According to quatloos.com, towards the end of her message, Jennifer would spin a sob story about not being able to pay the rent, or her phone bill, or her electric bill; or she asked for money to "help" somebody else out.

Scams and fraud

"Dove" and others, from time to time, directed their adherents to purchase units in one or another of their "Prosperity Programs." Despite the now proven fraudulent nature of these scams, NESARA promoters claim that these programs will eventually pay out millions of dollars for every $100 sent when the "true NESARA law" is finally announced.

These scam artists attached themselves to any popular financial theory floating on the Internet. When the $27.5 trillion Leo Wanta caper was publicized in 2003, NESARA theorists claimed that this money was soon to be given to the American public after NESARA was announced. Once again, it never came to fruition.

Alien Intervention?

One supporter, Sheldan Nidle, ties the imminent NESARA announcement to his years-old prophesy of an imminent UFO invasion by benevolent aliens (see paoweb.com).

Other NESARA supporters, such as Ashtarontheroad.com, agree that otherworldly beings are working to get NESARA announced. These include a "channeled spirit" called "Hatonn" and another called "Sananda" (claiming to be Jesus) along with "Saint Germain," a deity borrowed from the "I AM Movement" and the "Church Universal and Triumphant," which has come down from heaven to physically meet with heads of banks and world leaders regarding the NESARA announcement. Benevolent aliens are also frequently mentioned, one of which is "Ashtar," pictured on the website as an angelic looking blonde.

The Ashtar group promoted "We the People for Peace" in 2007, asking followers to send out petitions requesting their "representatives" in Congress to kindly step down for not representing them by ending the Iraq War. This effort never got off the ground. They followed this with an agenda pushing support for Rep. Kucinich’s Articles of Impeachment.

All these groups predict the arrest of Bush, Cheney, et al, so that the "Prosperity Programs" and NESARA can finally come into fruition. Then came emails promoting Barack Obama as Bush’s antithesis, with total disregard to his cabinet choices selected from the Monsanto-Goldman Sachs-Citigroup-Bilderberg-Military Industrial corporatocracy (see American Free Press 12-22-08).

Magic Fix-all

On December 23, 2008, the Ashtar group posted a notice on a citizen based website, www.change.us, not to be confused with Obama’s www.change.gov. The notice reads:

"N.E.S.A.R.A. is a secret ‘National Treasure,’ a bold transformational Law perfectly ripe for this now moment. [NESARA] will Forgive Credit Card debt, student loans, and most mortgages due to illegal banking and government activities. (It also pays banks $9,000 for every credit card forgiven, regardless of the balance). It eliminates the Federal Reserve and abolishes IRS, creates a flat rate on non-essentials. It restores Constitutional Law, Liberty and Sovereignty and a U.S. Treasury Banking system backed by precious metals for stability. It allows for PEACE and prosperity for all, providing funding for humanitarian purposes, new technologies and alternative energy and healing. This Divine plan removes the Patriot ACT, restores financial privacy, ensures accurate elections, and holds all leaders accountable. A partial history can be found at www.nesara.us and no part of this Law is available to the public at this time. So if this sounds good to you…Demand it be revealed."

On "his" own website "Ashtar" adds, "There are three outstanding beings that have the most ability, the most empowerment to get NESARA officially announced. We shall name these wondrous beings. Their names are: Pelosi, she’s in the House of Representatives; then you have Senator Reid, he is in the Senate, and then, of course, you have President-Elect Obama."

Disinformation and the original NESARA

Dr. Barnard became aware of Goodwin’s description of NESARA before his death in 2005. He denied that NESARA had been enacted into law or even assigned a tracking number, and condemned Goodwin’s allegations. Goodwin countered, claiming the NESARA Institute was a disinformation front for the Bush family and other nefarious "New World Order" organizations, and says Dr. Barnard’s NESARA is merely a ploy to distract people from knowing the "true" NESARA.

The entire proposal and comparisons with the Monetary Reform Act and the proposals of G. Edward Griffin, can be found at Dr. Barnard’s site which also states, "A couple of mouse clicks will dispel rumors [that the bill is actually law]."

The original NESARA

Dr. Barnard’s NESARA would abolish the Federal Reserve System and replace it with a new Treasury Reserve System with a mandate of maintaining a stable currency of gold and silver coins and gold and silver certificates. With debt-free currency, there would be no debt being created that is owed to private entities. The Income Tax would be eliminated, taxing consumption instead with a sales tax of 14 percent. Many items would be exempt, such as government mandated expenses like licenses and permits; essentials like food, medical expenses, housing, livestock, insurance, labor; and anything that is non-profit in nature.

Though Dr. Barnard’s NESARA was a noble attempt to bring monetary reform to the U.S. before it was too late, it advocated transferring control of the "currency" from the private banks of the Fed to control by Congress, which hasn’t shown itself to be any more fiscally responsible than the Fed. Constitutionally, Congress is only authorized to coin money, not set reserve requirements, which the proposed bill allots to them.

To his credit, Dr. Barnard sought to jumpstart a grass roots movement of people who want to heal America by investing their time to read, copy and reproduce, support or denounce, amend or create their own version of his Act, and introduce it to Congress as part of a nationwide public outreach and monetary education effort. Instead, the disinformation campaign emanating from The Dove, et. al, has reduced the credibility of Dr. Barnard’s efforts to nil.

Dr. Barnard believed that no meaningful social reform is possible without a fair and equitable monetary system for all people, not just the politically privileged. While the NESARA Institute understands the emotional and psychological reasons why people support the co-opted versions of NESARA, "a life of social liberty begins first and foremost with self-responsibility." Dr. Bernard’s NESARA, however flawed it might be, is based upon facts and research which he advanced with noble intentions.

http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2013/01/setting-the-record-straight-the-real-nesara-posted-at-oom-thursday-evening-by-spirit12.html

Tax Exemption Through Use of Lawful Money to End the Fed



StormThunder

When you hear thunder, the storm is coming.

Tax Exemption: http://stormthunder.com/#ixzz2GxzRPPJG 
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives

Tax Exemption Through Use of Lawful Money to End the Fed

The truth about the income tax, the national debt, the Federal Reserve, and what you can do about it.

Send this page to everyone you know. Post it on your Facebook, send it to your email address book, get the word out that the days of slavery are over.
Fed Note vs US Note
Top: Federal Reserve Note. Bottom: United States Note
Besides the “Federal Reserve Note” on the scroll at the top of the note, the fed note has a green seal and serial numbers and the US note has red.
Use the green money, the debt grows and you own nothing. Use the red money, the debt goes down, you are tax exempt, and you own what you buy. Simple as that.

The following article explains the legalities in detail along with the remedyTHIS IS NOT THEORY, THIS IS FACT. IGNORE THIS AND YOU DESERVE WHAT’S COMING:

Public Money vs. Private Credit
July 4, 1861 Abraham Lincoln re-convenes congress under an ‘extraordinary occasion’ that is technically still in-place today [Lincoln's order convening Congress was by proclamation set forth 15 April 1861]. It had adjourned sine die since March 28 1861 [by March 28, the southern congressmen had walked out of session. That, combined with uncertainty as to Lincoln's military intentions, led the remaining members of the 37th Congress to agree to adjourn without setting a day to reconvene — sine die means without day]. The congress today is still a [Lincoln convened, executive] de-facto congress. [To my knowledge, congress still adjourns sine-die, informing members of the re-convention date during the recess]
Twenty eight days prior to congress adjourning sine die, we find that the territory of Colorado was formed and would have taken 30 days to form properly. President Buchannan was actually lining up Colorado with the gold claims found in Aurora and Central City to be the war chest for prosecuting the war between the states [erroneously referred to by many as a civil war — which it was not] from the union side. Colorado was basically a union state.
President Lincoln got the election, so he moved into President Buchanan’s plans. The first territorial governor, governor Gilpen, issued notes. These are the predecessors to the United States notes called green-backs. If we take a look at the treasury, their website, we find this particular page regarding legal tender
Legal tender status. Now pay particular notice to the bottom of the page:
United States notes serve no function that is not already adequately served by Federal Reserve notes. As a result, the Treasury Department stopped issuing United States notes, and none have been placed into circulation since January 21, 1971.
[Article published by Freedom League 1984:]
When Congress borrows money on the credit of the United States, bonds are thus legislated into existence and deposited as credit entries in Federal Reserve banks. United States bonds, bills and notes constitute money as affirmed by the Supreme Court (Legal Tender Cases, 110 US 421), and this money when deposited with the Fed becomes collateral from whence the Treasury may write checks against the credit thus created in its account (12 USC 391). For example: suppose Congress appropriates an expenditure of $1 billion.
To finance the appropriation, Congress creates the $1 billion worth of bonds out of thin air [actually, created upon a presumption — see David's comment below] and deposits it with the privately owned Federal Reserve System. Upon receiving the bonds, the Fed credits $1 billion to the Treasury’s checking account, holding the deposited bonds as collateral. When the United States deposits its bonds with the Federal Reserve System, private credit is extended to the Treasury by the Fed.
Under its power to borrow money, Congress is authorized by the Constitution to contract debt, and whenever something is borrowed it must be returned. When Congress spends the contracted private credit, each use of credit is debt which must be returned to the lender or Fed.
Since Congress authorizes the expenditure of this private credit, the United States incurs the primary obligation to return the borrowed credit, creating a National Debt which results when credit is not returned. However, if anyone else accepts this private credit and uses it to purchase goods and services, the user voluntarily incurs the obligation requiring him to make a return of income whereby a portion of the income is collected by the IRS and delivered to the Federal Reserve banksters.
Actually the federal income tax imparts two separate obligations: the obligation to file a return and the obligation to abide by the Internal Revenue Code. The obligation to make a return of income for using private credit is recognized in law as an irrecusable obligation, which according the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1914 ed.), is “a term used to indicate a certain class of contractual obligations recognized by the law which are imposed upon a person without his consent and without regard to any act of his own”.
This is distinguished from a recusable obligation which, according to Bouvier, arises from a voluntary act by which one incurs the obligation imposed by the operation of law. The voluntary use of private credit is the condition precedent which imposes the irrecusable obligation to file a tax return. If private credit is not used or rejected, then the operation of law which imposes the irrecusable obligation lies dormant and cannot apply.
In Brushaber v. Union Pacific RR Co., 240 US 1 (1916) the Supreme Court affirmed that the federal income tax is in the class of indirect taxes, which include duties and excises. The personal income tax arises from a duty — i.e., charge or fee — which is voluntarily incurred and subject to the rule of uniformity. A charge is a duty or obligation, binding upon him who enters into it, which may be removed or taken away by a discharge (performance) Bouvier, p 459.
Our federal personal income tax is not really a tax in the ordinary sense of the word but rather a burden or obligation which the taxpayer voluntarily assumes, and the burden of the tax falls upon those who voluntarily use private credit. Simply stated, the tax imposed is a charge or fee upon the use of private credit where the amount of private credit used measures the pecuniary obligation.
The personal income tax provision of the Internal Revenue Code is private law rather than public law. “A private law is one which is confined to particular individuals, associations, or corporations”: 50 Am.Jur.: 12 p 28. In the instant case the revenue code pertains to taxpayers. A private law can be enforced by a court of competent jurisdiction when statutes for its enforcement are enacted: 20 Am.Jur.: 33. pg. 58, 59.
The distinction between public and private acts is not always sharply defined when published statutes are printed in their final form: Case v. Kelly, 133 US 21 (1890). Statutes creating corporations are private acts: 20 Am.Jur. 35, p 60. In this connection, the Federal Reserve Act is private law. Federal Reserve banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act: Armano v. Federal Reserve Bank, 468 F.Supp. 674 (1979).
A private act may be published as a public law when the general public is afforded the opportunity of participating in the operation of the private law. The Internal Revenue Code is an example of private law which does not exclude the voluntary participation of the general public. Had the Internal Revenue Code been written as substantive public law, the code would be repugnant to the Constitution, since no one could be compelled to file a return and thereby become a witness against himself.
Under the fifty titles listed on the preface page of the United States Code, the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) is listed as having not been enacted as substantive public law, conceding that the Internal Revenue Code is private law. Bouvier declares that private law “relates to private matters which do not concern the public at large.” It is the voluntary use of private credit which imposes upon the user the quasi contractual or implied obligation to make a return of income. In Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust Co., 158 US 601 (1895), the Supreme Court had declared the income tax of 1894 to be repugnant to the Constitution, holding that taxation of rents, wages and salaries must conform to the rule of apportionment.
However, when this decision was rendered, there was no privately owned central bank, issuing private credit and currency, but rather public money in the form of legal tender notes and coins of the United States circulated. Public money is the lawful money of the United States which the Constitution authorizes Congress to issue, conferring a property right, whereas the private credit issued by the Fed is neither money nor property, permitting the user an equitable interest but denying allodial title. [In other words, you cannot really 'buy' anything with Federal Reserve Notes.]
Today, we have two competing monetary systems: The Federal Reserve System with its private credit and currency, and the public money system consisting of legal tender United States Notes and coins. One could use the public money system, paying all bills with coins and United States notes (if the notes can be obtained), or one could voluntarily use the private credit system and thereby incur the obligation to make a return of income. Under 26 USC 7609 the IRS has carte blanche authority to summon and investigate bank records for the purpose of determining tax liabilities or discovering unknown taxpayers: United States v. Berg, 636 F.2d 203 (1980).
If an investigation of bank records discloses an excess of $1000 in deposits in a single year, the IRS may accept this as prima facie evidence that the account holder uses private credit and is therefore a person obligated to make a return of income. Anyone who uses private credit — e.g. bank accounts, credit cards, mortgages, etc — voluntarily plugs himself into the system and obligates himself to file.
A Taxpayer is allowed to claim a $1000 personal deduction when filing his return. The average taxpayer in the course of a year uses United States coins in vending machines, parking meters, small change, etc, and this public money must be deducted when computing the charge for using private credit.
On June 5, 1933, the day of infamy arrived. Congress on that date enacted House Joint Resolution 192, which provided that the people [actually, HJR-192 applied only to corporate persons, not to people] convert or turn in their gold coins in exchange for Federal Reserve notes. Through the operation of law, HJR-192 took us off the gold standard and placed us on the dollar standard where the dollar could be manipulated by private interests for their self-serving benefit. By this single act the people and their wealth were delivered to the bankers. When gold coinage was thus pulled out of circulation, large denomination Federal Reserve notes were issued to fill the void. As a consequence the public money supply in circulation was greatly diminished, and the debt-laden private credit of the Fed gained supremacy.
This action made private individuals who had been previously exempt from federal income taxes now liable for them, since the general public began consuming and using large amounts of private credit. Notice all the case law prior to 1933 which affirms that income is a profit or gain which arises from a government granted privilege.
After 1933, however, the case law no longer emphatically declares that income is exclusively corporate profit, or that it arises from a privilege. So, what changed? Two years after HJR-192, Congress passed the Social Security Act, which the Supreme Court upheld as a valid act imposing a valid income tax: Charles C. Steward Mach. Co v. Davis, 301 US 548 (1937).
It is no accident that the United States is without a dollar unit coin. In recent years the Eisenhower dollar coin received widespread acceptance, but the Treasury minted them in limited number which encouraged hoarding. This same fate befell the Kennedy half-dollars, which circulated as silver sandwiched clads between 1965 and 1969, and were hoarded for their intrinsic value and not spent. Next came the Susan B. Anthony dollar, an awkward coin which was instantly rejected as planned.
The remaining unit is the privately issued Federal Reserve note unit dollar with no viable competitors. Back in 1935 the Fed had persuaded the Treasury to discontinue minting silver dollars because the public preferred them over dollar bills. That the public money system has become awkward, discouraging its use, is no accident. It was planned that way.
A major purpose behind the 16th amendment was to give Congress authority to enforce private law collections of revenue. Congress had the plenary power to collect income taxes arising from government granted privileges long before the 16th Amendment was ratified, and the amendment was unnecessary, except to give Congress the added power to enforce collections under private law, i.e. income from whatever source.
So, the Fed got its amendment and its private income tax, which is a banker’s dream but a nightmare for everyone else. Through the combined operation of the Fed and HJR-192, the United States pays exorbitant interest whenever it uses its own money deposited with the Fed, and the people pay outrageous income taxes for the privilege of living and working in their own country, robbed of their wealth and separated from their rights, laboring under a tax system written by a cabal of loan shark bankers and rubber stamped by a spineless Congress.
Congress has the power to abolish the Federal Reserve System and thus destroy the private credit system. However, the people have it within their power to strip the Fed of its powers, rescind private credit and get the bankers to pay off the National Debt should Congress fail to act.
The key to all this is 12 USC 411, which declares that Federal Reserve notes shall be redeemed in lawful money at any Federal Reserve Bank. Lawful money is defined as all the coins, notes, bills, bonds and securities of the United States. Julliard v. Greenman, 110 US 421, 448 (1884): whereas public money is the lawful money declared by Congress as a legal tender for debts (31 USC 5103), 521 F.2d 629 (1974).
Anyone can present Federal Reserve notes to any Federal Reserve Bank and demand redemption in public money — i.e. legal tender United States notes and coins. A Federal Reserve note is a fixed obligation or evidence of indebtedness which pledges redemption (12 USC 411) in public money to the note holder.
The Fed maintain a ready supply of United States notes in hundred dollar denominations for redemption purposes should it be required, and coins are available to satisfy claims for smaller amounts. However, should the general public decide to redeem large amounts of private credit for public money, a financial melt-down within the Fed would quickly occur.
The process works like this: Suppose $1000 in Federal Reserve notes are presented for redemption in public money. To raise $1000 in public money the Fed must surrender US Bonds in that amount to the Treasury in exchange for the public money demanded (assuming that the Fed had no public money on hand). In so doing, $1000 of the National Debt would be paid off by the Fed and thus canceled.
Can you imagine the result if large amounts of Federal Reserve notes were redeemed on a regular ongoing basis? Private credit would be withdrawn from circulation and replaced with public money, and with each turning of the screw the Fed would be obliged to pay off more of the National Debt. Should the Fed refuse to redeem its notes in public money, then the fiction that private credit is used voluntarily would become unsustainable.
If the use of private credit becomes compulsory, then the obligation to make a return of income is voided. If the Fed is under no obligation to redeem its notes, then no one has an obligation to make a return of income. It is that simple! Federal Reserve notes are not money and cannot be tendered when money is demanded: 105 So. 305 (1925).
Moreover, the Ninth Circuit rejected the argument that a $50 Federal Reserve note be redeemed in gold or silver coin after specie coinage had been rescinded but upheld the right of the note holder to redeem his note in current public money (31 USC 392 rev., 5103): 524 F.2d 629 (1974), 12 USC 411.
It would be advantageous to close out all bank accounts, acquire a home safe, settle all debts in cash with public money and use US postal money orders for remittances. Whenever a check is received, present it to the bank of issue and demand cash in public money. This will place banks in a vulnerable position, forcing them to draw off their assets. Through their insatiable greed, bankers have over extended, making banks quite illiquid.
Should the people suddenly demand public money for their deposits and for checks received, many banks will collapse and be foreclosed by those demanding public money. Banks by their very nature are citadels of usury and sin, and the most patriotic service one could perform is to obligate bankers to redeem private credit.
When the first Federal Reserve note is presented to the Fed for redemption, the process of ousting the private credit system will commence and will not end until the Fed and banking system nurtured by it collapse. Coins comprise less than five percent of the currency, and current law limits the amount of United States notes in circulation to $300 million (31 USC 5115).
The private credit system is exceedingly over extended compared with the supply of public money, and a small minority working in concert can easily collapse the private credit system and oust the Fed by demanding redemption of private credit. If the Fed disappeared tomorrow, income taxes on wages and salaries would vanish with it. Moreover, the States are precluded from taxing United States notes: 4 Wheat. 316.
According to Bouvier, public money is the money which Congress can tax for public purposes mandated by the Constitution. Private credit when collected in revenue can fund programs and be spent for purposes not cognizable by the Constitution. We have in effect two competing governments: the United States Government and the Federal Government.
The first is the government of the people, whereas the Federal Government is founded upon private law and funded by private credit. What we really have is private government. Federal Agencies and activities funded by the private credit system include Social Security, bail out loans to bankers via the IMF, bail out loans to Chrysler, loans to students, FDIC, FBI, supporting the UN, foreign aid, funding undeclared wars, etc., all of which would be unsustainable if funded by taxes raised pursuant to the Constitution.
The personal income tax is not a true tax but rather an obligation or burden which is voluntarily assumed, since revenue is raised through voluntary contributions and can be spent for purposes unknown to the Constitution. Notice how the IRS declares in its publications that everyone is expected to contribute his fair share. True taxes must be spent for public purposes which the Constitution recognizes. Taxation for the purpose of giving or loaning money to private business enterprises and individuals is illegal: 15 Am.Rep. 39, Cooley, Prin. Const. Law, ch IV.
Revenue derived from the federal income tax goes into a private slush fund raised from voluntary contributions and Congress is not restricted by the Constitution when spending or disbursing the proceeds from this private fund. It is incorrect to say that the personal federal income tax is unconstitutional, since the tax code is private law and resides outside the Constitution.
The Internal Revenue Code is non-constitutional because it enforces an obligation which is voluntarily incurred through an act of the individual who binds himself. Fighting the Internal Revenue Code on constitutional grounds is wasted energy. The way to bring it all down is to attack the Federal Reserve System and its banking cohorts by demanding that private credit be redeemed, or by convincing Congress to abolish the Fed.
Never forget that private credit [central bank credit] is funding the destruction of our country.
[Reprinted from 'Freedom League', Sept/Oct 1984]
By demanding non-negotiable Federal Reserve Notes at the time of cashing any paycheck, you’re avoiding the taxable event:
Redeemed in lawful money Pursuant to 12 USC 411
:True Name: dba LEGAL NAME
You’re avoiding the activity — or the verb — of endorsement. [Actually, I believe it is a restrictive endorsement because it 'restricts' how the bank may negotiate the instrument.]
Negotiable instruments can be exchanged for other and presumably higher forms of currency. So a nonnegotiable Federal Reserve Note is a way of saying that you’re getting United States Notes instead. This is domestic emergency currency, instead of foreign emergency currency (Federal Reserve Notes). The problem with this non-endorsement as far as the bank is concerned, is that the bearer of the check is not pledging any credit; any private credit behind the check.
[The Story of Money — Federal Reserve Bank of New York]
The only bond behind the check is the presumed goods or services, and the full amount has to come out of the bank account of the drafter — whoever drafted the check. This means that the bank cannot do any fractional lending; for every $10 that’s put into the vault, they can’t lend out $90 more. And so this is what it means in the article by it diminishes the private credit. You’re actually redeeming the private credit from the Federal Reserve and putting it into public money form — non-negotiable Federal Reserve Notes. They still look like Federal Reserve Notes…
To summarize and paraphrase, the opening paragraphs of the article are a little misleading to say that the $1 billion in bond money is created out of thin air. It’s created, actually out of a suppositional wagering scheme or a tontine that everybody will be fooled into pledging themselves as national debt.
David Merrill
Statutory citations:
12 USC §391
Federal reserve banks as Government depositaries and fiscal agents.
The moneys held in the general fund of the Treasury, except the 5 per centum fund for the redemption of outstanding national-bank notes may, upon the direction of the Secretary of the Treasury, be deposited in Federal reserve banks, which banks, when required by the Secretary of the Treasury, shall act as fiscal agents of the United States; and the revenues of the Government or any part thereof may be deposited in such banks, and disbursements may be made by checks drawn against such deposits.
12 USC §411
Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.
31 USC §5103
United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts. [Notice that there is no reference to 'private' obligations]
31 USC §5115
(a) The Secretary of the Treasury may issue United States currency notes. The notes—
(1) are payable to bearer; and
(2) shall be in a form and in denominations of at least one dollar that the Secretary prescribes.
(b) The amount of United States currency notes outstanding and in circulation—
(1) may not be more than $300,000,000; and
(2) may not be held or used for a reserve.