Sunday, February 10, 2013
OBAMA RELEASE YOUR RECORDS
U.S. Supreme Court: Supplemental Brief Of Newly
Discovered Evidence Filed In Obama Eligibility Case
As reported here Dr. Orly Taitz filed a petition with the Supreme Court of the United States for the Obama eligibility case Noonan v Bowen. It was submitted to Chief Justice John Roberts on December 26th, 2012, and on January 9th, 2013, the petition was referred to the full court and distributed for conference scheduled for February 15, 2013. Below is the supplemental brief just filed:
EXCERPTS FROM FILED BRIEF: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE
Case at hand is scheduled to be heard on February 16, 2013 (15th) in a conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. (Note: See note at end of this post - explanation of what happens in this 'hearing' clearly misunderstood by most everyone.)
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought by Presidential Candidates Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S. President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S. Constitution Article 2, section 1, §5. The declaration of the candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud, on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security number 042-68-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt governmental officials. most notable example of criminal aiding and abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (official certificate of nomination of a candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions of the U.S. constitution” were removed in order to accommodate ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records, sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and experts showing that Barack Obama is:
1. A
citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Assisi
school in Jakarta Indonesia. As a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible
and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency.
2. Obama
is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with
the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,
deceased mother of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in herpassport. He was removed from her passport in August
of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by
the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed
in thepassport, is obtaining a foreign allegiance, it is believed that Barack
Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport when he
obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot not serve as a U.S.
president as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal
entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
3. Obama
does not have a valid U. S birth certificate. Plaintiff provided affidavits
from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph Arpaio, Investigator Zullo,
experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul Irey, showing that the image posted
by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a computer generated forgery. When
there is a question of authenticity of a document, the only way to
authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation of the original document.
Registrar of the State of Hawaii and Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General
of Hawaii in charge of the Health Department were
obstructing justice and absolutely refused to comply with any subpoenas and
produce the original 1961 birth certificate and as such there was never any
authentication of the alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction
of Justice, it is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and
genuine 1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply
does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid
Selective Service certificate. Based on the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and
investigator Zullo, alleged copy of Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is
COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY. In this supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing
additional evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the
Special investigations unit of the US Coast Guard(ret)
and former special agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under
the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged selective service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to 5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service. [...]
#4 IN CONCLUSION:
4. Justices Kagan and Sotomayor should recuse themselves from this consideration due to the fact that they are appointees of Barack Obama and if the court rules that he was not eligible for office, their very nomination becomes questionable, as such their opinion might be biased. [...]
FULL BRIEF W/EXHIBITS CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124806553
Affidavit: DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman; Obama Selective Service Registration Forged - DETAILS HERE.
Affidavit: Debt Collector Al Hendershot; Obama Using Harry Bounel's Social Security Number - DETAILS HERE.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit of the Chief Investigator of the special investigations of the US Coast Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to 5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register with the selective service. [...]
#4 IN CONCLUSION:
4. Justices Kagan and Sotomayor should recuse themselves from this consideration due to the fact that they are appointees of Barack Obama and if the court rules that he was not eligible for office, their very nomination becomes questionable, as such their opinion might be biased. [...]
FULL BRIEF W/EXHIBITS CONTINUED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124806553
Affidavit: DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman; Obama Selective Service Registration Forged - DETAILS HERE.
Affidavit: Debt Collector Al Hendershot; Obama Using Harry Bounel's Social Security Number - DETAILS HERE.
Noonan v Bowen(Obama) -
Supplemental Brief of Newly Discovered Evidence - U.S. Supreme Court - 2/8/2013by
ObamaRelease YourRecords
2006: Obama In Kenya: I Am So Proud To Come Back Home - VIDEO HERE.
2007: Michelle Obama Declares Obama Is Kenyan And America Is Mean - VIDEO HERE.
2008: Michelle Obama Declares Barack Obama's Home Country Is Kenya - VIDEO HERE.
FLASHBACK: Obama Is The Original Birther! Obama In 1991 Stated In His Own Bio He Was Born In Kenya. DETAILS HERE.
-ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Excerpts
from Jackson Pearson's comments: The court has a scheduled
meeting and discusses which, if any, cases will be heard and the rest are
neatly and arrogantly dismissed without comment. Unfortunately, the chance of
this case being heard is slim to none. The SCOTUS get about 10,000 appeals each
term and only hear 80 cases. That's it. Each justice is left open to
state or federal capital offence appeals, etc. There are about 9,920 appeals
that end up on the trash heap per term. Justice Clarence Thomas has
already stated that the courts are avoiding this issue.
SCOTUS
case briefs must be hand typed into an exact 9.25" X 6.5" bound
booklet format with no copied evidence allowed. Besides serving a brief
to everyone on the serving list, 40 booklets alone must be submitted each time
to the court and additionally with each requested supplemental submittal.
Except where briefs are now computer generated instead of pen and ink,
appeals are archaic, costs are high and the waste is incredibly horrendous.
