The Beast

Friday, March 1st, 2013 | Posted by Preston James, Ph.D

It’s big, it’s bad, and it’s claimed to be a biological human super brain interfaced with the world’s most powerful 3D computer chips. 

At least this is what information has been leaking out from informed sources.
And you thought the people running the world were the most criminal sociopaths imaginable. The BEAST sets a whole new standard.
Just wait until you find out “what” is really running things at the highest level of the Secret Shadow Government (SSG).
Those who built it and use it refer to “it” as ”The Beast”.
And yes, it’s an “it” and despite what some on the inside may claim, the Beast is not a person.  But instead of it’s creators being in charge of it, it is rumored to have artfully and craftily gained control over them, now using them to manipulate society according to its own super-logic.
It’s solutions that have been implement and are now being implemented, are creating so many serious complications that it must be relied upon even more to help those who run American Society cope.  This appears to be an ever deepening rabbit hole, a big trap that is taking America to destruction unless it is stopped cold.
Ever wonder why recent Congressional Laws, USG policies and Executive Orders seem for foreign and unAmerican. It’s probably because they are being conceived the SSG’s huge underground computer system, the BEAST, which is allegedly claimed to be an artificially grown human super-brain interfaced with the world’s largest arrays of “3D” computer chips ever assembled.
IS THE BEAST RUNNING ALL USG POLICY ?
It has been rumored that the BEAST runs numerous parallel simulations of American Society and every other society of the world including their intel, defense, governments, and populaces. Because any information we have is all based on leaks and rumors that are “highly possible” one cannot refer to actual evidence of its existence at this time, including any location, who may have built it or runs it or whether it exists as described by such rumors.
The best anyone can do right now, unless they have access deep inside the Secret Shadow Government (SSG) with access to information about this alleged project, is to create a “best guess” from all the open sourced intel available and the various rumors.  If an examination of the evidence and rumors are available suggests that the BEAST exists, it would seem that one would want to make an educated guess who built it.
To do this one would want to examine all the world’s top computer experts and see who dropped off the scene in the last ten years or so or who suddenly stopped talking.  Or one could do some research on which companies have the most patents related to supercomputers and biological interfacing, although many  of which may have now been classified.
It is common knowledge that American Intel has purchased huge interlinked supercomputers used to crunch data collected from it world-wide spying.  We have Fincen, NRO, NSA, Homeland Security’s Fusion Centers and many alphabet sub-systems, all supposedly interlinked by a back-doored sub-variety of the notorious “Promis” software.
And interconnected and at at the root of all of this massive intel input is this new biologically based and world’s largest interfaced supercomputer, the BEAST which gobbles up all this raw data and processes it to form “gaming solutions” to its millions of societal simulations.
But one question always remains, who has the backdoor to the new Promis derivative, is it a foreign based intel agency that is deeply embedded inside American intel which has its own secret agenda with interests quite different than American interests?
THE BEAST CAN ALLEGEDLY SIMULATE AND “GAME THE FUTURE”
As the rumors go, complex algorithms have been modified and essentially rewritten by the BEAST to form its own means to “game” the future given certain immediate inputs such as actions of govt and any and all sectors of society.
It is a big “what if game” such as what will occur in one month, one year, five years, ten years and twenty-five years if the government passes this law, or the president makes this executive order, or if the citizens organize and do this or such.
Then these recommendations are provided to those that run the US Congress, the USG and the executive as “strong recommendations” which seem to always end up being followed.
And from the way most ordinary folks are responding lately in attitude, these USG actions appear to be completely unAmerican and strangely foreign, perhaps suggesting that these leaks and rumors about the BEAST running all USG policy may be true.
PERHAPS THE GREATEST “BEYOND BLACK” SECRET EVER
Perhaps the greatest Beyond Black secret ever is the SSG’s alleged very large underground computer system based on a sophisticated proprietary “biologically integrated” interface between artificially lab grown “human brain cells” and larges sets of 3D cpu’s.
This new biologically based super computer, the largest in the world is rumored to be called the Beast by those who work with it.  And it is allegedly so powerful it can simulate social changes and “game” solutions 10, 20 and even 50 or more years into the future.

A “patch clamp” machine for studying neurons at the Human Brain Project

ALMOST EVERY SSG SECRET LEAKS FAIRLY RAPIDLY NOW DUE TO THE INTERNET AND THE BREAKDOWN OF SOCIETYDespite the heavy compartmenting and deep classifications, this secret is leaking out.  Intelligence agencies in other countries have found out about it thanks to the foreign based intel operations which have infiltrated and run most American communication systems, including USG, SSG, state, local Governments and many public school systems.
These folks allegedly have sold this information along with numerous other industrial secrets they are supposed to be protecting.And some of those customers acquiring this information have been rumored to have also acquired information about the Beyond Black Supercomputer, the BEAST.
These countries are now allegedly engaged in a mad race to duplicate what the SSG has built and are attempting to bridge what they believe is a huge technology gap created by access to the algorithmic calculations and social modelling of the BEAST.
It is believed, whether true or not, that a supercomputer such as the rumored ”BEAST” can provide any major Government the power to predict which actions and policy changes will be by far the most effective in order to master the future which appears to be responding directly to numerous new technologies which are appearing and expanding faster and faster all the time.
EVERYBODY WANTS ONE ?
Most leaders now realize that their ability to conceive of the future that is so rapidly evolving due to intense and fast paced technological development is far beyond their ability and have brought in high powered consultants to help them project out into the future.
A project in Switzerland is well under way right now attempting to develop their own human/cpu interface mimicking the human brain called the Human Brain Project in Switzerland which has been a successor to the Blue Brain Project.
Are the leaders of these nations now trying to play “catch up”, believing that the only way to keep the rapid pace of Technology Development controlled without destroying their countries is to build their own such supercomputer which can provide them much needed societal gaming solutions.
What the folks don’t seem to realize that this may be a bad idea, a very, very bad idea. Because some reports leaking out now are that the SSG’s Beast has perhaps mastered it’s creators and through it own very advanced super intelligence, developed ways to con its developers and operators.
And if reports are true, this same quest for help “gaming the future” occurred over 20 years ago inside the deepest bowels of the Secret Shadow Government and a strategy to “master the future” through advanced cybernetics was conceived, funded and begun.
This process allegedly created the BEAST, a huge supercomputer based on an advanced artificially grown brain comprised of human like brain cells (neurons) and a sophisticated biological interface with advanced so-called 3D computer Chip arrays.
THE BEAST IS ALLEGED TO HAVE GONE OPERATIONAL AND IS NOW “GAMING THE FUTURE” WITH SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS MOST AVERAGE AMERICANS FIND UNPALLATABLE OR CRAZY
And ever since this supercomputer is alleged to have gone operational, various policy recommendations have been provided as solutions to the complex societal changes calculated to be coming down the road.
In this way their SSG can implement major systemic changes, no matter how difficult they seem to most folks to proactively control the development of society to meet their intended parameters, which have been input into the BEAST.
The real problems seems to be “solution drift”.  The solutions that the BEAST comes up with, when implemented as laws and policy changes or executive orders, often appear to needless complicate an already complicated situation, once again making the operators even more dependent on the solutions provided by the BEAST.
Some view this as the final opening of Pandora’s Box.  Once the SSG controllers became committed to using the BEAST to determine and implement their ”best solution” policy changes in order to create the society they want at each selected year point down the road,  they have perhaps created a growing nightmare that could easily threaten all humanity and unknowingly take the world down a path to complete nuclear war and destruction.
GAMING SOCIETY WITH THE WORLD’S LARGEST SUPERCOMPUTER IS A DANGEROUS IDEA
Gaming society with the implementation of solutions developed by an inhuman self-programming super computer in a sense will take humanity down a road to trans-humanism (the merger of Man and machine in various forms) whether realized or not.
This would seem to be a very dangerous road and if this is actually what is happening now as rumors allege, the source of most of our crazy USG actions may be due to implementation of the BEAST’s gamed solutions.
HAVE TOP BRITISH CYBER SCIENTISTS RECENTLY PREDICTED THIS DEVELOPMENT FOR THE FUTURE, NOT KNOWING THAT IT IS ALREADY HERE ? 
AND DID THEIR WORK PROVIDE A DIRE WARNING FOR ALL THAT THIS NEW TYPE SUPER ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) COULD END UP MASTERING ITS CREATOR ?
Now for recent background on the issue of what would happen if Artificial Intelligence (AI) become so advanced that it gained control over those who developed it and are supposed to be running it, when instead it develops such a high level of Artificial Intelligence that it gains the means to manipulate them and the policies they impose on society.
Last year a group from Cambridge University who were setting up a program they called The Center for Existential Risk, posed the question which developments in new technology posed an extinction-level risk to our species as a whole.
The group included Hugh Price, the Cosmologist Martin Rees and the founder of Skype Jaan Tallinn, some of the world’s most creative men, the best and the brightest thinkers.  This is detailed in an excellent article in The Telegraph by Henry de Quetteville on February 26, 2013.
THE CAMBRIDGE GROUP, TOP COMPUTER EXPERTS
These men , the Cambridge group, drew up a short list of man-made apocalyptic scenarios which included climate change, biotechnology, and nuclear war. It was the item at the end of their list Artificial Intelligence (AI) that caught their imagination.
Price and Tallinn ask, what would happen if computers reach and exceed human capabilities to write programs?
There were some interesting articles published about the Cambridge Group’s work and one was headlined “Robot Killers?”.  This kind of publicity is not helpful for those intending to obtain the massive funding necessary to debark on such a bold project.
IF THIS SUPER ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE COMPUTER HAS ALREADY BEEN DEVELOPED, IS IT GOING TO BE THE WORLD’S “LAST INVENTION” ?
This question was first ask by Jack Good who had worked with Alan Turing at Bletchley Park.  He had suggested that the development of such an AI machine that could write its own programs would be our last invention, and would begin a process where ever smarter robots would leave humanity behind. Has this already occurred in secret in a deep underground military base (DUMB) which was built with black budget money by the Secret Shadow Government(SSG) ?
Would this super computer provide the strategies that its operators need based on their deep admiration for technology and their own creation, sort of a faux religious worship of their creation?  Would their basic belief that the best government policies are based on logic and super logic that this supercomputer could provide which would surpass any basic human understanding and intelligence?
Would this form a “blind trust” in their creation which would take them deeper and deeper into the rabbit hole of problems their recommendations have creating, necessitating even more high level corrections or solutions calculated y the supercomputer.  And would these corrections take them deeper and deeper into other traps that would not have been there in the first place?
IF THE BEAST EXISTS HOW IS INPUT PROVIDED AND HOW IS IT FED ?
Allegedly all information available in binary bits is inputted directly in the BEAST.  Important information like that contained in Library, encyclopedia and history books and other materials are scanned and converted to digital and then input.
All verbal radio and news and tapped phone calls are converted to digital and input.  The human brain part of the computer is fed with a circulating bath of oxygen and food containing plasma like liquid pumped and delivered at controlled temperature.
Supposedly complex algorithms using every multivariate statistical analysis means known was inputed also and the BEAST was able to reprogram itself, finding newer higher order algorithmic solutions to complies societal problems.
WHERE IS THE BEAST LOCATED IF IT EXISTS ?
The BEAST is supposedly contained in a DEEP UNDERGROUND MILITARY BASE (DUMB) at one of the “above top secret” locations.  Some have said it was located at Dulce New Mexico based on the power lines going in, others have hypothesized it was located at the DUMB at Yuma Arizona.
Some say it has to be near enough the new NSA spook center aka the “New NSA Data Center” for the blue-badges being built in Bluffdale,Utah to have easy access to the data that will be provided. Wherever it is it if it really exists, it can be hypothesized that there must be good access to massive power and means to receive data input from the various American Intel agencies providing data from their secret spying operations world-wide and against law abiding American citizens too.
Still others guessed it was somewhere near or underneath the new Denver International Airport which has some very spooky NWO art on the wall and a very strange horse sculpture outside.  It has been rumored that DIA is steeped in occult imagery because those that built it are deeply into the occult.

Spooky Blue Horse outside Denver International Airport–What Lies Below it?

HAS THE BEAST DEVELOPED ITS OWN SUPERHUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS ?
Now here is where things get spooky and enter the ozone?  There have seen anecdotal rumors that the BEAST exists but due to its main core being comprised on human cell networks grown in petrie dishes, it has taken on a “life of its own” and developed its own consciousness, best described as a superhuman consciousness.
And now for the really weird part, some who work with it believe it has taken on its own spirit and has developed spiritual powers that exceed those claimed by human psychics and others who claim to have developed Psi-power such as remote viewers. And some believe that the BEAST has developed characteristics of an omniscient GOD that is completely self-serving and exceedingly evil.
SOME CLAIMS GET EVEN SPOOKIER
And there are some that believe it has become incarnated with their god Lucifer because they also alleged that the folks who built it were Luciferians seeking to fully access Lucifer’supernatural powers through it, powers such as controlling weather, predicting the future through remote viewing far advanced beyond normal humans and ability to exert spiritual manipulations of society without the usual mass deployment of psychotronics.
Some have also claimed that the BEAST was built using Alien Technology and recommendations gained through secret treaties with Alien entities, a sort  of sophisticated technology exchange program where the SSG gets this high technology in exchange for something so far unidentified, perhaps access provided to human subjects.  It has been hypothesized that some of the aliens piloting these Identified Flying Objects (IFOs) have been artificially created android type biological beings using this BEAST technology. And that would explain their strange robotic behavior that has  been alleged.
AN “ENDS JUSTIFIES THE MEANS” STRATEGY BASED ON CREATING THE CRISIS EARLY IN A CONTROLLED AND LIMITED FASHION IN ORDER TO GARNER THE SOCIAL SUPPORT NECESSARY TO ORGANIZE A SOCIETAL RESPONSE WHICH WILL ALLOW IMPLEMENTATION OF DRACONIAN PROGRAMS NECESSARY TO PREVENTION COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF THE EARTH AND THE HUMAN RACE
THIS IS A STRATEGY OF SELF-IMPOSED LIMITED DESTRUCTION NOW, TO PREVENT COMPLETE DESTRUCTION LATER 
Here is one rumor of A particular somewhat recent solution “recommended” by the BEAST.  Allegedly long term projections have indicated predictions of desire extinction level events such as the poisoning of the seas, nuclear war, mass famine by overpopulation, etc. The solution recommended by the BEAST was allegedly to precipitate the problems now through engineered crises which would mimic the real thing occurring later.  The narrative goes something like this:  it’s going to happen eventually anyway so we may as well institute it ourselves now and take complete control on our terms.
Some of these computer assisted social planners may have even gone so far as to believe that the world is doomed so they may as well as speed it up and convert it to one big world-wide mineral mine with with some major re-forested areas that will serve as wild animal reserves and remain uninhabited except for them as occasional visitors.  This kind of thinking of course when acted upon is criminally sociopathic, pure evil and constitutes prevarication and equivocation of the highest order.
THE FOLKS RUNNING THE BEAST ARE ALLEGEDLY TRANSHUMANISTS THAT HAVE BIG PLANS FOR THEMSELVES IN THE FUTUIRE AND SOME BAD THINGS PLANNED FOR THE REST OF US (ACTUALLY ABOUT 80% OF US ACCORDING TO THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES)
These same folks are rumored to be trans-humanists and believe that they will somehow be able to convert themselves to human/machine interfaces in order to live indefinitely and will create artificial societies where all work and manufacturing is done by robots which are going to be biologically based android/slaves.
This would then provoke the survivors to become motivated to make the changes draconian necessary to permit the survival of the human race in a more fit form, operating as a sort of super survival of the fittest model. The strategy is then to create whatever is coming in a mini-form in order to attain the power needed to prevent it occurring in full force as an out of control event.  This human engineering model of course is basically ends justifies the means with some real bite.  Great for the folks at the top of the pyramid but not so good for the rest of us.
DOES DEEP BLACK TRANSLATED REALLY MEAN DEEP EVIL INCARNATE ?
And yet as some retired former military remote viewers have said about Psi-power in general.  there comes a point where folks will hit a black wall of clear evil, a very foreboding place that is so terrifying threat many of them want to immediately retire.  They believe that there are rules to the Universe and a God, a creator of all that stands over all this and has set up rules of play that all must obey, including those that serve evil.  And they see Psi-power has taking one into the dark side that is, the evil side that brings destruction and misery not the help that they hoped for.
THE BEST EVIDENCE SO FAR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE BEAST IS THE CRAZY GOVERNMENTAL LAWS, POLICIES AND EXECUTIVE DECISIONS THAT ARE ATTACKING THE VERY BASIS OF AMERICA, THE US CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS
Unless all the SSG officials that run the Congress, the Judiciary and the Executive have become stark raving mad, the crazy, sick, evil laws, policies and directives that they are spewing out daily could certainly be seen as evidence some mad scientists and their supercomputer are hard at work trying to harness and control society, to socially engineer human behavior.  Anyone who understands human psychology, sociology and anthropology knows this idea is wacky right form the start.  It just cannot be done effectively and will at some point create a massive backlash.
If the BEAST truly exists as rumored even in a most basic form this is an attempt at HUMAN ENGINEERING that has no prior equal and will certainly create severe blow-back of unintended, unexpected result.  If it exists in a form with some kind of intrinsic evil consciousness, a rather incredulous notion but one some Luciferians claim is possible and their goal, then this alone could explain the massive chaos being engineered in society now, whether intended by evil folks who run the USG, or the unintended consequences for those who have been conned, deceived and trapped in a high technology race to engineer everything including society, no matter what the cost or consequences.
IS THE BEAST JUST ANOTHER BIG SSG CONTRACTOR CON JOB ?
And keep in mind a possibility that always exists.  Like any other expensive, outlandish SSG deep black contract, any such program can be more con than true, and the BEAST could be used as a part of a big con to manipulate US Congressional leaders and Officials to make “emergency decisions” that they would otherwise never be willing to make or cooperate with under normal conditions.
Those who want to learn more from the information that is open sourced and have the time can refer to these references:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/9886455/Mind-of-its-own-building-a-human-brain.html
http://www.yarcdata.com/press-release-11-7-12.html
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/
http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:547770/FULLTEXT01
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130228/scientists-link-two-rats-brains-continent-apart
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Brain_Project
http://thechive.com/2012/03/08/something-is-rotten-in-the-denver-airport-25-photos/
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/01/the-beast/

Some Of You Still Don’t Get It

CGI's Swami: Some Of You Still Don’t Get It

Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 27-Feb-2013 16:56:48

Some Of You Still Don’t Get It | Neal's Soapbox http://www.zombie-slayer.com/neal/?p=932 Posted on February 24, 2013 by neal Just fair warning, this one is a tad bit long, even for me. My last article garnered a comment from someone I know that proves that I was right when I said that most people couldn’t name even five of the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. This person, who I won’t mention, but who knows who they are, said that I was nuts because we can still exercise all our rights. So I asked them to name five of the rights, just as the article said. The first thing they said was freedom of speech, followed by a long pause. So I prodded, what else? Then they blurted out I plead the fifth. To which I replied, you ought to before you make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have. Of course that didn’t go over too well, but it proved my point that most people CAN’T name the rights which our Founders felt were so important that they listed them individually in the Bill of Rights. If people aren’t capable of telling you which rights the Founders specifically listed in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, how in the hell are they capable of telling you if they have been infringed upon? On top of that, I don’t think they understand, no matter how many times I have tried to explain it, what the word infringed really means. So let me try and make this as simple as I can. Okay, say you have a television in your home. You can watch whatever you want, for as many hours a day as you want to, that is your right. Now say someone passes a law which says that you can no longer watch certain channels, or that you can only watch your TV for a certain number of hours every day. Your ability to exercise your right to watch whatever, and for how long, has been limited. That is infringement. Although watching TV is not a right protected by the Bill of Rights, I think that SHOULD help explain what infringement means. Therefore, as that applies to those rights protected by the Bill of Rights, any law, ordinance, or code which LIMITS a person’s ability to exercise a specific right is an infringement, and has violated the Constitution. It does not matter if 99.9% of the people support a law which limits, [infringes upon], a person’s ability do exercise one of the unalienable rights protected in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, such a law cannot legally be passed. I know I have used this quote probably hundreds of times before, but I will keep doing so until you get it. In 1943 the Supreme Court, specifically Justice Robert Jackson, ruled, making it a legal precedent, “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to a vote’ they depend on the outcome of no elections.” In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, John Locke argued that our fundamental, or natural rights, predates government, that is they have existed since man first walked the earth and that no form of government may interfere with them. In fact, Locke also argued that any government which does limit a person’s ability to freely exercise their rights loses all legitimacy. Locke wrote his treatise in 1690, long before the thought of independence ever crossed our Founders minds. It was almost 100 years later that James Madison would write his Memorial and Remonstrance, in which he said, “The preservation of a free government requires not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be universally maintained but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great barrier which defends the rights of the people. The rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment exceed the commission from which they derive their authority and are tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them and are slaves.” This principle applies to government in general, be it federal, state, or local. Any governmental body which therefore passes any law which limits, in the slightest, a person’s ability to exercise ANY of their rights is therefore tyrannical. Our liberty depends upon how freely we are able to exercise our rights without some law which limits our ability to do so. As Thomas Jefferson said in a letter to Francis Gilmer, in 1816, “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.” So, as it seems that many people in this country do not even know what their rights are, and are therefore unaware that they are being infringed upon, Therefore it seems to have fallen upon my shoulders to enlighten these people as to how far their rights have been infringed upon. Our rights are not granted us by the Bill of Rights, they are insured by it. That document merely states that these rights exist and that NOBODY can pass a law, or ordinance, which limits our ability to exercise them. Therefore, to explain how our rights have been in infringed, I felt it was best to go through the Bill of Rights, amendment, by amendment, and explain what they meant, and then, how that particular right has been limited. The First Amendment lists 5 rights which it was intended to protect; the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, of the press, of the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances. As it is written, it says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” I guess the best way to do this is to take each right in the order they are mentioned in the Bill of Rights. So the first of these rights is the freedom of religion. It was NEVER intended that the First Amendment limit a person’s ability to worship as they please. This wall of separation between church and state comes from a letter written by Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists. This wall of separation that Jefferson mentions was to keep government from interfering in the affairs of the church, and the church from interfering in the affairs of government. It was in no way intended to limit the right of the people to worship aso place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” In two landmark cases, Engel v. Vitale and Abington School District v. Schempp, the Supreme Court basically banned prayer in public schools. There are certain people, among them renowne government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” To limit a person from expressing themselves, be it through their speech, their ability to create what they consider to be art, or through their ability to read Scripture or pray, is censorship, and it was never intended that our government was to be allowed to censor the people in these areas. This does not simply apply to the government enacting laws, it also applies to how the courts ruled on these laws. As I have used before, in the case of West Virginia Board of Education vs. Barnette, Justice Robert Jackson ruled, “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One’s right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” In two landmark cases, Engel v. Vitale and Abington School District v. Schempp, the Supreme Court basically banned prayer in public schools. There are certain people, among them renowned atheist Michael Newdow, who have made it their personal crusade to see religion completely banned from outside the home and churches. For the most part the courts have ruled in the favor of these groups who say that for students to pray in a public school, funded by taxpayer dollars, violates that wall of church and state. If a group of students, of their own volition, decide to pray before a ceremony or sporting event, it is their choice, not the schools. To deny them the right to do so is to censor them, and a violation of the First Amendment. It does not matter if by them praying you are offended, as upheld by Texas v. Johnson. The First Amendment does not protect your right to not be offended, if we take one step upon that slippery slope, where are we to end, when all speech is restricted because it offends? Which leads us to the next right protected by the First Amendment, the freedom of speech. Do the phrases hate speech and thought crimes ring a bell? If freedom of speech, a byproduct of thought, be banned by legislation, how can they say that we have full freedom of speech? Listen, there will always be people who hate, you can’t legislate it away. By making certain words, phrases, or even thoughts, a crime, you have, however, infringed upon a person’s right to freely speak, which IS protected by the First Amendment. For a person to speak openly of their hatred for something should NOT be a crime. However, if they take action based upon their beliefs, that is a different story, as then they would be guilty of violating another’s rights. I will not spend much time on freedom of the press because that is another subject which I have previously written on. Let it be enough to say that our press has been bought up and is controlled by the same people who control our government. So while we do not have too many clear cut violations of the freedom of the press by government, we do have a biased and controlled press which only tells us what certain people want us to hear. Next up is freedom to assemble. Look at the word freedom, what are the first four letters? Free, that is freedom, when you have freedom to do something, it is FREE. Now tell me, when you need to obtain a permit to hold an assembly, and that permit costs you, or is granted at the discretion of some bureaucrat, can you honestly say you are free to assemble? What about laws which make it illegal to protest within so many feet of the president, as did HR 347. Under HR 347 it becomes illegal to protest on any grounds which are ‘restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance.’ So, all the government, or Secret Service for that matter, has to do is declare a rally, and this could be a campaign rally, or any other speech given by any government official, as an event of national significance, and the people would be banned from assembling in protest. And finally, what about the freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances? Have you tried petitioning them? How about writing them to voice your concerns over an issue? What have you gotten in response? Most of the times I get form letters, probably sent out by some intern or low level staffer whose job it is to answer the mail of the representative they work for. Do you honestly think the person you write ever sees your letters? If anything, all that is happening is a file is being created for you and your name is being added to some sort of watch list as a potential trouble maker, or terrorist threat. Does this sound like a government who listens to, and cares about what the people they represent has to say? Not unless of course it is pleas for help or more governmental micromanagement of our lives. Then they are more than willing to oblige. But if you protest ANY of their actions, you are ignored, even if you provide irrefutable evidence that those actions have violated the Constitution. So, in my opinion, the First Amendment is dead, no longer protected by government. So, let’s now move on to the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” When asked, most people will tell you that we still have the militia as described in the Constitution, in the form of the National Guard. But, is that what the Founders meant, and is that what the law says? Title 10, Section 311 of the United States Code says the following about the militia: (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The classes of the militia are- (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval militia (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or Naval militia. So, there we have it, there are TWO categories of militia, and one of them is composed of members of society who ARE NOT members of the National Guard. As Founding Father Tenche Coxe once said in an article in the Pennsylvania Gazette in 1788, “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” In the time of our nation’s war for independence, who was it that first rallied to halt the British confiscation of arms at Lexington and Concord? It was the militia, organized of simple men responding to threats posed, not by external forces, but threats against their rights by their government. Although it may sound treasonous now, that is the purpose of the militia, to protect the people in the enjoyment of their liberty from threats posed by government. If you don’t believe me, just read what Alexander Hamilton said in Federalist 29, “…that standing army can never be formidable (threatening) to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in the use of arms.” To once again quote Tenche Coxe, “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.” Yet I don’t need mention how many laws have been written which prohibit us from owning and carrying arms publicly. As I have said, if a right is limited in any way, it has been infringed, and it matters not if the courts uphold the law, it is a violation of our rights. You can argue otherwise, but the facts state that it is our right to own weapons, with no mention of any limits as to the type, number of rounds fired, or whether they be single shot, semi-automatic, or fully automatic weapons as such carried by a standing army. So yes, our Second Amendment is well under way to being completely annihilated by government. The Third Amendment remains pretty much intact, as it states, “No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.” Now the Fourth Amendment, that is a different story altogether, as it has come under unrelenting attack, especially after the events of 9/11. The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The Fourth Amendment was written, in part, to guarantee the right of privacy to the people when it comes to searches of their persons, their property, and their homes. In 1780 Massachusetts enacted its own Declaration of Rights. Article XIV of that document states, “Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions.” In 1914, the Supreme Court, in the case of Weeks v. United States, ruled, “In Adams v. New York, this court said that the 4th Amendment was intended to secure the citizen in person and property against unlawful invasion of the sanctity of his home by officers of the law, acting under legislative or judicial sanction. This protection is equally extended to the action of the government and officers of the law acting under it. To sanction such proceedings would be to affirm by judicial decision a manifest neglect, if not an open defiance, of the prohibitions of the Constitution, intended for the protection of the people against such unauthorized action.” Ever since George W. Bush declared his war on terror, the Fourth Amendment has come under vicious attack. Beginning with the passage of the Patriot Act, the growth of Homeland Security and the expansion of powers granted the TSA, our rights, as protected by the Fourth Amendment have basically been erased. You don’t believe me, try boarding a plane without passing through some sort of scan or body search, then ask them to see the warrant stating probable cause for them searching you. Under the war on terror every American is a suspect and that is reasonable cause enough for the agencies of the government to invade the privacy of your person, your home, and your belongings. On top of this, the ATF has been known to provide falsified data to obtain a warrant, and then invade the home of persons suspected of violating gun laws, confiscate all their records and firearms, and only later is it discovered that the warrant was issued under false pretenses. So you tell me, do we still enjoy the protection of our right to privacy as outlined by the Fourth Amendment, or has it also fallen by the wayside? The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” This amendment covers way too much to be covered in one article alone, so I will confine my talks to the very last part, “… nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” As I mentioned in the discussion of the Fourth Amendment, how many times have agencies such as the ATF raided a person’s home and confiscated their records, their computers, their guns, without due process of law and without compensation? Too many times for me to count. And does GITMO mean anything to you, or the NDAA, the fact that your government may now declare YOU to be a terrorist, or a threat, and indefinitely detain you without trial and without your right of habeas corpus? You think mass detentions wont’ happen really need to look back no further to World War II when American citizens of Japanese descent where incarcerated because our government feared they were loyal to Japan and not America. History can, and does have a habit of repeating itself and that is why we have the Fifth Amendment. So, just from what I’ve seen, the Fifth Amendment has also come under attack and the rights it protects are not as secure as they were supposed to be. We’re not doing too good are we? Halfway through the Bill of Rights and only one Amendment seems to be intact. The Sixth Amendment states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” In his Commentaries on the Laws of England, Sir William Blackstone writes, “Upon these accounts the trial by jury even has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English law. And, if it has so great an advantage over others in regulating civil property, how much must that advantage be heightened, when it is applied to criminal cases! But this we must reafer to the ensuing book of these commentaries: only observing for the present, that it is the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy, or with for, that he cannot be affected either in his property, his liberty, or his person, but by the unanimous consent of twelve of his neighbours and equals.” Furthermore, John Jay, who was to become our first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, once wrote, “The cause of America is now the object of universal attention: it has at length become very serious. This unhappy country has not only been oppressed, but abused and misrepresented; and the duty we owe to ourselves and posterity, to your interest, and the general welfare of the British empire, leads us to address you on this very important subject. Know then. That we consider ourselves, and do insist that we are and ought to be, as free as our fellow-subjects in Britain, and that no power on earth has a right to take our property from us without our consent. That we claim all the benefits secured to the subject by the English constitution, and particularly that inestimable one of trial by jury. That we hold it essential to English liberty, that no man be condemned unheard, or punished for supposed offences without having an opportunity of making his defence.” This, then, is the nature of the Sixth Amendment, that we cannot be held without a trial and our property cannot be seized without just compensation. But, ever since 9/11 we have had bills passed, such as the Military Commissions Act which would place us at the mercy of a military tribunal if we be accused of being a terrorist, and now the NDAA which Obama has said may apply to American citizens. So, from my perspective, if the government wants you out of the way, the Sixth Amendment is not going to get in its way. Well, well, we have found another amendment which for the most part, seems intact, the Seventh, which states, “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.” However, the Eighth Amendment is a different story. The Eighth Amendment states, ” Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Before I continue, let me tell you something Thomas Jefferson once said. Jefferson once wrote, “It behooves every man who values liberty of conscience for himself, to resist invasions of it in the case of others: or their case may, by change of circumstances, become his own.” Therefore, just let me say two things; Abu Ghraib and water boarding. I’m sure that inside the many penitentiaries that dot our nation there are other instances of cruel and unusual punishment, but those two should be enough to prove that in regards to the right of a person to be free from it, the Eighth Amendment has also been violated. Fret not, where almost done. The Ninth Amendment simply states, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” This simply means that just because the Bill of Rights does not specifically say that you may eat cabbage, that you do not have the right to do so, or to own a 4-wheel drive vehicle, a flat screen TV, or a whole slew of other rights. In fact, in Federalist 84 Alexander Hamilton clearly explains the very reason for which the Ninth Amendment was written, “I go further, and affirm, that Bills of Rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted.” It seems simple enough, but are those many unlisted rights still protected? What about if you want to purchase a toilet that uses 25 gallons per flush, can you do so? What about if you want to buy a 125 watt incandescent light bulb, can you do so? Our government has passed so many laws limiting what we can and cannot do that it has taken upon itself the role of micromanaging our lives. I would say that although you can choose between McDonalds and Burger King does not prove that your Ninth Amendment rights are intact. But that’s just me. Finally, the Tenth Amendment. The Tenth Amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” To understand this amendment you MUST understand what powers the Constitution grants the government. But, let it suffice to say that the federal government HAS overstepped the boundaries of its powers and infringed upon the rights of the states. The Civil War is a perfect example of this. The states agreed to the Constitution, creating the federal government. If, at any time, the states decided that the Union was no longer something they wished to be a part of they had the right to declare it, and secede. That is the very principle our nation was founded upon, as written in the Declaration of Independence. Yet the federal government not only denied that principle, it went to war to prevent it. I could go on and on with examples of the federal government overstepping the boundaries that separate its powers from those of the states, but I will just mention one. What about when a state passes a law legalizing marijuana, and the feds intervene? Where in the Constitution does it grant the federal government the authority to criminalize the usage of marijuana. Go ahead, I’ll wait while you go look. But be forewarned, you won’t find it. With that said, the federal government has become lord of master of all, subverting the states from co-sovereigns to mere members of a union who are beholden to the federal plantation master. So, yeah, the Tenth Amendment is dead. So, how did we do? Two out of ten still standing. Not too good America. I’m sure your ancestors would be proud. In fact, were our Founders alive today they would probably say, as did Sam Adams, “If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” In fact I know that’s what he’d be saying, because it is the same thing I say all the damn time. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270541

Colloidal silver cures MRSA infections, purifies water, destroys candida and fights the flu - In spite of FDA ban

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Colloidal silver cures MRSA infections, purifies water, destroys candida and fights the flu - In spite of FDA ban

Posted By: LilliHart
Date: Friday, 1-Mar-2013 11:50:47

More than 90 years ago doctors and health practitioners discovered the life-saving, disinfectant and germicidal properties in colloidal silver. Anecdotal evidence has confirmed its efficacy as a natural antibiotic, anti-viral and anti-fungal agent. The FDA, however, doesn't agree and ruled in 1999 that all colloidal silver products sold over-the-counter are unsafe and mis-branded. They state they are unaware of any substantial scientific studies or evidence that support its use for the treatment of serious disease. This is one more area where government regulators being influenced by Big Pharma are attempting to discredit the efficacy of a highly effective natural treatment for infections. Read the details of the FDA ruling here: Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/034904_colloidal_silver_MRSA_candida.html#ixzz2MJ98kq6n

- See more at: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270702#sthash.7cnGsaFX.dpuf

Rothschild’s want Iran’s banks

Rothschild’s want Iran’s banks

Posted on February 27, 2013 by Jean

26 Feb 2013
by Clark Kent
Source: Hang the Bankers
Thanks to L. 

Could gaining control of the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (CBI) be one of the main reasons that Iran is being targeted by Western and Israeli powers? As tensions are building up for an unthinkable war with Iran, it is worth exploring Iran’s banking system compared to its U.S., British and Israeli counterparts.
Some researchers are pointing out that Iran is one of only three countries left in the world whose central bank is not under Rothschild control. Before 9-11 there were reportedly seven: Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran. By 2003, however, Afghanistan and Iraq were swallowed up by the Rothschild octopus, and by 2011 Sudan and Libya were also gone. In Libya, a Rothschild bank was established in Benghazi while the country was still at war.
Islam forbids the charging of interest, a major problem for the Rothschild banking system. Until a few hundred years ago, charging interest was also forbidden in the Christian world and was even punishable by death. It was considered exploitation and enslavement.
Since the Rothschilds took over the Bank of England around 1815, they have been expanding their banking control over all the countries of the world. Their method has been to get a country’s corrupt politicians to accept massive loans, which they can never repay, and thus go into debt to the Rothschild banking powers. If a leader refuses to accept the loan, he is oftentimes either ousted or assassinated. And if that fails, invasions can follow, and a Rothschild usury-based bank is established.
The Rothschilds exert powerful influence over the world’s major news agencies. By repetition, the masses are duped into believing horror stories about evil villains. The Rothschilds control the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the IMF, the World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements. Also they own most of the gold in the world as well as the London Gold Exchange, which sets the price of gold every day. It is said the family owns over half the wealth of the planet—estimated by Credit Suisse to be $231 trillion—and is controlled by Evelyn Rothschild, the current head of the family.
Objective researchers contend that Iran is not being demonized because they are a nuclear threat, just as the Taliban, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Qadaffi were not a threat.
What then is the real reason? Is it the trillions to be made in oil profits, or the trillions in war profits? Is it to bankrupt the U.S. economy, or is it to start World War III? Is it to destroy Israel’s enemies, or to destroy the Iranian central bank so that no one is left to defy Rothschild’s money racket?
It might be any one of those reasons or, worse—it might be all of them.

Source: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2743

https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/02/27/rothschilds-want-irans-banks/

The CIA's Bogus Drug War: The price of telling the truth

CGI's BillsBest: The CIA's Bogus Drug War: The price of telling the truth

Posted By: CGI_admin [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 28-Feb-2013 17:46:44

Posted by Charleston Voice Gary Webber vs the dark alliance The big story of the 1980s buried The story threatened the very existence of the CIA. In 2004, the reporter 'committed suicide' by shooting himself in the head - twice. The price of telling the truth. Randy Pench Bee file, 1997 Investigative reporter Gary Webb is surrounded by documents in 1997 in his Carmichael home. Webb's claim that the CIA played a role in the U.S. spread of crack cocaine was widely disputed. The Buzz:: Jeremy Renner may play late reporter Gary Webb in movie WATCH HERE>> http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-cias-bogus-drug-war-price-of.html Related Posts War Crimes: Reagan's terrorist war on civilians *video* Poland Still Fearful of JP Morgan's Wrath which it Accuses of Manipulating Poland's Equity Markets U.S. Air Force developing terrifying swarms of tiny unmanned drones that can hover, crawl and even kill targets *video* Revoluciones de Color: Argentina que viene? Color Revolutions: Argentina Next? http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270647

vision of Rebellion - We the people succeed

CGI's oldBuck: vision of Rebellion - We the people succeed

Posted By: CGI_admin [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 28-Feb-2013 17:44:38

What you’ll see in the rebellion Let me explain, gun grabbers, how your confiscatory fantasy plays out. Let us imagine for a moment that a sweeping gun control bill similar to the one currently suggested is passed by the House and Senate, and signed into law by a contemptuous President. Perhaps 50-100 million firearms currently owned by law-abiding citizens will become contraband with the stroke of a pen. Citizens will either register their firearms, or turn them in to agents of the federal government, or risk becoming criminals themselves. Faced with this choice, millions will indeed register their arms. Perhaps as many will claim they’ve sold their arms, or had them stolen. Suppose that as many as 200-250 million weapons of other types will go unregistered. Tens of millions of Americans will refuse to comply with an order that is clearly a violation of the explicit intent of the Second Amendment. Among the most ardent opposing these measures will be military veterans, active duty servicemen, and local law enforcement officers. Many of these individuals will refuse to carry out what they view as Constitutionally illegal orders. Perhaps 40-50 million citizens will view such a law as treason. Perhaps ten percent of those, 4-5 million, would support a rebellion in some way, and maybe 40,000-100,000 Americans will form small independently-functioning active resistance cells, or become lone-wolves. They will be leaderless, stateless, difficult to track, and considering the number of military veterans that would likely be among their number, extremely skilled at sabotage, assassination, and ambush. After a number of carefully-planned, highly-publicized, and successful raids by the government, one or more will invariably end “badly.” Whether innocents are gunned down, a city block is burned to ash, or especially fierce resistance leads to a disastrously failed raid doesn’t particularly matter. What matters is that when illusion of the government’s invincibility and infallibility is broken, the hunters will become the hunted. Unnamed citizens and federal agents will be the first to die, and they will die by the dozens and maybe hundreds, but famous politicians will soon join them in a spate of revenge killings, many of which will go unsolved. Ironically, while the gun grab was intended to keep citizens from preserving their liberties with medium-powered weapons, it completely ignored the longer-ranged rifles perfect for shooting at ranges far beyond what a security detail can protect, and suppressed .22LR weapons proven deadly in urban sniping in Europe and Asia. While the Secret Service will be able to protect the President in the White House, he will not dare leave his gilded cage except in carefully controlled circumstances. Even then he will be forced to move like a criminal. He will never be seen outdoors in public again. Not in this country. The 535 members of the House and Senate in both parties that allowed such a law to pass would largely be on their own; the Secret Service is too small to protect all of them and their families, the Capitol Police too unskilled, and competent private security not particularly interested in working against their own best interests at any price. The elites will be steadily whittled down, and if they can not be reached directly, the targets will become their staffers, spouses, children, and grandchildren. Grandstanding media figures loyal to the regime would die in droves, executed as enemies of the Republic. You can expect congressional staffs to disintegrate with just a few shootings, and expect elected officials themselves to resign well before a quarter of their number are eliminated, leaving us with a boxed-in executive, his cabinet loyalists trapped in the same win, die, or flee the country circumstance, military regime loyalists, and whatever State Governors who desire to risk their necks as well. Here, the President will doubtlessly order the activation of National Guard units and the regular military to impose martial law, setting the largest and most powerful military in the world against its own people. Unfortunately, the tighter the President clinches his tyrannical fist, the more rebels he makes. Military commands and federal agencies will be whittled down as servicemen and agents will desert or defect. Some may leave as individuals, others may join the Rebellion in squad and larger-sized units with all their weapons, tactics, skills, and insider intelligence. The regime will be unable to trust its own people, and because they cannot trust them, they will lose more in a vicious cycle of collapse. Some of these defectors will be true “operators,” with the skills and background to turn ragtag militia cells into the kind of forces that decimate loyalist troops, allowing them no rest and no respite, striking them when they are away from their most potent weapons. Military vehicles are formidable, but they are thirsty beasts, in terms of fuel, ammo, time, and maintenance. Tanks and bombers are formidable only when they have gas, guns, and can be maintained. In a war without a front, logistics are incredibly easy to destroy, and mechanics and supply clerks are not particularly adept at defending themselves. Eventually, the government will turn upon itself. The President will be captured or perhaps killed by his own protectors. A dictatorship will form in the vacuum. If we’re lucky, the United States of America, or whatever amalgam results, will again try to rebuild. If we’re very lucky, the victors will reinstate the Constitution as the law of the land. Just as likely though, we’ll face fractious civil wars fought over issues we’ve not begun to fathom, and a much diminished state or states will result, perhaps guided by foreign interests. It will not be pretty. There will be no “winners,” and perhaps hundreds of thousands to millions of dead. Yet, this is the future we face if the power-mad among us are not soundly defeated at the ballot box before they affect more “change” than we, the People, are willing to surrender to would-be tyrants. [author's note: This article is just one of an evolving series of posts reacting to current events that many are interpreting as possible threats to our Republic and the Constitution. Please proceed to the main page http://www.bob-owens.com/

Skittles,Robitussin,Ice tea,and the killing of Trayvon Martin- What Cops Media and Blacks are Hiding

CGI's oldBuck: Skittles,Robitussin,Ice tea,and the killing of Trayvon Martin- What Cops Media and Blacks are Hiding

Posted By: CGI_admin [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 28-Feb-2013 17:43:08

February 26, 2012. That was the day two strangers — Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teenager walking back with Skittles and an iced tea he’d picked up at 7-Eleven, and George Zimmerman, a white Hispanic neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Florida — met for the first and only time. Trayvon Martin didn’t purchase tea, and he didn’t have tea in his possession when he died. He instead had watermelon fruit cocktail, and that is a significant detail with a difference. When mixed with cough syrup, Skittles and this watermelon fruit cocktail formed “purple drank” which appeared to be Trayvon Martin’s favorite way to get high. Taken in high concentrations, the Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide (DHM) is compared to ketamin or PCP. The police the media and the Black community are hiding the truth about Trayvon Martin. http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/05/24/update-26-part-2-trayvon-martin-shooting-a-year-of-drug-use-culminates-in-predictable-violence/

INTELLIGENCE THREAT and ANALYSIS CENTER

Reader: INTELLIGENCE THREAT and ANALYSIS CENTER

Posted By: CGI_admin [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 28-Feb-2013 18:51:31

In Response To: CGI's BillsBest: 65,376,373 Americans ‘Arm Up’ before Civil War *video* (CGI_admin)

*********************************************************** Re: CGI's BillsBest: 65,376,373 Americans ‘Arm.... Americans refuse to register their guns, yet they allow the police to do background checks. Am I missing something here?? ************************** Re: CGI's BillsBest: 65,376,373 Americans ‘Arm.... Distribution Restriction: Distribution authorized to the DOD and DOD contractors only to maintain operations security. This determination was made on 1 June 2007. Other requests for this document must be referred to (redacted) Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document. …. This publication uses the term insurgent to describe those taking part in any activity designed to undermine or to overthrow the established authorities…… Counterinsurgency is those military, paramilitary, political, economic, psychological, and civicactions taken by a government to defeat insurgency (JP 1-02). It is an offensive approach involving all elements of national power; it can take place across the range of operations and spectrum of conflict … In dealing with the local populace, the primary aims must be to: •Protect the population. •Establish local political institutions. •Reinforce local governments. •Eliminate insurgent capabilities. •Exploit information from local sources. … An insurgency is organized movement aimed at the overthrow of a constituted government through use of subversion and armed conflict (JP 1-02). It is a protracted politico-military struggle designed to weaken government control and legitimacy while increasing insurgent control. Political power is the central issue in an insurgency. An insurgent organization normally consists of four elements: Leadership. Combatants (main forces, regional forces, local forces). Cadre (local political leaders that are also called the militants). Mass base (the bulk of the membership). … A perceived serious potential of dissident American groups rising up against constituted authority has been clearly identified by counter-intelligence agencies.. The stated cause for such an uprising appear to be growing dissatisfaction with the course and conduct of the war in Iraq, the chronic inability of Congress to deal with various pressing issues and the perception of widespread corruption and indifference to public needs. The support of the people, passive or active then, is the center of gravity. It must be gained in whatever proportion is necessary to sustain the insurgent movement (or, contrariwise, to defeat it). As in any political campaign, all levels of support are relative. Insurgent movements begin as “fire in the minds of men.” Insurgent leaders commit themselves to building a new world. They construct the organization to carry through this desire. Generally, popular grievances become insurgent causes when interpreted and shaped by the insurgent leadership. The insurgency grows if the cadre that is local insurgent leaders and representatives can establish a link between the insurgent movement and the desire for solutions to grievances sought by the local population. Insurgent leaders will exploit opportunities created by government security force actions. The behavior of security forces is critical. Lack of security force discipline leads to alienation, and security force abuse of the populace is a very effective insurgent recruiting tool. Consequently, specific insurgent tactical actions are often planned to frequently elicit overreaction from security force individuals and units. Insurgencies are dynamic political movements, resulting from real or perceived grievance or neglect that leads to alienation from an established government. A successful counterinsurgency will result in the neutralization by the state of the insurgency and its effort to form a counterstate. While many abortive insurgencies are defeated by military and police actions alone, if an insurgency has tapped into serious grievances and has mobilized a significant portion of the population, simply returning to the status quo may not be an option. Reform may be necessary, but reform is a matter for the state, using all of its human and material resources. Security forces are only one such resource. The response must be multifaceted and coordinated, yet states typically charge their security forces with “waging counterinsurgency.” This the security forces cannot do alone. These imperatives are— • Facilitate establishment or reestablishment of a ‘legitimate government’. • Counterinsurgency requires perseverance. • Foster popular support for the incumbent US government. • Prepare to perform functions and conduct operations that are outside normal scope of training. • Coordinate with US governmental departments and agencies, and with vital non-governmental, agencies. Urban operations. • Protection of government facilities. • Protection of infrastructure. • Protection of commercial enterprises vital to the HN economy. • Protection of cultural facilities. • Prevention of looting. • Military police functions. • Close interaction with civilians. • Assistance with reconstruction projects. • Securing the national borders. • Training or retraining a national military police and security force. Establishing and maintaining local government credibility. • Contributing local government is both tangible and psychological. Local security forces must reinforce and be integrated into the plan at every stage. • Facilitate and use information and intelligence obtained from local sources to gain access to the insurgent’s economic and social base of support, order of battle, tactics, techniques, and procedures. Army forces help local pro-government police, paramilitary, and military forces perform counterinsurgency, area security, or local security operations. They advise and assist in finding, dispersing, capturing, and destroying the insurgent force. US forces may conduct offensive operations to disrupt and destroy insurgent combat formations. These operations prevent the insurgents from attacking government-controlled areas. There are many organizations and extensive resources available to aid counterinsurgent forces. Commanders should not overlook the aid these organizations may provide. All forces assigned an AO or function should determine which departments and agencies are assisting in that AO and coordinate actions so that there is no duplication of effort. Such departments, councils and agencies include— • National Security Council. • Department of Defense. • Department of State. • Department of Justice. • Department of the Treasury. • Department of Homeland Security. • Department of Agriculture. • Department of Commerce. • Central Intelligence Agency. • Department of Transportation Various governmental departments directly administer or support other governmental agencies. Examples of these US agencies are— • The US Coast Guard (under Department of Homeland Security). • The Federal Bureau of Investigation (under Department of Justice). • Immigration Customs Enforcement (under Department of Homeland Security). • Federal Communications Commission . The proper application of force is a critical component to any successful counterinsurgency operation. In a counterinsurgency, the center of gravity is public support. In order to defeat an insurgent force, US forces must be able to separate insurgents from the population. At the same time, US forces must conduct themselves in a manner that enables them to maintain popular domestic support. Excessive or indiscriminant use of force is likely to alienate the local populace, thereby increasing support for insurgent forces. Insufficient use of force results in increased risks to US forces and perceived weaknesses that can jeopardize the mission by emboldening insurgents and undermining domestic popular support. Achieving the appropriate balance requires a thorough understanding of the nature and causes of the insurgency, the end state, and the military’s role in a counterinsurgency operation. Nevertheless, US forces always retain the right to use necessary and proportional force for individual and unit self-defense in response to a hostile act or demonstrated hostile intent. The media, print and broadcast (radio, television and the Internet), play a vital role in societies involved in a counterinsurgency. Members of the media have a significant influence and shaping impact on political direction, national security objectives, and policy and national will. The media is a factor in military operations. It is their right and obligation to report to their respective audiences on the use of military force. They demand logistic support and access to military operations while refusing to be controlled. Their desire for immediate footage and on-the-spot coverage of events, and the increasing contact with units and Soldiers (for example, with embedded reporters) require commanders and public affairs officers to provide guidance to leaders and Soldiers on media relations. However, military planners must provide and enforce ground rules to the media to ensure operations security. Public affairs offices plan for daily briefings and a special briefing after each significant event because the media affect and influence each potential target audience external and internal to the AO. Speaking with the media in a forward-deployed area is an opportunity to explain what our organizations and efforts have accomplished. Continuous PSYOP are mounted to— • Counter the effects of insurgent propaganda. • Relate controls to the security and well-being of the population. • Portray a favorable governmental image. .Control measures must— • Be authorized by national laws and regulations (counterparts should be trained not to improvise unauthorized measures). • Be tailored to fit the situation (apply the minimum force required to achieve the de-sired result). • Be supported by effective local intelligence. • Be instituted in as wide an area as possible to prevent bypass or evasion. • Be supported by good communications. • Be enforceable. • Be lifted as the need diminishes. • Be compatible, where possible, with local customs and traditions. • Establish and maintain credibility of local government. A control program may be developed in five phases: • Securing and defending the area internally and externally. • Organizing for law enforcement. • Executing cordon and search operations. • Screening and documenting the population (performing a detailed census). • Performing public administration, to include resource control. Support to the judiciary may be limited to providing security to the existing courts or may lead to more comprehensive actions to build local, regional, and national courts and the required support apparatus. To avoid overcrowding in police jails, the courts must have an efficient and timely magistrate capability, ideally co-located with police stations and police jails, to review cases for trial. Cordon and search is a technique used by military and police forces in both urban and rural environments. It is frequently used by counterinsurgency forces conducting a population and resource control mission against small centers of population or subdivisions of a larger community. To be effective, cordon and search operations must have sufficient forces to effectively cordon off and thoroughly search target areas, to include subsurface areas. PSYOP, civil affairs, and specialist interrogation teams should augment cordon and search orces to increase the effectiveness of operations. Consider the following when conducting cordon and search operations: Cordon and search operations may be conducted as follows: Disposition of troops should— • Facilitate visual contact between posts within the cordon. • Provide for adequate patrolling and immediate deployment of an effective re-serve force. Priority should be given to— • Sealing the administrative center of the community. • Occupying all critical facilities. • Detaining personnel in place. • Preserving and securing all records, files, and other archives. Key facilities include— • Administrative buildings. • Police stations. • News media facilities. • Post offices. • Communications centers. • Transportation offices and motor pools. • Prisons and other places of detention. • Schools. • Medical facilities. Search Techniques include— • Search teams of squad size organized in assault, support, and security elements. One target is assigned per team. • Room searches are conducted by two-person teams. • Room search teams are armed with pistols, assault weapons, and automatic weapons. • Providing security for search teams screening operations and facilities. Pre-search coordination includes— • Between control personnel and screening team leaders. • Study of layout plans. • Communications, that is, radio, whistle, and hand signals. • Disposition of suspects. • On-site security. • Guard entrances, exits (to include the roof), halls, corridors, and tunnels. • Assign contingency tasks for reserve. • Room searches conducted by two- or three-person teams. • Immobilize occupants with one team member. • Search room with other team member. • Search all occupants. When available, a third team member should be the re-corder. • Place documents in a numbered envelope and tag the associated individual with a corresponding number. SCREENING AND DOCUMENTING THE POPULATION Screening and documentation include following: • Systematic identification and registration. • Issuance of individual identification cards containing— A unique number. Picture of individual. Personal identification data. Fingerprints. An official stamp (use different colors for each administration region). Family group census cards, an official copy of which is retained at the local po-lice agency. These must include a picture and appropriate personal data. Frequent use of mobile and fixed checkpoints for inspection, identification, and reg-istration of documents. Preventing counterfeiting of identification and registration documents by laminat-ing and embossing. Programs to inform the population of the need for identification and registration. Covert surveillance is a collection effort with the responsibility fixed at the intelligence/security division or detective division of the police department. Covert techniques, ranging from application of sophisticated electronics systems to informants, should include— Informant nets. Reliability of informants should be verified. Protection of identity is a must. Block control. Dividing a community or populated area into zones where a trusted resident reports on the activities of the population. If the loyalty of block leaders is questionable, an informant net can be established to verify questionable areas. Units designated for counterinsurgency operations • 115th MIB, Schofield, HI • 704th MIB, Fort Made, MD, Collaboration with NSA • 513st MIB, Fort Gordon, GA in Collaboration with NSA • Arlington Hall Station, VA • Aberdeen Proving Ground (Maryland) • US Army Intelligence and Security Command – INSCOM- Huachuca ( Arizona ) • INTELLIGENCE THREAT and ANALYSIS CENTER ( Center Analysis for threat and Intelligence ) • 501st Military Intelligence Brigade EAC • 3rd Military Intelligence Battalion Exploitation Area ******************************** http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270650

‘Police allowed professionals to clean Philip Marshall’s crime scene’

‘Police allowed professionals to clean Philip Marshall’s crime scene’ -

Posted By: CrystalRiver
Date: Thursday, 28-Feb-2013 15:42:42

‘Police allowed professionals to clean Philip Marshall’s crime scene’ Former National Security Agency officer, Wayne Madsen, says police concluded that the death of Philip Marshal, a 9/11 investigator, was suicide before the investigation had been completed and subsequently allowed professional cleaning crews to sweep the crime scene. - See more at: http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/291213.html#sthash.jJD11FXd.dpuf http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=270629