"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 42

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 42
The Public Execution of John F. Kennedy
by Sherman H. Skolnick 11/17/03

Testing A Coup

Supposing there was a sizeable military unit. And they threatened violence in the main city of the Republic. They demanded that the President and the
Circulating for many years in the alternative media underground have been the notes of what some contend were the true perpetrators of the political assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Some of these reports had titles such as "The Gemstone Files", and "The Torbett Document", and were copied and re-copied, and shared as background by various political assassination researchers. These details were often discussed when such researchers got together at meetings.
According to some alternative commentators, these notes were to be read and considered in conjunction with the book "Farewell America". Published in Europe about 1968, and circulated in about fourteen languages, the book was no t permitted by U.S. postal and customs authorities to be imported into the U.S. to be sold in bookstores. This censorship in the U.S. ended about 2002, when amazon.com began selling a paperback edition of the book now listed on their webs ite. Until 1973, I was only one of two researchers in the U.S. who found a way to get "Farewell America", in English, in hardback, into the U.S. At nationwide college seminars by me, I gave them away to students in return for small donations to support our work.
Here are matters necessary to understanding the political wipe-out of JFK
Starting in 1841 and continuing until the first year of the 20th Century, were the visible results of violent struggles between the Vatican/the Jesuits and the Protestant Church in America as well as the efforts of Great Britain t o take-back the American continent, reverting the inhabitants to being mere subjects, not U.S. citizens, of the British Monarchy and returning this land to being puppet colonies of the Crown.
In furtherance of these ends, five U.S. presidents were assassinated for the benefit of Great Britain and the Vatican/the Jesuits.
===William Henry Harrison, killed by being poisoned, in 1841, a month after being inaugurated as President. U.S. Senator Thomas Benton in his book stated as to President Harrison, "that the deceased President had been closely preceded and was rapidly followed by the deaths of almost all of his numerous family, sons and daughters." Only one of President Harrison's eight children, a son, was permitted to live. "Thirty Years' View From 1820-1850" by Thomas Benton.
===Zachary Taylor, like Harrison, killed by being poisoned 1850, during the slavery controversy, called the Compromise, instigated by Great Britain to divide up and conquer the United States. These efforts by England eventually led to the American Civil War, also called The War Between the States, in which England financed and outfitted with weapons the Jefferson Davis Confederacy, breaking away from the United States of America.
===Abraham Lincoln,, assassinated, as a symbol, on Good Friday, April, 1865, a few days after the South surrendered. Part of the plot against Lincoln included the guard at the door of Lincoln's box at Ford's Theater. The guard fled to the Vatican and was sheltered as part of the Vatican Guard. The Vatican, through various strategies, including making their presence and power known to a U.S. jury, effectively kept the guard from being convicted and jailed for being part of the plot against Lincoln,upon the guard returning to the U.S.
===James Abram Garfield, murdered 1881. He was against England interfering with the industrial development and finance of the U.S.
===William McKinley. Prior to his first term as President, he promoted U.S. industrial and financial interests in opposition to Great Britain by the McKinley Tariff. In his first Presidential term, he promoted U.S. imperialism, in the U.S. war against Spain, in opposition to England. Like Garfield, he was opposed to Great Britain interfering with U.S. industrial and financial development. He was assassinated in 1901, a few months after being inaugurated President for the second time.
===John F. Kennedy. The 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified January 16, 1919 and repealed by the 21st Amendment, December 5, 1933. It prohibited the manufacturing, sale, and importation of intoxicating liquor within th e U.S., and exportation of the same from the U.S. The period was called "The Prohibition".
John F. Kennedy's father, Joseph P. Kennedy, during Prohibition, made the British royalty beholden to him for financial benefits. The Brits controlled the manufacturing and export of booze from England and Scotland. Joe Kennedy arrange d to smuggle into the U.S. the British royal products through a transit point, being a small French island in the mouth of the St. Lawrence Seaway.
Old man Kennedy distributed the spirits in the U.S., in violation of Prohibition, mainly through his financial arrangements with gangsters, in Boston, Chicago, and Detroit and the massive bribery of state and federal U.S. officials. &n bsp;The British royals, for their financial gain, tolerated Joe Kennedy, despite the fact they considered him a lower level being, as an Irish Catholic. In the 1930s, as a reward, despite Joe being a Catholic, he was made U.S. Ambassador to England.
Joe Kennedy made the Rockefellers as well, beholden to the Kennedy Family. The Second World War started September 1, 1939. Three weeks into the war, England arranged a secret supposed "peace-time" arrangement between Rockefeller's Stan dard Oil of New Jersey with the German chemical and synthetic rubber cartel, I.G. Farben. With the corrupt aid of Ambassador Kennedy, the deal was fraudulently back-dated as if arranged prior to the start of the war. The Rockefellers treasonously shared profits with I.G. Farben, through supposed South American neutral countries, all during the war. See "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin.
Joe Kennedy, in October, 1940, gave up being Ambassador and returned to the U.S. Being heavily anti-Jewish and pro-Hitler (similar to the British royals who were actually German royals from the House of Hanover), Kennedy tried to persu ade President Franklin D. Roosevelt for the U.S. to stay neutral, since Kennedy was convinced Hitler would win the war against England. After delivering U.S. weapons to Britain, U.S. ships sometimes returned, not empty to U.S., but with loads of liquor from the British Royals spirits industry headed for Joe Kennedy's firm, Somerset Imports, Ltd., even during World War Two.
What happened to Joe Kennedy's son John F., was similar to the supposedly fiction book "Winter Kills" by Richard Condon who was also author of the political murder thriller "The Manchurian Candidate". "Winter Kills" is about an Irish p atriarch, thick with hoodllums, who through them, arranges to get his son elected President. And then the gangsters join with others to assist the assassination of his son. (For a while, the movie version of the book was blocked from presentation in the U.S. At a limited showing at the Art Institute theater in Chicago, I taped an interview with the movie producer, how the Kennedy Family went about destroying him.)
Joseph P. Kennedy's booze firm was Somerset Imports, Ltd., with offices in Chicago. I taped an interview with the company manager who told how the ownership changed hands exactly at the time of the murder of President Kennedy. Despite that, he said, the Kennedy Family continued post-assassination to get financial benefits from five out of eight British/Scotch booze labels distributed in the U.S. We also interviewed a key salesmen from the firm.
John F. Kennedy in an extremely close election against Presidential candidate Richard M. Nixon, won the Electoral College vote and hence the presidency, by Chicago gangsters stealing some eight thousand votes used to have JFK carry Ill inois' necessary electoral vote.
Shortly after being inaugurated in 1961, President Kennedy proceeded with the plan, started by President Eisenhower, to invade Cuba at the "Bay of Pigs". In so doing, JFK, nominally a Catholic, violated Catholic Church canon law and do ctrine, by proceeding to make war against another Catholic country, namely Cuba, and its leader, Fidel Castro, a Jesuit. The invasion plan became a fiasco when JFK refused to have U.S. war planes aid the invaders on the beach.
Joseph P. Kennedy had a financial interest in toppling Fidel. Through a bank he owned in Boston, the elder Kennedy owned North Cuba Railroad Bonds, made worthless by Fidel but having value if he was removed.
Catholics in the American CIA considered John F. Kennedy a traitor and a butcher. Three weeks before the Dallas murder, President Kennedy ordered a coup against the devout Catholic South Viet Nam government in Saigon. Murdered on Kenne dy's authorization for geopolitical reasons, was the South Viet Nam premier, Ngo Dinh Diem, and his two brothers. The premier's widow, Madame Ngu, taking up residence in Paris, supervised the American CIA's assassination of JFK, using French assass ins previously part of a failed plot by disgruntled French Generals against French Premier DeGaulle. (The French military was sore at DeGaulle for not defending French interests in Algeria.)
Madame Ngu was in charge of huge dope funds from the "Golden Triangle" of Southeast Asia. In later years, participating in the financial benefits was the unholy trio of George Herbert Walker Bush, Colin Powell, and Powell's sidekick, R ichard Armitage. The American CIA arranged for General Powell to avoid being prosecuted for war crimes in his role in the vast murders of Vietnamese women and children known as the My Lai Affair.
To harass the Lyndon B. Johnson administration, Madame Ngu used part of the illicit funds to finance the American CIA's agents provocateurs posing as supposed leaders of the anti-Viet Nam War Movement, 1966 and thereafter. A fake peace-nik leader, Rennie Davis, had his father as consultant in the later war-mongering Nixon White House. Because I early on with my associates investigated Rennie and the Madame Ngu links to the peace fakers, I was numerous times falsely arrested or threatened with arrest.
Every U.S. president following the murder of JFK, either assisted the assassins in some way, or participated in covering up the CIA/Nazi War Criminal murder of Dallas witnesses, or kept incriminating U.S. records from being revealed.
===LYNDON B. JOHNSON, just prior to the JFK assassination, told his mistress, who later wrote about it, that "after tomorrow that bastard Kennedy will not be able to embarass me anymore". Johnson's war industry cronies stood to make billions from the Viet Nam War that JFK opposed spreading out. Johnson abandoned JFK 's order to issue Two Dollar genuine U.S. Paper money, NOT phony-baloney Federal Reserve notes masquerading as the "U.S. Dollar". (More on this later.) Johnson using the fraudulent Gulf of Tonkin Affair to justify enlarging the Viet Nam struggle, pandered to the Aristocracy financially benefitting, as they do, from Wars and Depressions, to the great detriment of the American commonfolk.
Johnson appointed the Warren Commission to whitewash the high-level murder of JFK.
===RICHARD M. NIXON. According to writings by the highly-skilled assassination researcher, Penn Jones, Jr., and others, there was a meeting in Texas, just prior to the assassination, of U.S. Generals together with FBI dictator J. Edgar Hoover, Richard M. Nixon, and others, plotting out all the details. Living in the Dallas suburb of Midlothian, Jones found out plenty and wrote about it.
After leaving office as Vice President, Nixon, as little-known, headed-up and supervised, for the American CIA, the plan to invade Cuba in 1961, at the "Bay of Pigs". Later, as President, Nixon kept blackmailing the Aristocracy on the high-level plot to murder JFK, the details of which Nixon knew. The CIA, through the instigated Watergate Affair, forced Tricky Dick from the Presidency in 1974.
By the way, the CIA through their Foundation fronts, sponsored the 1968 commotions in Chicago at the Democrat Convention, discrediting the Democrats and enabling Nixon to win the election as President on the GOP ticket.
Nixon's false statement, which ended up in the Warren Report, was that he left Dallas on the morning of the murder. He was there as General Counsel for the Pepsico Bottlers Convention. Years later, a Pepsico director who was on a Dallas radio program with me, confirmed from his own direct knowledge, that Nixon was there all that day. In fact, said the director, Nixon outraged others at the Convention by demanding that the Convention proceed even after JFK was killed just after h igh noon. Nixon stayed at a hotel next to a suite occupied by movie star Joan Crawford whose husband, heading up Pepsico, was apparently conveniently wiped out.
===GERALD FORD. Becoming President through the Rockefeller-instigated 25th Amendment, without an election, following the resignation of Nixon, Ford was in a perfect position for the JFK murder cover-up. Ford in 1964, had been a member of the infamous Warren Commission, falsely proclaiming a "lone assassin" killed JFK. Ford was a spy, for J.Edgar Hoover, on the Warren whitewash, and acted along with staff faker Arlen Specter to promote the ridiculous single-bullet theory. Specte r was later rewarded by the American CIA which purchased for him the position of U.S. Senator (R., Pa.)
As part of a scheme to stop Nixon, after resigning, from continuing to blackmail the CIA and others, Ford, without much formality, pardoned Nixon from any federal criminal prosecutions.
===JIMMY CARTER. Selected for the Presidency by the Rockefellers and the infamous Council on Foreign Relations (members of which flooded the Carter Administration), Carter was, like the other Presidents following the murder, a perfect choice. During the 1976 Presidential Election, a doctor with apparent direct data, claimed Jimmy Carter was actually an illegitimate off-spring of Joseph P. Kennedy, "Founding Father" of the Kennedy clan. Seldom-noted, the Kennedys remain silent about t he high-level plots that snuffed out JFK, the attempt in 1964 by a sabotaged plane crash to wipe out Teddy Kennedy, and the murder of Bobby Kennedy in 1968 as he was possibly on the way to occupying the Oval Office. The Kennedys, with the possible excep tion of JFK daughter Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, are reputed blackmailers. Unable to do anything about the high-level plots against the Kennedy Family, they get great financial benefits from their blackmailing the Aristocracy.
[More about the Kennedys, in our website series, "What Happened to America's Goldenboy", the murder of JFK, Jr.)
===RONALD REAGAN. For many years prior to being California Governor and U.S. President, Reagan was a stooge for General Electric and their propaganda series on network television, the "General Electric Theater". G.E. helped finan ce the rise of Adolf Hitler and their facilities in war-time Germany, Second World War, were NOT bombed. [See Antony Sutton's documented book "Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler".] Hence, Reagan was as well entangled with the Bush Family and their pro-H itler past. [See "The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush" by Webster Griffin Tarpley et al., 1992.]
In the late 1960s, New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison conducted criminal prosecutions of those involved in the Louisiana aspect of the JFK murder plot. Reagan, as California Governor, blocked the Garrison investigation by refus ing to extradict a key witness from within the California jurisdiction.
In 1981, a few weeks after being inaugurated as President, Reagan was violently reminded to keep his mouth shut. He was hit in the chest by some kind of a projectile while coming out of the entrance of a hotel in the District of Columb ia. Although some network TV reporters, as eyewitnesses, said there were multiple shots fired from several directions, the monopoly press blamed it all on John Hinckley, a member of the American Nazi Party, and whose father was in the oil business with George Herbert Walker Bush who as Vice President, itched to take over the Oval Office.
===GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH. The elder Bush, as shown by an FBI document, was part of the witness cover-up of the JFK murder. He was entangled with those who were part of the high-level plot against JFK. Bush played a role in supervi sing, with Nixon, the aborted invasion of Cuba, 1961, for which the head of the CIA, Allen Dulles, called JFK "a traitor". No stranger to Nazis and Nazi war criminals then living in the U.S., Bush was implicated with the Nazis in the U.S. used to snuff out JFK murder eyewitnesses. [See the voluminous writings of the highly-skilled late assassination researcher Mae Brussell.]
===WILLIAM ROCKEFELLER CLINTON. The person using the name "Bill Clinton" is actually the illegitimate great grandson of old John D. Rockefeller, founder of the infamous monopoly Standard Oil. On our website, in various articles, we tel l why we feel justified in using Rockefeller as Bill's middle name.
From an early age, Bill Clinton was recruited for doing agent provocateur acts for the American CIA. He was most of the time under the supervision of the London Station Chief of the U.S. spy agency. Falsely posing as a draft-dodger (de spite the statements of the monopoly press, he was NOT but rather a cover story as CIA spy), Bill in the late 1960s traveled in Europe, while compiling reports for the CIA on the anti-Viet Nam War Movement in Europe. He helped keep track of Madame Ngu, widow of premier Diem in Saigon along with Diem's two brothers, ordered assassinated by JFK. She was stationed in Paris and headed up the CIA acts resulting in the murder of JFK and the killing thereafter of eyewitnesses.
Starting in 1970 and thereafter, at various seminars, I commented, to no avail, that JFK ordering the wipe-out about November 1, 1963, of the Diem brothers running the Saigon government, was instrumentally involved in two events. First , the aborted plot in Chicago, two and a half weeks before Dallas, to murder JFK at a football game. He cancelled his visit. All the details became part of a federal court lawsuit by me against the National Archives and Records Service. I attached eleve n documents to my lawsuit, April, 1970, apparently stolen from the government records repository. A judge previously CIA Counter-Intelligence Chief in Europe, put my lawsuit out of court without legal formality. Assassination researchers, spending all t heir book-authoring and lecture efforts as to which way the bullets went in Dallas, all the years ignored my lawsuit and often condemned me for not joining with them as to the Dallas aspect.
Secondly, Madame Ngu headed up the American CIA murder of JFK. More than thirty-three years after my revelations about this, a few details related to this came out in a book published November, 2003. "Triangle of Death The Shocking Truth About the Role of South Vietnam and the French Mafia in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy", by Bradley S. Leary and L.E. Seymour, World Net Daily Books.
A member of the Warren Commission, Congressman Hale Boggs (D., La.), in later years had misgivings about the "lone assassin" finding of the Commission. He began publicly grumbling about this and about the FBI Dictator J. Edgar Hoover s pying on Congress by wire-tapping. In October, 1972, a month before Nixon was re-elected President, Boggs was to take a private plane on a planned trip to Alaska. Guess who, as a young man, drove him to the airport? Why, none other than Bill Clinton!
Boggs' plane disappeared in Alaska. The CIA and Military Intelligence falsely claimed the plane was never found. Boggs' daughter, Cokie Robert (nee Boggs), knowingly made false statements that her father's plane was never found and, th at her father believed a "lone assassin", Lee Harvey Oswald, killed JFK. She was rewarded by getting a multi-million dollar per year position on Sunday morning programs on ABC-TV network.
Our interviews with private investigators as to the Boggs' Alaska event, convinces us the plane was found and the matter covered up. This was a month BEFORE Nixon's re-election. A month AFTER Nixon's re-election was the murder of Dorothy Hunt, wife of the Watergate burglar, E. Howard Hunt, and eleven other Watergators through a sabotaged plane crash in Chicago, December, 1972. [See my four part website series, "The Secret History of Airplane Sabotage".]
===GEORGE W. BUSH. Like his father, he has been part of the JFK murder cover-up. Bill Clinton, as Arkansas Governor, participated in the CIA weapons/dope smuggling through the Southern States, including through the tiny airport at Mena , Arkansas. Clinton co-operated in these illicit activities with Daddy Bush and Ollie North. Clinton, from time to time, visited at the Bush Family mansion in Kennebunkport. Maine and Bill is part of the Bush/Clinton Crime Family. [See the book, "B oy Clinton", by Tyrell, page 2.]
George W. Bush, like his father, surrounds himself with those with purported Nazi links, including Karl Rove. And Bush met quietly with Arnold Schwarenegger two years before Arnold became recall Governor of California. Arnold's immedia te family in Austria were Nazi officials under Hitler. Remember, as pointed out by the late master assassination researcher, Mae Brussell, the Nazi criminals quietly residing in the U.S., post-World War Two, were involved with their criminal specialty, murdering witnesses, in particular those who knew too much directly about the Dallas details.
The actual duly elected President in 2000 BUT NOT INAUGURATED, namely Albert Gore, Jr., to his credit as U.S. Senator and thereafter, told others in Congress he was in favor of getting to the bottom of who all was involved in the JFK m urder.
In sum, John F. Kennedy was the subject of a public execution, November 22, 1963, having his brains blown out in an open car in Dallas.
The motives for the Aristocracy arranging the political assassination of JFK, justifying at least to themselves why the murder was necessary for THEM to survive running the United States of America, WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
1] Kennedy angered the oil tycoons headquartered in Texas where he was executed. He announced he favored scrapping the tax loophole enriching them, namely the oil depletion allowance. The once-banned book, "Farewell America", has a wh ole section on this subject.
[2] Kennedy antagonized the Aristocracy and their ownership of the PRIVATE central bank, pretending to be part of the U.S. Government, namely the Federal Reserve. A month before the wipe-out, JFK invoked a little-known provision of federal law, authorizing him to issue genuine U.S. currency paper money in the form of Two Dollar Bills. To counter this over the years, the spy-riddled, oil-soaked monopoly press made jokes about the Two Dollar Bill. JFK did not live to see his auth orization of the genuine U.S. paper money issuance to be carried out, the same having been nullified by President Johnson.
As ruled by the U.S. Court of Appeals, for the Ninth Circuit, headquartered in San Francisco, and not challenged or disputed, "The regional Federal Reserve banks are not government agencies....but are independent privately owned and lo cally controlled corporations." Lewis vs. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Circuit, 1982). [Can be referred to in a law library, the reference to be read as Volume 680, Federal Reporter 2nd series, starting at page 1239.]
[3] Kennedy angered the Aristocracy by threatening to wind down the Viet Nam struggle, depriving the Ultra Rich of war profiteering benefits.
[4] On the other hand, Catholics in the Aristocracy justified his execution on the basis he committed, even nominally as a Catholic, violations of Church canon law and doctrines. Namely, proceeding to attack a Catholic nation and leade r, Cuba, with Fidel Castro, a Jesuit. And ordering the assassination of the Diem brothers, in a coup, for geopolitical reasons, against the devout Catholic Saigon government.
[5] The most important motive for his public execution By his charming ways and speechs, he gave the impression to the American commonfolk that the era of the common man had arrived, a dangerous mindset that had to be quickly end ed for the Aristocracy to survive. This psychological trend was ended when JFK's brains were blown out, as a warning to would-be charming leaders who departed from the orders and rules of the Ultra Rich.
For additional and supporting details as to the foregoing, consult the book listing of one of the leading assassination book specialists The Last Hurrah Bookshop, 937 Memorial Ave., Williamsport, PA 17701 (570) 321-1150 (phone and fax ). http//hometown.aol.com/jfkhurrah For example, as to books about Lyndon B. Johnson being part of the plot, on their website, click on TEXAS/JOHNSON.
More coming. Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar42.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 41

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 41
by Sherman H. Skolnick 10/29/03

Sometimes certain events of a mystery are right under the noses of the monopoly press. Either because they are lazy, or their bosses will not let them write what they find, or whatever---parts of the strange happenings remain unexplained, sometimes for years and years.
A network reporter whispered into our ear, pressed to the ground. Not an unusual happening for us. If they find out something that is censored, and they cannot go with it, because of the higher-ups---well, they know where the independent loudmouths reside. And sometimes for various esoteric reasons, they owe us some favor. (Such as by digging up "dirt", we got their boss off their back.)
Before you consider some of the details, you have to consider the following:
[A] Some of what is contained hereafter as to certain persons in the World Trade Center may remain unexplained and not completely correct. So as to give those referred to the benefits of all doubts, that they may, in fact, be innocent of complicity in 9-11.
[B] BUT, possibly true and for the first time revealed, are the details that happened right under the view of the oil-soaked, spy-riddled American monopoly press.
BACKGROUND:
1. Various details analyzed and compiled by others, strongly support the view that the World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York City, on September 11, 2001, did not suddenly collapse shortly after something---an actual airplane, or a missile disguised with a hologram projection to simulate an airplane somehow hitting the Towers and each entire plane getting somehow swallowed up inside the buildings.
Yet, aviation and engineering experts seriously doubt that a huge airplane, wings and tail, could penetrate the buildings hitting heavy reinforced pillars and such. Some question: how come the huge wings and tail, from vibration and impact, did not fall off to the ground below? How come Fire Department experts, on their walkie-talkies, stated that they got high up in one of the buildings; that the fire they saw was not that bad; and that other firemen should bring up hoses because the fire could easily be brought under control. Yet, shortly after making such a report, the buildings got pulverized and collapsed all the way down.
2. The youngest son of George Herbert Walker Bush, namely Marvin Bush, is seldom mentioned in the monopoly press. Yet, there are detailed articles available in search engines [such as <http://www.google.com/>www.google.com MARVIN BUSH ] that Marvin was the director of a casualty insurance company with coverage of the World Trade Center, and that the coverage was stopped sometime before 9-11. Also Marvin Bush was a director of a firm that was involved with the security of the World Trade Center.
[For more details, review the known stories about FBI Deputy Director, John P. O'Neill, an expert on counter-terrorism, who about August, 2001, quit the Bureau because the Bush White House blocked him from further investigating Osama bin Laden. Why? Clearly, because O'Neill's probe would lead to the Bush Crime Family, the Carlyle Group, and related banks and entities tied to Osama. O'Neill became the head of Security at the World Trade Center, and about his first day of work was 9-11. He was outside one of the buildings but was somehow lured inside where he perished, CONVENIENTLY.]
3. Notice this strange series of events. A group of purported German and Austrian artists apparently smuggled their way into the World Trade Center. THEY LIVED FOR SOME TIME ON THE 91st FLOOR of one of the twin towers.
[What may or may not be relevant: the U.S. authorities tried their best to torpedo a criminal action in Germany, following 9-11, as to purported Moslem "terrorists" being implicated or in some way blameable for the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. Yet, the head of the U.S. FBI and other top U.S. officials refused to show up to testify as requested. The apparent reason? German counter-intelligence was apparently pursuing an angle troubling to the U.S. Namely, that certain Saudis, living for a while prior to 9-11 in Germany, were part of a high-level U.S. government diversion to what really happened on September 11, 2001. That is, that Osama and his cohorts were NOT actually involved. And because of the data uncovered by German authorities, the supposed Moslem "terrorists" were merely on what is known in espionage, as a "parallel track", a trick to disguise the real events and make them like Lee Harvey Oswald, a patsy, falsely blamed.]
The German and Austrian purported artists were working on a book while living on the 91st floor of one of the Twin Towers, in an area that had been a warehouse, where they built a balcony.
"In short, the book belies the extravagance of the feat it seems to document: the covert installation, and brief use of a balcony on the 91st floor of the World Trade Center, 1,100 feet above the earth. Eight photographs---some grainy, all taken from a great distance--depict one tower's vast eastern facade, marred by a tiny molelike growth; a lone figure dressed in a white jacket, standing on a lectern-size box."
"Balcony Scene (Or Unseen) Atop the World; Episode at Trade Center Assumes Mythic Qualities", by Shaila K. Dewan, Metropolitan Desk, New York Times, Saturday, August 18, 2001 (1645 words to story).
More from the same article:
"Still, how did a balcony escape the notice of one of the most security-conscious office towers in the world? An examination of the security system revealed that it was focused on the ground floor and basement. Mr. Janka [one of the "artists"] said, adding, "There's no surveillance on the facade itself".
And more from the lengthy article:
"Yet, since the Sunday morning in March 2000, when the balcony was allegedly installed, and, 19 minutes later, dismantled, the affair has taken on the outlines of an urban myth, mutated by rumors and denials among the downtown cognoscenti."
Yet, more:
The four purported artists, "...the four, wearing harnesses, unscrewed the aluminum moldings that hold the window in place and used two large suction cups to remove the glass (air pressure adds about 300 pounds to the effort). As warm air streamed past, they outfitted the window with a cantilevered box, big enough for only one person at a time."
The World Trade Center security apparently at first denied to the New York Times and others that there was anyone living inside one of the Twin Towers on the 91st Floor.
4. So, questions remain:
===were the purported "artists", escaping notice of the WTC security and living on the 91st floor, a diversion for certain persons who wired up the towers for internal explosions, to concide with something striking the towers on 9-11? Did they know, or see anything, while living inside one of the towers, by which they could be witnesses to foul play? The "artists" may deny the whole thing as merely a "prank". And vigorously deny any complicity in any dirty business to bring down the towers. Until more facts are elicited, we must consider the possibility that they may be entirely innocent. To prove they lived in the building, the artists produced a bill proving a helicopter, paid for by them, was used to photograph their occupancy of the 91st floor, photos made from the outside through a window.
===the firm that got the contract to clear up the debris after the collapse of the towers was Controlled Demolition, Inc. Is it a mere coincidence that they are the same one specializing in taking down old hotels and such, by internal explosives causing such buildings to fall down on themselves. The firm was involved with what some contend was a cover up in the rapid way in which the FBI wanted to remove all evidence of what brought down the Federal Office Building, April 19, 1995, by multiple explosions in Oklahoma City. The building was quickly smashed down and the site covered up with cement, courtesy of the FBI and apparently with the demolition firm.
We are making every effort to attach a copy of the New York Times article to this story.

More coming. Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar41.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 40

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 40
by Sherman H. Skolnick 9/29/03

Sensible Americans take it as a given. That the oil-soaked, spy-riddled American monopoly press simply cannot tell us the truth. About Iraq, about the murder of President Kennedy, and a lot of other issues. The mouthpieces of "the powers that be", the Ruling Class---in short THEM---are shackled to the Establishment's outrageous if not cruel BIG LIE agenda.
Confronting the U.S. Supreme Court and one step below it, the Chicago Federal Appeals Court, is a Motion detailing Fraud Upon Those Courts perpetrated by the Judges themselves. These facts revolve around a mammoth fraud involving Coca-Cola Company, the American CIA, and the Courts, overlapping onto the litigation of the high court called Bush versus Gore. That is, the Five-Judge, Military-Style Junta in Washington, that under a malign and corrupt influence, arbitrarily installed George W. Bush as the occupant and resident of the White House. The duly elected President, Albert Gore, Jr., was simply not INAUGURATED.
[Visit "Coca-Cola, the CIA, and the Courts", Part 9, on various websites, such as archived on
More details necessary to be understood:
[1] As detailed in the Motion, cocaine is a by-product of the processing, within the U.S., of huge amounts of coca leaves for the production of the secret base of Coca-Cola. Reportedly tied into the "leakage" of cocaine, within the U.S., into non-legal channels are top-level U.S. judges and members of the Bush Crime Family. Plainly, some of the cocaine snorted in the U.S., even by Judges themselves, is NOT smuggled in from somewhere else, outside the U.S., such as Columbia.
[2] Those in law enforcement contend that tied to the Coca-Cola, CIA, Courts, cocaine mess, is Vicente Fox, President of Mexico. He headed Coca-Cola of Mexico and had a dominating, if not having even now a continuing role, as to Coca-Cola in most of Latin America, south of the United States.
Fox is implicated, say those in a position to know, in the BIG FIX in Bush versus Gore litigation in the high court. And in various ways, he is tied to those judges in the Coca-Cola litigation, acting under a mlaign if not corrupt influence. Judges obligated by law to divulge their financial relationship to Fox, Coca-Cola, and such, but do NOT show the same on their mandatory annual judicial financial disclosure forms required to be signed by the judges subject to the penalties of perjury..
3] Mexico President Fox has, on and off the record, made serious demands for concessions, favoring Mexico, from the George W. Bush White House. Some legal scholars assert that some of those arm-twistings border on being, if not actually, unlawful and unconstitutional. That illegal Mexicans in the U.S. be permitted to prevail on U.S. authorities with documents, issued within the U.S., by Mexican officials officed in the U.S. That such otherwise undocumented persons be issued state drivers licenses. That they collect U.S. Social Security, Medicare, and other U.S. and state benefits, the same as U.S. citizens.
[4] Beyond that, Fox is demanding of the Bush White House guarantees as to Mexico and Fox, that Mexico have certain rights as to southern California, New Mexico, Arizona, and parts of Texas. Not identical---would they blatantly dare?---but similar to those areas being somehow returned or annexed to Mexico, nullifying and reversing the results of past wars between the U.S. and Mexico, which would be unconstitutional and beyond the Bush White House authority.
[5] As a horrendous blackmail and diversion, Fox and company are threatening to steer up a big Texas secret, just to trouble Americans who may oppose the demands of Fox/Mexico. Texas was the only territory that entered the Union with provisions. Texas, through their State Legislature, has been granted the proviso, that they can, if they so wish, divide Texas into five separate states, each with Two U.S. Senators to sit in the U.S. Senate. The power to do so has for generations been quietly carried over, from session to session of the Texas State Assembly. It is a legal political nuclear bomb that can be triggered off, at any time, or more openly referred to, by way of strong-arming certain positions.
[6] Another big whisper, fearful to the newsfakers, is about how those sneaking over the border into the U.S. have been used for America's Imperialistic designs. A sizeable number coming across the deserts and the Rio Grande, have been grabbed, sent to U.S. Military boot camp, and make up part of the U.S. forces in Iraq. They do not speak English and are difficult to supervise. When these "grunts" are killed in fire-fights and such with Iraqis and others who oppose U.S. as foreign invaders, or die from accidents or illness in Iraq; their bodies are NOT returned to the U.S., or, for that matter, to Mexico. These "U.S. Troops" are buried in mass graves in Iraq, and no count kept or officially revealed as to how many perished.
A documentary maker, apparently uncovering the mass graves of "U.S. troops" and this terrible secret, was ordered reportedly to be murdered by U.S. Special Forces or similar teams, and explained away as an "accident".
FOX, and company, IF HE RUNS HIS BIG MOUTH, CAN CERTAINLY TROUBLE BUSH ABOUT THE "GREEN CARD SOLDIERS".
[7] If there is a Presidential Election in 2004 in the usual way, George W. Bush may have a problem. Remember, in advance of the 2000 Presidential Election, I stated on numerous radio talk shows and on-line, that the then upcoming Election may not be conducted in the expected, usual way, if at all. The same may true as to 2004.
Can Bush call up enough Reserves to fulfill the Aristocracy's requirements as to safeguarding the oilfields in Iraq? If not, would Bush dare order a Draft of Men and Women, to send them as Military to Iraq?
An alternative would be a secret pact with Fox and company, to arange more, great numbers of U.S. "Green Card Soldiers". That is, dragoon sizeable numbers of young Mexicans and other Latin Americans, coming across the border, and hustle them into the U.S. Military, and then, swiftly off to Iraq as "throwaway soldiers", expendables, not to be noted, counted, nor their dead bodies returned to the U.S/Mexico. Or, if wounded, shipped where?
Obvious to most, is that pulling out all U.S. Military from Iraq, and returning them to the U.S. in possible dishonor, most likely would destroy the Bush White House and Overthrow the American Republic.
[8] I have described George W. Bush as an incompetent who pisses on his own shoes, to put it crudely. Would Bush dare rattle the chains of Fox as corruptly linked to the looming scandal of the bribery of some of the Judges on the highest tribunal in the nation, jointly overlapping the corruption of the Judges of the Chicago Federal Appeals Court? All swirling around the malign, corrupt influence in the litigation known as Bush versus Gore?
Bush may thus knock down Fox and his demands. BUT, then further revealed would be the corrupt way Bush was installed by the malign influence on the Five-Judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.
It would be an understatement to say Vicente Fox merely sleeps with the corrupt Judges, Chicago and Washington, outlined in the court-filed Motion. Fox seems plainly to be implicated with the Fraud Upon those courts perpetrated by the Judges themselves along with their co-conspirators.
Fox and Bush are together in a box. For them, there is no way out. Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar40.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 39

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 39
by Sherman H. Skolnick 9/25/03

Finger-pointers are dealt with in many ways. Some are simply written off as imagining official bureaus are corrupt. Their protests are blocked as having no basis. Or, that they are paranoid, and require medical if not psychiatric attention. Or, that they are just malcontents, and should be ignored.
If a real reformer shows up, they are sent away with empty promises of correction. If judges are identified as corrupt and bribe-takers, the would-be crusader is barred from the courthouse as a "security risk". If that does not end the agitation for redress of grievances---well, the judges could certainly reach into their cauldron of powers and pull up, from the mists and vapors of antiquity, invoking thus the judge-created offense of "contempt of court". That would certainly preclude the tribunal from having to hear "trouble-makers".
If demands for government reform or improvement persist, the "powers that be", the Establishment, the Ruling Class---in short THEM---could concoct a frame-up. After all, a few per cent of those in prison are innocent but actually political prisoners. Others there may just need hospital attention.
A group of researchers and investigators assisted in the details of a proceeding to bring out Fraud Upon the Courts, perpetrated by the Judges themselves upon their own Court. Among others implicated are judges on the U.S. Supreme Court and one-step below them, all the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, headquartered in Chicago. Some acted under a malign, if not corrupt, influence in respect to blockading mammoth claims against a major firm, Coca-Cola Company. There are many details. Such as apparent "leakage" into non-legal channels within the U.S. of cocaine, a by-product of the processing of coca leaves to make the secret base for Coca-Cola. So you thought all the clandestine cocaine was smuggled in from Columbia and such? Such as, implicated is George Herbert Walker Bush. Such as, an overlap of corrupting the Five-Judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, in the Bush versus Gore litigation, arbitrarily installing George W. Bush as the occupant and resident of the White House.
Step by step details are in my website story with the actual court papers attached (and voluminous court-filed Exhibits to be posted later) Coca-Cola, the CIA, and the Courts, Part 9, 9/22/3.
Perhaps the Judges cannot straight forward answer the charges of Fraud Upon the Court perpetrated by the Judges themselves on their own court. So now the reformers are facing an apparent frame-up. The Bush Justice Department reportedly is set to claim that the court clean-up group committed federal criminal offenses by procuring an elite team of assassins physically endangering two judges on the U.S. Supreme Court, part of the 5-Judge majority that installed the younger Bush in the Oval Office. Is it just a coincidence that these are the same two high court Justices identified as corrupted in the demand for the investigation of Fraud Upon the U.S. Supreme Court?
And, that those who seek to publicly condemn the depraved jurists as corrupt, are also accused of supervising a band of ruffians. Doing what? Why, harassing "liars and whores of the press", that is, shoving around newsfakers who cover up for the Bush Crime Family. Does this include Washington Post hotshot Bob Woodward, whose late father was a highly corrupt Chicago-area Chief Judge? Little-known, that Du Page County Chief Judge Alfred Woodward, in an unpublicized case, arbitrarily awarded millions and millions of dollars from an insurance fraud case to Nixon White House Watergate Figures (the little-mentioned Equity Funding case of the 1970s---we have the files to prove it. And more, Chief Judge Woodward, like his son Bob, was a key figure in the espionage Establishment).
And who is accused, apparently by the Bush Justice Department, of financing these "domestic terrorists"? Why, Albert Gore, Jr., considered by some, if not many, as the duly elected President NOT INAUGURATED. Planned reportedly by the federal prosecutors is to rely on the Patriots Act, which has cancelled many of the guarantees of the Bill of Rights.
Additional Bush Justice Department federal criminal charges reportedly contend that aiding and abetting this "interference" with American high-level judges and media honchos, is a Canadian broadcaster who on a major show, known as a "blow torch" radio facility(maximum power station), broadcast from Toronto and also carried ON-LINE, supposedly foments related sedition directed against the current U.S. regime.
Will the whistle-blowers be dealt with in a Kangaroo Court. And then, sent away to an American Gulag?

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar39.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 38

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 38
by Sherman H. Skolnick 8/11/03

There are examples throughout history of the making of Empires and the breaking up of the same.
How did a small group of islands take over sizeable land and treasure all over the world? Simple. The British are the leading experts on studying the ways of other peoples and other places. They have for centuries figured out the schemes to grab what they want by turning groups against one another. India and China are examples. South Africa another case to consider.
As discussed in this website series, the British have vowed to take back the land called America, reverting the inhabitants to being mere subjects of the Monarchy in Britain, and the continent to being mere colonies of the Crown. They failed in fomenting the bloody American Civil War, also known as the War Between the States, to turn historic trends against each other. The dirty trick included instigating states to breakaway from the central government, forming the Confederacy, yet based on natural hatred between the industrial North and the slave-agricultural South.
And the British during World War One seized portions of the failing Turkish Ottoman Empire, which included portions of the Mid-East, such as now called Iraq. Like in the attempt to wreck the American Empire, the British by the 1930s had to abandon Iraq and later were involved in controlling the Peacock Throne, Persia, Iran.
By the late 1980s, through their secret political police, the U.S. was well along to breaking up the Soviet Empire, previously known as the Czarist Russian Empire. A super secret unit of the U.S. Treasury, in combination with the American CIA, produced a superior quality counterfeit Soviet paper currency, the ruble. Also used, in part, was a flood of superior quality countefeit U.S. paper currency, that is, Federal Reserve Notes, masquerading as the "U.S. Dollar".
The bogus paper money was produced by a team of world-class engravers, known in the counterfeit trade as "master cutters". [Discussed earlier in this series.] The details became known in that Daddy Bush, as President together with the CIA and the Treasury, failed to pay the counterfeiters. A little-known federal court case deals with the hang-up. The counterfeiters demanded absolute proof that they would be paid the huge, promised fees in valid, not bogus, money.
So the Moscow government was toppled the classic way, with being financially undermined with super-duper fake money.
The result? The breakaway provinces of what was previously the Soviet Empire. The Russians with great military means but suffering huge casualties, have been seeking to punish some of these breakaway pieces of their vast land, treasures, minerals, and such.
mailto:k@ameritech.net
The Bush Crime Family, jointly with Bill and Hillary Clinton as cohorts, have not given up on pro-British diabolical methods to divide up the States, not OF AMERICA, but IN AMERICA. As we have shown, the Bushies have a One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account with the Queen of England, in her private enterprise, Coutts Bank London. [Related documents are in our website series "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush"; copies of the One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account have been circulated by us, and an authenticated copy is part of the website of a radio talk show which has me on from time to time, <http://www.cloakanddagger.ca/>http://www.cloakanddagger.ca/]
The One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account, the Bushies/the Queen, is made up from private partnership funds of Daddy Bush and Saddam Hussein, a creation of the American CIA. [Little-known federal case in Chicago that dealt with this, where I was the only journalist covering it, is dealt with in detail in our website story "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh".]
n its simplest form, Enron and Arthur Andersen accounting, were dirty tricks of the American CIA, in with Carylyle Group, the Bush Crime Family, as run in part by former top British government officials. Enron officials reportedly arranged to falsify out-of-state electric transmissions to California. Thus created, was a fraudulent shortage of electric power in California right before and right after the alleged presidential "election" of 2000. The California authorities, fighting "brown-outs" and actual "black-outs", had to pay as much as ten times the usual rate for electric power transmission from the grid.
To deal with an almost impossible monstrous deficit, California authorities have quietly been exploring avenues of rescue. They have secretly explored the idea of California becoming a breakaway STATE IN AMERICA. Some believe this is not quite the same as the states that brokeaway, instigated by the British, to form the Confederacy.
For this purpose, to have funds to pay their expenses, the California State authorities are considering to blockade California funds being sent to the Central Government in Washington, D.C., as "federal taxes", income taxes, withholding taxes, and other federal fees and expenses. The gathering emergency situation would justify such an action. BUT, how can it be carried out? The State authorities can freeze accounts in banks located in California, about to transmit federal tax funds to the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury. The largest bank chain in California has been Bank of America, and its holding firm, Bank America. Once headquartered in San Francisco, they now have their headquarters in North Carolina. By the way, some deem them already insolvent because of horrendous gambling by them in gold and oil derivatives, speculators' hocus-pocus, in the trillions of dollars jointly with J.P. Morgan Chase.
Another groups of banks operating in California is Wells Fargo, a major function of which is to funnel covert CIA funds for operations in Asia and the Pacific Basin. Some contend major Wells Fargo stockholder, Warren Buffet, actually has his so-called "fortune" secretly based on CIA operations in illicit transactions, such as dope. Most every bank located in California has as major owners, the huge Japanese mafia, the Yakuza. [Visit our website series on the Yakuza.]
In anticipation of this, the Bush White House has formulated several plans. [1] Scheme Number One. Before the California Governor Recall Movement got so heated up, the Rasputin of the White House, the sinister Karl Rove, worked an apparent deal with Arnold Schwarzenegger to somehow push him in as the new California Governor. The weight-lifting steroid-using movie star is perfect. The Bush Family, as documented beyond challenge, helped install Adolf Hitler. [Such as "The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush", published in 1992, authors Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin.Some websites have the entire book.Use a search engine.]
Arnold has a suitable Pro-Nazi background, and marrying Maria Shriver, whose father married into the Kennedy Family, is in with a group whose patriarch, Joseph P. Kennedy, was Pro-Hitler while U.S.Ambassador to London up to 1940.
Arnold's father, in Austria, was reportedly an official of the Nazi Party. In the 1980s, Arnold actively promoted the election to a top post in Austria of Kurt Waldheim. The former U.N. chief Waldheim had carefully concealed that in World War Two, he was part of an elite unit in the Nazi military committing atrocities against Jews and others in the Balkans.
[2] Scheme Number Two.To counter this or actually to take advantage of the situation of emergency, the occupant and resident of the White House has planned either to nationalize the California State National Guard, or to call up U.S. Military Reservists. What is the justification?
The U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4 provides:
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Exectutive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
[Cynics jointly with know-nothings, seeing the old-time language using capital letters of the Constitution, would prefer the ludicrous version that Bush could install a GOP form of government, that is a REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Ha, ha.]
This purportedly empowers the occupant and resident of the White House, assuming he still retain his powers as purported Commander-in-Chief, to send in troops to deal with a version of uprising against the Central Government. In an exclusive story in our Middle-Finger News series, we raise the apparent issue that key forces within the U.S. Military and elsewhere in the Central Government, have quietly taken away the "football" from George W. Bush, that is, the suitcase by Marine Guard carrying the nuclear codes. A week before he was forced to resign facing Impeachment, Nixon had the "football" taken away from him by Nixon White House Chief of Staff, General Alexander Haig, as the General was ordered by his Jesuit relative.
I first raised related issues a few days after the alleged presidential "election" in the year 2000. Visit our website earlier story, "The Breakaway States IN AMERICA". Also as to dealing with an emergency visit our 2/5/1 item "The American Troika".
Is the situation in California made-to-order for the Bush Crime Family, as instigated by the British Crown, to cancel the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights? Is it because we ae facing terrible military disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan? Is it because the real facts of 9-11 are about to become more well known, that the Arabs were NOT directly involved, but that it was a bloody scheme, to sacrifice ordinary Americans to instigate a war. See the book with the documents, that came out right before 9-11, "Body of Secrets" by James Bamford, detailing the crazies in the Joint Chiefs of Staff and their plan, Northwoods Project, to instigate a war against Cuba. It reads much like 9-11.
Other bankrupt states in the Southwest are quietly considering the plan of becoming Breakaway STATES IN AMERICA, including Arizona, Colorado, Orgeon, and the State of Washington.

More coming....Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar38.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 37

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 37
by Sherman H. Skolnick 7/27/03

Testing A Coup

Supposing there was a sizeable military unit. And they threatened violence in the main city of the Republic. They demanded that the President and the Cabinet resign. Why? The rebellious military accused them of corruption and the Presi dent of orchestrating fake terrorist violence by way of controlling the country that way.
Was there such a test and who instigated it? The experiment was in progress on July 27, 2003, in Manila, the Republic of the Philippines. (The capital being Quezon City.)
The President stated, that as Commander-in-Chief, she is informing the rebellious military unit that they crossed the line of professionalism. That she is giving them such and such number of hours to surrender or forces will be sent to put down the rebellion (implying that there were forces loyal to her as President and Commander-in-Chief).
In 1972, a previous Philippine President, to entrench his dictatorial power, staged fake would-be-violence against himself, stating there was in the works, a movement to overthrow him. That Philippine President thereafter, suspended th e Philippine Constitution invoking Martial Law. These tests were/are important because the Philippine Constitution is patterned after, if not identical, to the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Was it an "accidental" happening in 1972? Is it just a coincidence in 2003, when the occupant and resident of the U.S. White House was installed by a Military-Style, five person Junta of the U.S. Supreme Court? And that drumhead Justic e installed who was to be the occupant and resident of the White House. Were ordinary Americans aware of, if not shocked, by what some called "The Gang of Five", declaring in a just-before-Midnight proclamation that Americans have no fundamental right to vote for President, rather, just a very limited right to vote for Presidential Electors who, in turn, meeting as the Electoral College, after the supposed Presidential Election, to themselves choose who, if anyone, is to be in the White House.
Through website and foreign news items, important questions have been raised. [1] That the tragedy of September 11, 2001, did not, in being actually carried out, involve Arabs. That the bloodshed against American s on that day was greatly patterned after the Northwoods Project, planned by dictatorial Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962, wanting to justify an invasion of Cuba. The documents were first publicized in a book coming out shortly before 9-11, namely, "Body o f Secrets" by James Bamford, an expert on the super-secret NSA, the National Security Agency. 2] The Arabs were not actually on any of the accused aircraft in 9-11, but were blamed for the happenings by the White House with the aid of the lapdog press. Some of the Arabs were actually Saudi exchange students studying how to fly airplanes and such, while living on U.S. Military facilities. At least seven of the supposed 19 Arab hi-jackers actually are still alive residing in North Africa, among other places.
The problem of understanding 9-11 is purposely intensified by the oil-soaked, spy-riddled American monopoly press which promotes short attention span and that ordinary Americans are to be fed news like to eight year old children. So in reporting the coup test in Manila now, the press will purposely forget the prior Manila event of 1972 and Martial Law test.
Also part of the problem obstructing ordinary Americans from understanding all this is both the education system combined with the mass media.
The subject of the Aristocracy, the Establishment, "the powers that be", the Ruling Class, whatever THEY are called, is a forbidden topic. The criminal underpinnings of the Aristocracy is not a subject, in high schools, or colleges and universities. And the popular press does not/will not ever deal with such subjects. Why? Simple. It would cause ordinary Americans to be class conscious, unlike Europeans who generally are so aware of that. Those who control Congress, the White House a nd the Executive branch, as well as the Judiciary, from behind the scenes, are not identified, generally not pictured, or referred to.
Books such as "The Rich and The Super Rich", by Ferdinand Lundberg, published in 1968, are mostly unknown to many ordinary Americans. And his other opus, "The Myth of Democracy" is likewise so. Gustavus Myers' book, "The Great American Fortunes", published in the 1930s, and documenting the criminal past of the Ruling Families, is seldom nowadays referred to or to be found in many libraries. Some Americans are merely amused by Gore Vidal's blistering statements that those who rule us are not the ones we see on the television but persons behind the scenes.
Who dares refer to the Bush Crime Family? And that they are not the aristocracy but merely scapegoats and stooges for the plans of the British and the Monarchy, to take back this continent, reverting ordinary Americans to be just subje cts of British colonies. Who among the popular pundits in the press, on the tv or radio, refers to the persistent efforts of the British to overthrow the American central government? Starting, at least since the War of 1812, when in 1814, they burned do wn the U.S. Capitol? And what about the three U.S. Presidents assassinated for the benefit of the British who wanted to snuff out American industrial development (Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, and William McKinley. In addition, the American Civil War , seldom properly identified, was instigated by the British to promote the natural friction between the Industrial North and the Agricultural South, and the divisive issue of slavery. That is to divide up this nation, to Balkanize America).
It remains to be seen how the Manila experiment will play out. Has it been secretly instigated as a test later to be for real in the U.S.? Is the American Central Government facing military disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq? Has the most monstrous treason been committed against ordinary Americans? That is, treachery calculated to be falsely blamed onto Arabs, such as 9-11?
[NOTE: our stories are also listed on http://www.rense.com/ MAIN PAGE, left-hand side, click on COLUMNISTS Sherman Skolnick. THAT website often posts our stories sooner than our own website.]

More coming....Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar37.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 36

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 36
by Sherman H. Skolnick 7/15/03

The Judges and the Shadow Government

In law, there is a principle described as customs, practices, and usages. In simple terms, it means certain habits that those who rule us use by way of conducting themselves. BUT, these ingrained ways are generally not written down, ye t are clearly understood as the accepted and established way of government.

For example, in the South for a hundred years after the American Civil War, or as southerners call it The War Between The States, the customs, practices, and usages, were that whites would not  respect the Equal Protection of the Law guarantees as to blacks. Lynchings were condoned, and whites would eat their picnic lunch while watching blacks hanging from a tree. The Ku Klux Klan, although dominated some fifty per cent by FBI agents and informants, was more or less allowed to run wild and terrorize blacks. Some Federal judges, such as in Mississippi, were known to chase blacks out of their courts while hurling racial slurs against them. It was a customs, practice, and usage, that blacks had separate fountains to drink wa ter from, in public facilities.

In Chicago, we spoke to an  Afro-American lawyer, formerly a government official, who told us how the federal courts in Chicago likewise mistreat black attorneys, even now. He decided not to make any public statements about t he same. Italian-American lawyers told us similar things from first-hand experience. Namely, that lawyers of color and of certain ethnic groups, are looked down upon by the Chicago federal judges, some of whom are persons of color themselves. That is, t he judges prefer "pin-stripe" suit attorneys, WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). No, it is not as blatant as having black attorneys drinking from a separate fountain. BUT, their petitions are routinely rejected, so that they cannot hope to make a li ving in the Chicago federal courts.

Some of the accepted ways of the judiciary, state and federal:

[1] The buying and selling of judgeships in courts at all levels. We discussed this in a website item "Buying a Judgeship". Because of certain circumstances, some of this is even coming out in the monopoly press. Such as "Ex-Judge gets 27 months in bribery case; U.S. still probing whether he paid for seat on bench". Chicago Tribune, 7/26/2002.

A popular website (www.worldnetdaily.com, 6/19/03)referred to a story in a major New York publication:
"In an admission that has New York Supreme Court [actually a lower court] in an uproar, a retired Brooklyn judge said he paid $35,000 to a Democratic leader more than three decades ago to get a seat on the bench, New York Newsday repor ts. The payment, says Thomas R. Jones, 89, was 'IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUSTOMS AND PRACTICES OF THE DAY', though he added, 'it was not right then, it's not right now' ".(Emphasis added.)

The article went on to discuss how judges and lawyers knew that certain lawyers were "bagmen", used as go-betweens of lawyers and corrupt jurists.

In our website series on "Coca-Cola, CIA, and the Courts", we mentioned how a known criminal-type bought the bench for Chicago Federal District Judge Blanche M. Manning[(312)435-7608]. An elite federal investigative unit, contacted us.

 Government investigators: "Your story, also in the court record, that Judge Manning's judgeship was bought, is not correct."

Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts: "What is wrong with our court statement and our website story?"
Government investigators: "You state that her judgeship was bought for one million dollars by a known power-broker, described as a mobster. It is not a correct amount. Our inquiry has determined that the power-broker paid two million d ollars."

Citizen's Committee: "So, is that all you found wrong with our position on the buying of that Judgeship? That we mentioned a lower amount?"

Government investigators: "Yes, you have stated a wrong amount."

He did not inform us what, if anything, would be done against the Judge and her patron/judgeship buyer.

Since the buying of judgeships is a known custom, practice, and usage, what are the obvious conclusions? Such as, the criminal-types, or political power-brokers, that buy the judgeship and install someone of THEIR choice, then are in a position to profit in some way from the judge thus put in place. Some call it, pulling on the chain. (In the New York example, however, the retired Judge claimed it did not effect his rulings. Really?)

[2] The handling of court records. No accountability. There is a practice moreso in the federal courts in the U.S., of the judges NOT SIGNING THE COURT RULINGS by them, particularly so in civil cases. So, were you, as we have for decad es, to have examined decisions by U.S. District Judges and then their supervisors, the reviewing courts, U.S. Courts of Appeal, it is quite evident the Judges DO NOT SIGN THEIR NAME.

What is the rationale, off-the-record, and behind-the-scenes? Namely, that many of the federal court decisions are NOT made by the Judges who are simply a front. The decisions are made by law clerks, also "minute clerks" as they are re ferred to. In plain lingo, we have long since known that to corrupt the judiciary, you have to lean on their secretaries, their minute clerks, their law clerks, sometimes just the court bailiffs or deputy marshals, or their ghost-writing law profes sors. Further, in some instances, the decisions are written by former law school students or present or former law professors, particularly so where the judges are former law professors.

We have given as examples of corrupt practices, that three Chicago Federal Appeals Judges, and one judge on the U.S. Supreme Court, are all formerly from Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School. (7th Circuit Judges Richard A. Po sner (312) 435-5806); Frank H. Easterbrook (312) 435-5808, were law professors, and 7th Circuit Judge Diane P. Wood (312) 435-5521, was Dean of the Law School. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, was a professor there.)They commit perjury, in vio lation of the federal criminal code, in that they have failed to disclose that they, on the bench, represent the Billion Dollar stock and bond portfolio of Rockefeller's University of Chicago. This disclosure, which they have not made, is an annual mand atory judicial financial disclosure, failure to reveal the same by their signed form, being perjury, under federal law.
What is the problem with the judges, as is their custom, practice, and usage, not to sign their name to their rulings? The ghost-written decisions in important cases, not every case, contain judicial perjuries. That is, the established undisputed facts in the court record show it is DAY. To make a corrupt and arbitrary ruling, the judges' rulings say it is NIGHT, and apply NIGHT case law.

The litigant "loser" and/or their attorney is puzzled. Rarely, if ever, do lawyers confront the corrupt judges with their judicial perjury. Funny thing, since the decisions are often ghost-written, the judges, supposely in all candor, could say, but never do, "I did not write that. I know nothing about that decision. You can't hold me responsible and accountible. Why? Because I also did NOT sign it." It is a corrupt and rotten way of carrying out the unwritten customs, practices, and usages, of the Bench and the Bar.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar36.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 35

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 35
by Sherman H. Skolnick 6/26/03

High Court and High Crimes
In even the largest reference libraries, there are almost no books stating the true history of America's highest tribunal, the U.S. Supreme Court. The same is true of law libraries and those of law schools.
Early in the 19th Century, for upwards of 35 years, the Chief Justice of the high court was John Marshall. Portraits of him, in gold edged frames, hang in many law schools. In Chicago, a law school is named after him.
>From the beginning of this nation, one of the greatest crimes against the inhabitants here, was the huge land swindles. With the formation of the United States of America, formed from the 13 colonies, only the State Courts, not the Federal Courts, were equipped and inclined to combat terrible offenses committed by the plutocrats of that era.
Chief Justice Marshall, issuing a ruling of his court with flowery language, in so many words, arrogantly proclaimed that the federals are the dominant force and that the State Judges, are, in effect, mere vassals, handcuffed, powerless peons. Law stude nts, starry eyed from consuming perfumed windbags of idealistic law, are forever mouthing off that supposedly "wonderful" decision, Marbury versus Madison.
The Chief Justice's own brother was one of the great land swindlers whose case ended up in the high court. The Chief Justice did NOT disqualify himself. Guess who won in his crooked Court? Nowadays, as we have dared point out, the banker-judges sitting in high tribunals, likewise do not disqualify themselves when their own financial interests are the subject matter before their Court.
So, state court remedies against big land pirates, were snuffed out by the Chief Justice and his well-disguised pronouncements.
As set forth in this website series, since the War of 1812, when the British invaded this nation and burned down the Capitol, the British have repeatedly vowed to overthrow the American Republic, reverting this land to British rule, with Americans becom ing mere subjects of a London Monarchy, rather than citizens and residents of a duly formed Republic operating here.
For the benefit of British rulers, three U.S. Presidents were assassinated, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, and William McKinley, all of whom opposed British interference with the American industrial development. In its true significance, the America n Civil War, also known as the War Between the States, was in great part, instigated by the British. They added to the natural and historical friction between the industrial North, and the agricultural, non-industrial, slave-owning South. British ships ran the Northern blockade to supply the Confederacy with weapons made in England.
In preparation for civil war, the pro-British Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Roger Taney, a devout Catholic (not really a contradiction), in 1856 added to the North-South agitation. He ruled in the Dred Scott case, that black slaves in America were mere chattel, mere baggage, that could be moved from place to place without any restraints of law. And get this, by the 21st Century, the Dred Scott decision has not been excised from the law books. [As to the concealed Catholic issue in American history, see the heavily documented opus, "The Rulers of Evil" by F. Tupper Saussy.]
In Persian Gulf War One, 1990-91, Daddy Bush, as President, sent great numbers of black GIs to fight for the backward Monarchies of Saudi and Kuwait. Yet, that late in the 20th Century, those two dictatorships had large numbers of black chattel slaves.
I was about the only one to raise the issue at the time that it was unconstitutional for an American ruler to send black soldiers to fight for the benefit and protection of black slave owners. [Visit part 30, of this website series.]
Published early in the 20th Century was a heavily-documented book, dealing with the U.S. Supreme Court as well as the legal history of America, "Supreme Court", by Gustavus Myers. The book is so much as banned, not to be usually found in even the larges t law libraries.
As to the post-Civil War era, see the book entitled simply "1876" by Gore Vidal. Published in 1976, it deals with how the 1876 Presidential election was stolen by corruption of Congress and the high court. Was it a mere concidence that the book was re-i ssued in paperback in the Spring of the year 2000, ahead of the presidential election? A key part of the theft of the presidency revolved in 1876---get this---on election ballot finagling in Florida. Samuel Tilden was the duly elected President but was blocked, apparently by federal troops, from approaching the Inauguation stands in 1877. In that year, like occurred in 2001 with George W. Bush, Rutherford Hayes became the "fictitious" president. Gore, like Tilden, was the duly elected President BUT NO T INAUGURATED. A result was many called him Rutherfraud. We see fit to call the present occupant, Bushfraud. Rutherford Hayes and his gang made corrupt deals, including with the U.S. Supreme Court. The result, a group of cases with the ominous title called "The Slaughter House" cases. In 1883, the high court arbitrarily nullified the federal civil rights laws of 1871, which had granted to blacks and others the right to bring their demand for remedies of injustice into the federal courts such as against nightriders of the Ku Klux Klan. The poisonous and corrupt high court ruling of 1883 was not corrected unti l almost 80 years later in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Monroe versus Pape, granting blacks the right to be in federal court Chicago to sue corrupt Chicago police who had a system of beating blacks until they admitted to something, in the meantime, arbitrarily shooting blacks in Chicago without established reasons or provocation, such as while the blacks were in their own apartment asleep.
In 1970, was formed a subcommittee to consider the possible impeachment of U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, for his links, while on the bench, in business with known gangsters, the Albert Parvin Foundation matter. Part of the subcommittee came to Chicago and met in my residence to hear and write down my testimony. The details about me, Chief Judge Campbell and high court Judge Douglas, became part of a U.S. government printed report. Most of the subcommittee agreed with me. The two judge s involved, however, hired lobbyists with suitcases of money who apparently leaned on the subcommittee and Justice William O. Douglas was not made subject to impeachment.
At a later date, I and my colleagues dug up data showing that Chief Judge Campbell was secretly the owner of several tall downtown Chicago buildings, all in the maiden name of his wife. Campbell used his judicial clout to compel several federal agencies to lease space in his skyscrapers, despite the fact that it was not appropriate to their work and was way overcharged per square foot. Judge Campbell moreover got into a ruckus with some of his former business partners who sued Campbell's cronies. My t estimony succeeded in wrecking the Chief Judge's extortion attempt against his former business partners.
In the 1930s, to the great injury and damage to ordinary Americans, the U.S. Supreme Court, packed with banker-judges, arbitrarily ruled in the gold clause cases that ordinary Americans cannot insist on gold to support contracts and other dealings. In19 37, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the greatest counter-revolutionary in modern history, tried to get an arm-lock on the banker-judges by his own "court-packing" scheme, to fill up the court with more judges than previously by law provided for. The FD R trick failed, and the banker-judges succeeded in smashing down laws of Congress designed to alleviate the suffering of workers in the Great Depression.
In 1967, I brought as a Chicago voter, on behalf of myself and all other Chicago voters similarly situated, a class action federal suit (Skolnick versus Mayor & City Council of Chicago, U.S. District Court, Chicago.) I sought to remedy the situation whe rein Chicago's 50 election districts for City Council, called Wards, were grossly gerrymandered. That did not comply with the re-apportionment provisions of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment, requiring districts, wards, of equal populati on. Further, the ward boundary lines were so abitrarily drawn, that it prevented blacks and latinos from having proper representatives in the city government tribunal. The case was assigned to Chief District Judge William Campbell; despite me being self -educated in law, he ordered a lawyer to speak for me. I told the lawyer, who I did not authorize to speak for me, that if he did claim to speak for me, that I would sue him for malpractice in another court. In a stand-off, the Ch! ief Judge relented, and I was allowed to speak for myself as well as the class of Chicago voters. I proceeded with my suit under the "one man, one vote" doctrine. [Eventually, my litigation succeeded in getting more complete representation in the City Council fo r latinos and blacks.]
I filed a motion to remove Chief Judge Campbell from the case. As i showed, without challenge or dispute, the Chief Judge, while on the bench, was also the director of a gangster-operated money laundry, called the Albert Parvin Foundation, named for a C hicago hoodlum who moved to Nevada. Get this while on the bench of the U.S. Supreme Court, the President of the Albert Parvin Foundation was U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, a supposed liberal who in his spare time was a mountain-climber.
My city council case generated lots of mentions in the monopoly press, such as for 40 seconds or so on the radio or tv. So I came one day to the courtroom of Chief Judge Campbell to present my motion to remove him from the case. I asked that he disquali fy himself in that I and the Chicago voters could not be assured of a fair hearing and adjudication at his hands, he being in business with known gangsters, and thus subject to blackmail and corrupt manipulation.
Having heard of the expected hearing, eighteen reporters showed up, sitting right behind me as I silently waited my turn to present my motion to the Chief Judge. Without provocation, suddenly two of the Chief Judge's court bailiffs grabbed hold of my wh eelchair and began to turn me upside down. All of the reporters were witnesses to this outrage. None of their reports or comments appeared in print, on the radio, or on the tv. Chief Judge Campbell released a statement, that he heard from certain unspecified sources, that I was there, not to present any court papers, but rather to shoot him. He offered no details from my long public career to support such ridiculous contention s that I was anti-social and would use violence.
I brought a damage suit against his two court bailiffs, contending that I was the son of orthodox Jews and that I obeyed my parents orders never to handle or carry weapons. (Skolnick versus Guadno, et al., Chicago U.S. District Court.) My case ended up before the banker-judges in Chicago's federal appeals court. They ruled, in a law book published decision, that I was not entitled to any remedy. There was no dispute or challenge to the facts that I was there to seek to remove Chief Judge Campbell beca use of his undisputed position, while a judge, as a Director of a hoodlum Foundation. The judges ruled that despite the fact that I am a defenseless cripple silently sitting in a wheelchair in the courtroom, that the bailiffs were immune from being sued despite the undisputed facts that they perpetrated, in full view of 18 witnesses, an assault and battery upon me, without cause or provocation.
In 1971, I had won a successful verdict against the U.S. government spying on anti-war activists, like myself, while they pretended to be a news media service. (Skolnick versus 113th Military Intelligence Group, pretending to be Midwest Audio-Visual New s, Chicago U.S. District Court.) In 1971, William Rehnquist was the top U.S. Justice Department official heading a secret unit, arranging through ulterior means to block verdicts in federal court against spying by the U.S. Military against anti-war acti vists.A few years later, when being ratified as a new Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, Rehnquist sought to conceal this role from the U.S. Senate ratifying committee.
Later, Justice Rehnquist was the key judge on the high court in a ruling favoring Military Intelligence Units sued for illegal spying on anti-war activists. He did not disqualify himself and his rotten ruling destroyed the validity of my court verdict a gainst U.S. government spying.In plain lingo, Justice Rehnquist had committed a fraud upon his own court.
In 1986, he was appointed Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, requiring him to be again before a U.S. Senate ratifying committee. He sought to conceal his role, before becoming a federal official, that he was a lawyer in the Southwest. Witnesses we re available to prove that there were a line of blacks and latinos, waiting to register to vote. Rehnquist assaulted and harassed them, stating in so many words, "Hey, get out of here. You have no right to vote!"
In his book, "The Myth of Democracy", Ferdinand Lundberg set forth the true basis for the supposed de-segregation decision of the high court in 1954, Brown vs. Board of Education. Namely, that at the time in Africa, British and French colonies were breaking away from the mother country to become independent nations run by blacks.
American foreign policy in Africa was being ridiculed and discredited by actions within the U.S. by hundreds of years of mistreatment of blacks in America. Such as the continuing lynching of blacks, by hanging them from trees, while whites nearby were amused as they sat watching and eating their picnic lunch. Lundberg in his classic book of 1968, "The Rich and the Super-Rich", pointed out that the very wealthy are some of the most stupid persons in the world and continue to abuse and beat down common people until one day, there is a revolution where the heads of the rulers and top clergy are chopped off.
According to witnesses, just as the results of the year 2000 Presidential Election were coming in, Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, were heard each separately commenting that if Albert Gore, Jr., were to become President, that they could not carry out their plan, based on their advanced age and suffering from illinesses, to retire from the high court.
Justice Clarence Thomas' wife was a key figure in a group operating with GOP money to promote Bush. Justice Antonin Scalia's son was the lawyer participating with presenting the litigation to the high court, Bush versus Gore. These plus one other, made up the Military-Style Junta, called by some "The Gang of Five" that installed George W. Bush as the occupant and resident of the White House. Recall the details of comparisons between the 1876 corrupt installation of Hayes as the occupant and resident o f the White House and that of George W. Bush. Both, revolved in part on corruption of Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, and finagling with the election authorities in Florida. [For more details, visit our website stories about the 2000 President Electio n.]
To meet a deadline in December, 2000, the high court released their arbitrary ruling just before midnight. Justice Scalia scornfully announced that Americans did NOT have the right to vote for President, only the very limited right to vote for Electors, that antiquated appendage called the Electoral College (that became the basis for the corruption in Florida, and the bribery of top DEMOCRATS in southern Florida to stop the recount of the Gore ballots).
Acknowledging the arbitrary nature of the Bush vs Gore ruling, the Gang of Five put in their decision that it was NOT to be used as a precedent in any other election case or similar controversy. Thus, they admitted it was tainted, and should not be use d, as is otherwise customary, in some other litigation as a prior binding precedent decision.
Justice Antonin Scalia and two Chicago federal appeals judges, were together law professors at Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School. [That is 7th Circuit appeals judges Richard A. Posner (312) 435-5806 and his shadow and side-kick, Frank H. Ea sterbrook (312) 435-5808 ]. A third Judge on the 7th Circuit federal appeals court is Judge Diane P. Wood (312) 435-5521. She was Dean of the Law School. Together these four judges, while on the bench, also represent the multi-billion dollar stock and b ond portfolio of Rockefeller's University of Chicago.
These four judges are required to file an annual mandatory federal judicial financial disclosure form. They did NOT disclose their financial links, as required, to the Rockefellers.. Further, these forms require their signatures making them liable to fe deral criminal prosecution for perjury if they falsified or omitted any required details.And they did so omit and falsify.
So three federal appeals judges, one step below the high court, and their crony on the high court, have committed a fraud upon their own court. Also, they have committed a fraud upon the American common people and committed blatant injustices against th em. How many ordinary litigants were rejected by these judges in fronting for the Rockefellers and depriving Americans of Equal Justice under Law? These judges have failed to disqualify themselves in numerous cas es involving the financial ownership and interests of the Rockefellers.
So, Americans are being plundered by the scoundrels over the years occupying the U.S. Supreme Court. In violation of the social compact underlying our organic law, namely the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, we are NOT governed by rulers with o ur consent. The high court judges are not for the common people, but represent the interests and mandates of The Establishment, "the powers that be", the Ruling Class, in others words THEM. The failure to prosecute such Judges for high crimes or to remove them from office by impeachment trial, convinces some commentators that the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are a dead letter.

More coming....Stay tuned..

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar35.html