Image courtesy of Canada Free Press
By Douglas J. Hagmann
Please comment
on this article at Canada Free Press
3 August 2013: There is one thing certain about the publicized threat to
our embassies; it is not what it is presented to be.
To
accept the official explanation of a nebulous threat from al Qaeda as the
reason for closing our embassies across the Middle East and North Africa is
being dangerously naive and simplistic. This is much more serious than what we
are being told, but not for the reasons we are being given.
We are seeing the consequences of a long running “Cold War” on two major
fronts of
political conflict that could escalate into
military engagement with proxy nations of world super powers. The world,
and life as we know it, could change in an instant should we awaken one morning
to the news of bombs flying across the Middle East. That is a very real
possibility, as
we are now in a heightened proxy war
environment. We are standing in a thick forest of dry tinder, and the
smallest of sparks could ignite a conflagration the likes of which we have
never before seen.
How we arrived here
“The farther back you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see.”
This quote attributed to Winston Churchill is applicable to our current
situation as it is a consequence of our policies and actions in the Middle East
and north Africa.
First, it is important to understand that the so-called Arab Spring did not
start on December 18, 2010 as a spontaneous revolutionary wave of demonstrations
by people to rid themselves from the shackles of governmental oppression. It
was planned many years ago by the globalist power brokers, with the latest
incarnations perhaps sketched out in the bowels of a Saudi mansion or an estate
owned by a cabal of central bankers, partly to change the geopolitical power
structure of the Middle East, and partly as a “jobs program” for the
military-industrial complex.
This was confirmed by a 1300 word e-mail dated June 8,
2008, sent by former British Ambassador to Libya Sir Vincent Fean to Tony
Blair, just shy of a year
after Blair stepped down as prime
minister. The e-mail consisted of a briefing on the state of relations between
Great Britain and Colonel Muammar Gaddafi in advance of a visit by Blair to see
Gaddafi.
His June 10, 2008 visit with Gaddafi would be one of six made by
Blair after leaving office and just three years before Gaddafi
was deposed by the U.S. and UK led interests and ultimately murdered.
Exactly what was the purpose of this meeting as well as the others made by Tony
Blair on behalf of the Crown? According to the confidential information
obtained by
The Telegraph,
it was about a
prisoner transfer agreement that would be signed once Libya agreed to purchase
an air defense system to the tune of about £400 million. The prisoner?
Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi. Who would provide the air
defense system? MBDA, a missile developer and manufacturer with operations in
the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United States. They provide products
and services for over 90 militaries worldwide. They are a world leader in
missiles and missile systems, and employ about 10,000 people in France, the
United Kingdom, Italy, Germany and the United States, and produced about 3,000
missiles and missile systems last year alone.
It is not merely the military-industrial jobs program alone, however. According
to the confidential memo, a key objective of Great Britain was
to force
Libya to invest its £80? billion sovereign wealth fund through the City of London.
Additionally, the Department for International Development was also eyeing
another Libyan wealth fund worth £130 million “to pay for various schemes in
Sierra Leone and other poverty-stricken countries.”
Concurrent with the machinations of the UK, former French minister for Foreign
Affairs Roland Dumas shed additional light on plans relating to Libya and Syria
in an interview with the French TV station LCP:
“I’m going to tell you something.
I was in England two
years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British
officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.
This was in Britain not in America.
Britain was organizing an invasion of
rebels into Syria. They even asked me, although I was no longer minister
for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate. Naturally, I refused, I
said I’m French, that doesn’t interest me.” [emphasis by this author]
Dumas added: “The only thing I know [about French Leaders] is that they have
gone crazy. President Sarkozy hosted Gaddafi a few months ago at the Élysée
Palace, with a red carpet and all the grandiose honors. Two months later,
Sarkozy is leading a crusader war,
at the head of NATO, which has become a
pawn serving international politics. This has been going on for a long time.”
He further stated that
“I regret to see my country, to
which I belong with spirit, blood, and life, leading an instrument such as NATO
to come and destroy an entire people and attack its leaders.” [emphasis
by this author]
Due to the role of Mr. Dumas in the French government, he could not
reveal France’s role in the British plan as he would be exposing himself to
prosecution for revealing state secrets, thus explaining his statement “I’m
French, that doesn’t interest me.”
It should be clear that
the Arab Spring, including the
NATO action taken against Gaddafi’s Libya followed by the rebels attacks
against Assad, is part of a globalist agenda rather than a spontaneous uprising
that has become the official historical narrative for the naive.
Benghazi exposed
It was shortly after the September 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi that I wrote
in explicit detail the actual reason for that attack. Thanks to a highly placed
source in the intelligence venue,
readers learned the
truth ten months before the corporate media finally acknowledged that the
compound in Benghazi was the operations center for a large CIA weapons
smuggling operation where Libya was being used as a weapons storage depot to
arm the anti-Assad “rebels.”
The attack at Benghazi was described by this administration and the
Clinton State Department as a spontaneous protest over an internet video,
although that narrative was proven to be a lie.
It was
a lie they continued to stick with to hide the fact that the U.S., in
conjunction with other NATO allies, were actually doing the work of Saudi
Arab to be extended. Now the anti-Assad rebels are “on the
ropes,” and they are being beaten with every passing day, having lost much of
the covert assistance of the CIA.
This is the reason the true account of Benghazi has yet
to be told to the American people, and the reas oil. It would be helpful to understand the role Aramco and other
oil interests played in the establishment of the Saudi power structure.
As the Obama regime continued forward to advance this
Saudi-globalist agenda, Russia’s Putin warned the U.S. that the insanity of
destabilizing Syria was not in their best interests, and certainly not in ours.
When the warnings were not heeded, proxy groups for Russia, Syria and Iran, in
the form of Ansar al Sharia and AQIM launched a deadly assault on the CIA
operations center in Benghazi.
The continued pressure of possibly exposing the
true nature of the activities in Benghazi, from the illegal arms trafficking in
violation of international law to the attack itself, became a serious annoyance
to the globalist planners and the Obama subjects to the Saudi royals.
The assistance to the anti-Assad rebels was interrupted, albeit temporarily, by
this exposure. Consequently, the plans for Syria did not go off as intended,
and the timetable had to be extended. Now the anti-Assad rebels are “on the
ropes,” and they are being beaten with every passing day, having lost much of
the covert assistance of the CIA.
This is the reason the true account of Benghazi has yet
to be told to the American people, and the reason that the official accounts
are continually being pushed in place of the truth.
Today
If you have understood how we arrived here by the short summary provided,
then you will see that we are standing on the brink of
not just a regional war, but a global war. Those in power do not want you to
know their plans until there is nothing anyone can do to stop them.
It is vital to understand that the embassy closures are a signal of
the rapidly escalated intervention in the region by the US. It is a modern day equivalent to the Bay of Pigs, except Barack
Hussein Obama is no John F. Kennedy. Those old
enough might recall that the CIA trained and inserted a group of “freedom
fighters” into Cuba to oust Castro. Exactly like the rebels in Syria, those
fighters could never overthrow Castro without direct U.S. military intervention
and assistance. The situation is exactly the same in Syria today.
The difference is that Kennedy saw the plan for exactly what it was – a
globalist plan not to defeat communism, but to engage us in a larger war to the
benefit of the globalists and the military-industrial complex. He refused to
take the bait and in so doing, bought the world time by avoiding World War III.
Unlike Kennedy who became his own man while in office, Obama
continues the globalist agenda by supporting the CIA trained and backed
anti-Assad rebels, and is now leading us to the brink os the truth.
We are seeing the beginnings of the transformation from a cold war to a hot war
at the nation-state level. We are about to see a trigger event, after which
nothinCuban locals. Nothing that we are being told even
remotely approaches the truth, yet few seem to grasp the seriousness of
what is unfolding before our very eyes.
Our involvement in the Middle East and North Africa is so large that it would
be difficult not to telegraph our actions in advance. Therefore, is it possible
that the unspecified al Qaeda threat is actually a cover story for some
anticipated action in the region?
We are watching brinkmanship at multiple levels on a
global chess board. We have done much to destabilize whatever relative peace
might have existed in the Middle East through our actions at the hands of our
globalist power brokers. Russia, Iran, Syria and China are not amused, and are
not looking the other way. The time clock for the anti-Assad rebels is
quickly running out. This administration and every
elected official who has signed on to do the work of the Saudis and their
handlers have painted us into a corner from which there is little hope for
escape. We cannot trust anything we are being told, and nothing we are
being told even remotely approaches the truth.
We are seeing the beginnings of the transformation from a cold war to a hot war
at the nation-state level. We are about to see a trigger event, after which
nothing will be the same.
Click here
to save this article in PDF format 
Print Article
| 
is the day count fraction, i.e. the
portion of a year over which the rates are calculated, using the 
![[]](http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/RSSFEED.gif)
![[]](http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/ITUNESP.jpg)
![[]](http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/video/youtubepromo.gif)
