from Godfather
Politics...
STENOGRAPHER CLAIMS A MASONIC CONSPIRACY...DRAGGED OFF FLOOR
STENOGRAPHER CLAIMS A MASONIC CONSPIRACY...DRAGGED OFF FLOOR
If it’s one thing the Senate requires is decorum, and claims
of a Masonic conspiracy is not proper decorum. While the Senate members might
not care about governing in terms of the oath they took, they do like things
done “decently and in order.” National
Review Online makes the following report on a “surreal and chilling note”
about Masonic conspiracies that took place on the Senate floor yesterday. Was
it an omen?:
“The
government shutdown ended on a surreal and chilling note. Minutes before the
House finished voting for the Senate compromise, a stenographer was pulled out
of the chamber while yelling about conspiracies. A few people physically
removed her from the chamber and took her to an adjacent elevator. She
continued to yell. They were followed by a crowd of reporters and members of
Congress, including Representatives Al Green (D., Texas) and Louie Gohmert (R.,
Texas). It took a few moments for the elevator doors to open, so the people who
removed her from the chamber held her against the elevator as she yelled.
“This is
what I recorded of what she said: ‘This is not one nation under God. It never
was. Had it been, it would not have been – no – it would not have been – the
Constitution would not have been written by Freemasons! They go against God.
You cannot serve two masters. You cannot serve two masters. Praise Jesus
[recording unclear]. Lord Jesus Christ!’
Representative
Joaquin Castro (D., Texas) told reporters shortly afterward that the woman had
been working in the House as a stenographer for at least a few months. He said
she was at the podium right below the Speaker’s chair when she started to yell.
Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican, was presiding.
“‘It was
very disturbing for the members of Congress,’ Castro said.”
The view that there was a Masonic
conspiracy in Philadelphia is neither a new nor an uncommon belief. The
delegates were sent to revise the Articles of Confederation not create an
altogether new document. Many of them were Masons. It's obvious that the
national constitution is different from the state constitutions.
It was Patrick Henry who said that he “smelt a rat in
Philadelphia, tending toward the monarchy.” Not everyone was thrilled with the
New Constitution.
Dr. Gary North, who has written extensively on the secular/Masonic roots of the Constitution in his books Political Polytheism and Conspiracy in Philadelphia, writes:
Dr. Gary North, who has written extensively on the secular/Masonic roots of the Constitution in his books Political Polytheism and Conspiracy in Philadelphia, writes:
“What is
surprising is that so many conservative Christians today are seeking the
previously hidden Christian roots of the U.S. Constitution. These are not
hidden roots; they are missing roots. The roots of the Constitution are Rhode
Island political theory, Newtonian philosophy, Deist-Unitarian-Whig social
theory, Scottish Enlightenment rationalism, and Masonic universalism. The
Constitution’s structure was Christian-Puritan; its content was humanist.”
While there remains a debate on how much of a Masonic
conspiracy there was in 1787, the full operation of a conspiracy was certainly
in operation last night on the Senate floor.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/12919/senate-senate-stenographer-claims-masonic-conspiracy/#J3cmqZgQbDu8bMI5.99
