Sunday, October 27, 2013

Muslims my ass!

Subject: Muslims my ass!

> I want to shake the guy's hand that wrote this...

>

> Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital?

>

> Have you heard a Muslim orchestra?

>

> Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade?

>

> Have you witnessed a Muslim charity?

>

> Have you shaken hands with a Muslim Girl Scout?

>

> Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper?

>

> The answer is no, you have not. Just ask yourself WHY ???

>

>

>

> Barack Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America 's history."

>

>

>

> AN AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE

>

> Dear Mr. Obama:

>

> Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed?

>

> Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

>

> Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day?

>

> Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and

>

> Native American Indians.

>

>

>

> Can you show me one Muslim signature on the: United States Constitution?

>

> Declaration of Independence ?

>

> Bill of Rights?

>

> Didn't think so.

>

>

>

> Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England ?

>

> No.

>

>

>

> Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America ?

>

> No, they did not.

>

> In fact, Muslims to this day are

>

> still the largest traffickers in human slavery.

>

> Your own half-brother, a devout

>

> Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even

>

> though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as "pug nosed slaves."

>

> Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr. Obama?

>

>

>

> Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country?

>

> Not present.

>

> There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr.

>

> or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

>

>

>

> Where were Muslims during this country's

>

> Woman's Suffrage era?

>

> Again, not present.

>

> In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture.

>

> So much so, that often they are beaten for

>

> not wearing the 'hajib' or

>

> for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband.

>

> Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights,

>

> aren't they?

>

>

>

> Where were Muslims during World War II?

>

> They were aligned with Adolf Hitler.

>

> The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and

>

> accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews.

>

>

>

> Finally, Mr. Obama,

>

> where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001?

>

> If they weren't flying planes into

>

> the World Trade Center , the Pentagon or

>

> a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000

>

> people on our own soil, they were rejoicing

>

> in the Middle East .

>

> No one can dispute the pictures

>

> shown from all parts of the Muslim world

>

> celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news network's that day.

>

> Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims

>

> who's asses you bent over backwards to kiss in

>

> Cairo , Egypt on June 4th were

>

> stone cold silent post 9-11.

>

> To many Americans,

>

> their silence has meant approval

>

> for the acts of that day.

>

>

>

> And THAT, Mr. Obama,

>

> is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here

>

> in America ...

>

>

>

> Oh, I'm sorry, I

>

> forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates.

>

> They were Muslims.

>

>

>

> And now we can add November 5, 2009 -

>

> the slaughter of American soldiers at

>

> Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor

>

> and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be

>

> counseling soldiers returning from battle in

>

> Iraq and Afghanistan .

>

> Also, don't forget the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.2013 was done by 2 Muslim Brothers. That, Mr. Obama

>

> is the "Muslim heritage" in America

>

>

>

> EVERY AMERICAN

>

> MUST READ THIS !!

>

> Be sure to

>

> SEND IT TO ALL.

>

>

>

> Muslim Heritage, my ass.

>

> And if you don't share this message,

>

> you are part of the problem!






RARE ZAPRUDER FOOTAGE: MULTIPLE JFK ASSASSINS

  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Warren Commission, in its effort to portray Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone assassin of President John F. Kennedy, had to ignore or otherwise obfuscate abundant medical evidence and testimony that JFK suffered an exit wound in the back of his head.
A front-entry wound in his body means that more than one shooter had to have been involved, as Oswald’s Texas School Book Depository building was behind JFK’s limo when the shooting began.
One little known piece of evidence can be found at the end of the famous film footage by Abraham Zapruder, as the presidential limo is about to go under the triple overpass, says WND senior writer Jerome Corsi, author of the newly released “Who Really Killed Kennedy? 50 Years Later: Stunning New Revelations about the JFK Assassination.”
The remarkable series of frames in the Zapruder film shows a frantic Jackie Kennedy in the back seat propping her husband up to a full sitting position, as if he were alive.
The sequence, rarely watched or studied, begins to be clearly seen around frame 456.
In the instant after the fatal headshot, Jackie Kennedy reacted with the type of hysteria that some unfortunate victims experience who have lost an appendage or part of an appendage. Just as those victims will try to jam the severed appendage back in place, in the film Jackie scrambles onto the trunk of the limo trying to grab some part of JFK’s skull or brain matter.
Once Jackie gets back in the seat, it appears she desperately tries to put her husband back together again to the point of moving the head flap back in place.
Zapruder film, frame 456
By frame 456, JFK can be seen in an upright sitting position, even though he is brain dead from the massive headshot wounds.
Zapruder film frame 456 enlarged shows more clearly the discoloration in the back of JFK’s head that has been interpreted to represent bloody hair from a massive exit wound.
“Who Really Killed Kennedy,” released last month as the 50th anniversary of the assassination approaches, is bolstered by recently declassified documents that shed new light on the greatest “who-done-it” mystery of the 20th century. Corsi sorted through tens of thousands of documents, all 26 volumes of the Warren Commission’s report, hundreds of books, several films and countless photographs.
Jackie blacks out
In her testimony to the Warren Commission, Jackie Kennedy was asked if she remembered Secret Service Agent Clint Hill, who climbed on the back of the limo to help.
“I don’t remember anything,” she answered, adding a few questions later that she had no recollection whatsoever of climbing out on the back of the car after the shooting.
Secret Service Agent Clint Hill wrote a 2012 book, “Mrs. Kennedy and Me,” in which he describes his experience during the JFK assassination.
“I heard the shot. The third shot,” he wrote. “The impact was like the sound of something hard hitting something hollow – like the sound of a melon shattering onto the cement. In the same instant, blood, brain matter, and bone fragments exploded from the back of the president’s head. The president’s blood, parts of his skull, bits of his brain were splattered all over me – on my face, my clothes, in my hair.”
For Hill to have seen brain matter explode out of JFK’s head, the wound at the back of the president’s must have been an exit wound.
“As I peered into the backseat of the car,” Hill recalled. “I saw the president’s head in [Jackie’s] lap. His eyes were fixed, and I could see inside the back of his head. I could see inside the back of the president’s head.”
The importance of the few frames at the end of the Zapruder film is the fleeting view of the back of JFK’s head.
The hair around the back head wound is a richer brownish-red color, with the discoloration adjacent to the right ear about the size of a grapefruit.
While the visual evidence of Zapruder frame 456 is not indisputable proof of a rear exit wound to JFK’s head, the discoloration at the back of his head observed in frame 456 is consistent with the description of the head wound made public by the physicians at Parkland Hospital that attended JFK.
‘Massive wound at the back of his head’
Immediately after JFK’s death, the Parkland Hospital medical team went public with their conclusion that the wound they observed in the occipital range of his head near the right ear, a wound most described as being the size of a grapefruit, was an exit wound.
At the Parkland Hospital press conference held one hour and 15 minutes after JFK had been pronounced dead, Dr. Malcolm Perry, one of the attending physicians in the emergency room, and Dr. Kemp Clark, a neurosurgeon who also attended to JFK in the emergency room, attributed the cause of death to a massive wound at the back of his head.
The two physicians knew almost nothing about the facts of the assassination and were cautious about making deductions from the medical evidence.
Clark exhibited caution when he told a reporter that “the head wound could have been either the exit wound from the neck or it could have been a tangential wound, as it was simply a large, gaping loss of tissue.”
Either way, it’s clear the two doctors considered the gaping hole at the back of JFK’s skull to have been an exit wound and the bullet hole observed in JFK’s neck to have been an entrance wound.
Dr. Charles Carrico, a surgeon doing his residency at Parkland Hospital at the time, was the first physician to treat JFK in the emergency room. In his testimony to the Warren Commission, Carrico described JFK’s head wound in questioning from assistant counsel Arlen Specter, who later served 30 years in the U.S. Senate:
Dr. Carrico: [JFK’s head wound] was a 5- by 51-cm defect in the posterior skull, the occipital region. There was an absence of the calvarium or skull in this area, with shredded tissue, brain tissue present and initially considerable slow oozing. Then after we established some circulation there was more profuse bleeding from the wound.
Mr. Specter: Was any other wound observed on the head in addition to this large opening where the skull was absent?
Dr. Carrico: No other wound on the head.
Dr. Robert McClelland, a surgeon on the staff of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, was giving a lecture at Parkland Hospital when JFK was brought into the emergency room.
Summoned to the emergency room, McClelland arrived after the tracheotomy had been given. Putting on surgical gloves, McClelland also observed a massive wound to the back of JFK’s head.
He testified to the Warren Commission that through that wound, “you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that possibly a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral tissue and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out.”
McClelland’s testimony shows that the emergency room doctors were more concerned with trying to save the president’s life than trying to figure out how he had been shot.
“The initial impression that we had was that perhaps the wound in the neck, the anterior part of the neck, was an entrance wound and that it had perhaps taken a trajectory off the anterior vertebral body and again into the skull, exiting out the back, to produce the massive injury in the head,” he testified.
“However, this required some straining of the imagination to imagine that this would happen, and it was much easier to explain the apparent trajectory by means of two bullets.”
Dr. Crenshaw’s account
Charles A. Crenshaw, M.D., one of the physicians attending JFK at Parkland has continued to insist the wound to JFK’s head was a front-entry wound – a story Crenshaw told in his book “JFK: Conspiracy of Silence” that was published in 1992 and republished this year without change under the title, “JFK Has Been Shot: A Parkland Hospital Surgeon Speaks Out.”
Crenshaw wrote:
I walked to the President’s head to get a closer look. His entire right cerebral hemisphere appeared to be gone. It looked like a crater – an empty cavity. All I could see there was mangled, bloody tissue. From the damage I saw, there was no doubt in my mind that the bullet had entered his head through the front, and as it surgically passed through his cranium, the missile obliterated part of the temporal and all the parietal and occipital lobes before it lacerated the cerebellum. The wound resembled a deep furrow in a freshly plowed field. Several years later when I viewed slow-motion films of the bullet striking the President, the physics of the head being thrown back provided final and complete confirmation of a frontal entry by the bullet to the cranium.
The basic logic of gunshot wounds apply: entrance wounds tend to be small, bullet-size holes, as the Parkland Hospital emergency room physicians observed in JFK’s neck wound before the incision was made for the tracheotomy. Exit wounds tend to be larger, such as the grapefruit-sized, gaping wounds the Parkland Hospital emergency room physicians observed in the back of JFK’s head.
Crenshaw’s testimony was so damaging to the Warren Commission’s conclusion that those who maintain Oswald was the lone assassin have attacked him. The American Medical Association claimed in a press conference held in New York City on May 19, 1992, that Crenshaw was not n Parkland Hospital’s Trauma Room One at the time emergency treatment was provided to President Kennedy.
Crenshaw sued the AMA, winning in 1994 an out-of-court monetary settlement that ended the case, substantiating Crenshaw’s claim.
The Warren Commission did not call Crenshaw to testify.
Note: Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact us here.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/rare-zapruder-footage-multiple-jfk-assassins/#IL4524z6YOWTXUIl.99

A FATHER, A DAUGHTER AND A DOG..

A FATHER, A DAUGHTER AND A DOG...
GET THR KLEENX ... REALLY NEAT STORY ...

A Father, a Daughter and a Dog - A true story by Catherine Moore


"Watch out! You nearly broad sided that car!" My father yelled at me. "Can't you do anything right?"

Those words hurt worse than blows. I turned my head toward the elderly man in the seat beside me, daring me to challenge him. A lump rose in my throat as I averted my eyes. I wasn't prepared for another battle.

"I saw the car, Dad. Please don't yell at me when I'm driving."

My voice was measured and steady, sounding far calmer than I really felt.

Dad glared at me, then turned away and settled back. At home I left Dad in front of the television and went outside to collect my thoughts..... dark, heavy clouds hung in the air with a promise of
rain. The rumble of distant thunder seemed to echo my inner turmoil. What could I do about him?

Dad had been a lumberjack in Washington and Oregon. He had enjoyed being outdoors and had reveled in pitting his strength against the forces of nature. He had entered grueling lumberjack competitions, and had placed often. The shelves in his house were filled with trophies that attested to his prowess.

The years marched on relentlessly. The first time he couldn't lift a heavy log, he joked about it; but later that same day I saw him outside alone, straining to lift it. He became irritable whenever
anyone teased him about his advancing age, or when he couldn't do something he had done as a younger man.

Four days after his sixty-seventh birthday, he had a heart attack. An ambulance sped him to the hospital while a paramedic administered CPR to keep blood and oxygen flowing.

At the hospital, Dad was rushed into an operating room. He was lucky; he survived. But something inside Dad died. His zest for life was gone. He obstinately refused to follow doctor's orders. Suggestions and offers of help were turned aside with sarcasm and insults. The number of visitors thinned, then finally stopped altogether. Dad was left alone.

My husband, Dick, and I asked Dad to come live with us on our small farm. We hoped the fresh air and rustic atmosphere would help him adjust.

Within a week after he moved in, I regretted the invitation. It seemed nothing was satisfactory. He criticized everything I did. I became frustrated and moody. Soon I was taking my pent-up anger out on Dick. We began to bicker and argue.

Alarmed, Dick sought out our pastor and explained the situation. The clergyman set up weekly counseling appointments for us. At the close of each session he prayed, asking God to soothe Dad's troubled mind.

But the months wore on and God was silent. Something had to be done and it was up to me to do it.

The next day I sat down with the phone book and methodically called each of the mental health clinics listed in the Yellow Pages. I explained my problem to each of the sympathetic voices that answered in vain.

Just when I was giving up hope, one of the voices suddenly exclaimed, "I just read something that might help you! Let me go get the article...."

I listened as she read. The article described a remarkable study done at a nursing home. All of the patients were under treatment for chronic depression. Yet their attitudes had improved dramatically when they were given responsibility for a dog.

I drove to the animal shelter that afternoon. After I filled out a questionnaire, a uniformed officer led me to the kennels. The odor of disinfectant stung my nostrils as I moved down the row of pens. Each contained five to seven dogs. Long-haired dogs, curly-haired dogs, black dogs, spotted dogs all jumped up, trying to reach me. I studied each one but rejected one after the other for various reasons too big, too small, too much hair. As I neared the last pen a dog in the shadows of the far corner struggled to his feet, walked to the front of the run and sat down. It was a pointer, one of the dog world's aristocrats. But this was a caricature of the breed.

Years had etched his face and muzzle with shades of gray. His hip bones jutted out in lopsided triangles. But it was his eyes that caught and held my attention. Calm and clear, they beheld me unwaveringly.

I pointed to the dog. "Can you tell me about him?" The officer looked, then shook his head in puzzlement. "He's a funny one. Appeared out of nowhere and sat in front of the gate. We brought him in, figuring someone would be right down to claim him. That was two weeks ago and we've heard nothing. His time is up tomorrow." He gestured helplessly.

As the words sank in I turned to the man in horror. "You mean you're going to kill him?"

"Ma'am," he said gently, "that's our policy. We don't have room for every unclaimed dog."

I looked at the pointer again. The calm brown eyes awaited my decision. "I'll take him," I said. I drove home with the dog on the front seat beside me. When I reached the house I honked the horn twice. I was helping my prize out of the car when Dad shuffled onto the front porch... "Ta-da! Look what I got for you, Dad!" I said excitedly.

Dad looked, then wrinkled his face in disgust. "If I had wanted a dog I would have gotten one. And I would have picked out a better specimen than that bag of bones. Keep it! I don't want it." Dad waved his arm scornfully and turned back toward the house.

Anger rose inside me. It squeezed together my throat muscles and pounded into my temples. "You'd better get used to him, Dad. He's staying!"

Dad ignored me.. "Did you hear me, Dad?" I screamed. At those words Dad whirled angrily, his hands clenched at his sides, his eyes narrowed and blazing with hate. We stood glaring at each other like duelists, when suddenly the pointer pulled free from my grasp. He wobbled toward my dad and sat down in front of him. Then slowly, carefully, he raised his paw.

Dad's lower jaw trembled as he stared at the uplifted paw, confusion replaced the anger in his eyes. The pointer waited patiently. Then Dad was on his knees hugging the animal.

It was the beginning of a warm and intimate friendship. Dad named the pointer Cheyenne. Together he and Cheyenne explored the community. They spent long hours walking down dusty lanes. They spent reflective moments on the banks of streams, angling for tasty trout. They even started to attend Sunday services together, Dad sitting in a pew and Cheyenne lying quietly at his feet.

Dad and Cheyenne were inseparable throughout the next three years. Dad's bitterness faded, and he and Cheyenne made many friends. Then late one night I was startled to feel Cheyenne's cold nose burrowing through our bed covers. He had never before come into our bedroom at night. I woke Dick, put on my robe and ran into my father's room. Dad lay in his bed, his face serene. But his spirit had left quietly sometime during the night.


Two days later my shock and grief deepened when I discovered Cheyenne lying dead beside Dad's bed. I wrapped his still form in the rag rug he had slept on. As Dick and I buried him near a favorite fishing hole, I silently thanked the dog for the help he had given me in restoring Dad's peace of mind.

STAGE2OMEGA FORECLOSURE CONFERENCE CALL MONDAY OCTOBER 28,2013

STAGE2OMEGA FORECLOSURE CONFERENCE CALL MONDAY OCTOBER 28,2013


TOPICS WE WILL COVER
1. FORECLOSURE SURPLUS
2. LETTERS TO SEND YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY
3. THE FORECLOSURE FORENSIC AUDIT
4. REDEMPTION OF FORECLOSURE SURPLUS FUNDS FROM CLERK OF COURT
TIME WILL BE ANNOUNCED AND EMAILED
IF YOU HAVE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT FORECLOSURE PROCESS, HAVE LOST A HOME,
ARE FACING PENDING FORECLOSURE, PLEASE JOIN THE CALL
EXO

Visit stage2omega at: http://www.stage2omega.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

Founder of Judicial Watch Calls for a March On D.C. to DWARF the Bikers’ and Truckers’ and DEMAND Obama’s Resignation!

Stop Watching Us rally against mass surveillance: Live Updates - RT USA

Stop Watching Us rally against mass surveillance: Live Updates - RT USA
PEOPLE ARE PO'ED AT WHAT THE NAZI'S ARE DOING TO US.... WE NEED TO BE DOING A LOT MORE OF THIS INCLUDING THE ARRESTS OF THE BASTARD NAZI COMMIE SOCIALIST D/HEADS...


Snowden Leaks Have Tied Corpgov Panties In A Knot.... They Are Warning Allies.."That The Docs Show YOUR Cooperation...

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Snowden Leaks Have Tied Corpgov Panties In A Knot.... They Are Warning Allies.."That The Docs Show YOUR Cooperation...
Posted By: Watchman
Date: Sunday, 27-Oct-2013 11:21:18

U.S. officials are alerting some foreign intelligence services that documents detailing their secret cooperation with the United States have been obtained by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, according to government officials.
Snowden, U.S. officials said, took tens of thousands of military intelligence documents, some of which contain sensitive material about collection programs against adversaries such as Iran, Russia and China. Some refer to operations that in some cases involve countries not publicly allied with the United States.
The revelation about spying on an ally is causing a diplomatic headache for the United States.
The process of informing officials in capital after capital about the risk of disclosure is delicate. In some cases, one part of the cooperating government may know about the collaboration while others — such as the foreign ministry — may not, the officials said. The documents, if disclosed, could compromise operations, officials said.
The notifications come as the Obama administration is scrambling to placate allies after allegations that the NSA has spied on foreign leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The reports have forced the administration to play down operations targeting friends while also attempting to preserve other programs that depend on provisional partners. In either case, trust in the United States may be compromised.
“It is certainly a concern, just as much as the U.S. collection [of information on European allies] being put in the news, if not more, because not only does it mean we have the potential of losing collection, but also of harming relationships,” a congressional aide said.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is handling the job of informing the other intelligence services, the officials said. ODNI declined to comment.
In one case, for instance, the files contain information about a program run from a NATO country against Russia that provides valuable intelligence for the U.S. Air Force and Navy, said one U.S. official, who requested anonymity to discuss an ongoing criminal investigation. Snowden faces theft and espionage charges.
“If the Russians knew about it, it wouldn’t be hard for them to take appropriate measures to put a stop to it,” the official said.
Snowden lifted the documents from a top-secret network run by the Defense Intelligence Agency and used by intelligence arms of the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marines, according to sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
Snowden took 30,000 documents that involve the intelligence work of one of the services, the official said. He gained access to the documents through the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System, or JWICS, for top-secret/sensitive compartmented information, the sources said.
The material in question does not deal with NSA surveillance but primarily with standard intelligence about other countries’ military capabilities, including weapons systems — missiles, ships and jets, the officials say.
Although Snowden obtained a large volume of documents, he is not believed to have shared all of them with journalists, sources say. Moreover, he has stressed to those he has given documents that he does not want harm to result.

U. N. BENGHAZI REPORT AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH FOR OBAMA?

U. N. BENGHAZI REPORT AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH FOR OBAMA?
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 26-Oct-2013 21:40:18
 
U.N. Benghazi report an inconvenient truth for Obama?
State Department assessment ignores attackers' link to Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood
BY AARON KLEIN
JERUSALEM – Is the State Department hiding the involvement in the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack of an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood-linked terrorist group?
A new United Nations report ties perpetrators of the Benghazi attack to the Muhammad Jamal Network, or MJN.
The network and its founder, Egyptian Muhammad Jamal, were designated by Obama’s State Department this month as “specially designated global terrorists” affiliated with al-Qaida.
The designation not only sanctions MJN’s assets but now allows President Obama to use a Bush-era military doctrine to capture Jamal terrorists overseas.
The State Department document designating MJN as terrorists does not mention the Benghazi attack.
This despite an October 2012 Wall Street Journal report that fighters affiliated with Jamal’s group participated in the Benghazi attack.
Aaron Klein’s “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office” is available, autographed, at WND’s Superstore
Earlier this month, The Daily Beast quoted sources confirming MJN’s involvement at Benghazi.
Now a new U.N. Security Council resolution adds MJN to its list of sanctioned al-Qaida groups.
Unlike the State Department description, the U.N. resolution details MJN’s alleged involvement in the attack on the U.S. special mission and nearby CIA annex.
A U.N. narrative summary of the sanctions resolution reads: “Muhammad Jamal set up a training camp in Libya where Libyan and foreign violent extremists were trained. Some of the attackers of the U.S. Mission in Benghazi on 11 September 2012 have been identified as associates of Muhammad Jamal, and some of the Benghazi attackers reportedly trained at MJN camps in Libya.”
Earlier this month, WND quoted informed Middle Eastern security officials saying it was militants from the Muslim Brotherhood who sprang terrorist leader Muhammad Jamal from prison in 2011.
The Muslim Brotherhood connection may serve as further evidence of an Egyptian role in the Benghazi attack.
Also freed from prison in the Brotherhood-led revolution of 2011 was Mohammed al-Zawahiri, the brother of al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.
Mohammed al-Zawahiri was one of the backers of a protest at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo the same day as the Benghazi attack.
The Cairo protest was announced days in advance as part of a movement to free the so-called “blind sheik,” Omar Abdel-Rahman, held in the U.S. over the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
The State Department’s 39-page Accountability Review Board report, or ARB, described a group acting to free Rahman was involved in previous attacks against diplomatic facilities in Benghazi.
Hillary’s Benghazi investigator confirms Egypt link
In a development largely unreported by news media, the State Department’s lead Benghazi investigator, Thomas Pickering, revealed at a House hearing last month there is evidence that an Egyptian organization was behind the attack on the U.S. mission that killed U.S. ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.
In doing so, Pickering may have leaked important classified information at a House hearing on the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack.
Pickering was the author of the State Department’s ARB, which largely absolved then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other top State officials of wrongdoing regarding the Benghazi attack.
At a House Oversight and Government Reform committee hearing on Benghazi last month, Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wy., asked Pickering whether Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood may have been behind the attack.
“Is it true that there’s documentation that the Muslim Brotherhood and operatives from Egypt were involved in the attack?” she asked.
Pickering replied: “Our report indicates that one Egyptian organization which is named in the report was possibly involved. And I am not sure, I think that that’s in the unclassified. I hope it is.”
The unclassified ARB report – reviewed in full by WND – does not name any Egyptian organization as possibly being behind the attack.
The only mention of an Egyptian group in the unclassified ARB is in relation to a May 18, 2012, RPG attack on the Benghazi International Committee of the Red Cross as well as a May 28, 2012, threat issued by the group on social media against the U.S.
The organization named in the ARB is the “Omar Abdurrahman group,” which was demanding the release of the blind sheik,” Omar Abdel-Rahman.
The unclassified ARB names the Egyptian group in a section on previous attacks in Benghazi in the run up to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack. The unclassified ARB does not name the organization as possibly being behind the Benghazi attack.
Egypt’s Morsi behind murder of U.S. ambassador?
Circumstantial evidence possibly links the attack to former Egyptian President Mohammad Morsi’s campaign to free Abdel-Rahman.
The blind sheik’s release has been one of the Morsi’s main foreign policy issues.
In July, several major Arabic newspapers ran with a story, first reported by the Kuwaiti paper Al Rai, quoting a Libyan intelligence report on the Benghazi attack that mentions an alleged connection to Morsi and other prominent Egyptian figures.
The report, prepared by Mahmoud Ibrahim Sharif, director of national security for Libya, is based on purported confessions of some of the jihadists arrested at the scene.
The report states that “among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi; preacher Safwat Hegazi; Saudi businessman Mansour Kadasa, owner of the satellite station Al-Nas; Egyptian Sheik Muhammad Hassan; former presidential candidate, Hazim Salih Abu Ismail.”
Unsubstantiated Arabic-language reports from the Middle East also claimed passport belonging to the alleged killer of Stevens had been recovered at the home of Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood deputy leader Khairat Al-Shater.
Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reportedly visited al-Shater in prison, spending over an hour talking to the Brotherhood leader.
‘Dr. Morsi sent us’
There is other information pointing to Morsi’s possible involvement in the Benghazi attack.
YouTube videos of the attack find some of the jihadists speaking an Egyptian dialect of Arabic, as previously reported by FrongPageMag.
One of the videos shows a jihadist carrying out the attack while stating in an Egyptian dialect, “Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, Dr. Morsi sent us.”
READ THE FULL ARTICLE AND VIEW VIDEOS AT THIS LINK:
http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/u-n-benghazi-report-an-inconvenient-truth-for-obama/




The Trouble With You Humans Is You Are Too Prone To Following 'Leaders'...

The Trouble With You Humans Is You Are Too Prone To Following 'Leaders'...
Posted By: Lion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 26-Oct-2013 20:28:52
----------------
...who only lead you into more trouble.
You follow like sheep.
You won't think for yourself.
The only thing you want to be is someone else.
You're just the blind, blind, blind leading the blind.
From the perspective of an off-Earth being, you humans look silly, to say the least, although an embarrassment to Creation would reflect a better assessment.
As Human Beings, you have more potential in your DNA than MOST - yet you waste your greatest gifts on denigrating yourself, your planet, and the future of your race - which is in the eyes of your children.
What is wrong with you?
How can you possibly CHOOSE to follow reprobates who despise you - and allow them to control you - as opposed to living in the fullness of your own potential?
Why do you allow entities from TWO DIMENSIONS LOWER than your own to dictate your lives?
You have become lazy, lethargic, and void of common sense.
You have evolved into lower life forms, who are, in reality, more animal than human.
Is there a reason WHY you should NOT be destined to graze like mindless cattle in the fields?
You are so superficial that even your best and brightest are second rate at best.
We cannot help those who are not willing to help themselves.
You use fear as a crutch for inaction.
Are you so weak and inept that someone else's fear mongering is your guiding light?
Throughout your history, we have sent you messenger after messenger to show you the Light.
What did you do with these messengers?
You killed them. You imprisoned them. You destroyed them.
Now, you are doing the same thing to YOURSELF?
To your OWN CHILDREN?
What IS wrong with you?
Do you WANT to DESTROY yourselves?
Do you WISH to destroy your home planet?
The problem with allowing you selfish, inconsiderate, lazy, shallow, self-serving Humans to destroy yourselves, and destroy your planet, is that everything in the Universe is connected.
What you do to yourselves, and to planet Earth, creates ripples in the fabric of Creation that never end.
We cannot allow this destruction to happen, no matter how much you inept fools who refer to yourselves as 'Human' desire it to be so.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
-Leonardo da Vinci
The Complete and Undeniable Truth - Larken Rose
http://youtu.be/_5mZ5FBHg0A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_5mZ5FBHg0A
Published on Aug 1, 2012 By Liberty Evolution
The speech in this video is an excerpt of the novel 'The Iron Web' by Larken Rose.
----------------------
Wake Up! Because it's time...
http://youtu.be/kKyH7kQw6GA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKyH7kQw6GA
Published on Sep 10, 2013 By Wake Up! Message
Wake Up! Message...
If we like it or not, there is corruption, suppression, control and lies, out there, and we need to say STOP, and no longer just accept it all, or ignore it!
All of us that help and support Wake Up Message, invite you to feel free to share, copy and, spread anything you like of our own works!
The only thing we ask you, is to tell us about it, and who knows, maybe we can even help share and spread your message too!
Love, to all those that can receive it!
Special Thanks & Mention for Inspiration, Support and just doing...
-----------------------
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=290488


SECURITY CONSULTANT HECKLES NSA HEAD: SHOUTS "FREEDOM !"; "READ THE CONSTITUTION !"

SECURITY CONSULTANT HECKLES NSA HEAD: SHOUTS "FREEDOM !"; "READ THE CONSTITUTION !"
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 26-Oct-2013 17:28:13

Security Consultant Heckles NSA Head: Shouts “Freedom!”; “Read The Constitution!”
Vatic Note: Damn, its nice to know we still have men of courage and integrity still in positions of authority when you need them. Good for this Jon McCoy, a security consultant. He chose integrity over money. Wow, we are on the road to awareness and recovery. The only terrorists out there are working for the Khazar bankers, the US government, Britain, Saudi's, Israel, and Germany.
So its a lie when this general head of NSA says they stopped 13 terrorist attacks. What liars. He must be an Illuminati child, since they are usually put in charge of various key Depts. The Illums would never trust a Goyim in key positions as they have said so many times. That is why Obama purged 9 of them out of the pentagon and notice, General Alexander was not one of them. That means he has bought the party line.
READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT THIS LINK: 3 videos on the site below !!!
http://vaticproject.blogspot.com/2013/10/security-consultant-heckles-nsa-head.html