Did Obama know date of Mandela’s death was June 26, 2013?

Did Obama know date of Mandela’s death was June 26, 2013? http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/59749

It’s reasonable to wonder how many Western leaders in South Africa for Mandela’s memorial today have been keeping their tears of grief in check since June
Did Obama know date of Mandela’s death was June 26, 2013?

Did Obama know date of Mandela’s death was June 26, 2013?

By Judi McLeod (Bio and Archives)  Tuesday, December 10, 2013

President Barack Obama may have already known the real date of Nelson Mandela’s death and studiously planned funeral when he made his June 2013 African trip—and was even able to take the photo he would later Tweet on the day of Mandela’s officially announced death while he was still in South Africa.
Claiming to defer to Mandela family members on visiting the ailing Mandela during his June 28-30 whistle-stop trip through Johannesburg, Obama instead met with South African President Jacob Zuma. 
Zuma was one of the key figures who kept the news that doctors had been keeping Mandela alive in a vegetative state, a top world secret.
Among thousands of news outlets, only one newspaper made a valiant attempt to get the true story out and keep it there.
According to the read-by-millions Las Vegas Guardian Express, Mandela died on June 26th, 2013, but was kept on life support until December 2013.
On December 5,  2013, the White House tweeted a picture showing Obama behind the bars of the Robben Island prison, where Mandela had been incarcerated for 27 years.  The picture tweeted on Dec. 5, 2013 had been taken on June 29, 2013, when Barack and Michelle Obama visited the world famous site.
As president and first lady of the USA,  the Obamas make pretty good vultures.
This is the story of Mandela’s June 26 death following his persistent vegetative state as reported by the Guardian Express:
“On the morning of June 26, we received a message from one of our South African correspondents, Laura Oneale that Nelson Mandela had passed away the previous evening. The news had come to her in the form of a text message from an acquaintance who was well-placed in the South African media. It should be understood that this organization was not authorized to break the news. Clearly, the South African government and the Mandela family had already decided that the news would not be made public. Undoubtedly, this decision had been made even before his death; at least, that’s what we were thinking.
“Our assumption, at the time, was two-fold: firstly, we doubted that such news would not long escape the attention of the international media, even if the South African media was being muzzled. As is the nature of the news media industry, we saw that we had been handed a major scoop and that our window of opportunity to be the first to break this news was limited. Cynical? Perhaps, but we did not doubt the integrity of the source, given that individual’s position. We are in the news business. What other publication – given the gravity of the story and the knowledge of Mandela’s health condition – would not have immediately prepared to publish? We began both to work on a couple of articles and to seek out verification. We found no other corroborating evidence. We wrote our stories.
“In the interests of being completely honest, we cannot say that we did not second–guess ourselves. Did we have direct, first-hand proof that Nelson Mandela was dead? No, we didn’t. One must look at how news stories are broken, though: A media publication receives information from a trusted source; every good faith attempt is made to verify the information. In the absence of verification, the editor or editorial team must make a decision to publish or not to publish. What we did have was the best source we could have, other than first-hand, eye-witness testimony. Moreover, Mandela was seriously ill; according to reports, the icon and former African leader was on his deathbed; hooked up to medical devices that enabled him to breathe.
“We published.
“Now, we were walking on eggshells; our reputation was at stake. What were we thinking? Other news outlets actually published stories announcing Mandela’s death; they quickly retracted, without actually justifying why they had done so. To us, that in itself indicated that they had been told to retract, rather than doing so because they had discovered that Mandela was still alive. The Las Vegas Guardian Express, however, was a relatively new and completely independent publication with no government ties and no corporate owners or shareholders. We could not be pressured into retracting, other than through legal action. In addition, we were a tiny speck on the world news radar.
“Naturally, it was in our own interests to quickly verify Mandela’s condition. Is that an admission that we published news of his death without being sure? No, it is not; we were sure and we could clearly see that an official announcement could be kept under wraps for any number of reasons; a visit by US President Barack Obama was already scheduled and there were obvious security implications. Additionally, the South African government is absolutely capable of using such news for political purposes. Our only misgiving was that we had failed to uncover any corroborating source. The strength of our conviction is proven by the fact that, even as the days went by and no word of his death came from official or family sources, we maintained our position. It seemed logical enough that there was no reason to retract without absolute proof that Nelson Mandela still lived.
“As the few articles we published drew attention – along with numerous comments – it became self-evident that both the South African government and the Mandela family were aware of our reports. Had we been wrong – and had the family been able to prove that Mandela was still alive – it is beyond doubt that the Las Vegas Guardian Express would have received some form of legal threat. Not only did such action never transpire, but our publication was subjected to cyber-attack: Denial of Service attacks, originating in South Africa, disabled our site on more than one occasion. We took this as proof that we were reporting something that the South African government did not want us to report.
“It should be remembered that our publication was relatively small and generated only modest revenue through advertising. Nevertheless – and at considerable expense – we dispatched a senior editor to South Africa. During his time there, Michael Smith uncovered intriguing details of the situation regarding Nelson Mandela, the family, the African National Congress and South African President Jacob Zuma. Our investigations opened a door into the corruption and dishonesty of the aforementioned parties. During a Mandela family legal battle, documents emerged which stated that doctors had advised the family to turn off Mandela’s life support as he was brain-dead. At a later point, Zuma made a statement denying this, but we noted carefully that, while other news organizations were reporting that the doctors themselves had retracted their claims that Mandela was brain-dead, no such retraction had been made; Zuma himself claimed that the doctors had retracted this assertion.
“Now that it has been officially announced that Nelson Mandela has passed away, our position on the matter has not changed in any way. Inevitably, his passing had to be revealed. Many of our South African readers have believed us from the start; those that have criticized us have presented not one shred of evidence that we were wrong. The idea that we are proven wrong because the official announcement comes only now is absurd.
“This article has not detailed every piece of evidence that fell into place during our investigation into why Nelson Mandela’s death was covered up. One of the most compelling discoveries was brought back from South Africa by Michael Smith: He returned with an audio tape of a recorded telephone conversation Between a South African Defense Force officer and a private security contractor. The audio can be found in the first of the links listed at the foot of this article. For the reader who wishes to get the full story of our reporting on this story, each of those articles listed provide, collectively, the complete picture. During the call, the officer details the circumstances of Mandela’s death – which, according to him, occurred even earlier than we reported – and the possible implications of it, as well as the Mandela family’s motives for not releasing the news.
“Even now, the South African government, it seems, is attempting to prevent the Las Vegas Guardian Express from revealing the truth to the people of South Africa. Our Facebook page received a telling comment today. The comment reads:
Hallo
I am from South Africa and for some reason I cannot view your website or any articles regarding Nelson Mandela. Is it possible that your site being blocked by our country?
could you kindly send the the articles you recently wrote.
Kind regards
“Nelson Mandela is now officially dead – but he was already dead. Nothing has transpired between our initial June 26 reports and the present time to prove otherwise.
“Nevertheless, we would be remiss if we did not convey to the South African people, that we have the utmost respect for Madiba and the great legacy he has left the world. However, as a publication, read by millions across the globe, we have an obligation and responsibility to report the truth and what we were thinking.”
On the White House.gov website, the itinerary for Michelle Obama’s June African trip is still online.  The links from her page to Barack Obama’s page with information of the South African trip produce an error advising viewers that the page they’re looking for can’t be found.

It would take six months or more to plan a state funeral that would be the biggest since Winston Churchill’s.
It’s reasonable to wonder how many Western leaders in South Africa for Mandela’s memorial today have been keeping their tears of grief in check since June, 2013.
Was this week’s grief-stricken Obama let in on Mandela’s June 2013 death by family or the African National Congress (ANC) South African government when he was in South Africa June 28-30?
Or did Obama know they were keeping Mandela alive on life support courtesy of the international spying NSA?
Meanwhile, in a world where the mainstream media feeds government lies and propaganda to readers, listeners and viewers,  the courageous Las Vegas Guardian Express stands alone.
Resources:
Guardian Express: Mandela Dead or Alive
Guardian Express Nelson Mandela Cover Up Timeline

4 Comments
Copyright © Canada Free Press

RSS Feed for Judi McLeod

Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck.

Judi can be emailed at: judi@canadafreepress.com

  

Federal reserve notes Are Not Legal Tender

Federal reserve notes Are Not Legal Tender (HJR-192 Repealed 1982)

As of October 27, 1977 legal tender is no longer required and repayment need only be made in equivalent kind; A negotiable instrument. Fidelity Bank Guarantee Trust of New York v Henwood, 307 U.S. 847 (1939). Public Law 95-147.

IN KIND defined: Of the same species or category. In the same kind, class, or genus. A loan is returned "in kind" when not the identical article, but one corresponding and equivalent to it, is given to the lender. See Distribution in kind; In genere; Like-kind exchange.

ALL Federal reserve/Federal Reserve notes Are Without Authority Of Law.

Whereas defined pursuant to section one of HJR-192 “Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under the United States, is hereby repealed.”

Whereas defined pursuant to section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act the Federal reserve notes issued pursuant to section 16 were expressly said to be obligations of the United States. In June of 1933 the authority to issue those section 16 Federal reserve notes was repealed! Resulting with ALL Federal reserve/Federal Reserve notes are without authority of law.

Integrity defined: As used in statutes prescribing the qualifications of public officers, trustees, etc., this term means soundness or moral principle and character, as shown by one person dealing with others in the making and performance of contracts, and fidelity and honesty in the discharge of trusts; it is synonymous with "probity," "honesty," and "uprightness."

BANK HOLIDAY OF 1933 defined: see; http://www.scribd.com/doc/179548063/Common-Law-Trust-Bank-Holiday-of-1933-Defined-Public-Notice-Public-Record

"Good faith" means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing.

In Bankruptcy all debts are discharged

"Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors." Matthew 6:12.

For full disclosure Please See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/191127862/Federal-Reserve-Notes-Are-Not-Legal-Tender-HJR-192-Repealed-1982

What if they left.....AND ENTERED LEGALLY?

  

What if they left.....AND ENTERED LEGALLY?  Somebody really did their homework on this one.  Best on the subject to present date. What if 20 Million Illegal Aliens Vacated America? I, Tina Griego, journalist for the Denver Rocky Mountain News wrote a column titled, "Mexican Visitor's Lament". I interviewed Mexican journalist Evangelina Hernandez while visiting Denver last week.  Hernandez said,  "Illegal Aliens pay rent, buy groceries, buy clothes.  What Happens to your country's economy if 20 million people go away?"  Hmmm, I thought, what would happen?   So I did my due diligence, buried my nose as a reporter into the FACTS I found below. It's a good question it deserves an honest answer.  Over 80% of Americans demand secured borders and illegal migration stopped.  But what would happen if all 20 million or more vacated America?  The answers I found may surprise you!   In California, if 3.5 million illegal aliens moved back to Mexico, it would leave an extra $10.2 billion to spend on overloaded school systems, bankrupt hospitals and overrun prisons.  It would leave highways cleaner, safer and less congested.  Everyone could understand one another as English became the dominant language again. In Colorado, 500,000 illegal migrants, plus their 300,000 kids and grandchildren would move back 'home', mostly to Mexico.  That would save Colorado an estimated $2 billion (other experts say $7 billion) annually in taxes that pay for schooling, medical, social-services and incarceration costs.  It means 12,000 gang members would vanish out of Denver alone.   Colorado would save more than $20 million in prison costs, and the terror that those 7,300 alien criminals set upon local citizens.  Denver Officer Don Young and hundreds of Colorado victims wouldn't have suffered death, accidents, rapes, other crimes by illegals.   Denver Public Schools would not suffer a 67% dropout/flunk rate because of thousands of illegal alien students speaking 41different languages... At least 200,000 vehicles would vanish from our grid locked cities in Colorado.  Denver's 4% unemployment rate would vanish as our working poor would gain jobs at a living wage.   In Florida, 1.5 million illegals would return the Sunshine State back to America, the rule of law, and English.   In Chicago, Illinois, 2.1 million illegals would free up hospitals, schools, prisons and highways for a safer, cleaner and more crime-free experience.   If 20 million illegal aliens returned 'home', the U.S. Economy would return to the rule of law.  Employers would hire legal American citizens at a living wage.  Everyone would pay the fair share of taxes because they wouldn't be working off the books.  That would result in an additional $401 Billion in IRS income taxes collected annually, and an equal amount for local, state and city coffers.    No more push '1' for Spanish or '2' for English.  No more confusion in American schools that now must contend with over 100 languages that degrade the educational system for American kids.  Our overcrowded schools would lose more than two million illegal alien kids at a cost of billions in ESL and free breakfasts and lunches.   We would lose 500,000 illegal criminal alien inmates at a cost of more than $1.6 billion annually.  That includes 15,000 MS-13 gang members who distribute $130 billion in drugs annually would vacate our country.    In cities like L.A., 20,000 members of the '18th Street Gang' would vanish from our nation.  No more Mexican forgery gangs for ID theft from Americans!  No more foreign rapists and child molesters!   Losing more than 20 million people would clear up our crowded highways and gridlock.  Cleaner air and less drinking and driving American deaths by illegal aliens!   America's economy is drained.  Taxpayers are harmed.  Employers get rich.  Over $80 billion annually wouldn't return to the aliens' home countries by cash transfers. Illegal migrants earned half that money untaxed, which further drains America's economy which currently suffers an $15 trillion debt. $15 trillion debt !!   At least 400,000 anchor babies would not be born in our country, costing us $109 billion per year per cycle.  At least 86 hospitals in California, Georgia and Florida would still be operating instead of being bankrupt out of existence because illegals pay nothing via the EMTOLA Act.  Americans wouldn't suffer thousands of TB and hepatitis cases rampant in our country-brought in by illegals unscreened at our borders.   Our cities would see 20 million less people driving, polluting and grid locking our cities.  It would also put the 'progressives' on the horns of a dilemma; illegal aliens and their families cause 11% of our greenhouse gases.   Over one million of Mexico's poorest citizens now live inside and along our border from Brownsville, Texas to San Diego, California in what the New York Times called, 'colonias' or new neighborhoods.  Trouble is, those living areas resemble Bombay and Calcutta where grinding poverty, filth, diseases, drugs, crimes, no sanitation and worse.  They live without sewage, clean water, streets, roads, electricity, or any kind of sanitation.   The New York Times reported them to be America's new 'Third World ' inside our own country.  Within 20 years, at their current growth rate, they expect 20 million residents of those colonias.  (I've seen them personally in Texas and Arizona; it's sickening beyond anything you can imagine.)   By enforcing our laws, we could repatriate them back to Mexico.  We should invite 20 million legal aliens to go home, fix their own countries and/or make a better life in Mexico.  We already invite a million people into our country legally more than all other countries combined annually.  We cannot and must not allow anarchy at our borders, more anarchy within our borders and growing lawlessness at every level in our nation.     It's time to stand up for our country, our culture, our civilization and our way of life.  Interesting Statistics!    Here are 13 reasons illegal aliens should vacate America, and I hope they are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them: 1.    $14 billion to $22 billion dollars are spent each year on welfare to illegal aliens. (that's Billion with a B')  http://tinyurl.com/zob77..html 2.    $7.5 billion dollars are spent each year on Medicaid for legal aliens  http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html 3.     $12 billion dollars are spent each year on primary and secondary school education for children here illegallyand they still cannot speak a word of English! http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 4.     $27 billion dollars are spent each year for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens known as anchor babies. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 5.     $3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens That's $1.2 Billion a year. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 6.     28% percent of all federal prison inmates are illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 7.     $190 billion dollars are spent each year on illegal aliens for welfare & social services by the American taxpayers. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0610/29/ldt.01.html 8.     $200 billion dollars per year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 9.     The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of White non-legal aliens.  In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the U.S. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt.01.html 10.  During the year 2005, there were 8 to 10 MILLION legal aliens that crossed our southern border with as many as 19,500 legal aliens from other terrorist countries.  Over 10,000 of those were middle-easternterrorists.  Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin, crack, guns, and marijuana crossed into the U.S. from the southern border. http://tinyurl.com/t9sht 11.  The National Policy Institute, estimates that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion, or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period and nbsp; http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation 12.  In 2006, legal aliens sent home $65 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin, to their families and friends. http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm 13.  The dark side of illegal immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes are committed by illegal immigrants in the United States!  http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml  TOTAL COST, a whopping, $538.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR! If this doesn't bother YOU, then just delete the message.... Otherwise send it on to your congresspersons and all the folks you know.

Loretta Fuddy killed in plane crash

Press Release: Within hours after Attorney Orly Taitz published a press release of Johanna Ah’Nee-Randolph’s “control” birth certificate showing the same evidence of forgery and backdating as Obama’s alleged birth certificate, which was certified as genuine by director of Health of HI Loretta Fuddy, it was announced that Loretta Fuddy was the only passenger to die in a small plane accident. Attorney Taitz calls on 8 courts and judges who received her cases to rule expeditiously on the merits and review the evidence of forgery and theft in Obama’s IDs before more people die in strange accidents

Posted on | December 12, 2013 | 10 Comments
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=442421

Riots... Singapore, Thailand, Italy, Greece, India, Etc.... Are You Ready For When They Hit Home??

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Riots... Singapore, Thailand, Italy, Greece, India, Etc.... Are You Ready For When They Hit Home??

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Thursday, 12-Dec-2013 09:17:29

Editor’s Note: With America’s middle class being destroyed on a daily basis, and low wage workers seeing reduced hours and experiencing more difficulty with making ends meet, it is only a matter of time before people snap. We may think we live in a stable society, but as Daniel Ameduri of Future Money Trends points out below, no country is immune to civil unrest when the right conditions are met. And if you’ve been paying attention, it’s not that much of a stretch of the imagination to suggest the signs of discontent are starting to appear from sea to shining sea. As the situation continues to degrade in the United States we, too, will experience rioting and civil unrest, something the U.S. government has been actively preparing for. In the very near future, riots won’t just be some far-off event you watch on television from the comfort of your couch… They’ll be front and center, right outside your front door. This article first appeared in the Future Money Trends Weekly Wealth Digest This past weekend a country with one of the highest living standards in the world saw rioting in the streets! According to Credit Suisse, Singapore ranks 8th in the world in terms of personal wealth. Since the year 2000, Singaporeans’ wealth has more than doubled. It is clear that this is a very prosperous city state that is the gem of Asia. I know that when I have looked for offshore gold storage in the past, Singapore comes up as one of the top areas along with Hong Kong, Zuric, Perth, and Toronto. However, on Sunday a riot was sparked in Singapore, the first one in more than 40 years. Long story short, an Indian national was struck by a bus and killed, the surrounding neighborhood went out by the hundreds to set fire to at least 6 police cars and the ambulance that responded to the young man who died. singapore-riots Now I don’t know every detail of race relations in Singapore, but I do know from what I have read that about 25% of the workers are transient workers, the city state is made up of immigrants, of which about 8% are Indian. The reason I bring this up is because sometimes just like an individual who snaps, so can a large group. ZeroHedge.com in their coverage of the incident titled their blog post, “Riots Break Out In Singapore; Think Your Country Is Immune?” This is definitely something to think about living in the United States. Many people think that the U.S. is safe from mass riots across the country due to economic civil unrest, but I don’t think anyone should rule out widespread rioting in the streets. America is like a pressure cooker as my friend Doug Casey has often noted. We have 49% of the population not paying taxes, 23% of the population not only not paying taxes, but being paid to live here in the U.S. No matter what you believe or how much money you have, our health care system is screwed up. Our welfare and warfare state is robbing the middle class, and the entitlement ponzi-schemes are robbing our young of opportunity. A lot of these thoughts and more are weighing on Americans, will they snap one day and take their grievances to the street? I think there is a good chance during this depression, with nearly 48 million people on government food stamps, long term unemployment near records, and real unemployment closer to 20%, anger and frustration is building up. A recent poll by ABC News and the Washington Post revealed that the dissatisfaction with the U.S. government was at 80%. There are a lot of legitimate grievances that can add a lot of pressure to people who are barely making it or who are literally sliding out of the middle class and into poverty. I for one am very tired and extremely annoyed over all the fraud and waste I see on a daily basis. From the U.S. getting involved in everyones’ business around the world, to me paying taxes only to see millions of people cash out on MY money so they can live a lazy lifestyle. A welfare mom in New York for instance revealed that she collects just over $38,000 a year, this is more than the starting salary of a teacher in the state. Although the actual welfare queen state is Hawaii, where a person with two children can receive up to $60,590 per year in benefits. Then we have the government workers…Not even going to go there. My point in all of this is prudence, be prepared, especially now as the depression drags on destroying what was left of America’s middle class. Daniel Ameduri is the President of Future Money Trends. He is the producer of some of the most informative and viral videos about the financial crisis, coming trends, and strategies you can implement to shield yourself from economic disaster. You can follow more of Daniel’s commentary, analysis, and recommendations by subscribing to his free weekly Future Money Trends Digest or his premium Smart Money report. - See more at: http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/are-you-ready-for-riots_12112013#sthash.WxnHmHdv.dpuf

Think Hillary Is The Most Dangerous Woman In America?? Nope: She Can't Hold A Candle To Valerie Jarrett...

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Think Hillary Is The Most Dangerous Woman In America?? Nope: She Can't Hold A Candle To Valerie Jarrett...

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Thursday, 12-Dec-2013 09:22:55

The Common Sense Show – by Dave Hodges Most of you know the look you get when you honestly try and convince a member of the “Sheeple Nation” that America is on life support and that tens of millions are in grave danger. Along these lines, I was recently speaking with a friend of mine from Tennessee and began to point out how bad things in this country have become. Inevitably, the discussion began to center around the subject of unwarranted detention centers, such as the ones I have identified on this site, including NFL stadiums, NBA and NHL arenas and shopping malls. And I added that this is on top of the fact that the US already houses two million inmates, mostly for private profit through the CCA. I told him that DHS had signed agreements with all of these entities so that Americans could be detained without due process. My friend rolled his eyes and repeated the national anthem of all sheep, “I didn’t know you were one of them conspiracy theorists”. He couldn’t hold back the laughter. Subsequently, I spent 30 minutes showing him the following evidence, in its raw form, and he then he became visibly shaken. Americans do not live in an emerging police state; all Americans now live in a fully developed police state. From a false flag event, 9/11, to the development of the most complete police state apparatus the world has ever seen, one has to wonder what’s the “endgame”? In a recent article, I investigated the question as to whether Obama possessed the personality traits necessary to carry out heinous acts against the American people. Given the fact that the President could quite easily be judged to have Antisocial Personality Disorder (e.g. formerly psychopath and sociopath), Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Paranoid Personality Disorder, the answer is, yes. Obama could be counted to carry out such orders. Who is the likely conduit between Obama and the real source of power in this country? Obama has had so much movement in his cabinet, the only person who could be considered to be Obama’s handler would be Valerie Jarrett. And when one takes a look at Jarrett, she sends chills down my back. Valerie Jarrett Reveals An End Game Agenda It was shocking when President George W. Bush stated “you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists.” Senior White House Adviser, Valerie Jarrett, has taken these words to a significantly more dramatic level when she stated that “there will be hell to pay” for Obama’s critics in the second term”. To be more specific, Jarrett said, “After we win this election, it is payback time. For those who supported us, there will be rewards, for the ones who opposed us, they will get what they deserve. There will be hell to pay. Congress won’t be a problem for us this time. With no election to worry about, we have two judges ready to go.” These are prophetic words and they constitute a threat to any American who does not support the banksters takeover of the country. Valerie Jarrett Is a Stalinist Jarrett’s family comes from communist leanings. Her family intermarried with the Bill Ayers family. Yes, that would be the Weathermen Underground terrorist leader, Bill Ayers. That would be the same Bill Ayers who told FBI informant, the late Larry Grathwohl, “that when we take over the United States, we will forcibly detain 50 million Americans in re-education camps in which they will probably have to murder 25 million American citizens who cannot be re-educated.” Grathwohl repeated the Ayers statement on the August 18, 2012 edition ofThe Common Sense Show. This is the same Valerie Jarrett family which was also involved with Frank Davis the former head of the Communist Party in the United States. This is the same Frank Davis who Joel Gilbert exposed as Obama’s real father. Additionally, the Jarrett family is also affiliated with other so-called “Red Diaper Babies” in which this young group of intellectual elites called for a communist takeover of the United States in the late 1960′s and early 1970′s. For those that know their history, you will remember that the same people engage in terrorist acts involving the detonation of explosive devices in which people died, including a San Francisco police officer. Bill Ayers wife, Bernardine Dorne served a prison term for her participation with this group. And we also know, that Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorne, close friends of Jarrett to this day, funded President Obama’s Harvard education funded . These facts are representative of the reasons related to why many believe that Valerie Jarrett is making the major decisions in the White House. Therefore, it would be prudent to take a look at Jarrett, herself, to determine the direction of the country and the fate of the people in this country. Jarrett Is Highly Paranoid Jarrett would have no trouble viewing the bulk of the American people as an enemy which must be dealt with because she is so highly paranoid. Jarrett’s extreme paranoid ideation, she seems predisposed to seing racism in the wallpaper of a room. While serving as the Department of Planning and Development Commissioner for the City of Chicago, Jarrett once harassed a white business owner for not paying sufficient deference, in print, to the memory of the city’s first black mayor in the mid-1990′s. As Ellie Monty was actually one of the two white owners of the small firm targeted by Jarrett on this issue. Monty described the event as a contrived racial incident in which Jarrett was using fake racial issues to make a name for herself as a reformer in the same exact fashion as did Obama when he was a community activist. I believe in modern day parlance, this attack on Monty would be referred to as a false flag event and we know that the Obama Administration is no stranger to the topic of false flag attacks. And speaking of wallpaper, there is absolute proof that Jarrett was a vicious slum lord and took advantage of the poverty-stricken black people that she seemingly worked so hard to defend as a reformer. Jarrett Is An Extreme Narcissist Jarrett has consistently acted with a stunning amount of depraved indifference toward her fellow human beings. Valerie Jarrett is indeed both a criminal and a human rights violator. She has participated in abusing large numbers of impoverished black citizens and her actions have contributed to these poor souls living in a squalor befitting the worst of a third world country as she became one of America’s most notorious slum lords. Unfortunately, Jarrett’s slum lord actions took place in Chicago, not in a third world country. Jarrett performed her misdeeds in former State Senator Obama’s Senatorial district in which the future president secured federal funding for Jarrett’s slum housing project. Jarrett’s political record in Chicago was nothing to be proud about. Jarrett, already was known for her corruption and incompetence, when she was eventually fired by Mayor Daley after a scandal erupted over her role in misuse of public funds in the city’s substandard public housing. In other words, a known political criminal found it necessary to fire a criminal because Jarrett was too extreme, even for Mayor Daley. Jarrett was the former CEO of Habitat Co., which managed Grove Parc Plaza beginning in 2001 and continued through the time that she served as a member of Obama’s presidential campaign finance committee, until the federally subsidized Chicago complex was seized by the federal government after inspectors found the conditions to unlivable. Please allow me to pause and ask a question. How does a woman, fired by a corrupt mayor for corruption and busted by the federal government for absconding with federal housing funds while maintaining an apartment complex under the most horrific of conditions, get to be the President’s most trusted adviser? Jarrett’s past actions are indicative of an individual who would not hesitate to act with extreme malice toward a country who is beginning to believe that this administration is the most dangerous administration in American History. Does my mental health expertise allow me to make the professional judgment that both Jarrett and Obama would ever make the call to carry out the wishes of Bill Ayers, with regard to detentions and exterminations? Without question, this is the case. If you do not think so, ask yourself this question, .. see the rest: http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/the-most-dangerous-woman-in-america/68582#more-68582

HERE IS WHAT WE CAN DO

HELLO JOHN AND ALL, HERE IS WHAT WE CAN DO. ITS TIME TO GO AFTER THESE BOZO'S.

This video about filing a claim against the public official's BOND.  This is a way for a private citizen (who feels he has been wronged) can by-pass the so-called "legal system" and go directly to the Insurance company which bonds the official.
Once an official has had a claim filed against them... they are done! They can't work until the claim is settled, and if they lose, they will never work in a government capacity again because they will be a high risk to insurance companies.  This is the one thing public officials FEAR the most, because it is out of their control.  You can file a claim for ($$$$$$$) against their bond for violating your rights, etc.  Below is the law regarding bonding regulations relating to District Attorneys, Judges, etc.  Also, I have discovered a video about how officials are now "Hiding" their bonds, to keep citizens from filing claims on them.  The video is kind of slow, but listen to it a few times and comprehend what is happening.  I would assume that if any official learned that their bond was in jeopardy, they would get their act together and maybe even drop the case (?), or at least back off.
Here is the video link > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0BThl020gs


Below is the CODE
 The Uniform Bonding Code - (UBC)
 5.2 -- Bonding of District Attorneys
   A city, county, state or federal district attorney (including a U.S. district attorney called a "U.S. Attorney') shall lose his bonding and shall not be bonded:
 1.      if he refuses to properly identify himself to the citizen when asked to do so, including giving the citizen the name and address (or telephone number) of his bonding company and his bond policy number (bond number),
2.      if he fails or refuses to receive, for filing, a criminal complaint from a citizen against a citizen or an official,
3.      if he refused to mark or stamp the citizen's confirmed (compare with original) copy of the citizen's complaint with any of the following
A.     "Received"
B.     name of receiving office
C.     date
D.     time
E.      signature or initial of receiving clerk or official, so that the citizen can have an official receipt for delivery of his complaint;
4.      if he fails or refuses to make a reasonably diligent effort to process the citizen's complaint (42 USC 1986),
5.      if he fails or refuses to see to it that the citizen's complaint is placed in the right hands for processing and/or answering, (return)
6.      if he does not make every effort to make sure that the complaining party knows of the status or location of the complaint in the legal system, and does not give the complainant written notice of the same when it is possible.

5.3 - The Bonding of Prosecuting Attorneys
 A prosecuting attorney shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable:
 1.      if he refuses to prosecute a complaint when it is possible to do so, regardless of whom the complaint is against,
2.      if he resorts to "selective prosecution," i.e., any excuse of immunity for an official in order to protect a malfeasant official from prosecution,
3.      if he resorts to "selective prosecution,"i.e., false or malicious prosecution of a citizen, in order to punish or destroy a citizen for attempting to have a malfeasant official prosecuted.
 5.4 - Bonding of Judges
    A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable:
1.      if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of any citizen appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen appearing in any court of the county in which he works whose case may come to his attention 12y a means.
 5.5 - Bonding of Attorneys
    A lawyer or an attorney shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable,:
 if he fails to protect the remedies of due process and the equal protection of the law of either his client or of the adverse party in an action. In an adversary system of law, each lawyer or attorney shall protect the representation of fact not only for their own party, but shall protect the legal process for both parties without, exception.

TNT

TNT:

[loechin] We have to look at facts guys. You know that stop hanging on calls gurus and what is posted and look at facts

[goldstandard] loechin can you tell us what the facts are?

[okrocks] loechin ok, what are the facts?

[loechin] On Dec 28 Iraq becomes a member of the WTO and to do so must have an international currency. Fourteen days prior to that the currency must be tradeable. Hint do the math

[kogarris] loechin thank you Loechn.. I had already determined that this am. ....the 15th is the deadline!!!.. RIGHT

[lizardlips] loechin The 14 day window ahead of the WTO is around the 15th... and for us Saturday...

 [brownbear] loechin : Ahhhhhh, It is all clear now. Very simple when you know the facts! Thank you!

[loechin] All I'm saying is look at hard facts guys

[loechin] Intel does not always add up so follow the facts as we know them

[loechin] OK someone can say its tonight then if it does not happen everyone is down but if we look at something that is news then we have something that can be factual

[okrocks] from now til the 14th so there you go...

thevazrpb] Everyone on this ride should know by now that not all of the rules apply to this game... seems that they make rules and ignore rules as needed... proof in point,,,Iraq is now trading in county at $3.44 and it is not posted on the cbi website ... or anywhere else... my guess is they can allow them to joint wto at any time after they have a tradable currency... even if it's one day prior ... jmo

[okrocks] OK the 29th is when they meet with WTO so the 28th is the last day before they meet... they have to be tradeable at LEAST for 14 days prior... does not mean they have to wait until the 14th can be any day before then... then add in the US/IMF power and the fact they are going on vacation come Friday... the stress is on these last hours to get this done NOW...

[goldstandard] Well if what Loechin says is true, it gives us nine whole days to shop for whatever is left on the shelves in stores. Whoooo whooooo.