CHECK THIS OUT - FILING AGAINST THE CABAL

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case Number:  CV-S-01-0714-PMP-PAL

Filed This Date:  September 18, 2001

Stewart A. Webb,

And in behalf of

Amanda Melia Webb

Plaintiff's Minor Daughter,

And in behalf of

The People Of The United States of America

And the United States Government.

(702) 362-9567

P.O.Box 31052

Las Vegas, Nevada 89173-1052

Plaintiffs,

Vs.

Kerre Sue Millman (Co-Conspirator /Plaintiff's ex-wife and Attempted Murderer of Plaintiff's Daughter Amanda Melia Webb)

Leonard Yale Millman (Co-Conspirator Bush Crime Family Money Launder/Kingpin/Scamster/Terrorist "The Denver Connection")

(Note: wwwalmartinraw.com)

Elaine Ruth Millman (Co-Conspirator)

George Herbert Walker Bush (Co-Conspirator Ex CIA Director/Former US President)

(Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Neil Bush (Co-Conspirator Former Director Silverado Savings & Loan) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Jeb Bush (C0-Conspirator Governor Florida) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Carl Lindner (Co-Conspirator Bush Crime Family Money Launderer/Kingpin/Scamster "The Ohio Connection")

(Note: www.almartinraw.com)

(1 of 8)

Gale Norton (Co-Conspirator US Secretary Of Interior/ Former Attorney General Colorado) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Phillip D. Winn (Co Conspirator Convicted Hud Figure/Former Swiss Ambassador/Pres. Pardoner MDC Director) (Note: almartinraw.com)

Larry A. Mizel (Co Conspirator CEO MDC Holdings, Inc. Parent Co. of Silverado/Imperial Savings) (Note: wwwalmartinraw.com)

Norman Phillip Brownstein (Co-Conspirator Council to CIA Director George Bush Current Bush Crime Family Attorney, Former MDC Director)

(Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Oliver North (Co-Conspirator) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Hillary Clinton (Co-Conspirator CIA Counsel US Senator Ny.) (Note:www.almartinraw.com)

William Jefferson Clinton (Co-Conspirator CIA Agent/Former US President) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Charles Keating (Co-Conspirator CEO Lincoln Savings/CIA Operative) (Note: wwwalmartinraw.com)

Federico Pena (Co-Conspirator Former Mayor Denver, Co., Former Secretary Transportation/ Resigned Sec Energy while under indictment) (Note:www.almartinraw.com)

Wellington Webb (Co-Conspirator Mayor Denver, Colorado)

Meyer Blinder (Co- Conspirator CEO Blinder/Robinson/National Brokerage Group of Companies) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

Linda Thomas (Co-Conspirator Judge Dallas, TX.)

Zita L. Weinshenk (Co-Conspirator US Federal Judge Denver)

Edward Nottingham (Co-Conspirator US Federal Judge Denver)

Sherman Finsilver (Co-Conspirator Retired US Federal Judge Denver)

Henry Solano (Co-Conspirator Former US Attorney, Denver)

(2of 8)

Michael J. Norton (Co-Conspirator Former US Attorney, Denver)

Greg C. Graff (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Attorney, Denver)

Thomas O'Rourke (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Attorney, Denver)

F. Joseph Mackey (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Attorney, Denver)

Charles Szekely (Co-Conspirator Assistant US Public Defender, Denver)

Charles Sandage (Co-Conspirator)

Lee Redneick (Co-Conspirator Inspector General US Department of Justice Public Integrity Section Washington. DC.) (Note: www.almartinraw.com)

David Mann (Assistant Inspector General  US Department of Justice Washington DC.)

Robert Pence (Co-Conspirator Former FBI/sac Denver)

James M. Lyons (Co-Conspirator Director MDC)

Allan Karsh (Co-Conspirator Denver Kingpin Leonard Millman's Brother-in-law)

Ted L. Gunderson (Co-Conspirator Former FBI/sac LA, CA., Current Illegal CIA Operative/Missile exportation, Narcotics Importer/Scamster)

(Note: Newsmakingnews.com)

Thomas Gaule (Co-Conspirator Convicted Killer, Las Vegas NV. Mental Case/Sidekick-Co-Conspirator to CIA Ted Gunderson)

Anna May Newman (Co-Conspirator Former employee for CIA Agent Clint Murchison side-kick-to CIA Ted Gunderson)

Las Vegas Police Department

(Unnamed co-conspirators)

Las Vegas District Attorneys Office

(Unnamed co-conspirators)

Las Vegas FBI Office

(Unnamed co-conspirators)

(3 of 8)

Las Vegas US Attorneys Office

(Unnamed co-conspirators)

Nevada Attorney General's Office

(Unnamed co-conspirator)

Additional Yet Unnamed Defendants 1-1000 and Co-Conspirators

Defendants,

MOTION FOR HEARING TO PRESENT EVIDENCE

BEFORE THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GRAND JURY

     COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Stewart A. Webb, pro se, and moves the District Court to enter orders directing the Federal Grand Jurors to hear allegations and testimony of the Plaintiff and others, (in secret) concerning the above named and Yet unnamed Defendants and their participation in a Continuous Criminal Enterprises, Racketeering Influence Corruption Organization (RICO), Obstruction of Justice, (under color and cover of law) Narcotics trafficking into the United States of America, Racketeering and Conspiracy to defraud the People of the United States of America.

(The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals holds that a prosecutor may not prevent a citizen from presenting a complaint to the Grand Jury. "To fulfill its function of protecting individual citizens and providing them with a forum for bringing complaints within the criminal justice system, the Grand Jury must be open to the public for the independent presentation of evidence before it.  If the Grand Jury is available only to the prosecuting attorney and all complaints must pass through him, the Grand Jury can justifiably be described as a prosecutorial tool...We therefore hold that, by application to the Circuit Judge, whose duty it is to insure access to the Grand Jury, any person may to the Grand Jury to present a complaint to it."

Furthermore, the Court continues, a prosecutor may not render unsworn testimony in an attempt to dissuade the Grand Jury from hearing the Citizen's evidence.  Finally, a writ of prohibition will lie to prevent a prosecutor from attempting to discourage the Grand Jury from hearing the complaint.  (Miller v. Smith; W Va Sup Ct App, 12/18/81).

     If a U.S./District Attorney fails/refuses to sign and execute a valid Grand Jury Indictment, the Grand Jury can hold that U.S./District Attorney in Contempt and order the Sheriff or Marshals to arrest and hold him in jail until he either signs and executes the Indictment or else resigns his job as U.S./District Attorney (Public Servant).  This is the absolute power of the Grand Jury, and the Sheriff/Marshal, as executor of the Grand Jury's will.

(4 of 8)

NATURE OF CASE AND BACKGROUND FACT

     Plaintiff, along with others (numerous witnesses) unnamed at this time, have documentation and evidence from "first person" observation that will show above named Defendants and unnamed Defendants and others have engaged in Continuous Criminal activity for an unspecified period of time and have defrauded the united State of People and the Government of the united State and of several States by actions which are codified in the United States Code as criminal in nature and that have duly been passed by the Congress as Criminal Activity.

Plaintiff requests that a US Federal Citizens Grand Jury be convened at the earliest practical time so that this testimony and presentation of evidence may be offered.

     Plaintiff, having been related through marriage to Leonard Yale Millman and Elaine Ruth Millman, has observed specific criminal activity with respect to the business operations and affiliations of Leonard Yale Millman (an organized crime figure) and his direct and indirect participation with other Co-Conspirators and Co-Defendants named and unnamed in the captioned case and demands the opportunity to testify to a Federal Grand Jury relating to these Crimes.

     Plaintiff is well apprised of making false statements to a government agency under 18 USC 35, 1001, 2071 and others and demands to bring forth evidence under oath or affirmation as to the substance of these allegations.

    

Plaintiff wishes to notice the Court and that it would be a MISPRISION OF FELONY under 18 USC 4 to fail to disclose felonious acts that have been witnessed by or that have come to the attention of the Plaintiff. Plaintiff and others are also aware that Treason and Sedition against the United States of America and its People have been committed by the above named and unnamed defendants and Co-Conspirators.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

     Plaintiff wishes to bring forth evidence to the Federal Grand Jury concerning crimes, which have been committed against the United States of America and its People.  Plaintiff will show through evidence and testimony that various felonious acts including Perjury to arrest Plaintiff,

Theft through Government Contract Fraud, HUD Fraud, FDIC Fraud, Attempted Murder of Plaintiff, Attempted Murder of Plaintiffs Daughter, Murder, Intimidation, False Imprisonment to Silence A Federal Whistleblower/Informant, Perjury,

Malious Prosecution of Plaintiff, High Treason, Obstruction of Justice, Bribes paid to obstruct justice, Narcotics Trafficking, Money Laundering, Real Estate Loan Fraud, Securities Fraud, Oil and Gas Fraud, Savings and Loan Fraud,

(5 of 8)

Blackmail of US Congressman and Senators and other public officials, extortion,

Attempted murder, murder and the cover up there of, intimidation of witness, false arrests and imprisonment of plaintiff and witness, have been committed by Defendants, both named and unnamed

Under the Federal Criminal Statues embodied in Several Titles of United States Code Both Civil and Criminal as follows:

In Violations of the following named and unnamed Laws and US Codes:

Please Note: Venue Quo Warranto Government Official refuses to do their jobs.

I am note educated in law and am pro se litigant there are numerous other violations that can be presented upon testimony).

Numerous Violations of Due Process of Law.

Plaintiffs federal claim arises pursuant to the Federal Whistleblowers Act/Judicial act 31 USC 3729 through 3732.

And the following:

Quo Warranto (Public Servants refuse to do their job)

Money Laundering Control Act

Uniform Child Custody Jurisdictional Act

28 USC 1391

Bank Secrecy Act

Titles:18 USC 1503 Intimidate a Witness,

18 USC 1510 Obstructing a Criminal Investigation,

18 USC 1512 Tampering with a witness, Victim or Informant,

18 USC 1512 Engaging in Misleading Conduct

18 USC 1512 (a) (l) (c) Criminalizing the Act of Preventing Communications to Authorities when the Communications relate to the possible commission of Federal Offenses

18 USC 1513 Retaliation against a witness, victim or an informant

18 USC 4 Federal Reporting Crime Act (whoever having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the united States, conceals and does not, as soon as possible, make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the united States shall be fined not more than $500.00 or imprisoned not more than three years or both).

28 USC 1331 Violations of the Barkley Cole Indenture Act.

28 USC 1343

28 USC 1443

42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986, 1987 Civil Rights and Whistleblower case laws.

18 USC 1001 Perjury and false complaints

18 USC 371 Defraud the United States

18 USC 1002, 1003, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1010, 1011, 1012, 1016.

(6 of 8)

18 USC 1927 Through 18 USC 1967 (RICO) Racketeering, Influence, Corruption, Organization Act

18 USC 1960, 1901, 1905, 1911, 1952, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964 (RICO)

Civil RICO

Continuous Criminal Enterprise Act (CCE)

18 USC 241 Conspiracy

18 USC 242 Conspiracy

31 USC 3729 False Claims Act

22 USC 445 (Treason) Neutrality Act of 1939

22 USC 447 Neutrality Act of 1939

18 USC 1505

18 USC 1514

18 USC 1515

18 USC 1701

18 USC 1702

18 USC 1708

18 USC 1909

18 USC 2071

18 USC 35 Imparting or conveying false information.

18 USC 494, 513, 641, 648, 656, 657, 658, 664.

18 USC 921, 926, (a) 929, 969, 982.

18 USC 1163, 1344, 1345.

18 USC 2381 TREASON

18 USC 2382 Misprision of Treason

18 USC 2383 Rebellion or Insurrection

18 USC 2384 Seditious Conspiracy

18 USC 3130----3730 Money Laundering

18 USC 1968 Civil Investigative Demand

18 USC 2521

18 USC 1621, 1622, 1623.

18 USC 1113

18 USC 875 (c) Death threats against Plaintiff beginning in 1984. And others.

18 USC 1117 Conspiracy to Murder Plaintiff.

18 USC 1952 (a), 1952 (b), (4) (3)  (6)

18 USC 2251, 2252, 2253, 2254.

18 USC 3109

18 USC 2421, 2422, 2423.

18 USC 3057, 3059, 3060, 3071, 3076, 3077.

18 USC 1503

28 USC 1331, 1332,

28 USC 1391

(7 of 8)

18 USC 1983----1985

18 USC 2381, 2382, 2383, 2384.

Therefore, premises considered, this action is properly grounded in both jurisdiction and venue under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (F.R.Cr.P.)

WHEREFORE, premises considered and good cause having been shown that these allegations are in the public's interest, Plaintiff moves the Court to grant the convening of a Grand Jury at a specified time and place as the Court deemed proper so that Plaintiff and others may bring forth evidence to demonstrate that violations of the Laws of the united States of America have been violated and that Defendants are currently

Engaged in an Ongoing Continuous Enterprise and the Plaintiff and others lives are in danger of this filing.

Respectfully submitted,

Stewart A. Webb

September 18, 2001

Obama Orders U.S. Lockdown

Obama Orders U.S. Lockdown

TOM HENEGHAN EXPLOSIVE INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS

ALL Patriot Americans MUST know, with sources inside American/European intelligence agencies and INTERPOL reporting what is really going on behind the scenes of the corporate-controlled, fascist, extortion-friendly propaganda U.S. media's massive deceptionshttp://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/
https://twitter.com/Tom_Heneghan

Sunday   February 2, 2014

Obama Orders U.S. Lockdown

by Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert

Obama and Holder and the Nazi Paperclip NSA
source  source

UNITED States of America  -  It can now be reported that U.S. President Barack Obama has signed an Executive Order (E.O. 103301) giving U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder emergency control over the NSA (National Security Agency).

What this means is that the U.S. Department of Justice now has total surveillance ability over all U.S. citizens phone calls and emails as well as all communications on U.S. military bases domestic and on foreign soil.

DOJ/NSA will also continue to monitor all financial transactions by U.S. citizens and worldwide banks.

Item:  At this hour President Obama and U.S. Attorney General Holder know the credit card numbers of every U.S. citizen.

This declaration of 'Martial Law' by the Obama Administration is a precursor to a impending financial emergency (which will lead to a massive crooked bank "bail- in" on all U.S. savings deposits and checking accounts) and an attempt by Obama and Holder to preempt the activities a U.S. Military Grand Jury operating in Charlotte, North Carolina that has already indicted Attorney General Holder on charges of obstruction of justice and treason regarding Holder withholding key evidence linking Saudi intelligence to the 9/11 FALSE FLAG aka neo-Nazi George W. BushFRAUD's Reichstag Fire attack on the United States.

Holder is also currently covering up massive electronic trading fraud involving Bank of America and STOLEN U.S. Treasury funds.

P.S.  At this hour, JPMorgan Chase, its affiliate Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Union Bank of Switzerland are hopelessly cross-collateralized to each other involving $65.4 BILLION of worthless derivatives aka I.O.U.s between the aforementioned banks.

Note:  The $65.4 BILLION of reported derivatives does not include the TRILLIONS of dollars of unreported derivatives parked at various zombie banks in the Canary Islands with a direct link to former Republican Presidential year 2012 nominee Mitt Romney and the Mormon Church.

Item:  Romney's major financial supporters include the Mormon Church and JPMorgan Chase.
    
P.P.S.  We can also divulge that the aforementioned banks have been tied to more financial corruption involving now disgraced former Bitcoin Chairman Charlie Sherm involving a worldwide FOREX currency money laundry and the funding of alleged Al Qaeda terrorists with a direct link to Citibank and the Saudi Royal Family.

Definition:  Al Qaeda, a U.S. funded CIA data base.

P.P.P.S.  We can also reveal that the government of the Russian Federation has hired Israeli security firms that utilize a software called "Nice" to provide security at the forthcoming Sochi Olympics in Russia.

image credit Reuters  sourcesource
source

These are the same Israeli security firms that have a link to the noted security firm, The Chertoff Group, that provided security during the Boston Marathon terrorist FALSE FLAG and were also present on the ground in the state of New Jersey just outside New York City and were also present as security officials at the Boston Logon Airport the day of the 9/11 BLACK OP; also present at the 7/7 London bombings.

9/11 Co-conspirator
Dual U.S.-Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff
source

Reference:  The Washington-based Chertoff Group is administered by its President, dual U.S./Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, who was the former DHS Secretary under year 2000 illegal occupant George W. BushFRAUD and was also former U.S. Attorney for the state of New Jersey and Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice's Criminal Division on 9/11, arranged with the BushFRAUD Administration for the immediate release of 9/11-linked Israeli suspects, the noted "Dancing Israeli", who were arrested by the New Jersey State Police with Arab head dress and costumes in the back of their van.

source

Chertoff and the BushFRAUD Administration prevented the FBI from even interviewing these 9/11 suspects.

Chertoff was co-author of the UN-Constitutional Patriot Act aka an exact replica of Adolf Hitler's post Reichstag Fire Enabling Act.

And now it gets worse!

Replacing Chertoff as New Jersey U.S. Attorney from the years 2002 to 2008 was none other than current Republican Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie.

Christie continued to cover up major evidence involving the 9/11 Dancing Israelis and their ties to 9/11.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie
source

At this hour we can divulge that the Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie has received immunity from the U.S. Military Grand Jury operating in Charlotte, North Carolina in regards to evidence Christie has in his possession tying both Israeli and Saudi intelligence to the 9/11 BLACK OP attack on the United States.

Clearly, the U.S. NSA controlled media psyop versus Christie known as "Bridgegate" is an attempt to blackmail and forestall Christie from moving forward with the U.S. Military Grand Jury in bringing justice for the perpetrators of 9/11 HIGH TREASON-GATE.

In closing, at this hour at least 29 tons of Fukushima radioactive waste continues to be present 150 miles from Tokyo, Japan.  The worldwide radiation threat continues to escalate with the U.S. government failing to properly protect the American People from this grave threat.

Finally, eyes over Thailand, eyes over Singapore, eyes over China soon their ATM machines will only involve counterfeit Iraqi dinar and counterfeit Thai Baht currency.

China is broke!
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->

http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/Obama-Orders-US-Lockdown__02-02-2014.html

LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

When will all involved, including Obama the CEO of the Corporation; be arrested, charged with High Treason, murder, theft of the peoples money all over the world, etc..and be out of the peoples lives forever ???? Obama has done and continues to do espionage, why is he still there ????

LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

By James A. Lyons

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Reports released recently by both the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee and the House Armed Services Committee have mostly discredited the Dec. 28 article on Benghazi by David Kirkpatrick in The New York Times. Both reports and the newspaper article have served the purpose of refocusing America’s attention on this tragedy.
When combined with the Jan. 6 letter to House Speaker John A. Boehner signed by more than 70 people, including relatives of those killed, urging him to form a select committee to investigate the Benghazi tragedy, it should send the signal that this issue is not going away — no matter how many “Bridgegates.”
The speaker’s contention that having five separate standing committees investigating Benghazi should be more than sufficient does not pass the smell test. This has been a disjointed effort that has yielded few results. Mr. Boehner further claims that with the tight budget situation we are facing, it takes a lot of money to staff a full “Watergate-type” select committee.
However, the funding issue hasn’t deterred President Obama from approving the transfer of $1 billion to the Palestinian Authority to keep the organization at the negotiating table. This is in addition to the $500 million that Secretary of State John F. Kerry has already turned over.Since there apparently is no shortage of slush funds for the Palestinian Authority, Mr. Boehner certainly should be able to find funds for a select committee with full subpoena power to investigate the deaths of four Americans, including a U.S. ambassador.
Polls by both Democratic pollster Pat Caddell and Republican pollster John McLaughlin released in October 2013 showed that 62 percent of Americans want a select committee to be appointed. Therefore, it can’t be for political reasons that Mr. Boehner opposes the select committee proposed by Republican Rep. Frank R. Wolf of Virginia in House Resolution 36, which has 178 co-sponsors. There have been reports that Mr. Boehner, as a member of the “Super 8” intelligence group, may have been briefed on special activities in Libya, including the transfer of arms to al Qaeda-affiliated militias authorized by the Obama administration. While this could be more than embarrassing, it’s a separate concern from the “dereliction of duty” issue, which involves security failures at the Benghazi Special Mission Compound prior to and during the attack, and the absence of a military response.
For the record, two months after the compound was opened, an internal State Department assessment was made on the adequacy of its security. The assessment essentially stated that unless the security is significantly increased, the compound should be closed. This assessment is buried in the Accountability Review Board report. With this assessment, how could the State Department continue to not only deny requests for increased security, but actually draw down security assets in the country? For example, on June 7, 2012, Ambassador J. Christopher Steven’s request for two mobile security detachment teams was denied by the State Department.
On Aug. 2, 2012, Stevens’ request for 11 additional personal bodyguards was also denied by State, even though he called the situation unpredictable and violent. Compounding the situation, the three quick-reaction units under the command of Col. Andrew Wood, deployed in Tripoli, were withdrawn in August over the objections of both the embassy and Col. Wood. On Aug. 16, Stevens sent a cable to Washington warning that the Benghazi mission could not withstand a coordinated attack.
With an out-of-control security situation throughout Libya, particularly in Benghazi, the question has to be asked, why were there no contingency plans or forces pre-positioned, ready to respond to potential attacks on our facilities on the 11th anniversary of Sept. 11? According to a report in The Guardian, the readiness of the ambassador’s five-member security detail raises questions. Four of the agents were with Stevens when the attack occurred, while the fifth was in the Tactical Operations Center. Three of the four with Stevens, according to the report, left their rifles, helmets and body armor in another area under orders by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, which was confirmed by the Accountability Review Board report. This makes no sense, given that standard operating procedures in a hostile environment require that weapons be kept at the ready all times.
During a TV interview in October 2012, Lou Dobbs asked me what I thought happened. I stated that I think this was an operation that went terribly wrong. It was my view that the ambassador was to be captured and held hostage in exchange for the release of the so-called “Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman. With the deliberate drawdown of security assets in country and no military response, even though the United States had assets in theater, nothing else made sense to me.
Now we understand from Mr. Kirkpatrick’s New York Times article that the newspaper had a reporter on-scene in the compound during the attack. Why was he pre-positioned there? Has he ever been called to testify before any committee? Are we to believe The New York Times simply sat on this story for 15 months?
There are many unanswered questions, even with the recent congressional committee reports that can only be obtained by the formation of a select committee with full subpoena power. Mr. Boehner must support Mr. Wolf’s Resolution 36 and restore integrity to the office of the speaker. The four dead Americans deserve nothing less.
James A. Lyons, U.S. Navy retired admiral, was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/16/lyons-benghazi-demands-a-select-committee-in-congr/#ixzz2sIjtoThL

Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 | Posted by Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall

Blanket Immunity For American Taxpayers… A Plan to Dismantle Debt Lawfully

By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall

In the United States House of Representatives, the “Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending” (otherwise known as H.R. 2634) was passed on April 24, 2008. The heading of that Act explains the concept behind what it covers:
“H. R. 2634
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 24, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
AN ACT
To provide for greater responsibility in lending and expanded cancellation of debts owed to the United States and the international financial institutions by low-income countries, and for other purposes.
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Jubilee Act for Responsible Lending and Expanded Debt Cancellation of 2008′.”
In other words, the United States wants to cancel the debts owed to it by international financial institutions in low-income countries.This is a little like a man who stands on the street starving while offering to buy the rest of the world dinner – using a credit card, of course.

You can read the rest of the Jubilee Act H.R. 2634 HERE.

It doesn’t take a lot of mathematical skill to figure this out.The dollar, or more accurately stated the Federal Reserve Note, has depreciated to the point where its value (being generous) is about 6 or 7 cents when compared to the 100 cents it was worth when the Federal Reserve Act was passed on December 23, 1913 and the unlawfully established Federal Reserve System took over the reins of America’s monetary management.
The 100-year contract established with this privately-owned corporation known as “The Federal Reserve” will come to an end on December 23, 2013.On its 100^th anniversary, the Federal Reserve System leaves the American people about 17 trillion dollars in debt – times five in long-term debt.As of 2012, the Gross Domestic Product of the United States was close to $16.5 trillion.Comparatively, Spain’s Gross Domestic Product for 2012 was about $1.3 trillion.Spain’s debt was $2.3 trillion.Spain has a 167 debt-to-GDP ratio.The United States has a 106 percent debt-to-GDP; Italy’s debt at $2.5 trillion is 108 percent debt-to-GDP.The European Union was at 85 percent at year-end 2012.
When you take all of the above and input it into my brain, it comes out this way:For every dollar we print to repay our debt, we go 46 cents more in debt than we were before we printed the currency (or sold the bond or keyed a number into a computer) to reduce our debt.In other words, as things stand at this moment in time it is impossible for America to repay her debt.You can find the statistical data for debt-to-GDP HERE.And this is just the tip of the iceberg as it relates to actual US debt.Or, look at it this way.One trillion seconds is almost 32,000 years. So to pay off the debt, if Congress put a hundred dollar bill per second into an account to pay the debt, it would take well over 4,000 years to get the job done.
There is much history regarding the concept of what is called odious debt.Americans need to pay attention to what it is and learn to use the concept to tell the US Treasury and Federal Reserve System where to go look for the trillions of dollars they say the American people owe in government debt.According to the Doctrine of Odious Debt, we the people owe about 25 percent of what the Federal Government and the Federal Reserve System tell us we owe.
The concept of odious – or immoral – debt is not a bee I got in my bonnet one day and decided to dream a little dream of reduced debt, fewer taxes, more jobs, and a return to the Rule of Law.This is a serious matter and is one with which the nations of France, Russia, Germany and the United States are very familiar because it has been used by those nations and others.
After the Civil War, it was found that the Confederate States incurred great debt in its attempt to secede from the Union.The North won that war.It would have been immoral for the taxpayers of the United States (North and South) to be forced to pay the debts of the Confederacy which had seceded from the Union during the time the debt was incurred.The 14^th Amendment of the United States Constitution repudiated those debts.

Section 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 4 of Amendment 14 raises some very interesting questions regarding “insurrection” or “rebellion” as, it can be argued, Citizens of this nation had an economic war declared against them by too big to jail banksters when the protections of the Glass Steagall Act and the McFadden Act were, with careless disregard for the outcome, over-ridden.For close to ten years, Washington’s political machine has used debt to enslave the American populace… what else can you call debt that is so huge it is not repayable?The only thing that stands behind the value of the US Federal Reserve Note – American currency, regardless of what you call it – is the blood, sweat and tears of the American people.If you don’t pay your taxes, you go to jail.According to the 14^th Amendment, public debt must be authorized by law.From where does our Rule of Law in America flow?The Constitution!
We do not honor debts resulting from dishonorable purposes.We did not honor the debts of the Confederacy.After the Spanish-American War ended in 1898, the US turned to the Doctrine of Odious Debt when it rejected Cuba’s debts to Spain.We said the debts “…were imposed upon the people of Cuba without their consent and by force of arms.”
The peace negotiators argued that much of the debt was used to crush the efforts of the Cuban people to revolt against the domination of the Spanish.The money was spent in a way that was contrary to the interests of the Cuban people.To ask them to pay for debts incurred to help continue keeping them in a perpetual state of slavery would be immoral… it was odious debt – or, unlawful debt.To command the people of any nation to keep their shoulders to the rock of debt and keep pushing it uphill under threat of imprisonment if they do not is… slavery.Does that mean that any funds spent by the NSA for PRISM to spy on the American people are odious – immoral?How about the funds spent by the IRS in an effort to crush the efforts of some of the American people from revolting against unconstitutional domination?
According to an excellent research article written by Patricia Adams, executive director of Probe International and author of “Odious Debts:Loose Lending, Corruption, and the Third World’s Environmental Legacy” (London:Earthscan, 1991), the legal Doctrine of Odious Debts was shaped and hones by Alexander Nahum Sack about 25 years after the settlement of the Spanish-American War.If you are interested in a more in-depth overview, you can find Ms. Adams’ article reprinted at the LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE SITE.She said:
“After the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks repudiated Russia’s debts indiscriminately. Sack, a professor of law in Paris and former minister in the Tsarist government, authored two major works on the obligations of successor systems and defined in law which debts are legitimate and which illegitimate. With colonial territories becoming independent nation states and colonies changing hands, with monarchies being replaced by republics and military rule by civilians, with constantly changing borders throughout Europe, and with the ascendant new ideologies of socialism, communism, and fascism overthrowing old orders, Sack’s debt theories dealt with the practical problems created by such transformations of state. Like many others, Sack believed that liability for public debts should remain intact, for these debts represent obligations of the state–the state being the territory, rather than a specific governmental structure. This he based not on some strict
dictate of natural justice but on the exigencies of international commerce. Without strong rules, he believed, chaos would reign in relations between nations and international trade and finance would break down. But Sack believed that debts not created in the interests of “the state” should not be bound to this general rule. Some debts, he said, were “dettes odieuses.” If a despotic power incurs a debt not for the needs or in the interest of the State, but to strengthen its despotic regime, to repress the population that fights against it, etc., this debt is Odious for the population of all the State,”
As I understand what is said in this well researched article, “…if a government becomes despotic and incurs debt not for the needs or in the interest of the State but to strengthen its despotic regime, to repress the population that fights against it,”it sounds to me like all of the quantitative easing from TARP to TALF to the multi-trillion dollar loans made by the Federal Reserve System to Wall Street investment banks and international banks (as well as corporations — $16 trillion alone in 2011), can be considered “odious debt” and stricken from the books – and the backs – of the American (and French, and German, and British, and Greek, and Italian, and Spanish) people.
Since 2002, Argentina has fought the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF’s) attempts to impose restrictive measures of economic austerity on the country. The IMF wanted to do what the IMF is known worldwide for doing:It wanted to finance infrastructure, pay for research… you know the routine:Make a country borrow and spend money building roads and airports and bridges and other “shovel ready projects.” Such strategies force any nation deeper and deeper and deeper in debt until it is in economic ruin.Sound familiar?
On the other hand, it is equally true that Argentina seems to lack character as a state when it comes to repaying its loans.They seem to believe that banks in other nations should lend them money but they can choose not to repay – and other nations and banks should keep lending them money.They have not yet figured out that the credit process is a two-way street:“I lend you money; you repay the money.”
Aside from nations that view the Doctrine of Odious Debt as a means to get out of debt every ten years, this concept may lend itself to an exit strategy for sovereign nations of the world to escape the crushing debt being heaped on the heads of people worldwide.The idea does hold some thoughtful possibilities. Iceland thought so – and its crooked bankers and its crooked politicians sit in Icelandic prisons rather than getting multi-million dollar bonuses annually… and Iceland thrives.Too bad the Greeks and Spanish haven’t followed in their footsteps.
What the Doctrine of Odious Debt makes quite clear is that a lie has been forced upon the majority of the world’s population by oligarchic elites.They like the concept of a two-class system with them as the elitists, running things, while the rest of us who used to be middle class are shoved into the labor class forced into careers they, not we, decide are best for us.
Undoubtedly, one reason Julian Assange sits in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London is because he gave copies of documented conversations between elitist bankers and others about how to cripple the economies of South America.The conversations Assange theoretically gave the South American governments focused on how to take South America’s energy resources, prevent economic recovery, and force the governments of the continent to pursue a neo-colonialist policy “so Spain, Italy and Germany can, with British capital, benefit from the difficulties sure to follow when the recommended policies are followed.”Anyone who has read Confessions of an Economic Hit Man will recognize the parallels.
And, without intending to, Ecuador has exposed a great weakness in the world financial systems.
On December 16, 2008, Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa didn’t make a scheduled interest payment on private bonds.Ecuador had defaulted in 1998 when going through a financial crisis.This time, however, was different.Correa told the world that his small nation was not going to pay “obviously immoral and illegitimate debts.”
Ecuador’s gross domestic product (GDP) is close to 50 billion euros and its “immoral debt” is about 11 billion euros.It’s a small country.But that isn’t the point.The “immoral debt” point made by Rafael Correa, was announced on television on December 12, 2008.He said immoral and illegitimate debts were those debts that violated the Ecuadorian Constitution and oppressed his people.
The question, then, becomes:What debts are “odious” or “immoral,” and which are not?What is an illegitimate debt?President Correa related the Ecuadorian “immoral debt” to violations of that nation’s Constitution.If the Tea Party and Liberty Action Groups have any understanding of the significance of what is being said here, they will find access to constitutional legal and accounting expertise that can answer the question:What debts are odious or immoral?Which debts are not?
In America, we can look at mortgage-backed derivatives and millions of unlawful foreclosures and costing the people trillions of dollars to immediately identify trillions of dollars of property value and profits by banks that can be defined no way other than immoral.Well, perhaps unlawful, too.These debts and the government funds loaned to the banksters that created them and who got bailed out by additional funds from taxes on American citizens can probably make the best claim of “immoral” or “odious” debt of any citizens in the world.
What else might represent “immoral debt?”
If, as Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa says, “illegitimate debts violate the Ecuadorian Constitution and oppressed his people,” every other country that is drowning in immoral debt can make the same logical and lawful claim.If debt is defined as anything unconstitutional, a claim can be made that the entire Federal Reserve System is “unconstitutional.”
Article One, Section 8 of the United States Constitution says “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United State;” Section 8 also says Congress has the responsibility “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;”.
There is a lawful way to change the Constitution of the United States.It involves both the House of Representatives and the Senate.Each must approve by a two-thirds supermajority vote a joint resolution amending the Constitution.The joint resolution does not require the signature of the President but is sent directly to the states for ratification.Once ratified via a vote by the People, the Constitution is lawfully amended.That is the process put in place by our Founding Fathers.
As anyone who is familiar with the history of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 knows, this procedure was not followed.Instead, politicians who supported the concept of a central bank (which America had only briefly on two occasions until 1913) let their opponents go home for Christmas on December 23rd and proceeded to pass this Act unconstitutionally.The Congress cannot, under its own limited power, change the Constitution of the United States.The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the banking system that evolved from it have never been constitutional.
Foreign nations should be aware:You may be doing business with an unlawful Corporation if you’re doing business within the Federal Reserve System.The Federal Reserve System continues to be in violation of the US Constitution and not qualified to create debt in the name of the people of the United States of America… the debt of the Fed being thus “immoral” or “odious.”That means it may be debt we, the citizens of this Great Nation, can write off.
Even by-passing the unlawful – which means “odious” and/or “immoral” – debt created by the Federal Reserve System, there is much debt from equally unconstitutional sources.For example, only the Congress has the constitutional (moral) authority to declare war.Could that mean that any debt from non-declared wars represents “immoral debt?”It’s certainly a good argument!
Eduador’s President Rafael Correa says immoral and illegitimate debts violated the Constitution of his country and oppressed his people.He refused to pay them.If that is the standard by which we define “immoral debt,” it is of critical importance.It presents to the American people – to the people of the world – a strategy for getting rid of a lot of debt… immoral debt.“Oh, Immoral Debt, How do I define thee?Let me count the ways…”
It sounds like what we Americans needs is a good, old fashioned South American style refusal to repay “immoral debt.”If you really look closely at the debt incurred since 1988, a vast majority of it could easily be defined as unconstitutional and, thus, immoral – or, if you prefer, “odious.”
I love irony… especially when it bites someone in the butt who really deserves it.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/08/27/blanket-immunity-for-american-taxpayers-a-plan-to-dismantle-debt-lawfully/