Saturday, February 8, 2014

Dutch Bankers Swear to God as Trust in Lenders Slumps

Dutch Bankers Swear to God as Trust in Lenders Slumps

BY  /  FRIDAY, 07 FEBRUARY 2014 /  PUBLISHED IN ABSOLUTE DATA
irN2_jHQ5ieU.jpg



Dutch Bankers Swear to God as Trust in Lenders Slumps
By By Maud van Gaal, published February 6, 2014


“I swear that I will do my utmost to preserve and

enhance confidence in the financial-services industry. So help me God.”



The oath, the first of its kind in Europe, became binding on board members of Dutch banks last month as the government sought to rein in an industry with assets more than four times the size of the country’s economy. All 90,000 Dutch bank employees must take the pledge, or a non-religious affirmation, starting the second half of this year. They’ll be punished should they break new ethical rules, Banking Association Chairman Chris Buijink said in an interview in Amsterdam.
Dutch bankers who fail to abide by the new rules may be blacklisted, face fines or suspensions, Buijink, 59, said. The revised code will be completed within months and disciplinary sanctions will be applied at the start of next year, he said.
Bankers across the globe are struggling to convince the public that they are stamping out unethical behavior that contributed to a 2008 financial crisis, costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars in bailouts. The Netherlands is demanding bankers enforce stricter codes of conduct after spending more than 95 billion euros ($128 billion) in capital and guarantees over the past six years to bail banks out.

Rate-Rigging

Bert Bruggink, chief financial officer at Rabobank Groep, the Dutch bank fined 774 million euros in October for its part in a global interest rate-rigging scandal, took the oath last year in a ceremony with Lense Koopmans, the supervisory board chairman who has since left the company. He said the words were a confirmation of the ethics he already sticks to.
“It’s a good signal to your employees and brings back awareness of the importance of these values,” said Bruggink, 50, who’s been CFO of the biggest Dutch mortgage lender since 2004. “It fits in with these times, where banks have to work hard to restore trust.”
Many aspects of the new disciplinary system remain unclear. Dutch banks have almost a year to set it up. There would be a disciplinary commission or tribunal similar to those policing the country’s brokers, investment advisers and medical profession. The system would apply to all bank employees taking the oath.

Trust Low

Public confidence in banks slumped globally as taxpayer money was used to rescue them and fines were levied for alleged wrongdoing such as manipulating interest rates and misselling financial products. U.S. and European lenders have incurred more than $200 billion in legal and liability expenses, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The Netherlands nationalized Fortis in 2008 and SNS Reaal NV, the nation’s fourth-biggest bank, last year. It also injected capital into ING Groep NV (INGA), the biggest financial-services company, and insurer Aegon NV. (AGN)
ING supports the Dutch Banking Association’s plan to extend the oath and is considering how to implement this meaningfully for about 17,000 people it employs in the Netherlands, Carolien van der Giessen, a spokeswoman based in Amsterdam, said in an e-mailed response to questions.

‘The Banker’

While Dutch bankers need to take the new ethical rules seriously, implementation may present challenges, Jonathan Soeharno, a lawyer at De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek in Amsterdam, said by telephone.
“Other professions, such as lawyers and doctors, have a long-standing tradition of ethics,” he said. “With bankers, however, we don’t really know what the professional standards entail. More so, we don’t really know what ‘‘the banker” is. There is a large variation of roles within the industry.’’
The cost of bank rescues in the Netherlands contributed to an increase in national debt to an estimated 75 percent of gross domestic product in 2013 from 46 percent in 2007. The budget deficit grew to as much as 5.6 percent of GDP since the crisis, the widest since 1995.
The Netherlands has reduced national debt by 1.1 percentage points of GDP by selling $11.5 billion of ING’s U.S. mortgage-backed securities for $8.9 billion, Finance Minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem said today.

Least Trusted

The financial services industry is the least trusted of all industries globally, according to a survey of 31,000 people in 26 countries published by public-relations firm Edelman two weeks ago. Thirteen percent of Dutch citizens see banks’ performance as good or excellent compared with an average of 33 percent globally, the survey showed.
Thirty-four percent of Dutch citizens expressed trust in the finance industry last year compared with 90 percent in 2008, according to research published in December byRonald Pont and Rene Tissen. Pont, a consultant, and Tissen, a professor at Nyenrode Business University in Breukelen, the Netherlands, have studied data and reports from companies, regulators and consultants annually since 2008.
The U.K.’s biggest banks, including Barclays Plc (BARC)HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA) and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc named Richard Lambert to run a group to oversee industry standards of competence and behavior last year. Lambert, former head of the Confederation of British Industry, will publish recommendations by the end of March. In Australia, bankers developed an oath that individuals can adopt voluntarily as a personal commitment.

Stringent Regulation

Deutsche Bank AG, Europe’s biggest investment bank by revenue, published a set of values for employees on its website in July, after saying it was introducing measures to enforce cultural change in 2012. In December, the company was among six banks fined a total of 1.7 billion euros by the European Union for rigging interest rateslinked to Libor. It has spent 5.3 billion euros on regulatory fines and legal settlements since 2008.
“An oath can be effective only if it is part of a broad reform program,” John Boatright, a professor of business ethics at Loyola University Chicago, said in an e-mailed response to questions. “It could be highly effective when combined with more stringent regulation and a more detailed code of conduct.”
Dijsselbloem, who also leads the euro area’s group of finance ministers, has said he may step in and enforce disciplinary sanctions should the industry fail to do so. For now, Dijsselbloem will amend existing legislation on supervision to ensure disciplinary rules developed by the banks become binding on all employees.
The Netherlands also plans to limit bankers’ bonuses to 20 percent of pay, a level that goes beyond European Union plans of one times salary, Dijsselbloem said in November. Rabobank and ING have expressed concern, saying it will be more difficult to attract and retain staff.
To contact the reporter on this story: Maud van Gaal in Amsterdam at mvangaal@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Frank Connelly at fconnelly@bloomberg.net

AD TAKEN FROM CRAIG'S LIST. FIFTY YEAR OLD MANURE SPREADER - $1 (WASHINGTON, DC )

This is really funny! Kudos to the person who put the ad on Craig's List!



YOU'RE PROBABLY NOT INTERESTED IN USED FARM EQUIPMENT, 
BUT YOU
 MIGHT ENJOY THIS AD TAKEN FROM CRAIG'S LIST.
FIFTY YEAR OLD MANURE SPREADER - $1
 (WASHINGTON, DC )
Fifty-year old manure spreader. Not sure of brand. Said to have been produced in Kenya. 
Used for a few years in Indonesia before being smuggled into the US via Hawaii. 
Of questionable pedigree. Does not appear to have ever been worked hard. Apparently, 
it was pampered by various owners over the years. It doesn't work very often, but when it does 
it can sling manure for amazing distances. I am hoping to retire the manure spreader in 2016. 
I really don't want it hanging around getting in the way. I would prefer a foreign buyer to relocate
the manure spreader out of the country. I would be willing to trade it for a nicely framed copy 
of the United States Constitution. 
Location: Currently being stored in a big white house in Washington, D.C. 

Craig's List Ad - too good to not forward
 

The Truth About The 2 Governments 2 Flags 2 Jurisdictions

The Truth About The 2 Governments 2 Flags 2 Jurisdictions


Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute; [Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed 57; Dall. 54), defines governments succinctly]: 
 
"governments are corporations." Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary-having neither actuality nor substance - is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. therefore, can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and contracts between them." 
 
From a layperson's or intuitive perspective, it must seem improbable that corporations can speak, assert privacy rights, or invoke the double jeopardy clause. Even in a legal world filled with fictions, the corporate claim to personal Bill of Rights guarantees must appear fantastic to the non-lawyer. 41 Hastings Law Journal (March, 1990) 577, 655, "Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights" (Carl J. Mayer).

 
When a Citizen challenges the acts of a federal or state official as being illegal, that official cannot just simply avoid liability based upon the fact that he is a public official. In United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220, 221, 1 S.Ct. 240, 261, the United States claimed title to Arlington, Lee's estate, via a tax sale some years earlier, held to be void by the Court. In so voiding the title of the United States, the Court declared:

"No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it. It is the only supreme power in our system of government, and every man who by accepting office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives.

"Shall it be said... that the courts cannot give remedy when the citizen has been deprived of his property by force, his estate seized and converted to the use of the government without any lawful authority, without any process of law, and without any compensation, because the president has ordered it and his officers are in possession? If such be the law of this country, it sanctions a tyranny which has no existence in the monarchies of Europe, nor in any other government which has a just claim to well-regulated liberty and the protection of personal rights."

FIFTH AMENDMENT defined: Amendment to U.S. Constitution providing that no person shall be required to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous offense unless on indictment or presentment of a grand jury except in military cases; that no person will suffer double jeopardy; that no person will be compelled to be a witness against himself; that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law and that private property will not be taken for public use without just compensation. Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 627)

UK MP: Queen may derail March 2014 Brussels trial with Pope by arresting Kevin Annett for sedition

UK MP: Queen may derail March 2014 Brussels trial with Pope by arresting Kevin Annett for sedition

WATCH ON YOU TUBE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-G8PbuvVaY&feature=youtu.be
VANCOUVER, BC – Kevin Annett, field secretary of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS.ORG) declared today that he was informed by a British Member of Parliament that the Crown of England’s Privy Council in London is considering issuing an order to the Canadian Governor General and Prime Minister’s office to have him arrested and prosecuted for sedition. Kevin Annett’s lawyers have prepared an application for political asylum in the United States in the event that Mr. Annett should be arrested on orders of the Queen. Kevin Annett’s declarations came in an ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre.
Kevin Annett announced the commencement of a trial at the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels on March 31, 2014 against Queen Elizabeth, Pope Francis I, and the Jesuit Order and others for continuing child genocide and child trafficking.
Secret Holyrood Agreement to merge Catholic and Anglican Churches
Mr. Annett stated, “Last Monday, our organization revealed that on September 16, 2010, the Vatican and the Crown of England, through their chief officers, entered into a formal criminal conspiracy to traffick children and aid and abet child rapists throughout the world.
“That conspiracy occurred between Queen Elizabeth Windsor and former Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger, at Holyrood Castle in Edinburgh, where as a condition of the merger of the Church of England and the Church of Rome, the Queen agreed to place all Anglicans under the notorious catholic law known as Crimen Sollicitationas. This law requires that all child rape be covered up within the church, thereby obstructing justice and the sovereign laws of every country in the world in which catholicism or anglicanism operates, including the United States and Canada.
“The present Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, has not only concealed this conspiracy but has recently been accused by a key eyewitness of organizing the trafficking of children of political prisoners in Argentina under the military dictatorship there.”
References:
International Common Law Courts of Justice
http://iclcj.com/
ITCCS.ORG
http://itccs.org/
“Toothless” United Nations’ statement on catholic child rape condemned by ITCCS at New York rally – Pope Francis, the Jesuits and others to face prosecution by international court commencing March 31 – “Holyrood Agreement” between Queen Elizabeth and former Pope Benedict cited as proof of criminal conspiracy – Possible arrest order issued against Kevin Annett by the British Crown

http://itccs.org/2014/02/08/toothless-united-nations-statement-on-catholic-child-rape-condemned-by-itccs-at-new-york-rally-pope-francis-the-jesuits-and-others-to-face-prosecution-by-international-court-com/

Contact:
Email: Hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com
Facebook: ITCCS.ORG & Kevin Annett
https://www.facebook.com/groups/550797205008325/
Tel (USA): 1-386-323-5774

 UK MP: Queen may derail March 2014 Brussels trial with Pope by arresting Kevin Annett for sedition
 http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2014/02/uk-mp-queen-may-derail-march-2014-brussels-trial-with-pope-by-arresting-kevin-annett-for-sedition.html

Obama - Who knew back then?

Who knew back then?
You’ve probably never heard of this president’s beliefs in the teachings of Saul Alinsky.  In case you haven’t read his books, this will give you a glimpse of what he believes in.
 
Who was Saul Alinsky?
 
Saul David Alinsky, a writer, was an American community organizer
and writer.  He is generally considered to be the founder of the modern community organizing movement.
 
Born:   January 30, 1909, Chicago, IL
Died:  June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA
Education: 
 University of Chicago
Books: 
 Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals
 
 
He taught that there are eight levels of control that must be obtained
before you can create a social state:
 
1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
 
2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible.  Poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
 
 
3) Debt – Increase debt to an unsustainable level.  That way you will be able to increase taxes – and this will produce more poverty.
 
 
4) Gun Control – Remove the ability for citizens to defend themselves from the government.  That way you will be able to create a police state.
 
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (food, housing, and income).
 
6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.
 
7) Religion – Remove belief in the God from the government and schools.
 
8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor.  This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
 
 
Does any of this sound like what is happening in the U.S.?

McDonald's Worker Arrested After Telling Company President She Can't Afford Shoes For Her Children

McDonald's Worker Arrested After Telling Company President She Can't Afford Shoes For Her Children

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2479930/pg1

‘Doc shock’ spreads, as ObamaCare commissars try to legislate it away

THE REALITY OF THE UNAFFORDABLE CARE ACT HITS HOME



Coming to an employee provided healthcare near you soon.  All part of the plan folks… Dissatisfaction, civil demonstration, economy collapse, riots, violence, marshal law, dictatorship…

 

‘Doc shock’ spreads, as ObamaCare commissars try to legislate it away



By: John Hayward
2/6/2014 09:39 AM

The L.A. Times has a big story about “doc shock” spreading like wildfire across California.  Unlike the Democrats’ hilariously stupid “job lock” talking point – in which they’ll try to convince their less discriminating followers that employment is a form of slavery which ObamaCare liberates you from by getting you fired – “doc shock” is very real, and it’s getting worse:
A month into the most sweeping changes to healthcare in half a century, people are having trouble finding doctors at all, getting faulty information on which ones are covered and receiving little help from insurers swamped by new business.
Experts have warned for months that the logjam was inevitable. But the extent of the problems is taking by surprise many patients — and even doctors — as frustrations mount.
This vignette about a cancer patient arriving at her oncologists’ to find a brightly-colored sign telling her to get lost will be one of the defining images of the ObamaCare disaster:
Aliso Viejo resident Danielle Nelson said Anthem Blue Cross promised half a dozen times that her oncologists would be covered under her new policy. She was diagnosed last year with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and discovered a suspicious lump near her jaw in early January.
But when she went to her oncologist’s office, she promptly encountered a bright orange sign saying that Covered California plans are not accepted.
“I’m a complete fan of the Affordable Care Act, but now I can’t sleep at night,” Nelson said. “I can’t imagine this is how President Obama wanted it to happen.”
Really?  You must have missed the appearance where Obama described doctors as tonsil-stealing vampires who love to perform unnecessary surgery to line their pockets., Ms. Viejo.  Or failed to hear the warnings from the absolutely correct ObamaCare critics who told you this was going to happen.  Restricted access to doctors is the only way insurance companies can control costs while complying with mandates imposed by politicians who couldn’t treat a paper cut without the aid of paramedics.  Barack Obama thinks politics is the only real profession; everyone else is an interchangeable drone.  One doctor should be as good as another for you peasants.
Obama supporters are still grappling with the painful realization that their man lied outrageously and shamelessly when he promised they would be able to keep their insurance plans, so it’s tough for them to process he was lying about keeping your doctor, too.
Even the people getting big taxpayer subsidies are finding out their “affordable” plans (everything looks more affordable when someone else pays for it!) aren’t worth much when you can’t find a doctor who will accept them:
Maria Berumen, a tax preparer in Downey, was uninsured for years because of preexisting conditions. The 53-year-old was thrilled to find coverage for herself and her husband for $148 a month after qualifying for a big government subsidy.
She jumped at the chance in early January to visit a primary-care doctor for long-running numbness in her arm and shoulder as a result of bone spurs on her spine. The doctor referred her to a specialist, and problems ensued. At least four doctors wouldn’t accept her health plan — even though the state exchange website and her insurer, Health Net Inc., list them as part of her HMO network.
“It’s a phantom network,” Berumen said.
It was no surprise to her family doctor, Ragaa Iskarous. She has run into this problem repeatedly with other patients in the last month, the doctor said. “This is really driving us crazy.”
“The Phantom Network” was my least favorite Star Wars movie, what with the endless scenes of the evil Senator Palpatine using Sith mind-tricks to make the Galactic Senate forget about the latest Cosmic Budget Office report.  I mean, get to the midichlorian-subsidized lightsaber battles already.
You’ll be relieved to know that Ms. Berumen finally got to see a neurosurgeon, “after state regulators intervened on her behalf.”  You have state regulators ready to personally intervene on your behalf, don’t you?  If so, then rest assured ObamaCare will kinda-sorta work, if you don’t mind waiting for the paperwork to shuffle and the back-channel phone calls to be placed.
Naturally, the Ruling Class – which was either blind or dishonest about doc shock for the past four years – thinks the latest problem created by government can be fixed with more government:
To hold down premiums under the healthcare law, major insurers have sharply cut the number of doctors and hospitals available to patients in the state’s new health insurance market.
Now those limited options are becoming clearer, and California officials say they are receiving more consumer complaints about access to medical providers. State lawmakers are also moving swiftly to ease some of the problems that have arisen.
“It’s a little early for anyone to know how widespread and deep this problem is,” said California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones. “There are a lot of economic incentives for health insurers to narrow their networks, but if they go too far, people won’t have access to care. Network adequacy will be a big issue in 2014.”
Network adequacy.  Lovely euphemism.  ”What did your mom die from?” “Oh, it was a network-adequacy complex, developed after complications from ObamaCare.”
The Washington Examiner reports that federal regulators also think another thousand pages of regulations should fix a few of the problems in the previous fifteen thousand pages :
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on Tuesday proposed a new guidance for 2015 aimed at expanding choices of doctors and hospitals on plans offered through the exchanges in President Obama’s health care law…
Awesome!  See, you can legislate the laws of supply and demand out of existence!  In your face, free markets!
… but in an effort to answer one complaint of Obamacare, the proposed regulations could exacerbate another, by further driving up premiums.
Oh.  Never mind.
In a Tuesday letter to health insurers, CMS proposed a new set of rules to govern the plans to be offered through federal health exchanges for the 2015 benefit year.
The proposed rules would require insurers to submit a list of providers offered on each of their plans, and CMS would review the list to make sure that the plans provide “reasonable access” to hospitals, mental health providers, oncologists and primary care services.
“If CMS determines that an issuer’s network is inadequate under the reasonable access review standard, CMS will notify the issuer of the identified problem area(s) and will consider the issuer’s response in assessing whether the issuer has met the regulatory requirement and prior to making the certification or recertification determination,” the letter stated.
Great, so the bureaucrats who dumped the disastrous ObamaCare exchange network in our laps will now make imperial decisions about which doctors must work for what plans, driving the already hideous ObamaCare premiums up even higher, which will doubtless be followed by calls for even bigger deficit-blasting taxpayer subsidies, while the un-subsidized chumps who make the system sustainable by paying far too much for lousy insurance will become even less enthusiastic about enrolling in ObamaCare.  Sounds like the coming insurance industry bailout will be even more exciting than we thought!
Another problem with Big Government’s latest scheme to create a problem, and then use it as an excuse to seize even more power, is that doctors might have some inconvenient legal objections to the new requirements.  David Limbaugh wrote about one such doctor earlier this week, Dr. Kristin Held of San Antonio, who became an Internet sensation by delivering a declaration of independence to the Aetna insurance company.  Among other reasons Dr. Held gave for walking away from ObamaCare, she pointed out that it was forcibly altering her contract to provide services with Aetna, without her consent – or even prior notification! – which made the contract null and void, not to mention victimizing ObamaCare purchasers with what amounts to consumer fraud.  She called the system “tyranny through medicine” and declared “I will not comply.”
I will not comply.  What beautiful, perfectly American words those are!  If the commissars keep pumping out more regulations to patch the holes in the previous round of regulations, I suspect we’ll hear that patriotic declaration even more.
To return to the desperate Democrats and their dopey “job lock” talking point, if we really wanted to dissolve the frankly irrational link between employment and health insurance – another problem Big Government created, then presented itself as the solution to, half a century later – we could have done it without the rest of the garbage in Barack Obama’s train-wreck scheme.  Changing the system so that every individual owns their insurance is a feature of all the Republican proposals this deeply dishonest President keeps pretending he’s never heard of.  Allowing people to shop in truly competitive national markets for insurance would be the opposite of ObamaCare’s grim top-down socialist debacle, which is going to siphon an unholy fortune in overhead and compliance costs from the private sector.  It wouldn’t be necessary to hold anyone at gunpoint to solve the “doc shock” problem under such reforms.  Let’s junk ObamaCare and give it a try.



Economic data on hitmen

Economic data on hitmen

by  on January 26, 2014 at 8:03 am
The sample is pretty limited, but here is what they find:
The killers typically murder their targets on a street close to the victim’s home, although a significant proportion get cold feet or bungle the job, according to criminologists who examined 27 cases of contract killing between 1974 and 2013 committed by 36 men (including accomplices) and one woman.
…The reality of contract killing in Britain tended to be striking only in its mundanity, according to David Wilson, the university’s professor of criminology. He said: “Far from the media portrayal of hits being conducted inside smoky rooms, frequented by members of an organisedcrime gang, British hits were more usually carried out in the open, on pavements, sometimes as the target was out walking their dog, or going shopping, with passersby watching on in horror.”
Researchers found that the average cost of a hit was £15,180, with £100,000 being the highest and £200 the lowest amount paid. The average age of a hitman was 38 with the youngest aged 15 and the oldest 63.
The youngest, Santre Sanchez Gayle from north London, shot dead a young woman at point-blank range with a sawn-off shotgun in 2010 after she answered her front door. The oldest was David Harrison who, also in 2010, shot the owner of a skip-hire business in his Staffordshire home.
Most hits involved a gun, with three victims stabbed, five beaten to death and two strangled. The most conspicuous weapon was used in the killing of David King, a widely feared underworld figure known as “Rolex Dave”, who in 2003 was shot five times as he emerged from a Hertfordshire gym by hitman Roger Vincent and his accomplice David Smith, both 33. The killing was the first time an AK-47 assault rifle – apparently belonging to the Hungarian prison service – had been used on a British street.
For the pointer I thank Mike Brown.  By the way, those records are focused on Birmingham, England, which perhaps is not like Lodi, New Jersey in this regard.
The original work is cited as appearing in theHoward Journal of Criminal Justice, but I do not seem to find the article at that link.
http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2014/01/economic-data-on-hitmen.html

Lynda

2:16 PM (11 minutes ago)
to me

videos on Economic Hitmen:

Economic Hitmen: The Truth About Globalization

John Perkins on How the World Really Works

 
 
Economic Hitmen from Hans Fleischer on Vimeo. "We can't have Homeland Security until we realize that the whole planet is our homeland." -- John Perkins
 
 

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

video on this page
 

Confessions of an Economic Hit Man: How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

November 9, 2004
 
 

We speak with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies. [includes rush transcript]
John Perkins describes himself as a former economic hit man–a highly paid professional who cheated countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars.
20 years ago Perkins began writing a book with the working title, "Conscience of an Economic Hit Men."
Perkins writes, "The book was to be dedicated to the presidents of two countries, men who had been his clients whom I respected and thought of as kindred spirits–Jaime Roldós, president of Ecuador, and Omar Torrijos, president of Panama. Both had just died in fiery crashes. Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We Economic Hit Men failed to bring Roldós and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the CIA-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in.
John Perkins goes on to write: "I was persuaded to stop writing that book. I started it four more times during the next twenty years. On each occasion, my decision to begin again was influenced by current world events: the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1980, the first Gulf War, Somalia, and the rise of Osama bin Laden. However, threats or bribes always convinced me to stop."
But now Perkins has finally published his story. The book is titled Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. John Perkins joins us now in our Firehouse studios.
  • John Perkins, from 1971 to 1981 he worked for the international consulting firm of Chas T. Main where he was a self-described "economic hit man." He is the author of the new book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.

Transcript

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins joins us now in our firehouse studio. Welcome to Democracy Now!
JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It’s great to be here.
AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us. Okay, explain this term, "economic hit man," e.h.m., as you call it.
JOHN PERKINS: Basically what we were trained to do and what our job is to do is to build up the American empire. To bring — to create situations where as many resources as possible flow into this country, to our corporations, and our government, and in fact we’ve been very successful. We’ve built the largest empire in the history of the world. It’s been done over the last 50 years since World War II with very little military might, actually. It’s only in rare instances like Iraq where the military comes in as a last resort. This empire, unlike any other in the history of the world, has been built primarily through economic manipulation, through cheating, through fraud, through seducing people into our way of life, through the economic hit men. I was very much a part of that.
AMY GOODMAN: How did you become one? Who did you work for?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, I was initially recruited while I was in business school back in the late sixties by the National Security Agency, the nation’s largest and least understood spy organization; but ultimately I worked for private corporations. The first real economic hit man was back in the early 1950’s, Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy, who overthrew of government of Iran, a democratically elected government, Mossadegh’s government who was _Time_’s magazine person of the year; and he was so successful at doing this without any bloodshed — well, there was a little bloodshed, but no military intervention, just spending millions of dollars and replaced Mossadegh with the Shah of Iran. At that point, we understood that this idea of economic hit man was an extremely good one. We didn’t have to worry about the threat of war with Russia when we did it this way. The problem with that was that Roosevelt was a C.I.A. agent. He was a government employee. Had he been caught, we would have been in a lot of trouble. It would have been very embarrassing. So, at that point, the decision was made to use organizations like the C.I.A. and the N.S.A. to recruit potential economic hit men like me and then send us to work for private consulting companies, engineering firms, construction companies, so that if we were caught, there would be no connection with the government.
AMY GOODMAN: Okay. Explain the company you worked for.
JOHN PERKINS: Well, the company I worked for was a company named Chas. T. Main in Boston, Massachusetts. We were about 2,000 employees, and I became its chief economist. I ended up having fifty people working for me. But my real job was deal-making. It was giving loans to other countries, huge loans, much bigger than they could possibly repay. One of the conditions of the loan — let’s say a $1 billion to a country like Indonesia or Ecuador — and this country would then have to give ninety percent of that loan back to a U.S. company, or U.S. companies, to build the infrastructure — a Halliburton or a Bechtel. These were big ones. Those companies would then go in and build an electrical system or ports or highways, and these would basically serve just a few of the very wealthiest families in those countries. The poor people in those countries would be stuck ultimately with this amazing debt that they couldn’t possibly repay. A country today like Ecuador owes over fifty percent of its national budget just to pay down its debt. And it really can’t do it. So, we literally have them over a barrel. So, when we want more oil, we go to Ecuador and say, "Look, you’re not able to repay your debts, therefore give our oil companies your Amazon rain forest, which are filled with oil." And today we’re going in and destroying Amazonian rain forests, forcing Ecuador to give them to us because they’ve accumulated all this debt. So we make this big loan, most of it comes back to the United States, the country is left with the debt plus lots of interest, and they basically become our servants, our slaves. It’s an empire. There’s no two ways about it. It’s a huge empire. It’s been extremely successful.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. You say because of bribes and other reason you didn’t write this book for a long time. What do you mean? Who tried to bribe you, or who — what are the bribes you accepted?
JOHN PERKINS: Well, I accepted a half a million dollar bribe in the nineties not to write the book.
AMY GOODMAN: From?
JOHN PERKINS: From a major construction engineering company.
AMY GOODMAN: Which one?
JOHN PERKINS: Legally speaking, it wasn’t — Stoner-Webster. Legally speaking it wasn’t a bribe, it was — I was being paid as a consultant. This is all very legal. But I essentially did nothing. It was a very understood, as I explained in Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, that it was — I was — it was understood when I accepted this money as a consultant to them I wouldn’t have to do much work, but I mustn’t write any books about the subject, which they were aware that I was in the process of writing this book, which at the time I called "Conscience of an Economic Hit Man." And I have to tell you, Amy, that, you know, it’s an extraordinary story from the standpoint of —- It’s almost James Bondish, truly, and I mean—-
AMY GOODMAN: Well that’s certainly how the book reads.
JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, and it was, you know? And when the National Security Agency recruited me, they put me through a day of lie detector tests. They found out all my weaknesses and immediately seduced me. They used the strongest drugs in our culture, sex, power and money, to win me over. I come from a very old New England family, Calvinist, steeped in amazingly strong moral values. I think I, you know, I’m a good person overall, and I think my story really shows how this system and these powerful drugs of sex, money and power can seduce people, because I certainly was seduced. And if I hadn’t lived this life as an economic hit man, I think I’d have a hard time believing that anybody does these things. And that’s why I wrote the book, because our country really needs to understand, if people in this nation understood what our foreign policy is really about, what foreign aid is about, how our corporations work, where our tax money goes, I know we will demand change.
AMY GOODMAN: We’re talking to John Perkins. In your book, you talk about how you helped to implement a secret scheme that funneled billions of dollars of Saudi Arabian petrol dollars back into the U.S. economy, and that further cemented the intimate relationship between the House of Saud and successive U.S. administrations. Explain.
JOHN PERKINS: Yes, it was a fascinating time. I remember well, you’re probably too young to remember, but I remember well in the early seventies how OPEC exercised this power it had, and cut back on oil supplies. We had cars lined up at gas stations. The country was afraid that it was facing another 1929-type of crash — depression; and this was unacceptable. So, they —- the Treasury Department hired me and a few other economic hit men. We went to Saudi Arabia. We -—
AMY GOODMAN: You’re actually called economic hit men —e.h.m.’s?
JOHN PERKINS: Yeah, it was a tongue-in-cheek term that we called ourselves. Officially, I was a chief economist. We called ourselves e.h.m.'s. It was tongue-in-cheek. It was like, nobody will believe us if we say this, you know? And, so, we went to Saudi Arabia in the early seventies. We knew Saudi Arabia was the key to dropping our dependency, or to controlling the situation. And we worked out this deal whereby the Royal House of Saud agreed to send most of their petro-dollars back to the United States and invest them in U.S. government securities. The Treasury Department would use the interest from these securities to hire U.S. companies to build Saudi Arabia — new cities, new infrastructure — which we've done. And the House of Saud would agree to maintain the price of oil within acceptable limits to us, which they’ve done all of these years, and we would agree to keep the House of Saud in power as long as they did this, which we’ve done, which is one of the reasons we went to war with Iraq in the first place. And in Iraq we tried to implement the same policy that was so successful in Saudi Arabia, but Saddam Hussein didn’t buy. When the economic hit men fail in this scenario, the next step is what we call the jackals. Jackals are C.I.A.-sanctioned people that come in and try to foment a coup or revolution. If that doesn’t work, they perform assassinations. or try to. In the case of Iraq, they weren’t able to get through to Saddam Hussein. He had — His bodyguards were too good. He had doubles. They couldn’t get through to him. So the third line of defense, if the economic hit men and the jackals fail, the next line of defense is our young men and women, who are sent in to die and kill, which is what we’ve obviously done in Iraq.
AMY GOODMAN: Can you explain how Torrijos died?
JOHN PERKINS: Omar Torrijos, the President of Panama. Omar Torrijos had signed the Canal Treaty with Carter much — and, you know, it passed our congress by only one vote. It was a highly contended issue. And Torrijos then also went ahead and negotiated with the Japanese to build a sea-level canal. The Japanese wanted to finance and construct a sea-level canal in Panama. Torrijos talked to them about this which very much upset Bechtel Corporation, whose president was George Schultz and senior council was Casper Weinberger. When Carter was thrown out (and that’s an interesting story — how that actually happened), when he lost the election, and Reagan came in and Schultz came in as Secretary of State from Bechtel, and Weinberger came from Bechtel to be Secretary of Defense, they were extremely angry at Torrijos — tried to get him to renegotiate the Canal Treaty and not to talk to the Japanese. He adamantly refused. He was a very principled man. He had his problem, but he was a very principled man. He was an amazing man, Torrijos. And so, he died in a fiery airplane crash, which was connected to a tape recorder with explosives in it, which — I was there. I had been working with him. I knew that we economic hit men had failed. I knew the jackals were closing in on him, and the next thing, his plane exploded with a tape recorder with a bomb in it. There’s no question in my mind that it was C.I.A. sanctioned, and most — many Latin American investigators have come to the same conclusion. Of course, we never heard about that in our country.
AMY GOODMAN: So, where — when did your change your heart happen?
JOHN PERKINS: I felt guilty throughout the whole time, but I was seduced. The power of these drugs, sex, power, and money, was extremely strong for me. And, of course, I was doing things I was being patted on the back for. I was chief economist. I was doing things that Robert McNamara liked and so on.
AMY GOODMAN: How closely did you work with the World Bank?
JOHN PERKINS: Very, very closely with the World Bank. The World Bank provides most of the money that’s used by economic hit men, it and the I.M.F. But when 9/11 struck, I had a change of heart. I knew the story had to be told because what happened at 9/11 is a direct result of what the economic hit men are doing. And the only way that we’re going to feel secure in this country again and that we’re going to feel good about ourselves is if we use these systems we’ve put into place to create positive change around the world. I really believe we can do that. I believe the World Bank and other institutions can be turned around and do what they were originally intended to do, which is help reconstruct devastated parts of the world. Help — genuinely help poor people. There are twenty-four thousand people starving to death every day. We can change that.
AMY GOODMAN: John Perkins, I want to thank you very much for being with us. John Perkins’ book is called, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
http://www.democracynow.org/2004/11/9/confessions_of_an_economic_hit_man